Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-018-21572-x, published online 15 February 2018
This Article contains a typographical error in the Results and Discussion section where,
“This value is 213 times higher compared to graphitic powder (2.78 m2/g) 6, indicating that graphite was significantly exfoliated into few graphitic layers (2630/591 ≈ 4) by thermal exfoliation.”
should read:
“This value is 213 times higher compared to graphitic powder (2.78 m2/g)6, indicating that graphite was significantly exfoliated into few graphitic layers (2630/591 ≈ 4) by thermal exfoliation.”
In addition, this Article contains an error in the order of the Figures. Figures 2 and 3 were published as Figures 3 and 2 respectively. The correct Figures 2 and 3 appear below as Figures 1 and 2 respectively.
Contributor Information
H. N. Lim, Email: janetlimhn@gmail.com
S. M. Hafiz, Email: syedhafiz27@gmail.com
N. M. Huang, Email: huangnayming@xmu.edu.my