Ursodeoxycholic acid attenuates 5-fluorouracil-induced mucositis in a rat model

Abstract

Intestinal mucositis is a commonly encountered complication of chemotherapy. However, there are few effective treatments or preventive methods. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) stabilizes cell membranes, acts as an antioxidant and inhibits apoptosis, thereby exerting cytoprotective effects. The aim of the present study was to examine the ability of UDCA to protecting against chemotherapy-associated mucositis. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to five groups: Control, vehicle + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day), 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) and 5-FU + UDCA (500 mg/kg/day). Following randomization, a single dose of 5-FU was injected and varying amounts of UDCA was administered to each group. UDCA was administered orally to rats for 6 days, beginning 1 day prior to 5-FU administration. The rats were sacrificed 1 day following the last UDCA administration and intestinal tissue specimens were prepared for analysis. UDCA administration attenuated body weight loss, decreased inflammatory cytokine levels and curbed intestinal villus damage in the 10 and 100 mg/kg/day groups. When compared with the jejunal villi lengths in the vehicle+5-FU group (212.8±58.0 µm), those in the 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day) and 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) groups were significantly greater [331.3±18.0 µm (P=0.001) and 310.0±112.6 µm (P=0.046), respectively]. Tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were reduced in the 10 and 100 mg/kg/day UDCA groups (P<0.05). UDCA considerably attenuated the elevation in inflammatory cytokines and intestinal villus damage. The results of the study suggest that UDCA may be used as a protective agent against chemotherapy-associated intestinal mucositis.

Introduction

Intestinal mucositis is an important safety concern in patients undergoing chemotherapy. It can lead to considerable diarrhea and dehydration, which could lead to poor overall health (1–3). However, there are few effective treatments or preventive methods. Chemotherapy-induced mucositis can limit the dose of chemotherapy and increase the risk of infection or hospitalization. Consequently, mucositis during chemotherapy could increase clinical and economic burdens (4).

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a frequently prescribed anticancer agent; however, it commonly causes chemotherapy-related mucositis. Approximately 80% of patients subjected to chemotherapy with 5-FU develop chemotherapy-induced mucositis (5). Inflammation, ulceration, and bleeding can occur throughout the digestive tract, particularly in the small intestine (6).

The present therapy for chemotherapy-associated mucositis mainly consists of topical analgesics, mucosal coating agents, antimicrobials, and cryotherapy (7). Recent studies have reported that chemotherapy-induced mucositis improves with keratinocyte growth factor and rhubarb extract in murine models (6–10). Current treatment methods for chemotherapy-induced mucositis usually aim to decrease the symptoms, rather than providing a complete cure. Thus, it is necessary to discover novel therapies for preventing or reducing this complication associated with chemotherapy.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a physiological component present in trace amounts in human bile and has been prescribed in patients with various liver diseases (11–13). It stabilizes cell membranes, inhibits apoptosis, and acts as an antioxidant, thereby exerting cytoprotective effects (14–20). A previous study reported that UDCA protects against experimental ileitis by attenuating oxidative stress and intestinal barrier dysfunction (21).

We hypothesized that the direct cytoprotective effect of UDCA could protect against mucosal injury during chemotherapy. The aim of present study was to examine the ability of UDCA in protecting against chemotherapy-associated mucositis by using an animal model.

Materials and methods

Animal trial

We randomized 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats (120–130 g) to the following five groups with six rats in each group: Control (group A; n=6), 5-FU (group B; n=6), 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day) (group C; n=6), 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) (group D; n=6), and 5-FU + UDCA (500 mg/kg/day) (group E; n=6). The rats were housed in a room maintained at a temperature of 24±2°C, photoperiod of 12 h, and humidity of 60±5%. Water and food were provided ad libitum. On day 7 of the experiment (i.e., 24 h after the last dose of UDCA or its vehicle), the rats were sacrificed through CO₂ asphyxiation with a flow rate of ~10-30% of the chamber volume per minute, and histological and hematological analyses were performed (Fig. 1B). The Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Korea University Anam Hospital approved this protocol (permit no. KUIACUC-2015-122).

Figure 1.

Study flowchart and protocol. (A) Thirty rats were used in the study, with six rats in each group. In group A, physiological saline was administered through intraperitoneal injection and 10 ml of vehicle was administered orally. Rats in group B were orally administered 10 ml of UDCA vehicle. 5-FU was administered on experimental day 2 to rats in groups B-E. In combination with 5-FU administration, rats in groups C-E were administered UDCA on experimental days 1–6 via oral gavage at the indicated doses. (B) UDCA suspension was administered daily by gavage. UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

Treatment with 5-FU

Gastrointestinal mucositis was induced via the intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU. We injected a single dose of 5-FU on day 2 (400 mg/kg; JW Pharm, Seoul, Korea). Physiological saline was administered to the control group, and 5-FU solution in saline was injected intraperitoneally to rats in the four other experimental groups (Fig. 1A).

UDCA preparation

Suspensions of UDCA (Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) were prepared by adding UDCA to 10 ml of vehicle [0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (JW Pharm) +1% Tween-80 in distilled water]. The vehicle of the same volume was also prepared and administered to rats in the control group. UDCA suspensions were administered daily by gavage for six days; the first dose was administered one day before 5-FU injection.

Diarrhea and body weight assessment

Diarrhea scores and body weights were assessed in all rats from the day of UDCA administration. The occurrence and grade of diarrhea were defined according to the diarrhea assessment (22). Diarrhea score for each rat was evaluated daily as follows: 0, normal stool (normal); 1, considerably moist stool (mild); 2, unformed and wet stool (moderate); and 3, watery stool (severe). The estimated mean scores were used.

Histological analysis

On day 7, we sacrificed the rats and a 2-cm specimen from the proximal lesion of all harvested small intestine was processed and placed in formalin overnight. Then, the resected intestinal specimens were dehydrated, cleared in xylol, embedded in paraffin, and microtomed into sections of constant thickness for staining. Crypt depth and villus height were evaluated using light microscopy (magnification, 100 and ×400, respectively).

Inflammatory cytokine analysis

On day 7, the obtained intestinal tissues were cleansed and stored in RNA later at 4°C before use. cDNA was synthesized using the Superscript^™ II real-time polymerase chain reaction System (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. cDNA synthesis was performed using 500 ng of RNA at 42°C and diluted 1:2 prior to use. Quantitative PCR was carried out using ABI 7900 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primer/TaqMan probe combinations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (reporter sequence ACCCTCACACTCAGATCATCTTCTC) and interleukin (IL)-6 (reporter sequence GGATATAACCAGGAAATTTGCCTAT) were designed for each target sequence. mRNA expression levels were analyzed with the comparative Cq method (23).

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity analysis

MPO activity was calculated by immunohistochemistry according to a method described previously (24). The results are represented as MPO units per high-power field.

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation and percentages. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with the Bonferroni correction, as appropriate. Statistical significance was established at P<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Alteration in body weight and diarrhea score

5-FU administration caused diarrhea and body weight loss (Fig. 2). On day 6, mean body weight reduced to 89.6±1.7% of the original weight, and mean diarrhea score was 1.7±0.51. Compared with the 5-FU administration group, the daily administration of UDCA attenuated body weight loss during the experiment in the 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day) (P=0.139) and the 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) groups (P=0.001). Diarrhea score also decreased in the UDCA groups.

Figure 2.

Assessment of diarrhea score and body weight. All rats were checked daily for (A) body weight loss and (B) severity of diarrhea. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

Histological analysis: Crypt depth and villus height measurements

The evaluation of crypt depth and villus height can indicate the overall severity of mucosal injury. Histological alterations were assessed based on heights of jejunal villi. 5-FU induced considerable alterations in the mucosa (Fig. 3). Compared with the 5-FU group, the UDCA co-administration group showed a higher and an intact epithelial layer. Compared to the jejunal villi lengths in the vehicle + 5-FU group (212.8±58.0 µm), those in the 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) and 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day) groups were significantly greater [310.0±112.6 (P=0.046) and 331.3±18.0 µm (P=0.001), respectively]. The weight-to-length ratio of the resected intestinal tissue section was also increased in UDCA co-administration groups compared with that in the 5-FU only group.

Figure 3.

Histological features of the resected intestine and villus height and weight-to-length ratio of the resected specimen according to groups. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed in samples from the (A) Control, (B) 5-FU, (C) 5-FU + UDCA (10 mg/kg/day), (D) 5-FU + UDCA (100 mg/kg/day) and (E) 5-FU + UDCA (500 mg/kg/day) groups. Histological examination of the jejunal villi and crypts are presented (magnification, ×100). (F) Villus height and (G) W/L ratio of the resected jejunal specimen were measured. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. the 5-FU group. W/L, weight-to-length; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid.

Hematological analysis

Hematological analysis revealed that white blood cell (WBC) count significantly reduced in the 5-FU group compared with the control group (P<0.05) (Fig. 4A). However, WBC count was also reduced in the UDCA groups. red blood cell (RBC) count and hemoglobin level were not different among the groups (Fig. 4B, C).

Figure 4.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on hematology, levels of inflammatory cytokines, and MPO levels in different groups. (A) White blood cell count, (B) red blood cell count and (C) hemoglobin level. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Secreted (D) interleukin-6 and (E) tumor necrosis factor-α mRNA levels. Data are represented as fold-changes relative to the control. (F) MPO activity. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. the control; ^#P<0.05 vs. the 5-FU group. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

Inflammatory cytokine analysis

The mRNA expression of IL-6 and TNF-α was increased by approximately two-fold because of 5-FU (Fig. 4D and E). UDCA administration (100 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced the 5-FU-mediated mRNA expression of both TNF-α and IL-6 (P<0.05).

MPO activity

The activity of MPO (number of MPO-positive cells per high-power field) was compared among the groups (Fig. 4F). MPO activity significantly decreased in the 100 and 10 mg/kg/day UDCA groups compared with corresponding levels in the 5-FU group (P<0.05).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of UDCA against chemotherapy-associated intestinal mucositis. Our results showed that UDCA attenuates chemotherapy-induced reduction in villus height and decreases levels of inflammatory cytokines and MPO activity.

5-FU is frequently used for treating gastrointestinal malignancy. However, approximately 80% of patients subjected to chemotherapy with 5-FU develop chemotherapy-induced mucositis (5). This adverse effect can worsen the quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy and can cause an early cessation of chemotherapy. Therefore, effective preventive and therapeutic agents against chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis are needed.

UDCA has demonstrated efficacy in numerous types of hepatic disorders, without considerable adverse effects upon long-term administration (25–27). The exact mechanism of UDCA in improving hepatic dysfunction remains to be established; however, some assumptions have been made. In these hypotheses, UDCA has been suggested to protect the liver from the toxic effect of hydrophobic bile acids by altering the organization of the bile acid pool (28–30). Further, UDCA exerts a direct cytoprotective action by acting as an antioxidant, inhibiting apoptosis, and stabilizing membranes (14–17). UDCA decreased oxidative stress and intestinal permeability in an indomethacin-induced ileitis model, relieved ibuprofen-induced enteropathy, and improved trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid sodium salt-induced colitis (21,31,32). These effects coupled with its long-term safety have valuable implications and highlight the potential of UDCA as a therapeutic agent in non-hepatic disorders (26,27,33).

Consistent with previous findings, 5-FU administration in this study led to considerable small bowel mucositis. The induced mucositis was characterized by villus height reduction and damage to crypts in the small intestine. The co-administration of UDCA attenuated the degree of 5-FU-induced mucosal injury and associated clinical symptoms, such as body weight reduction and diarrhea. Therefore, UDCA co-administration may be effective in treating 5-FU-associated intestinal mucositis and its associated manifestations.

Regarding the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-associated intestinal mucositis, several pathogenic components have been suggested to present direct cytotoxicity, and stimulate abnormal inflammation and hypoproliferation (2,34,35). 5-FU-induced apoptosis could be provoked by the initiation of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, which is mediated by inflammatory cytokines (36). Previous studies have shown that apoptosis caused by 5-FU administration is substantially ameliorated through the inhibition of cytokines (37–39). In the current study, UDCA co-administration (100 mg/kg/day) reduced levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the small intestine. This indicated that UDCA may protect against chemotherapy-associated mucositis by decreasing the levels of inflammatory cytokines.

The dose of UDCA was decided based on a previous report that UDCA at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day relieves intestinal inflammation (40); however, the opposite effect occurs at a dose of approximately 400 mg/kg/day (41). An investigation with colitis models indicated that UDCA at doses of 10–50 mg/kg/day ameliorates enteropathy, whereas UDCA at a dose of 400 mg/kg/day induces cell membrane damage and solubilization due to an increase in hydrophobic bile acid, resulting from an increase in secondary bile acid levels. In the current study, UDCA at doses of 100 and 10 mg/kg/day exerted a protective effect against chemotherapy-induced mucositis, as indicated by an improvement in reduced villus height. The optimal dose should be established for chemotherapy-associated mucositis.

The present study has limitations, including the lack of assessment of other roles of UDCA in the prevention of chemotherapy-associated mucositis. Furthermore, effects on the intestine of UDCA alone at different doses were not evaluated.

However, to accurately evaluate the action of UDCA in chemotherapy-induced mucositis, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and damage to mucosal components were assessed. The current findings demonstrated the protective effect of UDCA against chemotherapy-associated mucositis. Further studies are necessary to investigate other roles of UDCA against chemotherapy-associated mucositis and to confirm the ideal dose.

UDCA is currently prescribed for the treatment of various hepatic diseases without significant adverse events. Owing to its cytoprotective effect, it can be assumed that UDCA can be easily applied to treat chemotherapy-induced mucositis. However, its possible adverse effects, such as skin rash, nephritis, and vasculitis, also should be considered (42).

In conclusion, UDCA considerably decreased inflammatory cytokine levels, intestinal villus damage, and MPO activity. These results highlight the possibility of UDCA, at a suitable dose, as a protective agent against chemotherapy-associated intestinal mucositis.

Glossary

Abbreviations

UDCA

ursodeoxycholic acid

5-FU

5-fluorouracil

WBC

white blood cell

RBC

red blood cell

MPO

myeloperoxidase

IL

interleukin

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

Funding

The present study was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (Korea) under the Industrial Technology Innovation ‘Development of diagnostic device for functional dyspepsia based on Korean-Western medicine fusion abdominal diagnosis’ (grant no. 10060251), and by Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. (Seoul, Korea).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

SHK, BK and HJC designed the research, and SHK and BK performed the experiments. ESK, YTJ, HSL and CDK assisted in data acquisition, and creating the tables and figures. HSC, YSS and SHU analyzed the data. SHK wrote the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experiments at Korea University Anam Hospital (approval no. KUIACUC-2015-122).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea) provided the UDCA used in the experiments and also financially supported the present study.