Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2018 Jun 5;74(Pt 7):874–877. doi: 10.1107/S2056989018007995

Crystal structure, electrochemical and spectroscopic investigation of mer-tris­[2-(1H-imidazol-2-yl-κN 3)pyrimidine-κN 1]ruthenium(II) bis­(hexa­fluorido­phosphate) trihydrate

Naheed Bibi a, Renan Barrach Guerra a, Luis Enrique Santa Cruz Huamaní a, André Luiz Barboza Formiga a,*
PMCID: PMC6038643  PMID: 30002877

The first example of a homoleptic RuII complex with heteroaryl-imidazoles is reported in the meridional stereochemistry, exclusively. The supra­molecular hydrogen-bonded network reveals mutual N—H⋯N bonds between adjacent complexes.

Keywords: crystal structure, homoleptic complex, heteroaryl-imidazole, ruthenium(II), meridional isomer

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Ru(C7H6N4)3](PF6)2·3H2O, a novel RuII complex with the bidentate ligand 2-(1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyrimidine, comprises a complex cation in the meridional form exclusively, with a distorted octa­hedral geometry about the ruthenium(II) cation. The Ru—N bonds involving imidazole N atoms are comparatively shorter than the Ru—N bonds from pyrimidine because of the stronger basicity of the imidazole moiety. The three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network involves all species in the lattice with water mol­ecules inter­acting with both counter-ions and NH hydrogen atoms from the complex. The supra­molecular structure of the crystal also shows that two units of the complex bind strongly through a mutual N—H⋯N bond. The electronic absorption spectrum of the complex displays an asymmetric band at 421 nm, which might point to the presence of two metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) bands. Electrochemical measurements show a quasi-reversible peak referring to the RuIII/RuII reduction at 0.87 V versus Ag/AgCl.

Chemical context  

Since the first preparation of the tris­(2,2-bi­pyridine) ruth­enium(II) complex by Burstall (1936), its inter­esting electrochemical and photochemical properties have stimulated the preparation and characterization of numerous analogous ruthenium(II) complexes (Le-Quang et al., 2018; Dong et al., 2018; Linares et al., 2013). When asymmetric bidentate ligands are used to obtain homoleptic complexes, facial and meridional isomers can be obtained, depending on steric and electronic properties with important implications on chemical reactivity and spectroscopy (Metherell et al., 2014). An inter­esting class of asymmetric ligands are hetero­aryl-imidazoles, since a combination of electron-rich and electron-poor rings can be used to tune the electronic properties of the final complexes (Ratier de Arruda et al., 2017; Nakahata et al., 2017).

In this context, we have devised a synthetic procedure to obtain exclusively the meridional isomer of the first reported homoleptic RuII complex with the bidentate 2-(1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyrimidine (impm) ligand containing imidazole (im) and pyrimidine (pm) rings in the same unit.graphic file with name e-74-00874-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The title complex crystallizes with two hexa­fluorido­phosphates counter-anions and three lattice water mol­ecules. The total +2 charge for the complex is in very good agreement with molar conductivity and mass spectrometry measurements. We can conclude that all three ligands in the complex are neutral, not showing the typical ionization of the imidazole hydrogen atom. The mol­ecular structure of the cationic complex is shown in Fig. 1. It reveals a distorted octa­hedral configuration with meridional stereochemistry, with two imidazole units trans to each other as well as two pyrimidine units trans to each other. There is no correlation between the trans–cis orientation and bond lengths. For example, all Ru—Nim bond lengths are essentially the same within their standard uncertainties, and the same observation is valid for Ru—Npm bond lengths. However, Ru—Nim bond lengths are systematically shorter than Ru—Npm bonds by 0.03 Å, as expected from the stronger Lewis basicity of the imidazole unit. Averaged bond lengths are 2.054 (10) Å for Ru—Nim and 2.083 (8) Å for Ru—Npm. As a result of the bidentate nature of the ligands, coordination angles differ from the ideal 90° value with Nim—Ru—Npm angles ranging from 78.5 (2) to 78.7 (2)°, the latter being the main cause for the distorted octa­hedral configuration.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the homoleptic cationic complex [Ru(L)3]2+ (L = C7H6N4) with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features  

Although hydrogen atoms were not modelled for the three water mol­ecules present in the crystal structure, it is clear that a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network is formed by all species. Water mol­ecules cluster in triads and are close to two hexa­fluorido­phosphate anions in the lattice. The supra­molecular arrangement of water mol­ecules and PF6 anions may result in different hydrogen-bonded patterns, and the disorder in hydrogen-atom positions may explain the absence of electron densities close to oxygen atoms in difference maps. Possible donor–acceptor pairs involving the water oxygen atoms are included in Table 1. One of the water mol­ecules (O3) is hydrogen bonded to two N—H imidazole units, N6 and N10, Fig. 2 and Table 1. A rather strong mutual inter­molecular inter­action between two [Ru(impm)3]2+ units through one of the ligands involving centrosymmetric N—H⋯N pairs completes the three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network (Fig. 2).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯N4i 0.88 2.13 2.935 (7) 152
N6—H6⋯O3ii 0.88 2.00 2.871 (10) 171
N10—H10⋯O3iii 0.88 1.94 2.809 (10) 167
O1⋯F9     3.198 (11)  
O1⋯F12iv     2.793 (7)  
O2⋯O1v     2.703 (7)  
O2⋯F3vi     2.895 (10)  
O3⋯O2     2.784 (9)  
O3⋯F11vii     2.909 (8)  

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic; (vii) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Outline of the unit cell with axes showing all mol­ecular entities in the crystal. Details of the hydrogen bonds found for the [Ru(L)3]2+ unit are also shown. Dashed lines indicate the mutual N—H⋯N array between two symmetric complexes through one of the heteroaryl-imidazole ligands and two hydrogen bonds with water mol­ecules. Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 2, −z + 2; (ii) x + Inline graphic, −y + Inline graphic, z − Inline graphic; (iii) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 2; (iv) −x + 1, −y + 2, −z + 1. Water H atoms were not found, see text for details. Atoms of the PF6 anion in the upper right corner have symmetry code (ii).

Electrochemistry and electronic spectroscopy  

The RuIII/RuII potential for the [Ru(impm)3]2+ complex (0.87 V versus Ag/AgCl) was found to be inter­mediate between those reported for [Ru(im)6]2+ (0.295 V; Clarke et al., 1996), and [Ru(bpm)3]2+ (1.72 V; Ernst & Kaim, 1989), in which bpm stands for 2,2′-bi­pyrimidine. Since the reduction potential can be directly related to the t 2g orbitals of the complex, i.e. the HOMO (Possato et al., 2017; Eberlin et al., 2006; Nunes et al., 2006), the changes in potential can be accounted for by the high imidazole electron σ-donor ability, which tends to increase the energy of the HOMO, leading to a decrease of the reduction potential. Conversely, pyrimidine is a better π-receptor, decreasing the HOMO energy, therefore increasing the reduction potential (Lever, 1990). The electrochemical results reveal that the impm ligand was successfully used to tune these effects by combining them, as we had intended. The electronic spectrum of [Ru(impm)3]2+ revealed an asymmetric band centered at 421 nm (log ∊ = 4.14), indicating that two superimposed metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) bands may be present. This could be explained if two transitions from the RuII t 2g to two π* orbitals are observed. Moreover, the MLCT in [Ru(bpm)3]2+ is observed at 454 nm (Ernst & Kaim, 1989); this is an indication that the π* orbitals involved in the [Ru(impm)3]2+ transitions lie higher in energy.

Database survey  

Surveys of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.38, last update February 2018; Groom et al., 2016) and SciFinder (SciFinder, 2018) revealed no hits. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first crystal structure reported for a homoleptic ruthenium complex with heteroaryl-imidazoles. The survey revealed the synthesis of the cationic complex [Ru(impy)3]2+ (Stupka et al., 2005), in which impy is 2-(1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyridine, but no crystal structure was reported. However, we could relate to other similar crystals containing related cations [Ru(bpm)3]2+, [Ru(bpy)3]2+, or [Ru(bpz)3]2+, in which bpy is 2,2′-bi­pyridine and bpz is 2,2′-bi­pyrazine. [Ru(bpm)3]2+ contains a pyrimidine moiety with an Ru—N length of 2.067 (4) Å, similar to our complex, whereas [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [Ru(bpz)3]2+ show Ru—N bond lengths of 2.056 (2) and 2.05 (1) Å, respectively (Rillema et al., 1992). The only other complex in which impm appears as a ligand is with CuII and was reported by us (Nakahata et al., 2017 ). In the latter, similar to what we have observed in this work, the Cu—Npm bond length is 2.078 (2) Å, which is a bit longer than that of Cu—Nim [1.975 (5) Å]. The mol­ecular structure of [Ru(im)6]2+ was found to have an average Ru—N length of 2.099 (2) Å (Baird et al., 1998).

Synthesis and crystallization  

The ligand was synthesized following the same procedure as reported in the literature (Nakahata et al., 2017). The RuII complex was prepared by a mixture of one equivalent of RuCl3·3H2O (50 mg), 3.3 equivalents of the ligand (92 mg) and 10 ml of DMF. The mixture was stirred and heated to 423 K for 5 min, until the colour turned to green. After the addition of 45 µl of tri­ethyl­amine, the reaction mixture was kept under reflux for three h, resulting in a reddish purple mixture. This reaction mixture was filtered while still hot using a sintered glass funnel (G4). The filtrate was processed further with constant addition of ethanol and evaporation using a rotary evaporator until the volume reduced to almost 1.5 ml. The resulting reduced mixture was added dropwise to an aqueous solution of NH4PF6 (200 mg in 5 ml of milliQ water) and left in the refrigerator overnight to induce precipitation. Subsequently, the precipitate was filtered, washed with ice-cold water to remove excess NH4PF6 and dried in a desiccator. Yield: 83.42%. Analysis calculated for [Ru(C7H6N4)3](PF6)2: C, 30.41; H, 2.19; N, 20.26. Found: C, 30.51; H, 2.55; N, 19.78. ΛM (S cm2 mol−1): 162.44, within the typical range for a 1:2 electrolyte in water, 150–310 S cm2 mol−1 (Geary, 1971). ESI–MS (methanol): m/z 270.03 [M 2+]. FT–IR (cm−1): 559, 708, 796, 844, 1102, 1409, 1629, 1590, 1551, 1471. Crystals of the title compound were obtained by slow evaporation of a methanol:water solution of the complex.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. Hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon and nitro­gen atoms were added to the structure in idealized positions (N—H = 0.88, C—H = 0.95 Å) and further refined according to the riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C,N). During the refinement process, electron densities near oxygen atoms were not found in difference maps, resulting in missing hydrogen atoms for water mol­ecules. This is probably a consequence of disordered hydrogen positions resulting from weak inter­molecular inter­actions between lattice water mol­ecules and anions in the structure. The crystal was a strong absorber and exposure times had to be increased in order to achieve a reasonable completeness. In the end, we tested three different absorption correction methods in order to avoid artefacts and the multi-scan method gave the best results. However, a residual positive density was still found close to ruthenium (less than 1 Å) as a consequence of this insufficient absorption correction (Spek, 2018).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Ru(C7H6N4)3](PF6)2·3H2O
M r 883.49
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 13.0162 (5), 13.6078 (5), 18.3382 (7)
β (°) 99.937 (2)
V3) 3199.4 (2)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 6.02
Crystal size (mm) 0.10 × 0.07 × 0.07
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEX CCD detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2010)
T min, T max 0.625, 0.753
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 25003, 5754, 4930
R int 0.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.605
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.079, 0.229, 1.08
No. of reflections 5754
No. of parameters 460
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 3.62, −0.58

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2010), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b ) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447sup1.cif

e-74-00874-sup1.cif (761.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447Isup2.hkl

e-74-00874-Isup2.hkl (457.7KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447Isup3.mol

Detailed information on instrumentation, ESI-MS results, UV-Vis and FT-IR spectra, and cyclic voltammetry.. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447sup4.pdf

e-74-00874-sup4.pdf (518KB, pdf)

CCDC reference: 1842596

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

ALBF would like to express gratitude to Professor Judith Howard, Dr Dmitrii Yufit and Dr Horst Puschmann for an insightful short visit to the Crystallography Group at Durham in April 2017.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Ru(C7H6N4)3](PF6)2·3H2O F(000) = 1736
Mr = 883.49 Dx = 1.822 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 13.0162 (5) Å Cell parameters from 9950 reflections
b = 13.6078 (5) Å θ = 3.9–68.3°
c = 18.3382 (7) Å µ = 6.02 mm1
β = 99.937 (2)° T = 150 K
V = 3199.4 (2) Å3 Irregular, orange
Z = 4 0.10 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD detector diffractometer 5754 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 4930 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1 Rint = 0.039
φ and ω scans θmax = 68.9°, θmin = 3.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2010) h = −14→15
Tmin = 0.625, Tmax = 0.753 k = −14→16
25003 measured reflections l = −20→22

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.079 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.229 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1495P)2 + 5.4202P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
5754 reflections Δρmax = 3.62 e Å3
460 parameters Δρmin = −0.58 e Å3
0 restraints

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ru1 0.61116 (3) 0.76501 (4) 0.79791 (3) 0.0579 (2)
N1 0.4844 (4) 0.8111 (4) 0.8410 (3) 0.0657 (13)
N2 0.4208 (4) 0.9042 (5) 0.9198 (3) 0.0718 (15)
H2 0.416775 0.948958 0.953833 0.086*
N3 0.6712 (4) 0.8865 (4) 0.8591 (3) 0.0566 (11)
N4 0.6301 (4) 1.0022 (4) 0.9467 (3) 0.0582 (12)
N5 0.7422 (4) 0.7349 (4) 0.7524 (3) 0.0615 (13)
N6 0.8342 (5) 0.7645 (4) 0.6655 (4) 0.0724 (15)
H6 0.854183 0.790086 0.626150 0.087*
N7 0.5863 (4) 0.8536 (4) 0.7038 (3) 0.0602 (12)
N8 0.6760 (5) 0.9208 (4) 0.6123 (3) 0.0756 (15)
N9 0.6439 (5) 0.6722 (4) 0.8869 (3) 0.0681 (13)
N10 0.6215 (6) 0.5297 (5) 0.9368 (4) 0.0879 (19)
H10 0.600308 0.469110 0.942001 0.105*
N11 0.5437 (4) 0.6343 (4) 0.7531 (3) 0.0603 (12)
N12 0.5156 (5) 0.4675 (4) 0.7859 (4) 0.0782 (16)
C1 0.5046 (5) 0.8819 (5) 0.8901 (3) 0.0623 (15)
C2 0.3815 (6) 0.7869 (7) 0.8375 (5) 0.081 (2)
H2A 0.344267 0.738678 0.806039 0.098*
C3 0.3421 (6) 0.8436 (7) 0.8866 (5) 0.086 (2)
H3 0.272783 0.841756 0.896368 0.103*
C4 0.6070 (4) 0.9271 (5) 0.9011 (3) 0.0564 (13)
C5 0.7256 (5) 1.0409 (5) 0.9491 (3) 0.0619 (14)
H5 0.744892 1.096557 0.979591 0.074*
C6 0.7954 (5) 1.0035 (5) 0.9096 (4) 0.0644 (15)
H6A 0.862998 1.031426 0.913131 0.077*
C7 0.7666 (5) 0.9254 (5) 0.8651 (4) 0.0617 (14)
H7 0.814977 0.897782 0.837543 0.074*
C8 0.7483 (5) 0.7886 (5) 0.6927 (4) 0.0604 (14)
C9 0.8261 (5) 0.6748 (5) 0.7632 (4) 0.0686 (16)
H9 0.841453 0.627585 0.801761 0.082*
C10 0.8851 (5) 0.6927 (6) 0.7102 (4) 0.0749 (19)
H10A 0.948787 0.661564 0.705115 0.090*
C11 0.6671 (5) 0.8592 (5) 0.6664 (4) 0.0648 (15)
C12 0.5938 (8) 0.9800 (6) 0.5917 (5) 0.086 (2)
H12 0.595776 1.025988 0.553000 0.103*
C13 0.5090 (7) 0.9766 (6) 0.6239 (5) 0.086 (2)
H13 0.451247 1.018106 0.606409 0.103*
C14 0.5047 (6) 0.9149 (6) 0.6809 (5) 0.0757 (19)
H14 0.445435 0.914399 0.704742 0.091*
C15 0.6043 (6) 0.5838 (5) 0.8740 (4) 0.0726 (17)
C16 0.6922 (7) 0.6751 (6) 0.9600 (4) 0.080 (2)
H16 0.729082 0.729431 0.984397 0.097*
C17 0.6779 (8) 0.5869 (7) 0.9907 (5) 0.092 (2)
H17 0.702521 0.568118 1.040599 0.111*
C18 0.5512 (5) 0.5592 (5) 0.8004 (4) 0.0680 (16)
C19 0.4696 (6) 0.4537 (6) 0.7149 (5) 0.082 (2)
H19 0.443343 0.390098 0.700580 0.099*
C20 0.4588 (5) 0.5240 (5) 0.6637 (4) 0.0718 (18)
H20 0.425902 0.510496 0.614305 0.086*
C21 0.4959 (5) 0.6162 (6) 0.6833 (4) 0.0662 (16)
H21 0.487895 0.667494 0.647555 0.079*
P1 0.52669 (15) 0.72394 (12) 0.47516 (11) 0.0672 (5)
F1 0.6051 (4) 0.6755 (5) 0.4292 (3) 0.1094 (18)
F2 0.4541 (6) 0.7727 (7) 0.5259 (5) 0.143 (3)
F3 0.5632 (6) 0.8307 (4) 0.4586 (3) 0.120 (2)
F4 0.4894 (5) 0.6168 (4) 0.4927 (3) 0.117 (2)
F5 0.4400 (5) 0.7282 (4) 0.4045 (4) 0.119 (2)
F6 0.6122 (4) 0.7171 (3) 0.5476 (3) 0.0905 (14)
P2 0.17757 (17) 0.6704 (2) 0.65300 (15) 0.0922 (7)
F7 0.2160 (5) 0.5967 (8) 0.5979 (4) 0.166 (4)
F8 0.1418 (6) 0.7402 (6) 0.7124 (7) 0.161 (4)
F9 0.2594 (7) 0.7480 (6) 0.6365 (6) 0.150 (3)
F10 0.0961 (5) 0.5899 (5) 0.6745 (4) 0.129 (2)
F11 0.0909 (7) 0.7042 (13) 0.5912 (8) 0.233 (6)
F12 0.2637 (5) 0.6267 (5) 0.7163 (4) 0.1182 (19)
O1 0.2542 (8) 0.9735 (9) 0.6848 (6) 0.165 (4)
O2 0.2613 (8) 0.6190 (7) 0.9169 (7) 0.153 (3)
O3 0.4135 (6) 0.6699 (5) 1.0371 (4) 0.112 (2)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ru1 0.0485 (3) 0.0616 (4) 0.0631 (3) −0.00170 (17) 0.0080 (2) −0.01872 (19)
N1 0.056 (3) 0.069 (3) 0.073 (3) −0.013 (2) 0.014 (2) −0.027 (3)
N2 0.054 (3) 0.081 (4) 0.083 (3) −0.014 (3) 0.019 (3) −0.037 (3)
N3 0.049 (2) 0.059 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.001 (2) 0.005 (2) −0.013 (2)
N4 0.053 (3) 0.062 (3) 0.060 (3) −0.005 (2) 0.010 (2) −0.015 (2)
N5 0.051 (3) 0.069 (3) 0.062 (3) 0.004 (2) 0.005 (2) −0.018 (2)
N6 0.063 (3) 0.078 (4) 0.081 (4) −0.006 (3) 0.024 (3) −0.016 (3)
N7 0.059 (3) 0.053 (3) 0.066 (3) 0.003 (2) 0.003 (2) −0.014 (2)
N8 0.085 (4) 0.059 (3) 0.080 (4) −0.011 (3) 0.008 (3) −0.009 (3)
N9 0.068 (3) 0.072 (3) 0.064 (3) −0.007 (3) 0.011 (2) −0.009 (3)
N10 0.101 (5) 0.068 (4) 0.096 (4) −0.005 (3) 0.022 (4) −0.007 (3)
N11 0.052 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.071 (3) 0.002 (2) 0.016 (2) −0.014 (2)
N12 0.082 (4) 0.062 (3) 0.091 (4) −0.002 (3) 0.016 (3) −0.016 (3)
C1 0.050 (3) 0.072 (4) 0.066 (3) −0.006 (3) 0.013 (3) −0.020 (3)
C2 0.060 (4) 0.093 (5) 0.093 (5) −0.027 (4) 0.018 (4) −0.039 (4)
C3 0.058 (4) 0.106 (6) 0.100 (5) −0.020 (4) 0.029 (4) −0.047 (5)
C4 0.045 (3) 0.062 (3) 0.061 (3) −0.001 (2) 0.006 (2) −0.013 (3)
C5 0.059 (3) 0.064 (3) 0.062 (3) −0.011 (3) 0.009 (3) −0.012 (3)
C6 0.051 (3) 0.069 (4) 0.073 (4) −0.008 (3) 0.010 (3) −0.008 (3)
C7 0.046 (3) 0.068 (4) 0.070 (3) −0.001 (3) 0.008 (3) −0.009 (3)
C8 0.055 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.065 (3) −0.001 (3) 0.007 (3) −0.016 (3)
C9 0.056 (3) 0.072 (4) 0.076 (4) 0.008 (3) 0.007 (3) −0.015 (3)
C10 0.053 (4) 0.080 (5) 0.091 (5) 0.007 (3) 0.010 (3) −0.018 (4)
C11 0.062 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.071 (4) −0.008 (3) 0.005 (3) −0.019 (3)
C12 0.102 (6) 0.064 (4) 0.084 (5) 0.001 (4) −0.002 (4) −0.005 (4)
C13 0.087 (5) 0.067 (4) 0.096 (5) 0.009 (4) −0.003 (4) −0.001 (4)
C14 0.063 (4) 0.069 (4) 0.090 (5) 0.009 (3) 0.001 (3) −0.020 (4)
C15 0.076 (4) 0.065 (4) 0.077 (4) −0.001 (3) 0.015 (3) −0.002 (3)
C16 0.088 (5) 0.084 (5) 0.068 (4) −0.017 (4) 0.010 (4) −0.009 (4)
C17 0.110 (6) 0.094 (6) 0.071 (4) −0.003 (5) 0.010 (4) −0.012 (4)
C18 0.059 (3) 0.065 (4) 0.083 (4) −0.004 (3) 0.018 (3) −0.026 (3)
C19 0.077 (4) 0.072 (4) 0.099 (5) −0.012 (4) 0.017 (4) −0.033 (4)
C20 0.060 (4) 0.069 (4) 0.086 (4) −0.006 (3) 0.013 (3) −0.027 (4)
C21 0.052 (3) 0.075 (4) 0.071 (4) 0.004 (3) 0.012 (3) −0.023 (3)
P1 0.0650 (10) 0.0576 (9) 0.0735 (10) 0.0126 (7) −0.0032 (8) −0.0036 (7)
F1 0.093 (3) 0.132 (5) 0.101 (3) 0.020 (3) 0.011 (3) −0.038 (3)
F2 0.123 (5) 0.171 (7) 0.137 (6) 0.051 (5) 0.030 (5) −0.020 (5)
F3 0.166 (6) 0.067 (3) 0.117 (4) −0.012 (3) −0.005 (4) 0.010 (3)
F4 0.128 (4) 0.083 (3) 0.122 (4) −0.031 (3) −0.030 (3) 0.013 (3)
F5 0.109 (4) 0.105 (4) 0.121 (4) 0.005 (3) −0.046 (4) 0.020 (3)
F6 0.108 (3) 0.064 (2) 0.085 (3) 0.007 (2) −0.022 (3) −0.014 (2)
P2 0.0638 (11) 0.1057 (16) 0.1053 (15) 0.0035 (11) 0.0099 (10) −0.0108 (13)
F7 0.097 (4) 0.252 (10) 0.153 (6) −0.040 (5) 0.036 (4) −0.118 (7)
F8 0.099 (5) 0.140 (6) 0.254 (11) 0.001 (4) 0.054 (6) −0.085 (6)
F9 0.121 (6) 0.168 (7) 0.164 (7) −0.038 (5) 0.037 (5) 0.003 (5)
F10 0.087 (3) 0.122 (4) 0.186 (6) −0.016 (3) 0.047 (4) −0.048 (4)
F11 0.094 (5) 0.350 (16) 0.234 (12) −0.002 (8) −0.029 (6) 0.112 (12)
F12 0.093 (3) 0.135 (5) 0.122 (4) 0.011 (3) 0.005 (3) −0.025 (4)
O1 0.146 (8) 0.188 (11) 0.163 (8) −0.016 (7) 0.032 (7) −0.032 (8)
O2 0.148 (8) 0.113 (6) 0.198 (9) −0.018 (6) 0.028 (7) 0.019 (6)
O3 0.129 (5) 0.081 (4) 0.139 (5) −0.006 (4) 0.058 (5) 0.002 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ru1—N1 2.047 (5) C3—H3 0.9500
Ru1—N3 2.074 (5) C5—H5 0.9500
Ru1—N5 2.066 (6) C5—C6 1.355 (9)
Ru1—N7 2.084 (5) C6—H6A 0.9500
Ru1—N9 2.050 (6) C6—C7 1.353 (9)
Ru1—N11 2.089 (5) C7—H7 0.9500
N1—C1 1.314 (8) C8—C11 1.449 (9)
N1—C2 1.370 (9) C9—H9 0.9500
N2—H2 0.8800 C9—C10 1.362 (11)
N2—C1 1.335 (8) C10—H10A 0.9500
N2—C3 1.373 (9) C12—H12 0.9500
N3—C4 1.349 (8) C12—C13 1.339 (13)
N3—C7 1.337 (8) C13—H13 0.9500
N4—C4 1.322 (8) C13—C14 1.350 (12)
N4—C5 1.344 (8) C14—H14 0.9500
N5—C8 1.330 (9) C15—C18 1.446 (10)
N5—C9 1.351 (9) C16—H16 0.9500
N6—H6 0.8800 C16—C17 1.353 (13)
N6—C8 1.341 (9) C17—H17 0.9500
N6—C10 1.370 (11) C19—H19 0.9500
N7—C11 1.352 (9) C19—C20 1.331 (12)
N7—C14 1.359 (9) C20—H20 0.9500
N8—C11 1.320 (9) C20—C21 1.370 (10)
N8—C12 1.341 (11) C21—H21 0.9500
N9—C15 1.314 (10) P1—F1 1.576 (5)
N9—C16 1.379 (9) P1—F2 1.582 (7)
N10—H10 0.8800 P1—F3 1.574 (6)
N10—C15 1.352 (10) P1—F4 1.587 (6)
N10—C17 1.369 (11) P1—F5 1.565 (5)
N11—C18 1.333 (10) P1—F6 1.581 (5)
N11—C21 1.346 (9) P2—F7 1.565 (7)
N12—C18 1.342 (9) P2—F8 1.575 (8)
N12—C19 1.349 (10) P2—F9 1.566 (8)
C1—C4 1.449 (8) P2—F10 1.619 (7)
C2—H2A 0.9500 P2—F11 1.526 (9)
C2—C3 1.352 (11) P2—F12 1.584 (7)
N1—Ru1—N3 78.47 (19) N5—C9—H9 125.5
N1—Ru1—N5 173.6 (2) N5—C9—C10 109.1 (7)
N1—Ru1—N7 97.0 (2) C10—C9—H9 125.5
N1—Ru1—N9 87.2 (2) N6—C10—H10A 126.8
N1—Ru1—N11 95.8 (2) C9—C10—N6 106.3 (6)
N3—Ru1—N7 88.69 (19) C9—C10—H10A 126.8
N3—Ru1—N11 170.3 (2) N7—C11—C8 112.4 (6)
N5—Ru1—N3 96.7 (2) N8—C11—N7 126.5 (6)
N5—Ru1—N7 78.5 (2) N8—C11—C8 121.1 (7)
N5—Ru1—N11 89.6 (2) N8—C12—H12 118.9
N7—Ru1—N11 99.9 (2) C13—C12—N8 122.3 (8)
N9—Ru1—N3 93.1 (2) C13—C12—H12 118.9
N9—Ru1—N5 97.3 (2) C12—C13—H13 119.7
N9—Ru1—N7 175.6 (2) C12—C13—C14 120.7 (8)
N9—Ru1—N11 78.7 (2) C14—C13—H13 119.7
C1—N1—Ru1 114.2 (4) N7—C14—H14 120.4
C1—N1—C2 106.7 (6) C13—C14—N7 119.1 (8)
C2—N1—Ru1 139.0 (5) C13—C14—H14 120.4
C1—N2—H2 126.8 N9—C15—N10 110.0 (7)
C1—N2—C3 106.4 (5) N9—C15—C18 119.3 (7)
C3—N2—H2 126.8 N10—C15—C18 130.6 (7)
C4—N3—Ru1 115.0 (4) N9—C16—H16 126.1
C7—N3—Ru1 128.2 (4) C17—C16—N9 107.9 (7)
C7—N3—C4 116.7 (5) C17—C16—H16 126.1
C4—N4—C5 115.5 (5) N10—C17—H17 126.3
C8—N5—Ru1 113.2 (4) C16—C17—N10 107.4 (8)
C8—N5—C9 107.0 (6) C16—C17—H17 126.3
C9—N5—Ru1 139.7 (5) N11—C18—N12 126.9 (6)
C8—N6—H6 126.3 N11—C18—C15 113.5 (6)
C8—N6—C10 107.4 (6) N12—C18—C15 119.6 (7)
C10—N6—H6 126.3 N12—C19—H19 118.1
C11—N7—Ru1 115.4 (4) C20—C19—N12 123.8 (7)
C11—N7—C14 116.3 (6) C20—C19—H19 118.1
C14—N7—Ru1 127.8 (5) C19—C20—H20 120.5
C11—N8—C12 115.1 (7) C19—C20—C21 119.0 (7)
C15—N9—Ru1 113.5 (5) C21—C20—H20 120.5
C15—N9—C16 107.5 (7) N11—C21—C20 120.0 (7)
C16—N9—Ru1 138.9 (5) N11—C21—H21 120.0
C15—N10—H10 126.4 C20—C21—H21 120.0
C15—N10—C17 107.2 (7) F1—P1—F2 176.2 (4)
C17—N10—H10 126.4 F1—P1—F4 88.4 (4)
C18—N11—Ru1 114.7 (4) F1—P1—F6 89.8 (3)
C18—N11—C21 116.7 (6) F2—P1—F4 91.8 (5)
C21—N11—Ru1 128.6 (5) F3—P1—F1 92.2 (4)
C18—N12—C19 113.7 (7) F3—P1—F2 87.5 (5)
N1—C1—N2 111.4 (5) F3—P1—F4 179.3 (4)
N1—C1—C4 118.5 (5) F3—P1—F6 91.4 (3)
N2—C1—C4 130.0 (5) F5—P1—F1 90.8 (4)
N1—C2—H2A 125.9 F5—P1—F2 93.0 (4)
C3—C2—N1 108.2 (6) F5—P1—F3 90.3 (3)
C3—C2—H2A 125.9 F5—P1—F4 90.0 (3)
N2—C3—H3 126.3 F5—P1—F6 178.2 (4)
C2—C3—N2 107.4 (6) F6—P1—F2 86.4 (4)
C2—C3—H3 126.3 F6—P1—F4 88.3 (3)
N3—C4—C1 113.1 (5) F7—P2—F8 176.5 (6)
N4—C4—N3 125.6 (5) F7—P2—F9 90.2 (5)
N4—C4—C1 121.2 (5) F7—P2—F10 91.1 (4)
N4—C5—H5 118.7 F7—P2—F12 88.2 (4)
N4—C5—C6 122.6 (6) F8—P2—F10 87.4 (4)
C6—C5—H5 118.7 F8—P2—F12 88.6 (5)
C5—C6—H6A 120.8 F9—P2—F8 91.1 (5)
C7—C6—C5 118.4 (6) F9—P2—F10 177.0 (5)
C7—C6—H6A 120.8 F9—P2—F12 88.6 (5)
N3—C7—C6 121.2 (6) F11—P2—F7 89.5 (8)
N3—C7—H7 119.4 F11—P2—F8 93.6 (8)
C6—C7—H7 119.4 F11—P2—F9 95.4 (6)
N5—C8—N6 110.1 (6) F11—P2—F10 87.4 (6)
N5—C8—C11 119.6 (6) F11—P2—F12 175.4 (7)
N6—C8—C11 130.2 (7) F12—P2—F10 88.7 (4)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2···N4i 0.88 2.13 2.935 (7) 152
N6—H6···O3ii 0.88 2.00 2.871 (10) 171
N10—H10···O3iii 0.88 1.94 2.809 (10) 167
O1···F9 3.198 (11)
O1···F12iv 2.793 (7)
O2···O1v 2.703 (7)
O2···F3vi 2.895 (10)
O3···O2 2.784 (9)
O3···F11vii 2.909 (8)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (ii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (iv) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (v) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (vi) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (vii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) grants 2013/22127-2 and 2014/50906-9. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) grant . CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) grant . INOMAT (INCT for Science, Technology and Innovation in Functional Complex Materials) grant . FAEPEX (Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, à Pesquisa e Extensão) grant .

References

  1. Baird, I. R., Rettig, S. J., James, B. R. & Skov, K. A. (1998). Can. J. Chem. 76, 1379–1388.
  2. Bruker (2010). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Burstall, F. H. (1936). J. Chem. Soc. pp. 173–175.
  4. Clarke, M. J., Bailey, V. M., Doan, P. E., Hiller, C. D., LaChance-Galang, K. J., Daghlian, H., Mandal, S., Bastos, C. M. & Lang, D. (1996). Inorg. Chem. 35, 4896–4903. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  6. Dong, X., Zhao, G., Liu, L., Li, X., Wei, Q. & Cao, W. (2018). Biosens. Bioelectron. 110, 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Eberlin, M. N., Tomazela, D. M., Araki, K., Alexiou, A. D. P., Formiga, A. L. B., Toma, H. E. & Nikolaou, S. (2006). Organometallics, 25, 3245–3250.
  8. Ernst, S. D. & Kaim, W. (1989). Inorg. Chem. 28, 1520–1528.
  9. Geary, W. J. (1971). Coord. Chem. Rev. 7, 81–122.
  10. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Le-Quang, L., Farran, R., Lattach, Y., Bonnet, H., Jamet, H., Guérente, L., Maisonhaute, E. & Chauvin, J. (2018). Langmuir, 34, 5193–5203. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Lever, A. B. P. (1990). Inorg. Chem. 29, 1271–1285.
  13. Linares, E. M., Formiga, A. L. B., Kubota, L. T., Galembeck, F. & Thalhammer, S. (2013). J. Mater. Chem. B, 1, 2236–2244. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Metherell, A. J., Cullen, W., Stephenson, A., Hunter, C. A. & Ward, M. D. (2014). Dalton Trans. 43, 71–84. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Nakahata, D. H., Ribeiro, M. A., Corbi, P. P., Machado, D., Lancellotti, M., Lustri, W. R., da Costa Ferreira, A. M. & Formiga, A. L. B. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 458, 224–232.
  16. Nunes, G. S., Alexiou, A. D. P., Araki, K., Formiga, A. L. B., Rocha, R. C. & Toma, H. E. (2006). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1487–1495.
  17. Possato, B., Deflon, V. M., Naal, Z., Formiga, A. L. B. & Nikolaou, S. (2017). Dalton Trans. 46, 7926–7938. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Ratier de Arruda, E. G., de Farias, M. A., Venturinelli Jannuzzi, S. A., de Almeida Gonsales, S., Timm, R. A., Sharma, S., Zoppellaro, G., Kubota, L. T., Knobel, M. & Formiga, A. L. B. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 466, 456–463.
  19. Rillema, D. P., Jones, D. S., Woods, C. & Levy, H. A. (1992). Inorg. Chem. 31, 2935–2938.
  20. SciFinder (2018). Chemical Abstracts Service: Columbus, OH, 2010; RN 58-08-2 (accessed May 11, 2018).
  21. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  22. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  23. Spek, A. L. (2018). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 470, 232–237.
  24. Stupka, G., Gremaud, L. & Williams, A. F. (2005). Helv. Chim. Acta, 88, 487–495.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447sup1.cif

e-74-00874-sup1.cif (761.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447Isup2.hkl

e-74-00874-Isup2.hkl (457.7KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447Isup3.mol

Detailed information on instrumentation, ESI-MS results, UV-Vis and FT-IR spectra, and cyclic voltammetry.. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018007995/wm5447sup4.pdf

e-74-00874-sup4.pdf (518KB, pdf)

CCDC reference: 1842596

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES