Abstract
A post-Ugi diastereoselective one-pot cascade reaction requiring no metal catalyst was developed. The reaction scope was wide with mild conditions and good yields. A collection of spiroindolines was prepared by the protocol and screening tests in several difficult-to-inhibit cancer cell lines were conducted. The relationship of structure and anticancer activities was promising and in the Huh7 cell lines compound 16 j is more potent than Vinbalstine. The cyclization design strategy could be applicable to other multicomponent reactions (MCRs) for synthesizing bioactive and drug-like heterocycles.
Keywords: cyclization reactions, multicomponent reactions, spiroindolines, synthetic methods, Ugi reaction
Spiroindoline derivatives including pharmaceuticals, natural products, and privileged scaffolds are important heterocyclic compounds and exhibited a wide range of biological properties as shown in Figure 1. Vinbalstine 1 is a legendary marketed drug for the treatment of a variety of cancers.[1] Perophoramidine 2, a natural product, demonstrated an exciting cytotoxicity against the HMT 116 colon carcinoma cells.[2] Communesin F 3 and its analogues were isolated from marine sources and showed significant antileukemic and insecticidal activities,[3] and aspidophytine 4 showed broad anti-insecticidal activities.[4]
Figure 1.

Natural and privileged spiroindolines.
Recently, privileged scaffolds represented by spiroindolines 5 and 6 were prepared through a multi-component post-Ugi cascade reaction with an improved two or three step operation.[5] However, rhodium(II)[5a] or gold-catalysts[5b] were required in the synthesis. The cost-effective and environment-friendly conditions, short reaction steps, and simple work-ups are still desirable.[6]
During the past few years, we have been focusing on the use of the Ugi four-component reaction (U-4CR) for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing heterocycles in a cost-effective manner without medal catalyst.[7] In the construction of the pyrrolopyridinone core as shown in Scheme 1, the unpurified Ugi product 7 was used for the pyrrole cyclization reaction under the previously optimized conditions (i.e., 10 % TFA/DCE solution, 150 °C, microwave irradiation, 10 min) to give benzimidazoisoquinoline 8.[8] A C–C bond between the carbonyl (ketone) carbon atom and the C-3 carbon atom of the pyrrole moiety, rather than a C–N bond between the carbonyl (ketone) carbon and the nitrogen atom of the pyrrole, was formed in situ under acidic conditions. We therefore designed and prepared Ugi indole analogue 9, which has reduced nucleophilicity of the indole C-3 carbon upon the introduction of the Boc-protecting group to the indole nitrogen. The C-2 carbon position was activated with the substitution of a nitrogen atom on the C-3 carbon atom of the indole moiety. We envisaged that if the cyclization reaction occurs at the C-2 carbon atom of the indole moiety, the resulting iminium cation 9a could lead to sequential cyclization of the nitrogen atom of another amide with the iminium cation to produce highly functionalized spiroindoline 10.
Scheme 1.
Approach to indole cyclization.
We initially investigated the possibility of using tert-butyl 3-amino-1H-indole-1-carboxylate 13 as a starting material in an Ugi reaction with 2-oxo-2-phenylacetic acid 11a, aldehyde 12a, and isocyanide 14a to form the Ugi product 15a (in Scheme 2). With compound 15a, the previously optimized acidic conditions (10 % TFA/DCE solution, 150 °C, microwave irradiation, 10 min) was tested.[8] Unprecedentedly, the diastereoselective formation of the fully functionalized spiroindoline 9a occurred without a medal catalyst in one pot. Other diastereomers were not detected in the HPLC-MS determination and column purification. As expected, a 5-exo-dig indole cyclization likely occurred to produce proposed intermediate 9a, which underwent a second sequential cyclization and aromatization to give compound 16a in a diastereoselective manner in 53 % yield (Scheme 2). The relative stereochemistry of compound 16a was unambiguously determined to be the trans-conformation by X-ray crystallography (Figure 2).[9]
Scheme 2.

Synthetic strategy to prepare compound 16a.
Figure 2.

X-ray crystal structure of compound 16 a.
It was anticipated that analogous tetracyclic spiroindoline 16a could afford a broad range of bioactive compounds with potential applications in anticancer research.[10] To synthesize a small library of spiroindolines for biological screenings, we further optimized reaction conditions for high yield. A variety of different acids, bases, temperatures, and reaction times (Table 1) were investigated. The U-4CR proceeded well in methanol to give Ugi adduct 15a.[7] The acidic conditions with 5 % HCl in AcOH or 10 % TFA/DCE (DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane) was examined at different temperatures. Gratifyingly, the microwave irradiation at 100 °C in 10 % TFA/DCE for 10 min could afford the desired product 16a in 92 % yield. The higher temperatures at 150 and 120 °C led to a sharp reduction of yields to 53 and 63 %, respectively. It is noteworthy that the reaction failed to afford the desired product 16a when it was conducted without microwave irradiation at room temperature or in refluxing solvent (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). We also investigated the cyclization reaction with a variety of different organic and inorganic bases under microwave irradiation conditions (Table 1, entries 9–16). Interestingly, organic bases still could afford compound 16 a (entries 10–13), but the yields were much lower. The use of inorganic bases failed to afford compound 16a (entries 15–16). Hence, the optimized reaction conditions are shown in entry 3: the reaction was heated with microwave irradiation at 100 °C for 10 min in 10 % TFA/DCE.
Table 1.
Optimization of reaction for compound 16a.
| Entry | Solvent and conditions | T [°C] | Time [min] | Yield [%][a] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 % TFA/DCE | MW 80 | 10 min | 65 |
| 2 | 10 % TFA/DCE | MW 90 | 10 | 73 |
| 3 | 10% TFA/DCE | MW 100 | 10 | 92 |
| 4 | 10 % TFA/DCE | MW 120 | 10 | 63 |
| 5 | 10 % TFA/DCE | MW 100 | 20 | 81 |
| 6 | 5 % HCl/AcOH | MW 100 | 10 | 42 |
| 7 | 10 % TFA/DCE | r.t. | 720 | NR |
| 8 | 10 % TFA/DCE | reflux | 360 | NR |
| 9 | DMF/DBU (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 10 | trace |
| 10 | DMF/DBU (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 20 | 12 |
| 11 | DMF/DBU (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 30 | 18 |
| 12 | DMF/DBU (2 equiv.) | MW 180 | 30 | 32 |
| 13 | DMF/DIPA (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 30 | 24 |
| 14 | DMF/TEA (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 30 | NR |
| 15 | DMF/K2CO3 (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 30 | NR |
| 16 | DMF/NaOH (2 equiv.) | MW 150 | 30 | NR |
Yield of isolated product.
MW = microwave irradiation. NR = No reaction.
Encouraged by the remarkable yield under the optimized conditions, we investigated the scope of this transformation by varying starting materials. In all cases, the initial Ugi product 15 was used directly in the next step without purification after the removal of solvent under a gentle stream of nitrogen. A variety of different starting materials were employed under the optimized conditions for the construction of structurally diverse tetracyclic spiroindolines 16a–n with yields in the range of 65–89 % (Table 2), indicating good functional-group tolerance. It is noteworthy that the final products were readily purified by column chromatography over silica gel in high purity (>95 %).
Table 2.
Scope of the Ugi/domino cyclization route leading to spiroindolines 16 a–n.[a]
Yield of isolated product for one-pot procedure.
Based on the above experimental results, we have postulated a plausible mechanism for the diastereoselective cyclization reaction, which is shown in Figure 3. An enantiomer, the R-intermediate (17a, not isolated), would undergo a nucleophilic attack of the iminium cation from the nitrogen atom in the remaining amide. Under the acidic conditions, a double bond was clearly formed spontaneously or subsequently with concomitant dehydration to give the final trans compound 16a (R,R). The diastereoselective formation of the trans product could be explained by the favored lipophilic interaction between two benzene ring moieties substituted on two chiral centers. In addition, two oxygen atoms would have lipophobic and steric hindrance to the benzene group as shown in compound 16a′ (S,R). The reaction is expected proceed under thermodynamic control and the relative energy was calculated for compound 16 a′ (S,R) with 8.42 kcal mol−1 higher over 16a (R,R) with 0.0 kcal mol−1.[11]
Figure 3.
Proposed synthetic mechanism leading to compound 16 a.
To evaluate potentials for developing a drug candidate from compounds 16 a–n, a thymidine incorporation assay was used to measure cancer cell viability upon treatment. The cancer cell lines PANC-1, Huh7, MDAMB468 and MHCC97-H were selected, which are some of the more difficult-to-inhibit cell lines in the National Cancer Institute’s 60 human tumor cell lines panel. Compounds 16 b, 16e–h, and 16 j exhibited respectful anticancer activities in the human liver cancer Huh7 cell lines with IC50 less than 10 μM in Table 3. Remarkably, compound 16j inhibited the Huh7 cell line proliferation with IC50 of 2.0 μM, in contrast vinbalstine 1 was only active on the same cell line with an IC50 of 45.6 μM. Compounds 16a and 16 f were also active against the triple negative breast cancer MDAMB468 cell lines with IC50 of 6 μM and 8 μM, respectively. Compounds 16c and 16h inhibited the cancer cell proliferation in another liver cancer MHCC97-H cell lines with IC50 of 5 μM and 8 μM, respectively.
Table 3.
Anticancer activities IC50 (μM) of compounds 16a–n for cancer cell lines.[a]
| Entry | Cpd. | PANC-1 | Huh7 | MDAMB468 | MHCC97-H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 a | 35 ± 2.6 | 19 ± 2.5 | 6±1.1 | 20 ± 1.5 |
| 2 | 16 b | 22 ± 4.6 | 7±2.1 | 18 ± 2.1 | 17 ± 2.2 |
| 3 | 16 c | 31 ± 5.6 | 30 ± 1.2 | 29 ± 2.1 | 5±1.3 |
| 4 | 16 d | 39 ± 4.2 | 16 ± 1.3 | 10 ± 1.1 | 34 ± 5.6 |
| 5 | 16 e | 10 ± 4.2 | 8±0.8 | 15 ± 2.3 | 10 ± 1.2 |
| 6 | 16 f | 30 ± 2.2 | 4±1.1 | 8±1.2 | 13 ± 1.8 |
| 7 | 16 g | 32 ± 1.4 | 5±1.1 | 18 ± 2.2 | 39 ± 5.1 |
| 8 | 16 h | 16 ± 5.1 | 4±1.2 | 15 ± 1.4 | 8±1.2 |
| 9 | 16 i | 67 ± 2.0 | 63 ± 1.1 | 48 ± 2.2 | 65 ± 1.2 |
| 10 | 16 j | 18 ± 8.2 | 2±1.5 | 21 ± 2.2 | 15 ± 2.5 |
| 11 | 16 k | 18 ± 6.5 | 55 ± 3.8 | 12 ± 0.4 | 32 ± 4.2 |
| 12 | 16 l | 79 ± 1.2 | 77 ± 2.2 | 53 ± 3.3 | 77 ± 4.7 |
| 13 | 16 m | 67 ± 3.1 | 42 ± 3.2 | 42 ± 2.5 | 38 ± 4.8 |
| 14 | 16 n | 56 ± 4.5 | 29 ± 1.1 | 31 ± 3.2 | 30 ± 2.8 |
All MTT assays were repeated three times by using six samples per assay.
In conclusion, we have developed an unprecedented one-pot Ugi-post cascade reaction that proceeds under metal-free conditions for the diastereoselective construction of highly functionalized tetracyclic and drug-like spiroindolines. This method can be expanded for synthesizing structurally diverse spiroindolines by varying starting materials. The isolated final products as well as the proposed reaction mechanism are consistent with the hypothesis and design (Scheme 1). The cascade cyclization design approach would be highly applicable to other multi-component reactions such as Passerini,[12] Petasis,[13] Betti,[14] Kabachnik–Fields,[15] Mannich,[16] among others. With the mild reaction conditions for affording products in good yield and commercially available starting materials, we have quickly prepared a small library of structurally diverse spiroindolines. The screening results are promising, particularly with low micromolar inhibition IC50 (16j) in the Huh7 cell lines, which is more potent than Vinbalstine 1, a well-known anti-cancer drug. Further efforts are ongoing studying the mechanism of action of lead compound 16j and the optimization of its potency and drug properties. Efforts will be also directed toward the application of the cascade cyclization design strategy to the total synthesis of natural products.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (cstc2015jcy-jA1328, cstc2015zdcy-ztzx0191 and cstc2015zdcy-ztzx120003), Chongqing Education commission Project of China (KJZH17129) and the Scientific Research Foundation of the Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences (R2013XY01, R2013XY02 and Z2016BX02). H.L. was supported by the grants NIH R01 CA182424 and R01 CA193813. The authors would also like to thank Ms. H. Z. Liu for obtaining the LC/MS and NMR data.
Footnotes
Supporting information and the ORCID number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201801081.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.a) Druker BJ, Rosenthal DS, Canellos GP. Cancer. 1989;63:1060–1064. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890315)63:6<1060::aid-cncr2820630603>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Gobbi PG, Broglia C, Merli F, Dell’Olio M, Stelitano C, Iannitto E, Federico M, Berté R, Luisi D, Molica S, Cavalli C, Dezza L, Ascari E. Cancer. 2003;98:2393– 2401. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Han SJ, Vogt F, Krishnan S, May JA, Gatti M, Virgil SC, Stoltz BM. Org Lett. 2014;16:3316–3319. doi: 10.1021/ol5013263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Popov K, Hoang A, Somfai P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:1801– 1804. doi: 10.1002/anie.201510661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2016;128:1833–1836. [Google Scholar]; c) Sabahi A, Novikov A, Rainier JD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:4317– 4320. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2006;118:4423– 4426. [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Liu P, Seo JH, Weinreb SM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:2000–2003. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2010;122:2044–2047. [Google Scholar]; b) Park J, Jean A, Chen DYK. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:14237– 14240. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2017;129:14425–14428. [Google Scholar]; c) Liao HH, Chatupheeraphat A, Hsiao CC, Atodiresei I, Rueping M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:15540–15544. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2015;127:15760– 15765. [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) He F, Bo Y, Altom JD, Corey EJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:6771–6772. [Google Scholar]; b) Nicolaou KC, Dalby SM, Majumder U. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14942–14943. doi: 10.1021/ja806176w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Yang R, Qiu FG. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:6015– 6018. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2013;125:6131– 6134. [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Mizoguchi H, Oguri H, Tsuge K, Oikaw H. Org Lett. 2009;11:3016–3019. doi: 10.1021/ol901020a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Modha SG, Kumar A, Vachhani DD, Jacobs J, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van Meervelt L, Van der Eycken EV. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:9572– 9575. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2012;124:9710– 9713. [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Ribelin TP, Judd AS, Akritopoulou-Zanze I, Henry RF, Cross JL, Whittern DN, Djuric SW. Org Lett. 2007;9:5119–5122. doi: 10.1021/ol7023373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Oguri H, Mizoguchi H, Oikawa H, Ishiyama A, Iwatsuki M, Otoguro K, Ōmura S. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2012;8:930–940. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.8.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhuo CX, Zhou Y, Cheng Q, Huang L, You SL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:14146–14149. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2015;127:14352–14355. [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Song G, Li S, Yang Z, Yuan J, Wang M, Zhu J, Chen Z, Xu Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:4616–4618. [Google Scholar]; b) Li S, Gao H, Lei J, Wang J, Xu J, Chen Z, Xu Z. RSC Adv. 2016;6:8461–8464. [Google Scholar]; c) Liao W, Li S, Wang J, Zhang Z, Yang Z, Xu D, Xu C, Lan H, Chen Z, Xu Z. ACS Comb Sci. 2016;18:65– 69. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.5b00145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Li Y, Lei J, Chen Z, Tang D, Yuan H, Wang M, Zhu J, Xu Z. Eur J Org Chem. 2016:5770–5776. [Google Scholar]; b) Wang H, Ganesen A. Org Lett. 1999;1:1647– 1649. [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) CCDC 1811325 (16 a) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Part of this work was applied for in a patent: Chen Z, Xu Z. 107226816. CN. 2017
- 10.a) Galliford CV, Scheidt KA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:8748–8758. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2007;119:8902–8912. [Google Scholar]; b) Yu B, Zheng YC, Shi XJ, Qi PP, Liu HM. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2016;16:1315–1324. doi: 10.2174/1871520615666151102093825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Panda SS, Jones RA, Bachawala P, Mohapatra PP. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2017;17:1515–1536. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160624125108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yu B, Yu DQ, Liu HM. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;97:673–698. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Cannon JS, Overman LE. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:4288– 4311. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2012;124:4362–4386. [Google Scholar]; f) Zhuo CX, Zhang W, You SL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:12662– 12686. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2012;124:12834–12858. [Google Scholar]; g) Tan B, Candeias NR, Barbas CF., III Nat Chem. 2011;3:473– 477. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.The M06-2X/def2-SVP level was used for geometric optimization. We adopted a DFT-D3 vdW correction proposed by Grimme to describe the weak interactions. Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L. J Comput Chem. 2011;32:1456. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21759.
- 12.a) Abdelraheem EMM, Kurpiewska K, Kalinowska-Tłuścik J, Dçmling A. J Org Chem. 2016;81:8789–8795. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kreye O, Tóth T, Meier M. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:1790–1792. doi: 10.1021/ja1113003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Paravidino M, Scheffelaar R, Schmitz RF, de Kanter FJJ, Groen MB, Ruijter E, Orru RVA. J Org Chem. 2007;72:10239–10242. doi: 10.1021/jo701978v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Maeda S, Komagawa S, Uchiyama M, Morokuma K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:644– 649. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2011;123:670–675. [Google Scholar]; e) Kazemizadeh AR, Ramazani A. Curr Org Chem. 2012;16:418– 450. [Google Scholar]
- 13.a) Liepouri F, Bernasconi G, Petasis NA. Org Lett. 2015;17:1628–1631. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Mundal DA, Lutz KE, Thomson RJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:5782–5785. doi: 10.1021/ja301489n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Muncipinto G, Moquist PN, Schreiber SL, Schaus SE. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:8172– 8175. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2011;123:8322– 8325. [Google Scholar]
- 14.a) Dong Y, Li R, Lu J, Xu X, Wang X, Hu Y. J Org Chem. 2005;70:8617–8620. doi: 10.1021/jo051328j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Thinnes CC, Tumber A, Yapp C, Scozzafava G, Yeh T, Chan MC, Tran TA, Hsu K, Tarhonskaya H, Walport LJ, Wilkins SE, Martinez ED, Müller S, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Brennan PE, Kawamura A, Schofield CJ. Chem Commun. 2015;51:15458– 15461. doi: 10.1039/c5cc06095h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a) Cheng X, Goddard R, Buth G, List B. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:5079– 5081. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2008;120:5157–5159. [Google Scholar]; b) Bhagat S, Chakraborti AK. J Org Chem. 2007;72:1263–1270. doi: 10.1021/jo062140i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Joly GD, Jacobson EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4102– 4103. doi: 10.1021/ja0494398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.a) Xu LW, Xia CG, Li L. J Org Chem. 2004;69:8482–8484. doi: 10.1021/jo048778g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kobayashi S, Kiyohara H, Yamaguchi M. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:708–711. doi: 10.1021/ja108764d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hayashi Y, Tsuboi W, Ashimine I, Urushima T, Shoji M, Sakai K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:3677– 3680. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2003;115:3805–3808. [Google Scholar]; d) Jiang J, Xu HD, Xi JB, Ren BY, Lv FP, Guo X, Jiang LQ, Zhang ZY, Hu WH. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:8428– 8431. doi: 10.1021/ja201589k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



