Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications
. 2018 Jun 26;74(Pt 7):385–390. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X18007689

Structural polymorphism of the Escherichia coli poly-α-l-glutamate synthetase RimK

Yasuhiro Arimura a,b, Tomonori Kono c, Kuniki Kino c,*, Hitoshi Kurumizaka a,b,d,*
PMCID: PMC6038451  PMID: 29969101

Two different conformations, closed and open forms, of the E. coli poly-α-l-glutamate synthetase protein RimK were determined in complex with the ATP analogue AMP-PNP by X-ray crystallography at 2.05 Å resolution. The structure of the open form of RimK is unique and differs substantially from the structures of its homologues.

Keywords: RimK, poly-α-l-glutamate synthetase, structural polymorphism, Escherichia coli

Abstract

Bacterial RimK is an enzyme that catalyzes the polyglutamylation of the C-terminus of ribosomal protein S6 and the synthesis of poly-α-l-glutamate peptides using l-glutamic acid. In the present study, the crystal structure of the Escherichia coli RimK protein complexed with the ATP analogue AMP-PNP was determined at 2.05 Å resolution. Two different conformations of RimK, closed and open forms, were observed in the crystals. The structural polymorphism revealed in this study provided important information to understand the mechanism by which RimK catalyzes the synthesis of poly-α-l-glutamate peptides and the polyglutamylation of ribosomal protein S6.

1. Introduction  

Ribosomal protein S6 modification protein (RimK: EC 6.3.2.43) is highly conserved from bacteria to mammals and catalyzes the post-translational polyglutamylation of ribosomal protein S6 (RpsF) in bacteria (Kang et al., 1989). Escherichia coli RimK also catalyzes the synthesis of poly-α-l-glutamic acid, using l-glutamic acid as a substrate, in an ATP-dependent manner (Kino et al., 2011). Two genes encoding the RimK homologues RIMKLA and RIMKLB have been identified in mammalian genomes (Collard et al., 2010). RIMKLA and RIMKLB catalyze the synthesis of the neurodipeptides N-acetylaspartylglutamate and β-citrylglutamate, respectively (Collard et al., 2010).

RimK belongs to the ATP-dependent carboxylate-amine/thiol ligase superfamily (Galperin & Koonin, 1997). This superfamily also includes a lysine-biosynthesis enzyme (LysX) and an arginine-biosynthesis enzyme (ArgX). LysX and ArgX catalyze the post-translational modification of LysW by adding a single α-aminoadipic acid and a single glutamic acid to the C-terminus of LysW, respectively (Horie et al., 2009; Nishi­yama et al., 2009; Ouchi et al., 2013; Yoshida et al., 2016). Although LysX and ArgX both possess the activity to conjugate acidic amino acids to the C-terminus of the protein, only RimK has poly-α-l-glutamic acid synthesis activity (Kino et al., 2011). This unique characteristic of bacterial RimK may allow this enzyme to be used as a tool for poly-α-l-amino-acid production on an industrial scale (Kino et al., 2011; Hamano et al., 2013). However, the mechanism by which RimK catalyzes poly-α-l-amino-acid synthesis has not yet been clarified.

In the present study, we determined two crystal structures of E. coli RimK, in open and closed forms, in complex with the ATP analogue AMP-PNP at 2.05 Å resolution.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Protein expression and purification  

E. coli RimK was expressed as a C-terminally His6-tagged protein in an E. coli BL21(DE3) strain harbouring pET-29b(+)-RimK. The His6-tagged RimK was purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography using a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare). The His6-tagged RimK that eluted from the HisTrap HP column was desalted on a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare). The desalted His6-tagged RimK was treated with thrombin protease (Wako) and was again subjected to HisTrap HP column chromatography to remove the resulting His6-tag peptide. The sample was further purified by chromatography on a HiLoad Superdex 200 pg 16/60 column (GE Healthcare). The purified RimK was stored in 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.2 buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM dithiothreitol at −80°C. Macromolecule-production information is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Macromolecule-production information.

Source organism E. coli
DNA source E. coli
Forward primer 5′-GGGAATTCCATATGAAAATTGCCATATTGTCC-3′
Reverse primer 5′-GGGGTACCACCACCCGTTTTCAGGCA-3′
Cloning vector pET-29
Expression vector pET-29
Expression host E. coli BL21(DE3)
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced MKIAILSRDGTLYSCKRLREAAIQRGHLVEILDPLSCYMNINPAASSIHYKGRKLPHFDAVIPRIGTAITFYGTAALRQFEMLGSYPLNESVAIARARDKLRSMQLLARQGIDLPVTGIAHSPDDTSDLIDMVGGAPLVVKLVEGTQGIGVVLAETRQAAESVIDAFRGLNAHILVQEYIKEAQGCDIRCLVVGDEVVAAIERRAKEGDFRSNLHRGGAASVASITPQEREIAIKAARTMALDVAGVDILRANRGPLVMEVNASPGLEGIEKTTGIDIAGKMIRWIERHATTEYCLKTGGGTLVPRGSMAISDPNSSSVDKLAAALEHHHHHH

2.2. Crystallization  

The crystallization of RimK was performed by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. RimK solution (1 µl at 3.3 mg ml−1) containing 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 7.7 mM AMP-PNP, 7.7 mM l-glutamic acid and 7.7 mM magnesium sulfate was mixed with 1 µl reservoir solution (100 mM bis-tris propane pH 7.0, 210 mM sodium sulfate, 16% PEG 3350) and the sample was incubated with 500 µl reservoir solution at 20°C for four weeks (Table 2). The resulting RimK crystals were soaked in a cryoprotectant solution (90 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 90 mM bis-tris propane pH 7.5, 135 mM NaCl, 6.9 mM magnesium sulfate, 6.9 mM AMP-PNP, 6.9 mM l-glutamic acid, 190 mM sodium sulfate, 14% PEG 3350, 15% ethylene glycol) at 4°C. The RimK crystals were flash-cooled with liquid nitrogen.

Table 2. Crystallization.

Method Vapour diffusion
Plate type VDX plate (Hampton Research)
Temperature (K) 293
Protein concentration (mg ml−1) 3.3
Buffer composition of protein solution 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 7.7 mM AMP-PNP, 7.7 mM L-glutamic acid, 7.7 mM magnesium sulfate
Composition of reservoir solution 100 mM bis-tris propane pH 7.0, 210 mM sodium sulfate, 16% PEG 3350
Volume and ratio of drop 2 µl, 1:1 ratio
Volume of reservoir (µl) 500

2.3. Data collection and processing  

X-ray diffraction data were collected on the BL17A beamline at the Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Japan. The data sets were processed and scaled at 2.05 Å resolution using the HKL-2000 and CCP4 program suites (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997; Winn et al., 2011). Data-collection and processing statistics are provided in Table 3.

Table 3. Data collection and processing.

Diffraction source BL17A, Photon Factory
Wavelength (Å) 0.98000
Temperature (K) 100
Detector PILATUS3 S 6M
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 415.92
Rotation range per image (°) 0.2
Total rotation range (°) 0–360
Exposure time per image (s) 0.2
Space group C2
a, b, c (Å) 212.62, 121.63, 119.74
α, β, γ (°) 90, 118.74, 90
Resolution range (Å) 50.000–2.050 (2.120–2.050)
Total No. of reflections 875207
No. of unique reflections 164792
Completeness (%) 98.700 (98.800)
Multiplicity 5.300 (4.100)
I/σ(I)〉 21.2 (1.67)
R r.i.m. 0.080 (0.629)
R p.i.m. 0.033
Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) 34.650

2.4. Structure solution and refinement  

The structure of RimK was determined by the molecular-replacement method with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) using the atomic coordinates of the RimK–ADP complex structure (PDB entry 4iwx; Zhao et al., 2013) as the search model. The model was refined using the PHENIX suite and Coot (Adams et al., 2010; Emsley et al. (2010). All structural figures were produced using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org). Structure-solution and refinement statistics are provided in Table 4. The atomic coordinates of RimK have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB entry 5zct).

Table 4. Structure solution and refinement.

Resolution range (Å) 48.2130–2.0500 (2.0733–2.0500)
Completeness (%) 98.2
σ Cutoff F > 1.370σ(F)
No. of reflections, working set 155710 (4957)
No. of reflections, test set 8436 (272)
Final R cryst 0.196 (0.2871)
Final R free 0.240 (0.3305)
No. of non-H atoms
 Protein 17697
 AMP-PNP 248
 Ion 78
 Solvent 1186
 Total 19209
R.m.s. deviations
 Bonds (Å) 0.008
 Angles (°) 1.067
Average B factors (Å2)
 Protein 42.2
 AMP-PNP 49.2
 Ion 43.0
 Solvent 56.9
Ramachandran plot
 Most favoured (%) 96.59
 Allowed (%) 3.06
 Outliers (%) 0.35

The free R factor was calculated using a randomly selected 5% of reflections omitted from the refinement.

2.5. R.m.s.d. and B-factor calculations  

The atomic coordinates of the closed form (chain A) and open form (chain D) of RimK were superimposed and root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) values for the Cα atoms of the amino-acid pairs were calculated using PyMOL. The B factors were calculated by phenix.refine (Adams et al., 2010). The B factors of the Cα atoms of the amino-acid residues of the closed form (chain A) and open form (chain D) of RimK were extracted and plotted.

3. Results and discussion  

3.1. The crystal structure of E. coli RimK  

We determined the crystal structure of the E. coli RimK protein with a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue (AMP-PNP) at 2.05 Å resolution (Table 1). Since RimK requires ATP hydrolysis to catalyze polyglutamic acid synthesis (Kino et al., 2011), the RimK–AMP-PNP complex structure presented here may reflect a snapshot of the structure before the poly-α-l-glutamic acid synthesis reaction. Two RimK tetramers were found in the asymmetric unit of the crystal (Fig. 1 a). Tetramer formation by RimK is consistent with the previous gel-filtration and crystallographic analyses (Zhao et al., 2013). Interestingly, two different RimK conformations, an open form (coloured yellow) and a closed form (coloured green), were observed in a single RimK tetramer (Figs. 1 b and 1 c).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystal structure of the RimK protein. (a) Two RimK tetramers in the asymmetric unit of the crystal. The open and closed forms are coloured yellow and green, respectively. (b) The structure of the RimK tetramer (left). The protomers of the RimK tetramer are shown on the right. (c) The structures of the two different forms of the RimK promoter. The right and left panels present the open and closed forms of the RimK protomer, respectively.

3.2. Structural differences between the RimK protomers  

The open and closed forms of the RimK structure were superimposed and the r.m.s.d. values for amino-acid residue pairs were plotted (Figs. 2 a and 2 b). We found dramatic structural differences between the open and closed forms of the RimK protomer in the region of amino-acid residues 138–154 (region 1; Fig. 2 a). Region 1 is buried in the tetramer unit and does not directly contact the neighbouring tetramer in the crystal. Therefore, these structural differences may not be a consequence of crystal-packing effects. In the open form, region 1 forms an antiparallel β-sheet structure (Fig. 2 c, yellow). Intriguingly, in the closed form, the region including residues 142–151 of this β-sheet structure forms a loop structure (Fig. 2 c, green). The shortened β-sheet structure of the closed form is conserved among RimK homologues such as LysX (PDB entry 3vpd), ArgX (PDB entry 3vpc) and d-alanyl-d-alanine ligase (PDB entry 2dln) (Fan et al., 1994; Ouchi et al., 2013). However, the extended β-sheet structure observed in the open form, which was previously described in the ADP-bound RimK structure (PDB entry 4iwx), has not been reported in the structures of other RimK homologue. In addition, the region containing amino-acid residues 157–174 (region 2) differs structurally between the open and closed forms of RimK (Fig. 2 a). The region 2 α-helix in the open form is clearly shorter than that in the closed form (Fig. 2 d). Additionally, the region 2 α-helix positions were shifted by approximately 2 Å between the open and closed forms (Figs. 2 b and 2 d).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structural comparison of the open and closed forms of the RimK protomer. (a) The structures of the open and closed forms of RimK were superimposed and the r.m.s.d. value for each Cα-atom pair was plotted. (b) Superimposition of the structures of the open form (yellow) and closed form (green) of RimK. Secondary structures of the RimK region containing amino-acid residues 135–225 are presented at the top. Helical cylinders and arrows represent α-helices and β-strands, respectively. (c, d, e) Structural comparisons of the open and closed forms of RimK in region 1 (amino-acid residues 136–154) (c), region 2 (amino-acid residues 155–178) (d) and region 3 (amino-acid residues 202–222) (e). (f) The B factors for each Cα atom of the open and closed forms of RimK are plotted in yellow and green, respectively.

The region 3 loop (amino-acid residues 204–218) in the open form contains a short helix-like structure which is absent in the closed form (Fig. 2 e). Interestingly, the B factors of the region 3 amino-acid residues are quite high in the open form but not in the closed form (Fig. 2 f). This finding suggests that the region 3 loop is flexible in the open form. In the closed form the region 3 loop directly interacts with the region 1 loop, which only exists in the closed form; the region 1 loop forms an extended β-sheet structure in the open form (Fig. 2 c). Therefore, the interaction between the region 1 and 3 loops may stabilize region 3 in the closed form but not in the open form.

The open form of RimK contains an extended β-sheet structure in region 1, which expands the ATP- and substrate-binding groove compared with that in the closed form (Figs. 3 a and 3 b). The structural difference in the substrate-binding groove between the open and closed forms of RimK may regulate the substrate-binding and catalytic activities.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The structures around the ATP- and substrate-binding groove in the open and closed forms of the RimK protomer. (a) The surface structure of the closed-form RimK protomer. (b) The surface structure of the open-form RimK protomer.

4. Conclusion  

In the present study, we determined the crystal structure of the RimK protein. The RimK tetramer contained two structurally different RimK protomers in open and closed forms. The open-form structure has not been reported in the structures of other RimK homologues. RimK is a unique enzyme in the ATP-dependent carboxylate-amine/thiol ligase superfamily, as its substrates are large molecules such as the RpsF protein and poly-α-l-glutamic acid (Galperin & Koonin, 1997; Kino et al., 2011). RimK is the only enzyme that can catalyze a chain reaction to perform the polyglutamylation of RpsF and poly-α-l-glutamate peptide synthesis among the ATP-dependent carboxylate-amine/thiol ligase superfamily enzymes (Kino et al., 2011). The expanded ATP- and substrate-binding groove in the open-form RimK protomer may be suitable for incorporating large substrate molecules and may function in the specific enzyme reaction of RimK. The detailed structural information reported here will be useful for the design of RimK mutants which may be suitable for industrial applications.

Supplementary Material

PDB reference: RimK, 5zct

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs M. Takano and J. Ohnuki for discussions. We also thank the beamline scientists at the BL1A and BL17A stations of the Photon Factory and the BL41XU station of SPring-8 for their assistance with data collection. The synchrotron-radiation experiments were performed with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI; proposal Nos. 2012B1048, 2013A1036, 2014B1125, 2016A2537 and 2017A2558) and the Photon Factory Program Advisory Committee (proposal Nos. 2014G174, 2014G556 and 2016G515).

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering grant .

References

  1. Adams, P. D. et al. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 213–221.
  2. Collard, F., Stroobant, V., Lamosa, P., Kapanda, C. N., Lambert, D. M., Muccioli, G. G., Poupaert, J. H., Opperdoes, F. & Van Schaftingen, E. (2010). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 29826–29833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Fan, C., Moews, P. C., Walsh, C. T. & Knox, J. R. (1994). Science, 266, 439–443. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Galperin, M. Y. & Koonin, E. V. (1997). Protein Sci. 6, 2639–2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Hamano, Y., Arai, T., Ashiuchi, M. & Kino, K. (2013). Nat. Prod. Rep. 30, 1087–1097. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Horie, A., Tomita, T., Saiki, A., Kono, H., Taka, H., Mineki, R., Fujimura, T., Nishiyama, C., Kuzuyama, T. & Nishiyama, M. (2009). Nature Chem. Biol. 5, 673–679. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Kang, W.-K., Icho, T., Isono, S., Kitakawa, M. & Isono, K. (1989). Mol. Gen. Genet. 217, 281–288. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Kino, K., Arai, T. & Arimura, Y. (2011). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2019–2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Nishiyama, C., Kuzuyama, T. & Nishiyama, M. (2009). Nature Chem. Biol. 5, 673–679. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Ouchi, T. et al. (2013). Nature Chem. Biol. 9, 277–283. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  15. Yoshida, A., Tomita, T., Atomi, H., Kuzuyama, T. & Nishiyama, M. (2016). J. Biol. Chem. 291, 21630–21643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Zhao, G., Jin, Z., Wang, Y., Allewell, N. M., Tuchman, M. & Shi, D. (2013). Proteins, 81, 1847–1854. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

PDB reference: RimK, 5zct


Articles from Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES