Skip to main content
Gene Expression logoLink to Gene Expression
. 2018 Jul 12;14(1):35–46. doi: 10.3727/000000007783991772

Gene Expression Variability in Subcutaneous and Omental Adipose Tissue of Obese Men

Yonghua Zhang *, Yohan Bossé , Picard Marceau §, Simon Biron §, Stephan Lebel §, Denis Richard , Marie-Claude Vohl *,, André Tchernof *,
PMCID: PMC6042019  PMID: 17933217

Abstract

We investigated interindividual variability in gene expression in abdominal subcutaneous (SC) and omental (OM) adipose tissue of 10 massively obese men. Affymetrix human U133A microarrays were used to measure gene expression levels. A total of 6811 probesets generated significant signal in both depots in all samples. Interindividual variability in gene expression was rather low, with more than 90% of transcripts showing a coefficient of variation (CV) lower than 23.6% and 21.7% in OM and SC adipose tissues, respectively. The distributions of CV were similar between the two fat depots. A set of highly variable genes was identified for both tissues on the basis of a high CV and elevated gene expression level. Among the set of highly regulated genes, 18 transcripts were involved in lipid metabolism and 28 transcripts were involved in cell death for SC and OM samples, respectively. In conclusion, gene expression interindividual variability was rather low and globally similar between fat compartments, and the adipose tissue transcriptome appeared as relatively stable, although specific pathways were found to be highly variable in SC and OM depots.

Key words: Adipose tissue, Omental, Subcutaneous, Microarrays, Obese men

INTRODUCTION

A higher risk of obesity-related metabolic diseases has been associated with increased adipose tissue mass in the abdominal region (5,24). Using imaging methods, studies have shown that abdominal, and especially visceral or intra-abdominal obesity, in both men and women, is closely associated with a dyslipidemic state that includes hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, elevated apolipoprotein B, a greater proportion of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, and increased LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio (6). This condition is also associated with hyper-insulinemia and insulin resistance (7,24).

Adipose tissue located within the abdominal cavity has been suggested to be functionally and metabolically distinct from that of the subcutaneous compartment (15,23) and a number of differentially expressed genes encoding important functional properties may underlie abdominal obesity-related disorders (23). Many studies have now used microarray profiling of adipose tissue to investigate gene expression in obesity (2–4,16). Analysis of variability in gene expression has been used to examine specific genes that could be related to adipose tissue function. However, so far only animal data are available (2,3), and no large-scale genomic study has been performed to examine the variability of gene expression in human adipose tissue. In this study, we investigated the interindividual variability in gene expression in abdominal subcutaneous (SC) and omental (OM) adipose tissue samples from 10 nondiabetic, normolipidemic obese men, using previously established microarrays (23).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patient Selection

The study group included 10 massively obese men undergoing biliopancreatic diversion at the Laval Hospital (Quebec City). This surgical procedure involves bypassing the small intestine and diverting the bile and pancreatic juice to the distal ileum, which produces maldigestion and selective malabsorption essentially for fat and starch (17). Following clinical examination, none of the patients had identified chronic diseases such as cardiomyopathy and endocrine disorders. Body weight was stable at the time of study and no subject had been on a diet or involved in a weight reduction program in the last 6 months. All patients provided informed written consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Adipose tissue samples were obtained at the beginning of the surgery from the abdominal subcutaneous wall (close to the umbilicus) and from the greater omentum. Body weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences were measured according to standardized procedures.

RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription, and Probe Preparation

Adipose tissue samples were homogenized in Trizol reagent and centrifuged to separate the lipid fraction. Total RNA was prepared from the cleared homogenate according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA was repurified using RNEasy mini columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA integrity was verified using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Probes for microarray experiments were prepared using 10 μg of total RNA and hybridized overnight to Affymetrix HG-U133A Gene Chips (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Nonspecifically bound probe was removed by washing using the Agilent GeneChip Fluidics Station 400. Detection of specifically bound probes was performed by incubating the arrays with a biotinylated anti-streptavidin antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) prior to staining with SAPE (streptavidin phycoerthryin; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Detailed protocols for probe synthesis and hybridization reactions have been previously described (20). Real-time RT-PCR was used for confirmation with a subset of genes (23).

Array Data Extraction and Analysis

The arrays were scanned using an Agilent Gene Array Scanner and raw data were extracted from scanned images and scaled to 1000 units mean intensity using Microarray Analysis D-Chip software (PM-MM model). A significant signal was considered when the DChip software indicated a “present” call based on the modified algorithm of Microarray Suite analysis software 4 (Affymetrix). Interindividual variance in mean expression level and coefficient of variation (CV) calculations were performed for each transcript from the normalized signal obtained in both fat depots of all 10 subjects of the study (one array per fat sample, for a total of 20 arrays). Nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficients were computed to quantify associations between variance and mean expression levels or CV and mean expression levels in SC and OM fat samples either combined or separately. Log-10 transformation for all variables was used to normalize values. SC and OM variances or CVs were compared among fat depots by paired t-test. The selection of the most variable genes in SC and OM fat samples was based on the following criteria: 1) probesets that generated significant signal (“present” call) in both depots in all 10 subjects (n = 6811); 2) probesets that were in the top 2 percentile of CV for each depot (n = 136 for SC and OM); and 3) probesets that generated a mean expression level that was in the upper tertile (n = 68 in each depot). In addition, we examined variability in the probesets that generated significant signal (“present” call) in at least one and up to nine individuals.

Biological Pathway Analyses

Cellular pathways related to these transcripts were identified using the Kegg database (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/) and genecards (http://www.genecards.org/). The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis System (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) was also used to visualize gene expression data in the context of biological pathways. Two input files were uploaded in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis system considering: 1) probesets highly variable in SC tissues (n = 68) and 2) probesets highly variable in OM tissues (n = 68). Analyses were performed on both files individually, and a comparison analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Men of the study were 17.0 to 45.0 years old and were in the morbid obesity range with BMI values ranging from 44.7 to 80.7 kg/m2. They were characterized by a normal lipid profile, and were slightly hypertensive (9). Of the 22,283 probesets present on the array, significant signal (“present” call) was obtained for 6,811 probesets in both fat compartments of all 10 subjects. A total of 9,076 and 8,590 probesets generated significant signal (“present” call) in at least one and up to nine individuals in OM and SC samples, respectively.

Figure 1 shows the correlations between gene expression variance or CV (% variance) and mean gene expression levels for all 6,811 positive signals, regardless of the fat depot (Fig. 1A), in the OM (Fig. 1B) or SC (Fig. 1C) fat compartments. As expected, highly expressed genes had higher absolute variance in their expression levels as reflected by a positive correlation between mean transcript expression levels and absolute gene expression variance. However, mean gene expression levels were negatively correlated with CV, indicating slightly higher variability at low expression levels. The distribution of CV in gene expression in OM and SC is shown in Figure 2. The left panels show the 6,811 probesets that generated significant signal in both compartments in all 10 fat samples. More than 90% of clones showed a CV lower than 23.6% and 21.7% in OM and SC adipose tissues, respectively. The right panels show CV distributions of genes that generated significant signal (“present” call) in at least one and up to nine individuals in the OM and SC fat samples. More than 90% of clones showed a CV lower than 22.0% and 20.3% in OM and SC samples, respectively. No difference in CV was observed between fat depots in both subsets of transcripts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlations between gene expression variance or coefficient of variation (% variance) and mean gene expression levels for all 6,811 positive signals regardless of fat depot (A), or in the OM (B) or SC (C) fat compartments.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of coefficients of variation in OM or SC adipose tissue of (A, B) 6,811 probesets that generated significant signal in both fat depots in all 10 subjects, and (C, D) 9,076 and 8,590 probesets that only presented significant signal in at least one and up to nine individuals. Interindividual variability was similar in both sets of transcripts. No difference in CV distribution was observed between fat depots.

Among the 6,811 probesets that generated significant signal (“present” call) in both depots in all 10 subjects, we selected probesets that were in the top 2 percentile of CV in each depot, and then identified the ones (68 probesets in each depot) that were in the upper tertile of mean gene expression level (Tables 1 and 2). Sixty-three genes were obtained in both fat compartments. Selected pathways with highly variable transcripts in SC and OM adipose tissue are shown in Table 3. Some pathways were highly variable in both fat depots, including pathways of hematopoietic cell lineage, the Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway, genes involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, leukocyte transendothelial migration, and the GnRH signaling pathway (PLA2G2A and TFRC). Conversely, several pathways were highly variable only in OM or SC adipose tissue samples. Transcripts related to the Jak-STAT, Wnt, adipocytokine, apoptosis, and MAPK signaling pathways were more variable among OM samples. We also found that pyruvate kinase (PKM2), a transcript related to insulin signaling, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and type 2 diabetes, was more variable among SC samples. The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis system revealed that 18 transcripts in the SC dataset were involved in lipid metabolism, which was clearly the top function associated with this dataset, whereas 28 transcripts were associated with cell death in OM fat (Table 4).

TABLE 1.

LIST OF THE 68 OM ADIPOSE TISSUE TRANSCRIPTS IN UPPER TERTILE OF MEAN EXPRESSION LEVEL AND TOP 2 PERCENTILE OF THE COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION

Probeset Symbol Description Cytogen. Band Accession % CV
217739_s_at PBEF1 Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor 7q22.2 NM_005746 100.5
202241_at TRIB1 Phosphoprotein regulated by mitogenic pathways 8q24.13 NM_025195 95.0
204472_at GEM GTP binding protein overexpressed in skeletal muscle 8q13-q21 NM_005261 91.3
202643_s_at TNFAIP3 Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 6q23 AI738896 86.6
202644_s_at TNFAIP3 Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 6q23 NM_006290 83.3
202637_s_at ICAM1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (CD54), human rhinovirus receptor 19p13.3-p13.2 AI608725 78.8
202638_s_at ICAM1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (CD54), human rhinovirus receptor 19p13.3-p13.2 NM_000201 46.6
212724_at RND3 Ras homolog gene family, member E 2q23.3 BG054844 77.6
36711_at MAFF V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F (avian) 22q13.1 AL021977 76.3
204007_at FCGR3B Fc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIIb, receptor for (CD16) 1q23 J04162 71.4
202917_s_at S100A8 S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) 1q21 NM_002964 70.9
203574_at NFIL3 Nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated 9q22 NM_005384 66.0
221541_at CRISPLD2 Hypothetical protein DKFZp434B044 16q24.1 AL136861 64.2
221477_s_at MGC5618 Hypothetical protein MGC5618 BF575213 63.3
202388_at RGS2 Regulator of G-protein signaling 2, 24kD 1q31 NM_002923 63.1
217546_at MT1M Metallothionein 1M 16q13 R06655 62.2
200798_x_at MCL1 Myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (BCL2-related) 1q21 NM_021960 61.3
200797_s_at MCL1 Myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (BCL2-related) 1q21 AI275690 39
207574_s_at GADD45B Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta 19p13.3 NM_015675 61.1
208152_s_at DDX21 DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 21 10q21 NM_004728 60.7
204881_s_at UGCG UDP-glucose ceramide glucosyltransferase 9q31 NM_003358 60.1
201325_s_at EMP1 Epithelial membrane protein 1 12p12.3 NM_001423 60.1
201502_s_at NFKBIA Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha 14q13 AI078167 59.5
202672_s_at ATF3 Activating transcription factor 3 1q32.3 NM_001674 59.1
209193_at PIM1 Pim-1 oncogene 6p21.2 M24779 59.0
201858_s_at PRG1 Proteoglycan 1, secretory granule 10q22.1 J03223 56.0
203411_s_at LMNA Lamin A/C 1q21.2-q21.3 NM_005572 55.9
212086_x_at LMNA Lamin A/C 1q21.2-q21.3 AK026584 51.2
201631_s_at IER3 Immediate early response 3 6p21.3 NM_003897 54.4
202391_at BASP1 Brain abundant, membrane attached signal protein 1 5p15.1-p14 NM_006317 53.7
208836_at ATP1B3 ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 3 polypeptide 3q23 U51478 53.3
207332_s_at TFRC Transferrin receptor (p90, CD71) 3q29 NM_003234 53.1
208691_at TFRC Transferrin receptor (p90, CD71) 3q29 BC001188 52.5
200800_s_at HSPA1A Heat shock 70kD protein 1A 6p21.3 NM_005345 51.9
208470_s_at HPR Haptoglobin-related protein 16q22.1 NM_020995 51.7
208151_x_at DDX17 DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 17 22q13.1 NM_030881 51.2
209340_at UAP1 UDP-N-acteylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 1q23.3 S73498 51.1
202581_at HSPA1B Heat shock 70kD protein 1B 6p21.3 NM_005346 50.8
200768_s_at MAT2A Methionine adenosyltransferase II, alpha 2p11.2 BC001686 49.6
214038_at CCL8 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8 17q11.2 AI984980 48.6
201466_s_at JUN V-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian) 1p32-p31 NM_002228 48.0
201739_at SGK Serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 6q23 NM_005627 47.5
200666_s_at DNAJB1 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 1 19p13.2 NM_006145 47.5
213629_x_at MT1F Metallothionein 1F (functional) 16q13 BF246115 47.0
217165_x_at MT1F Metallothionein 1F (functional) 16q13 M10943 41.2
200831_s_at SCD Stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9-desaturase) 10q23-q24 AA678241 46.7
212185_x_at MT2A Metallothionein 2A 16q13 NM_005953 46.5
200704_at LITAF Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF factor 16p13.13 AB034747 45.7
211456_x_at LOC645745 Metallothionein 1H-like protein 1q43 AF333388 45.5
208581_x_at MT1X Metallothionein IX 16q13 NM_005952 44.9
202238_s_at NNMT Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase 11q23.1 NM_006169 44.6
204419_x_at HBG2 Hemoglobin, gamma G 11p15.5 NM_000184 44.6
221841_s_at KLF4 Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut) 9q31 BF514079 44.0
202081_at IER2 Immediate early response 2 19p13.13 NM_004907 43.9
203649_s_at PLA2G2A Phospholipase A2, group IIA (platelets, synovial fluid) 1p35 NM_000300 43.6
220046_s_at CCNL1 Cyclin L1 3q25.32 NM_020307 43.2
205100_at GFPT2 Glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 2 5q34-q35 NM_005110 43.1
201289_at CYR61 Cysteine-rich, angiogenic inducer, 61 1p31-p22 NM_001554 42.8
215499_at LOC651423 Similar to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 isoform A 17q11.2 AA780381 42.3
201473_at JUNB Jun B proto-oncogene 19p13.2 NM_002229 42.0
205516_x_at CIZ1 CDNK1A interacting zinc finger protein 9q34.1 NM_012127 42.0
221651_x_at IGKC Immunoglobulin kappa constant 2p12 BC005332 41.3
204745_x_at MT1G Metallothionein 1G 16q13 NM_005950 41.3
200881_s_at DNAJA1 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 1 9p13-p12 NM_001539 41.2
217753_s_at RPS26 Ribosomal protein S26 12q13 NM_001029 40.7
218520_at TBK1 TANK-binding kinase 1 12q14.1 NM_013254 40.4
200989_at HIF1A Hypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit (basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor) 14q21-q24 NM_001530 39.7
212859_x_at MT1E Metallothionein 1E (functional) 16q13 BF217861 39.2

TABLE 2.

LIST OF THE 68 SC ADIPOSE TISSUE TRANSCRIPTS IN THE UPPER TERTILE OF MEAN EXPRESSION LEVEL AND TOP 2 PERCENTILE OF THE COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION

Probeset Symbol Description Cytogen. Band Accession % CV
212657_s_at IL1RN Interleukin 1 receptor antagonis 2q14.2 U65590 121.4
209875_s_at SPP1 Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (osteopontin, bone sialoprotein I, early T-lymphocyte activation 1) 4q21-q25 M83248 111.9
209395_at CHI3L1 Chitinase 3-like 1 (cartilage glycoprotein-39) 1q32.1 M80927 107.9
203936_s_at MMP9 Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (gelatinase B, 92kD gelatinase, 92kD type IV collagenase) 20q11.2-q13.1 NM_004994 92.0
208691_at TFRC Transferrin receptor (p90, CD71) 3q29 BC001188 79.9
207332_s_at TFRC Transferrin receptor (p90, CD71) 3q29 NM_003234 66.3
201952_at ALCAM Activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule 3q13.1 AA156721 78.8
201422_at IFI30 Interferon, gamma-inducible protein 30 19p13.1 NM_006332 75.5
201850_at CAPG Capping protein (actin filament), gelsolin-like 2p11.2 NM_001747 71.1
201847_at LIPA Lipase A, lysosomal acid, cholesterol esterase (Wolman disease) 10q23.2-q23.3 NM_000235 64.2
201720_s_at LAPTM5 Lysosomal-associated multispanning membrane protein 5 1p34 AI589086 62.6
201721_s_at LAPTM5 Lysosomal-associated multispanning membrane protein 5 1p34 NM_006762 60.7
203523_at LSP1 Lymphocyte-specific protein 1 11p15.5 NM_002339 62.6
213274_s_at CTSB Cathepsin B 8p22 AA020826 61.9
200838_at CTSB Cathepsin B 8p22 NM_001908 57.5
200839_s_at CTSB Cathepsin B 8p22 NM_001908 44.9
213275_x_at CTSB Cathepsin B 8p22 W47179 38.9
219454_at EGFL6 EGF-like-domain, multiple 6 Xp22 NM_015507 60.8
202803_s_at ITGB2 Integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit) 21q22.3 NM_000211 59.2
202902_s_at CTSS Cathepsin S 1q21 NM_004079 58.2
203337_x_at ITGB1BP1 Integrin beta 1 binding protein 1 2p25.2 NM_004763 55.4
212737_at GM2A GM2 ganglioside activator 5q31.3-q33.1 AL513583 52.5
209122_at ADFP Adipose differentiation-related protein 9p22.1 BC005127 51.3
208607_s_at SAA2 Serum amyloid A2 11p15.1-pl4 NM_030754 51.2
205516_x_at CIZ1 CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1 9q34.1 NM_012127 49.7
202546_at VAMP8 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (endobrevin) 2p12-p11.2 NM_003761 49.6
200766_at CTSD Cathepsin D (lysosomal aspartyl protease) 11p15.5 NM_001909 48.4
202409_at IGF2 Insulin-like growth factor 2 (somatomedin A) 11p15.5 X07868 48.1
204122_at TYROBP TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein 19q13.1 NM_003332 46.8
218520_at TBK1 TANK-binding kinase 1 12q14.1 NM_013254 46.6
214456_x_at SAA1 Serum amyloid A1 11p15.1 M23699 46.6
204232_at FCER1G Fc fragment of IgE, high affinity I, receptor for; gamma polypeptide 1q23 NM_004106 46.3
221651_x_at IGKC Immunoglobulin kappa constant 2p12 BC005332 46.2
201141_at GPNMB Glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb 7p15 NM_002510 46.0
201201_at CSTB Cystatin B (stefin B) 21q22.3 NM_000100 45.9
221269_s_at SH3BGRL3 SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein like 3 1p35-p34.3 NM_031286 45.3
203649_s_at PLA2G2A Phospholipase A2, group IIA (platelets, synovial fluid) 1p35 NM_000300 42.9
218540_at THTPA Thiamine triphosphatase 14q11.2 NM_024328 42.1
209659_s_at CDC16 CDC16 cell division cycle 16 homolog (S. cerevisiae) 13q34 AF164598 41.9
20083l_s_at SCD Stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9-desaturase) 10q23-q24 AA678241 41.6
213553_x_at APOC1 Apolipoprotein C-I 19q13.2 W79394 41.4
213101_s_at ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast) 2q14.1 Z78330 40.0
202605_at GUSB Glucuronidase, beta 7q21.11 NM_000181 39.7
201050_at PLD3 Phospholipase D family, member 3 19q13.2 NM_012268 39.6
202399_s_at AP3S2 Adaptor-related protein complex 3, sigma 2 subunit 15q26.1 NM_005829 39.5
202404_s_at COL1A2 Collagen, type I, alpha 2 7q22.1 NM_000089 39.5
201108_s_at THBS1 Thrombospondin 1 15q15 BF055462 38.9
201470_at GSTO1 Glutathione-S-transferase omega 1 10q25.1 NM_004832 38.8
201251_at PKM2 Pyruvate kinase, muscle 15q22 NM_002654 38.5
200078_s_at ATP6V0B ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 21kDa, V0 subunit b 1p32.3 BC005876 37.9
213515_x_at HBG1 Hemoglobin, gamma A 11p15.5 AI133353 37.7
217118_s_at C22orf9 Chromosome 22 open reading frame 9 22q13.31 AK025608 37.6
203382_s_at APOE Apolipoprotein E 19q13.2 NM_000041 37.6
201944_at HEXB Hexosaminidase B (beta polypeptide) 5q13 NM_000521 37.2
209390_at TSC1 Tuberous sclerosis 1 9q34 AF013168 37.0
203381_s_at APOE Apolipoprotein E 19q13.2 N33009 36.8
201005_at CD9 CD9 molecule 12p13.3 NM_001769 36.7
218109_s_at MFSD1 Major facilitator superfamily domain containing 1 3q25.33 NM_022736 36.5
203920_at NR1H3 Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 3 11p11.2 NM_005693 36.4
207168_s_at H2AFY H2A histone family, member Y 5q31.3-q32 NM_004893 36.4
208998_at UCP2 Uncoupling protein 2 (mitochondrial, proton carrier) 11q13.4 U94592 35.7
207977_s_at DPT Dermatopontin 1q12-q23 NM_001937 35.7
203416_at CD53 CD53 molecule 1p13 NM_000560 35.7
201954_at ARPC1B Actin related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 1B, 41 kDa 7q22.1 NM_005720 35.6
201525_at APOD Apolipoprotein D 3q26.2-qter NM_001647 35.4
209183_s_at C10orf10 Chromosome 10 open reading frame 10 10q11.21 AL136653 35.0
202087_s_at CTSL Cathepsin L 9q21-q22 NM_001912 34.9
217753_s_at RPS26 Ribosomal protein S26 12q13 NM_001029 34.7

TABLE 3.

SELECTED PATHWAYS WITH HIGHLY VARIABLE TRANSCRIPTS IN OM AND SC ADIPOSE TISSUE, BASED ON THE COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION IN GENE EXPRESSION LEVEL

Omental Adipose Tissue Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
Pathway No. of Genes Symbols Pathway No. of Genes Symbols
Aminosugars metabolism 2 UAP1, GFPT2 Aminosugars metabolism 1 HEXB
Antigen processing and presentation 2 HSPA1A, HSPA1B Antigen processing and presentation 4 IFI30, CTSB**, CTSS, CTSL
Arachidonic acid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A Arachidonic acid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) 1 ICAM1* Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) 2 ITGB2, ALCAM
Cell communication 1 LMNA* Cell communication 3 SPP1, COL1A2, THBS1
Cell cycle 1 GADD45B Cell cycle 1 CDC16
Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway 2 PLA2G2A, MAP2K3 Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway 2 PLA2G2A, FCER1G
Focal adhesion 1 JUN Focal adhesion 3 SPP1, COL1A2, THBS1
Glycan structures—biosynthesis 2 1 UGCG Glycan structures—degradation 2 GUSB,HEXB
Glycerophospholipid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A Glycerophospholipid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A
GnRH signaling pathway 2 PLA2G2A, MAP2K3 GnRH signaling pathway 1 PLA2G2A
Hematopoietic cell lineage 1 TFRC* Hematopoietic cell lineage 2 TFRC, CD9
Leukocyte transendothelial migration 1 ICAM1* Leukocyte transendothelial migration 3 ITGB2, MMP9, TFRC
Linoleic acid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A Linoleic acid metabolism 1 PLA2G2A
Long-term depression 1 PLA2G2A Long-term depression 1 PLA2G2A
MAPK signaling pathway 6 GADD45B, HSPA1A, HS-PA1B, JUN, PLA2G2A, MAP2K3 MAPK signaling pathway 1 PLA2G2A
mTOR signaling pathway 1 HIF1A mTOR signaling pathway 1 TSC1
Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity 2 ICAM1*, FCGR3B Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity 3 ITGB2, FCER1G, TYROBP
Ribosome 1 RPS26 Ribosome 1 RPS26
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway 4 NFKBIA, MAP2K3, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway 1 TBK1
VEGF signaling pathway 1 PLA2G2A VEGF signaling pathway 1 PLA2G2A
Wnt signaling pathway 1 JUN Alkaloid biosynthesis II 1 LIPA
Adipocytokine signaling pathway 1 NFKBIA Alzheimer’s disease 1 APOE*
Apoptosis 1 NFKBIA ATP synthesis 1 ATP6V0B
B cell receptor signaling pathway 2 NFKBIA, JUN Bile acid biosynthesis 1 LIPA
Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction 1 CCL8 Carbon fixation 1 PKM2
Epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection 1 NFKBIA Cholera—infection 1 ATP6V0B
Glutamate metabolism 1 GFPT2 ECM-receptor interaction 3 SPP1, COL1A2, THBS1
Glycosphingolipid metabolism 1 UGCG Globoside metabolism 1 HEXB
Jak-STAT signaling pathway 1 PIM1 Glutathione metabolism 1 GSTOl
Methionine metabolism 1 MAT2A Glycerolipid metabolism 1 LIPA
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism 2 NNMT, PBEF1 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis 1 PKM2
Selenoamino acid metabolism 1 MAT2A Glycosaminoglycan degradation 2 GUSB, HEXB
T cell receptor signaling pathway 2 NFKBIA, JUN Insulin signaling pathway 2 PKM2, TSC1
Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 1 GSTOl
Neurodegenerative Disorders 1 APOE*
N-Glycan degradation 1 HEXB
Oxidative phosphorylation 1 ATP6V0B
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions 1 GUSB
Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism 1 GUSB
Pyruvate metabolism 1 PKM2*
Regulation of actin cytoskeleton 2 ITGB2, ARPC1B
SNARE interactions in vesicular transport 1 VAMP8
Starch and sucrose metabolism 1 GUSB
TGF-beta signaling pathway 1 THBS1
Thiamine metabolism 1 THTPA
Type II diabetes mellitus 1 PKM2
Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis 1 CDC16
*

Two probesets generated similar results for these genes.

TABLE 4.

GENES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TOP FUNCTION IN THE OM AND SC DATASETS CONTAINING HIGHLY VARIABLE TRANSCRIPTS

Category/Process Genes
Omental adipose tissue: cell death
 Cell death ATF3, CYR61, DNAJB1, EMP1, GADD45B, HIF1A, HSPA1A, HSPA1B, ICAM1, IER3, JUN, JUNB, KLF4, MAP2K3, MCL1, MT1X, MT2A, NFIL3, NFKBIA, PBEF1, PIM1, PRG1, S100A8, SGK, TBK1, TFRC, TNFAIP3, UGCG
 Apoptosis ATF3, CYR61, GADD45B, HIF1A, HSPA1A, HSPA1B, ICAM1, IER3, JUN, KLF4, MAP2K3, MCL1, MT2A, NFIL3, NFKBIA, PBEF1, PIM1, PRG1, S100A8, SGK, TBK1, TFRC, TNFAIP3, UGCG
 Killing HSPA1A, HSPA1B, S100A8
 Cell viability LMNA, MCL1, MT2A, NFKBIA, TNFAIP3, UGCG
 Cytotoxicity FCGR3B, MT2A, TNFAIP3
 Survival CYR61, HIF1A, HSPA1B, JUN, MCL1, NFIL3, NFKBIA, PIM1, UGCG
 Colony survival JUN
 Inhibition HSPA1B, IER3, MCL1
 Activation-induced cell death ICAM1
Subcutaneous adipose tissue: lipid metabolism
 Storage ADFP, GM2A, LIPA, SCD
 Quantity APOC1, APOE, CTSS, FCER1G, LIPA, NR1H3, PLA2G2A, SCD, UCP2, IL1RN
 Synthesis APOE, CD9, FCER1G, NR1H3, PLA2G2A, SCD
 Release CTSB, FCER1G, IL1RN, PLA2G2A
 Modification APOE, PLA2G2A, SCD, UCP2, ITGB2
 Efflux APOE, NR1H3, SAA1
 Hydrolysis GM2A, HEXB, PLA2G2A
 Accumulation APOE, NR1H3, IL1RN, UCP2, APOC1
 Production APOE, IL1RN, ITGB2, PLA2G2A, NR1H3
 Activation NR1H3
 Esterification APOE, SCD
 Oxidation APOE, SCD, UCP2
 Peroxidation APOE, PLA2G2A
 Co-capping ITGB2
 Uptake APOC1, APOE
 Metabolism APOC1, APOD, IL1RN, PLA2G2A, SCD
 Exchange APOC1
 Liberation PLA2G2A
 Degradation GM2A, PLA2G2A
 Desaturation SCD
 Secretion APOE, SCD
 Steroidogenesis APOE
 Transport ADFP

DISCUSSION

Regional fat distribution accounts for an important part of the association between obesity and related metabolic complications. In the present study, we used SC and OM adipose tissue samples from 10 obese men for microarray hybridizations, and measured expression levels for ∼22,200 probesets. We studied the interindividual variability of gene expression in both depots, and attempted to identify highly variable transcripts or pathways in these fat compartments. Interindividual variability in gene expression in both depots in all subjects was rather low. In addition, no difference in the distribution of CVs was observed among fat depots. This provides evidence that gene expression within abdominal OM and SC adipose tissue samples is relatively homogenous, and indirectly suggests that primary characteristics of adipose tissue from both the SC and OM compartments are relatively similar. Several studies have now used microarrays to investigate gene expression profiling of adipose tissue in rodents (2–4,16) and humans (12,15,23). However, no study had examined human adipose tissue gene expression variability. Individual analyses of adipose tissue gene expression within a homogeneous study group or population might help to identify possible new functional links between different genes. This is the largest microarray study of human SC and OM fat performed to date and the first to provide information on the interindividual variability of gene expression in human adipose tissue.

SC and OM fat have been demonstrated as being very different in terms of lipolysis, cytokine secretion, and linking to disease risks such as insulin resistance and dyslipidemia (6,19,22). This wide heterogeneity among individuals could potentially be reflected by different patterns of gene expression in each fat depot. We measured some variability in gene expression in the present analysis. However, the adipose tissue transcriptome appeared as relatively stable, because interindividual variability was rather low, with more than 90% of clones showing a CV lower than 23.6% and 21.7% in OM and SC adipose tissues, respectively, in the 6,811 probsets that generated significant signal in both fat depots in all 10 subjects. Variability in the probesets that were silenced in at least one and up to nine individuals out of 10 in both depots showed similar variability, and no difference in distributions of CVs was observed between fat depots. Interestingly, Boeuf et al. (2) obtained strikingly similar data when analyzing the individual variability of gene expression in subcutaneous white and brown adipose tissue of hamsters. They found that individual variability of gene expression in both types of fats was also low, with more than 80% of clones showing a CV lower than 30%. These results led the authors to conclude that gene expression in adipose tissue was rather robust and stable for animals, under identical environmental conditions. In the present study, gene expression variability was very consistent with that observed by Boeuf et al (2). We suggest that even in human subjects not under controlled physiological, metabolic, and environmental situations, adipose tissue gene expression is relatively homogeneous. Our results also indicate that the larger portion of genes in SC and OM adipose tissue have stable expression and suggest that only a few pivotal genes might be responsible for the demonstrated regional differences in adipose tissue physiology and related complications.

Among the set of highly variable transcripts, we found that genes in SC samples were mostly involved in lipid metabolism. We also found that a transcript related to insulin signaling, PKM2, was more variable among SC than OM samples. Insulin increases glucose uptake in muscle and fat, and promotes the storage of substrates in fat, liver, and muscle by stimulating lipogenesis, glycogen and protein synthesis, and by inhibiting lipolysis, glycogenolysis, and protein breakdown. PKM2 is a glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphoryl group from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to ADP, generating ATP (13). Kim et al. (14) examined mice with tissue-specific overexpression of LPL and their findings indicated a direct and causative relationship between the accumulation of intracellular fatty acid-derived metabolites and insulin resistance mediated via alterations in the insulin signaling pathway. This phenomenon has been suggested to occur as a means to prevent further fat accumulation in a given tissue, the reduction in insulin action seen in insulin-resistant states affecting metabolic fuel partitioning (8). High variability of SC adipose tissue genes of fat storage and insulin signaling may reflect high variability in the capacity to store fat in this depot in the presence of energy excess.

Cytokines regulate several aspects of adipose tissue metabolism (11,18). Some possibly mediate their responses through activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. We found a transcript related to JAK-STAT pathway that was more variable among OM samples. Another interesting finding of this study is that transcripts related to the MAPK, Wnt, and adipocytokine signaling pathways, and to apoptosis were also more variable among OM samples. These transcripts were PIM1, NFKBIA, JUN, PLA2G2A, HSPA1A, HSPA1B, GADD45B, and MAP2K3. Transcripts related to these cellular processes are involved in cell cycle, apoptosis, growth, proliferation, fate determination, development, immunity, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. The proto-oncogene PIM1 has been shown to prevent the normal process of apoptosis, acting as a cell survival factor. GADD45B is involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, signal transduction, and cell survival. The human HSPA multigene family encodes several highly conserved proteins that are expressed in response to heat shock and a variety of other stress stimuli, including oxidative free radicals and toxic metal ions (21). At the same time, we found that among highly variable genes in OM adipose tissue samples, 28 transcripts showing high variability were involved in cell death. These results suggest high interindividual variability in programmed OM fat cell death.

Obesity has been recently suggested as a pro-inflammatory state (10), and white adipose tissue is no longer considered an inert tissue mainly devoted to energy storage but is emerging as an active participant in regulating physiologic and pathologic processes, including immunity and inflammation. Many of these cellular pathways were highly variable in both fat depots. For example, pathways of hematopoietic cell lineage, the Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway, glycerophospholipid metabolism, and leukocyte transendothelial migration included highly variable genes in both fat compartments. Two main genes were responsible for this finding (PLA2G2A, TFRC). PLA2G2A plays an important role in a variety of cellular processes, including the production of precursors for inflammatory reactions. Furthermore, it is a key enzyme in eicosanoid synthesis and is therefore an interesting candidate gene in the context of inflammation (1). TFRC encodes the transferrin receptor, which plays an important role in controlling cell growth through iron uptake. Both genes are involved in inflammation, proliferation, growth, and oncogenesis. Our results may reflect high variability in inflammatory responses in both fat compartments in obesity.

In summary, our data demonstrated that interindividual variability of gene expression in abdominal SC and OM adipose tissue samples from obese men was rather low. Future studies are required to investigate relations between different phenotypes (such as obesity, insulin, blood lipids) and expression of these transcripts.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Vicky Drapeau, Suzy Laroche, and members of the Department of Surgery of Laval Hospital and Drs. Frédéric-Simon Hould, Odette Lescelleur, and Simon Marceau for collaboration in tissue and specimen sampling. Marie-Claude Vohl, André Tchernof, and Yohan Bossé are funded by the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (MVC) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (AT and YB). This work was partially supported by the Donald B. Brown Research Chair on Obesity, the FRSQ-Réseau en santé cardiovasculaire, Genome Québec, and Genome Canada.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bertsch T.; Aufenanger J. Phospholipase A2 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 41:859–860; 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Boeuf S.; Keijer J.; Franssen-Van Hal N. L.; Klaus S. Individual variation of adipose gene expression and identification of covariated genes by cDNA microarrays. Physiol. Genomics 11:31–36; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Boeuf S.; Klingenspor M.; Van Hal N. L.; Schneider T.; Keijer J.; Klaus S. Differential gene expression in white and brown preadipocytes. Physiol. Genomics 7:15–25; 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bullen J. W. Jr.; Ziotopoulou M.; Ungsunan L.; Misra J.; Alevizos I.; Kokkotou E.; Maratos-Flier E.; Stephanopoulos G.; Mantzoros C. S. Short-term resistance to diet-induced obesity in A/J mice is not associated with regulation of hypothalamic neuropeptides. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 287:E662–E670; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chan D. C.; Watts G. F.; Sussekov A. V.; Barrett P. H.; Yang Z.; Hua J.; Song S. Adipose tissue compartments and insulin resistance in overweight-obese Caucasian men. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 63:77–85; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Despres J. P.; Moorjani S.; Ferland M.; Tremblay A.; Lupien P. J.; Nadeau A.; Pinault S.; Theriault G.; Bouchard C. Adipose tissue distribution and plasma lipoprotein levels in obese women. Importance of intra-abdominal fat. Arteriosclerosis 9:203–210; 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Despres J. P.; Nadeau A.; Tremblay A.; Ferland M.; Moorjani S.; Lupien P. J.; Theriault G.; Pinault S.; Bouchard C. Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes 38:304–309; 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Eckel R. H. Insulin resistance: An adaptation for weight maintenance. Lancet 340:1452–1453; 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Executive Summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497; 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fantuzzi G. Adipose tissue, adipokines, and inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 115:911–999; 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fried S. K.; Bunkin D. A.; Greenberg A. S. Omental and subcutaneous adipose tissues of obese subjects release interleukin-6: Depot difference and regulation by glucocorticoid. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83:847–850; 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gomez-Ambrosi J.; Catalan V.; Diez-Caballero A.; Martnez-Cruz L. A.; Gil M. J.; Garcia-Foncillas J.; Cienfuegos J. A.; Salvador J.; Mato J. M.; Fruhbeck G. Gene expression profile of omental adipose tissue in human obesity. FASEB J. 18:215–217; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ikeda Y.; Noguchi T. Allosteric regulation of pyruvate kinase M-2 isozyme involves a cysteine residue in the intersubunit contact. J. Biol. Chem. 273:12227–12233; 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kim J. K.; Fillmore J. J.; Chen Y.; Yu C.; Moore I. K.; Pypaert M.; Lutz E. P.; Kako Y.; Velez-Carrasco W.; Goldberg I. J.; Breslow J. L.; Shulman G. I. Tissue-specific overexpression of lipoprotein lipase causes tissue-specific insulin resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:7522–7527; 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Linder K.; Arner P.; Flores-Morales A.; Tollet-Egnell P.; Norstedt G. Differentially expressed genes in visceral or subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese men and women. J. Lipid Res. 45:148–154; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lopez I. P.; Marti A.; Milagro F. I.; Zulet Md Mde L.; Moreno-Aliaga M. J.; Martinez J. A.; De Miguel C. DNA microarray analysis of genes differentially expressed in diet-induced (cafeteria) obese rats. Obes. Res. 11:188–194; 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Marceau P.; Biron S.; Hould F. S.; Marceau S.; Simard S.; Thung S. N.; Kral J. G. Liver pathology and the metabolic syndrome X in severe obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84:1513–1517; 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mohamed-Ali V.; Pinkney J. H.; Coppack S. W. Adipose tissue as an endocrine and paracrine organ. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 83:1145–1158; 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Motoshima H.; Wu X.; Sinha M. K.; Hardy V. E.; Rosato E. L.; Barbot D. J.; Rosato F. E.; Goldstein B. J. Differential regulation of adiponectin secretion from cultured human omental and subcutaneous adipocytes: effects of insulin and rosiglitazone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87:5662–5667; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Novak J. P.; Sladek R.; Hudson T. J. Characterization of variability in large-scale gene expression data: Implications for study design. Genomics 79:104–113; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pelham H. R. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell 46:959–961; 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tchernof A.; Belanger C.; Morisset A. S.; Richard C.; Mailloux J.; Laberge P.; Dupont P. Regional differences in adipose tissue metabolism in women: Minor effect of obesity and body fat distribution. Diabetes 55:1353–1360; 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Vohl M. C.; Sladek R.; Robitaille J.; Gurd S.; Marceau P.; Richard D.; Hudson T. J.; Tchernof A. A survey of genes differentially expressed in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in men. Obes. Res. 12:1217–1222; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wajchenberg B. L. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: Their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr. Rev. 21:697–738; 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gene Expression are provided here courtesy of Cognizant Communication Corporation

RESOURCES