Abstract
Alternative pre-mRNA splicing (AS) produces multiple isoforms of mRNAs and proteins from a single gene. It is most prevalent in the mammalian brain and is thought to contribute to the formation and/or maintenance of functional complexity of the brain. Increasing evidence has documented the significant changes of AS between different regions or different developmental stages of the brain, however, the dynamics of AS and the possible function of it during neural progenitor cell (NPC) differentiation is less well known. Here, using purified NPCs and their progeny neurons isolated from the embryonic mouse cerebral cortex, we characterized the global differences of AS events between the 2 cell types by deep sequencing. The sequencing results revealed cell type-specific AS in NPCs and neurons that are important for distinct functions pertinent to the corresponding cell type. Our data may serve as a resource useful for further understanding how AS contributes to molecular regulations in NPCs and neurons during cortical development.
Keywords: alternative splicing, cerebral cortex, neural progenitor cells, neuronal differentiation, RNA-seq
Introduction
Alternative precursor-mRNA (pre-mRNA) splicing (AS) is a key regulation in mammalian gene expression, generating diverse mRNA and protein isoforms. AS is especially prevalent in the mammalian brain and is thought to contribute to the establishment and/or maintenance of functional complexity of the brain (Li et al. 2007; Zheng and Black 2013; Raj and Blencowe 2015; Vuong et al. 2016). Indeed, multiple transcriptome studies of mammalian brains have uncovered significant differences of AS amongst various brain domains (Johnson et al. 2009; Ayoub et al. 2011), cortical layers (Belgard et al. 2011), developmental stages (Dillman et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2015), or neuron and glia cell types (Zhang et al. 2014). In addition, misregulation of AS is linked to specific neurological diseases (Faustino and Cooper 2003; Licatalosi and Darnell 2006), further suggesting the importance of AS in the normal function of the brain. To better understand the biological importance of AS in brain development and function, data documenting the in vivo status of AS during temporal progression of cellular specifications and between distinct neuronal cell lineages are essential, however, such data are still limited due to the technical difficulties in obtaining purified neural progenitor cells (NPCs) or distinct neuronal cell types. In a recently study, AS was examined in a cellular specification model of the mouse cerebral cortex, based on an Eomes-GFP transgenic reporter-mediated isolation of NPC and neuron populations (Zhang et al. 2016). While the study identified many differentially spliced genes between the 2 cell populations, the possible inclusion of other types of cells within the isolated Eomes-GFP negative NPC population might limit identification of the full scope of differential AS events between NPCs and neurons during cortical neurogenesis. We previously designed a dual reporter strategy by labeling NPCs with GFP and differentiated daughter neurons with RFP in transgenic animals to enable effective simultaneous isolation of NPCs and neurons from the embryonic cortex (Wang et al. 2011; Hahn et al. 2013). Using this system, we investigated the dynamics of AS comparing purified NPCs and neurons. We present results revealing cell type-specific AS in NPCs and neurons and the potential functional implications in cortical neurogenesis.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Nestin-GFP and Dcx-mRFP transgenic reporter mice were previously described (Wang et al. 2011; Hahn et al. 2013). The Dcx-mRFP reporter line can be obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, C57BL/6J-Tg(Dcx-mRFP)15Qlu/J (Stock# 24905). Animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and were carried out in accordance with NIH guideline and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
FACS-Mediated Purification of Cortical NPCs and Neurons
Purification of E15.5 cortical cells using a double reporter strategy was done as previously described (Wang et al. 2011; Hahn et al. 2013). Briefly, heterozygous Nestin-GFP mice were bred with homozygous Dcx-mRFP mice to yield GFP/RFP double positive embryos. The cortices derived from the double positive embryos were dissociated by trituration in HBSS (Mediatech) with 5 mM of EDTA (Invitrogen) and 25 μg/mL of DNase I (Roche). Cells were washed once using HBSS with 12.5 μg/mL of DNase I and resuspended in DMEM/F12 (Mediatech) with 12.5 μg/mL of DNase I and 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich). FACS was performed with a 4-laser BD FACSAria™ III System (BD Biosciences). Cell debris and doublets were excluded with gating of forward scatter, side scatter and pulse width. Sorted cells were collected into DMEM/F12 with 5% BSA.
RNA-seq
NPCs and neurons purified from E15.5 cortical cells were accumulated in duplicate samples, and total RNAs were isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA-seq was done by the Integrative Genomics Core at City of Hope. Paired End libraries were prepared, size selected, gel purified and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2000 system following the manufacturer's protocols (Illumina).
RNA-seq Data Analysis
The paired-end reads were aligned to mm9 genome assembly using Tophat v2 with default settings. In total, 37–40 millions of reads were sequenced with all samples. In one sample of NPCs, out of 39 006 345 aligned reads, 73.6% were mapped to exon region of RefSeq genes and there are 319 183 reads spanning exon junctions. In one sample of neurons, 73.3% of 37 748 810 aligned reads were aligned to exon regions, and 324 689 reads spanning exon junctions. The alternative splicing (AS) events were identified using MATS v3.0.8 with default settings. AS events with false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 and the absolute value of inclusion level difference (|IncLevelDifference|) ≥ 0.1 were considered significant.
Results
We isolated NPCs and neurons from the embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) cortices of the Nestin-GFP/Dcx-mRFP reporter mice (Fig. 1A and B). Total RNA from duplicate cell samples were extracted and pair-end deep RNA sequencing was performed. Analyses of the sequencing data confirmed specific expression of NPC markers and neuron markers in the respective cell population (Fig. 1C), consistent with our previous transcriptome study of purified NPCs and neurons by microarray (Wang et al. 2011). In addition, the data showed that the sequenced reads were mostly mapped to exons and that duplicate samples were highly consistent (Fig. 1D and E).
Figure 1.
RNA-seq of purified neural progenitor cells (NPC) and neurons. (A) Images of brain sections from the double reporter transgenic mouse showing labeling of NPCs with Nestin-EGFP and neurons with Dcx-mRFP. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Fluorescence-activate cell sorting (FACS) profile of dissociated cortical cells derived from the E15.5 Nestin-EGFP/Dcx-mRFP embryos. Neural progenitor cells were GFP+RFP− cells. Daughter neurons were double positive due to carryover of GFP from NPCs. (C) Heatmap showing mRNA expression of NPC and neuron markers in each sample. NPC-1, -2 and Neuron-1, -2 represent duplicate samples for NPCs and neurons, respectively. (D and E) Representative marker gene tracks for NPCs (D) and neurons (E). The numbers in the square brackets represent data ranges. Gene modes are shown below with arrows as transcription start sites (TSSs). Scale bar: 1 kb.
To identify differential AS between NPCs and neurons, we applied multivariate analysis of transcript splicing (MATS) to the sequencing data. By setting the FDR ≤ 0.05 and the absolute value of inclusion level difference (|IncLevelDifference|) ≥ 0.1, we identified 84 and 176 differential skipped exons (SE) from NPCs and neurons, respectively (Fig. 2A). Table 1 listed the NPC-specific skipped exon events. We also identified other types of splicing forms, such as retained intron (RI), alternative 5′ splice site (A5SS), alternative 3′ splice site (A3SS) and mutually exclusive exons (MXE). These differential splicing events were summarized in Figure 2A and detailed information of genes/events was included in the Supplementary Table S1. Figure 2B–D illustrated several examples of genes showing differential AS between NPCs and neurons. Dst and Map3k7 have one exon (green rectangular box) expressing higher in NPCs while relatively low in neurons (Fig. 2B), indicating this exon was mostly skipped in neurons comparing with NPCs. An exon in St7 and Dtnb (red rectangular box) was mainly present in neurons but was skipped in NPCs (Fig. 2C). In all cases, other adjacent exons were expressed at similar levels in both cell types. Ablim1 was identified as SE both in NPC and in neuron groups. The Ablim1 gene track showed one exon (green rectangular box) highly expressed in NPCs and one nearby exon (red rectangular box) primarily expressed in neurons (Fig. 2D). These results suggested that the identified AS events reflected differential exon expression levels between NPCs and neurons based on the sequencing data.
Figure 2.
Alternative splicing events identified in NPCs and neurons. (A) Summary of alternative splicing events in NPCs and neurons. Numbers stand for cases of each event and percentages in brackets represent the percentage found of each event in that cell type. Black filled boxes represent constitutive exons, while empty boxes represent alternative exons. Blue and red lines represent splice junctions. FDR, false discovery rate. |IncLevelDifference|: absolute value of inclusion level difference. (B–D) Representative gene tracks for differential AS events specifically occurred in NPCs (B), neurons (C), or both cell types (D). Green rectangular boxes show NPC-specific events and red rectangular boxes indicate neuron-specific events. The numbers in the square brackets represent data ranges. The numbers on the top of tracks demonstrate the chromosomal locations of gene regions. Partial modes of genes are shown below with arrows indicate transcription directions.
Table 1.
Neural progenitor cell-specific skipped exon (SE) events. The events were selected by FDR ≤ 0.05 and IncLevelDifference ≥ 0.1
| Gene symbol | Chr | Strand | Exon starta | Exon end | FDR | IncLevelDifference | Gene symbol | Chr | Strand | Exon starta | Exon end | FDR | IncLevelDifference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macf1 | chr4 | − | 123 074 336 | 123 074 663 | 7.01E-08 | 0.641 | Rif1 | chr2 | + | 51 929 766 | 51 929 845 | 0.013097774 | 0.281 |
| Dennd5a | chr7 | − | 117 078 995 | 117 079 067 | 5.85E-05 | 0.634 | Mark3 | chr12 | + | 112 890 168 | 112 890 195 | 0.000210272 | 0.277 |
| L3mbtl3 | chr10 | − | 26 063 982 | 26 064 057 | 7.12E-07 | 0.588 | Bnip2 | chr9 | + | 69 852 112 | 69 852 148 | 3.57E-08 | 0.275 |
| Phf21a | chr2 | + | 92 191 988 | 92 192 021 | 1.40E-07 | 0.585 | 4833439L19Rik | chr13 | − | 54 665 870 | 54 665 982 | 5.93E-06 | 0.273 |
| Sema6c | chr3 | + | 94 975 712 | 94 975 808 | 0.033364772 | 0.575 | Bag6 | chr17 | + | 35 279 442 | 35 279 550 | 3.13E-05 | 0.273 |
| Fbxw7 | chr3 | + | 84 668 058 | 84 668 122 | 0.030606885 | 0.572 | Map4 | chr9 | + | 109 983 924 | 109 984 114 | 0.015760831 | 0.266 |
| Dnajb4 | chr3 | − | 151 856 340 | 151 856 582 | 0.000531728 | 0.526 | Cadm1 | chr9 | + | 47 626 816 | 47 626 900 | 0.000318885 | 0.264 |
| Ptprs | chr17 | − | 56 568 521 | 56 568 580 | 3.71E-11 | 0.518 | Smarce1 | chr11 | − | 99 086 034 | 99 086 456 | 0.041041541 | 0.254 |
| Ap1ar | chr3 | − | 127 518 513 | 127 518 612 | 0 | 0.517 | 4833439L19Rik | chr13 | − | 54 665 875 | 54 665 982 | 3.15E-06 | 0.253 |
| Lmo7 | chr14 | + | 102 330 388 | 102 330 497 | 4.13E-06 | 0.496 | Spag9 | chr11 | + | 93 974 576 | 93 974 615 | 0.000185435 | 0.249 |
| Tpm3 | chr3 | + | 89 894 934 | 89 895 013 | 0.005602015 | 0.488 | Pex2 | chr3 | − | 5 562 668 | 5 562 732 | 2.69E-06 | 0.244 |
| Ablim1 | chr19 | − | 57 121 414 | 57 121 561 | 0.032365799 | 0.481 | Dtwd1 | chr2 | + | 125 984 145 | 125 984 289 | 0.010579952 | 0.244 |
| Gphn | chr12 | + | 79 594 936 | 79 595 044 | 1.74E-07 | 0.48 | Gatad2a | chr8 | − | 72 436 062 | 72 436 137 | 0.046675106 | 0.235 |
| Prepl | chr17 | − | 85 487 679 | 85 488 215 | 0.001299817 | 0.475 | Zfp942 | chr17 | − | 22 078 692 | 22 078 817 | 0.028913391 | 0.233 |
| Erc1 | chr6 | − | 119 663 697 | 119 663 829 | 0.013567908 | 0.473 | Atxn2 | chr5 | + | 122 263 393 | 122 263 562 | 0.01290303 | 0.231 |
| Ablim1 | chr19 | − | 57 121 414 | 57 121 555 | 0.023845043 | 0.47 | Mpzl1 | chr1 | − | 167 531 880 | 167 531 986 | 0 | 0.23 |
| Tmem176b | chr6 | − | 48 790 359 | 48 790 452 | 0.033717499 | 0.452 | Usp14 | chr18 | − | 10 017 988 | 10 018 093 | 0.009657061 | 0.224 |
| Tmem63b | chr17 | − | 45 815 911 | 45 815 950 | 0.004671748 | 0.436 | Eif4a2 | chr16 | + | 23 112 423 | 23 112 530 | 0 | 0.223 |
| Agfg1 | chr1 | + | 82 876 582 | 82 876 702 | 6.77E-14 | 0.43 | Prpf40a | chr2 | − | 53 018 296 | 53 018 350 | 8.14E-07 | 0.219 |
| Myo5a | chr9 | + | 75 040 190 | 75 040 271 | 1.05E-06 | 0.429 | Tecr | chr8 | − | 86 097 309 | 86 097 354 | 2.88E-12 | 0.213 |
| Clip1 | chr5 | − | 124077302 | 124077419 | 1.85E-05 | 0.429 | App | chr16 | − | 85043820 | 85043988 | 8.19E-08 | 0.211 |
| Map3k7 | chr4 | + | 32 081 848 | 32 081 929 | 0.000449105 | 0.429 | Lrrc49 | chr9 | − | 60 528 311 | 60 528 509 | 0.029106763 | 0.209 |
| Prepl | chr17 | − | 85 487 679 | 85 487 779 | 0.00797855 | 0.427 | Dlgap4 | chr2 | + | 156 573 758 | 156 574 156 | 2.23E-07 | 0.207 |
| Immt | chr6 | + | 71 802 759 | 71 802 861 | 0.015399879 | 0.427 | Zc3h14 | chr12 | + | 100 018 257 | 100 018 490 | 8.20E-05 | 0.206 |
| Dst | chr1 | + | 34 360 265 | 34 360 376 | 1.24E-09 | 0.425 | Ktn1 | chr14 | + | 48 324 094 | 48 324 163 | 0.002490497 | 0.198 |
| Ubn1 | chr16 | + | 5 081 986 | 5 082 076 | 0.04928753 | 0.421 | Mtmr2 | chr9 | + | 13 564 861 | 13 564 932 | 0.010953235 | 0.188 |
| Sec16a | chr2 | − | 26 269 198 | 26 269 258 | 0.049598034 | 0.407 | 4833439L19Rik | chr13 | − | 54 665 545 | 54 665 633 | 9.16E-06 | 0.177 |
| Ptprz1 | chr6 | + | 22 974 713 | 22 974 734 | 0.001036352 | 0.397 | Chtop | chr3 | − | 90 306 037 | 90 306 175 | 5.03E-06 | 0.16 |
| Slmap | chr14 | − | 27 235 688 | 27 235 778 | 0.00226506 | 0.392 | Ttc14 | chr3 | + | 33 702 371 | 33 702 527 | 0.04928753 | 0.157 |
| Fgfr1op2 | chr6 | + | 146 541 155 | 146 541 269 | 1.45E-05 | 0.385 | Gpm6b | chrX | + | 162 823 322 | 162 823 413 | 0 | 0.156 |
| Atxn2 | chr5 | + | 122 231 341 | 122 231 551 | 0.002076189 | 0.371 | Dlgap4 | chr2 | + | 156 574 067 | 156 574 156 | 1.59E-09 | 0.146 |
| Cyfip1 | chr7 | + | 63 153 607 | 63 153 761 | 4.45E-07 | 0.365 | Hp1bp3 | chr4 | + | 137 777 440 | 137 777 638 | 0.00842253 | 0.142 |
| Pbrm1 | chr14 | + | 31 927 034 | 31 927 190 | 8.14E-07 | 0.362 | Arfrp1 | chr2 | − | 181 095 705 | 181 095 776 | 0.027669211 | 0.142 |
| Akap9 | chr5 | + | 3 954 396 | 3 954 450 | 0 | 0.356 | Pbrm1 | chr14 | + | 31 927 034 | 31 927 190 | 0.04376854 | 0.141 |
| Pbrm1 | chr14 | + | 31 923 600 | 31 923 765 | 0.011081276 | 0.349 | Atp6v1h | chr1 | + | 5 091 150 | 5 091 204 | 0.000467451 | 0.132 |
| Trp53bp1 | chr2 | − | 121 054 323 | 121 054 443 | 0.000389815 | 0.329 | Lrrfip1 | chr1 | + | 92 999 823 | 92 999 895 | 0.014187386 | 0.131 |
| Sgce | chr6 | − | 4 640 468 | 4 640 495 | 0.008825813 | 0.329 | Erc1 | chr6 | − | 119 728 005 | 119 728 089 | 0.000393889 | 0.129 |
| Bptf | chr11 | − | 106 956 315 | 106 956 504 | 0.00961622 | 0.322 | Pja2 | chr17 | − | 64 647 064 | 64 647 250 | 0.008826884 | 0.128 |
| Trim33 | chr3 | + | 103 157 489 | 103 157 540 | 0.023808039 | 0.309 | Zdhhc6 | chr19 | − | 55 377 047 | 55 377 094 | 0.000185435 | 0.117 |
| Eml4 | chr17 | + | 83 824 597 | 83 824 771 | 3.66E-06 | 0.3 | Hpf1 | chr8 | + | 63 374 257 | 63 374 447 | 0.003325292 | 0.116 |
| Pitpnb | chr5 | + | 111 814 539 | 111 814 624 | 2.12E-08 | 0.286 | Map3k7 | chr4 | + | 32 081 848 | 32 081 985 | 0.006226153 | 0.107 |
| Banp | chr8 | + | 124 544 418 | 124 544 544 | 0.046858838 | 0.282 | Tia1 | chr6 | + | 86 373 599 | 86 373 665 | 0.022490662 | 0.1 |
aExon start count from 0 base
Note: Chr, chromosome; FDR, false discovery rate; IncLevelDifference, inclusion level difference.
To further validate the identified AS events, we performed reverse transcription-coupled polymerase chains reaction (RT-PCR). We selected 18 NPC-specific SE genes, 16 neuron-specific SE genes, as well as 3 genes showing SE events in both cell types. PCR primers spanning the skipped exons were specifically designed (Supplementary Table S2). Total RNAs were extracted from newly purified E15.5 NPCs and neurons in duplicates. RNAs from total cortical cells derived from the E15.5 cortices without FACS sorting were used as control. Samples with the same amount of total RNA were then used for reverse transcription. The results showed that 18 NPC-specific SE genes all had the upper PCR bands (sequence including the alternatively used exon by NPCs) either being detected specifically in NPC samples or showing relatively higher ratios in NPCs comparing to neurons (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, 16 neuron-specific SE genes showed a reverse pattern: the upper PCR bands (sequence including the alternatively used exon by neurons) either expressed specifically in neurons or had higher ratios in neurons comparing to NPCs (Fig. 3B). The 3 genes having SE events in both cell types showed opposite patterns in NPCs and in neurons (Fig. 3C). All together, these RT-PCR results were consistent with the differential AS events between NPCs and neurons identified from deep sequencing.
Figure 3.
Validation of the AS events in E15.5 NPCs and neurons by RT-PCR. (A) 18 NPC-specific SE events were tested. All showed the upper PCR bands (sequence including the alternatively used exon by NPCs) either being detected specifically in NPC samples or showing relatively higher ratios in NPCs comparing to neurons. Total-1, -2 were unsorted duplicate samples of total cortical cells derived from the E15.5 cortices. (B) 16 neuron-specific SE events were tested. In all genes, the upper PCR bands (sequence including the alternatively used exon by neurons) either expressed specifically in neurons or had higher ratios in neurons comparing to NPCs. (C) The 3 genes having SE events in both cell types showed opposite patterns of the 2 differentially used exons in NPCs and in neurons.
To gain insights into the potential functions of the differential AS events, we performed DAVID bioinformatics analyses (DAVID 6.8). Gene ontology analyses showed that the top biological processes in neuron-specific AS were microtubule cytoskeleton organization, cell migration and nervous system development (Fig. 4A and B; Supplementary Table S3), functions important for morphogenesis and migration. The top biological processes in NPC-specific AS were retrograde transport (protein transport from endosome to Golgi), covalent chromatin modification and nervous system development (Fig. 4A and B; Supplementary Table S3), functions crucial for recycling of membrane proteins or gene expression regulation. KEGG pathway analyses showed that ErbB signaling pathway (P-value: 0.0051) was at the top in neuron-specific AS events (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Table S3). Within NPC-specific AS events, adherens junction pathway (P-value: 0.0015) was the main pathway highlighted (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 4.
Gene ontology of NPC- or neuron-specific SE events. (A) Top biological processes in NPC-specific (green bars, P < 0.01) and neuron-specific (red bars, P < 0.001) SE events. The numbers in brackets represent gene counts. (B) The genes included in each biological process (A) are listed. (C) KEGG pathways and genes in NPC-specific and neuron-specific SE events.
Discussions
Using purified NPCs and progeny neurons from the embryonic mouse cortices, we examined the dynamics changes of AS between NPCs and neurons by deep sequencing. Our RNA-seq data uncovered over 200 differential AS events between the 2 cell types, with skipped exons (SE) the major form of AS event occurring in cortical neurogenesis. RT-PCR using RNAs isolated from purified NPCs and neurons further validated the specific AS events suggested by the sequencing results, providing a foundation for further study of the potential mechanism and function of these differential AS events in neurogenesis. Gene ontology analyses revealed some clues on what might be the function of these identified AS events. Among neuron-specific AS events, genes involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization and cell migration were the most prominent. This suggested that neuron-specific AS might be involved in neuronal morphogenesis including neurite outgrowth, dendritogenesis, or synapse formation/plasticity. The top emergence of the ErbB pathway among neuron-specific AS appeared to be consistent with this thought. ErbB signaling pathway has been implicated in regulating the assembly of neural circuitry, myelination, neurotransmission, and synaptic plasticity (Mei and Nave 2014). Among NPC-specific AS events, genes involved in retrograde endosome to Golgi transport and covalent chromatin modification were the most prevalent. This indicated that NPC-specific AS might be involved in certain important functions of NPCs. Retrograde transport from endosome to Golgi regulates recycling of membrane proteins, which might be important for maintaining a proper proliferating state of NPCs, as cycling cells would require disassembly and reassembly of membrane proteins during cell divisions. Chromatin remodeling can impact gene expression and cell fate maintenance and has been implicated with important functions during neural progenitor development (Lomvardas and Maniatis 2016). The observation of adherens junction pathway as the top pathway in NPC-specific AS seemed to also agree with the idea. Proteins associated with adherens junctions are documented to regulate NPC functions in the developing cerebral cortex (Rasin et al. 2007; Lehtinen and Walsh 2011). While the specific functions and mechanisms of regulation of the characterized individual neuron- or NPC-specific AS events require further investigation, our data collectively indicated that the cell type-specific AS events in NPCs or neurons are functionally important for the corresponding cell type.
Using a Tbr2-EGFP transgenic reporter mouse strain, Zhang et al. (2016) recently isolated EGFP- (designated as NPCs) and EGFP+ (designated as neurons) cells from the E14.5 mouse cerebral cortex and analyzed differential AS events between these 2 cell groups. A partial list of the identified AS events (63 genes/events) was presented in Zhang's study (Zhang et al. 2016), among which 26 events overlapped with our dataset (data not shown). Within the group of AS events (33 genes/events) that was validated by RT-PCR in Zhang's study, 16/33 events were found in our dataset (Supplementary Fig. S1). These partial overlaps of the differential AS events may be attributed to different populations of cells employed in RNA-seq, or different algorithms used for data analyses, or both. In Zhang's study, Tbr2-EGFP negative cells contained radial glial cells (RGCs, the primary progenitor cells of the cortex) as well as interneurons (Liu et al. 2016) and likely other cell types, while Tbr2-EGFP-expressing cells included projection neurons and intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs). In this study, the Nestin-GFP/Dcx-mRFP dual reporter system provided co-isolation of NPCs (GFP+RFP− cells) and projection neurons (GFP+RFP+ cells), the former population contained both RGCs and IPCs. In summary, this study presented a systematic characterization of differential AS events between endogenous NPCs and their neuronal progeny. The data presented here may serve as a resource useful for further understanding how AS contributes to molecular regulations in NPCs and neurons during brain development.
Accession Number
Paired-end RNA-seq data of NPCs and neurons can be accessed at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession number GSE96950.
Supplementary Material
Notes
We thank Donna Isbell and Cirila Arteaga for assistance with animal breeding and care; Lucy Brown and Jeremy Stark and their staff for helping with cell sorting; Jinhui Wang for performing next-generation sequencing; Sika Zheng for critical reading of the article. Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material is available at Cerebral Cortex online.
Funding
National Institute of Health (grants NS075393 from NINDS to Q.L.). In addition, research reported in this study included work performed in the Analytical Cytometry Core and Integrated Genomics Core supported by the National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA033572.
References
- Ayoub AE, Oh S, Xie Y, Leng J, Cotney J, Dominguez MH, Noonan JP, Rakic P. 2011. Transcriptional programs in transient embryonic zones of the cerebral cortex defined by high-resolution mRNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:14950–14955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belgard TG, Marques AC, Oliver PL, Abaan HO, Sirey TM, Hoerder-Suabedissen A, Garcia-Moreno F, Molnar Z, Margulies EH, Ponting CP. 2011. A transcriptomic atlas of mouse neocortical layers. Neuron. 71:605–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dillman AA, Hauser DN, Gibbs JR, Nalls MA, McCoy MK, Rudenko IN, Galter D, Cookson MR. 2013. mRNA expression, splicing and editing in the embryonic and adult mouse cerebral cortex. Nat Neurosci. 16:499–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faustino NA, Cooper TA. 2003. Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease. Genes Dev. 17:419–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn MA, Qiu R, Wu X, Li AX, Zhang H, Wang J, Jui J, Jin SG, Jiang Y, Pfeifer GP, et al. 2013. Dynamics of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and chromatin marks in mammalian neurogenesis. Cell Rep. 3:291–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson MB, Kawasawa YI, Mason CE, Krsnik Z, Coppola G, Bogdanovic D, Geschwind DH, Mane SM, State MW, Sestan N. 2009. Functional and evolutionary insights into human brain development through global transcriptome analysis. Neuron. 62:494–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehtinen MK, Walsh CA. 2011. Neurogenesis at the brain-cerebrospinal fluid interface. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 27:653–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q, Lee JA, Black DL. 2007. Neuronal regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Nat Rev. 8:819–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Licatalosi DD, Darnell RB. 2006. Splicing regulation in neurologic disease. Neuron. 52:93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J, Wu X, Zhang H, Qiu R, Yoshikawa K, Lu Q. 2016. Prospective separation and transcriptome analyses of cortical projection neurons and interneurons based on lineage tracing by Tbr2 (Eomes)-GFP/Dcx-mRFP reporters. Dev Neurobiol. 76:587–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomvardas S, Maniatis T. 2016. Histone and DNA modifications as regulators of neuronal development and function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 8(7):pii:a024208. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a024208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mei L, Nave KA. 2014. Neuregulin-ERBB signaling in the nervous system and neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuron. 83:27–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raj B, Blencowe BJ. 2015. Alternative splicing in the mammalian nervous system: recent insights into mechanisms and functional roles. Neuron. 87:14–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasin MR, Gazula VR, Breunig JJ, Kwan KY, Johnson MB, Liu-Chen S, Li HS, Jan LY, Jan YN, Rakic P, et al. 2007. Numb and Numbl are required for maintenance of cadherin-based adhesion and polarity of neural progenitors. Nat Neurosci. 10:819–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vuong CK, Black DL, Zheng S. 2016. The neurogenetics of alternative splicing. Nat Rev. 17:265–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Zhang H, Young AG, Qiu R, Argalian S, Li X, Wu X, Lemke G, Lu Q. 2011. Transcriptome analysis of neural progenitor cells by a genetic dual reporter strategy. Stem Cells. 29:1589–1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan Q, Weyn-Vanhentenryck SM, Wu J, Sloan SA, Zhang Y, Chen K, Wu JQ, Barres BA, Zhang C. 2015. Systematic discovery of regulated and conserved alternative exons in the mammalian brain reveals NMD modulating chromatin regulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:3445–3450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X, Chen MH, Wu X, Kodani A, Fan J, Doan R, Ozawa M, Ma J, Yoshida N, Reiter JF, et al. 2016. Cell-type-specific alternative splicing governs cell fate in the developing cerebral cortex. Cell. 166:1147–1162 e1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, Bennett ML, Scholze AR, O’Keeffe S, Phatnani HP, Guarnieri P, Caneda C, Ruderisch N, et al. 2014. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 34:11929–11947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng S, Black DL. 2013. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing in neurons: growing up and extending its reach. Trends Genet. 29:442–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




