Skip to main content
Italian Journal of Food Safety logoLink to Italian Journal of Food Safety
. 2018 Jul 3;7(2):7223. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2018.7223

Antimicrobial resistance, biofilm synthesis and virulence genes in Salmonella isolated from pigs bred on intensive farms

Elena Barilli 1, Cristina Bacci 1,, Zulena StellaVilla 1, Giuseppe Merialdi 2, Mario D’Incau 3, Franco Brindani 1, Alice Vismarra 1
PMCID: PMC6036996  PMID: 30046559

Abstract

Salmonella is the second cause of food-borne infection in humans in the USA and Europe. Pigs represent the second most important reservoir for the pathogen and the consumption of pork meat is a major risk factor for human salmonellosis. Here, we evaluated the virulence patterns of eleven Salmonella isolated from pigs (carcasses and faces) bred in intensive farms in the north of Italy. The two serotypes identified were S. Typhimurium and its monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:-. None of the isolates was an ESBL producer, as confirmed also by PCR. However, the presence of a multi-drug resistant pattern was evident, with all the isolates being resistant to at least to five antimicrobial agents belonging to various classes. Moreover, six out of eleven isolates showed important resistance profiles, such as resistance against colistin and ciprofloxacin, with nine to twelve recorded resistances. The isolates were negative for the biofilm synthesis test, while four different virulotypes were characterized. All the isolates showed the presence of invA, hilA, stn, ssrA, sipC. One sample also harbored ssaR and spvC genes. One strain was positive for all the virulence genes tested and was resistant to 12 antimicrobial agents. The present study contributes new data to the surveillance program for antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the presence of eleven highly virulent isolates poses concern for human health in relation to their diffusion in the environment.

Key words: Salmonella, pigs, antibiotic resistance, biofilm, virulence genes

Introduction

Salmonella is one of the best known foodborne pathogens due to its vast diffusion throughout the world and to its ability to cause both widespread contamination and infection (Pires, 2013). Human salmonellosis ranked second after campylobacteriosis in European Union (EU) with 88715 confirmed cases as reported in the 2015 report on zoonoses and zoonotic agents published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (EFSA and ECDC, 2016).

Salmonella colonizes the intestine of many animals, including mammals, reptiles and birds. Poultry, in particular, serves as an efficient vector for transmission of multiple serovars of Salmonella to human people through the consumption of contaminated foods. Besides poultry, pigs are one of the principle species responsible for the transmission of Salmonella to humans. Salmonella infects pigs following the fecaloral route and enterocolitis is generally the main clinical manifestation. Asymptomatic carriers are an important reservoir for Salmonella on farms. This, together with other factors such as high animal density, poor cleaning and disinfection and poor biosecurity measures, favors the presence of the pathogen. Another critical point is represented by the level of hygiene at the slaughterhouse. Here, cross-contamination of carcasses with faces can occur if relevant food safety regulations are not strictly respected. Control measures aimed at reducing the level of meat contamination, must be applied at all the levels of food chain.

European Regulations (nos.2073/2005 and 217/2014) define the microbiological criteria for several foodborne-pathogens in different foodstuffs, including Salmonella. Moreover, each member state of the EU has activated surveillance programs that monitor the prevalence in different animals, foodstuff and environment, together with the characterization of the serovar and antimicrobial- resistance profile of each isolate, as requested by EFSA and ECDC from 2008. In southern Europe, a large part of confirmed cases of human salmonellosis has been linked to the ingestion of contaminated pork products (43.6% of all cases) (Pires et al., 2011).

Historically, recommended treatment for cases of blood-stream salmonellosis included antimicrobial agents such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Drug resistance, which has spread over the past 20 years, has now limited the use of these antibiotics and quinolone, macrolide, and third-generation cephalosporins are preferred. A further consideration regards multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella, defined as strains with resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes. In Europe, MDR rate is high overall (26.0%), with a peak recorded in France (62.6%), and several serovars exhibited an extremely high rate, including S. Kentucky (74.6%), monophasic S. Typhimurium 1,4,[5],12:i:- (69.4%) and S. Infantis (61.9%) (ECDC/EFSA/EMA, 2017).

According to European legislation, antimicrobial resistance must be monitored on a representative number of isolates of Salmonella enterica from pigs and poultry and foods derived from these species (ECDC/EFSA/EMA, 2017).

There are several mechanisms responsible for the development of resistant bacteria following the pressure of antimicrobial use. Among these, there is the synthesis of hydrolytic enzymes like β- lactamases, the main cause of antibiotic resistance in Gram negative bacteria. Extended-spectrum-β- lactamases (ESBLs) are one of the major determinants of resistance against oxymino-cephalosporins in Enteroba steriaceae. These enzymes are commonly called cephalosporinases, hydrolase penicillins, I-III generation cephalosporins, cephamycins (cefoxitin) and oxyiminocephalosporins (Jacoby et al., 2009). They are encoded by genes (blaTEM, blaCTX-M, blaSHV) located on either plasmids, which can be transferred among bacteria (i.e. during bacterial conjugation), or on chromosomes (Philippon et al., 2002).

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, 2015) has defined a series of antibiotic panels to test, comprising molecules belonging to different families and with different mechanisms of action. The existence of Salmonella strains with remarkable resistance profiles, together with other pathogenic factors such as biofilm synthesis ability, or particular virulence patterns (defined by the presence of specific virulence associated genes) like epithelial cell adhesion, phagocytes and non-phagocytes cell-invasion, is an increasing phenomenon that must be monitored continuously. Salmonella is capable of biofilm formation, which is an important mechanism of resistance to antimicrobials and plays an important role in the virulence of microrganisms (Simm et al., 2014). Furthermore, bacteria that are capable of biofilm formation on food processing surfaces can cause food spoilage or transmission of diseases.

The aims of the present study are (i) to determine the presence of antibiotic resistance by applying an EUCAST panel with disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), (ii) to determine the ability to produce biofilm and (iii) to define virulotypes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) marking specific genes.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

The study was conducted on carcasses (sponges) and faces (swabs) collected from 150 pigs in 6 slaughterhouses located in the Emilia Romagna and Lombardy regions from September 2016 to May 2017. All 300 samples (150 faces and 150 carcasses) were collected following the UNI EN ISO 17604:2015 method, as described by European Regulation CE 2073/2005. Pigs came from intensive farms located in different provinces of northern Italy. Rectal samples were collected in the lairage of the slaughterhouses, using sterile swabs. They were immediately put in a transport container with Buffer Peptone Wa ter (BPW, Biolife Italiana) and were then incubated overnight at 37°C in the lab. Four different carcass sites of 100 cm2 each, as described in annex A of Standard ISO 17604, were swabbed before chilling using a sterile sponge moistened with Buffered Peptone Water (BPW, Biolife Italiana). After sampling, the sponge was placed in a sterile bag and stored at +4°C during transport and was then incubated at 37°C for 18 h ± 2 h in the lab.

Salmonella isolation and serotyping

Isolation of Salmonella from collected samples was carried out according to UNI EN ISO 6579:2008. Positive controls AT CC 13076 (S. Enteritidis) and AT CC 14028 (S. Typhimurium) were used. Biochemical characterization, presence of somatic antigen and oxidase activity were analyzed. Biochemical identification to the genus level was performed by using the API20E® microsubstrate system (bioMérieux, Italia spA).

The complete serological characterization of Salmonella was performed by slide agglutination for the determination of somatic antigens, while, for the determination of flagellar antigens, the method of tube agglutination according to the technique of Spicer (1956), modified by Edwards (1962) and Morris et al. (1972) was followed. The results of the determinations of the antigens were then used for the final serological characterization according to the scheme of Kauffmann - White - Le Minor (Grimont and We i l l, 2007).

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Confirmed colonies of Salmonella were then subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility test for III and IV generation cephalosporins. The disc diffusion test on agar was used in the first part of the study following the protocol defined by EUCAST (2015). Briefly, confirmed Salmonella colonies were seeded onto a nutritive agar (Tryptic Soy Agar-TSA) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. One single colony was put in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) then incubated for 4-6 h at 37°C. The culture-broth was seeded uniformly on Mueller Hinton Agar plates, antimicrobial discs were added and incubated at 37°C for 18±2 h. For the disc diffusion agar test, these antimicrobial agents were selected: Cefotaxime (30 µg), Cefotaxime (30 µg) + Clavulanate (10 µg), Ceftazidime (30 µg), Ceftazidime (30 µg) + Clavulanate (10 µg), Cefepime (30 µg), Cefepime (30 µg) + Clavulanate (10 µg), Amoxicillin (20 µg) + Clavulanate (10 µg), Amoxicillin (20 µg). All isolates were tested for the antimicrobial susceptibility with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). A panel of antibiotic agents was chosen from those proposed by EUCAST (2015), as listed in Table 1 Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim, Ciprofloxacin, Tetracycline, Meropenem, Azithromycin, Nalixidic Acid, Cefotaxime, Chloramphenicol, Tigecycline, Ceftazidime, Colistin, Ampicillin, Gentamicin. A suspension made with one Salmonella colony diluted in sterile water was prepared and incubated at 37°C for 4-6 h. Then, 10 µL of each sample were added to 11 mL of Mueller-Hinton broth and 50 µL of this preparation were added to the SENSITRE micro-plates containing the antimicrobial agents at different concentrations (Thermofisher, USA). The reaction can be read as sensitive-intermediate or resistant.

Table 1.

Salmonella serotypes isolated from faces and carcasses in the North of Italy and MIC results.

Sample Salmonella serovar SMX TMP CIP TET MERO AZI NAL FOT CHL TGC TAZ COL AMP GEN
>4 >4 >0,5 >2 >8 >16 >32 >2 >8 >2 >4 >2 >8 >4
71 FS S. Typhimurium 512 1 0,25 32 0,12 4 16 0,25 8 0,25 2 4 32 32
77 CS S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 1024 32 8 32 0,5 64 128 0,25 64 1 2 4 64 32
86 CS S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 1024 32 1 64 0,25 16 64 0,25 8 4 0,5 8 64 32
88 CS S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 1024 32 0,25 64 0,25 16 32 1 8 4 0,5 16 64 32
90 CS S. Typhimurium 512 8 1 2 0,12 4 64 0,25 16 1 2 1 32 32
97 CS S. Typhimurium 1024 32 0,25 64 0,12 16 128 0,5 128 4 0,5 4 64 32
100 CS S. Typhimurium 1024 16 4 64 0,5 64 128 4 128 1 2 16 64 32
104 CS S. Typhimurium 1024 8 0,12 64 0,25 16 16 1 8 4 2 16 64 32
105 CS S. Typhimurium 1024 32 2 32 0,25 16 128 0,25 128 1 0,5 1 64 32
109 CS S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 1024 32 8 64 0,25 64 128 4 128 8 0,5 16 64 32
118 CS S. Typhimurium 1024 32 4 32 0,12 2 128 1 16 8 2 16 64 32

FS: faeces swab CS: carcasses sponge. SMX: Sulphamethoxazole; TMP: Trimethoprim; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; TET: Tetracycline; MERO: Meropenem; AZI: Azithromycin; NAL: Nalixidic Acid; FOT: Cefotaxime; CHL: Chloramphenicol; TGC: Tigecycline; TAZ: Ceftazidime; COL: Colistin; AMP: Ampicillin; GEN: Gentamicin.

Biofilm synthesis

For examining the formation of bacterial biofilm, the protocol described by Christensen (1985) was applied using a 96-well plate. After biochemical confirmation, a single Salmonella colony was chosen and put in TSB. After 2 h incubation at 37°C, 200 µL of broth were seeded in five wells for each sample. The test for each strain was repeated three times. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h, washed for three times with 300 µL of sterile PBS 1X and subsequently dried for 30 min at 42°C upside down. Two hundred microliters of Crystal Violet stain were added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Plates were then washed as before, and incubated overnight at room temperature away from direct light. The day after 200 µL of 95% ethanol were added to fix the biofilm formation and the plates were read at 620 nm with a spectrophotometer. The cut-off value (ODc) is defined as five standard deviations (SD) above the mean OD of the negative controls. Biofilm formation is classified according to Stepanovic et al. (2000) into categories based upon the ODs obtained: OD ≤ODc, non-adherent; ODc<OD≤2xODc, weak biofilm formation; 2xODc<OD≤4xODc, moderate biofilm formation; and 4xODc<OD, strong biofilm formation. Controls included a well with only medium (negative) and one with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA O 1 (positive).

Genes related to antimicrobial resistance and to virulence factors

One to three colonies of Salmonella on TSA plates were selected and incubated overnight at 37°C in 4 mL of BPW. One millilitre of the culture broth was used for DNA extraction using a commercial kit (Invitrogen, USA).

The isolates of Salmonella were tested for the presence of blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes with a Real-time PCR using oligonucleotides described by Roschansky et al. (2014) with the SsoAdvanced SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad, USA). Preliminary tests to define the correct annealing temperature for each primer were done. In each reaction positive (K. pneumoniae NCTC 13368 for blaSHV, E. coli NTCT 13351 for blaTEM, E. coli NTCT 13353 for blaCTX-M) and negative controls were added and the presence of aspecific products was avoided through melting curve analysis. The amplification protocol was characterized by a denaturation step (95°C for 30 s) and 35 repeated cycles (95°C for 10 s; 60°C for 10 s; 72°C for 30 s; 40°C for 30 s). Fluorescence signals were collected in every cycle and each sample was tested in fourfold.

The identification of virulence genes (invA, hilA, SpvC, SipA, Stn, pefA, rck, sipC, ssaR, ssrA, sopB) was done using a series of primers reported in Table 2. A classic PCR end-point protocol was applied, adapting the annealing temperatures and the elongation time (at 72°C for each cycle) in accordance with oligonucleotides single properties.

Table 2.

Oligonucleotide sequences with annealing temperatures and molecular weight used for ESBL-genes and virulence associated-genes.

Oligonucleotid e Primer sequence 5’- 3’ Annealing temperature (°C) Amplicon size (bp) Reference
Class A b- lactamase blaCTX-M F-CGATGTGCAGTACCAGTAA 50 192 Roschanski et al., 2014
genes (multiplex R-TTAGTGACCAGAATCAGCGG
real-time PCR) blaTEM F- GCATCTTACGGATGGCATGA R- GTCCTCCGATCGTTGTCAGAA 50 100 Roschanski et al., 2014
blaSHV F- TCCCATGATGAGCACCTTTAAA R- TCCTGCTGGCGATAGTGGAT 50 104 Roschanski et al., 2014
Virulence genes invA F-ACAGTGCTCGTTTACGACCTGAAT 60 243 Chiu et al., 2006
(End-point PCR) R-AGACGACTGGTACTGATCGATAAT
HilA F-CGTGAAGGGATTATCGCAGT R-GTCCGGGAATACATCTGAGC 56 96 Wang et al., 2009
SpvC F-ACTCCTTGCACAACCAAATGCGGA R-TGTCTCTGCATTTCGCCACCATCA 56 571 Chiu et al., 2006
SipA F-CCATTCGACTAACAGCAGCA R-CGGTCGTACCGGCTTTATTA 56 449 Wang et al., 2009
Stn F-TTGTCTCGCTATCACTGGCAACC R-ATTCGTAACCCGCTCTCGTCC 59 617 Prager et al., 1995
pefA F-TTGCACTGGGTGGTTCTGG R-TGTAACCCACTGCGAAAG 56 485 Heithoof et al., 2008
rck F-AACGGACGGAACACAGAGTC R-TGTCCTGACGAAAGTGCATC 59 189 Capuano et al., 2013
sipC F-AGACAGCTTCGCAATCCGTT R-ATTCATCCCTTCGCGCATCA 60 446 Fardsanei et al., 2017
ssaR F-GTTCGGATTTGCTTCGG R-TCTCCAGTGACTAACCCTAACCAA 59 1628 Hu et al., 2008
ssrA F-CTTACGATTACGCCATTTACGG R-ATTTGGTGGAGCTGGCGGGAGT 58 706 Kutsukake et al., 2006
sopB F-CCTCAAGACTCAAGATG R-TACGCAGGAGTAAATCGGTG 56 1987 Raffatellu et al., 2005

Results

Eleven strains of Salmonella were isolated from intensively-bred pigs at slaughter, one from faces (0.66%; CI 95%=0.12-3.68) and ten from carcasses (6.6%; CI 95%=3.6-11.8). Two serovars were identified: S. Typhimurium and S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:-, as reported in Table 1.

The disc diffusion test performed for the identification of resistance patterns against III and IV generation cephalosporins gave negative results. None of the Salmonella isolated produced ESBLs, data confirmed also through the Real-time PCR reactions for blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes.

The results of the MIC test showed that all the Salmonella isolated on swine carcasses showed resistance towards ulfamethoxazole (SMX), ampicillin (AMP) and gentamicin (GEN) (Table 1). The S. Typhimurium isolated from faeces showed resistance to the same antibiotics and to tetracycline (TET) and colistine (COL). All the Salmonella isolated from carcasses were resistant to trimethoprim (TMP) while meropenem (MERO) and ceftazidime (TAZ) were still effective against the isolates tested. Resistance against quinolones was recorded in seven and eight isolates from carcasses for ciprofloxacin (CIP) and nalixidic acid (NAL), respectively, with high MIC values. Seven and six isolates were also strongly resistant to chloramphenicol (CHL) and to the macrolide tigecycline (TGC), with MIC values ranging from 2 to 16 times higher than the cut-off for CHL and 2 to 4 times higher than the limit for TGC. Only three out of eleven isolates were resistant to azithromycin (AZI). All the isolates were resistant at least to five antimicrobial agents, belonging to different classes. Moreover, six out of eleven isolates showed important resistance profiles, as reported in Table 1. None of the isolates synthesized biofilm. Data for virulence genes pattern are reported in Table 3. All the isolates were positive for invA, hilA, stn, ssrA, sipC. All but one strain also harbored ssaR and spvC genes. A total of four virulo-types were defined, as shown in Table 4. The majority of the strains (6/11) were in the first group with negative signal for genes pefA and rck. Three isolates showed another specific pattern (virulotype 2) characterized by the absence of sipA gene. Two strains of S. Typhimurium had two singular genetic profiles. One strain harbored all the genetic loci investigated, while in the second strain genes pefA, rck, ssaR, spvC and sopB were all negative in PCR.

Table 3.

Virulence genes identified by PCR in the isolates.

Sample invA HilA pefA rck Stn ssrA ssaR spvC sipA sipC sopB
S. Typhimurium 71 FS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 77 CS + + + + + + + + - + +
S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 86 CS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 88 CS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium 90 CS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium 97 CS + + + + + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium 100 CS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium 104 CS + + - - + + + + + + +
S. Typhimurium 105 CS + + + + + + + + - + +
S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- 109 CS + + + + + + + + - + +
S. Typhimurium 118 CS + + - - + + - - + + -

Table 4.

Most commonly detected haplotype in the isolates.

invA HilA pefA rck Stn ssrA ssaR spvC sipA sipC sopB Number of isolates/tot
Virulotype 1 + + - + + + + + + 6/11
Virulotype 2 + + + + + + + + - + + 3/11
Virulotype 3 + + + + + + + + + + + 1/11
Virulotype 4 + + - -+ + - - + + - 1/11

Discussion

Salmonella continues to be the second foodborne pathogen cause of illnesses in US and in Europe (Scallan et al., 2011; EFSA and ECDC, 2016). Therefore, continuous monitoring of isolates is increasingly necessary, in order to study not only the prevalence of Salmonella in the environment, but more importantly its virulence patterns.

In the present study, Salmonella was isolated from 10 pig carcasses and one feces swab out of 300 samples analyzed. Higher percentages (49.3%) were reported by Bonardi et al. (2016) in a study conducted from June to October from faces collected in the lairage and not directly from the rectum, as in the present study. This could justify the low prevalence we reported, together with the fact that the majority of the sampling was done during the winter months. A recent study published by van Damme et al. (2018) showed that 31% of rectal samples was positive for Salmonella, but most of them were only slightly contaminated, in the range between -1 and 0 Log CFU/g. Two serotypes have been identified: S. Typhimurium (63.6%) and S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- (36.4%). Of the 2401 serotyped Salmonella isolated from pigs in Europe (EU) in 2015, 56.9% were S. Typhimurium and this percentage is congruent with our data. S. Derby was the second most common serovar identified, followed by the group of monophasic strains of S. Typhimurium (EFSA and ECDC, 2016). Results from pork meat samples and carcasses analyzed in the EU suggest that the percentage of S. Typhimurium isolates is decreasing year by year (from 39.3% of serotyped isolates in 2011 to 23.0% in 2014). This contrasts with the percentage of reported monophasic strains of S. Typhimurium, which has increased from 2.6% to 22.3% in 2015, and also with our data. Considering human cases of salmonellosis, the main serovars isolated in 2015 were S. Enteritidis (44.4%), S. Typhimurium (17.4%) and its monophasic variant (7.8%). Similar data were presented by the WHO (Anonymous: SalmSurv-Salmonella Surveillance network www.who.int) from 2006 to 2010 with S. Enteritidis as the most common serotype worldwide (65%), followed by S. Typhimurium (12%).

Data recorded here confirm that antibiotic resistance is still growing and evolving. All the isolates were resistant to at least five antibiotic agents, belonging to different classes, in particular 81% of the strains were resistant to colistin, a life-saving drug, and 63% were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance towards colistin in Salmonella isolates in EU was recorded by several member states in 2016. The Netherlands and Italy also reported colistin-resistant Salmonella isolates in the 5.9% and 21.5% respectively of the isolates causing infection in humans (ECDC/EFSA/EMA, 2017). In pigs, resistance to colistin was also found in Salmonella and E. coli isolated in UK (Anjum et al., 2016). Quinolone resistant bacteria, spread through the ingestion of contaminated food, have been shown to have an impact on the management of human infections (Fabrega et al., 2008). As reported in the last ECDC/EFSA/EMA document, the proportions of Salmonella isolates in human salmonellosis resistant to ciprofloxacin (quinolone) and cefotaxime (third generation cephalosporin) was overall relatively low (8.8% resistant to ciprofloxacin and 1.1% to cefotaxime). However, the report highlighted that ciprofloxacin resistance more than doubled compared to 2013 (when it was 3.8%). In the present study, resistance to quinolones was recorded for ciprofloxacin (CIP) and nalixidic acid (NAL), also with high values of MIC. Considering third generation cephalosporins, the last ECDC/EFSA/EMA report showed that Italy and Netherlands referred a percentage of resistance for Salmonella higher than all other EU countries for 2016. However, in the present study ceftazidime was still effective. Acquired resistance to cephalosporins and other life-saving antibiotic agents are cause of concern due to their elective use for the treatment of children and immunocompromised subjects (ECDC/EFSA/EMA 2017).

None of the isolates was ESBL producers and this was confirmed also by the absence of specific genes tested by Realtime PCR. Diffusion of ESBL-bacteria is widespread in Europe and throughout the world and continuous monitoring is still essential, even if our data are reassuring.

In order to evaluate the potential factors that may contribute to the pathogenicity of S. Typhimurium and the monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:-, 11 virulence genes were investigated. As mentioned before most of the virulence related genes are located on plasmids (pSTV), such as spv operon, or on chromosomal pathogenicity islands (SPIs). Genes such as invA, sipA, sopB and sopE are involved in epithelial cell adhesion, phagocytes and non-phagocytes cell-invasion and are encoded by the SPI-1. SPI-2 encodes for genes such as ssaR and ssrA that favour the survival and replication within macrophages and subsequent systemic spread (Zhang et al., 2003; Yoon et al., 2009).

In this study, all the isolates were positive for at least five virulence-related-genes (invA, hilA, stn, ssrA, sipC). The same phenomenon has been highlighted in S. Typhimurium isolated in swine, where all the strains analysed were positive for sipA, sipD, flgK, flgL,fljB, invA, sopB and sopE2 genes (Almeida et al., 2016).

InvA is a putative inner membrane component of SPI-1, essential for entry into epithelial cells, while hilA is a transcriptional activator essential for the regulation of the invasion process (Galin et al., 1991). All the Salmonella tested were positive for both invA and hilA genes, highlighting the virulence potential of the strains in relation to their ability to be invasive after the attachment to the intestinal epithelium.

Production of another virulence factor like Salmonella enterotoxin is controlled by the expression of a series of genes such as stn. The presence of the gene is not related to a specific serotype (Moore and Feist, 2007) and it was demonstrated that stn is also involved in the maintenance of bacterial membrane composition and integrity. Stn was detected in all the isolates; the same data was found also in Salmonella of different serotypes isolated from both human and animal samples (Murugkar et al., 2003).

SsrA/B is a regulatory system that induces the expression of SPI-2 genes. SsrA, together with ssrB are important virulence factors involved in systemic salmonellosis after intestinal colonization (Boyen et al., 2008). The SPI-2 associated proteins as ssaR, in fact, promote the intracellular replication and systemic spread of the infection in mice. In the present study, all the isolates harbored the two genes (SsrA and ssaR) and almost the same percentage (90%) was reported by Hur and colleagues (2011) on S. Typhimurium isolated from piglets with diarrhea.

SipC is a gene involved in the process of cell adhesion, in the cell invasion process and it also induces a proinflammatory response (Lara-tejero and Galan, 2009). Here, all the isolates were positive for sipC, highlighting one time again the virulence potential of these strains.

The virulence factor sopB is essential for Salmonella enteropathogenicity, causing an acute inflammatory cell influx, intestinal fluid secretion and enteritis that correlate with clinical diarrhea (Zhang et al., 2002). It has been demonstrated that strains carrying mutation of sopB and sopE2 are not able to invade epithelial cell lines (Mirold et al., 2001). SopB was identified in all S. Typhimurium and in the monophasic variant samples isolated in this study, except one. Similar data were carried out also in S. Typhimurium isolated from piglets with diarrhea in Korea, where 96% harbored sopB (Hur et al., 2011).

SpvC is associated with the systemic spread of the infection, favoring the replication in sites as spleen and liver (Foley et al., 2008). In particular, the enzymatic activity of this marker reduces the expression of proinflammatory TH1 cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-12) and neutrophil infiltration in the first stages of infection, leading immune response trends to a TH2 shift (Guiney and Feier, 2011; Wu et al., 2017). The presence of the spvC marker in all the isolates except one, makes these potentially highly virulent because the spvB/spvC genes can help the bacteria to evade host immune defenses, leading to the aggravation of infection. In S. Typhimurium isolated in Spanish broilers, 73.92% were positive for both spvB and spvC (Lamas et al., 2016) while in piglets with acute salmonellosis spvC was detected only in 14% of the isolates (Hur et al., 2011). The isolates identified here came from animals slaughtered for human consumption and the presence of spv operon should be concerning if we consider that some strains of S. enterica pathogenic for humans that carry the same factor are associated with severe disseminated salmonellosis (Foley et al., 2008).

Conclusions

In the present study we highlighted the presence of Salmonella isolated from pigs characterized by a high virulence potential. In fact, considering the high degree of resistance towards antibiotic agents of various classes and with different mechanisms of action, together with numerous virulence genes identified by PCR, Salmonella strains analyzed here are potentially hazardous for human health. The concomitant presence of phenotypic resistance patterns and genes coding for proteins responsible for virulence has to be considered for future evaluation on the circulating strains of Salmonella due to the potential of these strains to pose a serious health risk. Here, for instance, one S. Typhimurium monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:-. was positive for almost all the genetic markers coding for virulence factors and it was resistant to 12 antimicrobial agents, colistin and cefotaxime included. To conclude, we have reported the presence of strains of Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant 1,4,5,12:i:- in our territory characterized by a high virulence potential, mainly related to MDR pattern and to the marked presence of virulence-genes.

Funding Statement

Funding: none.

References

  1. Almeida F, Medeiros MI, Kich JD, Falcão J P, 2016. Virulence-associated genes, antimicrobial resistance and molecular typing of Salmonella Typhimurium strains isolated from swine from 2000 to 2012 in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol 120:1677-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anjum MF, Duggett NA, Abu Oun M, Randall L, Nunez-Garcia J, Ellis RJ, Rogers J, Horton R, Brena C, Williamson S, Martelli F, Davies R, Teale C, 2016. Colistin resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from a pig farm in Great Britain. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2306-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous: SalmSurv-Salmonella Surveillance network. www.who.int. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonardi S, Alpigiani I, Bruini I, Barilli E, Brindani F, Morganti M, Cavallini P, Bolzoni L, Pongolini S, 2016. Detection of Salmonella enterica in pigs at slaughter and comparison with human isolates in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 218:44-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Morgan E, Botteldoorn N, Heyndrickx M, Volf J, Favoreel H, Hernalsteens JP, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F, 2008. A limited role for SsrA/B in persistent Salmonella Typhimurium infections in pigs. Vet Microbiol 128:364-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Capuano F, Mancusi A, Capparelli R, Esposito S, Proroga YT, 2013. Characterization of drug resistance and virulotypes of Salmonella strains isolated from food and humans. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:963-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiu CH, Su LH, Chu CH, Wang MH, Ye h CM, Weill FX, Chu C, 2006. Detection of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage types DT102, DT104, and U302 by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 44:2354-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996-1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crump JA, Medalla FM, Joyce KW, Krueger AL, Hoekstra RM, Whichard JM, Barzilay EJ, 2011. Emerging Infections Program NARMS Working Group. Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 1996 to 2007. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1148-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards PR, 1962. Serologic examination of Salmonella cultures for epidemiologic purposes. Public Health Service Publication. National Communicable Disease Center, Atlanta. [Google Scholar]
  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority European Medicines Agency, 2017. ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals. EFSA Journal 2017 15:4872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), 2015. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, 2015. available at www.eucast.org. [Google Scholar]
  13. European Food Safety Authority European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. The European Union summary report on trends of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA Journal 14:4634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fabrega A, Sanchez-Cespedes J, Soto S, Vila J, 2008. Quinolone resistance in the food chain. Int J Antimicrob Ag 31:307-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fardsanei F, Soltan Dallal MM, Douraghi M, Zahraei Salehi T, Mahmoodi M, Memariani H, Nikkhahi F, 2017. Genetic diversity and virulence genes of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Enteritidis isolated from meats and eggs. Microb Pathog 107:451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R, 2008. Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J Anim Sci 86: E149-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Galin JE, Curtiss R III, 1991. Distribution of the invA, -B, -C, and -D genes of Salmonella Typhimurium among other Salmonella serovars: invA mutants of Salmonella Typhi are deficient for entry into mammalian cells. Infect Immun 59:2901-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grimont PAD, Weill FX, 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars (9th ed.). WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institute Pasteur, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guiney DG, Fierer J, 2011. The Role of the spv Genes in Salmonella Pathogenesis. Front Microbiol 2:129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heithoff DM, Shimp WR, Lau PW, Badie G, Enioutina EY, Daynes RA, Byrne BA, House JK, Mahan MJ, 2008. Human Salmonella clinical isolates distinct from those of animal origin. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1757-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hu Q, Coburn B, Deng W, Li Y, Shi X, Lan Q, Wang B, Coombes BK, Finlay BB, 2008. Salmonella enterica serovar Senftenberg human clinical isolates lacking SPI-1. J Clin Microbiol 46:1330-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hur J, Choi YY, Park JH, Jeon BW, Lee HS, Kim AR, Lee JH, 2011. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence- associated genes, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from piglets with diarrhea in Korea. Can J Ve t R es 75:49-56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. ISO, 2008. UNI EN ISO 6579:2008 Microbiology of Food And Animal Feeding Stuffs - Horizontal Method For The Detection Of Salmonella Spp. [Google Scholar]
  24. ISO, 2015. UNI EN ISO 17604:2015 ISO Microbiology of the food chain -Carcass sampling for microbiological analysis. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jacoby GA, 2009. AmpC beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:161-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kutsukake K, Nakashima H, Tominaga A, Abo T, 2006. Two DNA invertases contribute to flagellar phase variation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2. J Bacteriol 188:950-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lamas A, Fernandez-No IC, Miranda JM, Vázquez B, Cepeda A, Franco CM, 2016. Prevalence, molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars isolated from northwestern Spanish broiler flocks (2011-2015). Poult Sci 95:2097-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lara-Tejero M, Galán JE, 2009. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pathogenicity island 1-encoded type III secretion system translocases mediate intimate attachment to non phagocytic cells. Infect Immun 77:2635-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marimón JM, Gomáriz M, Zigorraga C, Cilla G, Pérez-Trallero E, 2004. Increasing prevalence of quinolone resistance in human nontyphoid Salmonella enterica isolates obtained in Spain from 1981 to 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3789-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mirold S, Ehrbar K, We i s s m u ller A, Prager R, Tschäpe H, Rüssmann H, Hardt WD, 2001. Salmonella host cell invasion emerged by acquisition of a mosaic of separate genetic elements, including Salmonella pathogenicity island 1(SPI1), SPI5, and sopE2. J Bacteriol 183:2348-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore MM, Feist MD, 2007. Real-time PCR method for Salmonella spp. targeting the stn gene. J Appl Microbiol 102:516-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morris GK, Steele CD, Wells JG, 1972. Evaluation of plastic multi-well plates for serological screening of Salmonella cultures with Spicer-Edwards pooled antisera. Appl Microbiol 24:846-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Murugkar HV, Rahman H, Dutta PK, 2003. Distribution of virulence genes in Salmonella serovars isolated from man and animals. Indian J Med Res 117:66-70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Philippon A, Arlet G, Jacoby GA, 2002. Plasmid-determined AmpC-type-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 46:1-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pires SM, de Knegt L, Hald T, 2011. Estimation of the relative contribution of different food and animal sources to human Salmonella infections in the European Union. Søborg, Denmark: National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark. EFSA Supporting Publications 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pires SM, 2013. Assessing the applicability of currently available methods for attributing foodborne disease to sources, including food and food commodities. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10:206-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Prager R, Fruth A, Tschäpe H, 1995. Salmonella enterotoxin (stn) gene is prevalent among strains of Salmonella enterica, but not among Salmonella Bongori and other Enterobacteriaceae. bFEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 12:47-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Raffatellu M, Wilson RP, Chessa D, Andrews-Polymenis H, Tran QT, Lawhon S, Khare S, Adams LG, Bäumler AJ, 2005. SipA, SopA, SopB, SopD, and SopE2 contribute to Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium invasion of epithelial cells. Infect Immun 73:146-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of the Commission of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuff. Official J EU L338:1-26. [Google Scholar]
  40. Regulation (EU) of the Commission No 217/2014 of 7 March 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 as regards Salmonella in pig carcasses. Official Journal of the European Union. 69:93-4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roschansky N, Fischer J, Guerra B, Roesler U, 2014. Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR for the Rapid Detection of the Predominant Beta-Lactamase Genes CTX-M, SHV,TEM and CIT-Type AmpCs in Enterobacteriaceae. PLoS One 9:e100956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Wi ddowson MA, Roy SL, 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Simm R, Ahmad I, Rhen M, Le Guyon S, Römling U, 2014. Regulation of biofilm formation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Future Microbiol 9:1261-82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Spicer CC, 1956. A quick method of identifying Salmonella H antigens. J Clin Pathol 9:378-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stepanovic S, Vukovi D, Daki I, Savi B, Svabi-Vlahovi M, 2000. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods 40:175-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Damme I, Mattheus W, Bertrand S, De Zutter L, 2018. Quantification of hygiene indicators and Salmonella in the tonsils, oral cavity and rectal content samples of pigs during slaughter. Food Microbiol 71:120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang YP, Li L, Shen JZ, Yang FJ, Wu YN, 2009. Quinolone-resistance in Salmonella is associated with decreased mRNA expression of virulence genes invA and avrA, growth and intracellular invasion and survival. Vet Microbiol 133:328-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu SY, Wang LD, Xu GM1, Yang SD, Deng QF, Li YY1, Huang R., 2017. Spv locus aggravates Salmonella infection of zebrafish adult by inducing Th1/Th2 shift to Th2 polarization. Fish Shellfish Immunol 67:684-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yoon H, McDermott JE, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Heffron F, 2009. Coordinated regulation of virulence during systemic infection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang S, Santos RL, Ts ol is RM, Stender S, Hardt WD, Baumler AJ, Adams LG, 2002. The Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium effector proteins sipA, sopA, sopB, sopD, and sopE2 act in concert to induce diarrhea in calves. Infect Immun 70:3843-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang S, Kingsley RA, Santos R, 2003. Molecular pathogenesis of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimuriuminduced diarrhea. Infect Immun 71:1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Italian Journal of Food Safety are provided here courtesy of PAGEPress

RESOURCES