Skip to main content
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2018 Apr 19;24(4):551–561. doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0525-4

Identification of genes associated with stress tolerance in moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal], a stress hardy crop

Bhavana Tiwari 1, Shahina Kalim 2, Neetu Tyagi 1, Ratna Kumari 1, Pooja Bangar 1, Paramananda Barman 1, Sanjay Kumar 1, Ambika Gaikwad 1, K V Bhat 1,
PMCID: PMC6041239  PMID: 30042612

Abstract

Moth bean is the most drought and heat tolerant cultigens among Asian Vigna. We performed comparative transcriptome analysis of moth bean cultivar “Marumoth” under control and stress condition. De novo transcriptome assembly was carried out by using Velvet followed by Oases softwares. Differential expression analyses, SSR identification and validation and mapping of pathways and transcription factors were conducted. A total of 179,979 and 201,888 reads were generated on Roche 454 platform and 48,617,205 and 45,449,053 reads were generated on ABI Solid platform for the control and stressed samples. Combined assembly from Roche and ABI Solid platforms generated 16,090 and 15,096 transcripts for control and stressed samples. We found 1287 SSRs and 5606 transcripts involved in 179 pathways. The 55 transcription factor families represented 19.42% of total mothbean transcripts. In expression profiling, ten transcripts were found to be up-regulated and 41 down-regulated while 490 showed no major change under moisture stress condition. Stress inducible genes like Catalase, Cyt P450 monooxygenase, heat shock proteins (HSP 90 and HSP 70), oxidoreductase, protein kinases, dehydration responsive protein (DRP), universal stress protein and ferridoxin NADH oxidoreductase genes were up-regulated in stressed sample. Genes which might be involved in moisture stress tolerance in moth bean were identified and these might be useful for stress tolerance breeding in moth bean and other related crops.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12298-018-0525-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Moth bean, Moisture stress, Transcriptome, RNA-Seq, Stress responsive genes

Introduction

Moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal] belonging to the family Fabaceae, is a drought and heat tolerant crop grown throughout the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. Despite its multiple uses as food, feed, medicine and cosmetics; cultivation of moth bean is restricted to marginal lands under rainfed conditions. Moth bean with short internodes and hairy branches grows to a height of 15–30 cm. Due to its harsh natural habitat, moth bean has evolved a few morphological and physiological features that impart tolerance to extreme environmental conditions (Kumar and Singh 1988). Moth bean is a herbaceous, short day crop having deep and fast penetrating root system, broad canopy, winy and semi-trailing growth habits. Because of these adaptive features, it can survive under drought stress and heat stress conditions. The impeding effect of climate change on growth and productivity of crop plants re-emphasizes the importance of understanding the series of cellular, biochemical and molecular processes that enable plants to tolerate abiotic stresses such as heat stress, moisture stress, salinity and extreme cold. Crops such as moth bean that are resistant or tolerant to these abiotic stresses are important biological systems to study the resistance mechanisms. Due to its short life cycle and small genome size, moth bean has the potential to be used as model plant for such genetic studies. Identification of genes involved in stress tolerance requires extensive information on regulation of gene expression as well as biochemical function of individual proteins involved in tolerance mechanism. In recent years, high throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms like Applied Biosystems SOLiD, Illumina Miseq and HiSeq, Roche 454 and Ion Torrent have been used extensively to generate genomic and transcriptome resources. Unlike genome sequence, transcriptome sequence is a direct indication of gene expression levels. For those species whose genomes have not been sequenced, de novo transcriptome assembly is becoming a common commercial (Zhai et al. 2014; Li et al. 2010, Duan et al. 2012; Lu et al. 2010) and powerful approach with high resolution. Transcriptome data mining is an efficient way to discover genes or gene families encoding enzymes involved in various important metabolic pathways (Wang et al. 2009; Varshney et al. 2009; Haas et al. 2013). In recent years, transcriptome analysis has been widely used for gene expression studies, discovering novel transcripts and finding differentially expressed genes (Garg et al. 2011; Li et al. 2013; Wenping et al. 2011).EST-SSRs are located in the coding region of the genome with high rate of transferability to related species. A large number of transcriptome studies have been conducted in many crop species in order to understand physiological basis of gene expression (Gupta et al. 1996; Varshney et al. 2005). Further, Gurjar et al. (2014) reported ESTs through suppression subtraction hybridization in moth bean. Genic SSR markers could be used for a variety of applications such as molecular mapping and genetic diversity analysis (Varshney et al. 2005). Considering the importance of this drought hardy crop in the changing climate scenario, this study was devised with an aim to identify genes related to stress tolerance and the regulatory factors expressed under control and moisture stressed conditions in Marumoth, a stress tolerant cultivar of moth bean. Gene expression analysis and functional classification has provided information on different stress responsive genes, transcription factors and signalling genes possibly associated with moisture stress in moth bean, thereby providing an insight into the molecular mechanism involved in drought tolerance.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation and transcriptome sequencing

Marumoth, the cultivar of moth bean used for this study was selected for moisture stress tolerance after an initial screening of a selected set of 240 accessions representing cultigens from all moth bean cultivating regions of India. The control plants were irrigated regularly (once in 7 days). In the moisture stressed plants, water was withdrawn 30 days after germination. Leaves were sampled from the control and treated plants 25 days after withdrawal of water from the treated plants when the soil moisture content was 20%. The soil moisture content was measured using soil moisture monitoring systems (Dataflow Systems Pty Ltd, New Zealand) at 45 cm depth. The total RNA was isolated from the control and stressed samples by using PureLink RNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA content was determined using a low volume UV–VIS spectrophotometer (NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, USA) and assessed for integrity on Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). mRNA libraries were prepared using Rapid Library Prep kit (Roche) and SOLiD Total RNA Seq kit as per manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced on Roche 454 GS FLX and ABI SOLid platforms respectively. Two systems were used in order to achieve better coverage at lower costs.

De novo assembly and functional annotation

High quality transcriptome reads from the control and stressed samples were assembled de novo using Velvet version 1.0.13 (Zerbino and Birney 2008) followed by Oases version 0.1.16 (Schulz et al. 2012). De novo assembly was carried out using different k-mer sizes (Surget-Groba and Montoya-Burgos 2010) for each sample. Parallel, de novo assembly was also run on CLC Genomics Workbench (Fig. 1). Finally, all the contigs generated by using Velvet/Oases Pipeline, CLC Genomics Workbench and the assembled transcripts for Roche 454 GS FLX data (assembled using Newbler and i-Assembler) were merged to generate super transcripts using CAP3 Assembler resulting in high quality and larger contigs. BLASTX alignment against the databases non-redundant proteins (NR), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) was performed, and the best aligning results were selected on the basis of Expect-value (E-value) of 10−5. BLAST2GO program was used for gene ontology (GO) annotations of assembled transcripts for describing biological processes, molecular functions, cellular components categories (Conesa et al. 2005), and functional classifications were assigned using WEGO software (Ye et al. 2006). The annotated transcripts were further used for identification of stress responsive transcripts. The stress related genes were obtained from online plant stress Gene Database (http://ccbb.jnu.ac.in/stressgenes/). This list was updated as per the new gene records in National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and was used for Stress Responsive Gene Identification. A list of 764 and 538 stress responsive transcripts were identified from control and stressed sample, respectively. For identification of transcription factor families in moth bean, the transcripts were searched against all the transcription factor protein sequences in Plant Transcription Factor database (Jin et al. 2014) using BLASTX with an E-value of ≤ 1e-5.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

An overview of de novo assembly process by using different Kmer sizes

Read mapping and transcript abundance (expression) measurement

FPKM (Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped) values were obtained by conducting RNA-seq experiment for all transcripts from both the samples by mapping onto the assembled transcriptomes (control + stress). Differential expression was ascertained for stressed condition by comparing the FPKM values of similar transcripts under stressed condition in relation to control. To evaluate the genome wide response of moth bean under control and stressed condition, expression heat map was generated by using MeV (Multi-experiment Viewer) software. Hierarchical clustering was done by using Euclidean distance matrix with an average linkage method using MeV.

EST-SSR search, primer design and validation

MISA (MIcroSAtellite; http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa) was used for SSR mining in moth bean. The minimum number of repeats used for choosing the SSRs was six for di-nucleotide repeats and four for tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide repeats. BatchPrimer3 software was used for Primers designing with the following criteria: distance between two SSRs was 100 bp, GC content of 45–60%, annealing temperature of 50–60 °C and PCR product size of 250–300 bp. A random set of 22 EST-SSRs (expressed sequence tags Simple-sequence repeats) markers were validated with 48 moth bean accessions (Table S4 and Table S5).

Results

De novo assembly of sequencing data

The transcriptome from the leaf tissue of the genotype Marumoth was analysed under control and moisture stress conditions using the Roche 454 and ABI Solid sequencing platforms. A total of 179,979 and 201,888 reads were generated on Roche 454 platform and 48,617,205 and 45,449,053 reads were generated on ABI Solid platform, for the control and stressed samples respectively. N50 length was 419 and 238 bp for control and stress samples respectively. The sequence data of both the platforms (Roche 454 and ABI Solid) have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database for both control and water stress conditions at NCBI under the accession number SRP032962. Following combined assembly from both the platforms (Roche and ABI Solid), 16,090 and 15,096 transcript contigs were generated for control and stressed samples (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Plot shows Marumoth combined assembly in control and stressed samples

Functional annotation of assembled transcripts

All the assembled high quality transcripts were annotated using BLASTX against NCBI non redundant protein (nr) database with an E value threshold of 10−5. Of the 16,090 and 15,096 transcripts generated for control and stressed samples, 12,808 and 9687 transcripts were functionally annotated from both the samples.

GO assignments and COG classification

Based on the BLASTX results against the NR database, Blast2GO program was used to obtain Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotations and categorizations of the annotations. GO classification was obtained for 18,362 transcripts out of a total of 22,495 annotated transcripts. GO terms were assigned to the resultant 18,362 unique sequences and classified into 32 GO classes including 15 biological processes, 9 cellular components and 8 molecular functions (Fig. 3). Under the biological process category, metabolic process (13,263) cellular process (10,368 sequences) and cellular component organization (2714) were prominently represented. Within the cellular components, cell (13,401), cell part (13,304) and organelle (8438) were the most highly represented categories. For the molecular function category, the largest proportion of genes were clustered into catalytic activity (10,014), binding (9309), and structural molecule activity (1269). Additionally, few sequences were assigned to death multi organism processes, molecular transducer activity and Enzyme regulator activity categories with less than 300 sequences.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Classification of Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the moth bean transcripts under biological process, molecular function and cellular component categories

To further predict and classify the possible functions of moth bean transcripts, these unique sequences from moth bean leaf transcriptome were aligned to the COG database. The results showed that 6779 transcripts (21.73% of all transcripts) were assigned to 23 COG categories (Fig. 4). Of these, the largest category was translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (1158 sequences), followed by post translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (968), general function prediction only (819), energy production and conversion (683) and carbohydrate transport and metabolism (515); whereas the clusters of cell motility (5) and nuclear structure (3) represented the smallest classifications.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

COG functional classification of transcripts

KEGG pathway annotation

Metabolic pathway prediction in Vigna aconitifolia was carried out by annotating the assembled transcripts with the corresponding enzyme commission (EC) numbers in the KEGG database using KAAS (KEGG automatic annotation server) analysis tool (Kanehisa and Goto 2000) against dicot plants as reference. The bidirectional best hit method was used to obtain KEGG Orthology (KO) assignment. A total of 31,186 KEGG classification was found for 2648 transcripts and classified into 181 different pathways (Table S1) corresponding to several KEGG modules; amongst these pathways, metabolism pathways were the most abundant group (8.57%), with most of them involved in energy metabolism (40.3%) and carbohydrate metabolism (23.7%). Ribosome and oxidative phosphorylation were the highly enriched categories, which were represented by 8.5 and 4.4% of the total KEGG annotated transcripts respectively.

Identification of transcription factors

Moth bean transcripts were searched against Plant TFDB (Jin et al. 2014) using BLASTX to identify the putative transcription factors. A total of 6058 transcripts (with an e-value  ≤ −5) matched in TFDB corresponding to 55 TF families representing 19.42% of total moth bean transcripts (Table S2). Most abundant TF family was basic helix loop helix (bHLH 8.76%), followed by Cys 3 His Zinc finger domain (C3H 7.69%), Ethylene responsive factor (ERF 6.43%), Myeloblastosis (MYB related 6.43%), C2H2 (6.0%), tri-helix (5.95%), NAC (4.15%) and WRKY (2.24%) while RAV and Growth-regulating factors (GRF) were the least abundant TF families (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Identification of transcription factor families and their abundance. Top 20 transcription factor families found in moth bean transcriptome based on BLAST results from PlnTFDB database

Differential expression analysis of assembled transcripts

Gene expression analysis of 16,090 (control) and 15,096 (stress) transcript contigs was carried out by mapping all high quality reads on assembled transcript contigs and FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of Exon per Million Fragments mapped) values were calculated. The FPKM values obtained by RNA-Seq were categorized into different categories depending on their abundance (Table 1) since expression analysis can provide important clues about the gene functions. In order to know the differential expression, heat map was generated by using log2 FPKM expression values. To identify differentially expressed genes, we screened genes that were found to be highly expressed and had statistically significant changes in expression as compared to control (Fig. 6). On the basis of common annotations, we found 541 transcripts showing differential expression in both the samples. Among those, 10 transcripts were up-regulated and 41 down-regulated in the stressed sample and 490 showed no major change under stress condition. Transcripts were considered significantly differentially expressed (> 2 or < −2 in log2). Up-regulated transcripts under stress conditions included catalase, Cyt P450 monooxygenase, HSP 90, HSP 70, oxidoreductase, protein kinases, dehydration responsive protein (DRP), universal stress protein (USPs) and ferridoxin-NADH oxidoreductase.

Table 1.

Expression level of assembled transcripts of mothbean

Description Control Stress
FPKM > 1000 93 263
500 < FPKM < 1000 116 126
50 < FPKM < 500 4219 2000
FPKM < 50 11,662 12,707

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Heatmap showing differential expression of moth bean transcripts. The unique transcripts annotations have been given to the right side. The colour scale represents log2 FPKM values

Frequency and distribution of different SSR types

Among the 31,186 transcripts generated in the study, 1287 SSR motifs were identified (Table S3). A total of 1161 transcripts contained SSRs. About 107 sequences had more than one SSR and 103 (Table 2) were compound type SSRs. It was observed that tri-nucleotide repeat motifs (846 or 65.7%) were the most abundant, followed by di- (279 or 21.6%), tetra- (83 or 6.4%), penta- (67 or 5.2%) and hexa-nucleotide (6 or 0.9%) repeat motifs (Fig. 7a). The number of SSR repeats ranged from 4 to 34, with four repeats being the most abundant, followed by six and five repeats as the next most abundant. Motifs with more than 16 repeats were rare. Among the dinucleotide repeats, AG/TC was the most abundant (48.7%). The other three major motifs were GAA/CTT (13%), AGA/TCT (6.85%), and AT/TA (20.4%) (Fig. 7b).

Table 2.

Statistics of SSRs identified in moth bean transcripts

SSR mining
Total number of sequence examined 31,186
Total size of examined sequences (bp) 9,993,394
Total number of identified SSRs 1287
Number of SSRs containing sequences 1161
Number of sequences containing more than one SSR 107
Number of SSRs present in compound formation 103

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Distribution of SSR repeat types and repeat motifs. a Different repeat type SSRs and b different repeat motifs and percentage of transcripts corresponding to them

Development of polymorphic genic SSR markers

A total of twenty-two SSR loci were randomly selected (Table. S4) to test for amplification and informative nature by analyzing on a germplasm panel of 48 moth bean accessions (Table. S5). Of the 22 loci tested, 14 produced clear amplicons of the expected size, two amplified nonspecific products and six failed to amplify the DNA product. Of the loci successful amplified, polymorphism was detected at only one locus (Fig. 1s and 2s) corresponding to the trinucleotide motif (TGC).

Discussion

Moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal) is a drought and heat tolerant grain-legume grown in arid regions. The ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR-NBPGR) in New Delhi, India, has more than 1000 accessions of moth bean collected from more than eight states of India. Cultivars such as RMO-40, RMO-225 and Marumoth are mostly commonly cultivated varieties in India (Gupta et al. 2016). To develop molecular markers, transcriptome sequencing and de novo assembly is an alternate method to non-genic SSR marker identification in both model and non-model organisms. De novo sequencing is specifically an effective approach for genome analysis without reference genome (Zheng et al. 2013). In this study, Roche 454 and ABI Solid sequencing platform provided high-throughput data and helped in identification of quality EST-SSRs for moth bean at a low cost. Functional annotation of moth bean transcriptome showed that the highly represented terms in the GO, KEGG and COG databases were also identified in addition to transcripts related to drought tolerance (S1). Catalase is the first line of defence against free radicals at cellular level. Therefore, their regulation depends upon the oxidant status of the plant cell. Catalase eliminates H2O2 by breaking H2O2 to form water and oxygen, thereby reducing toxicity (Gong et al. 2005). The present study revealed that catalase and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase activity were found to be up-regulated in stress as compared to control condition. Earlier studies had reported increased catalase activity in tolerant plants as compared to the susceptible ones (Raheleh et al. 2012). Catalase activity showed a significant increase in leaves of drought-stressed plants (Sofo et al. 2015). Further, in Brassica napus higher level of catalase activity was reported under drought stress conditions, thereby indicating that such plants may perform better under drought stress (Abedi and Pakniyat 2010). Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450 s) play crucial role in the synthesis of lignin, secondary metabolites, fatty acids, hormones, and signalling molecules in all plants (Werck-Reichhart et al. 2002; Kroetz and Zeldin 2002). Cytochrome P450 s influence a variety of metabolic pathways. In soybean, the expression of GmCYP82A3 (from soybean CYP82 gene) can be induced by various abiotic stresses and phytohormones molecules (Yan et al. 2016). Further, in Arabidopsis thaliana, expression of CYP709B3 was shown to be induced by salt stress and it plays a role in regulation of salt tolerance (Mao et al. 2013). The role of heat shock protein (HSP) during abiotic stress is also well documented (Wang et al. 2004; Song et al. 2014). HSPs are responsible for protein folding and can help in protein refolding under stress conditions (Buchner 1999; Young et al. 2001; Pratt and Toft 2003) and it was reported that the main role of Hsp90 is to manage protein folding, cell-cycle control, protein degradation, protein trafficking and signal-transduction. A recent study showed that Hsp90 interacts with the 26s proteosome and plays an important role in its assembly and maintenance (Imai et al. 2003). In the present study, we have detected overexpression of heat shock proteins (HSPs70 and HSPs 90) which play key roles in response to drought stress as well as heat stress (Fig. 6). Universal stress proteins (USPs) were also over expressed in stressed condition and helped in the survival of the plants under harsh conditions (Karolina et al. 2013). Earlier studies had demonstrated the prominent role of protein kinases in the regulation of cell differentiation, growth and development of plant system (Ling Ho et al. 2015). Serine/threonine kinase (SnRKs), a type of protein kinase also seems to be crucial in linking stress and metabolic responses, whose role in regulation of plant response to abiotic stress was recently identified. SnRKs are implicated in abiotic stress tolerance such as cold, salt, drought and heat as well as in biotic stress. Serine/threonine protein kinases show higher expression in abiotic stress condition (Afjal et al. 2008). Overall, this analysis suggested that dehydration responsive proteins (DRPs) play an important role in increasing plant tolerance to environmental stresses such as drought, cold and heat. DRPs were found to be up-regulated under moisture stress condition. In this study, we observed that many genes related to heat stress were also expressed in moisture stress condition. The transferable nature of EST-SSR markers within related species increases its utility in important plant breeding programmes. EST-SSR have been reported to be less polymorphic than genomic SSR in plants since DNA sequences are more conserved in transcribed regions (Varshney et al. 2005). However, there is a need to explore use of EST-SSRs as markers since presence of polymorphism in these regions are likely to indicate corresponding changes in gene expression, thereby indicating their greater utility in trait tagging for use in marker assisted breeding. Similar to the present study, several earlier studies reported the validation of EST SSR markers from the transcriptome data in legumes such as Vigna radiata, V. angularis, V. umbellata and chickpea (Choudhary et al. 2009; Gupta and Gopalakrishna 2010; Chankaew et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015; Kang et al. 2015). As no genome or transcriptome sequences of moth bean have been reported until now, present findings provide some insight into transcriptomes in moth bean. The study has identifed differentially expressed genes and related pathways from control and stress leaves samples of moth bean. De novo assemblies, functional annotations and their characterization with gene ontology and metabolic pathway analysis provided a range of stress-associated genes in moth bean and these findings will contribute to understanding of stress tolerance mechanism in moth bean and other related breeding crops. Transcription factors play crucial role in plant adaptability to abiotic stress at molecular level (Sharma et al. 2013). A total of 6058 transcripts matched in TFDB belong to 55 TF families. Within these bHLH, MYB related, C3H, ERF, NAC and WRKY TF families were found to be abundant in our study. The basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) proteins are a group of functionally diverse transcription factors found in both plants and animals. Many studies have reported that bHLH-type proteins act as transcriptional regulators and are involved in drought stress response in Arabidopsis (Jiang et al. 2009) and in rice the overexpression of OrbHLH001 enhances salt tolerance by altering ion flux in roots (Chen et al. 2013). As one of the largest TF families, MYB transcriptional factor is a multi functional gene family that have been found in response to plant abiotic stress. Among the members of MYB, TaMYB33 shows high identity to R2R3-MYB transcription factor which indicate stress tolerance in rice and maize. TaMYB33 TF was induced by different stresses such as salt, drought and ABA treatments, and its over-expression in Arabidopsis plant enhanced tolerance to salt and moisture stresses. Hence, the TaMYB33 became a model candidate gene for breeding of wheat for abiotic stress tolerance (Li-Chao et al. 2009; Qin et al. 2012). The regulatory role of WRKY TF family was also confirmed in Arabidopsis during salinity stress (Chen et al. 2013).

Conclusion

The present study has provided a comprehensive idea about the transcriptomes in relation to stress tolerance in moth bean. The transcriptomes generated were also helpful in marker development in moth bean. The transcripts identified have been observed to have a role in different metabolic pathways. The results provide genomic resources for understanding stress tolerance mechanisms in moth bean, thereby helping in acceleration of studies in functional genomics and their application in breeding programs. In addition, the SSRs identified in stress-associated genes in this study will be new resources for molecular breeding in moth bean and other related Vigna species.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank gratefully Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India and The Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for the facilities provided for this research. The funding from the ICAR-National Agricultural Innovation Project for this work is acknowledged. This work is part of the Bioprospecting and Allele Mining project of NAIP and we thank Dr. T Mohapatra, the CPI of the project for all the guidance and help in project execution.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12298-018-0525-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  1. Abedi T, Pakniyat H. antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2010;46:27–34. doi: 10.17221/67/2009-CJGPB. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afjal AJ, Wood AJ, Lightfoot DA. Plant receptor-like serine threonine kinases: roles in signalling and plant defense. Mol Plant Microbe Int. 2008;5:507–517. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchner J. Hsp90 & Co: a holding for folding. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:136–141. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01373-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chankaew S, Isemura T, Isobe S, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Somta P. Detection of genome donor species of neglected tetraploid crop Vignareflexo-pilosa (creole bean), and genetic structure of diploid species based on newly developed EST-SSR markers from azuki bean (Vigna angularis) PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y, Li F, Ma Y, Chong K, Xu Y. Over expression of OrbHLH001, a putative helix-loop-helix transcription factor, causes increased expression of AKT1 and maintains ionic balance under salt stress in rice. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen H, Liu L, Wang L, Wang S, Somta P, Cheng X. Development and validation of EST-SSR markers from the transcriptome of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choudhary S, Sethy NK, Shokeen B, Bhatia S. Development of chickpea EST-SSR markers and analysis of allelic variation across related species. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:591–608. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0923-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO a universal tool for annotation visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duan JL, Xia C, Zhao GY, Jia JZ, Kong XY. Optimizing de novo common wheat transcriptome assembly using short-read RNA-Seq data. BMC Genom. 2012;13:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garg R, Patel RK, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Bhattacharjee A, Yadav G. Gene discovery and tissue-specific transcriptome analysis in chickpea with massively parallel pyrosequencing and web resource development. Genome Anal. 2011;156:1661–1678. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.178616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gong HJ, Chen KM, Chen GC, Wang SM, Zhang CL. Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Sci. 2005;169:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gupta SK, Gopalakrishna T. Development of unigene-derived SSR markers in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and their transferability to other Vigna species. Genome. 2010;53:508–523. doi: 10.1139/G10-028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta PK, Balyan HS, Sharma PC, Ramesh B. Microsatellites in plants: a new class of molecular markers. Curr Sci. 1996;70:45–54. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta N, Shrivastava N, Singh PK, Bhagyawant SS. Phytochemical evaluation of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia. L) seeds and their divergence. Biochem Res Int. 2016;2016:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2016/3136043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gurjar K, Rampuria S, Joshi U, Palit P, Bhat KV, Mohapatra T, Sharma R. Identification of heat-related ESTs in moth bean through suppression subtraction hybridization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;173:2116–2128. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-1011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Prot. 2013;8:1494–1512. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imai J, Maurya M, Yashirodan H. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 plays a role in the assembly and maintenance of the 26S proteasome. EMBO J. 2003;22:3557–3567. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang Y, Yang B, Deyholos MK. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis bHLH92 transcription factor in abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009;282:503–516. doi: 10.1007/s00438-009-0481-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin JP, Zhang H, Kong L, Gao G, Luo JC. Plant TFDB 3.0: a portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucl Acids Res. 2014;42:D1182–D1187. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang YJ, Satyawan D, Shim S, Lee T, Lee J, Hwang WJ. Draft genome sequence of adzuki bean, Vigna angularis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8069. doi: 10.1038/srep08069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karolina L, Tkaczuk Igor A, Shumilin Maksymilian C, Elena E, Alexei S, Wladek M. Structural and functional insight into the universal stress protein family. Evol Appl. 2013;6:432–449. doi: 10.1111/eva.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kroetz DL, Zeldin DC. Cytochrome P450 pathways of arachidonic acid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipid. 2002;13:273–283. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200206000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar R, Singh NP. Effect of dates of sowing on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) Legume Res. 1988;21:54–56. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li P, Ponnala L, Gandotra N, Wang L, Si Y, Tausta SL, Kebrom TH, Provart N, Patel R, Myers CR. The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1060–1067. doi: 10.1038/ng.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li P, Deng WQ, Li TH, Song B, Shen YH. Illumina-based de novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of Amanita exitialis basidiocarps. Gene. 2013;532:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li-Chao Z, Guang-Yao Z, Ji-Zeng JIA, Xiu-Ying K. Cloning and analysis of salt stress-related gene TaMYB32 in wheat. Acta Agro Sin. 2009;35:1181–1187. doi: 10.1016/S1875-2780(08)60090-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ling Ho H. Functional roles of plant protein kinases in signal transduction pathways during abiotic and biotic stress. J Biod Biopros Dev. 2015;2:147. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu T, Lu G, Fan D, Zhu C, Li W, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li W, Huang X, Han B. Function annotation of the rice transcriptome at single-nucleotide resolution by RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2010;20:1238–1249. doi: 10.1101/gr.106120.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mao G, Seebeck T, Schrenker D, Yu O. CYP709B3, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase gene involved in salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pratt WB, Toft OD. Regulation of signalling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70 based chaperone machinery. EBM. 2003;228:111–133. doi: 10.1177/153537020322800201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qin Y, Wang M, Tian Y, He W, Han L. Over-expression of TaMYB33 encoding novel wheat MYB transcription factor increases salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:7183–7192. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1550-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raheleh R, Ramazanali KN, Ali G, Abdolreza B, Farzaneh N, Masoud R. Use of biochemical indices and antioxidant enzymes as a screening technique for drought tolerance in Chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) Afri Agri Res. 2012;7:5372–5380. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1086–1092. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharma N, Bhalla PL, Singh MB. Transcriptome-wide profiling and expression of transcription factor families in a liverwort, Marchantia polymorha. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:915. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sofo A, Scopa A, Nuzzaci M, Vitti A. Ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and their genetic regulation in plants subjected to drought and salinity stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:13561–13578. doi: 10.3390/ijms160613561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Song Aiping, Zhu Xirong, Chen Fadi, Gao Haishun, Jiang Jiafu, Chen Sumei. A chrysanthemum heat shock protein confers tolerance to abiotic stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:5063–5078. doi: 10.3390/ijms15035063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Surget-Groba Y, Montoya-Burgos JI. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next generation sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1432–1440. doi: 10.1101/gr.103846.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Varshney R, Nayak S, May G, Jackson SA. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang W, Viocur B, Shoseyov O, Alfman A. Role of plant heat shock proteins and chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq a revolutionary tool for transcriptomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wenping H, Yuan Z, Jia S, Lijun Z, Zhezhi W. De novo transcriptome sequencing in Salvia miltiorrhiza to identify genes involved in the biosynthesis of active ingredients. Genomics. 2011;98:272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Werck-Reichhart D, Bak S, Paquette S. Cytochromes P450. Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1:e0028. doi: 10.1199/tab.0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yan Q, Cui X, Lin S, Gan S, Xing H, et al. GmCYP82A3, a soybean cytochrome P450 family gene involved in the jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathway, enhances plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0162253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z. WEGO a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucl Acids Res. 2006;34:W293–W297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Young JC, Moarefi J, Harti FU. Hsp90 a specialized but essential protein folding tool. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:267–273. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200104079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhai LL, Xu L, Wang Y, Cheng H, Chen YL, Gong YQ, Liu LW. Novel and useful genic-SSR markers from de novo transcriptome sequencing of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Mol Breed. 2014;33:611–624. doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-9978-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zheng X, Pan C, Diao Y, You Y, Yang C. Development of microsatellite markers by transcriptome sequencing in two species of Amorphophallus (Araceae) BMC Genomics. 2013;14:490. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES