Abstract
Background
Global health education initiatives inconsistently balance trainee growth and benefits to host communities. This report describes a global health elective for medical trainees that focuses on community engagement and participatory research to provide mutually beneficial outcomes for the communities and trainees.
Methods
An eight-year university–community partnership, the Chilcapamba to Montreal Global Health Elective is a two-month shared decision-making research and clinical observership experience in rural Ecuador for medical trainees at McGill University, Canada. Research topics are set by matching community-identified priorities with skillsets and interests of trainees, taking into consideration local potential impact.
Results
Community outcomes included development of a Community Health Worker program, new collaborations with local organizations, community identification of health priorities, and generation of health improvement recommendations. Collaborative academic outputs included multiple bursary awards, conference presentations and published manuscripts.
Conclusion
This medical global health elective engages communities using participatory research to prioritise socially responsible and locally beneficial outcomes.
Introduction
Medical trainees are increasingly expected to be global citizens and require adequate global health training to meet evolving population demands in this role.1-6 Current global health education initiatives offer a mix of both opportunities for personal and professional growth and benefits for the host communities.2,7-11 Trainees have shown they can build sustainable relationships in host communities based on trust.12 Global health electives should equip trainees to work in culturally diverse and underserved and/or vulnerable populations while fostering values of community service, stewardship of health resources and cultural safety.1,6,11,13-17 Cultural safety recognizes power differentials between service providers and recipients, and prioritizes the needs and voice of the recipient.18 This differs from “cultural competency,” which assumes the provider has good knowledge about cultural issues, but can lead to “othering” of the receiver as power differentials still continue sometimes unnoticed and unacknowledged.18,19
Participatory research involves “systematic inquiry, with the collaboration of those affected by the issue being studied, for purposes of education and taking action or effecting change.”20 Participatory research can develop generalizable knowledge, while benefitting the participating community.21-23 It can improve research protocols by including local community expertise and supports knowledge translation, social justice and self-determination.21-23 It nurtures long term relationships with communities, promotes community capacity to proactively investigate and solve problems and can enable communities to gain control over determinants of their health.20,22,24
In this article we describe eight years of experience with a global health elective that benefits both medical trainees and local communities using participatory research for community engagement.
Methods
The partner population
The Chilcapamba to Montreal Global Health Elective (CMGHE) takes place in the Canton of Cotacachi (population ~40,000) in the province of Imbabura, Ecuador. It began in Chilcapamba and now involves three additional indigenous communities ranging from 35 to 120 households.
The elective
The CMGHE is an eight-week research and clinical observership global health elective in rural Ecuador offered to pre-clerkship medical trainees at the end of their first year at McGill University, Canada. The program began in 2008, developed by a McGill medical trainee (AE) and is now overseen by a Spanish speaking multidisciplinary McGill health team working in partnership with local community leaders.
Since 2012, this multidisciplinary McGill team leads a Community Health Worker (CHW) Training Program developed in the same communities. CMGHE trainees work with CHWs as they play a key role in data collection and results dissemination. The CMGHE has been supported by scholarships from the McGill Summer Research Bursary Program.
The process in Ecuador
The program recruits pre-clinical trainees based on fluency in Spanish and willingness to work in respectful community research partnerships. The program leaders confirm research topics by matching community-identified priorities with trainee skillsets and interests. Trainees finalise a research proposal for submission, after approval of community leaders, to the McGill Bursary Competition and Ethics Committee and the local hospital director in Ecuador.
Pre-departure training by McGill University includes topics related to travel, personal safety, and CMGHE program-specific knowledge, with an emphasis on cultural safety.
Cultural immersion occurs in Ecuador and includes the trainees living with a community family and extensive local social interactions. Data collection occurs in partnership with a community leader and the CHWs.
Trainees are supervised by community leaders including the local project coordinator and have regular contact with a McGill supervisor. Clinical exposure includes daily observerships at the local hospital. The patients observed by trainees excludes study participants, to eliminate conflicts of interest. Trainees participate in clinical observerships most mornings, rotating, based on their interests, between inpatient and outpatient general and subspecialty areas.
At the end of the project, trainees produce a lay summary of preliminary results written in Spanish for community dissemination. McGill requires trainees to provide a written summary and a poster presentation at McGill’s annual Student Research Day. Both the report and poster are reviewed by the community leader to ensure accuracy, respect of culture, and for other active input prior to external dissemination. Local collaborators who made significant contributions are co-authors of all submissions and presentations. Later, a CMGHE trainee or a CHW team member returns to Ecuador to disseminate the final results to community assemblies which is intended to increase knowledge, build capacity and foster community engagement to develop solutions to locally identified challenges.
Results
The CMGHE has produced research results with multiple academic and community outcomes summarized in Table 1 (Appendix A). Research from this project has documented local prevalence of infectious diseases and parasites; information on sexual health awareness, maternal & child health, intra-familial violence, household food security, and community agricultural practices, which have all increased community knowledge. Total academic outcomes include grant proposals, research bursaries, peer reviewed conference posters and presentations, published manuscripts, and prizes from McGill University for outstanding trainee projects, summarized in Table 1 (Appendix A).
Community outcomes following these results are varied. The early focus groups frequently led to wider discussions around the need for CHWs, which in turn led the McGill team to apply for funding for CHW training. Other outcomes include increased local capacity with community leaders involved in the research projects and now using focus groups to answer their own questions, new links with other local organisations (i.e., to reduce intra-familial violence and improve agricultural practices), increased skills and knowledge of CHWs, and developing new interventions to improve children’s nutrition.
Figure 1 depicts the flow of knowledge from the CMGHE program towards increased capacity both directly and through the CHW program. Trainees worked closely with CHWs as part of the project setup, execution and data dissemination process. As a result of this collaboration, the CMGHE increased community capacity by empowering CHWs to be more confident health advocates. CHWs have recently independently expanded their role in the communities by offering health messages during community gatherings. CHWs have implemented local health initiatives supported by health knowledge outputs of CMGHE research projects. CHWs have also expanded ownership of their learning by collaborating with the local hospital to address self-identified development needs.
Figure 1.

Increased capacity from CMGHE knowledge translation
Discussion
This report describes a structured approach to medical trainee global health education, using the principles of participatory research that benefit the local community, the trainee’s learning, and the larger research community. We believe this approach can offset the ethical and cultural safety dilemmas associated with lack of oversight and mentorship, unbalanced levels of responsibility and unidirectional benefits in favour of the visiting trainee.26,27
The participatory research framework to engage community responds to medical trainee interest in developing global health and research skills through cultural immersion and close mentorship. Trainees work closely with CHWs during project setup, execution and dissemination. There is mutual increased capacity for all parties involved as a result of the bidirectional flow of knowledge. In general, CHWs have expressed a greater ability to negotiate with the local hospital due to their gains in health care knowledge since the inception of the CMGHE program. The program is equity oriented with research and health-related learning for both trainees and the community. All trainees and many community members presented their research at academic conferences and were encouraged to develop manuscripts, resulting in publications.13,25 The community used the knowledge and was proactive in expanding upon health projects and pursuing new health projects; this is in line with participatory research principles including self-determination and knowledge translation.22,28 The participatory research produced its expected ripple effect, with the outcome of one phase becoming the context for the next.24 Over the years this generated increasingly complex CMGHE projects which spread to other communities, with similar increased capacity.24
Increased capacity occurred as a result of a strong partnership based on trust and mutual respect, essential components of participatory research.24 Testimony to the local acceptance of the partnership is the involvement of community members across all projects since 2008, maintaining a sustainable and bilateral relationship between the community and trainees.24 The trainee (AE) who initiated the academic community partnership is now a physician actively involved as a CMGHE supervisor and CHW instructor. Other trainees have remained involved with the CMGHE program for years, with some completing a second project, building on previous relationships.
A key limitation of the CMGHE format includes the risks inherent to the acquisition of cultural competence, of “othering” the host.29 Other limitations include trainee funding, proficiency in Spanish, and limited time during the two-month elective to grasp the cultural context and refine project tools.
Conclusion
This medical global health elective engages communities using participatory research. Subsequent studies could evaluate achievement of global health competencies to further validate using participatory research as an approach to global health education for medical trainees.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Lisa Graves, formerly of McGill University, for her key role as the first McGill supervisor for the first years of CMGHE. We are ever grateful to Dr. Byron Albuja at the Hospital San Luis De Otavalo (Otavalo, Ecuador) for his contributions to this elective, including supervision of medical trainees. We also thank every community member in Ecuador who has worked with us for their engagement and dedication.
Appendix A
Table 1.
CMGHE research results, community impacts and academic outcomes
| Year | Topic | Research Results | Immediate Community Outcomes | Academic Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Syphilis in prenatal patients |
|
|
|
| 2009 | Intestinal parasites in children |
|
|
|
| 2010 | Women’s views on cervical cancer screening |
|
|
|
| 2011 | Access to contraception |
|
|
|
| 2012 |
|
|
|
|
| 2013 | Child malnutrition, dietary diversity, household food security |
|
|
|
| 2014 |
|
|
|
|
| 2015 |
|
|
|
|
| 2016 | Dental health assessment |
|
|
|
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: All authors have no conflicts of interest due to financial and personal relationships that could potentially bias this work.
References
- 1.Imperato PJ. A third world international health elective for US medical students: the 25-year experience of the State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center. J Community Health. 2004;29(5):337-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Battat R, Seidman G, Chadi N, Chanda MY, Nehme J, Hulme J, Li A, Faridi N, Brewer TF. Global health competencies and approaches in medical education: a literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arthur MA, Battat R, Brewer TF. Teaching the basics: core competencies in global health. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25(2):347-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Izadnegahdar R, Correia S, Ohata B, Kittler A, ter Kuile S, Vaillancourt S, Saba N, Brewer TF. Global health in Canadian medical education: current practices and opportunities. Acad Med. 2008;83(2):192-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams B, Morrissey B, Goenka A, Magnus D, Allen S. Global child health competencies for paediatricians. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gladding S, Zink T, Howard C, Campagna A, Slusher T, John C. International electives at the University of Minnesota global pediatric residency program: opportunities for education in all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12(3):245-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Valani R, Sriharan A, Scolnik D. Integrating CanMEDS competencies into global health electives: an innovative elective program. CJEM. 2011;13(1):34-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Houpt ER, Pearson RD, Hall TL. Three domains of competency in global health education: recommendations for all medical students. Acad Med. 2007. March;82(3):222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miranda JJ, Garcia PJ, Lescano AG, Gotuzzo E, Garcia HH. Global health training--one way street? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84(3):506; author reply 507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siddharthan T, North CM, Attia EF, Christiani DC, Checkley W, West TE. Global Health Education in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowships. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(6):779-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bessette J, Camden C. How are Canadian universities training and supporting undergraduate medical, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students for global health experiences in international low-resource settings? Can J Public Health. 2016;107(4-5):e373-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Soni A, Fahey N, Jaffe A, Raithatha S, Raithatha N, Prabhakaran A, Simas TA, Byatt N, Vankar J, Chin M, Phatak AG. RAHI-SATHI Indo-U.S. Collaboration: The Evolution of a Trainee-Led Twinning Model in Global Health Into a Multidisciplinary Collaborative Program. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(1):152-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Evans AB. Improving upon the traditional international volunteer project: a participatory approach. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(4):364-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dodard M, Vulcain A, Fournier A. Project Medishare: a volunteer program in international health at the University of Miami. Acad Med. 2000;75(4):397-401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weir E. A summer in India. CMAJ. 1996;155(6):785-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thompson MJ, Huntington MK, Hunt DD, Pinsky LE, Brodie JJ. Educational effects of international health electives on US and Canadian medical students and residents: a literature review. Acad Med. 2003;78(3):342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Howard CR, Gladding SP, Kiguli S, Andrews JS, John CC. Development of a competency-based curriculum in global child health. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):521-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brascoupé S, Catherine Waters BA M. Cultural safety: Exploring the applicability of the concept of cultural safety to Aboriginal health and community wellness. Int J Indig Health. 2009;5(2):6. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cross T, Bazron B, Dennis K, Isaacs MR. Towards a culturally competent system of care: A Monograph of Effective Services For Minority Children Who Are Severely Emotionally Disturbed. 1989.
- 20.Macaulay AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, Gibson N. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):774-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada Royal Society of Canada; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cargo M, Mercer SL. The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice*. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, Sirett E, Wong G, Cargo M, Herbert CP, Seifer SD. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Cargo M, Green LW, Herbert CP, Pluye P. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dube A, Bartlett G, Morales J, Evans A, Doucet A, Caudarella A, Roy M, Farid D, Macaulay AC. The Chilcapamba–McGill Partnership: Exploring Access to Maternal and Newborn Care in Indigenous Communities of Ecuador. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9(3):327-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bhat SB. Ethical coherency when medical students work abroad. Lancet. 2008;372(9644):1133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chase J, Evert J. Global health training in graduate medical education: a guidebook. 2011.
- 28.Parry D, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, FCPC C. A guide to researcher and knowledge-user collaboration in health research. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pon G. Cultural competency as new racism: An ontology of forgetting. Journal of Progressive Human Services. 2009;20(1):59-71. [Google Scholar]
