Abstract
Human kidney stone disease (KSD) causes significant morbidity and public health burden worldwide. The etiology of KSD is heterogeneous, ranging from monogenic defects to complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors. However, the genetic defects causing KSD in the majority of affected families are still unknown. Here, we report the discovery of mutations of SCN10A, encoding NaV1.8 α subunit of voltage-gated sodium channel, in families with KSD. The region on chromosome 3 where SCN10A locates was initially identified in a large family with KSD by genome-wide linkage analysis and exome sequencing. Two mutations (p.N909K and p.K1809R) in the same allele of SCN10A co-segregated with KSD in the affected family. Additional mutation (p.V1149M) of SCN10A was identified in another affected family, strongly supporting the causal role of SCN10A for KSD. The amino acids at these three positions, N909, K1809, and V1149, are highly conserved in vertebrate evolution, indicating their structural and functional significances. NaV1.8 α subunit mRNA and protein were found to express in human kidney tissues. The mutant proteins expressed in cultured cells were unstable and causing reduced current density as analyzed by whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Thus, loss-of-function mutations of SCN10A were associated with KSD in the families studied.
Introduction
Kidney stone disease (KSD) is a common disorder affecting approximately 1–5% of the population worldwide1. The causes of KSD are heterogeneous, ranging from monogenic defect to complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors2. The majority of kidney stones (~80%) are composed of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate3,4. Studies in families and twins have indicated a genetic predisposition to calcium stones5,6. Family-based or case-control studies of individual candidate genes in KSD have shown the association with variations in several genes, including osteopontin (OPN)7,8, calcitonin receptor (CTR)9, vitamin D receptor (VDR)10,11, and calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR)12. A high-throughput genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified sequence variations in claudin 14 (CLDN14), encoding for the tight junction protein expressed in the kidney, liver, and inner ear, associated with KSD13.
Previously, our group studied KSD in the Northeastern (NE) population of Thailand, where the disease is prevalent. We have demonstrated that the relative risk of KSD among first-degree relatives and members of affected families was higher than that of the general population (λR = 3.18), indicating familial aggregation and the role of genetic factors in the pathogenesis14. We then evaluated genetic variations associated with KSD in the patients by genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) distributed within 8 candidate genes, including TFF1, S100A8, S100A9, S100A12, AMBP, SPP1, UMOD, and F2, encoding stone inhibitor proteins. We found that genetic variation of F2 was associated with KSD risk in the NE Thai female patients15 and later reported the association between F2 variant (p.T165M) and KSD in the NE Thai female patients16. However, the F2 variant (p.T165M) was likely a modifying, not a disease-causing, variation associated with KSD in this population because both variants (T and M) were observed in the patient and control groups with different frequencies. In the present work, we continued the study to identify disease-causing genes for KSD by genome-wide linkage analysis and exome sequencing in the affected families. Here, we provide the evidence that loss-of-function mutations of sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 10, SCN10A (MIM: 604427), encoding the NaV1.8 α subunit of voltage-gated sodium channel, associate with KSD in the families studied.
Results
Subjects and clinical study
A large index family with KSD (UBRS082) was selected from 180 unrelated families for genome-wide linkage analysis and exome sequencing. Seventeen family members were investigated for KSD by kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) radiography, clinical history, physical examination, blood and urine biochemical analyses (Table 1). The KSD phenotype was first detected in the proband (II-2) and inherited as autosomal dominant model (Fig. 1A) with 7 affected and 10 unaffected members; the father in the first generation (I:1) who was deceased was unknown for diagnosis status. All affected members were new KSD cases diagnosed at different times. No hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria or hyperphosphaturia was observed in this family. Clinical characteristics and symptoms were summarized in Table 1. All stones present in the affected members were radio opaque, indicating their calcium content. Three affected members (II:1, II:2, and III:2) had surgery long time ago; their stones were unable to be collected for component analysis. Our previous data showed that calcium stones with opaque appearance on KUB were observed in about 88% of stones analyzed in this population14.
Table 1.
Sample No. | Gender | Age | Age of Onset* | KUB result | Site/Side of stone | No. of stone | Treatment | Other Symptoms | Diagnosis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dysuria | Hematuria | Pass Stone | Turbid Urine | |||||||||
II:1 | Male | 54 | 15 | Negative | Unknown/ Right | N/A | Surgery | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | renal stone (surgical scar1) |
II:2 | Female | 51 | 38 | Positive | Ureter/ Right | 1 | Surgery | Yes | No | No | No | ureteric stone (KUB2) |
II:4 | Male | 47 | 30 | Positive | Renal/Right | 1 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | renal stone (KUB) |
II:5 | Male | 39 | N/A | Positive | Renal/Left | 1 | No | No | No | No | No | renal stone (KUB) |
II:6 | Male | 36 | 13 | Positive | Renal/ Both | >5 | No | Yes | No | No | No | renal stone (KUB) |
III:2 | Male | 31 | 21 | Positive | Renal/Left | >5 | Surgery | Yes | No | No | No | renal stone (KUB) |
III:4 | Male | 27 | 21 | Negative | N/A | N/A | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | renal stone (strong clinical history3) |
I:2 | Female | 76 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
II:3 | Female | 49 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
II:7 | Female | 35 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
II:8 | Female | 53 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
II:9 | Female | 45 | Negative | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | no stone | |||
II:10 | Female | 39 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
III:1 | Male | 33 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
III:3 | Female | 29 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
III:5 | Male | 17 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone | |||
III:6 | Male | 15 | Negative | No | No | No | No | No | no stone |
1The patient had surgical scar of kidney stone removal.
2The patient had positive results of kidney–ureter–bladder (KUB) radiography.
3The patient had strong clinical history as justified from the presence of several symptoms associated with kidney stone, especially hematuria and stone passage.
*Age at the onset of kidney stone disease.
Genome-wide linkage analysis and exome sequencing
The SNP-genotyping datasets from either SNP 10 K or SNP 1 M microarrays of this family were analyzed by using easyLINKAGE software17, in the autosomal dominant model. The regions with Max LOD scores analyzed by two-point or multi-point parametric mode or in non-parametric mode are related to each other (Supplementary Table S1). We selected the continuous regions from the Max LOD scores of multi-point parametric mode on chromosomes 3, (Max LOD = 3.75), chromosome 7 (Max LOD = 3.01), and chromosome 17 (Max LOD = 2.98) for further analyses (Fig. 2). These three chromosomal regions covered the intervals of 15.2 Mb, 6.3 Mb, and 5.8 Mb, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Chromosome [position] | Size (Mb) | No. variations | No. exonic variations | No. exonic variations in affected (dominant model) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synonymous | Non synonymous | In/Del | Stop gain/loss | ||||
3 [30, 303, 774–45, 507, 305] | 15.2 | 881 | 170 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
7 [111, 578, 521–117, 907, 989] | 6.3 | 166 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 [71, 726, 922–77, 477, 826] | 5.8 | 885 | 183 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 27.3 | 1,932 | 374 | 18 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
DNA samples from two affected members (II:5 and II:6) and one unaffected member (II:7) were selected for exome capturing and sequencing (Illumina, USA). Genetic variations in the candidate regions on chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 in these three family members, containing 1,932 variations with the average read depth of 38x, were filtered by exclusion of synonymous variations but selection for non-synonymous, stop, gain/loss, and short insertion or deletion (In/Del) variations. After the filtration, 19 variations remained for further analysis (Table 2).
The impact of amino acid changes on the protein structures and functions of the 19 candidate variations were predicted by using 6 web-based programs. Four variations, including two rare variations in SCN10A [GenBank: NM_006514.3; c.2727 C > A (p.N909K) and c.5426 A > G (p.K1809R) (MIM: 604427)] (rs567269429 and rs561166361), one reported variation in XIRP1 [GenBank: NM_194293.2; c.4501 G > A (p.V1501M) (MIM: 609777)] (rs58805228), and one rare variation in TTYH2 [GenBank: NM_032646.5; c.531 G > A (p.M177I) (MIM: 608855)] (rs371502920) were predicted as disease-causing or damaging by at least 3 of 6 programs (Supplementary Table S2).
Genotyping of genetic variations in family members and normal control subjects
The four variations predicted to be pathogenic or damaging were genotyped in all affected and unaffected members of the index family. All variations co-segregated with KSD in the family (Supplementary Table S3). These four variations were further tested in DNA samples from normal control subjects (n = 180), living in the same geographical area, by PCR-HRM analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1). Two variations in SCN10A (p.N909K and p.K1809R) were not present in the 180 normal control subjects tested while the two variations in XIRP1 (p.V1501M) and TTYH2 (p.M177I) were observed in 24 and 3 normal control subjects, respectively (Supplementary Table S3). Furthermore, TTYH2 (p.M177I) was present but did not co-segregate with KSD in 4 affected families (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, the variations in XIRP1 (p.V1501M) and in TTYH2 (p.M177I) were excluded as they might not be implicated in KSD. However, the two variations in SCN10A (p.N909K and p.K1809R) showed their segregation in this family, suggesting that SCN10A was involved in KSD in this family. Haplotype analysis suggested that the allele with two variations was inherited from the father (I:1) who was deceased (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S3).
Mutation screening and analysis of genetic variations
We genotyped these two variations and screened all 27 exons of SCN10A in the DNA samples from 180 patients with KSD by the PCR-HRM and Sanger sequencing. A total of 29 variations in SCN10A (1 novel and 28 reported variations) were identified (Supplementary Fig. S4 and Supplementary Table S4). The functional impacts of all exonic variations were analyzed as previously mentioned (Supplementary Table S5) and the impact of exon-intron boundaries on mRNA splicing process was evaluated by using ESE finder 2.018. We found a variation in SCN10A (p.V1149M) associated with KSD in another family (UBRS094) (Fig. 1B), which was not present in the normal control subjects (n = 180). The clinical characteristics of KSD in the affected members of this family are shown in Supplementary Table S6.
mRNA and protein expression, immunohistochemistry, and double immunofluorescence staining in human kidney tissues
SCN10A mRNA and NaV1.8 α subunit protein in human kidney tissues were examined by RT-PCR and Western-blot analysis as shown in Fig. 3A,B, respectively. SCN10A mRNA was found to express in human kidney tissues and HEK293T cell line (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S5). The protein was observed in all 4 human kidney tissues (Fig. 3B). The NaV1.8 α subunit protein was then stained by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 3C) and double immunofluorescence methods (Fig. 3D). The protein was expressed at the proximal tubule and the collecting ducts of nephrons (Fig. 3C), and its expression at tubules of nephron co-localized with alpha 1 Na+/K+ ATPase, a membrane protein marker of the kidney tubules (Fig. 3D).
Quantitative analyses of wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells
HEK293-1B cells transfected with wild-type or mutant NaV1.8 construct were cultured for 48 hours. The expression of wide-type or mutant NaV1.8 α subunit protein was determined by Western-blot method and quantified by densitometric analysis. The levels of all mutant proteins significantly decreased when compared to that of the wild-type protein as analyzed by one-way ANOVA (Fig. 4A). There were no significant differences of the recombinant protein quantities between the N909K and K1809R mutants, whereas the recombinant protein from N909K/K1809R mutant showed a significant reduction when compared to those of the wild-type and the two individual mutants.
Stabilities of wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells
To examine stabilities of the wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells, newly synthesized protein were inhibited with cycloheximide – a protein synthesis inhibitor. The level of wild-type NaV1.8 α subunit was initially constant and then reduced by 50% after cycloheximide treatment for more than 12 hours (Fig. 4B). In contrast, the levels of mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins (N909K, K1809R, and N909K/K1809R) were more rapidly reduced than that of the wild-type NaV1.8 α subunit protein. The time leading to a 50% reduction for the mutant N909K protein was more than 6 hours and for the mutant K1809R and N909K/K1809R proteins were more than 10 hours. They seemed to have time-dependent reduction within 2–24 hours (Fig. 4B).
Electrophysiological properties of wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells
HEK293-1B cells were transfected to express wild-type or mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins and the electrophysiological properties of NaV1.8 currents were compared. Figure 4C shows representative currents, with average current density-voltage curves shown in Fig. 4D. Peak current densities at 0 mV were compared in Fig. 4E. The currents produced by mutant NaV1.8 p.I1706V (−38.66 ± 6.06 pA/pF, n = 12), serving as a positive control, had an average peak current density that did not differ from that of wild-type (−35.10 ± 3.44 pA/pF, n = 23). The average peak current densities of mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K (−26.12 ± 3.72, n = 22), p.K1809R (−25.96 ± 2.44, n = 24) and p.N909K/K1809R (−23.68 ± 2.46, n = 24) were significantly reduced, compared to that of the wild-type NaV1.8. The reversal potential was unaffected by all the mutations (Table 3), indicating a preservation of ionic selectivity.
Table 3.
NaV1.8 | Reversal potential | Activation (mV) | Steady-state fast inactivation | Slow inactivation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mV | n | V1/2 | k | n | V1/2 | k | n | V1/2 | k | n | |
Wild-type | 53.02 ± 1.61 | 23 | −5.97 ± 1.93 | 10.80 ± 1.00 | 23 | −49.14 ± 1.67 | 10.03 ± 1.07 | 23 | −58.23 ± 2.86 | 10.32 ± 0.62 | 12 |
I1706V | 49.39 ± 2.05 | 12 | −13.23 ± 2.54* | 7.51 ± 1.23* | 12 | −47.84 ± 2.02 | 10.03 ± 0.70 | 12 | −58.60 ± 4.06 | 11.34 ± 1.22 | 7 |
N909K | 49.84 ± 1.87 | 22 | −9.43 ± 2.09 | 8.43 ± 0.45 | 22 | −48.44 ± 1.42 | 10.25 ± 0.54 | 22 | −56.87 ± 1.57 | 10.20 ± 0.85 | 16 |
K1809R | 49.37 ± 1.63 | 24 | −4.51 ± 2.14 | 11.41 ± 1.15 | 24 | −50.72 ± 2.52 | 10.44 ± 0.53 | 22 | −58.47 ± 2.74 | 12.24 ± 0.54* | 11 |
N909K/K1809R | 48.29 ± 1.83 | 24 | −6.56 ± 2.37 | 10.77 ± 1.05 | 24 | −47.24 ± 2.02 | 10.44 ± 0.48 | 23 | −56.12 ± 2.36 | 11.75 ± 0.81 | 16 |
Mean ± S.E.M.; V1/2, half maximal activation or inactivation voltage; k, slope factor; *p < 0.05 versus wild-type channels (unpaired t-test).
The Boltzmann fit for activation, fast inactivation, and slow inactivation were derived for each individual cell and averaged (Table 3). The voltage dependence of activation is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S6 (G/Gmax, right curves of each panel). The activation midpoint (V1/2) of mutant NaV1.8 p.I1706V has significantly shifted to more hyperpolarized potentials with steepened slope factor (k) than wild-type (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S6A). On the other hand, the mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K, p.K1809R and p.N909K/ K1809R had no significant effect on activation or steady-state fast inactivation (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S6B–D). Mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K and p.N909K/K1809R had no significant effect on slow inactivation, but mutant NaV1.8 p.K1809R had a slight increased slope factor than the wild-type (Table 3).
We further investigated the kinetics of fast inactivation. Fitting the current decay phase with a monoexponential fit revealed that fast inactivation rates were similar between wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 proteins, except for the mutant NaV1.8 p.K1809R which had significantly increased time constant (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Table S7). At 0 mV, the average percentage of persistent current (caused by slow inactivation19) was significantly reduced in mutant NaV1.8 p.I1706V and p.N909K compared with wild-type (Supplementary Table S7), while that of mutant NaV1.8 p.K1809R and p.N909K/K1809R was not (Supplementary Table S7). Finally, we examined the rate of recovery from fast inactivation at −80 mV, using a two-pulse protocol (see the Methods), and found that among the wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 channels, there was no difference in recovery time constants of either slow or fast component (Supplementary Fig. S7 and Supplementary Table S8).
Discussion
The etiology of KSD in the NE Thai population is unknown; it is possibly different from what was reported in the Western and other populations because there are no hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria or hyperuricosuria observed in the affected persons in this population20. Previously, our group has demonstrated that genetic variations were associated with KSD risk in the NE Thai population by case-control studies. We found that genetic variation of a stone inhibitor protein (prothrombin, F2) was associated with KSD risk in the NE Thai female patients15,16 and later reported the association between a 3′ UTR variation of PAQR6 – a gene encoding progestin and adipoQ receptor family member VI, and KSD in the NE Thai patients21. However, these genetic variants were likely modifying, not disease-causing, variants because the minor alleles were observed in both the patient and control groups with different frequencies. In contrast with the other ethnic groups, the genes associated with hypercalciuria such as VDR, CLCNS, CLDN16, TRPV5 and KLOTHO22 were not detected in the NE Thai patients. We therefore set forth to identify a disease-casing gene in the NE Thai families with KSD by using linkage analysis and exome sequencing.
We initially identified three Max LOD regions in an index family affected with KSD by genome-wide linkage analysis and found two variations in SCN10A (p.N909K and p.K1809R) co-segregated with KSD in this family (Fig. 1A). Haplotype analysis in the chromosome 3 region, where the two variations (p.N909K and p.K1809R) and 49 SNPs in SCN10A located, showed co-segregation of one haplotype with KSD in this family (Supplementary Fig. S3). The two variations of SCN10A (p.N909K and p.K1809R) are thus in linkage disequilibrium and their effects to cause the disease may be combined. The combined amino-acid changes may exert a greater effect upon structural alteration of the protein. Combinations of two mutations on the same allele have previously been reported in other diseases inherited as autosomal dominant mode such as a missense (p.N543H) mutation and an in-frame 9-bp deletion (2393del9) of low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolaemia23 and missense mutations at p.V804M and p.Y806C of RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (MEN2B)24,25. Both studies showed that the combinations of two mutations on the same alleles could act together to increase effect on the protein function.
An additional variation of SCN10A (p.V1149M) identified was potentially associated with KSD in another affected family (Fig. 1B). The discovery of another variation of SCN10A (p.V1149M) associated with KSD in a different family strongly supports that this gene is involved in KSD. SCN10A encodes NaV1.8 α subunit of voltage-gated sodium channel (Fig. 1C). Amino-acid sequence alignment demonstrated that asparagine (N) 909, valine (V) 1149, and lysine (K) 1809 are highly conserved in the evolution of vertebrates (Fig. 1D), supporting their functional significance in the protein structure.
The affected members of the index family are males in majority while the affected members of the second family are mainly females. Since SCN10A locates on chromosome 3 which is an autosome, sex preference may not be involved in the disease association with the defect of this gene, and the sex bias in each family is likely occurred by chance. However, it is possible that other genetic factors for example the presence of F2 variations, which is a KSD modifying gene in the NE Thai population, may be involved in the gender and disease association in favor of the affected male majority.
The NaV1.8 α subunit of voltage-gated sodium channel encoded by SCN10A plays a key role in nociception – the neural processes of encoding and processing noxious stimuli to signal pain26. NaV1.8 α subunit is expressed in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and peripheral nerve axons27. Gain-of-function mutations of SCN10A cause painful peripheral neuropathy19,28,29. NaV1.8 α subunit is also expressed in heart tissue and genetic variation in SCN10A associated with prolonged cardiac conduction and Brugada syndrome30–32. However, these clinical phenotypes were not observed in the affected members of the studied families. The absence of a primary role for SCN10A mutations in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy was reported and it has previously been noted that despite a known role for the encoded protein in peripheral nerve function, the proband with the SCN10A mutation had no discernible neurological abnormalities33. Thus, it is likely that the affected family members with KSD associated with SCN10A mutations have neither neurological nor cardiac abnormalities.
The distinct disease phenotypes associated with SCN10A mutations may be explained by different types of amino acid changes and different interactions with other proteins in different cell types, i.e. neurons, cardiac cells or kidney cells. For examples, while gain-of-function mutations of SCN10A cause painful peripheral neuropathy, its loss-of-function mutations result in prolonged cardiac conduction disease and Brugada syndrome or KSD. The two latter diseases associated with loss-of-function mutations may subtly differ in locations, types, and effects of amino acid changes on the protein structure that cause abnormality in different cell types and organs. In the prolonged cardiac conduction disease and Brugada syndrome, the mutations seem to be more severe than that in KSD. It should be noted that in the northeastern part of Thailand not only KSD but also sudden unexplained nocturnal death syndrome (SUNDS) are prevalent. Since KSD and SUNDS are associated with channelopathies but the cause of SUNDS in the NE Thai population has not fully been elucidated, it is also interesting to investigate the causal relationship between SUNDS and other mutations of SCN10A.
SCN10A mRNA and NaV1.8 α subunit protein were present in human kidney tissues (Fig. 3A,B and Supplementary Fig. S5). Low level of SCN10A mRNA expression in human kidney has previously been demonstrated by quantitative RT-PCR34 but there was no report on the NaV1.8 α subunit protein expression in the human kidney. NaV1.8 α subunit protein expression in proximal tubules and collecting ducts of nephron in human kidney was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 3C,D). NaV1.8 was initially reported to be preferentially expressed in peripheral sensory neurons and absent from kidney tissues of rodents27. These data are not easily reconcilable with the genetic, biochemical and functional evidences presented in this study, describing the NaV1.8 expression in human kidney tissue and its contribution to kidney stone disease. One explanation is that the NaV1.8 expression in human kidney is different than in rodents. The level of NaV1.8 expression and its role in kidney cells might be investigated in more detail in future studies using induced pluripotent cells that could be differentiated into kidney cells in vitro35.
The biological properties of wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins (p.N909K, p.K1809R, and p.N909K/K1809R) were examined in HEK293-1B cells. In the quantitative Western-blot analysis, the relative fold changes of each individual mutant NaV1.8 α subunit protein (p.N909K or p.K1809R) and double mutant NaV1.8 α subunit protein (N909K/K1809R) were lower than that of the wild-type protein (Fig. 4A). These results suggested that the mutations affect the levels of NaV1.8 α subunit protein expression. To investigate their stabilities, we then inhibited the newly synthesized proteins by cycloheximide (Fig. 4B). All mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins were more rapidly decreased than that of the wild-type protein, although the levels of the two mutant proteins (p.N909K and p.K1809R) and that of the double mutant protein (p.N909K/K1809R) were not different, suggesting the instability of the mutant proteins attributable to amino acid changes.
The electrophysiological function showed that the current density of three mutations, NaV1.8 p.N909K, p.K1809R, and p.N909K/K1809R, were significantly smaller than that of the wild-type, without impairing the activation or inactivation kinetics. Moreover, both single and double substitutions resulted in similar current reduction and preservation of electrophysiological properties. Therefore, the substituted residues have affected NaV1.8 α subunit protein stability, as demonstrated and previously discussed, more than the voltage dependence or kinetic properties, causing reduced current density. Thus, loss-of-function in SCN10A mutation – the mechanism involving in KSD – is attributable to the stability of the double mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K/K1809R protein.
The affected members of the index family had KSD, which is likely to be calcium (oxalate) stone, whose risk factors include high sodium intake36, and high dietary calcium or oxalate37. High Na+ in the renal ultrafiltrate is known to reduce Ca2+ reabsorption and may increase the tendency for stone formation38. As found in this study, NaV1.8 channel is localized in proximal and collecting tubule epithelia. We therefore speculate that, physiologically, when Na+ load is high, causing depolarization in the renal tubular cells, NaV1.8 channel may be activated by the depolarization and help increase Na+ reabsorption. Thus, the loss-of-function of the mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K/K1809R may not allow sufficient Na+ reabsorption increase to match the increased Na+ load, resulting in high filtered Na+, causing decreased Ca2+ reabsorption and high urinary Ca2+. These cationic (Na+ and Ca2+) changes can be the initial risk factor of KSD caused by the loss-of-function mutations of SCN10A. Although these changes may not be large to alter urinary electrolytes, their effects can eventually cause observable KSD in the affected members of this family. The late-onset nature of KSD in this family, generally >25 years old, indicates the other factor, either genetic or environmental one, contributing to the pathogenesis of KSD. The additional genetic mutation at another allele occurred as somatic mutation (or second hit) in SCN10A or epigenetic alterations regulating SCN10A expression may be involved in the late-onset nature of the disease. This additional genetic mutation or epigenetic alterations may exert a greater reduction of NaV1.8 channel and larger cationic (Na+ and Ca2+) changes, increasing the risk of KSD. Alternatively, the known environmental factors, such as high Na+, Ca2+ or oxalate diet, or unknown environmental factors in combination with the loss-of-function mutations of SCN10A may contribute to the pathogenesis of KSD in this family. These additional factors are still unclear and required further studies.
Taken together, we discovered loss-of-function mutations of SCN10A, encoding NaV1.8 α subunit of voltage-gated sodium channel, in families with KSD. Two mutations (p.N909K and p.K1809R) in the same allele and one additional mutation (p.V1149M) of SCN10A co-segregated with KSD in two affected families. The mutant protein containing p.N909K/K1809R variations were unstable and reduced in the regulation of current density function of NaV1.8 channel. The loss-of-function of the mutant NaV1.8 p.N909K/K1809R channel may be associated with cationic (Na+ and Ca2+) imbalance by reduced Na+ reabsorption, resulting in high Na+ filtration and decreased Ca2+ reabsorption, which is the risk factor of KSD in the affected families.
Methods
Patients with kidney stone disease and normal control subjects
This study was approved by Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB) and Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. The written informed-consent was obtained from all subjects before the study. Two hundred and fifty-six patients with kidney stone disease (KSD) and their family members were recruited at Sappasithiprasong Hospital in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. The patients’ clinical and family data, blood and urine samples, and stones removed by surgery, were collected. All patients and subjects were investigated for kidney stones by radiography of kidneys, ureters, and bladder (plain KUB) and in some cases by additional ultrasonography.
The unrelated normal control subjects for this study (n = 180) were recruited from the local villagers who lived in the same geographical areas as those of the patients with KSD. All subjects were investigated by radiography (plain KUB), and confirmed with renal ultrasonography, which were found to be free from KSD, and similarly examined as that for the patients. Gender and age data of normal control subjects are shown in Supplementary Table S9.
Genetic analysis
Genome-wide linkage analysis, exome sequencing and data analysis were performed in a selected family (UBRS082) with a maximal ELOD of 3.31, containing 17 members [7 affected and 10 unaffected]. All DNA samples were sent to the Functional Genomics Shared Resource (Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA) for SNP genotyping. LOD scores were analyzed by easyLINKAGE software17. Two DNA samples of affected members (II:5 and II:6) and one unaffected member (II:7) were taken for exome sequencing at Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). Detailed methods are available in Supplementary methods.
Nucleotide sequences of the genes of interest were acquired from the GenBank database for designing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers (Supplementary Table S10). Exons were amplified using the specific primer-pairs (Supplementary Table S11), genotyped and screened in DNA samples of KSD patients and normal control subjects (see more details in Supplementary methods).
Gene expression in human kidney and transfected proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells
Total RNAs were extracted from human fresh frozen kidney tissues, human sperm, and HEK293T. SCN10A cDNA was examined by RT-PCR. The primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S12.
Western-blot analysis of proteins extracted from human kidney tissue, immunohistochemistry, double immunofluorescence staining, quantitative analyses and stabilities of wild-type and mutant NaV1.8 α subunit proteins expressed in HEK293-1B cells were examined as described in Supplementary methods.
Electrophysiology
Transfected cells, which had been in 200 µg/ml G418 and 1 mM lidocaine for 24 hours (48 hours after transfection), were plated onto poly-l-lysine-coated cover slips (1 × 105 cells per 35-mm Petri dish; lidocaine was still present), and left overnight (10–12 hours). Then, they were exposed to culture media without lidocaine for at least three hours before subjected to an electrophysiological experiment. The current density, activation, steady-state fast inactivation and slow inactivation were assessed as described in Supplementary methods.
Statistics
Data sets were collected from at least three independent experiments. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used for statistically significant differences between the means of two groups. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval
Written informed consent was obtained from all studied subjects. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, which were approved by Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB) (COA no. Si 392/2012 and COA no. Si 133/2015).
Data availability
All the molecular genetic and cellular data generated during this study are included in this manuscript and its supplementary files. Array data are provided in Supplementary File S2 and exome sequence variant data are available at the European Variations Archive (EVA), study accession PRJEB25656.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and their families for participation in this project, the staff members of the Department of Medicine, Sappasithiprasong Hospital for their helps in logistics and field studies, and the staff members of the Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University for their assistances in laboratory works. This work was financially supported by Mahidol University Grants, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Grant (R016034007) and Thailand Research Fund (TRF, IRG5980006). NR and PY are supported by Chalermphrakiat Grants, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. OP is supported by The TRF Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Scholarship.
Author Contributions
P.Y. coordinated the project, conceived and designed experiments. P.Y., C.N., O.P., N.S., S.Sa., M.J., K.R., and W.W. wrote the manuscript. C.N., O.P., K.R., S.Sa., M.J., N.S., and N.R. performed most of the experiments. P.Y., S.Sr., B.C., D.C., C.N., O.P., S.Sa., N.R., M.J., W.C., S.C., S.D., S.W., K.R., and N.S. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. S.D. and, S.W. assisted candidate validation and manuscript editing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Choochai Nettuwakul and Oranud Praditsap contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-28623-3.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Reviews in urology. 2010;12:e86–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gambaro G, et al. Genetics of hypercalciuria and calcium nephrolithiasis: from the rare monogenic to the common polygenic forms. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2004;44:963–986. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Asplin JR. Hyperoxaluric calcium nephrolithiasis. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2002;31:927–949. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(02)00030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E. Kidney stone disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005;115:2598–2608. doi: 10.1172/JCI26662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goldfarb DS, Fischer ME, Keich Y, Goldberg J. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney international. 2005;67:1053–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edvardsson VO, Palsson R, Indridason OS, Thorvaldsson S, Stefansson K. Familiality of kidney stone disease in Iceland. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 2009;43:420–424. doi: 10.3109/00365590903151479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao B, et al. Association of osteopontin gene haplotypes with nephrolithiasis. Kidney international. 2007;72:592–598. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu CC, et al. The impact of osteopontin promoter polymorphisms on the risk of calcium urolithiasis. Clinica chimica acta, the international journal of clinical chemistry. 2010;411:739–743. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen WC, Wu HC, Lu HF, Chen HY, Tsai FJ. Calcitonin receptor gene polymorphism: a possible genetic marker for patients with calcium oxalate stones. European urology. 2001;39:716–719. doi: 10.1159/000052532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mossetti G, et al. The relationship of 3′ vitamin D receptor haplotypes to urinary supersaturation of calcium oxalate salts and to age at onset and familial prevalence of nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:2259–2265. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bid HK, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Mittal RD. Association of vitamin D receptor-gene (FokI) polymorphism with calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Journal of endourology/Endourological Society. 2005;19:111–115. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vezzoli G, et al. R990G polymorphism of calcium-sensing receptor does produce a gain-of-function and predispose to primary hypercalciuria. Kidney international. 2007;71:1155–1162. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thorleifsson G, et al. Sequence variants in the CLDN14 gene associate with kidney stones and bone mineral density. Nature genetics. 2009;41:926–930. doi: 10.1038/ng.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sritippayawan S, et al. Evidence suggesting a genetic contribution to kidney stone in northeastern Thai population. Urological research. 2009;37:141–146. doi: 10.1007/s00240-009-0189-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rungroj N, et al. Prothrombin haplotype associated with kidney stone disease in Northeastern Thai patients. Urology. 2011;77(249):e217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rungroj N, et al. Association between human prothrombin variant (T165M) and kidney stone disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lindner TH, Hoffmann K. easyLINKAGE: a PERL script for easy and automated two-/multi-point linkage analyses. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:405–407. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cartegni L, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR. ESEfinder: A web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers. Nucleic acids research. 2003;31:3568–3571. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Faber CG, et al. Gain-of-function Nav1.8 mutations in painful neuropathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:19444–19449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216080109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sriboonlue P, et al. Blood and urinary aggregator and inhibitor composition in controls and renal-stone patients from northeastern Thailand. Nephron. 1991;59:591–596. doi: 10.1159/000186649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rungroj N, et al. A whole genome SNP genotyping by DNA microarray and candidate gene association study for kidney stone disease. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alelign T, Petros B. Kidney Stone Disease: An Update on Current Concepts. Adv Urol. 2018;2018:3068365. doi: 10.1155/2018/3068365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jensen HK, et al. Two mutations in the same low-density lipoprotein receptor allele act in synergy to reduce receptor function in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 1997;9:437–444. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:5<437::AID-HUMU10>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Menko FH, et al. Atypical MEN type 2B associated with two germline RET mutations on the same allele not involving codon 918. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:393–397. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.1.8136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miyauchi A, et al. Two germline missense mutations at codons 804 and 806 of the RET proto-oncogene in the same allele in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B without codon 918 mutation. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999;90:1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00658.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Akopian AN, et al. The tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel SNS has a specialized function in pain pathways. Nature neuroscience. 1999;2:541–548. doi: 10.1038/9195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akopian AN, Sivilotti L, Wood JN. A tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel expressed by sensory neurons. Nature. 1996;379:257–262. doi: 10.1038/379257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han, C. et al. The G1662S NaV1.8 mutation in small fibre neuropathy: impaired inactivation underlying DRG neuron hyperexcitability. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306095 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Garrison, S. R., Weyer, A. D., Barabas, M. E., Beutler, B. A. & Stucky, C. L. A gain-of-function voltage-gated sodium channel 1.8 mutation drives intense hyperexcitability of A- and C-fiber neurons. Pain, 10.1016/j.pain.2014.01.012 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Behr ER, et al. Role of common and rare variants in SCN10A: results from the Brugada syndrome QRS locus gene discovery collaborative study. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;106:520–529. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chambers JC, et al. Genetic variation in SCN10A influences cardiac conduction. Nature genetics. 2010;42:149–152. doi: 10.1038/ng.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hu D, et al. Mutations in SCN10A are responsible for a large fraction of cases of Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:66–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Te Riele AS, et al. Absence of a Primary Role for SCN10A Mutations in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016;9:87–89. doi: 10.1007/s12265-015-9670-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cejudo-Roman A, et al. The voltage-gated sodium channelnav1.8 is expressed in human sperm. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takasato M, et al. Directing human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards a renal lineage generates a self-organizing kidney. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:118–126. doi: 10.1038/ncb2894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Han H, Segal AM, Seifter JL, Dwyer JT. Nutritional Management of Kidney Stones (Nephrolithiasis) Clin Nutr Res. 2015;4:137–152. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2015.4.3.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Worcester EM, Coe FL. Nephrolithiasis. Prim Care. 2008;35:369–391, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yatabe MS, et al. Effects of a high-sodium diet on renal tubule Ca2+ transporter and claudin expression in Wistar-Kyoto rats. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the molecular genetic and cellular data generated during this study are included in this manuscript and its supplementary files. Array data are provided in Supplementary File S2 and exome sequence variant data are available at the European Variations Archive (EVA), study accession PRJEB25656.