Abstract
While sex differences in the peripheral immune response have been studied extensively, sex differences in the neuroimmune response, including glial activation and associated cytokine production in the brain, is a recently emerging field. Advances in our understanding of sex differences in the neuroimmune response have important implications for understanding how neural circuits are shaped during early brain development, how activation of the immune system may impact cognitive function and behavior, and how inflammation may be associated with the risk of mental health disorders that have strong sex-biases. The goal of this mini review is to highlight recent work in the field of sex differences in neuroimmune function, with a particular focus on how microglia function is influenced by age and sex hormone exposure.
Keywords: sex differences, microglia, cytokines, mental health, neurodevelopment, hormones
1. Introduction
Sex is a biological variable that significantly affects all aspects of an organism, including the immune system. An individual’s biological sex is determined as male or female by the differential presence of the sex chromosomes in each cell, the differentiation of the reproductive organs, and the subsequent production of sex-specific steroid hormones that organize the brain as male or female. Every cell has a sex; thus, biological sex differences can influence the physiological characteristics of the immune response that determine recognition, clearance, and transmission of pathogens, as well as the neuroimmune response to environmental insults. Gender, on the other hand, is an individual’s identity as male or female with reference to social and cultural differences, rather than biological differences, per se. Gender differences can influence behaviors that impact the risk of exposure to pathogens, can restrict or promote access to healthcare, and can influence other behaviors that affect the course or duration of an infection in men and women. While both sex and gender have a critical role in determining the neuroimmune response in males and females, the focus of this review will be on biological sex differences in the neuroimmune response and their influence on the brain and behavior throughout the lifespan.
2. Sex differences in microglia number and function in the developing brain influence sex differences in neural circuit formation
A critical period is defined as a period of development wherein a system maintains a heightened sensitivity to particular stimuli in order to develop in a specific manner. Some of the most compelling evidence for critical periods comes from the early studies of sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior [1]. These studies elegantly demonstrate the powerful role of sex steroid hormones during perinatal development in organizing the brain and behavior as either male or female. These experiments also reveal that, as sex hormones increase during puberty, the sexually dimorphic neural circuits that were organized during the critical period of development are “activated” inducing sex-specific behaviors. Since the time of this groundbreaking work, two lines of research have provided significant insight into the mechanisms responsible for sexual differentiation of neural circuits during the critical period of development. First, studies by Lenz and colleagues [2] demonstrated that the resident immune cells of the brain, microglia, are a fundamental mechanism for the development of sexually dimorphic neural circuits in the preoptic area (POA) that underlie sex-specific behaviors. Specifically, during the critical period of sexual differentiation, microglia within the POA release the immune signal, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which masculinizes neural circuits in the male POA and is necessary for the expression of male sex behavior later in life [2]. Furthermore, both estradiol and PGE2 masculinize the number and morphology of microglia in the female brain, and inhibition of microglial function prevents adult male sex behavior later in life [2]. These findings were the first to directly link sex differences in microglia number and morphology with the development of the sexually dimorphic neural circuits that underlie sex-specific reproductive behaviors. The second line of research has investigated how sex differences in microglia number and morphology influence the development of neural circuits in regions that do not (yet) have a clear role in sexually dimorphic behaviors. For example, neonatal male rats have significantly more microglia than females in the parietal cortex, CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus (DG), and amygdala [3,4]; and, compared to females, a larger percentage of microglia in males have an amoeboid morphology, indicating a more immature “phenotype” [3]. These sex differences in microglia number and morphology are evident on postnatal day 4 (P4) and are the result of increased testosterone-mediated cell proliferation in the male brain, and not the result of decreased cell survival in the female brain [4]. In fact, neonatal female rats treated with estradiol have increased microglia cell proliferation, similar to that seen in males [4], indicating that microglia can respond to sex steroid hormones to influence their number, and perhaps function, but it is not clear how this occurs. Several groups have shown that steroid hormone receptor expression is either extremely low or undetectable on microglia during early brain development [2,5,6], suggesting that cross-talk between microglia and other neural cells that express steroid hormone receptors may be necessary to produce sex differences in microglia number and phenotype in the developing brain. Similarly, exposure to Bisphenol A, a synthetic estrogen mimetic, from P6 to P12, increases the number of microglia in both male and female rat dentate gyrus and amygdala by P12 [7]. Thus, exposure to environmental factors that mimic sex steroid hormones, particularly testosterone (or estradiol), can also induce the process of brain masculinization by influencing the number of microglia in the developing brain.
In the cerebellum, Perez-Pouchoulen, VanRyzin, and McCarthy [8] showed that males have more microglia with very thin, long processes than females in the granule layer, even up until P17; however, there was no sex difference in the number of microglial phagocytic cups. Similarly, in the ventrolateral periaqueductal grey (vLPAG), Doyle, Eidson, Sinkiewicz, and Murphy [9] found that females had a greater number of microglia with thicker and more branches, but there was no sex difference in the total number of microglia. Thus, there are clear sex differences in microglia morphology in the cerebellum and vLPAG, but, unlike in the preoptic area, it is not clear yet how these sex differences in morphology translate to sex differences in the function of these cells, how they influence surrounding neural cells, or how they impact sex differences in behavior later in life. Conversely, in the neonatal hippocampus, Nelson and colleagues [4] found that female microglia phagocytose neural progenitor cells at higher rates than male microglia. Female microglia also had higher expression of genes related to phagocytic pathways compared to males; however, there were no sex differences in microglia morphology, indicating a clear sex difference in microglia function, without a discernable sex difference in cell morphology. These data highlight the enormous amount of heterogeneity in sex differences of microglial cells that is dependent upon the microenvironment of the brain region examined.
Collectively, these data suggest that there can be fundamental differences in the function of microglia between males and females, which can alter the way in which they interact with developing neural circuits in their unique microenvironments, but are independent (to some degree) from their function as traditional “immune cells”. While there is much that remains to be discovered, so far we know that microglia have an essential role in modulating sex differences in the development of neural circuits, including those underlying sex-specific behaviors and those that do not. Microglia are influenced by the differential hormonal milieu of the developing brain, impacting how they carry out these important developmental processes during the critical period of sexual differentiation of the brain and beyond [2,10]. Thus, drugs that deplete microglia or block microglial function during early brain development can have permanent sex-dependent effects on later-life sexual and social behaviors [2,11,12].
3. Sex differences in microglia: How is risk conferred following early-life immune activation?
During the early neonatal period (P4), males have more microglia with an amoeboid morphology than females in a number of brain regions important for cognition, memory, and emotion processing [3]. But, compared to males, female microglia show significant increases in the expression of a number of cytokines and chemokines including IL-10, IL-1f5, CCL22, CCR4, CXCL9, and IL-1β protein in many of these same regions at this same age [3]. These findings suggest that males and females have fundamental differences in microglia number and phenotype during early neonatal development, thus microglial activation could underlie sex differences in the vulnerability caused by early-life immune activation. Indeed, Bolton and colleagues [13] found that in utero exposure to air pollution delays the maturation of microglia resulting in an exaggerated response to subsequent lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment (i.e. increased number of microglia with thick, long processes) in juvenile males, but not females. These male mice also had decreased cortical volumes in the parietal cortex, which the authors suggest is the result of increased microglia-neuronal interactions in this region [13]. Furthermore, when in utero exposure to air pollution was paired with maternal stress, male offspring exhibit impaired hippocampal-dependent learning, increased expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β, and decreased expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 as adults [14] - effects that are not seen in females. These data support previous findings that increased IL-1β expression in the brain results in hippocampal-dependent learning deficits, specifically in adult males (reviewed in [15]). Stress-induced activation of inflammatory molecules within the placenta also occurs in a sex-dependent manner [16]. Following chronic maternal stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine expression is significantly increased in male, but not female fetuses. These male mice have altered dopamine receptor expression in the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, and as a result, exhibit hyperactivity – a behavioral effect that is ameliorated by maternal anti-inflammatory treatment [16]. Using a model of intrauterine inflammation, Makinson and colleagues [17] found that neonatal males exhibit increased expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, C1q, C3, and TGF-β, and have an exaggerated cytokine response to an immune challenge in adulthood – effects which are not seen in females. Collectively, these data indicate that males may be more vulnerable to early-life immune activation than females, possibly via sex differences in the function of microglia and their expression of pro-inflammatory molecules (e.g. males show exaggerated levels) during early brain development, leading to cognitive and behavioral deficits.
Stress induces pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in the brain by increasing microglial activation [18,19] and alters a number of biological processes involved in the neuroimmune response in a sex-dependent manner, including cell-to-cell communication [20], epigenetic regulation of gene expression [21], and the inflammatory response in the male and female hippocampus [22,23]. For example, following chronic prenatal stress, male mice show increased basal levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in the hippocampus as adults, an effect that is not seen in females [22,23]. Males exposed to prenatal stress also show increases in the number of microglia with an activated morphology (i.e. more and thicker branches) in the dentate gyrus in response to LPS as adults, whereas prenatal stress in females causes an increase in the basal levels of activated microglia, which is unaffected by treatment with LPS in adulthood [22,23]. However, after exposure to prenatal stress, both males and females show increased basal levels of IL-1β expression in the hippocampus as adults suggesting that at least some consequences of prenatal stress can be similar between males and females [22,23]. In a different model of early-life stress, following maternal separation (MS), male rats showed significant decreases in the number of parvalbumin-containing interneurons in the prefrontal cortex and increases in circulating levels of TNFα as adolescents – effects that were not seen in females [24]; however, both males and females had similar learning deficits on a cognitive task [24]. Similarly, prenatal alcohol exposure produces exaggerated expression of IL-1β and IL-6 in the hippocampus in response to an LPS immune challenge in adulthood, but to a significantly greater extent in males than females. But, both males and females show deficits in recognition memory as adults [25]. These data demonstrate that sex differences in the neuroimmune response can differ depending on the type of immune challenge and, while there can be sex differences in the neuroimmune response in the brain and periphery, this does not always reflect a sex difference in behavior. Therefore, some sex differences in the neuroimmune response may result in similar outcomes in males and females.
Still, there are many cases in which sex differences in the neuroimmune system do lead to different outcomes in males and females. Morphine, for example, is more effective at decreasing pain sensitivity in males compared to females. Doyle et al. [9] proposed that this sex difference in morphine effectiveness is driven by sex differences in microglia activity. As mentioned above, females have more microglia with an activated phenotype in the vlPAG compared to males, which may account for the attenuated response to morphine in females. Furthermore, blocking TLR4 receptor activation decreases the development of morphine tolerance in males, but not females. Sorge and colleagues [26] proposed that microglia might not even be required for pain processing in female mice at all. Instead, female mice may preferentially initiate changes in adaptive peripheral immune cells, as opposed to microglia, resulting in increased pain sensitivity following injury. Interestingly, however, in the absence of adaptive immune cells, females engage microglial pathways typically used by males to process pain sensitivity following injury [26].
These studies highlight that early-life exposure to a wide range of immune challenges, including early-life inflammation, stress, or drugs of abuse can have negative consequences for brain development and behavior that are likely driven by sex differences in microglia. The data so far indicate that, under certain circumstances, males may be uniquely vulnerable to the negative effects of early-life immune activation. However, in some cases, females are also vulnerable. Indeed, sex differences in the neuroimmune response have been shown to have an important role in the risk of stress- and anxiety-related mood disorders that are more common in women than in men [18]. In fact, ovarian hormones have been shown to alter expression of IL-1 [27] and, following early-life stress, cognitive impairments in adolescents can be predicted by sex and cytokines [28]. Thus, dysregulation of glial function caused by early-life immune activation, stress, or trauma may result in cognitive dysfunction in a sex-dependent manner, resulting in the sex-specific emergence of many disorders, including schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s Disease, or other types of dementia later in life [29]. The jury is still out on exactly how sex differences in the neuroimmune system confer sex differences in vulnerability to the negative consequences of early-life immune activation. Future research aimed at elucidating the role of microglia-neuronal communication in brain regions important for cognition, memory, and emotion processing in males and females are likely to provide significant advancements in our understanding of the relationship between sex differences in the neuroimmune response and the risk for mental health disorders.
4. Age as a determinant of sex differences in the neuroimmune response: What do we know about the role of microglia?
Age, much like sex, is a critical determinant for how immune activation influences sex differences in the immune response. As previously mentioned, Bilbo and colleagues found that neonatally-infected male rats showed cognitive deficits in adulthood following an immune challenge that occurred around the time of learning, an effect that is not seen in females [15]. Using this same model, Osborne and colleagues [30] determined that juvenile males and females do not yet show these cognitive deficits, which suggests that there may be something unique about the brain at this younger age that protects cognitive function from the detrimental effects of early-life immune activation in males. Moreover, these findings could inform our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for why females continue to be “protected” even in adulthood. Indeed, age is an important factor that influences sex differences in the neuroimmune response (for a recent review see [31]). Following peripheral immune activation, adult male mice have a greater febrile response than females, an effect that is caused by a sex difference in cytokine expression in the brain at this age [32,33] - higher levels of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), an endogenous anti-inflammatory cytokine that attenuates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, in the hypothalamus, attenuates the febrile response in adult female rats [32]. Adult male mice also display greater and more prolonged hypothermic responses, greater fluctuations in body temperature, and more pronounced sickness behavior following peripheral LPS administration compared to female mice, a sex difference that only becomes apparent after puberty [34]. Similarly, de Souza and colleagues [35] found that following maternal immune activation, the astroglial marker S100B was increased in the prefrontal cortex of adolescent male rats; but in adulthood, S100B was increased in males and females, suggesting that circulating steroid hormones activated in puberty can regulate the neuroimmune response in females to alter the activity of neuroimmune cells. Indeed, following a foot shock stressor, Arakawa and colleagues [27] found that regularly cycling females showed stress-induced increases in IL-1 expression in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus during the diestrous, proestrous, and estrous phases. No change in IL-1 expression was seen in the metestrous phase, however, estrogen receptor (ER)-β expression did increase [27]. Treatment with progesterone increased ER-β expression in ovariectomized females leading the authors to posit that high levels of progesterone during the metestrous phase sensitizes ER-β receptors, causing the observed attenuation of stress-induced increases IL-1 expression in the PVN [27].
Thus, every immune cell in the brain has the potential to respond differently to the same immunogenic challenge depending on the age of that cell and the associated hormonal milieu. Critical periods remain fundamental to our understanding of brain development and later-life behavior; however, recognizing that age is an important biological factor that influences sex differences in the neuroimmune response throughout the lifespan is necessary for elucidating how sex differences in neuroimmune function confer sex-specific vulnerability to early-life immune challenges.
6. Conclusions
The recent data summarized here only begin to elucidate the diverse mechanisms by which sex differences in microglia number and function may influence the establishment and maintenance of sex differences in the brain. What has been discovered to-date has been enormously instrumental in our understanding of how sex differences in the neuroimmune system can affect sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior and the vulnerability to early-life immune challenges, which increases the risk for mental health disorders. Future research must focus on understanding how early-life immune challenges may impact vulnerability to mental health disorders in a sex-dependent manner. Specifically, we still need to understand how sex influences microglia-neuronal interactions for the establishment and maintenance of healthy neural circuits and how these interactions may be perturbed following early-life immune challenge at various ages. This reserach will be crucial for advancing our understanding of how sex differences in the neuroimmune response may affect the brain and behavior across the lifespan.
Figure 1. Microglia can be influenced by endogenous and exogenous factors in a sex dependent manner.
Microglia initially colonize the brain early in development (embryonic day (E) 9-10 in rodents). During this time and into the postnatal weeks, microglia have an important role in forming neural circuits by initiating synapse formation, pruning aberrant synapses, and phagocytosing naturally dying cells. Around birth, testosterone production in males can influence the number and function of microglia in the developing brain, thus influencing many of these important neurodevelopmental processes. There are also many perinatal events that can program the function of microglia and later-life behavior in a sex-dependent manner. In general, males are more vulnerable to early-life insults including immune activation or stress. Later in life, microglia continue to have an important role in monitoring synapse function and formation, and thereby influencing cognitive function and behavior. During this time, microglia can be influenced by circulating sex steroid hormones, either testosterone in males, or estradiol and progesterone in females. Acute stress can also induce the activation of microglia in the brain via glucocorticoid secretion (CORT), and this can occur in a sex-dependent manner.
Highlights.
Sex differences in microglia number and function are evident early in the neonatal brain
Microglia have an important role in establishing sex-specific behaviors later in life.
Vulnerability to perinatal immune activation is dependent on sex difference in microglia
Age significantly influences sex differences in the expression of the neuroimmune response
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [NIH R21MH104280 and R01MH106553 to JMS] as well as a Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award to JMS.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
**Indicates a reference of special interest
- 1.McCarthy MM, Herold K, Stockman SL. Fast, furious and enduring: Sensitive versus critical periods in sexual differentiation of the brain. Physiol Behav. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lenz KM, Nugent BM, Haliyur R, McCarthy MM. Microglia Are Essential to Masculinization of Brain and Behavior. J Neurosci. 2013;33:2761–2772. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schwarz JM, Sholar PW, Bilbo SD. Sex differences in microglial colonization of the developing rat brain. J Neurochem. 2012;120:948–963. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07630.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4**.Nelson LH, Warden S, Lenz KM. Sex differences in microglial phagocytosis in the neonatal hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;64:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.03.010. The authors found that neonatal females have more microglia with phagocytic cups and higher expression of phagocytic pathway genes than males in the hippocampus. When treated with estradiol, female phagocytic microglia number could be reduced to that observed in males. This study is the first to show sex differences in microglia in the neonatal hippocampus during the critical period of sexual differentiation of the brain. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crain JM, Nikodemova M, Watters JJ. Microglia express distinct M1 and M2 phenotypic markers in the postnatal and adult central nervous system in male and female mice. J Neurosci Res. 2013;91:1143–1151. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turano A, Lawrence JH, Schwarz JM. Activation of neonatal microglia can be influenced by other neural cells. Neurosci Lett. 2017;657:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rebuli ME, Gibson P, Rhodes CL, Cushing BS, Patisaul HB. Sex differences in microglial colonization and vulnerabilities to endocrine disruption in the social brain. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016;238:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Perez-pouchoulen M, Vanryzin JW, Mccarthy MM. Morphological and Phagocytic Profile of Microglia in the Developing Rat Cerebellum 1, 2, 3. eNeuro. 2015;2:1–15. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0036-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doyle HH, Eidson LN, Sinkiewicz DM, Murphy AZ. Sex Differences in Microglia Activity within the Periaqueductal Gray of the Rat: A Potential Mechanism Driving the Dimorphic Effects of Morphine. J Neurosci. 2017;37:3202–3214. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2906-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loram LC, Sholar PW, Taylor FR, Wieseler J, Babb JA, Strand A, Berkelhammer D, Day HEW, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Sex and estradiol influence glial pro-inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37:1688–1699. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.VanRyzin JW, Yu SJ, Perez-Pouchoulen M, McCarthy MM. Temporary Depletion of Microglia during the Early Postnatal Period Induces Lasting Sex-Dependent and Sex-Independent Effects on Behavior in Rats. eNeuro. 2016;3:1–19. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0297-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nelson LH, Lenz KM. Microglia depletion in early life programs persistent changes in social, mood-related, and locomotor behavior in male and female rats. Behav Brain Res. 2017;316:279–293. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bolton JL, Marinero S, Hassanzadeh T, Natesan D, Le D, Belliveau C, Mason SN, Auten RL, Bilbo SD. Gestational exposure to air pollution alters cortical volume, microglial morphology, and microglia-neuron interactions in a sex-specific manner. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2017;9:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2017.00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bolton JL, Huff NC, Smith SH, Mason SN, Foster WM, Auten RL, Bilbo SD. Maternal stress and effects of prenatal air pollution on offspring mental health outcomes in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:1075–1082. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1306560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bilbo SD, Smith SH, Schwarz JM. A lifespan approach to neuroinflammatory and cognitive disorders: A critical role for glia. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012;7:24–41. doi: 10.1007/s11481-011-9299-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bronson SL, Bale TL. Prenatal stress-induced increases in placental inflammation and offspring hyperactivity are male-specific and ameliorated by maternal antiinflammatory treatment. Endocrinology. 2014;155:2635–2646. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17**.Makinson R, Lloyd K, Rayasam A, McKee S, Brown A, Barila G, Grissom N, George R, Marini M, Fabry Z, et al. Intrauterine inflammation induces sex-specific effects on neuroinflammation, white matter, and behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;66:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.07.016. These authors found that intrauterine inflammation altered fetal brain cytokine levels and cytokine response to adult LPS challenge in male offspring only; however, microglia number and anxiety-like behavior were altered in female offspring only. This work uses a translationally-relevant model to advance our understanding of the sex-specific, long-term effects of intrauterine inflammation on male and female offspring. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bekhbat M, Neigh GN. Sex differences in the neuro-immune consequences of stress: Focus on depression and anxiety. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;67:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bollinger J, Bergeon Burns C, Wellman C. Differential Effects of Stress on Microglial Cell Activation in Male and Female Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;52:95–121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wohleb ES, Delpech JC. Dynamic cross-talk between microglia and peripheral monocytes underlies stress-induced neuroinflammation and behavioral consequences. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2017;79:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Benoit JD, Rakic P, Frick KM. Prenatal stress induces spatial memory deficits and epigenetic changes in the hippocampus indicative of heterochromatin formation and reduced gene expression. Behav Brain Res. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.017.A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Diz-Chaves Y, Astiz M, Bellini MJ, Garcia-Segura LM. Prenatal stress increases the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and exacerbates the inflammatory response to LPS in the hippocampal formation of adult male mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;28:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diz-Chaves Y, Pernía O, Carrero P, Garcia-Segura LM. Prenatal stress causes alterations in the morphology of microglia and the inflammatory response of the hippocampus of adult female mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24**.do Prado CH, Narahari T, Holland FH, Lee H-N, Murthy SK, Brenhouse HC. Effects of early adolescent environmental enrichment on cognitive dysfunction, prefrontal cortex development, and inflammatory cytokines after early life stress. Dev Psychobiol. 2016;58:482–491. doi: 10.1002/dev.21390. The authors found that loss of parvalbumin-containing interneurons in the prefrontal cortex in adolescence following maternal separation is significantly correlated with poor performance on the win-shift task in males and females. This work suggests that maternal separation may cause cognitive dysfunction via abberant interneuron development that is similar in males and females and driven by neuroimmune activation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Terasaki LS, Schwarz JM. Effects of Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure during Early Gestation in Rats on Inflammation across the Maternal-Fetal-Immune Interface and Later-Life Immune Function in the Offspring. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016;11:680–692. doi: 10.1007/s11481-016-9691-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26**.Sorge RE, Mapplebeck JCS, Rosen S, Beggs S, Taves S, Alexander JK, Martin LJ, Austin J, Susana G, Chen D, et al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1081–1083. doi: 10.1038/nn.4053. The authors found that microglia are required for mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male, but not female mice. Instead, females use adpative immune cells. This work suggests that microglia-neuron signaling may not be necessary for chronic pain hypersensitivity in females and that males cannot be used as a proxy for females in pain research. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arakawa K, Arakawa H, Hueston CM, Deak T. Effects of the estrous cycle and ovarian hormones on central expression of interleukin-1 evoked by stress in female rats. Neuroendocrinology. 2014;100:162–177. doi: 10.1159/000368606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilson C, Agafonov RV, Hoemberger M, Kutter S, Zorba A, Halpin J, Buosi V, Otten R, Waterman D, Theobald DL, et al. Cognitive impairment effects of early life stress in adolescents can be predicted with early biomarkers: Impacts of sex, experience, and cytokines. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;347:882–886. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tronson NC, Collette KM. (Putative) sex differences in neuroimmune modulation of memory. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:472–486. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30**.Osborne BF, Caulfield JI, Solomotis SA, Schwarz JM. Neonatal infection produces significant changes in immune function with no associated learning deficits in juvenile rats. Dev Neurobiol. 2017;77:1221–1236. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22512. The authors demonstrate that neonatal infection casues increased IL-1β expression in the hippocampus of juvenile rats, exaggerated IL-1β expression in juvenile rats following a second immune challenge, but no assocaited hippocampal-dependent learning deficits. This is the first study to directly examine sex differences in the neuroimmune response using the two-hit model of infection. It is also the first to show that this same model of infection does not cause learning deficit in juveniles as it does in adults, but has wide spread effects on the developing peripheral immune system and brain. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kane L, Ismail N. Puberty as a vulnerable period to the effects of immune challenges: Focus on sex differences. Behav Brain Res. 2016;320:374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ashdown H, Poole S, Boksa P, Luheshi GN. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as a modulator of gender differences in the febrile response to lipopolysaccharide in rats. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;292:R1667–R1674. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Murakami N, Ono T. Sex-related differences in fever development of rats. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:R284–R289. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1987.252.2.R284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cai KC, van Mil S, Murray E, Mallet J-F, Matar C, Ismail N. Age and sex differences in immune response following LPS treatment in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;58:327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Souza DF, Wartchow KM, Lunardi PS, Brolese G, Tortorelli LS, Batassini C, Biasibetti R, Gonçalves C-A. Changes in Astroglial Markers in a Maternal Immune Activation Model of Schizophrenia in Wistar Rats are Dependent on Sex. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]