Abstract
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe infection that can occur in severely immunocompromised patients. Efficient immune recognition of Aspergillus is crucial to protect against infection, and previous studies suggested a role for NOD2 in this process. However, thorough investigation of the impact of NOD2 on susceptibility to aspergillosis is lacking. Common genetic variations in NOD2 has been associated with Crohn’s disease and here we investigated the influence of these genetic variations on the anti-Aspergillus host response. A NOD2 polymorphism reduced the risk of IA after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Mechanistically, absence of NOD2 in monocytes and macrophages increases phagocytosis leading to enhanced fungal killing, conversely, NOD2 activation reduces the antifungal potential of these cells. Crucially, Nod2 deficiency results in resistance to Aspergillus infection in an in vivo model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Collectively, our data demonstrate that genetic deficiency of NOD2 plays a protective role during Aspergillus infection.
NOD2 has been shown to be crucial for immune recognition of Aspergillus infection. Here the authors show that a common NOD2 genetic variant associated with Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced risk of disease due to enhanced antifungal activates of monocytes and macrophages.
Introduction
Humans are ubiquitously exposed to airborne spores of Aspergillus, but only severe immunocompromised patients are at risk of developing pulmonary invasive aspergillosis (IA)1. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a distinctive elevated susceptibility to aspergillosis and infections in these patients are associated with a high mortality2. With increasing knowledge of the antifungal host response, it has become evident that not only the immunocompromised status of patients plays a role in susceptibility to infection, but also the genetic background of both the engrafted bone marrow and the recipient3. To provide a good risk stratification for the development of IA following HSCT, genetic susceptibility needs to be taken into account. Common polymorphisms in various pattern recognition receptor (PRR) pathways are known to be associated with an increased risk for aspergillosis, which includes dectin-13,4, pentraxin-35 as well as many other receptors6. These findings help to predict susceptibility, yet also provide insight into the importance of these pathways in antifungal host defence. These studies, therefore, may also aid in the development of novel immune targeted treatment strategies. Nevertheless, several immune pathways remain unexplored for susceptibility to aspergillosis.
One of these relatively unexplored receptor families are the NACHT-LRR receptors (NLRs), to which the intracellular nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) receptors belong. The NLR receptor Nlrp3 plays a role in IA via regulation of inflammasome activation and subsequently protective IL-1-mediated cytokine responses7. Two other NLR receptors NOD1 and NOD2 are primarily involved in the recognition of peptidoglycan-derived moieties from bacteria and in the induction of proinflammatory host responses8–12. Although Aspergillus does not contain peptidoglycan, some evidence suggests that these NOD receptors might play a role in host defence against aspergillosis13–16. In contrast to a previous study that demonstrated a crucial role for NOD1 in activation of corneal epithelial cells by Aspergillus16, we recently reported that NOD1 negatively modulates host defence by reducing cytokine responses and oxidative burst17. NOD2, another member of the NLR family is highly expressed in lungs of mice infected with Aspergillus, and in THP1 cells, RAW macrophages and A549 cells stimulated with Aspergillus13,14. The NOD2 agonist Muramyl-dipeptide (MDP) can synergistically increase Aspergillus-induced cytokine levels13,14. NOD2 also may play a role in host defence against fungal keratitis15,16. Recently, NOD2 was also suggested to play a role in the recognition of chitin18, a polysaccharide that is present in the cell wall of all fungi. Polymorphisms in NOD2 have been associated with host defence against infectious diseases. In particular, strong associations between NOD2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to tuberculosis have been identified19–22. It should, however, be noted that the strongest genetic association with NOD2 is with Crohn’s disease23. Polymorphisms in NOD2 impact autophagy and antigen presentation in host defence against bacteria24. Considering recent evidence suggesting a crucial role for the autophagy machinery in host defence against Aspergillus25, NOD2 is a candidate susceptibility gene for aspergillosis.
Although previous studies have revealed enhanced expression of NOD2 during aspergillosis and synergism with Aspergillus-induced cytokine responses, these studies did not thoroughly investigate whether NOD2 modulates anti-Aspergillus host defence. Additionally, it is unknown whether defective NOD2 signalling influences susceptibility to aspergillosis. Therefore, the present study investigates whether common polymorphisms in NOD2 or its complete deficiency influences susceptibility to IA, and whether it affects the immune response to Aspergillus. We demonstrate that genetic variation in NOD2 in humans and complete Nod2 deficiency in mice protects against IA. In line with this, NOD2 deficiency or its neutralization associates with increased antifungal activity of macrophages and monocytes, conversely NOD2 activation neutralizes fungal killing capacity of phagocytes. Our data collectively highlight a detrimental role for NOD2 receptor in anti-Aspergillus host defence.
Results
NOD2 genetic variation decreases the risk of IA after HSCT
To investigate the relationship between genetic variability in NOD2 and susceptibility to IA, four nonsynonymous SNPs in the NOD2 coding sequence were analysed (Table 1). The probability of IA was assessed according to recipient or donor genotypes by estimating the cumulative incidence of infection among transplant recipients at 24 months after HSCT. Among the SNPs tested, the donor, but not recipient, P268S (rs2066842) SNP in NOD2 was associated with an increased risk of IA (Fig. 1a). Other polymorphisms did not allow accurate risk estimations due to low (<0.05) allele frequencies in our study population. The cumulative incidence of IA for donor P268S was 32.7% for the CC genotype, 21.6% for CT and 20.0% for TT genotypes, respectively (Fig. 1a). The key contribution of the CC genotype to the risk of infection was further illustrated upon modelling a dominant mode of inheritance (cumulative incidence of IA, 32.7% for CC vs. 21.3% for CT and TT genotypes combined) (Fig. 1b). In a multivariate model accounting for age, gender, post-transplant neutropenia and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)26, the donor CC genotype at P268S conferred a 2.1-fold increased risk of developing IA after transplantation (95% CI, 1.15–4.47; p = 0.021; p-values calculated using Gray’s test). Collectively, these results highlight genetic variation at the NOD2 locus as a critical risk factor regulating susceptibility to IA after HSCT.
Table 1.
RefSNP | Genome coordinates | aa change | Alleles | CEU MAF | MAF in our study | HWE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs2066842 | chr16:50710713 | P268S | C > T | 0.102 | 0.278 | 0.72 |
rs2066844 | chr16:50712015 | R702W | C > T | 0.014 | 0.027 | 0.77 |
rs2066845 | chr16:50722629 | G908R | G > C | 0.005 | 0.002 | 1.00 |
rs2066847 | chr16:50729867 | 1007fs | − > C | 0.006 | 0.022 | 0.98 |
Publically available sequencing data from Pilot 1 of the 1000 Genomes Project (www.1000genomes.org) was used to determine MAF. Genome coordinates were extracted from the hg18 build
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, aa amino acid, P prolins, S serine, R arginine, W tryptophan, G Glycine, fs frameshift, CEU Utah Residents (CEPH) with Northern and Western Ancestry, MAF minor allele frequency, HWE Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium
The NOD2 P268S SNP alters pulmonary cytokine levels in IA
To assess whether the genotypes at P268S in NOD2 differentially regulate pulmonary inflammation in aspergillosis, cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from patients with IA were assessed. Genotype-specific differences were observed, with patients transplanted with bonemarrow carrying the TT genotype displaying lower median concentrations of IL-10 and IL-8 than CC + CT carriers (0.41 vs. 2.6 pg/mL; and 1125 vs. 2560 pg/mL). In addition, a trend toward decreased IL-6 and TNF levels was also observed among patients transplanted with bonemarrow from TT carriers (Fig. 1c). Collectively, these findings point to a NOD2 genotype-determined alteration in cytokine production in response to Aspergillus infection.
NOD2 variants alter A. fumigatus-induced cytokine responses
To examine the impact of NOD2 variation on host defence against Aspergillus, the impact of the NOD2 genetic variants on Aspergillus immune recognition and cytokine production was investigated. In vitro Aspergillus-induced cytokine responses of primary human PBMCs were stratified based on P268S (rs2066842), G908R (rs2066845), and R702W (rs2066844) genotypes, to investigate their influence on cytokines responses to A. fumigatus.
Individuals carrying the T-allele at P268S, which was associated with a reduced susceptibility to aspergillosis in patients (Fig. 1), induced significantly lower IL-1β and demonstrated a trend toward lower TNF production in response to Aspergillus stimulation (Fig. 2a). Additionally, the TT-genotype was associated with significantly lower IL-17A responses compared with individuals carrying the CC or CT genotypes (Fig. 2b). Heterozygous carriers of the G908R and R702W polymorphisms did not show significantly altered cytokine responses to Aspergillus (Supplementary Fig. 1), and homozygous carriers of these polymorphisms were not represented within our cohort.
Insertion of a cysteine at position 1007 (1007finsC) (rs2066847) induces a frameshift, which results in a defective NOD2 receptor, and homozygous carriage of this mutation results in complete NOD2 deficiency and is highly associated with Crohn’s disease27. Healthy individuals heterozygous for this mutation demonstrated significantly lower IL-1β and a trend toward lower TNF, but not IL-6 responses to Aspergillus (Fig. 2c). The decreased IL-1β correlated with significantly lower IL-17A responses in individuals carrying the Cysteine-insertion on one allele (Fig. 2d). Interestingly, Aspergillus-induced IFNγ or IL-22 production was not affected by this genotype (Fig. 2d).
The 1007insC frameshift mutation enhances fungal killing
For the P268S and 1007insC polymorphisms the impact on fungal killing capacity was evaluated. Although, the P268S polymorphism did not significantly impact Aspergillus killing (Fig. 2e), PBMCs of healthy individuals carrying the Cysteine-insertion (rs2066847) on one allele had a significantly increased capacity to neutralize Aspergillus-conidia (Fig. 2f). Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is highly important for host defence against aspergillosis, especially when considering that CGD patients that cannot produce ROS are highly susceptible to aspergillosis28. However, oxidative burst in response to Aspergillus was not influenced by the different NOD2 genotypes (Fig. 2g, h).
Human NOD2 deficiency reduces Aspergillus-induced cytokines
To further investigate the importance of NOD2 in Aspergillus-induced cytokine response, we analysed responses of primary human PBMCs within a background of complete NOD2 deficiency. PBMCs from patients with Crohn’s disease, homozygous for the 1007finsC polymorphism and thus deficient for the NOD2 receptor, were stimulated with A. fumigatus. NOD2-deficient PBMCs demonstrated significantly lower IL-1β and TNF responses compared to controls (Fig. 3a). NOD2 deficient PBMCs also showed a significant reduction in production of the T-helper cytokines IL-22 and Interferon(IFN)γ and a trend toward decreased IL-17A induced by conidia (Fig. 3b). These reduced cytokine responses correlated with a reduced capacity to expand populations of IL-17A+, IL-22+, and IFNγ+ CD4 T-cells (Fig. 3c). Similar to individuals with heterozygous 1007insC mutations, the homozygous individuals demonstrated a trend toward improved fungal killing (Fig. 3d). However, no change in the capacity to induce ROS by zymosan or Aspergillus was observed (Fig. 3e).
Nod2−/− mice are less susceptible to IA
Since NOD2 genetic variation was associated with a reduced risk of IA, the impact of full Nod2 deficiency on susceptibility to aspergillosis was validated in an experimental model of IA. Wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 and Nod2-deficient (Nod2−/−) C57BL/6 mice were immunosuppressed using cyclophosphamide and subsequently subjected to lethal Aspergillus infection29. Nod2−/− mice demonstrated a significantly improved 14-day survival, compared to WT mice (Fig. 4a). During infection, WT mice decline in bodyweight and seven out of eleven mice did not survive the infection whereas eight out of nine Nod2−/− mice survived the infection, despite having similar weight loss as WT mice during the first 3 days of infection (Fig. 4b). Although Nod2−/− mice demonstrated severe symptoms such as hunching, head tilting, and circling, symptoms that have been described in the in vivo aspergillosis mouse model30, they survived the infection, in contrast to WT mice. Bioluminescence imaging revealed that Nod2−/− mice rapidly cleared the luciferase-expressing Aspergillus, whereas WT mice developed a fungal infection as indicated by a significantly higher luminescence signal on day 3 post infection (pi) (Fig. 4c, d). After day 3 pi the luminescence could not be reliably compared between groups due to mice dropping out of the experiment (Supplementary Fig. 2), and severe hypoxia in critically ill mice that influences bioluminescence readout. For assessment of histopathological damage in the lungs, inflammation and fungal burden, mice were sacrificed on day 3 pi. The decreased bioluminescence signal in the lungs of Nod2−/− mice correlated with the fact that almost no Aspergillus DNA could be detected in the lung homogenates of Nod2−/− mice (3 out of 8 mice were PCR positive with low values). However, in the lung homogenates of WT mice, Aspergillus PCR was positive for 5 out of 8 mice (Fig. 4e).
Nod2−/− mice show reduced pulmonary histopathological damage
Using histopathological analysis differences inflammatory and pathological damage to the lungs and sinuses of WT and Nod2−/− mice were assessed. Within the lungs, WT mice displayed multifocal large areas of ischaemic necrosis (Fig. 5a I, circles and arrowheads), with fibrinous thrombi and destruction of blood vessels (Fig. 5a II, arrow). In contrast, Nod2−/− mice rarely displayed inflammatory infiltrates and when present small (Fig. 5a I, circle and arrowhead; II, arrow). Severe fungal invasion was observed in WT mice (Fig. 5a III) with a high density of hyphae that invaded blood vessels (Fig. 5a III arrow). In contrast, fungi were rarely observed in lungs of Nod2−/− mice, only conidia (Fig. 5a III arrow), without invasion of the parenchyma or blood vessels. Macrophages were observed in the lesions, either randomly distributed (Fig. 5a IV, wild-type mice) or gathered in the small infiltrates (Fig. 5a IV, Nod2−/− mice). Although the immune suppression drastically decreased the number of F4/80+ cells no differences were observed between the groups (Fig. 5a IV).
Using morphometric analysis, the average number of lesions per section and the affected area was quantified. WT mice had a trend towards a higher average number of lesions per section (Fig. 5b). Moreover, the affected area of the lesions was significantly larger in WT mice (Fig. 5b).
Additional histology slides confirmed our morphometric analysis, as WT mice displayed marked lung lesions characterized by large foci of ischaemic necrosis (Fig. 5c I: left of the black line) with destruction of the bronchi/bronchiole epithelium (Fig. 5c I, black arrowheads), fungal invasion of lung parenchyma (Fig. 5c II top row), destruction of alveoli (Fig. 5c III top row) and invasion of blood vessels (Fig. 5c IV top row). Similar lesions were observed in other WT mice (Fig. 5c second row) with invasion of blood vessels (Fig. 5c III second row) and hyphae crossing the bronchiole epithelium lining (Fig. 5c IV second row, black arrowhead). In contrast, Nod2−/− mice displayed no or minimal lesions (Fig. 5c third and fourth row). At a low magnification, no lesions could be observed (Fig. 5c I, II fourth row), whereas at a high magnification), few hyphae could be detected in the alveoli/alveolar walls (Fig. 5c III, IV fourth row, black arrowheads).
WT mice displayed invasive sinusitis, whereas nasal sinus lesions were absent in Nod2−/− mice (Fig. 6). Arrowheads indicate destruction of nasal mucosa (Fig. 6a, enlarged in Fig. 6b), and invasion of fungi (Fig. 6c). Nasal sinuses of Nod2−/− mice did not demonstrate any signs of destruction (Fig. 6d, e) or presence of fungi (Fig. 6f).
NOD2 augments Aspergillus-induced cytokine responses
Since NOD2 genetic variation and its complete deficiency correlated with a decreased cytokine release, the capacity of NOD2 signalling to boost Aspergillus-induced cytokine responses was investigated. Co-stimulation of NOD2 by MDP augmented Aspergillus-induced IL-1β and TNF responses (Fig. 7a). This could, however, not be achieved in cells of Crohn’s disease patients carrying the 1007finsC mutation (Fig. 7b). Similarly, cytokine responses to A. fumigatus by cells of Nod2−/− mice were investigated. Although BMDMs of Nod2−/− mice did not demonstrate altered IL-6, KC and TNF responses (Fig. 7c), splenocytes of Nod2−/− mice showed a reduced capacity to mount IL-6, KC, and TNF responses (Fig. 7d)
NOD2 inhibits phagocytosis and killing of A. fumigatus
The reduced susceptibility of Nod2−/− mice and patients with NOD2 genetic variants may be explained by enhanced killing capacity of myeloid cells due to their NOD2 deficiency, as monocytes from NOD2-deficient individuals demonstrated a trend toward Aspergillus killing (Fig. 3d). BMDMs from WT and Nod2−/− mice were compared for their fungal killing capacity, and Nod2−/− BMDMs proved to be more efficient at eradicating live Aspergillus conidia (Fig. 8a). Subsequently, NOD2 gene expression was silenced in human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) to validate that the absence of NOD2 also positively influences fungal killing in human cells. Treatment of MDMs with NOD2 targeting siRNA augmented fungal killing capacity (Fig. 8b). Since the absence of NOD2 positively influences fungal killing we hypothesized that NOD2 activation might impair antifungal host defence. Human MDMs were, therefore, pre-exposed to the NOD2 agonist MDP and subsequently fungal killing capacity was examined. In line with the observation that NOD2 deficiency and silencing is associated with increased Aspergillus killing capacity, NOD2 activation conversely reduced the capacity of human MDMs to kill Aspergillus spores (Fig. 8c).
Several antifungal mechanisms could account for the observed increased killing capacity of Aspergillus in monocytes and macrophages. Phagocytosis and ROS production are well-established factors that influence the fungal killing capacity. Therefore, these two possible mechanisms were systematically addressed to explain increased killing. Nod2−/− BMDMs demonstrated an enhanced capacity to engulf FITC-labelled A. fumigatus conidia, illustrated by a higher percentage FITC-positive macrophages and an overall higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the macrophages (Fig. 8d), indicating that more conidia were engulfed and more cells were actively engulfing conidia. Similarly, human MDMs in which NOD2 was silenced showed a trend towards an increased phagocytosis (Fig. 8e). Conversely, MDP-stimulated MDMs demonstrate a reduced phagocytosis of FITC-labelled conidia (Fig. 8f).
Although no influence of human NOD2 deficiency on ROS production was found (Fig. 3e), we wanted to validate that ROS production was indeed not influenced by NOD2 deficiency and NOD2 stimulation. BMDMs of WT and Nod2−/− mice stimulated with zymosan demonstrated a similar capacity to produce ROS (Fig. 8g). NOD2 stimulation of human MDMs also did not influence ROS production in response to zymosan stimulation (Fig. 8h). These data suggest that the observed increased killing in the setting of NOD2 deficiency is due to enhanced phagocytosis and not via increased ROS production in contrast to NOD1 deficiency17.
NOD2 negatively regulates dectin-1 expression
One of the most crucial receptors for A. fumigatus recognition and engulfment is dectin-1. Therefore, we investigated whether NOD2 influenced the expression of dectin-1. Nod2−/− BMDMs showed an increased expression of Clec7a, the gene encoding dectin-1 (Fig. 8i). Similarly, silencing NOD2 in human MDMs slightly enhanced CLEC7A mRNA expression (Fig. 8j). Conversely, MDP stimulation reduced surface dectin-1 expression on human MDMs (Fig. 8k).
MDP inhibits antifungal immunity in WT cells
To verify that MDP did not have off-target effects negatively influencing fungal killing, phagocytosis, and dectin-1 expression, monocytes of healthy volunteers that were wild type for the investigated NOD2 SNPs were compared with three NOD2-deficient patients. Similarly, fungal killing was assessed in murine BMDMs. MDP significantly reduced in murine BMDMs (Fig. 9a) and in human monocytes fungal killing (Fig. 9b), phagocytosis (Fig. 9c), and dectin-1 expression (Fig. 9d), whereas in the cells of Nod2−/− mice or NOD2-deficient patients no effect of MDP could be detected.
Discussion
PRRs are key players in activating the antifungal host response during invasive aspergillosis (IA) by inducing cytokine responses and facilitating phagocytosis with subsequent fungal killing. PRRs on the cell surface, such as Toll-like receptors and C-type lectin receptors, have been extensively described in inducing these responses in host defence against Aspergillus31. Genetic variation in PRRs is common in the general population, however, in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (HSCT), such variations can drastically impact susceptibility to IA6. The only intracellular PRRs explored to date, NLRP3 and NOD1 belonging to the NLRs, provide evidence that this class of receptors can modulate host responses against A. fumigatus7,17. However, one of the most well known NLRs that is directly linked with immunodysregulation that leads to disease23, namely NOD2, remains largely unexplored in the context of anti-Aspergillus host defence13–16, Here, we systematically addressed the role of NOD2 in susceptibility to Aspergillus infection.
We report an association between NOD2 genetic variation, Nod2 deficiency and decreased susceptibility to IA. Specifically, the TT-genotype at P268S confers resistance to IA after HSCT, a finding highlighting a potential NOD2-dependent detrimental effect on antifungal immunity. A potential limitation of our study is the lack of association for other NOD2 polymorphisms eventually with more noticeable loss-of-function phenotypes. This may, however, be explained by the low allele frequency of such variants, which do not allow accurate risk estimations. A previous study also investigated NOD2 polymorphisms in association with aspergillosis in HSCT patients. Although in this study a lack of association due to the low frequency of the variants was observed for 1007finsC and G908R polymorphisms32, a strong trend (p = 0.05) towards a reduced presence of the mutated R702W allele was observed in IA patients32.
Functionally, we demonstrate that in particular the 1007finsC polymorphism impacts the response of primary immune cells to Aspergillus, namely in cytokine signalling and fungal killing, whereas we only observed an effect of the P268S polymorphism on cytokine responses.
Immunosuppression and cytostatic drugs needed for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune disorders makes patients highly susceptible to invasive fungal infections such as IA. Cyclophosphamide is a drug used to treat hematological malignancies or to suppress the immune system to preventgraft rejection and renders mice highly susceptible to develop infections with Aspergillus fumigatus. This immunosuppression allows a low dose of intranasally administered conidia to cause an invasive infection that is lethal within days, which in immunocompetent mice would have been efficiently cleared30. Nod2-deficient mice were resistant against aspergillosis despite being immunosuppressed and showing severe symptoms of aspergillosis such as weight loss, hunching, head tilting, and circling30. The protection observed in Nod2−/− mice was associated with reduced fungal burden and reduced histopathological damage to the lungs. A deficiency in PRRs being protective against lethal aspergillosis is a striking observation. Especially since it is challenging to protect immunosuppressed mice even with available potent antifungal therapies, which often requires combinational therapies to achieve survival of these mice33,34.
The fact that we observe protection of Nod2 deficiency in an immunocompromised mouse model raises the question which cells are responsible for the protection. We observed resident macrophages, that remain in the lung even after immunosuppressive therapy, which could potentially mediate fungal killing. In the HSCT patients, the NOD2 P268S polymorphism was only associated with a reduced incidence of aspergillosis in the donor genotype. The donor genotype will represent the genotype of the patient’s myeloid cells following transplantation suggesting that the protective effect of NOD2 genetic variation lies within the myeloid compartment. Furthermore, we observe that NOD2 negatively affects the antifungal capacity of various types of myeloid cells, including murine BMDMs, human MDMs and human monocytes.
Interestingly, Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in Nod2-deficient mice was less severe than in wild-type animals due to reduced pulmonary inflammation35. We observed that some cytokines have lower levels in the BAL of aspergillosis patients having the TT-genotype at P268S (rs2066842). This might indicate a less severe infection that may be related to enhanced fungal killing. Nevertheless, we observed that NOD2 polymorphisms, as well as the complete deficiency of the receptor, were associated with decreased Aspergillus-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine responses. NOD2 stimulation augments Aspergillus-induced cytokine responses. It has been widely described that excessive inflammation, and in particular IL-17-mediated inflammation, can result in detrimental immunopathology during Aspergillus infections in mice36–39, but this is primarily observed in situations where the immune system is largely functional such as cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmoary aspergillosis, corticosteroid, and fully immunocompetent models. Although reduced cytokine-driven inflammation can contribute to less damage in certain aspergillosis models, a lower capacity to mount early cytokine response is also known to be a primary risk factor for susceptibility40. Based on our data, we can only conclude that NOD2 has a potential to modify Aspergillus-induced cytokines in vitro, but it needs to be elucidated whether this in any way contributes to the observed protection in HSCT patients with NOD2 variants and Nod2−/− mice.
What could then be the mechanism of protection in the setting of genetic NOD2 deficiency? Carriage of the 1007finsC polymorphism correlates with an increased fungal killing capacity. In addition, Nod2-deficient mice demonstrated improved fungal clearance compared to WT mice, which was associated with an absence of histological damage and fungal outgrowth within the lungs. In addition Nod2 deficiency in murine BMDMs or NOD2 silencing in human MDMs augments fungal killing, whereas NOD2 stimulation by MDP in human MDMs or monocytes suppresses fungal killing. Subsequently, we systematically addressed whether phagocytosis capacity and/or ROS production, which are well-established mechanisms needed for the killing of Aspergillus, would be altered in NOD2-deficient cells. We observed no effect on the ROS production. However, observed that NOD2 negatively regulates phagocytosis. Silencing of NOD2 gene expression slightly enhanced engulfment of A. fumigatus conidia, whereas NOD2 stimulation suppressed the phagocytic capacity of human MDMs and monocytes. Nod2−/− BMDMs were more efficient at engulfing A. fumigatus conidia than their WT counterparts. This is in line with a previous report showing that NOD2 polymorphisms improve phagocytosis of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli41. However, in NOD2-deficient patients, we did not observe augmented phagocytosis compared to healthy donor cells. At first sight this might argue against a role for NOD2 in phagocytosis, however, it needs to be taken into account that the rate of phagocytosis is already variable between humans. This is most likely explained by a different genetic background and, in the case of our patients, maybe even immunosuppressive medication. Comparing WT and Nod2-deficient murine cells and silencing of the same human cells making them NOD2 deficient practically eliminates these donor factors that contribute to variability of phagocytosis. To prove that NOD2 influences phagocytosis in human cells we made use of the following knowledge. NOD2 is a receptor for derivates of bacterial peptidoglycan, such as MDP, which is present in the peptidoglycan of both gram positive and negative bacteria8,10,11. When we studied killing and phagocytosis of Aspergillus in the presence or absence of MDP we observed that NOD2 stimulation indeed decreases phagocytosis and killing. By performing these experiments in cells isolated form NOD2-deficient patients we show that MDP in these cells did not influence phagocytosis and killing. These data strengthen the conclusion that NOD2 negatively influences phagocytosis and killing of Aspergillus and supports the concept that genetic NOD2 deficiency could confer protection against invasive aspergillosis by an increased capacity of NOD2-deficient cells to control fungal burden in the host.
One of the crucial PRRs for phagocytosis of A. fumigatus is the c-type lectin receptor dectin-142,43. On the one hand, when we studied the expression of dectin-1 in the setting of Nod2 deficiency or silencing we observed that when phagocytosis was increased this correlated with increased dectin-1 expression. On the other hand NOD2 stimulation with MDP decreased surface dectin-1 expression. The observed correlation between increased dectin-1 expression and increased phagocytosis and killing within the setting of NOD2 deficiency, may argue for a role for dectin-1, but does not exclude that other mechanisms are still playing a role in the observed protection.
Although it has previously been shown that other fungi such as Candida albicans are not recognized by NOD244,45, the fungal cell wall component chitin/chitosan that is present in both Aspergillus and Candida has been suggested to be a ligand for NLRs18,46. Chitosan activates NLRP3 and thereby activates the inflammasome and induces IL-1β production, whereas chitin did not activate NLRP346. Chitin induces IL-10 dependent on TLR9, mannose receptor and NOD218. These data suggest that NOD2 plays a role in the recognition of fungal molecules such as chitin. However, a different study demonstrated that chitin-induced IL-1Ra production in human PBMCs is independent of NOD247. In addition, chitin can synergize with the NOD2 ligand MDP to augment IL-1β and TNF responses47, similar to our current observation that Aspergillus synergizes with MDP stimulation. Although this underlines that chitin and possibly other fungal cell wall molecules synergize with NOD2 signalling to augment cytokine responses, further studies are required to identify the PAMPs in Aspergillus that are recognized by NOD2. Moreover, NOD2 may not be directly involved in recognizing Aspergillus, but rather coordinate the responses that are induced by other (membrane-bound) PRRs, for example, the orchestration of phagosome composition. NOD2 synergizes with TLR signalling to yield more potent inflammatory responses48–52. Selective modulation of signals from PRRs that recognize Aspergillus is a possible mechanism by which the NOD receptors regulate the host response to A. fumigatus.
Collectively our data highlight a detrimental effect for NOD2 on antifungal host defence against A. fumigatus. This places NOD2 in a unique position in anti-Aspergillus host defence. It has the capacity to increase phagocytosis and killing in a ROS independent way. This could provide a rationale for treating patients that are immunosuppressed, either due to primary immunodeficiency such as chronic granulomatous disease that lack ROS or in patients that receive corticosteroids that suppress immune cells to produce ROS. Moreover, the effects of NOD2 deficiency are in sharp contrast with NOD1 deficiency. NOD1-deficient cells show increased cytokine production in response to Aspergillus. This might be beneficial, but could also be detrimental during the natural course of aspergillosis. Moreover, the oxidative burst is significantly higher under NOD1 deficient conditions and is decreased by NOD1 stimulation17, whereas in NOD2 we do not find an association with altered ROS production. NOD1 and NOD2 are closely related and interact with each other, therefore one would expect they behave similar in anti-Aspergillus host defence, but here we demonstrate clear different roles for NOD2 than the previous effects described for NOD117. A potential explanation for the different phenotypes observed with NOD1 and NOD2 deficiency is that Aspergillus PAMPs may have different affinities for the two different receptors or that different PAMPs bind and/or activate the receptors. Binding of the receptors by different PAMPs could lead to the fact that both receptors compete for the downstream adapter RICK, which was previously proposed to explain differential regulation of inflammation by NOD1 and NOD2 in arthritis53. An alternative explanation for the different phenotypes observed with NOD1 and NOD2 is that one, or both, of these receptors, can, in addition to RICK, induces an alternative-signalling cascade. Of note, it has previously been demonstrated that NOD2 can signal through the intracellular adaptor CARD954, which has a strong association with antifungal host response55,56. It is tempting to speculate that the detrimental effect of NOD2 may be due to sequestering CARD9 from other receptors requiring CARD9 as a signalling adaptor, such as dectin-157, dectin-258. Further studies using NOD1/NOD2, RICK, and NOD2/CARD9 knockout mice and co-precipitations would be required to investigate how the molecular pathways of NOD1 and NOD2 intertwine to mediate detrimental effects on the antifungal host response against Aspergillus.
NOD2 deficiency mediates protection against Aspergillus in mice, and polymorphisms in NOD2 alter the susceptibility of HSCT patients to develop aspergillosis. These effects are in the context where NOD2 seems to play a role in the induction of innate and adaptive cytokine responses against Aspergillus in humans. The absence of NOD2, however, strongly correlates with an enhancement of fungal killing and phagocytosis, which is independent of ROS. This makes NOD2 an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis.
Methods
Study design
A total of 310 consecutive haematological patients of European descent undergoing allogeneic HSCT at Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, and at the Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, between 2010 and 2014, and respective donors, were included in the genetic association study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were as previously described26 and are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Exclusion criteria were the development of fungal infection other than that caused by Aspergillus spp., and pre-transplant fungal infection. It should be noted that this cohort was previously successfully used for identification of genes conferring increased susceptibility to aspergillosis26. The sample size was estimated to provide a power of 80% (1 − β = 0.80) with a type I error below 5% (α = 0.05) for genetic variants with minor allele frequencies between 10 and 20% conferring a relative risk of 2.0.
For the functional genomics study, similarly, the cohort was previously successfully used for identification of polymorphisms that lead to reduced cytokine responses59. The functional genomics cohort consisted of 200 healthy volunteers, of which approximately 80 (variable per genotype) were included in the current study. Individuals of which the genotype could not reliably be determined using SNP assays, and individuals that were not assessed for cytokine production were excluded from the analysis. The sample size of 80 healthy individuals was estimated to provide a power of 70% (1 − β = 0.70) with a type I error below 5% (α = 0.05) for genetic variants with a minor allele frequencies of 20% conferring an odds ratio of 2.5. No patients were excluded in these studies. All cytokine and killing assays were performed by a researcher blinded for the genotype.
Ethics statement
For the genetic association study, approval was obtained from the Ethics Subcommittee for Life and Health Sciences of the University of Minho, Portugal (125/014 and 014/015), the Ethics Committee for Health of the Instituto Português de Oncologia—Porto, Portugal (26/015), the Ethics Committee of the Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Portugal (632/014), and the National Commission for the Protection of Data, Portugal (1950/015).
For the functional genomics study and patient studies, drawing of blood samples from patients and healthy volunteers was approved by the local ethical board at the Radboud University Nijmegen (Arnhem-Nijmegen Medical Ethical Committee).
For assessment of BAL cytokine levels approval was obtained from the Ethics Subcommittee for Life and Health Sciences of the University of Minho, Portugal (126/014), and the Ethics Committee of the University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium.
All patients and healthy volunteers provided written informed consent.
Mice were cared for in accordance with Institut Pasteur guidelines, in compliance with European animal welfare regulation. This study was approved by the ethical committee for animal experimentation CETEA (Comité d’éthique en experimentation animale, Project license number 2013-0020). Animal studies were conducted under protocols approved by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Committee on Use and Care of Animals (protocol no 482-100265-1-/13).
Healthy controls and NOD2 deficient patients
Venous blood samples from healthy controls and patients were obtained and were analysed for polymorphisms in NOD2 gene (P268S rs2066842, G908R rs2066845, R702W rs2066844 and 1007finsC, rs2066847). DNA was isolated from whole blood by using the isolation Gentra Pure Gene Blood kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Gene fragments were amplified and genotyped using commercially available TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol on the StepOnePlus system (Applied Biosystems). Quality control was performed by the incorporation of positive and negative controls and duplication of random samples across different plates.
Nine patients with Crohn’s disease that were homozygous for the 1007finsC polymorphism were included for studying NOD2 deficiency. Most patients received anti-inflammatory therapy for treatment of their Crohn’s disease; Patient 1 Mesalazine 1dd 1000 mg, Patient 2 No immunomodulation, Patient 3 Adalimumab 1 × 2 weeks 40 mg sub cutaneous, Patient 4 mesalazine 3dd 1 g and azathioprine 1dd 200 mg, Patient 5 infliximab every 8 weeks 300 mg iv, Patients 6–9 unknown.
Genotyping
DNA was isolated using the Gentra Pure Gene Blood kit (Qiagen), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Genotyping was performed using KASPar assays (LGC Genomics, Hertfordshire, UK) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system for the patient cohort. Mean call rate was >97% for all genotyped SNPs. Quality control for the genotyping results was achieved with negative controls, common and rare homozygous controls (whenever available), and retesting of samples with indeterminate results. Details of the MAF of the polymorphisms in our cohort are provided in Table 1 and linkage disequilibrium for all genotyped SNPs is shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Aspergillus fumigatus strains
A clinical isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus V05–27 was used for all ex vivo and in vitro stimulations60. Aspergillus was grown for 7 days at 37 °C on Sabouraud dextrose agar slants poured in T150 cell culture flasks (Corning). Abundant conidia were produced under these conditions. To harvest conidia phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.05% Tween 80 was poured on the slants and the surface was gently scraped using a cell scraper. To remove hyphae and debris, the conidial suspension was filtered through four layers of sterile gauze. Conidia were counted using a Bürker counting chamber, stored at −20 °C or heat inactivated for 30 min at 90 °C. A concentration of 1 × 107/mL was used in the experiments unless otherwise indicated. To obtain hyphal fragments, a suspension of 1 × 107/mL conidia was made in RPMI1640. After 10 h of incubation at 37 °C, the tubes were centrifuged at 1550 × g for 10 min, and the pellet, containing almost exclusively hyphae, was washed twice in PBS and heat inactivated for 30 min at 90 °C.
Heat-inactivated Aspergillus conidia (1 × 107/mL) were FITC-labelled by incubation with FITC at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL (SIGMA) in 0.05 M Na carbonate buffer (pH 10.2) at 37 °C for 1 h. Unbound FITC was washed away by centrifugation three times in PBS–0.1% Tween 20, and labelled conidia were resuspended in RPMI1640, counted and adjusted to a concentration of (4 × 108/mL)61. For in vivo experiments the luciferase-expressing Aspergillus fumigatus 2/7/1 strain was used29, this strain contains two genomic lucOpt integrations under control of the Aspergillus gpdA promotor that regulates stable luciferase expression62. The strain has a similar antifungal susceptibility as its parental CBS144.85 strain and demonstrates no growth defects under various in vitro cultivation conditions such as different temperatures and carbon sources29. In corticosteroid immunosuppressed mouse models of aspergillosis62, the 2/7/1 strain demonstrated a similar virulence as observed for its parental strain CBS144.8563,64.
PBMC isolation and stimulation
Venous blood was drawn into 10 mL EDTA tubes. Blood was diluted in PBS (1:1) and fractions were separated by Ficoll (Ficoll-Paque Plus, GE healthcare, Zeist, The Netherlands) density gradient centrifugation according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. Cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in RPMI-1640+ (RPMI1640 Dutch modification supplemented with 50 µg/mL gentamycin, 2 mM l-glutamine and 1 mM pyruvate; Gibco, Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands).
PBMCs were plated in 96-well round-bottom plates (Corning, NY, USA) at a final concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells/mL and in a total volume of 200 μL. The individuals in the functional genomic cohort were stimulated with medium (negative control) or live Aspergillus at a final concentration of 1 × 107/mL for 24 h or HI A. fumigatus conidia for 7 days (to prevent outgrowth of the fungus influencing the results). The NOD2-deficient patients were stimulated in the presence of 10% serum with the culture medium, live A. fumigatus conidia (1 × 107/mL), HI conidia (1 × 107/mL) or HI hyphae (derived from 1 × 107/mL conidia). PBMCs in co-stimulation experiments were exposed to 10 μg/mL MDP and subsequently stimulated with medium, HI conidia (1 × 107/mL). After stimulation culture supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C until cytokine measurement.
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry for Aspergillus-induced IL-17A+, IL-22+, and IFNγ+ T-cells was performed as described previously65. Following 7 day Aspergillus-stimulations, culture supernatants were removed and PBMCs were re-stimulated 4–6 h with PMA (50 ng/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), ionomycin (1 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), and GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences) according to the protocols supplied by the manufacturers. Cells were stained extracellular in a total volume of 50 μL using PE-Cy7–conjugated anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (eBiosciences, clone RM4–5, dilution 1:20). Subsequently, the cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (eBioscience) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. Following permeabilization the cells were stained intracellularly with Alexa 647-conjugated anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, Clone TC11-18H10, dilution 1:6), PE-conjugated anti-IL-22 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Clone 142928, dilution 1:12), and FITC-conjugated anti-IFNγ monoclonal antibody (eBioscience, clone 4s.B3, dilution 1:300) according to the protocols supplied by the manufacturer’s. The cells were measured on an FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and the data were analysed using CXP analysis software v2.2 (Beckman Coulter).
The surface dectin-1 expression on human MDMs was assessed following stimulation of with MDP as described above. MDMs were stained in a final volume of 50 μL with FITC-conjugated anti-human CD14 monoclonal antibody (BD; clone TUK 4, dilution 1:20), KromeOrange-conjugated anti-human CD45 monoclonal antibody (Beckman Coulter; clone J.33, dilution 1:10) and APC-conjugated anti-human dectin-1 monoclonal antibody (R&D, clone 259931, dilution 1:10). CD14+ cells were gated within the population of CD45+ cells and subsequently, the Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Dectin-1 was assessed on the CD14+/CD45+ cells (Supplementary Figure 4). The cells were measured on a Cytoflex flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and the data were analysed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
Aspergillus killing assays
Freshly isolated PBMCs (5 × 105), human GM-CSF monocyte-derived macrophages (2 × 105) or murine BMDMs (2 × 105) were exposed to Aspergillus conidia (2 × 106) in 96 well plates a final volume of 200 μL. After 24 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed in water and plated in serial dilution on Sabouraud agar plates. CFUs were counted after 24 h at 37 °C.
Phagocytosis assays
Human CD14+ monocytes, human MDMs, or BMDMs were plated in 24 flat bottom plates at 5 × 105 cells/well. Cells were allowed to phagocytose 5 × 106 (MOI 1:10) heat inactivated FITC-labelled conidia for 4 h. Subsequently the fluorescence signal of extracellular non-phagocytosed conidia was quenched using 0.2% trypan blue. The cells were measured on a Cytoflex flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and the data were analysed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter). The monocytes that phagocytosed one or more conidia were enumerated by their positivity for the FITC signal, and could be divided into a FITC negative (monocytes that did not engulf conidia) and a FITC positive (monocytes that engulfed conidia) population. Phagocytosis efficiency was assessed as the mean fluorescence intensity of FITC+ macrophage population (Supplementary Figure 5).
ROS induction
The induction of ROS was measured by oxidation luminol (5-amino-2,3,dihydro-1,4-phtalazinedione). PBMCs (5 × 105), murine BMDMs (1 × 105), human MDMs (1 × 105) were resuspended in HBSS and put in dark 96-well plates. Cells were exposed to HBSS, A. fumigatus germs (1 × 107/mL; PBMCs only) or Zymosan (150 µg/mL). Immediately 20 µL of 1 mM luminol was added. Chemiluminescence was measured in BioTek Synergy HTreader at 37 °C for every min during 1 h.
Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for CLEC7A expression
RNA was isolated according to the protocol supplied with the TRIzol reagent. Isolated mRNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (BIORAD). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) and following primers (all manufactured by Biolegio) for human samples hNOD2 Fwd 5′-CCCTGCAGCTGGACTACAACT-3′ and Rev 5′-AGATGCCTCGGTCTGAGATATTG-3′, hGAPDH Fwd 5′-AGGGGAGATTCAGTGTGGTG-3′ and Rev 5′-CGACCACTTTGTCAAGCTCA-3′ hCLEC7A Fwd 5′-ACAATGCTGGCAACTGGGCT-3′ and Rev 5′-GCCGAGAAAGGCCTATCCAAAA-3′ and the following primer sets form mouse samples mClec7a Fwd 5′-AGGTTTTTCTCAGCCTTGCCTTC-3′ and Rev 5′-GGGAGCAGTGTCTCTTACTTCC-3′, mGapdh Fwd 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ and Rev 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′. PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems StepONE PCR system using PCR conditions 2 min 50 °C, 10 min 95 °C followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The RNA genes of interest were corrected for differences in loading concentration using the signal of the housekeeping protein GAPDH.
NOD2 silencing
Freshly isolated PBMCs were differentiated to macrophages using 6-day differentiation in 10% human serum supplemented with 5 ng/mL GM-CSF (R&D systems). After differentiation (1 × 105) macrophages were seeded in 96 well plates and left for 2 h at 37 °C to subsequently transfect them with 25 nM NOD2 targeting siRNA (on target) or scrambled (non-target) control siRNA (smart pool, Thermo Scientific) for 24 h at 37 °C (Dharmafect, Thermo Scientific). Subsequently, the culture medium was refreshed and cells were used for killing and phagocytosis assays and PCR analysis.
In vivo experiments
Mice for in vivo experiments were supplied by the breeding centre R. Janvier (Le Genest Saint-Isle, France). All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in IVC cages, and fed standard chow and water ad libitum. For the survival experiment in an immunosuppressed background C57BL/6 wild-type (6male/7female), and C57BL/6 Nod2−/− (7male/2female) mice (28 to 31 g, 10 weeks old) were used. An estimated power of 80% (1 − β = 0.80) with a type I error below 5% (α = 0.05) for a relative risk of 1.8 was estimated based on a median survival of 4 days in the control group. Mice were separated between genotypes into cages without further randomization and immunosuppressed at day 4 and day 1 before infection by intraperitoneal injection of 200 µL cyclophosphamide (Sigma Aldrich) at 4 mg/mL. At the day of infection, mice were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection (150 µL) of ketamine (10 mg/mL) and xylazine (10 mg/mL) hair was shaved from the ventral lung area and subsequently, mice were inoculated intranasally with 5 × 104 luciferase expressing A. fumigatus 2/7/1 conidia29 in 25 µL PBS.
In all experiments, survival and weight was monitored in an unblinded fashion during the course of infection.
For histological assessment female C57BL/6 wild-type and C57BL/6 Nod2−/− mice (19 to 22 g, 8 weeks old) were used. With 8 mice per group in two separate experiments a power was estimated of 80% (1 − β = 0.80) with a type I error below 5% (α = 0.05) for a variance of 5%. They received similar immunosuppression regimen and were similarly infected as the mice for survival. Weight and bioluminescence were monitored daily during the course of infection. At day 3 the mice were euthanized.
Bioluminescence imaging
Bioluminescence imaging was acquired at day 1 post-infection (pi) and was continued on days 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 pi. Images were acquired using an IVIS 100 system (PerkinElmer) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analysis and acquisition were performed using Living Image software, version 2.6 (Xenogen). A volume of 100 μL of PBS containing 3.33 mg D-luciferin was injected intraperitoneally before each measurement. During image acquisition, mice were anesthetized using a constant flow of 2.5% isoflurane mixed with oxygen by means of an XGI-8 gas anaesthesia system (Xenogen), which allowed control over the duration of anaesthesia. Images were acquired for 5 min62. Quantification of photons per second emitted by each organ was performed by defining regions of interest corresponding to the respective organs of interest (sinus and thorax region), using the Xenogen software Living Image, version 3.0.
Aspergillus PCR
Lung homogenates were obtained following disruption in saline using the Retsch Mixer Mill 301 homogenizer. The fungal burden was determined by amplification of Aspergillus ITS2 regions. Briefly, Homogenized tissue samples were used for DNA isolation by using the automated MagNA Pure system and the MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit according to manufacturers protocol (Roche Applied Science). PhHV was added to all samples as an internal isolation control. The concentration of total isolated DNA was measured by using the Quantus Fluorometer (Promega). Aspergillus loads were determined by real-time PCR using the LC480 instrument and the probes master kit (Roche Applied Science). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 37 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 10 min, and 50 cycles: 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 45 s. The rDNA ITS2 region of Aspergillus fumigatus was detected by using primers 5′-GCGTCATTGCTGCCCTCAAGC-3′, 5′-ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT-3′ and probe Cy5-TCCTCGAGCGTATGGGGCTT-BBQ. The PhHV isolation control was detected by using primers 5′-GGGCGAATCACAGATTGAATC-3′, 5′-GCGGTTCCAAACGTACCAA-3′ and probe LC610-TTTTTATGTGTCCGCCACCATCTGGATC-BBQ. For the ITS2 detection, a two-fold dilution series of the cloned PCR product was included to calculate the number of copies per reaction.
Histology
Sinuses and lungs were removed and immediately fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. After fixation, sinuses were decalcified for 1 month, using a chelating agent (ethylenediaminetetracetic acid—EDTA) in order to allow routine processing of paraffin while preserving high-quality morphology. Sinus and lung samples were then embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 µm thick sections. Serial sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) for assessment histological lesions, Grocott’s methenamine silver for fungal detection.
For morphometric analysis, fields at a magnification of ×50, covering the entire lung sections of WT and Nod2−/− mice at day 2 post infection were selected and analysed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). We used the software to count the number of lesion foci per lung section, considering ischaemic necrosis foci for wild-type mice and small macrophage infiltrates for Nod2−/− mice since ischaemic necrosis was not observed in these mice. Using the software we also measured the size of ischaemic necrosis and macrophage infiltrate foci. Results were expressed as the number and surface of lung lesions, relative to the total lung sections.
To detect the presence of macrophages within the lung tissue, immunohistochemistry analysis was performed using a rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody (AbD Serotec, MCA497G, clone CI:A3-1, diluted 1:400), in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibody was visualized with the N-Histofine rat (Microm) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The colour was developed with 3-Amino-9-EthylCarbazole (AEC chromogen, Sigma). The sections were then counterstained with Meyer’s haematoxylin and cover-slipped for microscopic observation.
Cytokine measurements
The levels of cytokines in human BAL samples were quantified using the Human Premixed Multi-Analyte Kit (R&D Systems, MN, USA). The cytokine levels in culture supernatants of human PBMCs were measured using commercially available ELISA assays according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. IL-1β, TNF, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-22 assays were from R&D systems and IFNγ was from Sanquin (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Mouse IL-1β, TNF, IL-6, KC, IL-17A, IL-22, and IFNγ in splenocyte stimulations were measured using the Luminex multiplex platform (Millipore, Billerica, MA).
Statistical analysis
For the genetic association study, the probability of IA according to NOD2 genotypes was determined using the cumulative incidence method and compared using Gray’s test66. Cumulative incidences of infection at 24 months were computed with the cmprsk package for R version 2.10.167, with censoring of data at the date of last follow-up visit and relapse and death as competing events. The clinical and genetic variables achieving a p-value ≤0.15 in the univariate analysis were entered one by one in a pairwise model together and kept in the final model if they remained significant (p ≤ 0.05). Multivariate analysis was performed using the sub-distribution regression model of Fine and Gray with the cmprsk package for R68.
Data are presented as scatterplots representing individual data points and a line indicating the median value or as graphs ±SEM. Data from functional genomic experiments, in vitro experiments and in vivo experiments was subjected to D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test and was not normally distributed. No samples/animals were excluded from analysis in the in vivo experiments. For in vitro experiments all data points are shown without exclusion. In the functional genomic experiments only healthy individuals whose genotype could not accurately be determined were excluded from the studies. Unless otherwise indicated the Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine statistical significant differences between experimental groups and for paired analysis such as with MDP stimulation or siRNA treatment the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used with *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. All data were analysed using GraphPad Prism v6.0.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information Files. All relevant data are available by request from the authors, with the restriction of data that would compromise patient confidentiality.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Wertz and M. Fanton D’Andon for providing Nod2-deficient mice, M. Schlotter for organizing patient inclusion, B. Rösler for assistance with flowcytometry. We also thank the NOD2-deficient patients for contributing to our study by providing blood samples. M.S.G. was supported by the Erasmus lifelong learning program. F.L.v.d.V. was supported by the E-rare project EURO-CMC. M.O. was supported by the NWO, 016.176.006). A.C. and C.C. were supported by the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013), and the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) (IF/00735/2014 to A.C. and SFRH/BPD/96176/2013 to C.C.).
Author contributions
M.S.G., A.C., O.I.-G., and F.L.v.d.V. conceived and designed the study. M.S.G., C.C., M.J., R.K.S.M., S.M.G., A.A., R.L., M.O., O.R., G.J., C.F., W.M., and O.I.-G. performed experiments. M.S.G., C.C., M.J., R.K.S.M., A.A., G.J., W.M., A.C., O.I.-G., and F.L.v.d.V. analysed the data. D.J.d.J., J.F.L., A.C.J., K.L., and J.M. included patients. T.-D.K. provided valuable reagents and cell lines. M.S.G., M.J., and O.I.-G. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.S.G., W.M., T.-D.K., A.C., O.I.-G., and F.L.v.d.V. revised the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors jointly supervised this work: Oumaima Ibrahim-Granet, Frank L. van de Veerdonk.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-04912-3.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ben-Ami R, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Enemy of the (immunosuppressed) state: an update on the pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Br. J. Haematol. 2010;150:406–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morgan J, et al. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis following hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation: interim results of a prospective multicenter surveillance program. Med. Mycol. 2005;43(Suppl 1):S49–S58. doi: 10.1080/13693780400020113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cunha C, et al. Dectin-1 Y238X polymorphism associates with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis in hematopoietic transplantation through impairment of both recipient- and donor-dependent mechanisms of antifungal immunity. Blood. 2010;116:5394–5402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sainz J, et al. Dectin-1 and DC-SIGN polymorphisms associated with invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis infection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cunha C, et al. Genetic PTX3 deficiency and aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N. Eng. J. Med. 2014;370:421–432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cunha C, Aversa F, Romani L, Carvalho A. Human genetic susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003434. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karki R, et al. Concerted activation of the AIM2 and NLRP3 inflammasomes orchestrates host protection against Aspergillus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Inohara N, et al. Host recognition of bacterial muramyl dipeptide mediated through NOD2. Implications for Crohn’s disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:5509–5512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200673200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Girardin SE, et al. Nod1 detects a unique muropeptide from gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan. Science. 2003;300:1584–1587. doi: 10.1126/science.1084677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Girardin SE, et al. Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:8869–8872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200651200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Girardin SE, et al. Peptidoglycan molecular requirements allowing detection by Nod1 and Nod2. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:41702–41708. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chamaillard M, et al. An essential role for NOD1 in host recognition of bacterial peptidoglycan containing diaminopimelic acid. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:702–707. doi: 10.1038/ni945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang HJ, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus conidia upregulates NOD2 protein expression both in vitro and in vivo. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2008;29:1202–1208. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00860.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li ZZ, Tao LL, Zhang J, Zhang HJ, Qu JM. Role of NOD2 in regulating the immune response to Aspergillus fumigatus. Inflamm. Res. 2012;61:643–648. doi: 10.1007/s00011-012-0456-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu ZJ, et al. Nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 contributes to the innate immune response in THCE cells stimulated by Aspergillus fumigatus conidia. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2012;5:409–414. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.04.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Wu J, Xin Z, Wu X. Aspergillus fumigatus triggers innate immune response via NOD1 signaling in human corneal epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2014;127:170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gresnigt MS, et al. The absence of NOD1 enhances killing of Aspergillus fumigatus through modulation of Dectin-1 expression. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1777. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wagener J, et al. Fungal chitin dampens inflammation through IL-10 induction mediated by NOD2 and TLR9 activation. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004050. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Austin CM, Ma X, Graviss EA. Common nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the NOD2 gene are associated with resistance or susceptibility to tuberculosis disease in African Americans. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;197:1713–1716. doi: 10.1086/588384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kleinnijenhuis J, Oosting M, Joosten LA, Netea MG, Van Crevel R. Innate immune recognition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2011;2011:405310. doi: 10.1155/2011/405310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stockton JC, et al. Polymorphism in NOD2, Crohn’s disease, and susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2004;41:157–160. doi: 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang C, et al. NOD2 polymorphisms and pulmonary tuberculosis susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013;10:103–108. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.7585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McGovern DP, van Heel DA, Ahmad T, Jewell DP. NOD2 (CARD15), the first susceptibility gene for Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2001;49:752–754. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.6.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cooney R, et al. NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat. Med. 2010;16:90–97. doi: 10.1038/nm.2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sprenkeler EG, Gresnigt MS, van de Veerdonk FL. LC3-associated phagocytosis: a crucial mechanism for antifungal host defence against Aspergillus fumigatus. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:1208–1216. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cunha, C. et al. IL-10 overexpression predisposes to invasive aspergillosis by suppressing antifungal immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.034 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.van Heel DA, et al. Muramyl dipeptide and toll-like receptor sensitivity in NOD2-associated Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 2005;365:1794–1796. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66582-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Henriet S, Verweij PE, Holland SM, Warris A. Invasive fungal infections in patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013;764:27–55. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4726-9_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Galiger C, et al. Assessment of efficacy of antifungals against Aspergillus fumigatus: value of real-time bioluminescence imaging. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3046–3059. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01660-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ibrahim-Granet O, et al. In vivo bioluminescence imaging and histopathopathologic analysis reveal distinct roles for resident and recruited immune effector cells in defense against invasive aspergillosis. Bmc. Microbiol. 2010;10:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gresnigt MS, Netea MG, van de Veerdonk FL. Pattern recognition receptors and their role in invasive aspergillosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1273:60–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grube M, et al. TLR5 stop codon polymorphism is associated with invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Med. Mycol. 2013;51:818–825. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.809630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pirofski LA, Casadevall A. The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis and infectious diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008;635:135–146. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09550-9_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. What is a host? Incorporating the microbiota into the damage-response framework. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:2–7. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02627-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kapetanovic R, et al. Contribution of NOD2 to lung inflammation during Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia. Microbes Infect. 2010;12:759–767. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zelante T, et al. Th17 cells in the setting of Aspergillus infection and pathology. Med. Mycol. 2009;47(Suppl 1):S162–S169. doi: 10.1080/13693780802140766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zelante T, et al. IL-23 and the Th17 pathway promote inflammation and impair antifungal immune resistance. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37:2695–2706. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Romani L. Immunity to fungal infections. Nat. Rev. 2011;11:275–288. doi: 10.1038/nri2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gresnigt MS, et al. Reducing hypoxia and inflammation during invasive pulmonary aspergillosis by targeting the Interleukin-1 receptor. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26490. doi: 10.1038/srep26490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Caffrey AK, et al. IL-1alpha signaling is critical for leukocyte recruitment after pulmonary Aspergillus fumigatus challenge. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004625. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wolfkamp SC, et al. ATG16L1 and NOD2 polymorphisms enhance phagocytosis in monocytes of Crohn’s disease patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2664–2672. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Luther K, Torosantucci A, Brakhage AA, Heesemann J, Ebel F. Phagocytosis of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by murine macrophages involves recognition by the dectin-1 beta-glucan receptor and Toll-like receptor 2. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:368–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00796.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kyrmizi I, et al. Corticosteroids block autophagy protein recruitment in Aspergillus fumigatus phagosomes via targeting dectin-1/Syk kinase signaling. J. Immunol. 2013;191:1287–1299. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.van de Veerdonk FL, et al. The macrophage mannose receptor induces IL-17 in response to Candida albicans. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van der Graaf CA, et al. Nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 (Nod2) is not involved in the pattern recognition of Candida albicans. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 2006;13:423–425. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.3.423-425.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bueter CL, et al. Spectrum and mechanisms of inflammasome activation by chitosan. J. Immunol. 2014;192:5943–5951. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Becker, K. L. et al. Aspergillus cell wall chitin induces anti- and proinflammatory cytokines in human PBMCs via the Fc-gamma receptor/Syk/PI3K pathway. mBio7, e01823–15 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Grahl N, et al. In vivo hypoxia and a fungal alcohol dehydrogenase influence the pathogenesis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002145. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grahl N, Dinamarco TM, Willger SD, Goldman GH, Cramer RA. Aspergillus fumigatus mitochondrial electron transport chain mediates oxidative stress homeostasis, hypoxia responses and fungal pathogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;84:383–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08034.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barker BM, et al. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the Aspergillus fumigatus hypoxia response using an oxygen-controlled fermenter. BMC Genom. 2012;13:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ben-Ami R, Albert ND, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Proangiogenic growth factors potentiate in situ angiogenesis and enhance antifungal drug activity in murine invasive aspergillosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207:1066–1074. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wezensky SJ, Cramer RA., Jr. Implications of hypoxic microenvironments during invasive aspergillosis. Med. Mycol. 2011;49(Suppl 1):S120–S124. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.495139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Joosten LA, et al. Differential function of the NACHT-LRR (NLR) members Nod1 and Nod2 in arthritis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9017–9022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710445105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hsu YM, et al. The adaptor protein CARD9 is required for innate immune responses to intracellular pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:198–205. doi: 10.1038/ni1426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hsu JL, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus invasion increases with progressive airway ischemia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Frohlich S, Boylan J, McLoughlin P. Hypoxia-induced inflammation in the lung: a potential therapeutic target in acute lung injury? Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013;48:271–279. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0137TR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang H, He H, Dong Y. CARD9 Syk-dependent and Raf-1 Syk-independent signaling pathways in target recognition of Candida albicans by dectin-1. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011;30:303–305. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1103-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bi L, et al. CARD9 mediates dectin-2-induced IkappaBalpha kinase ubiquitination leading to activation of NF-kappaB in response to stimulation by the hyphal form of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:25969–25977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.131300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ammerdorffer A, et al. Recognition of Coxiella burnetii by Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;211:978–987. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Netea MG, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus evades immune recognition during germination through loss of Toll-like receptor-4-mediated signal transduction. J. Infect. Dis. 2003;188:320–326. doi: 10.1086/376456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chai LY, et al. Modulation of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 responses by Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:2184–2192. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01455-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brock M, et al. Bioluminescent Aspergillus fumigatus, a new tool for drug efficiency testing and in vivo monitoring of invasive aspergillosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:7023–7035. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01288-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dubourdeau M, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus induces innate immune responses in alveolar macrophages through the MAPK pathway independently of TLR2 and TLR4. J. Immunol. 2006;177:3994–4001. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Philippe B, et al. Killing of Aspergillus fumigatus by alveolar macrophages is mediated by reactive oxidant intermediates. Infect. Immun. 2003;71:3034–3042. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3034-3042.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gresnigt MS, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus-Induced IL-22 is not restricted to a specific Th cell subset and is dependent on complement receptor 3. J. Immunol. 2013;190:5629–5639. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann. Stat. 1988;16:14. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F. Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:381–387. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F. Regression modeling of competing risk using R: an in depth guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1388–1395. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information Files. All relevant data are available by request from the authors, with the restriction of data that would compromise patient confidentiality.