Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Microcirculation. 2019 Apr;26(3):e12440. doi: 10.1111/micc.12440

Microvascular involvement in Systemic Sclerosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Didem Saygin 1, Kristin Highland 2, Adriano R Tonelli 3
PMCID: PMC6041191  NIHMSID: NIHMS953645  PMID: 29323451

Abstract

Microvascular changes play central roles in the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and represent major causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Therefore, clinical tools that can assess the microvasculature are of great importance both at the time of diagnosis and follow up of these cases. These tools include capillaroscopy, laser imaging techniques, infrared thermography and iontophoresis. In this review, we examined the clinical manifestations and pathobiology of microvascular involvement in SSc and SLE as well as the methodologies used to evaluate the microvasculature.

Keywords: microvasculopathy, vasculitis, capillaroscopy, iontophoresis, laser, scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus

1. Background

Microvasculature is the part of the circulatory system composed of vessels <300 μm in diameter, including arterioles, capillaries, and venules.1 Microvascular pathologies can manifest as vasculopathies or vasculitides. In general, vasculopathy refers to non-inflammatory vascular lesions, including those caused by immune complex deposition or intravascular thrombosis. On the other hand, vasculitis is characterized by leukocytic infiltration (polymorphonuclear or mononuclear) and fibrinoid changes of the vascular wall. Microvascular changes are the hallmarks of various connective tissue diseases, particularly systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Scleroderma is a systemic autoimmune disease associated with the triad of vasculopathy, autoimmunity, and progressive fibrosis. The vascular involvement encompasses macro- and microvasculopathy. Macrovasculopathy is a relatively rare manifestation of SSc characterized by a more pronounced atherosclerosis due to alterations in the vascular wall. In contrast, microvasculopathy is responsible for the initial manifestations of SSc (e.g. Raynaud’s phenomenon and nailfold capillary changes) and plays a central role in the development of digital ulcers, telangiectasias, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), scleroderma renal crisis, gastric antral vascular ectasia and coronary microvascular disease. The degree and extension of microvascular involvement can guide physicians to early diagnosis of SSc, and provide valuable information about disease progression and prognosis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a complex, multi-organ autoimmune disease characterized by generation of autoantibodies, circulation of immune complexes, and activation of the complement system. Vascular involvement is considered the leading cause of death in patients with SLE, and presents with vasculopathic and/or vasculitic features. The vascular disease of SLE can affect all types of blood vessels from any site. Medium- and large-sized vessel disease include accelerated atherosclerosis, thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid syndrome and vasculitis of visceral, coronary and cerebral vessels. On the other hand, microvascular involvement can present as livedo reticularis, cutaneous vasculitis, lupus nephritis, pulmonary vasculitis, PAH, and intestinal vasculitis.

In SSc, microvascular changes are typically noticed in the form of vasculopathy. However, in SLE, features of both vasculitis and vasculopathy can be observed. We focus the present review on the microvascular changes seen in SSc and SLE. We describe the clinical manifestations, pathobiology and methodologies used to test the microcirculation, emphasizing their value in assessing disease severity and prognosis.

2. Clinical manifestations and pathologic findings of microvascular involvement in SSc and SLE

2.1 Cutaneous microvascular involvement

The skin is commonly involved in both SSc and SLE. The morphology of these skin lesions depends on the intensity of vascular injury as well as size and location of the involved vessels. Clinical manifestations include Raynaud’s phenomenon, acrocyanosis, livedo reticularis, telangiectasia and cutaneous vasculitis.

Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a reversible discoloration of the digits triggered by cold exposure or emotional stress. It is found approximately in 90% of patients with SSc and 10–45% of subjects with SLE.2,3 The pathobiology of RP includes endothelial dysfunction, abnormal adrenergic receptor reactivity and inadequate release of neuropeptides or vasoactive mediators 4 The recurrent episodes of vasospasm can lead to microinfarctions and the development of digital ulcers or less commonly gangrene of the distal portions of digits.

Another cutaneous microvascular involvement seen in both SSc and SLE is acrocyanosis. This condition is characterized by bluish discoloration and sweating of hands and feet upon cold exposure. While RP occurs episodically and may be associated with pain, acrocyanosis is characterized by a painless sustained discoloration with no initial phase of pallor. Microcirculatory dysregulation results in narrowed arterioles causing cyanosis and compensatory dilation of capillaries and post-capillary venules causing sweating.5 Although acrocyanosis is less common than RP, the true incidence in SLE and SSc is unknown.

Livedo reticularis is also a cutaneous finding associated with microvascular involvement, found in 14–48% of patients with SLE. It manifests as a blanchable and purplish lace-like pattern predominantly located on lower extremities and aggravated by cold exposure. The underlying mechanism is spasm of dermal ascending arterioles with resultant swelling of cutaneous venules.6

In contrast to the aforementioned cutaneous manifestations, cutaneous vasculitis is an inflammatory microvascular disorder seen in 19–28% of patients with SLE and characterized by leukocytoclastic vasculitis with immune complex deposition involving the small vessels of dermis and/or subcutaneous tissue.7 Depending on the severity of inflammation and the size and location of the vessels involved, cutaneous vasculitis may present as petechiae, palpable purpura, nodules, bullous lesion, urticarial plaque and/or cutaneous infarction.

RP and acrocyanosis are characterized by non-inflammatory vasculopathic changes that can be seen in patients with either SSc or SLE and aggravated by exposure to cold, suggesting a disruption in the thermoregulation of cutaneous vessels in both diseases (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical manifestations of microvascular involvement in scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Scleroderma Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Cutaneous manifestations Nailfold capilaroscopy changes
Raynaud’s phenomenon
Acrocyanosis
Nailfold capilaroscopy changes
Raynaud’s phenomenon
Acrocyanosis
Livedo reticularis
Cutaneous vasculitis
Pulmonary manifestations Pulmonary arterial hypertension Pulmonary arterial hypertension
Pulmonary vasculitis
Renal manifestations Scleroderma renal crisis
Microalbuminuria with proteinuria
Isolated reduced glomerular filtration rate
Reduced renal functional reserve
Lupus nephritis
Renal vascular lesions including immune complex deposits, lupus vasculopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy, transmural necrotizing vasculitis
Gastrointestinal manifestations Gastric antral vascular ectasia Gastric antral vascular ectasia
Intestinal vasculitis
Coronary manifestations SSc related myocardial disease Coronary microvascular dysfunction of SLE

2.2 Pulmonary microvascular involvement

Pulmonary microvascular involvement includes PAH which is seen both in SSc and SLE, and pulmonary vasculitis which is particularly noted in patients with SLE (Table 1).

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is defined as a resting mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg.8 PAH is found in 8–12% of patients with SSc and is associated with severe Raynaud’s phenomenon, more telangiectasias and decreased nailfold capillary density, conditions that indicate a systemic microvascular dysfunction.9,10,11,12 PAH is less frequent in patients with SLE with a prevalence of 4.2%.13 The mechanisms leading to the progressive remodeling of small- and medium-sized pulmonary arteries remain largely unknown. SSc- and SLE-associated PAH share the vascular features observed in idiopathic PAH including intimal hyperplasia, smooth muscle hypertrophy, medial thickening and the presence of plexiform lesions. In addition, SLE-associated PAH may also reveal pulmonary vasculitis and immune complex deposition in the affected vessels.

Pulmonary vasculitis is a rare manifestation of SLE. In an autopsy study by Calamia et al., only 2 out of 120 cases were found to have true vasculitis.14 This rare entity may present with alveolar hemorrhage secondary to capillaritis.

2.3 Renal microvascular involvement

Most SLE patients develop nephritis at some point during the natural course of the disease. However, in SSc, the renal involvement is less common, but critically important since it increases mortality (SSc renal crisis). In addition, there are a variety of subclinical renal lesions recognized both in SSc and SLE (Table 1).

Scleroderma renal crisis represents a life-threatening medical emergency, characterized by accelerated hypertension and acute renal failure, which can be accompanied by microangiopathic hemolysis in half of the cases. It is observed in 4–6% of SSc patients.15,16 The pathobiology is poorly understood. Biopsy specimens show intimal thickening, myointimal cellular proliferation and glycoprotein and mucopolysaccharide accumulation in interlobular arterioles and small renal arteries, along with ischemic changes in glomeruli and tubules.

Renal microvascular involvement in SLE entails glomerulonephritis (lupus nephritis) and renal vascular lesions. Lupus nephritis is found in 50% of patients in the first year of diagnosis.17 Six classes of lupus nephritis have been described, based on the severity and extent of the lesions (focal vs diffuse), light microscopy (proliferative, nonproliferative, inflammatory, or sclerotic), immunofluorescence and electron microscopy findings.18 Renal vascular lesions are seen in 82% of patients with lupus nephritis and include vascular immune complex deposits, lupus vasculopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy and transmural necrotizing vasculitis.19 These vascular lesions originate from endothelial injury in small renal arteries, arterioles and/or glomeruli due to cell-mediated injury, immune complex deposition and anti-endothelial antibodies.

2.4 Gastrointestinal microvascular involvement

Gastrointestinal microvascular involvement is recognized as a very rare manifestation of both SSc and SLE, and includes gastric antral vascular ectasia in patients with SSc and SLE, and intestinal vasculitis in SLE (Table 1).

The majority of gastrointestinal manifestations in SSc are thought to be due to a neural dysfunction that progresses to smooth muscle dysfunction, atrophy and fibrosis. However, gastric antral vascular ectasia is characterized by dilation of mucosal capillaries in the antrum of the stomach. It is found in 1–6 % of patients with SSc and less commonly in patients with SLE.20,21 Clinical manifestations include anemia and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Intestinal vasculitis is a life threatening condition seen in 0.2% of patients with SLE.22 Histology reveals a small vessel arteritis and/or venulitis with inflammatory infiltration and fibrinoid necrosis in the vessel wall, thrombosis and immune complex deposition. Clinical presentation ranges from small ulceration to transmural infarction of the bowel.

2.5 Coronary involvement

The coronary artery system is composed of epicardial arteries, pre-arterioles and arterioles. Accelerated atherosclerosis of large epicardial coronary arteries has been widely recognized in both SSc and SLE, independently of cardiovascular risk factors. On the other hand, patients with SLE and SSc frequently report symptoms of myocardial ischemia in the absence of an obstructive coronary artery disease that are due to coronary microvascular dysfunction (Table 1).23 Coronary microvascular dysfunction is characterized by vasospasm followed by fixed structural alterations in small intramural coronary arteries and arterioles, contraction band necrosis and patchy myocardial fibrosis.24 Coronary microvascular dysfunction can present with heart failure and/or arrhythmias, and is considered to be a poor prognostic factor.25

3. Pathophysiology of microvascular changes and biomarkers of vascular disease in SSc and SLE

3.1. Microvascular disease in SSc

Scleroderma microvascular disease is characterized by microvasculopathy, vasospasm, procoagulant state with thrombosis and fibrin deposition, and defective angiogenesis.

Microvasculopathy

Endothelial cell injury is thought to be the initial event in development of vascular disease in SSc. Factors involved in this injury include autoantibodies, infections (e.g. CMV), cytotoxic T cells, and reactive oxygen species. Autoantibodies include anti-endothelial cell (AECA), anti-angiotensin II receptor (ATRA) and anti-endothelin type-A receptor (ETRA) antibodies. AECA is found in 28–85% of patients with SSc and induce endothelial cell apoptosis and secretion of chemotactic mediators.26,27,28 Clinically, AECA are associated with nailfold capillary abnormalities, digital infarcts and PAH.27,28 On the other hand, ATRA and ETRA activate their respective receptors on endothelial cells, augment vasoconstriction and induce obliterative vasculopathy.29 In fact, these autoantibodies have been shown to be associated with digital ulcers, PAH and higher mortality in patients with SSc (Table 2).30

Table 2.

Potential biomarkers of microvascular involvement in SSc

Clinical manifestations Candidate biomarkers
Nailfold capillary changes Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (Serum)
Endothelin-1 (Plasma)
VEGF (Serum)
Digital ulcers, infarcts Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (Serum)
Anti AT1R, Anti-ETAR (Serum)
Endothelin -1 (Plasma)
Endoglin (Serum)
Pulmonary arterial hypertension Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (Serum)
VEGF (Serum)
Endothelin -1 (Plasma)
Von Willebrand factor (vWF) (Serum, plasma)
Anti AT1R, Anti-ETAR (Serum)
CXCL-4 (Plasma)
Scleroderma renal crisis Anti-RNA polymerase I and III (Serum)

Affected endothelial cells demonstrate endothelial cell activation with increased leukocyte adhesion molecules (e.g. E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule -1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)), cytoplasmic vacuolization, ballooning, cytoskeletal rearrangement, loosening of tight junctions and apoptotic changes.31,32 Blood levels of endothelial cells detached from the affected vessels (i.e. circulating endothelial cells), soluble E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 are found to be elevated in patients with SSc and correlate with disease activity (Table 2).33,34 Histologically, affected vessels are characterized by neointimal lesion (proliferation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells, and collagen deposition in intima layer), adventitial fibrosis, perivascular mononuclear cell infiltration, pericyte activation, distortion and loss of capillary loops in a variety of organ systems. The characteristic neointimal lesions likely result from an aberrant endothelial cell repair. Different cells may be responsible for generating neointimal lesions, including activated pericytes, adventitial cells, resident fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells (endo-mesenchymal transition).

Vasospasm

Normal endothelial cells generate nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) which contribute to the normal vascular tone. NO is a potent vasodilator, which inhibits platelet aggregation, smooth muscle cell proliferation and cytokine-induced endothelial activation. On the other hand, ET-1 is a vasoconstrictor that mediates smooth muscle cell proliferation, fibrosis and inflammation. In SSc, microvascular endothelial cells have decreased expression of endothelial NO-synthase with reduced NO and increased ET-1 production, leading to a vasoconstrictive state.35 Elevated ET-1 levels were associated with higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure, more pronounced nailfold capillary changes and higher incidence of digital ulcers in patients with SSc (Table 2).36

Procoagulant state

A procoagulant state contributes to the vascular abnormalities in SSc. This state originates from the imbalance between coagulation and fibrinolysis, increased platelet activation and levels of pro-atherogenic oxidized LDL.37,38 Patients with SSc have elevated levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF), fibrinogen, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and/or tPA inhibitor, resulting in microvascular thrombosis and fibrin deposition.37 Of these factors, vWF was found to be associated with SSc severity and the presence of PAH (Table 2).39 Oxidized-LDL is elevated in SSc and may promote endothelial dysfunction via generation of free radicals, impairment of NO-synthase expression and induction of pro-inflammatory genes.40,41

Defective angiogenesis

Chronic tissue hypoxia caused by microvasculopathy, vasoconstriction and microthrombosis triggers angiogenesis. However, angiogenesis is dysregulated in patients with SSc42 This dysregulation results from the differential expression of proangiogenic (e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2)) and angiostatic (e.g. endostatin, soluble endoglin, CXC chemokine ligand- (CXCL) 4, 8, 9, 10) factors.42,43 VEGF has been associated with decreased nailfold capillary density and the presence of PAH.44,45 Endoglin was associated with telangiectasia and digital ulcers.46 In addition, bone marrow derived circulating endothelial cell progenitors (CEPs) may affect angiogenesis since these progenitors replace the damaged endothelial in ischemic and injured tissues. Patients with SSc have lower number of CEPs when compared to healthy controls, particularly in patients with advanced disease.47

3.2. Microvascular disease in SLE

Microvascular abnormalities in SLE include vascular deposits of immune complexes, non-inflammatory necrotic vasculopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy and lupus vasculitis. SLE is characterized by polyclonal activation of B cells and generation of auto-reactive memory B cells that secret a variety of autoantibodies. These autoantibodies form immune complexes which tend to deposit at vascular bifurcations and small vessels, and activate endothelial cells via Fcγ receptors.

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies are present in more than 80% of patients with SLE and considered to be involved in the microvascular dysfunction of SLE.48 These antibodies react with endothelial cell antigens like heparin-like compounds, heat shock protein-60, ribosome proteins, DNA, DNA-histone complexes, profilin II, plasminogen activator inhibitor, fibronectin and β2-glycoprotein.49 Anti-endothelial cell antibodies activate endothelial cells with upregulation of leukocyte adhesion molecules (E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1), secretion of chemokines (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCM-1), interleukin 1, 6 and 8), and recruitment of leukocytes into the vascular wall. AECAs also cause endothelial cell injury via complement- and antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. Serum levels of AECA were associated with cutaneous and digital vasculitis.50 Serum anti-C1q, anti-interleukin 1 and anti-nucleosome antibodies, as well as IL-6, urinary soluble VCAM-1 and MCM-1 were associated with lupus nephritis (Table 3).51

Table 3.

Potential biomarkers of microvascular involvement in SLE

Clinical manifestations Candidate biomarkers
Digital and cutaneous vasculitis Anti-endothelial cell antibodies
Pulmonary hypertension Antiphospholipid antibodies
Lupus nephritis Complement C4d (kidney biopsy, peripheral blood)
IL-6 (serum)
Anti-Interleukin 1 antibodies (serum)
Anti-C1q antibodies (serum)
Anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) (serum)
Anti-nucleosome antibodies (serum)
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (Urine)
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (urine)
Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) (urine)
Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) (urine)
Transferrin (urine)
Ceruloplasmin (urine)

Anti-phospholipid antibodies are present in 25% of patients with SLE and are related with arterial and/or venous thrombosis, development of PAH and recurrent fetal loss.52 These antibodies react with negatively charged phospholipids (e.g. cardiolipin, diphosphate-glycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphatidylethanolserine) that become exposed after endothelial injury, promoting thrombosis and exacerbating the initial injury. Finally, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are present in 15–20% of patients with SLE and associated with myocardial and renal involvements (Table 3).53

4. Methods to detect microvascular changes in SSc and SLE

A variety of methodologies have been developed to detect changes in the morphology and function of the microcirculation. Morphological changes can be assessed using capillaroscopy (nailfold and sublingual) and laser techniques (laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging). Functional changes with assessment of reactivity and dynamic function can be monitored with the same techniques by stimulating the capillaries with mechanical stimuli (post-occlusive hyperemia), thermal challenges (using local heating or cooling protocols) or iontophoresis of a number of medications (vasoactive agents are locally delivered to skin with the help of an electrical current).

4.1. Capillaroscopy

Capillaroscopy is a non-invasive tool that evaluates the morphology of capillaries using an optical magnification system. In patients with SSc, nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) abnormalities are referred as “scleroderma patterns” and are grouped in early, active or late forms of microangiopathy.54,55,56,57 Early phase microangiopathy is characterized by a relatively well-preserved capillary architecture with a few dilated capillaries and microhemorrhages. Active pattern typically reveals mildly disorganized capillary architecture with many dilated capillaries and microhemorrhages along with avascular areas. Late pattern shows severely disorganized capillary architecture with dilated capillaries and microhemorrhages, but more importantly, a marked reduction in the number of capillary loops with large avascular areas.

Given its importance, NC findings were included in the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism criteria for SSc diagnosis. Abnormal NC findings were found to be associated with the presence of PAH in patients with SSc, and correlated with PAH severity.58 In fact, when compared to SSc patients without PAH, those with PAH had a more severe capillaroscopy pattern.59 In addition, NC also helps differentiate healthy subjects from individuals with secondary Raynaud phenomenon (RP).60 Healthy subjects and individuals with primary RP have normal capillaroscopy findings, whereas patients with secondary RP usually have pronounced abnormalities. Interestingly the discrimination between primary and secondary RP was improved, although not majorly, when NC was used in conjunction with laser doppler imaging and thermography.60

Newer technologies allow the study of other accessible vascular beds, i.e. periodontal and sublingual capillaries. These include orthogonal polarization spectral imaging, sidestream dark field imaging, and oblique profiled epi-illumination imaging. Periodontal capillaroscopy of SSc patients revealed reduced number of capillaries, and increased capillary diameter and tortuosity compared to healthy controls.61 Similarly, sublingual microvascular assessment also showed reduced capillary density and perfusion in patients with SSc, in agreement with NC findings.62 Further study of the microvasculature in SSc using these non-invasive tools may provide valuable information on which patients with SSc are more prone to develop PAH, thereby increasing the screening efforts in this subset of patients.63

Limited reports exist on the use of NC in SLE. 64,65 NC in SLE reveals non-specific morphological alterations including tortuous, corkscrew and bushy capillaries with associated hemorrhage. These findings have been seen in approximately 75% of SLE patients and shown to correlate with disease activity.64 There are conflicting reports on the association between NC findings and organ involvement or RP in SLE.64,65

4.2. Laser techniques (laser Doppler flowmetry, laser Doppler imaging and laser speckle contrast imaging)

Laser techniques are non-invasive tools that assess skin capillary perfusion and include laser Doppler flowmetry, laser Doppler imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging. These laser Doppler techniques assess the skin capillary perfusion by measuring the Doppler shift induced by laser light scattering of moving red blood cells. On the other hand, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) measures the fluctuating granular pattern produced by laser light reflected on moving red blood cells. A comparison of different laser techniques is presented in table 4.

Table 4.

Comparison of characteristics of laser techniques.

Laser Doppler Flowmetry Laser Doppler Imaging Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging
Speed Fast at capturing changes in cutaneous perfusion Slow at capturing changes in cutaneous perfusion Fast at capturing changes in cutaneous perfusion
Reproducibility Poor* Good Good
Skin contact Needed Not needed Not needed
Area of assessment Single point* (≤1 mm3) Wide Wide
Depth of skin penetration 1–1.5 mm 300 μm
Disadvantage Regional heterogeneity of skin perfusion leads to high spatial variability Not good at recording rapid changes in the perfusion Not good for assessing areas of low perfusion, movement artifacts
*

Integrated probes are available that provide better reproducibility and capture a larger area.

Studies comparing laser Doppler techniques and conventional NC showed that cutaneous perfusion measured by laser Doppler flowmetry correlated well with NC findings. 66,67 Moreover, microvascular response to cold stimulus measured by laser Doppler flowmetry was associated with disease progression by NC.68 The advantage of laser Doppler techniques is that not only provide information about morphology but also on the dynamic behavior of microcirculation with different stimuli. This unique feature of laser Doppler techniques constitutes a promising approach and more studies need to be done to investigate its utility in clinical practice. One of the studies that was done by our group showed that patients with idiopathic PAH and SSc-PAH had lower blood flow index and greater vascular tortuosity in sublingual microcirculation compared to healthy controls by sublingual capillaroscopy, suggesting a systemic vascular dysfunction in both conditions.69 Morphological clues detected with capillaroscopy in this study lead to another study done by our group which showed that patients with idiopathic PAH also had decreased vasodilatory response to treprostinil iontophoresis by laser Doppler flowmetry.70 Therefore, we strongly believe that NC and laser Doppler techniques can be used together to complement each other in morphologic and functional evaluation of microcirculation and iontophoresis of vasoactive medications may be a promising tool in SSc-PAH to help to predict the response to specific PAH medications without associated systemic side effects.

Studies that explored the utility of laser Doppler flowmetry in SLE were less promising than those done in patients with SSc. For instance, the microvascular perfusion measured by laser Doppler flowmetry and its response to acetylcholine-iontophoresis were not different between patients with SLE and controls.71,72 However, SLE patients with RP had an impaired vascular response to acetylcholine- and sodium nitroprusside-iontophoresis suggesting that SLE patients with RP have more pronounced microvasculatory involvement than those without RP.72

Lastly, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a less time-consuming technique compared to NC and can be used to evaluate perfusion in the cutaneous microcirculation. Reports about LSCI are more limited compared to other laser techniques; however, LSCI showed lower perfusion in SSc patients than healthy controls and directly correlated with the NC findings seen in patients with SSc.73,74 Also, it was shown to have very good inter-rater reliability in SSc patients.75 However, more studies are needed for validation of LSCI in SSc. To our knowledge, no study has tested the utility of LSCI in patients with SLE.

4.3. Infrared thermography

Infrared thermography (IT) shows the body temperature distribution which can indirectly assess the cutaneous circulation. It captures the infrared radiation emitted from the body surface using digital thermal cameras and displays the finding as a visible information. This methodology has been investigated in patients with RP and SSc with digital ulcers. One study showed that hand thermography was very accurate at differentiating healthy controls from patients with RP; however, it might not be able to differentiate between primary and secondary RP.60 In a retrospective study done on digital ulcer development in patients with SSc, hand thermography images were taken at 23 °C right after hands were immersed in 15 °C water and 30 °C in a climate-controlled room at the time of the SSc diagnosis. Authors showed that patients with abnormal initial thermography were more likely to develop digital ulcers and required more frequent surgical debridement.76 To the time of this writing, no study has been done to evaluate the use of IT in patients with SLE.

5. Perspectives

Microvascular changes constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with SSc and SLE. Therefore, clinical tools that assess the microvasculature are of great importance both at diagnosis and follow up. Several biomarkers have been associated with microvascular involvement in SSc and SLE. As we improve the understanding of the mechanisms behind the microvascular dysfunction in SSc and SLE, we will be able to refine the methodologies used to assess the microvasculature and translate them into clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

List of abbreviations

SSc

Systemic sclerosis

SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus

RP

Raynaud’s phenomenon

PAH

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

AECA

Anti-endothelial cell antibody

ATRA

Anti-angiotensin II receptor antibody

ETRA

Anti-endothelin type-A receptor

VCAM-1

Vascular cell adhesion molecule -1

ICAM-1

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1

NO

Nitric oxide

ET-1

Endothelin-1

vWF

Von Willebrand factor

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

PDGF

Platelet derived growth factor

FGF-2

Fibroblast growth factor-2

CXCL

CXC chemokine ligand

CEPs

Circulating endothelial cell progenitors

NC

Nailfold capillaroscopy

Footnotes

Author’s contributions

DS participated in drafting the article and final approval of the manuscript submitted. KH and AT participated in design of the work, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted.

Competing interests

The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

Contributor Information

Didem Saygin, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Kristin Highland, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Adriano R. Tonelli, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

References

  • 1.Scioli MG, Bielli A, Arcuri G, Ferlosio A, Orlandi A. Ageing and microvasculature. Vasc Cell. 2014;6:19. doi: 10.1186/2045-824X-6-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tuffanelli DL, Winkelmann RK. Systemic scleroderma, A clinical study of 727 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1961;84:359–71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1961.01580150005001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khan F. Vascular abnormalities in Raynaud’s phenomenon. Scott Med J. 1999;44:4–6. doi: 10.1177/003693309904400102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sunderkötter C, Riemekasten G. Pathophysiology and clinical consequences of Raynaud’s phenomenon related to systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) Suppl. 2006;45(Suppl 3):169–72. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das S, Maiti A. Acrocyanosis: an overview. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58:417–20. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.119946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiménez S, Cervera R, Font J, Ingelmo M. The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003;25:3–12. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:25:1:3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vitali C, Bencivelli W, Isenberg DA, Smolen JS, Snaith ML, Sciuto M, et al. Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of the Consensus Study Group of the EuropeanWorkshop for Rheumatology Research. I. A descriptive analysis of 704 European lupus patients. European Consensus Study Group for Disease Activity in SLE. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992;10:527–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoeper MM, Bogaard HJ, Condliffe R, Frantz R, Khanna D, Kurzyna M, et al. Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mukerjee D, St George D, Coleiro B, Knight C, Denton CP, Davar J, et al. Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:1088–93. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.11.1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hachulla E, Gressin V, Guillevin L, Carpentier P, Diot E, Sibilia J, et al. Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: a French nationwide prospective multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3792–800. doi: 10.1002/art.21433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steen V, Medsger TA., Jr Predictors of isolated pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis and limited cutaneous involvement. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:516–22. doi: 10.1002/art.10775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ong YY, Nikoloutsopoulos T, Bond CP, Smith MD, Ahern MJ, Roberts-Thomson PJ. Decreased nailfold capillary density in limited scleroderma with pulmonary hypertension. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1998;16:81–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Prabu A, Patel K, Yee CS, Nightingale P, Situnayake RD, Thickett DR, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with lupus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:1506–11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haupt HM, Moore GW, Hutchins GM. The lung in systemic lupus erythematosus. Analysis of the pathologic changes in 120 patients. Am J Med. 1981;71:791–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90366-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Walker UA, Tyndall A, Czirják L, Denton C, Farge-Bancel D, Kowal-Bielecka O, et al. Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULARScleroderma Trials And Research group database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:754–63. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denton CP, Black CM. Scleroderma--clinical and pathological advances. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18:271–90. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seshan SV, Jennette JC. Renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus with emphasis on classification of lupus glomerulonephritis: advances and implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:233–48. doi: 10.5858/133.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:241–50. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000108969.21691.5d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu LH, Yu F, Tan Y, Qu Z, Chen MH, Wang SX, et al. Inclusion of renal vascular lesions in the 2003 ISN/RPS system for classifying lupus nephritis improves renal outcome predictions. Kidney Int. 2013;83:715–23. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ghrénassia E, Avouac J, Khanna D, Derk CT, Distler O, Suliman YA, et al. Prevalence, correlates and outcomes of gastric antral vascular ectasia in systemic sclerosis: a EUSTARcase-control study. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:99–105. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marie I, Ducrotte P, Antonietti M, Herve S, Levesque H. Watermelon stomach in systemic sclerosis: its incidence and management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:412–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Drenkard C, Villa AR, Reyes E, Abello M, Alarcón-Segovia D. Vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 1997;6:235–42. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hirata K, Kadirvelu A, Kinjo M, Sciacca R, Sugioka K, Otsuka R, et al. Altered coronary vasomotor function in young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1904–9. doi: 10.1002/art.22702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cannarile F, Valentini V, Mirabelli G, Alunno A, Terenzi R, Luccioli F, et al. Cardiovascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.12.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hill MB, Phipps JL, Cartwright RJ, Milford Ward A, Greaves M, Hughes P. Antibodies to membranes of endothelial cells and fibroblasts in scleroderma. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;106:491–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-867.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Negi VS, Tripathy NK, Misra R, Nityanand S. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in scleroderma correlate with severe digital ischemia and pulmonaryarterial hypertension. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:462–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Renaudineau Y, Revelen R, Levy Y, Salojin K, Gilburg B, Shoenfeld Y, Youinou P. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6:156–60. doi: 10.1128/cdli.6.2.156-160.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Becker MO, Kill A, Kutsche M, Guenther J, Rose A, Tabeling C, et al. Vascular receptor autoantibodies in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:808–17. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0442OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Riemekasten G, Philippe A, Näther M, Slowinski T, Müller DN, Heidecke H, et al. Involvement of functional autoantibodies against vascular receptors in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:530–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.135772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carvalho D, Savage CO, Black CM, Pearson JD. IgG antiendothelial cell autoantibodies from scleroderma patients induce leukocyte adhesion to humanvascular endothelial cells in vitro. Induction of adhesion molecule expression and involvement of endothelium-derived cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:111–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI118377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fleischmajer R, Perlish JS. Capillary alterations in scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980;2:161–70. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(80)80396-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Del Papa N, Colombo G, Fracchiolla N, Moronetti LM, Ingegnoli F, Maglione W, et al. Circulating endothelial cells as a marker of ongoing vascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1296–304. doi: 10.1002/art.20116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Denton CP, Bickerstaff MC, Shiwen X, Carulli MT, Haskard DO, Dubois RM, Black CM. Serial circulating adhesion molecule levels reflect disease severity in systemic sclerosis. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:1048–54. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.11.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sinici I, Kalyoncu U, Karahan S, Kiraz S, Atalar E. Endothelial nitric oxide gene polymorphism and risk of systemic sclerosis: predisposition effect of T-786C promoter and protective effect of 27 bp repeats in Intron 4. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:169–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sulli A, Soldano S, Pizzorni C, Montagna P, Secchi ME, Villaggio B, et al. Raynaud’s phenomenon and plasma endothelin: correlations with capillaroscopic patterns in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1235–9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ames PR, Lupoli S, Alves J, Atsumi T, Edwards C, Iannaccone L, et al. The coagulation/fibrinolysis balance in systemic sclerosis: evidence for a haematological stress syndrome. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:1045–50. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.10.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lima J, Fonollosa V, Fernández-Cortijo J, Ordi J, Cuenca R, Khamashta MA, et al. Platelet activation, endothelial cell dysfunction in the absence of anticardiolipin antibodies in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:1833–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scheja A, Akesson A, Geborek P, Wildt M, Wollheim CB, Wollheim FA, et al. Von Willebrand factor propeptide as a marker of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) Arthritis Res. 2001;3:178–82. doi: 10.1186/ar295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bruckdorfer KR, Hillary JB, Bunce T, Vancheeswaran R, Black CM. Increased susceptibility to oxidation of low-density lipoproteins isolated from patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1060–7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li D, Mehta JL. Upregulation of endothelial receptor for oxidized LDL (LOX-1) by oxidized LDL and implications in apoptosis of human coronary artery endothelial cells: evidence from use of antisense LOX-1 mRNA and chemical inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1116–22. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.4.1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hummers LK, Hall A, Wigley FM, Simons M. Abnormalities in the regulators of angiogenesis in patients with scleroderma. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:576–82. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, Simons M. Current concepts in normal and defective angiogenesis: implications for systemic sclerosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9:173–9. doi: 10.1007/s11926-007-0013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Papaioannou AI, Zakynthinos E, Kostikas K, Kiropoulos T, Koutsokera A, Ziogas A, et al. Serum VEGF levels are related to the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2009;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Choi JJ, Min DJ, Cho ML, Min SY, Kim SJ, Lee SS, et al. Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1529–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wipff J, Avouac J, Borderie D, Zerkak D, Lemarechal H, Kahan A, et al. Disturbed angiogenesis in systemic sclerosis: high levels of soluble endoglin. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:972–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brunasso AM, Massone C. Update on the pathogenesis of Scleroderma: focus on circulating progenitor cells. F1000Res. 2016:5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7986.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van der Zee JM, Siegert CE, de Vreede TA, Daha MR, Breedveld FC. Characterization of anti-endothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;84:238–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb08155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Praprotnik S, Blank M, Meroni PL, Rozman B, Eldor A, Shoenfeld Y. Classification of anti-endothelial cell antibodies into antibodies against microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells: the pathogenic and diagnostic implications. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;84:238–44. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200107)44:7<1484::AID-ART269>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Song J, Park YB, Lee WK, Lee KH, Lee SK. Clinical associations of anti-endothelial cell antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2000;20:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s002960000060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ahearn JM, Liu CC, Kao AH, Manzi S. Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus. Transl Res. 2012;159:326–42. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh NK, Agrawal A, Singh MN, Kumar V, Godhra M, Gupta A, et al. Prevalence and pattern of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in a hospital based longitudinal study of 193 patients of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2013;61:623–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pan HF, Fang XH, Wu GC, Li WX, Zhao XF, Li XP, et al. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Inflammation. 2008;31:260–5. doi: 10.1007/s10753-008-9073-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sulli A, Secchi ME, Pizzorni C, Cutolo M. Scoring the nailfold microvascular changes during the capillaroscopic analysis in systemic sclerosis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:885–7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.079756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Smith V, Pizzorni C, De Keyser F, Decuman S, Van Praet JT, Deschepper E, Sulli A, Cutolo M. Reliability of the quantitative nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment in a systemic sclerosis cohort: a two centre study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1092–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.115568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Accardo S. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:155–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Tuccio M, Burroni A, Craviotto C, Basso M, et al. Nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns and serum autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:719–26. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Caramaschi P, Canestrini S, Martinelli N, Volpe A, Pieropan S, Ferrari M, et al. Scleroderma patients nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns are associated with disease subset and disease severity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1566–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Riccieri V, Vasile M, Iannace N, Stefanantoni K, Sciarra I, Vizza CD, et al. Systemic sclerosis patients with and without pulmonary arterial hypertension: a nailfold capillaroscopy study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:1525–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Murray AK, Moore TL, Manning JB, Taylor C, Griffiths CE, Herrick AL. Noninvasive imaging techniques in the assessment of scleroderma spectrum disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1103–11. doi: 10.1002/art.24645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Scardina GA, Pizzigatti ME, Messina P. Periodontal microcirculatory abnormalities in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1991–5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Miranda S, Armengol G, Le Besnerais M, Levesque H, Benhamou Y. New insights into systemic sclerosis related microcirculatory dysfunction by assessment of sublingual microcirculation and vascular glycocalyx later. Results from a preliminary study. Microvasc Res. 2015;99:72–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cleveland Clinic. ClinicalTrials.gov (Internet) Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. Endothelial Function in Patients with Scleroderma or Cirrhosis With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension. (cited 2017 Feb 15). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01729611. NLM Identifier: NCT01729611. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ragab O, Ashmawy A, Abdo M, Mokbel A. Nailfold capilloroscopy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Egyptian rheumatologist. 2011;33:61–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Riccieri V, Spadaro A, Ceccarelli F, Scrivo R, Germano V, Valesini G. Nailfold capillaroscopy changes in systemic lupus erythematosus: correlations with disease activity and autoantibody profile. Lupus. 2005;14:521–5. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2151oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barbano B, Marra AM, Quarta S, Gigante A, Barilaro G, Gasperini ML, et al. In systemic sclerosis skin perfusion of hands is reduced and may predict the occurrence of new digital ulcers. Microvasc Res. 2017;110:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sulli A, Ruaro B, Alessandri E, Pizzorni C, Cimmino MA, Zampogna G, et al. Correlations between nailfold microangiopathy severity, finger dermal thickness and fingertip blood perfusion in systemic sclerosis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:247–51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rosato E, Rossi C, Molinaro I, Giovannetti A, Pisarri S, Salsano F. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging in systemic sclerosis impaired response to cold stimulation involvesdigits and hand dorsum. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:1654–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dababneh L, Cikach F, Alkukhun L, Dweik RA, Tonelli AR. Sublingual microcirculation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:504–12. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201308-277OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tonelli AR, Ahmed MK, Alkukhun L, Cikach F, Aulak K, Dweik RA. Treprostinil Iontophoresis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:1014–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1091LE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bongard O, Miescher PA, Bounameaux H. Altered skin microcirculation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1997;17:184–9. doi: 10.1159/000179227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.de Leeuw K, Blaauw J, Smit A, Kallenberg C, Bijl M. Vascular responsiveness in the microcirculation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is not impaired. Lupus. 2008;17:1010–7. doi: 10.1177/0961203308091968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ruaro B, Sulli A, Alessandri E, Pizzorni C, Ferrari G, Cutolo M. Laser speckle contrast analysis: a new method to evaluate peripheral blood perfusion in systemic sclerosis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1181–5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ruaro B, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Paolino S, Smith V, Cutolo M. Correlations between skin blood perfusion values and nailfold capillaroscopy scores in systemic sclerosis patients. Microvasc Res. 2016;105:119–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lambrect V, Cutolo M, De Keyser F, Decuman S, Ruaro B, Sulli A, et al. Reliability of the quantitative assessment of peripheral blood perfusion by speckle contrast analysis in a systemic sclerosis cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1263–4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hughes M, Wilkinson J, Moore T, Manning J, New P, Dinsdale G, et al. Thermographic Abnormalities are Associated with Future Digital Ulcers and Death in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43:1519–22. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES