Skip to main content
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery logoLink to Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
. 2018 Jun 22;2(4):319–326. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12183

Obesity and recurrence‐free survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after achieving sustained virological response to interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Hiroji Shinkawa 1,, Shogo Tanaka 1, Shigekazu Takemura 1, Tokuji Ito 1, Takanori Aota 1, Masaki Koda 1, Toru Miyazaki 1, Takatsugu Yamamoto 2, Shoji Kubo 1
PMCID: PMC6036378  PMID: 30003195

Abstract

Aim

Some patients who achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) to interferon (IFN) treatment for chronic hepatitis C prior to hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) experience postoperative recurrence. This study investigated the relationship between obesity and postoperative HCC recurrence in SVR patients.

Methods

Fifty‐nine patients who had achieved SVR before hepatic resection were evaluated. Patients had a solitary tumor ≤5 cm in diameter or ≤3 lesions each ≤3 cm in size with no macroscopic vascular invasion (Milan criteria). Patient characteristics potentially associated with recurrence risk were investigated.

Results

Three‐, 5‐, and 7‐year recurrence‐free survival after surgery were 65%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that obesity (P < .01), hypertension (P = .038), and non‐anatomical resection (P = .022) were significantly associated with a lower recurrence‐free survival rate. In a multivariate analysis, obesity (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3‐6.1; P < .01) and non‐anatomical resection (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI 1.1‐6.2; P = .025) were independently associated with postoperative recurrence. Three‐, 5‐, and 7‐year overall survival rates after surgery were 100%, 80%, and 64% in obese patients and 100%, 92%, and 82% in non‐obese patients, respectively (P = .014). However, other variables showed no significant difference in the overall survival rate.

Conclusions

Obesity and non‐anatomical resection were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence after hepatic resection and successful IFN therapy. Obesity is an important clinical problem to consider to improve postoperative outcomes in such patients.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, interferon therapy, obesity, recurrence, sustained virological response

1. INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with an increasing incidence in Western countries,1 and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the causes. Interferon (IFN) can reduce hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and reduce the risk of HCC recurrence after resection of HCV‐related HCC, especially in patients with a sustained virological response (SVR).2 However, the annual incidence of HCC recurrence after HCV eradication is 0.3%‐2.4%.3, 4 The recognized risk factors for HCC development after SVR include advanced age, hepatic fibrosis, and alcohol abuse.4, 5 However, the risk factors associated with HCC recurrence after hepatic resection in SVR patients are unclear.

Obesity is a serious public health problem worldwide, and its incidence is increasing in Japan along with the Westernization of lifestyles. Obesity is closely associated with the development of metabolic syndrome, which includes hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus, and is independently associated with the risk of developing several malignancies, including breast, renal, and pancreatic cancer.6 Obesity has also been reported to be independently associated with the risk of hepatocarcinogenesis6, 7 resulting from the accumulation of fat in the liver and consequent hepatocellular injury.6, 8, 9 Obesity may influence HCC recurrence, but its involvement in postoperative recurrence in SVR patients with hepatic resection for HCC has not been investigated.

In the present study, we estimated the impact of obesity on HCC recurrence after hepatic resection following successful IFN therapy for HCV infection.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Patients

A total of 68 patients who were seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen and seropositive for anti‐HCV antibodies but had an SVR and a history of curative hepatic resection for HCC between January 1994 and December 2015 at the Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Hospital, were eligible. SVR was defined as a serum HCV‐RNA under the detection sensitivity limit at 6 months after the termination of IFN therapy.

Of the 68 eligible patients, we excluded nine with HCC outside the Milan criteria, which specify a solitary tumor ≤5 cm in diameter or ≤3 lesions, each ≤3 cm in diameter, without macroscopic vascular invasion. Tumors exceeding the Milan criteria are considered advanced and to have a potentially increased risk of recurrence. Curative hepatic resection was defined as complete resection of recognizable tumors and the histological absence of tumor cells along the parenchymal transection line.

Of the 59 remaining enrolled patients, 27 had received IFN monotherapy (IFN‐α in 19, IFN‐β in 1, and IFN alpha‐2b in 7). Five patients had received IFN alpha‐2b/ribavirin combination therapy, six had received pegylated (PEG)‐IFN monotherapy (PEG‐IFN alpha‐2a in three and PEG‐IFN alpha‐2b in three), and 21 had received PEG‐IFN/ribavirin combination therapy (PEG‐IFN alpha‐2a in three and PEG‐IFN alpha‐2b in 18). HCV strains were identified by genotyping in 36 patients and by serotyping in 21. The HCV strains in two patients were unidentified, as the test was not available at the regional hospital.

The study was conducted following the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of our institution and the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka City University (No. 3815). Informed consent was obtained from each patient.

2.2. Metabolic syndrome‐related factors

The metabolic syndrome‐related factors assessed were obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and a history of hypertension. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 following the criterion for adult Asian populations.10 Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL or the use of antidiabetes medications.11 Dyslipidemia was defined as serum triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL or the use of indicated medications.12 A history of hypertension was determined by interview. To evaluate the change in BMI after surgery, body weight measured at 3, 6, or 12 months after surgery was carried out.

2.3. Surgical treatment

Indication for surgery was based on an algorithm consisting of the presence/absence of ascites, serum total bilirubin level, and results of the indocyanine green (ICG) retention test.13 For anatomical resection, we divided the hepatic parenchyma along the demarcation line appearing after the occlusion of the portal vein and hepatic artery in hemihepatectomy and sectoriectomy, or after the injection of ICG into the portal vein conflicting the tumor‐bearing area in segmentectomy. In non‐anatomical resection, we divided the hepatic parenchyma along the line to maintain a surgical margin of 5 mm.

2.4. Detection of recurrence

Patients were evaluated by serum alpha‐fetoprotein, ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after surgery and every 3 months thereafter. If recurrence of HCC was suspected, selective hepatic angiography and an ultrasound‐guided biopsy were used to establish a definitive diagnosis, as required. Sites of recurrence were categorized into near the resection site (NR), which was the residual part of the tumor‐bearing third‐order portal branches and the part adjacent to the liver transection surface, or distant from the resection site (DR).

2.5. Histology

Histological evaluation followed the guidelines of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.14 Grade (severity of active hepatitis) and stage (degree of hepatic fibrosis) of non‐malignant hepatic tissue were scored using a histological activity index15, 16 including periportal necrosis with or without bridging necrosis, intralobular degeneration with focal necrosis, portal inflammation, and fibrosis. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score, which concentrates on macrovesicular steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning injury, was used to assess the degree of hepatic steatosis and inflammation. Details of the three components of the score are as follows: steatosis grade (<5% = 0, 5%‐33% = 1, 33%‐66% = 2, and >66% = 3); lobular inflammation (no foci = 0, <2 foci per 200× field = 1, 2‐4 foci per 200× field = 2, >4 foci per 200× field = 3); and hepatocyte ballooning (none = 0, few balloon cells = 1, many cells/prominent ballooning = 2).17

2.6. Statistical analyses

Differences in clinicopathological findings were tested with the Mann‐Whitney U‐test and Fisher's exact probability method. Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate recurrence‐free survival rates, and between‐group differences in the survival were evaluated by log‐rank test. Cox's proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis.

Variables potentially associated with recurrence were selected based on previous study results or on our own clinical experience5, 8 and included age (<65 or ≥65 years); gender; history of alcohol abuse (i.e. intake of at least 86 g of ethanol daily for at least 10 years); hepatitis B core (HBc) antibody positivity; interval from the end of IFN therapy to the detection of HCC (≤5 or >5 years); alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity (≤30 or >30 IU/L); total bilirubin (T‐Bil) level (≤1.0 or >1.0 mg/dL); albumin concentration (≥4.0 or <4.0 g/dL); platelet count (>15 × 104 or ≤15 × 104/mL); serum alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) (≤20 or >20 ng/mL); largest diameter of the main tumor (>2.0 or ≤2.0 cm); single or multiple tumors, including intrahepatic metastases; microscopic vascular invasion; degree of differentiation of the main tumor (well‐differentiated, moderate, or poor), grading (0‐2 or 3‐4); staging (0‐3 or 4; liver cirrhosis); steatosis (negative 0 or positive 1‐3); lobular inflammation (negative 0/1 or positive 2/3); ballooning (negative 0 or positive 1/2); and type of hepatic resection (i.e. anatomical resection, including hemihepatectomy, sectoriectomy, or segmentectomy or limited non‐anatomical resection).

Influence of metabolic syndrome‐related variables and clinical and pathological characteristics on recurrence‐free survival was analyzed. P‐values were derived from two‐tailed tests, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Patient characteristics

Clinicopathological characteristics of the 59 patients are shown in Table S1. Mean age was 66 years (range, 48‐76 years), 48 were men and 11 women, 31% were obese, 29% had diabetes mellitus, 20% had dyslipidemia, and 44% had hypertension. Twenty‐seven patients had hepatic steatosis scores of 0, 17 had scores of 1, 11 had scores of 2, and four had scores of 3.

3.2. Survival outcomes

The 3‐, 5‐, and 7‐year recurrence‐free survival rates after surgery were 65%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. Twenty‐nine patients (49%) experienced recurrence, all of which were in the remnant liver. Univariate analysis showed that obesity (P < .01), hypertension (P = .038), and non‐anatomical resection (P = .022) were significantly associated with a lower recurrence‐free survival rate (Table 1). Recurrence‐free survival in obese and non‐obese patients is shown in Figure 1. Multivariate analysis found that obesity (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3‐6.1; P < .01) and non‐anatomic resection (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI 1.1‐6.2; P = .025) were independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence (Table 2).

Table 1.

Recurrence‐free survival after surgery in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Variable Number MST (days) Survival rate (years) P‐value
3 5 7
Age (years)
<65 21 3102 67 51 51 .72
≥65 38 1644 64 41 36
Gender
Female 11 1639 80 50 50 .60
Male 48 1339 61 42 38
Alcohol abuse
Presence 13 1319 53 35 23 .26
Absence 46 1784 69 47 47
Diabetes mellitus
Presence 17 1319 59 49 33 .44
Absence 42 1644 67 43 43
Obesity
Presence 18 731 30 22 22 <.01
Absence 41 1996 75 54 49
Dyslipidemia
Presence 12 NA 81 65 65 .22
Absence 47 1339 61 40 36
Hypertension
Presence 26 1303 50 35 28 .038
Absence 33 3102 76 51 51
HBc antibody
Positive 33 1639 74 43 43 .61
Negative 26 1784 52 46 39
Interval from IFNa (years)
≤5 39 1324 59 38 38 .22
>5 20 1996 77 55 47
T‐Bil (mg/dL)
<1.0 48 1339 60 41 38 .49
≥1.0 11 3102 82 53 53
Albumin (g/dL)
<4.0 14 1324 63 45 45 .88
≥4.0 45 1644 65 44 40
Platelet count (×104/mL)
<15 29 1319 62 41 35 .30
≥15 30 1784 68 48 48
ALT (IU/L)
>30 21 1784 68 46 46 .42
≤30 38 1639 63 42 37
α‐Fetoprotein (ng/mL)
>20 17 1784 55 46 46 .83
≤20 42 1639 69 43 38
Tumor size (cm)
>2.0 29 1303 54 45 45 .93
≤2.0 30 1644 75 38 30
Differentiation degreeb
Well, mod 45 1644 67 45 40 .72
Poor 14 1263 56 40 40
No. tumors
Single 50 1784 67 48 44 .075
Multiple 9 945 50 17 17
MVI
Presence 18 3102 59 59 59 >.99
Absence 41 1639 67 38 33
Hepatic steatosis
Positive 32 1319 56 43 37 .32
Negative 27 1784 75 46 46
Lobular inflammation
Positive 47 NA 62 41 41 .37
Negative 12 1324 75 64 54
Ballooning
Positive 24 1324 59 39 31 .33
Negative 35 1644 69 47 47
Liver cirrhosis
Presence 15 1028 44 44 44 .37
Absence 44 1644 72 44 40
Type of hepatic resection
Non‐anatomical 37 1303 51 25 25 .022
Anatomical 22 NA 79 66 60
a

Interval from the end of interferon therapy to the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

b

Tumor differentiation: well, well‐differentiated; mod, moderately differentiated; poor, poorly differentiated.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBc, hepatitis B core; IFN, interferon; MST, median survival time; MVI, microvascular invasion; NA, not applicable; T‐Bil, total bilirubin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Recurrence‐free survival rates after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in obese (n = 18) and non‐obese patients (n = 41)

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of the patient characteristics associated with postoperative recurrence

Multivariate risk ratioa P‐value
Obesity 2.8 (1.3‐6.1) <.01
Non‐anatomical resection 2.7 (1.1‐6.2) .025
a

Risk ratio (95% confidence interval).

The 3‐, 5‐, and 7‐year overall survival rates after surgery were 100%, 89%, and 77%, respectively. A total of 11 patients died during the study period, nine as a result of cancer‐related causes and two from other causes. Among obese patients, all five patients died of cancer‐related causes. The 3‐, 5‐, and 7‐year overall survival rates after surgery were 100%, 80%, and 64% in obese patients and 100%, 92%, and 82% in non‐obese patients, respectively (P = .014). Other variables showed no significant difference in the overall survival rate (Table S2).

3.3. Characteristics of obese and non‐obese patients

Obesity was an independent risk factor for recurrence in this patient series (Table 3). Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics of obese and non‐obese patients showed that age, gender ratio, history of alcohol abuse, presence of diabetes mellitus, tumor characteristics, and type of surgery in obese and non‐obese patients were not significantly different. However, the prevalence of hepatic steatosis was significantly higher in obese patients (72%) than in non‐obese patients (56%) (P = .023). Furthermore, we evaluated the change in BMI after surgery in obese and non‐obese patients. Of 59 patients, 50 patients had body weight measurements taken at 3, 6, or 12 months after surgery without recurrence. In obese patients (n = 17), median pre‐ and postoperative BMI were 27.2 (range, 25.2‐32.5 kg/m2) and 26.8 (range, 24.4‐33.3 kg/m2), respectively. (P = .58) In non‐obese patients (n = 33), median pre‐ and postoperative BMI were 22.6 (range, 18.7‐24.8 kg/m2) and 23 (range, 18.6‐25.4 kg/m2), respectively. (P = .93) No significant difference in BMI change after surgery was confirmed in obese and non‐obese patients. Among obese patients, improvement of obesity (from BMI ≥25 kg/m2 to BMI < 25 kg/m2) was observed in four patients. Median recurrence‐free and overall survival times were 26.8 months and 85.9 months in patients with improvement of obesity (n = 4), and 19.6 months and 84.7 months in patients without improvement of obesity (n = 13), respectively.

Table 3.

Characteristics of obese and non‐obese patients with chronic hepatitis C

Variable Obese patients (n = 18) Non‐obese patients (n = 41) P‐value
Gender (male/female) 15/3 33/8 >.99
Age (years)
≥65 (n = 38) 14 24 .24
<65 (n = 21) 4 17
Alcohol abuse (+/−) 6/12 7/34 .19
Diabetes mellitus (+/−) 8/10 9/32 .12
Dyslipidemia (+/−) 2/16 10/31 .31
Hypertension (+/−) 10/8 16/25 .27
HBc antibody (+/−) 7/11 26/15 .096
Interval from IFNa (years)
≤5 10 29 .37
>5 8 12
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
<1.0 (n = 48) 14 34 .72
≥1.0 (n = 11) 4 7
Albumin (g/dL)
<4.0 (n = 12) 5 9 .74
≥4.0 (n = 40) 13 32
Platelet count (×104/mL)
<15 (n = 29) 12 17 .095
≥15 (n = 30) 6 24
ALT (IU/L)
>30 (n = 21) 7 14 .77
≤30 (n = 38) 11 27
α‐Fetoprotein (ng/mL)
>20 (n = 17) 7 10 .35
≤20 (n = 42) 11 31
Tumor size (cm)
>2.0 (n = 29) 11 18 .27
≤2.0 (n = 30) 7 23
Differentiation degree (well, mod/poor)b 11/7 34/7 .098
Tumor no. (single/multiple) 16/2 34/7 .71
MVI (+/−) 5/13 13/28 >.99
Hepatic steatosis (+/−) 14/4 18/23 .023
Lobular inflammation (+/−) 16/2 31/10 .31
Ballooning (+/−) 9/9 15/26 .40
Grading score (0‐1 or 2‐4) 9/9 26/15 .40
Liver cirrhosis (+/−) 7/11 8/33 .19
Anatomical resection (+/−) 5/13 17/24 .39
a

Interval from the end of interferon therapy to the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

b

Tumor differentiation: well, well‐differentiated; mod, moderately differentiated; poor, poorly differentiated.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBc, hepatitis B core; IFN, interferon; MVI, microvascular invasion.

3.4. Patterns of recurrence

Table 4 compares the prevalence of the site of recurrence and number of recurrent nodules between obese and non‐obese patients. In obese patients, NR and DR were identified in two patients (16.7%) and 10 patients (83.3%), respectively. In non‐obese patients, NR and DR were identified in five patients (29.4%) and 12 patients (70.6%), respectively. A solitary nodule of recurrence was observed in seven obese patients (58.3%) and in 13 non‐obese patients (76.5%). Furthermore, NR with multiple nodules was observed in one obese patient (8.3%) and in two non‐obese patients (11.8%), and DR with solitary nodule was observed in six obese patients (50.0%) and in seven non‐obese patients (41.2%).

Table 4.

Recurrence patterns of obese and non‐obese patients

Characteristic Obese patients (n = 18) (%) Non‐obese patients (n = 41) (%) P‐value
Recurrence 12 (66.7) 17 (41.5) .095
Site of recurrencea
Near resection site 2 (16.7) 5 (29.4) .66
Distant from resection site 10 (83.3) 12 (70.6)
No. of recurrent nodulesa
Solitary 7 (58.3) 13 (76.5) .42
Multiple 5 (41.7) 4 (23.5)
No. and site of recurrencea
Multiple recurrences near resection site 1 (8.3) 2 (11.8) >.99
Solitary recurrence distant from resection site 6 (50.0) 7 (41.2) .72
a

Percentage of all recurrences.

Table 5 compares the prevalence of the site of recurrence and number of recurrent nodules between patients with anatomical and non‐anatomical resections. All eight patients with anatomical resection experienced DR (100%). Among patients who received non‐anatomical resection, NR and DR were identified in seven patients (33.3%) and 14 patients (66.7%), respectively. A solitary nodule of recurrence was observed in seven anatomical patients (87.5%) and in 13 non‐anatomical patients (61.9%). NR with multiple nodules was observed only in three patients (14.3%) with non‐anatomical resection. DR with a solitary nodule was observed in seven anatomical patients (87.5%) and in nine non‐anatomical patients (42.9%).

Table 5.

Recurrence patterns of anatomical and non‐anatomical resection

Characteristic Anatomical resection (n = 22) (%) Non‐anatomical resection (n = 37) (%) P‐value
Recurrence 8 (36.4) 21 (56.8) .18
Site of recurrencea
Near resection site 0 (0) 7 (33.3) .14
Distant from resection site 8 (100) 14 (66.7)
No. of recurrent nodulesa
Solitary 7 (87.5) 13 (61.9) .37
Multiple 1 (12.5) 8 (38.1)
No. and site of recurrencea
Multiple recurrences near resection site 0 (0) 3 (14.3) >.99
Solitary recurrence distant from resection site 7 (87.5) 9 (42.9) .044
a

Percentage of all recurrences.

4. DISCUSSION

Multivariate analysis confirmed obesity and non‐anatomical resection as independent risk factors for postoperative HCC recurrence after successful IFN therapy, as the risk of recurrence was increased 2.8‐ and 2.7‐fold, respectively, in patients with these factors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of obesity as an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence of HCC in patients with an SVR. An SVR might be expected to reduce the background hepatocarcinogenic potential in patients with a history of chronic hepatitis C and HCC surgery,2 as the tumor recurrence rate was 49%, and the recurrence‐free survival was 41% at 7 years after hepatic resection. These results indicate that the risk of HCC recurrence persists for a long time in patients who achieve an SVR.

Obesity may promote hepatocarcinogenesis.6, 7 In a large, population‐based study of more than 1.2 million men, a higher BMI in young adulthood was significantly associated with an increased risk of HCC.18 Ohki et al reported that a BMI >25 was an independent risk factor for HCC development in chronic hepatitis C patients, with a relative risk of 1.86.8 In this study, obese patients had a significantly increased risk of HCC recurrence. The cause of this increased risk is not clear, but adipokine‐related hepatocarcinogenesis might be involved. Obesity has been reported to affect hepatocarcinogenesis through adipose tissue remodeling with the secretion of proinflammatory adipokines and accumulation of ectopic lipids, resulting in liver lipotoxicity.9, 19 Level of serum adiponectin is inversely correlated with BMI, and a low serum adiponectin has been associated with an increase in the risk of various cancers.8, 9 Obesity may also promote hepatocarcinogenesis through hepatic steatosis, which can cause hepatic inflammation by a mechanism similar to that of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis with pathological findings of lobular inflammation and hepatocellular injury (ballooning).20 However, in this study, hepatic steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning were not independently associated with HCC recurrence. One possible reason for this discrepancy is the persistent influence of HCV infection. HCV infection can cause hepatic steatosis, and this steatosis persists even after HCV eradication.3 Another possible reason is the influence of alcohol abuse. Alcohol abuse is known to cause hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis. These factors may have promoted hepatic steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning in this study.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative treatment includes intrahepatic metastasis of original tumors and newly developed tumors (multicentric recurrence).21 Time to recurrence after surgery (early recurrence within 2 years of surgery or late recurrence at 2 or more years after surgery) is commonly used to distinguish the type of recurrence.22 In the present study, recurrence‐free survival showed that the difference in the recurrence rate between obese and non‐obese patients increased, even in the early post‐surgical period. However, on examining the patterns of recurrence between obese and non‐obese patients, multiple recurrences near the resection site were similarly observed between the two groups, whereas solitary recurrence distant from the resection site tended to be more frequently observed in obese patients than in non‐obese patients. Theoretically, recurrence derived from residual micrometastases can develop near the resection site. Furthermore, multiple recurrences near the resection site are considered likely to be a result of intrahepatic metastasis. In contrast, solitary intrahepatic recurrence distant from the resection site may be considered a pattern of multicentric recurrence.22 Therefore, multicentric recurrence may be associated with an increased risk of HCC recurrence in obese patients.

Non‐anatomical resection was also an independent risk factor for HCC recurrence. Anatomical resection along the portal tributaries is considered an effective way to remove occult intrahepatic HCC metastases.23, 24 In the present study, the patients who underwent anatomical resection had no multiple recurrences near the resection site. Furthermore, solitary recurrence distant from the resection site was more frequently observed in the patients who underwent anatomical resection than in those who underwent non‐anatomical resection. Therefore, recurrence derived from micrometastases of the original tumors might be markedly reduced by anatomical resection. We previously reported that anatomical resection might prevent HCC recurrence in patients achieving an SVR and a biochemical response (defined as normal ALT activity) for at least 1 year.25 Similarly, anatomical resection might be recommended for patients with HCC following HCV eradication.

In the present study, several common risk factors for HCC recurrence showed no significant difference between obese and non‐obese patients, including liver‐related factors3, 4 (albumin, ALT, T‐Bil, and liver cirrhosis) and tumor‐related factors23, 25 (AFP, microscopic vascular invasion, and tumor size). Furthermore, recurrence‐free survival rates tended to be more favorable in patients with albumin <4.0 g/dL, microscopic vascular invasion, tumor size >2.0 cm, AFP >20 ng/dL, ALT >30 IU/L, T‐Bil >1.0 mg/dL, and liver cirrhosis. One possible reason for these unexpected findings may be the small patient number. Another possible reason is the exclusion of patients with HCC outside the Milan criteria and the limitation of subjects to SVR patients. Patients who achieve an SVR typically have good liver function. Excluding advanced‐stage HCC patients and including only SVR patients may have reduced the recurrence risk associated with tumor progression and background liver disease in the present study. Positive reactivity of HBc antibody was also reported as a risk factor for HCC recurrence in HCV‐infected patients.26 However, positive reactivity of HBc antibody was not identified as a risk factor for recurrence in the present study. A previous report suggested that occult persistent HBV infection might contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis under conditions of continuous hepatitis caused by HCV.26 In patients with HCV eradication, the hepatocarcinogenic impact of HBc antibody positivity on the synergistic effects with HCV infection may be decreased. Furthermore, the hepatocarcinogenic effect of HBc antibody positivity itself can be obscured by tumor size, multiplicity, vascular invasion, and liver cirrhosis.26 Accumulation of more patients may clarify the influence of HBc antibody positivity on the risk of HCC recurrence in patients achieving SVR.

On comparing the overall survival, obese patients showed a more unfavorable outcome than non‐obese patients. Obesity is considered a risk factor for the development of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and several malignancies,6 which are potentially life‐threatening. However, all causes of death in obese patients were cancer‐related in the present study. Cancer progression might contribute to the poor prognosis in obese patients. Of note, however, Hassan et al reported that obesity did not affect the overall survival of patients with HCC despite an increased risk of HCC development in obese patients.27 In the present study, only obesity was identified as a significant risk factor for death. However, given the small number of deceased patients, the accumulation of more patients and a further investigation will be necessary to confirm the prognostic factors for overall survival.

Improvement of obesity theoretically can be related to less recurrence or better overall survival. However, in the present study, only four patients showed improvement of obesity. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to clarify the impact of improvement of obesity on recurrence or death.

Several limitations associated with the present study warrant mention. First, this study had a retrospective design and enrolled a small number of patients who achieved an SVR. Second, the current results may have been influenced by the long study duration, as medical techniques and treatment approaches may have changed over time. However, the long observational period might have clinical significance in the treatment of SVR patients with HCC. Third, because the treatment of HCV patients with direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) is now the standard of care, the findings might not fully apply to future HCV patients. However, the beneficial effects of DAA on HCC development or recurrence have not been determined.28, 29 This study may be useful as a reference for further investigations of HCC recurrence after achieving SVR induced by DAA.

In conclusion, obesity and non‐anatomical resection were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence after liver resection following successful IFN therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Obesity is an important clinical problem to consider in order to improve postoperative outcomes in such patients.

DISCLOSURE

Conflicts of Interest: Authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Supporting information

 

 

Shinkawa H, Tanaka S, Takemura S, et al. Obesity and recurrence‐free survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after achieving sustained virological response to interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12183

REFERENCES

  • 1. Nathan H, Segev DL, Mayo SC, et al. National trends in surgical procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1998‐2008. Cancer. 2012;118:1838–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, et al. Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of Hepatocarcinogenesis by Interferon Therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:174–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tanaka A, Uegaki S, Kurihara H, et al. Hepatic steatosis as a possible risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma after eradication of hepatitis C virus with antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5180–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kudo M. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus who achieved sustained virological response. Liver Cancer. 2016;5:155–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tokita H, Fukui H, Tanaka A, et al. Risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved a sustained virological response to interferon therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20 752–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Saunders D, Seidel D, Allison M, Lyratzopoulos G. Systematic review: the association between obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma ‐ epidemiological evidence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:1051–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Muto Y, Sato S, Watanabe A, et al. Overweight and obesity increase the risk for liver cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis and long‐term oral supplementation with branched‐chain amino acid granules inhibits liver carcinogenesis in heavier patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2006;35:204–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ohki T, Tateishi R, Sato T, et al. Obesity is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic hepatitis C patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:459–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Karagozian R, Derdak Z, Baffy G. Obesity‐associated mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Metabolism. 2014;63:607–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. WHO Expert Consultation . Appropriate body‐mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S33–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Eckel RH, Alberti KG, Grundy SM, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2010;375:181–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, et al. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol. 1993;9:298–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan . The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Jpn J Surg. 1989;19:98–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC, et al. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology. 1981;1:431–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Desmet VJ, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, Manns M, Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging. Hepatology. 1994;19:1513–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hagstrom H, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. High BMI in late adolescence predicts future severe liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a national, population‐based cohort study in 1.2 million men. Gut 2017;66:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Duan XF, Tang P, Li Q, Yu ZT. Obesity, adipokines and hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1776–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kurosaki M, Hosokawa T, Matsunaga K, et al. Hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis C is a significant risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma independent of age, sex, obesity, fibrosis stage and response to interferon therapy. Hepatol Res. 2010;40:870–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kubo S, Kinoshita H, Hirohashi K, et al. Patterns of and risk factors for recurrence after liver resection for well‐differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: a special reference to multicentric carcinogenesis after operation. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:3212–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sasaki K, Shindoh J, Margonis GA, et al. Effect of background liver cirrhosis on outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e165059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242:252–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kaibori M, Kon M, Kitawaki T, et al. Comparison of anatomic and non‐anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24:616–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kubo S, Tanaka H, Takemura S, et al. Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma detected after successful interferon therapy. Surg Today. 2007;37:285–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kubo S, Nishiguchi S, Hirohashi K, et al. Clinical significance of prior hepatitis B virus infection in patients with hepatitis C virus‐related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:793–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hassan MM, Abdel‐Wahab R, Kaseb A, et al. Obesity early in adulthood increases risk but does not affect outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:119–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. ANRS collaborative study group on hepatocellular carcinoma . Lack of evidence of an effect of direct‐acting antivirals on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: data from three ANRS cohorts. J Hepatol. 2016;65:734–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Conti F, Buonfiglioli F, Scuteri A, et al. Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV‐related cirrhosis treated with direct‐acting antivirals. J Hepatol. 2016;65:727–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

 


Articles from Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES