Skip to main content
Obstetric Medicine logoLink to Obstetric Medicine
. 2018 Mar 7;11(2):67–72. doi: 10.1177/1753495X17744478

Hypomagnesaemia and pregnancy

Adam Morton 1,
PMCID: PMC6038016  PMID: 29997688

Abstract

Hypomagnesaemia is common in pregnancy, particularly in developing countries and low-income communities. Despite the frequent therapeutic use of magnesium in pregnancy, and the evidence regarding the association of hypomagnesaemia with adverse pregnancy outcomes in animal studies, it remains unclear whether hypomagnesaemia is associated with complications in human pregnancy. Three case reports of pregnancies complicated by moderate–severe hypomagnesaemia are presented and magnesium physiology in pregnancy is discussed. The evidence as to whether hypomagnesaemia may represent a direct cause, a consequence of other disease processes or an epiphenomenon in adverse pregnancies outcomes is reviewed.

Keywords: Hypomagnesaemia, physiology, adverse pregnancy outcomes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, premature labour, small for gestational age, Gitelman syndrome, jejunoileal bypass

Introduction

Magnesium (Mg), the fourth most abundant cation in the body, has been described as the ‘forgotten’ electrolyte in medicine. Mg infusions were previously used in pregnancy for tocolysis, and continue to be used for fetal neuroprotection in the setting of prematurity and prevention of eclampsia, as well as oral supplementation for prevention of leg cramps. Maternal hypomagnesaemia (hypoMg) has been reported in 16% of pregnant women in Nigeria and 40–60% of pregnant women in South Asia.1,2 Murine studies have shown maternal hypoMg is associated with impaired placental development, impaired fetal growth and increased mortality.3,4 The evidence that hypoMg is a cause of adverse pregnancy outcome or that supplementation is beneficial in humans remains unclear. Three cases of pregnancies complicated by hypoMg are described. Mg physiology in pregnancy is reviewed, and the possible relationship between hypoMg and adverse pregnancy outcomes discussed.

Case 1

A 31-year-old gravida 2 para 1 was referred for antenatal care at 12 weeks’ gestation. Diabetes mellitus had been diagnosed at age 20 with hypoMg, mild renal dysfunction and renal cysts, confirmed on genetic testing to be due to hepatonuclear factor 1 beta heterozygosity (HNF1-β). Her first pregnancy had resulted in the birth of a 3400 g live male infant at 37 weeks’ gestation. The patient’s medications included metformin, insulin, folic acid, aspirin and calcium. Sulphonylurea therapy had previously been ineffective. The patient’s body mass index preconception was 29.7 kg/m2. Investigations revealed HbA1c of 5.3% and serum creatinine was 84 µmol/l with eGFR 80 ml/min/1.73 m2. During the pregnancy, serum Mg (se Mg) ranged between 0.4 and 0.5 mmol/l (non-pregnant reference interval 0.7–1.0). Serum potassium (se K) was normal. No Mg supplementation was given. The current pregnancy was complicated by fetal macrosomia, a healthy 4413 g infant male born at 37 weeks’ gestation who was euglycaemic in the neonatal period.

Case 2

A 38-year-old gravida 5 para 2 was noted to have a se Mg of 0.2 mmol/l on blood tests performed for investigation of arthralgias at 32 weeks’ gestation. Se K+ was 3.9 mmol/l (normal third trimester 3.2–4.6), serum calcium was 2.39 mmol/l (normal 2.0–2.4) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D was 112 nmol/l (normal 50–150). The patient was asymptomatic. The woman’s first successful pregnancy had been complicated by preeclampsia at 35 weeks’ gestation and her second pregnancy was uncomplicated. Se Mg had not been tested previously. The woman’s past history was significant for osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy including cisplatin at age 19 years. In this pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had been diagnosed at 28 weeks and she was treated with metformin and insulin with satisfactory glycaemic control. During the pregnancy se Mg ranged between 0.2 and 0.4 mmol/l. Twenty-four-hour urine Mg was inappropriately elevated at 4.1 mmol/day (normal 3–5) and 24 h urine calcium was 1.0 mmol/day (non-pregnant reference range 1.2–7.5). At 32 weeks’ gestation serum aldosterone was 5830 pmol/l (normal third trimester 415–2800) and plasma renin activity was 138 mU/l (normal 66–660). Urinary amino acids were of normal pattern. Gene testing for HNF1-β was negative. Genetic testing for Gitelman syndrome (GS) is pending. Her electrocardiogram showed normal PR and QRS duration, and the QTc interval was 456 ms. The pregnancy was otherwise uncomplicated, the mother delivering a healthy 3436 g female infant by planned caesarean section at 38 weeks’ gestation. No neonatal electrolytes were performed. The previous cisplatin therapy is the most likely cause of the hypoMg in this case. Cisplatin therapy may cause long-term renal Mg wasting as well as hypocalciuria.5 The main differential diagnosis in this case is GS, which may also cause hypoMg secondary to hypermagnesuria, hypocalciuria and hyperreninaemic hyperaldosteronism.

Case 3

A 35-year-old El Salvadorian woman, gravida 5 para 0, was noted to have a se Mg of 0.3 mmol/l and se K of 3.1 mmol/l on routine blood tests at 16 weeks’ gestation. The patient was asymptomatic. GDM was diagnosed at 11 weeks’ gestation, and her past history was significant for hypothyroidism, vitiligo and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. She denied using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), diuretics or herbal treatments, and denied pica or excess caffeine intake. Her se K had been 3.0 mmol/l six years earlier. Her family history was unknown. Twenty-four-hour urine electrolyte excretion was Mg 5.4 mmol/day, calcium 6.6 mmol/day and K 75 mmol/day (normal second trimester 10–40). Urine amino acid pattern was normal. Serum aldosterone was 2610 pmol/l and plasma renin activity 188 mU/l. Antitransglutaminase antibody performed in view of hypothyroidism and vitiligo was negative. As renal ultrasound and function were normal, testing for HNF1-β mutation was not performed. Mg aspartate 1 g three times a day was prescribed; however, se Mg remained unchanged. GDM was managed with basal-bolus insulin. A healthy 4179 g boy was delivered at 37 weeks by elective caesarean section. The mother was lost to follow-up post-partum.

The woman did not have ocular or renal manifestations suggestive of familial hypoMg with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. Although testing for seven genes associated with Bartter syndrome was negative, this condition is associated with a multitude of gene mutations, some of which are not tested for routinely, and there may be many unrecognised mutations.6,7 Bartter syndrome was thought to be the most likely cause of hypoMg in this case.

In summary three cases of different aetiologies of significant hypoMg in pregnancy are presented. Despite the severity of hypoMg no maternal or fetal complications other than GDM were noted.

Mg physiology

Distribution of Mg

The normal adult human body contains approximately 1000 mmol of Mg.8,9 The predominant sites of distribution of Mg are in bone (53%), muscle (27%), soft tissue (19%) and red blood cells (RBCs) (0.5%), with only 0.3% of total body Mg in serum.10 Thirty per cent of the stores of Mg in bone is exchangeable and functions to stabilise the serum concentration. Of se Mg, 20% is protein bound, 65% is ionised and the remainder is complexed with anions including phosphate and citrate. Acid–base disturbances have minimal effect on the distribution of Mg. Intracellular Mg concentrations range from 5 to 20 mmol/l of which 1–5% is ionised.

Mg absorption

Mg absorption occurs primarily in the ileum and colon. Fractional intestinal absorption is dependent mainly on Mg status and tends to be inversely related to intake with 65% absorption at low and 11% at high intake.9Mg intake depends on the Mg concentration in drinking water and foods. Green leafy vegetables, grain, cereal, nuts and legumes are rich in Mg. Intermittent concentrations of Mg are found in fruit, meat and fish, and low Mg concentrations are present in dairy products. Refining and cooking of foods result in significant loss of Mg.11 A review of six studies performed in the United States found that Mg intake during pregnancy ranged from 30 to 50% of the recommended daily intake of 355 mg/day.12 Intake was particularly inadequate in low-income women.

Intracellular Mg homeostasis is regulated by transport mechanisms and homeostatic factors, which are encoded by Mg-sensitive genes. TRMP6 and TRMP 7 are Mg-sensitive genes localised in the colon and renal distal convoluted tubules. It is thought they play an important role in regulating whole-body Mg homeostasis. Increased expression of TRMP6 at 12 weeks’ gestation has been demonstrated compared with non-pregnant controls indicating an increased demand for Mg in pregnancy.13

Mg excretion

Ninety-five per cent of Mg filtered by the kidneys is reabsorbed, predominantly in the thick ascending loop of Henle.9,14 Reduced absorption, and thus increased Mg excretion, occurs with increased plasma Mg concentration, increased glomerular filtration rate, hypophosphataemia and hypercalcaemia. Several hormones including parathyroid hormone, calcitonin, insulin, glucagon and antidiuretic hormone also affect urinary excretion of Mg. Normal Mg excretion in the non-pregnant adult is 3–5 mmol/day. Urinary excretion of Mg rises by approximately 25% during pregnancy.15 In the presence of hypoMg, Mg excretion of greater than 1 mmol/day is consistent with renal Mg wasting. Mg excretion of less than 0.5 mmol/day is suggestive of Mg deficiency.11

Assessment of Mg status

Measurement of se total Mg levels may be affected by delay in separating serum, high phosphate levels, lipaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and haemolysis. Se Mg does not correlate with tissue pools nor reflect total body or intracellular Mg content.9 Measurement of ionised Mg is possible although susceptible to false results without very well-defined sample handling, and probably has little value in addition to se total Mg levels.1621 RBC Mg does not correlate well with total body Mg or other measures of Mg status.22 Lymphocyte Mg may be a better reflection of skeletal and muscle Mg stores; however, the measurement is technically difficult and has high intra-individual variation.23Mg loading/tolerance tests are a sensitive measure to detect Mg deficiency in individuals with normal renal function.24,25 Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is useful as a research tool to measure intracellular Mg without requiring skeletal muscle or bone biopsy.

Mg levels in pregnancy

Se Mg declines from a preconception mean of 0.93 mmol/l to a nadir mean of 0.63 mmol/l in the third trimester.15,2630 Trimester-specific reference intervals for Mg in pregnancy depend on the assay used and the population studied.

Published reference intervals are as follows31:

Preconception First trimester Second trimester Third trimester
Se Mg (mmol/l) 0.62–0.95 0.65–0.9 0.62–0.9 0.45–0.9

Similarly ionised and RBC Mg, and intracellular free Mg in brain and muscle are lower in pregnancy than in non-pregnant controls when measured by NMR spectroscopy.32,33

Transplacental passage of Mg

After the fifth month of gestation, increasing amounts of Mg are transported from mother to fetus, averaging approximately 4.5 mg/day.34 Fetal Mg levels are higher than maternal Mg levels consistent with a transplacental gradient. Little is known about the mechanism and regulation of placental Mg flux.35 It has been postulated that maternal–fetal Mg gradient is due to an active transport mechanism, as the gradient is not due to differences in protein binding between mother and fetus.36 The gradient, however, is insufficient to protect the fetus from Mg deficiency in the setting of chronic maternal Mg deprivation.

Hypomagnesaemia and pregnancy complications

HypoMg has been implicated as a potential contributing factor in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, GDM, preterm labour and intrauterine growth restriction.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Meta-analyses have shown an inverse relationship between dietary Mg intake and the risk of hypertension, stroke, heart failure and diabetes mellitus in the general population.3739 A meta-analysis of 14 studies revealed women with pregnancy-induced hypertension had lower levels of se Mg, zinc and calcium than healthy pregnant women.40 There is an overexpression for the gene SLC41A1, a Na/Mg exchanger, in placenta from women with preeclampsia (PET) compared with normal placentas, suggesting a change in Mg homeostasis may contribute to the development of PET.41 Twenty-four-hour urine excretion of Mg and calcium is significantly lower in second and third trimester in women with mild pregnancy-induced hypertension than in normotensive controls.42

Major methodological difficulties in the interpretation of intervention studies into the role of Mg supplementation in prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include variations in dietary intake of Mg, doses of Mg used and the bioavailability of individual Mg preparations used (e.g. Mg citrate has better bioavailability than Mg oxide or Mg chloride).4345 High doses of supplemental Mg may result in diarrhoea. A review of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s trial register found that Mg supplementation during pregnancy was not associated with a reduction in perinatal mortality, small for gestational age (SGA) or preeclampsia compared with a control group.46 Mothers taking Mg were less likely to require hospitalisation during pregnancy. Mg supplementation was associated with significantly fewer babies with Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min, meconium-stained liquor, late fetal heart decelerations and mild hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy. A multicentre randomised double-blind clinical trial, the Brazilian Magnesium trial, is examining the effect of Mg citrate 150 mg twice a day versus placebo commenced at 12–20 weeks’ gestation on adverse pregnancy outcomes in women at higher risk of placental dysfunction.47

A recent randomised controlled trial of low-risk pregnant women in Iran with se Mg less than 0.78 mmol/l at 12–14 weeks’ gestation found that supplementation with an effervescent 200 mg Mg preparation for one month together with a multimineral preparation containing 100 mg Mg until the end of pregnancy was associated with lower risks of PET, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth, low birth weight and GDM.48

Mouse models of moderate dietary maternal hypoMg did not find programming for neonatal nephron deficit or later cardiovascular function at six months of age, suggesting no long-term adverse outcomes for the cardiovascular health on offspring of hypoMg mothers.49

GDM

The analysis of a possible relationship between se Mg and the development of GDM has yielded inconsistent results in observational studies.50 Studies comparing serum ionised and total Mg between GDM and controls have revealed lower, similar and elevated levels.5154 Infants of mothers with GDM have lower whole blood Mg levels at 24 h of life than matched controls and are at increased risk of neonatal hypocalcaemia.55

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 70 women with Mg deficiency and GDM randomised to 250 mg Mg oxide or placebo per day found that those receiving Mg therapy had a significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin concentration and improvement in insulin sensitivity, and a lower incidence of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia and newborn hospitalisation.56 No difference was seen in the requirement for insulin therapy, polyhydramnios, preterm delivery, newborn birth size or neonatal hypoglycaemia. In one study of post-partum women following pregnancies complicated by GDM, lower se Mg was associated with increased risk of developing T2DM.57

Preterm labour

Several studies have demonstrated lower se and RBC Mg levels in women with preterm delivery or preterm labour.5862

SGA

Lower cord blood intracellular platelet Mg levels in SGA neonates suggest that intrauterine Mg deficiency may result in SGA and potentially programme insulin resistance after birth, leading to increased risk of metabolic syndrome in later life.63 The pooled estimation from three trials found that Mg supplementation was associated with a 30% reduction in the rate of SGA infants.64 Similarly pooled results from four trials found a 33% reduction in low birth weight with Mg supplementation, and that overall newborns in Mg supplementation group weighed 51 g more than the newborns of non-supplemented mothers.

Medical conditions that cause hypoMg and pregnancy outcomes

The major causes of hypoMg relevant to pregnancy are summarised in Table 1. Diabetes mellitus is likely to be the most common cause of hypoMg in pregnancy. A Medline review using the terms ‘hypomagnesaemia’, ‘magnesium’ and ‘pregnancy’ indicated that GS was the most common condition associated with hypoMg in case studies. Older literature reported hypoMg occurring with thiazide diuretic therapy during pregnancy as well as in pregnancies following jejunoileal bypass surgery for obesity. PPIs, increasingly being prescribed for gastro-oesophageal reflux in pregnancy, may be associated with hypoMg; however, this usually occurs with long-term use and to date no cases have been described in pregnancy.

Table 1.

Causes of hypomagnesaemia relevant to pregnancy.

Gastrointestinal
• Decreased intake – malnutrition, alcohol excess
• Malabsorption – steatorrhoea, small bowel bypass surgery, proton pump inhibitors, ketogenic diets
• Secretory loss – chronic diarrhoea
Renal
• Congenital tubular defects – Gitelman syndrome, Bartter syndrome, familial hypomagnesaemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis, autosomal dominant hypomagnesaemia, HNF1-β mutations
• Drug induced – loop/thiazide diuretics, calcineurin inhibitors, previous cisplatin therapy, alcohol
• Reduced NaCl reabsorption – hyperaldosteronism, hypercalcaemia
• Osmotic polyuria – poorly controlled diabetes mellitus
• Leptospirosis
Miscellaneous
• Post-parathyroidectomy
• Excessive lactation

1. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)

Renal clearance of Mg increases during hyperglycaemia in individuals with T1DM independently of insulin levels from the time of diagnosis.65,66 Hypermagnesiuria and hypoMg tend to be greater in female than male individuals with the same glycaemic control. Severity of hypoMg is greater in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria or overt nephropathy than in normoalbuminuric individuals.67,68 A relationship between maternal se Mg at approximately nine weeks’ gestation and adverse pregnancy outcome (spontaneous miscarriage, congenital malformation) was examined in 96 pregnancies to 84 women with T1DM.69 Maternal blood glycohaemoglobin was significantly higher, and se Mg lower in the group of women with adverse pregnancy outcomes. There was no significant correlation between se Mg and glycohaemoglobin. Amniotic fluid Mg levels were lower in pregnant women with T1DM compared with gestation-matched controls.70,71

Neonatal hypoMg was demonstrated in 40% of offspring of mothers with T1DM.72 These infants did not display the normal increase in se Mg in the first week of life seen in normomagnesaemic infants. Neonatal hypoMg was related to severity of maternal diabetes mellitus, prematurity and lower maternal gravidity. It is postulated that lower fetal Mg levels may result in impaired release and resistance to the action of parathyroid hormone resulting in neonatal hypocalcaemia. Less strict glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM was associated with a higher rate of neonatal hypocalcaemia and lower neonatal se Mg than in women with strict control.73 Similarly se Mg was lower in venous cord blood in 44 pregnancies to women with diabetes mellitus (27 T1DM, 17 insulin-treated GDM) compared with non-pregnant controls and non-pregnant women with T1DM. Urine excretion of Mg and calcium is lower in children of mothers with T1 DM, possibly related to intrauterine programming of renal bivalent cation handling.74

2. GS

GS is an autosomal recessive salt-losing tubulopathy due to a mutation of genes encoding the sodium chloride co-transporters and Mg channels in the thiazide-sensitive segments of the distal convoluted tubule. The prevalence of GS has been estimated to be 1:40,000 women with heterozygote frequency of 1% in Caucasians.75 Characteristic biochemical features include hypoMg, hypokalaemia, hyperreninaemic hyperaldosteronism, kaliuresis and hypocalciuria. Thirty pregnancies to 22 mothers with GS have been reported.7679 Pregnancy complications included two cases of stillbirth in women with presumed GS.77,80 The diagnosis of GS in these two cases was not definite – both women presented with symptomatic hypokalaemia following gastroenteritis, the se Mg was normal in both cases, and genetic testing was not performed. Two cases of intrauterine growth restriction, and one case of preeclampsia with haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets have been reported in mothers with GS.79 In addition, oligohydramnios was noted in six pregnancies that were otherwise uncomplicated.81 Despite the treating team being unable to normalise se Mg and potassium levels in the majority of cases, pregnancy outcomes were normal leading authors to question the necessity of correcting serum electrolytes in GS pregnancies.8284

3. Thiazide diuretic therapy

Thiazide diuretics were extensively used in the treatment of oedema and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy prior to the mid-1980s. Treatment with thiazides in non-pregnant adults was associated with hypoMg in 19.4% of 242 subjects after 1–3 weeks of treatment.85 Thiazide diuretic use during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with marked hypokalaemia and moderate hyponatraemia; however, se Mg was not measured.86 A Cochrane review found no difference between thiazide diuretic use in pregnancy and placebo with regard to the development of PET, perinatal death, preterm birth, gestation at delivery or caesarean section rate.87

4. Jejunoileal bypass

HypoMg occurs in up to 58% of patients following jejunoileal bypass.88 Pregnancy following jejunoileal bypass may be associated with severe hypoMg, hypocalcaemia and hypokalaemic paralysis.89 A review of 179 pregnancies in mothers who had previously undergone jejunoileal bypass for obesity found no increased rate of congenital malformations or perinatal mortality, though lower birth weight, shorter gestational age and a higher proportion of small-for-dates infants than expected occurred.90 It is possible these mothers may have had other nutritional deficiencies that led to fetal growth restriction.

5. PPIs

HypoMg may uncommonly occur with long-term use of PPI as a result of reduced passive and active intestinal Mg absorption. While onset of hypoMg has been reported as early as 14 days after commencement of PPI, the median time of onset is after 5.5 years of PPI use, and the risk is highest in the elderly especially with concomitant diuretic use.91,92 Short-term PPI use causes at most a 5% reduction in se Mg and a 1% reduction in intestinal absorption after one week of PPI therapy.92 No cases of PPI-induced hypoMg in pregnancy have been reported. Studies including more than 10,000 pregnancies with maternal exposure to PPIs did not demonstrate an increased risk of congenital malformation, premature delivery, perinatal mortality, low birth weight or low Apgar scores.9396

6. Calcineurin inhibitors

HypoMg is seen in approximately 5% of long-term renal transplant recipients, with no significant difference in those receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus.97 No reports of clinically significant hypoMg complicating immunosuppression have been reported in pregnancy.

Conclusion

It remains unclear whether hypoMg is a direct cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, a consequence of underlying disorders such as poorly controlled diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome which may lead to pregnancy complications, or an epiphenomenon in these disease processes. The pregnancy outcome in the three cases presented despite moderate–severe hypoMg, and the predominantly satisfactory pregnancy outcome in women with GS or following jejunoileal bypass argues against hypoMg as a direct cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The need for Mg supplementation in hypoMg pregnant women who are asymptomatic remains unanswered. Further studies examining the pregnancy and neonatal effects of Mg supplementation in women at high risk of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and in women with existing diabetes mellitus would be valuable to inform this issue.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Guarantor

APM

Contributorship

APM wrote the article.

References

  • 1.Pathak P, Kapil U. Role of trace elements zinc, copper and magnesium during pregnancy and its outcome. Indian J Pediatr 2004; 71: 1003–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Enaruna NO, Ande A, Okpere EE. Clinical significance of low serum magnesium in pregnant women attending the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Niger J Clin Pract 2013; 16: 448–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schlegel RN, Cuffe JS, Moritz KM, et al. Maternal hypomagnesemia causes placental abnormalities and fetal and postnatal mortality. Placenta 2015; 36: 750–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Almonte RA, Heath DL, Whitehall J, et al. Gestational magnesium deficiency is deleterious to fetal outcome. Biol Neonate 1999; 76: 26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bianchetti MG, Kanaka C, Ridolfi-Luthy A, et al. Chronic renal magnesium loss, hypocalciuria and mild hypokalaemic metabolic alkalosis after cisplatin. Pediatr Nephrol 1990; 4: 219–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Subasinghe CJ, Sirisena ND, Herath C, et al. Novel mutation in the SLC12A3 gene in a Sri Lankan family with Gitelman syndrome & coexistent diabetes: a case report. BMC Nephrol 2017; 18: 140–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun M, Ning J, Xu W, et al. Genetic heterogeneity in patients with Bartter syndrome type 1. Mol Med Rep 2017; 15: 581–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, et al. Magnesium. An update on physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 294: 1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jahnen-Dechent W, Ketteler M. Magnesium basics. Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: i3–i14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swaminathan R. Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev 2003; 24: 47–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fawcett WJ, Haxby EJ, Male DA. Magnesium: physiology and pharmacology. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 302–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Franz KB. Magnesium intake during pregnancy. Magnesium 1987; 6: 18–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nestler A, Rylander R, Kolisek M, et al. Blood pressure in pregnancy and magnesium sensitive genes. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014; 4: 41–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nair AV, Hocher B, Verkaart S, et al. Loss of insulin-induced activation of TRPM6 magnesium channels results in impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 11324–11329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spatling L, Disch G, Classen HG. Magnesium in pregnant women and the newborn. Magnesium Res 1989; 2: 271–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sanders GT, Huijgen HJ, Sanders R. Magnesium in disease: a review with special emphasis on the serum ionized magnesium. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37: 1011–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ritter C, Ghahramani M, Marsoner HJ. More on the measurement of ionized magnesium in whole blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1996; 224: 275–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lanzinger MJ, Moretti EW, Wilderman RF, et al. The relationship between ionized and total serum magnesium concentrations during abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 245–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johansson M, Whiss PA. Weak relationship between ionized and total magnesium in serum of patients requiring magnesium status. Biol Trace Elem Res 2007; 115: 13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Durlach J, Pages N, Bac P, et al. Chronopathological forms of magnesium depletion with hypofunction or with hyperfunction of the biological clock. Magnesium Res 2002; 15: 263–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koch SM, Warters RD, Mehlhorn U. The simultaneous measurement of ionized and total calcium and ionized and total magnesium in intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care 2002; 17: 203–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elin RJ. Magnesium: the fifth but forgotten electrolyte. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102: 616–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin BJ, Lyon TD, Walker W, et al. Mononuclear blood cell magnesium in older subjects: evaluation of its use in clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem 1993; 30: 23–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rude RK. Magnesium metabolism and deficiency. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993; 22: 377–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nadler JL, Rude RK. Disorders of magnesium metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1995; 24: 623–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sheldon WL, Aspillaga MO, Smith PA, et al. The effects of oral iron supplementation on zinc and magnesium levels during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 892–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kisters K. [Disorders of magnesium balance]. Internist 1998; 39: 815–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cruikshank DP, Pitkin RM, Reynolds WA, et al. Effects of magnesium sulfate treatment on perinatal calcium metabolism. I. Maternal and fetal responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dawson EB, Clark RR, McGanity WJ. Plasma vitamins and trace metal changes during teen-age pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 953–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lim MK. Experience with serum magnesium estimations. Med J Aust 1969; 1: 1075–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1326–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Resnick LM, Barbagallo M, Bardicef M, et al. Cellular-free magnesium depletion in brain and muscle of normal and preeclamptic pregnancy: a nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic study. Hypertension 2004; 44: 322–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lim P, Jacob E, Dong S, et al. Values for tissue magnesium as a guide in detecting magnesium deficiency. J Clin Pathol 1969; 22: 417–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tsang RC. Neonatal magnesium disturbances. Am J Dis Child 1972; 124: 282–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohata Y, Ozono K, Michigami T. Current concepts in perinatal mineral metabolism. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2016; 25: 9–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Husain SM, Mughal MZ. Mineral transport across the placenta. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 874–878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fang X, Liang C, Li M, et al. Dose-response relationship between dietary magnesium intake and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and dose-based meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2016; 38: 64–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Han H, Fang X, Wei X, et al. Dose-response relationship between dietary magnesium intake, serum magnesium concentration and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr J 2017; 16: 26–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fang C, Wang X, Wu W, et al. Association of serum magnesium level with odds of prediabetes and diabetes in a southern Chinese population: a prospective nested case-control study. Biol Trace Elem Res 2016; 172: 307–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.He L, Lang L, Li Y, et al. Comparison of serum zinc, calcium, and magnesium concentrations in women with pregnancy-induced hypertension and healthy pregnant women: a meta-analysis. Hypertens Pregnancy 2016; 35: 202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kolisek M, Galaviz-Hernandez C, Vazquez-Alaniz F, et al. SLC41A1 is the only magnesium responsive gene significantly overexpressed in placentas of preeclamptic women. Hypertens Pregnancy 2013; 32: 378–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Singh HJ. Serum and urinary divalent cations and plasma renin activity in women with mild pregnancy-induced hypertension. Med J Malaysia 1995; 50: 93–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lindberg JS, Zobitz MM, Poindexter JR, et al. Magnesium bioavailability from magnesium citrate and magnesium oxide. J Am Coll Nutr 1990; 9: 48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rylander R. Magnesium in drinking water – a case for prevention? J Water Health 2014; 12: 34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Firoz M, Graber M. Bioavailability of US commercial magnesium preparations. Magnesium Res 2001; 14: 257–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Makrides M, Crosby DD, Bain E, et al. Magnesium supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: CD000937–CD000937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alves JG, de Araujo CA, Pontes IE, et al. The BRAzil MAGnesium (BRAMAG) trial: a randomized clinical trial of oral magnesium supplementation in pregnancy for the prevention of preterm birth and perinatal and maternal morbidity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 222–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zarean E, Tarjan A. Effect of magnesium supplement on pregnancy outcomes: a randomized control trial. Adv Biomed Res 2017; 6: 109–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schlegel RN, Moritz KM, Paravicini TM. Maternal hypomagnesemia alters renal function but does not program changes in the cardiovascular physiology of adult offspring. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2016; 7: 473–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dalton LM, Ni Fhloinn DM, Gaydadzhieva GT, et al. Magnesium in pregnancy. Nutr Rev 2016; 74: 549–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Goker Tasdemir U, Tasdemir N, Kilic S, et al. Alterations of ionized and total magnesium levels in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 79: 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ertbeg P, Norgaard P, Bang L, et al. Ionized magnesium in gestational diabetes. Magnesium Res 2004; 17: 35–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nabouli MR, Lassoued L, Bakri Z, et al. Modification of total magnesium level in pregnant Saudi Women developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2016; 10: 183–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bardicef M, Bardicef O, Sorokin Y, et al. Extracellular and intracellular magnesium depletion in pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1009–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Banerjee S, Mimouni FB, Mehta R, et al. Lower whole blood ionized magnesium concentrations in hypocalcemic infants of gestational diabetic mothers. Magnesium Res 2003; 16: 127–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Asemi Z, Karamali M, Jamilian M, et al. Magnesium supplementation affects metabolic status and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102: 222–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yang SJ, Hwang SY, Baik SH, et al. Serum magnesium level is associated with type 2 diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: the Korea National Diabetes Program Study. J Korean Med Sci 2014; 29: 84–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kurzel RB. Serum magnesium levels in pregnancy and preterm labor. Am J Perinatol 1991; 8: 119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mitrovic-Jovanovic A, Dragojevic-Dikic S, Zamurovic M, et al. Comparison of electrolytic status (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) in preterm and term deliveries. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 479–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sharma A, Kharb S, Vineeta, et al. Serum magnesium levels in preterm labour in relation to socioeconomic status. Indian J Clin Biochem 1998; 13: 123–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kamal S, Sharan A, Kumar U, et al. Serum magnesium level in preterm labour. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2003; 46: 271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Uludag EU, Gozukara IO, Kucur SK, et al. Maternal magnesium level effect on preterm labor treatment. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 1449–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Takaya J, Kaneko K. Small for gestational age and magnesium in cord blood platelets: intrauterine magnesium deficiency may induce metabolic syndrome in later life. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 270474–270474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Merialdi M, Carroli G, Villar J, et al. Nutritional interventions during pregnancy for the prevention or treatment of impaired fetal growth: an overview of randomized controlled trials. J Nutr 2003; 133: 1626S–1631S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Djurhuus MS, Skott P, Vaag A, et al. Hyperglycaemia enhances renal magnesium excretion in type 1 diabetic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000; 60: 403–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Roffi M, Kanaka C, Mullis PE, et al. Hypermagnesiuria in children with newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Nephrol 1994; 14: 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Corsonello A, Ientile R, Buemi M, et al. Serum ionized magnesium levels in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria or clinical proteinuria. Am J Nephrol 2000; 20: 187–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Allegra A, Corsonello A, Buemi M, et al. Plasma, erythrocyte and platelet magnesium levels in type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and clinical proteinuria. J Trace Elem Med Biol 1997; 11: 154–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mimouni F, Miodovnik M, Tsang RC, et al. Decreased maternal serum magnesium concentration and adverse fetal outcome in insulin-dependent diabetic women. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 85–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mimouni F, Miodovnik M, Tsang RC, et al. Decreased amniotic fluid magnesium concentration in diabetic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 12–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Doraczynska E, Rechberger T, Wawrzycka B, et al. [Concentration of magnesium in the amniotic fluid of a patient with diabetes]. Ginekol Pol 1995; 66: 653–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tsang RC, Strub R, Brown DR, et al. Hypomagnesemia in infants of diabetic mothers: perinatal studies. J Pediatr 1976; 89: 115–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Demarini S, Mimouni F, Tsang RC, et al. Impact of metabolic control of diabetes during pregnancy on neonatal hypocalcemia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 918–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mughal MZ, Eelloo JA, Roberts SA, et al. Intrauterine programming of urinary calcium and magnesium excretion in children born to mothers with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F332–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Knoers NV, Levtchenko EN. Gitelman syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008; 3: 22–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Morton A, Panitz B, Bush A. Eplerenone for Gitelman syndrome in pregnancy. Nephrology 2011; 16: 349–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nand N, Deshmukh AR, Mathur R, et al. Gitelman syndrome: presenting during pregnancy with adverse foetal outcome. J Assoc Physicians India 2016; 64: 104–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Moustakakis MN, Bockorny M. Gitelman syndrome and pregnancy. Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 552–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lee M, Kim DI, Lee KH, et al. HELLP syndrome in a pregnant patient with Gitelman syndrome. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2017; 36: 95–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lakhi N, Jones J, Govind A. Fetal demise despite normalisation of serum potassium in Gitelman syndrome. Case report and literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 301–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mathen S, Venning M, Gillham J. Outpatient management of Gitelman’s syndrome in pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep 2013, pp. 2013–2013. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Basu A, Dillon RD, Taylor R, et al. Is normalisation of serum potassium and magnesium always necessary in Gitelman Syndrome for a successful obstetric outcome? BJOG 2004; 111: 630–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Daskalakis G, Marinopoulos S, Mousiolis A, et al. Gitelman syndrome-associated severe hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia: case report and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1301–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rusavy Z, Hudec A, Karbanova J, et al. [Gitelman syndrome in pregnancy–a severe hypokalemia with favorable perinatal prognosis]. Ceska Gynekol 2012; 77: 421–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pak CY. Correction of thiazide-induced hypomagnesemia by potassium-magnesium citrate from review of prior trials. Clin Nephrol 2000; 54: 271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gjonnaess H. Thiazide treatment in pregnancy with special reference to maternal and foetal electrolytes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1968; 47: 404–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Churchill D, Beevers GD, Meher S, et al. Diuretics for preventing pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 24: CD004451–CD004451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jorgensen S, Olesen M, Gudman-Hoyer E. A review of 20 years of jejunoileal bypass. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 334–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Houston BD, Turner T. Severe electrolyte abnormalities in a pregnant patient with a jejunoileal bypass. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 1712–1713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Knudsen LB, Kallen B. Intestinal bypass operation and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 831–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hess MW, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, et al. Systematic review: hypomagnesaemia induced by proton pump inhibition. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 405–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Toh JW, Ong E, Wilson R. Hypomagnesaemia associated with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. Gastroenterol Rep 2015; 3: 243–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Matok I, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, et al. The safety of fetal exposure to proton-pump inhibitors during pregnancy. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 699–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Erichsen R, Mikkelsen E, Pedersen L, et al. Maternal use of proton pump inhibitors during early pregnancy and the prevalence of hypospadias in male offspring. Am J Ther 2014; 21: 254–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gill SK, O’Brien L, Einarson TR, et al. The safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1541–1545. quiz 1540, 1546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of proton-pump inhibitors in early pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2114–2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rodrigues N, Santana A, Guerra J, et al. Serum magnesium and related factors in long-term renal transplant recipients: an observational study. Transplant Proc 2017; 49: 799–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Obstetric Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES