Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2018 May 21;55(8):2824–2832. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3219-6

Antioxidant properties and anti-quorum sensing potential of Carum copticum essential oil and phenolics against Chromobacterium violaceum

Mejdi Snoussi 1,, Emira Noumi 2, Rekha Punchappady-Devasya 3, Najla Trabelsi 4, Saptami Kanekar 3, Filomena Nazzaro 5, Florinda Fratianni 5, Guido Flamini 6, Vincenzo De Feo 7, Abdulbasit Al-Sieni 8
PMCID: PMC6045994  PMID: 30065392

Abstract

The chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of Carum copticum essential oil and its methanolic extract were investigated. Thirteen compounds were identified representing 99.3% of the total oil composition. Oxygenated monoterpenes (53.0%) dominated the C. copticum essential oil with high contents of thymol (51.7 ± 1.51%), p-cymene (26.9 ± 1.11%), γ-terpinene (16.7 ± 0.76%), and β-pinene (1.6 ± 0.15%). In the methanolic extract, the caffeic, gallic, chlorogenic, coumaric and ferulic acids, flavan-3-ols (catechin), flavone (hyperoside), and the flavonol quercetin were identified. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil and the organic extract was tested by disk diffusion and broth microdilution method. The essential oil was effective against the tested bacteria and yeast strains with the highest activity and the MICs and MBCs values were lower as compared to the methanolic extract. The essential oil showed anti-quorum sensing activity against Chromobacterium violaceum, and the IC50 value for violacein inhibition was 0.23 mg/ml. Both the essential oil and the methanolic extract also showed antioxidant activities. The results obtained highlight the potential use of C. copticum as a possible source of antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds to be used both as food flavor and as a broad spectrum antibiotic.

Keywords: Carum copticum, Essential oil, Antimicrobial activity, Antioxidant activity, Anti-quorum sensing

Introduction

Medicinal plants represent a natural source of phyto-compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, and have extensive application in the food industry. To prevent the spoilage due to foodborne pathogens, the use of plant-derived components are the safe alternative as compared to synthetically prepared antibiotics (Ríos and Recio 2005). The antibiotic production, biofilm formation and virulence properties of many pathogenic bacteria are controlled by a cell-to-cell signaling process mediated by low molecular weight diffusible signal molecules. This system is known as quorum sensing (QS) or cell-to-cell communication (Bhardwaj et al. 2013) and bacteria use QS system to sense and respond to their population by regulating the expression of a set of genes required for the bacterial physiology. Targeting QS system has attracted a significant attention as it does not impose the selection pressure that the conventional antibiotics exert. Plant metabolites including the essential oils display QS modulatory properties (Nazzaro et al. 2013).

Carum copticum (Family: Apiaceae) is an annual herbaceous flowering plant grown in arid, and semiarid regions including central Europe, Asia, India (in the states of Rajasthan Gujarat and West Bengal), Iran (eastern regions of Baluchistan), Iraq Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Egypt (Zahin et al. 2010). The fruit has an aromatic odor and a spicy taste, and is widely used as a spice in the curry powder (curry). The fruits are also used in the folk medicine due to their antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anti-vomiting, antiasthma, anti-spasmodic, antitussive, anti-flatulent, anti-arthritic, anti-hypertensive, bronchodilator and analgesic properties (Gilania et al. 2005). The composition of its essential oil is largely dependent on the geographic origin of the plant. The major constituents are carvacrol, thymol, p-cymene, or γ-terpinene (Mohagheghzadeh et al. 2007). Moreover, the fruit acetone extract has thymol, oleic acid, linoleic acid, γ-terpinene, p-cymene, palmitic acid, and xylene as main compounds. The methanol extract of the fruit contain saponins, flavonoids, tannins, phenols, alkaloids, anthraquinones, monoterpenoids, and thymol (Singh et al. 2004).

In the present work, we report the phytochemical compositions of the essential oil and the methanol extract obtained from C. copticum seeds and their biologically important activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-QS potential.

Materials and methods

Plant material and samples preparation

The dried seeds of C. copticum were purchased from a local market from Jeddah (KSA) in 2014. The plant was identified by Pr. Al-Sieni Abdulbasit, and a voucher specimen (SM-CC-01) was deposited in the CERTE (Technopark of Borj Cedria Tunisia). The volatile oil was obtained by hydrodistillation by using a Clevenger-type apparatus as previously described by Snoussi et al. (2015).

Analysis of the volatile oil

GC/EIMS analyses were performed as previously described (Flamini et al. 2007) with a Varian CP-3800 GC equipped with a HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; coating thickness 0.25 μm) and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass detector.

Identification of polyphenols in the methanolic extract

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analyses were carried out using an ACQUITY Ultra Performance LCTM system (Waters Milford MA, USA) linked simultaneously to a PDA 2996 photodiode array detector (Waters) as previously described by Fratianni et al. (2013).

Analysis of phenolic compounds and flavanoids in the methanol extract

Phenolic content was assayed using the Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) reagent following the slightly modified Singleton’s method (Dewanto et al. 2002). Total phenolic content was calculated from the calibration curve with gallic acid (0–400 µg/ml) and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry weight (mg GAE/g DW). Total flavonoids were measured according to Dewanto et al. (2002). Total flavonoids were estimated from the calibration curve using (+)-catechin (0–400 μg/ml) and expressed as mg (+)-catechin/g DW (mg CE/g DW). Proanthocyanidins were measured using the modified vanillin assay (Sun et al. 1998). The amount of total condensed tannins is expressed as mg (+)-catechin/g DW.

Antioxidant activities of the essential oil and the methanolic extract

Total antioxidant capacity was evaluated using the assay described by Prieto et al. (1999). This is based on the reduction of Mo(VI) to Mo(V) by the extract and sub-sequent formation of a green phosphate/Mo(V) complex at acidic pH. Gallic acid in the range of 0–500 µg/ml concentration was used for generating the calibration curve. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of all the test samples was measured according to the method described by Hanato et al. (1998). The radical scavenging activity was expressed as IC50 (µg/ml). The ability to scavenge the DPPH radical was calculated using the following Eq. (1):

DPPH scavenging effect(%)=A0-A1/A0×100 1

where A0 and A1 are respectively the absorbance of the control and sample at 30 min.

β-Carotene bleaching test was also used to estimate the antioxidant activity according to a previously described method (Koleva et al. (2002). The antioxidant activity (AA) of the extracts was evaluated in terms of β-carotene bleaching using the following formula (2):

AA%=A0-A1/A0×100 2

where A0 is the absorbance of the control at 0 min and A1 is the absorbance of the sample at 120 min. The results are expressed as IC50 values (μg/ml).

Screening for antimicrobial and antifungal activities

Disk diffusion assay was used for primary screening of antimicrobial activity, and a microdilution method for the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimal bactericidal/fungicidal concentration were used in the present study. Twenty four important microorganisms were used. These included nine Gram positive, sixteen Gram negative bacteria, and five Candida spp. strains. Pure bacterial colonies were used to prepare 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards in API suspension medium. The fungal suspensions in API medium were adjusted to 2 McFarland turbidity standards. The bacterial/yeast/fungal lawns were prepared using sterile swabs on freshly prepared agar plates. Sterile filter-paper disks (diameter 6 mm Biolife, Italy) impregnated with 10 µl of the crude methanolic extract (at 10, 30, and 50 mg/ml) or the essential oil (10 mg/disk), were placed on the agar plates and these Petri dishes were kept for 1 h at 4 °C. The antimicorbial activity was evaluated by measuring the diameter of growth inhibition zone around the disks after incubating at 37 °C for 24 h (48 h for the yeasts). The scheme proposed by Parveen et al. (2010) was used to interpret the antimicrobial activity based on the mean diameter of zone of inhibition (GIZ) obtained. The activity was interpreted as: low (GIZ: 1–6 mm), moderate (GIZ: 7–10 mm), high (GIZ: 11–15 mm), very high (GIZ: 16–20 mm), and no activity (GIZ = 0 mm). For comparison of the activity Ampicillin (10 mg/ml) and Amphotericin B (10 mg/ml) were used as positive controls.

To estimate the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), broth microdilution method was used. Twofold serial dilution starting from 25 mg/ml using 10% stock solution of the essential oil in DMSO was prepared in 96-well plates. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of compound capable of inhibiting the growth of the microorganisms. To determine the MBC and MFC values, 10 µl cultures from the wells with no visible growth were inoculated to appropriate agar medium to assess the growth if any and the concentration at which no growth was recorded as the MBC or the MFC. Ampicillin and Amphotericin B were used as reference. Interpretation of the activity based on the MIC was made according to Aligiannis et al. (2001): MIC 0.05–0.5 mg/ml (strong activity), 0.6–1.5 mg/ml (moderate activity), and MIC > 1.5 mg/ml (weak activity).

Screening for anti-quorum sensing (anti-QS) activities

Anti-QS activities were tested using two strains; Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 and C. violaceum CV026. The bacteria were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 32 °C for 24 h. For the C. violaceum CV026 agar plate bioassay, LB medium was supplemented with C6-HSL (Sigma). Inoculum was prepared in 10 ml LB broth incubated at 32 °C for 24 h. The culture turbidity was measured by recording the OD600 spectrophotometrically (UV-1800 Shimadzu Japan).

Evaluation of QS inhibition was tested by using the CV026 reporter strain. For this, 2 µl of essential oil or thymol was loaded to the sterile disks and placed on the surface of CV026 inoculated LB agar plates supplemented with C6-HSL (50 µl of 1 µg/ml stock). The plates were incubated upright for 24 h at 32 °C and zone of inhibition of QS was indicated detected by the presence of colourless but viable cells around the disks and the zone of growth inhibition was also recorded by clear zone around the disks.

For quantification of violacein inhibition, twofold serial dilutions of the essential oil were prepared in 96-well plates starting from 5 mg/ml in LB broth and inoculated with C. violaceum ATCC 12472. After incubation for 24 h at 32 °C, the growth in each well was recorded using a multimode plate reader. The MIC was calculated based on the OD600 readings of the treatments with respect to control. For quantification of violacein the contents of the wells were aspirated into Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged (8000 rpm 6 min) to collect cells. Violacein was extracted from the cells using water saturated n-butanol. The extracted violacein was separated from the cell debris by centrifugation and quantified by recording OD585 readings spectrophotometrically. Percentage inhibition of violacein by the essential oil was calculated with respect to control and 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) was recorded.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were carried out in triplicates and results were presented as the mean values ± standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests were used for evaluating the significance of the difference between means. Differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Essential oil composition

The phytochemical composition of the tested essential oil is summarized in Table 1. Altogether, 13 compounds were identified representing 99.3% of the total oil chemical composition. Oxygenated monoterpenes (53.0%) dominated the C. copticum essential oils with thymol (51.7 ± 1.51%) as the main representative. On the contrary, p-cymene (26.9 ± 1.11%), γ-terpinene (16.7 ± 0.76%), and β-pinene (1.6 ± 0.15%) were the most abundant monoterpene hydrocarbons identified.

Table 1.

Chemical composition of Carum copticum essential oil

Constituents l.r.i. % Mean ± SD
Monoterpene hydrocarbons (46.3%)
 α-Thujene 933 0.2 ± 0.06
 α-Pinene 941 0.2 ± 0.00
 β-Pinene 982 1.6 ± 0.15
 Myrcene 993 0.4 ± 0.10
 p-Cymene 1028 26.9 ± 1.11
 Limonene 1032 0.3 ± 0.10
 γ-Terpinene 1063 16.7 ± 0.76
Oxygenated monoterpenes (53.0%)
 Linalool 1101 0.1 ± 0.10
 4-Terpineol 1179 0.3 ± 0.06
 α-Terpineol 1191 0.1 ± 0.06
 Cumin aldehyde 1241 0.3 ± 0.15
 Thymol 1292 51.7 ± 1.51
 Carvacrol 1301 0.5 ± 0.10
Total identified 99.3

The data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3)

l.r.i. Linear Retention Index, SD standard deviation

Phytochemical analysis of the methanolic extract

The major compounds in the C. copticum methanolic extract are presented in the Fig. 1. The phenolic acids identified using the UPLC-DAD technique were; caffeic, gallic, chlorogenic, coumaric, and ferulic acids, the flavan-3-olcatechin, the flavone hyperoside, and the flavonol quercetin. Overall phenolic acids represented 40.88% of the total polyphenols identified by UPLC technique. The flavonoid hyperoside (11.034 mg/g) followed by quercetin (10.004 mg/g) were the two dominant phenolic compounds (26.25 and 23.80% of the total composition, respectively). While, gallic and chlorogenic acids represented 13.14 and 11.98%, respectively (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Ulra-performance liquid chromatogram of methanolic extract from seeds of Carum copticum. AU arbitrary units. 1, Gallic acid; 2, chlorogenic acid; 3, catechin; 4, caffeic acid; 5, coumaric acid; 6, hyperoside; 7: ferulic acid; 8, quercitin

Table 2.

Quali-quantitative analysis of polyphenols in the C. copticum methanolic extract by using the ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography

Polyphenols Retention time (min) Concentration (mg/g) %
Gallic acid 1.084 5.034 11.98
Chlorogenic acid 2.953 5.525 13.14
Catechin 3.307 3.814 9.07
Caffeic acid 3.833 1.496 3.56
Coumaric acid 5.009 1.419 3.38
Hyperoside 5.391 11.034 26.25
Ferulic acid 5.606 3.709 8.82
Quercetin 8.044 10.004 23.80

% percentage

Polyphenols in the methanol extract

Colorimetric quantification of total polyphenols showed the presence of 23.42 ± 2.5 mg of GAE/g DW of total polyphenols in the methanol extract. High concentrations of flavonoids (364.41 ± 6.74 mg EC/g DW) and tannins (336.33 ± 2.88 mg EC/g DW) were also found in C. copticum methanolic extract.

Antioxidant activity

The methanolic extract showed higher antioxidant capacities compared to the essential oil (Table 3). The methanol extract exhibited antioxidant activity of 34.45 ± 4.33 mg GAE/g DR. The The IC50 for DPPH radical scavenging by the methanolic extract was 30.33 ± 0.57 µg/ml, while the IC50 was 4.7-fold higher for the essential oil (143.33 ± 2.88 µg/ml). The EC50 for the reducing power were 466.66 ± 14.43 µg/ml and 1800 ± 115.47 µg/ml for the methanolic extract and essential oil respectively. The EC50 for ascorbic acid was 37.53 ± 0.39 µg/ml.

Table 3.

Phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and the methanolic extract of C. copticum seeds

Antioxidant activities tested Essential oil Methanolic extract Ascorbic acid BHA
TAA: (mg GAE/g DR) 34.45 ± 4.33
Total polyphenols: (mg GAE/g DR) 23.42 ± 2.5
Flavonoids: (mg EC/g DR) 364.41 ± 6.74
Tannins: (mg EC/g DR) 336.33 ± 2.88
DPPH: IC50 (μg/ml) 143.33 ± 2.88 30.33 ± 0.57
Reducing power: EC50 (μg/ml) 1800 ± 115.47 466.66 ± 14.43 37.53 ± 0.39
β-Carotene: PI (%) 113.96 ± 0.39 48.00 ± 0.50

TAA: total antioxidant activity is expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry residue; total polyphenols is expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry residue; tannins is expressed as mg (+)-catechin/g of dry residue; DPPH radical-scavenging activity is expressed as IC50 values (μg/ml); Reducing Power activity is expressed an EC50 values (µg/ml). β-carotene bleaching test is expressed as PI (%)

Antibacterial and antifungal activities

Data reported in Table 4 shows the results of antibacterial and antifungal activities of C. copticum essential oil and the methanolic extract as compared to the standard antimicrobial drugs (Ampicillin and Amphotericin B). For the essential oil, the GIZ varied significantly from 11.33 mm for K. pneumoniae to 52.33 mm for S. aureus ATCC 6816. These diameters were significantly higher as compared to the antibacterial drug tested (Ampicillin) and with respect to those obtained using the methanol extract. Overall, the activity of the essential oil was higher against Gram-positive bacteria (GIZ ranging between 35 and 52.33 mm) compared to Gram-negative strains (except E. coli ATCC 25922). Interestingly, the methanol extract exhibited a different sensitivity towards two different strains of V. alginolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus. Such variation was also shown for the two strains of E. coli with respect to the essential oil. Moreover, the two V. vulnificus strains showed a completely opposite response with the essential oil and the methanol extract.

Table 4.

Growth inhibitions zone, MIC and MBC/MFC values of C. copticum essentail oil and methanolic extract tested against Gram+ and Gram− bacteria, and yeasts

Microorganisms Essential oil Methanolic extract Ampicillin
GIZ ± SDa MICb MBCc GIZ ± SDa GIZ ± SD* MIC MBC
Bacteria
 A. viridans 43.33 ± 1.15g 0.024 0.39 11.67 ± 0.57h 14.67 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 E. coli 23.33 ± 0.57m 0.048 6.25 12.33 ± 0.57fgh 27.33 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 E. coli ATCC 25922 50.33 ± 0.57c 0.024 3.125 10.33 ± 0.57i 11.67 ± 0.57 0.023 3
 Shewanella putrefaciens 32.33 ± 0.57k 0.048 3.125 13.67 ± 0.57bcd 7.00 ± 0 0.023 0.75
 S. flexenerii ATCC 12022 42.67 ± 0.57f 0.024 3.125 14.00 ± 0bc 10.67 ± 0.57 0.023 0.093
 S. typhimirium ATCC 14028 24.33 ± 0.57m 0.096 3.125 12.33 ± 0.57fgh 17.67 ± 1.15 0.023 0.093
 E. faecalis ATCC 29212 35.00 ± 1i 0.048 6.25 12.33 ± 0.57fgh 13.67 ± 0.57 0.023 0.093
 V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802 34.67 ± 0.57ij 0.048 0.39 7.33 ± 0.57j 13.33 ± 0.57 0.011 3
 V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 37.00 ± 1h 0.048 0.78 15.67 ± 0.57a 12.33 ± 0.57 0.011 3
 V. vulnificus ATCC 27562 42.67 ± 1.15f 0.024 0.78 12.00 ± 0.57gh 30.33 ± 0.57 0.023 6
 V. alginolyticus ATCC 33787 37.67 ± 0.57h 0.048 0.78 13.33 ± 0.57cde 13.33 ± 0.57 0.023 6
 V. vulnificus ATCC 33149 37.67 ± 0.57h 0.048 3.125 13.33 ± 0.57cde 12.33 ± 0.57 0.046 1.5
 V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 43996 43.33 ± 0.57f 0.024 3.125 13.00 ± 0def 12.00 ± 0 0.011 6
 V. cholerae ATCC 9459 26.00 ± 1l 0.048 3.125 12.33 ± 0.57fgh 7.00 ± 0 0.011 12
 P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 20.00 ± 0n 0.048 6.25 12.67 ± 0.57efg 22.67 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 Serratia marscecens 32.00 ± 0k 0.048 3.125 13.00 ± 0def 13.67 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 M. luteus NCIMB 8166 50.33 ± 0.57c 0.024 3.125 12.67 ± 0.57efg 30.33 ± 0.57 0.023 0.375
 L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 45.67 ± 0.57e 0.024 3.125 13.33 ± 0.57cde 12.33 ± 0.57 0.023 0.093
 B. subtilis ATCC 6633 52.00 ± 0ab 0.024 6.25 12.00 ± 0gh 11.33 ± 0.57 0.011 3
 S. aureus MR (B2) 50.33 ± 0c 0.048 0.39 12.00 ± 0gh 16.33 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 S. aureus ATCC 6816 52.33 ± 0.57a 0.024 6.25 11.67 ± 0.57h 24.33 ± 0.57 0.011 0.093
 S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 41.00 ± 1g 0.048 3.125 13.33 ± 0.57cde 12.33 ± 0.57 0.011 0.187
 B. cereus 35.33 ± 0.57i 0.048 1.56 14.33 ± 0.57b 14.67 ± 0.57 0.023 1.5
 K. pneumoniae 11.33 ± 0.57o 0.096 6.25 12.33 ± 0.57fgh 17.33 ± 0.57 0.011 1.5
 P. mirabils 41.33 ± 0.57g 0.024 6.25 12.00 ± 0gh 25.67 ± 0.57 0.023 0.375
Yeasts Amphotericin B
GIZ ± SD* MIC MFC
 C. tropicalis 06-085 51.67 ± 0.57abc 0.024 1.56 12.33 ± 0.57a 6 ± 0 0.39 6.25
 C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 50.33 ± 0.57c 0.024 1.56 12.00 ± 0a 10.33 ± 0.57 0.195 0.39
 C. krusei ATCC 6258 32.33 ± 0.57k 0.048 3.125 12.67 ± 0.57a 12 ± 0 0.097 0.195
 C. glabrata ATCC 90030 50.33 ± 0.57c 0.024 3.125 13.00 ± 1a 14.33 ± 0.57 0.195 1.562
 C. guilliermondi 06-018 51.00 ± 1bc 0.024 1.56 9.67 ± 0.57b 21 ± 1 0.024 0.781
 C. albicans ATCC 2019 33.67 ± 0.57j 0.048 3.125 12.33 ± 0.57a 14.67 ± 0.57 0.024 0.781
 S. cerevisiae 11-161 48.67 ± 1.15d 0.024 3.125 12.33 ± 0.57a 8.67 ± 0.57 0.39 3.125

SD standard deviation

*Inhibition zone around the discs impregnated with Ampicillin or Amphotericin B (10 mg/ml) expressed as mean of three replicates (mm ± SD)

a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P = 0.05 based on Duncan's multiple range tests

The essential oil exhibited high activity also against the yeast strains tested with GIZ ranging from 32.33 to 51.67 mm. These diameters were significantly higher than those obtained for the methanol extract (9.67–12.67 mm) and the positive control (Amphotericin B: 6–14.67 mm). The MIC ranged from 0.024 to 0.048 mg/ml and the MFCs of the essential oil ranged from 1.56 to 3.125 mg/ml.

In this study, we also demonstrated the QS inhibitory potential C. copticum essential oil against the QS dependent phenotypic expression of violacein in C. violaceum. The anti-QS activity of the essential oil is shown in Fig. 2. The essential oil at 2 µl/disk showed anti-QS activity, while, the major component thymol did not show anti-QS activity in C. violaceum. However, the minor compounds such as linalool and cuminaldehyde showed anti-QS activity. Quantitative estimation on the effect of different concentration of essential oil on the growth of C. violaceum showed a MIC of 0.6 mg/ml and the IC50 value for violacein inhibition was 0.23 mg/ml.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Anti-quorum sensing activity of C. copticum essential oil tested on LB agar (a), microplate assay (b) and determination of MIC (c) and IC50 value for the violacein inhibition (d)

Discussion

It is clear from the results that the chemical composition of C. copticum volatile oil varies depending on the source of raw material. Thymol was identified as the main component in the essential oil from Iran (Kazemi et al. 2011). The main components of the oil of African and Iranian C. copticum oil are γ-terpinene and p-cymene. Kazemi et al. (2011) reported the identification of thymol (72.3%), terpinolene (13.12%), and o-cymene (11.97%) as the mains constituents of C. copticum. Additionally, Mahboubi and Kazempour (2011) reported varying concentrations of thymol (45.9%), γ-terpinene (20.6%), and o-cymene (19%) in the oil of C. copticum from Iran. According to Srivastava et al. (1999), the main constituents of the fruits oil of this species were p-cymene (41.98%), carvacrol (45.20%), and thymol (0.48%). These differences in essential oil profiles are the result of different geographical locations and cultivation techniques and also depend on the extracting methods.

The UPLC-DAD technique has been already applied to analyze other types of vegetables and herbs. Previous phytochemical studies of C. copticum fruits described many phyto-constituents like steroptin, cumene, thymine, tannins, and essential oils components such as thymol, γ-terpinene, p-cymene, and other bioactive molecules (Mohagheghzadeh et al. 2007). In 2010, Zahin and colleagues reported the identification of four components in the methanol extract of C. copticum seeds extract by using the GC–MS technique in particular thymol (95.14%), methyl ester (1.54%), cis, cis-linoleic acid (2.55%), and 3-nitrophthalic acid (0.77%) were characterized.

Our results on the polyphenols in the methanolic extract are in good agreement with those reported by Kazemi (2015), who reported a total phenolic content of 200.07 ± 37 mg GA/g of dry material and total flavonoid content of 94.07 ± 29 mg of rutin/g of dry aqueous extract of C. copticum plants at early flowering stage. These phenolic compounds are responsible for the taste, color, aroma, odor, and health-beneficial effects.

As reported by Kavoosi et al. (2013), the Carum oil (thymol chemotype) has a high radical scavenging capacity for ROS, RNS, H2O2, and TBARS with an IC50 values about 8.6 ± 1.4, 8.1 ± 1.5, 6.1 ± 0.95, and 6.8 ± 1.1 mg ascorbic acid per gram of carum oil respectively. The C. copticum essential oil also has broad range activity including the ability to reduce the stable DPPH and H2O2 radicals (Samojlik et al. 2010). The antioxidant and antiradical properties are attributed to the presence of compounds such as monoterpenes and oxygenated sesquiterpenes. The monoterpenes such as thymol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, and β-pinene can significantly add to the antioxidant activity of the C. copticum essential oil. Further, thymol has been reported to elicit several biological activities including the radical scavenging activity.

The antimicrobial potency of the extracts from Carum seeds differs among Gram- positive and Gram-negative and type of microorganism tested (bacteria or yeast). This let us to hypothesize that the action of the essential oil could be influenced among other things from the different structure of the microbial cell wall (Nazzaro et al. 2013). Likewise, the antibacterial activity of methanol extract differed depending on the strains tested. This suggests that the antimicrobial and antifungal activity tests must be carried out using two or more strains within each species (bacterial or fungal). C. copticum essential oil from different origins has been established with antibacterial activity against a large set of bacteria (Singh et al. 2002; Zomorodian et al. 2015) The antimicrobial activity of C. copticum essential oil can be associated to the high amount of the oxygenated monoterpene constituents especially thymol and its monoterpenes hydrocarbon precursors: p-cymene and γ-terpinene.

The hydrophobic molecules such as γ-terpinene and p-cymene thymol induce their antimicrobial activity by interacting with the lipid fraction of the microbial membrane leading to leakage of intracellular constituents (Trombetta et al. 2005). In combination with other oxygenated monoterpenes, p-cymene incorporated by the bacterial lipid bilayer facilitates the transport of the phenolic compounds across the bacteria cytoplasmic membrane (Juliano et al. 2000). This synergism between the major and the minor compounds can explain the stronger antibacterial activity of the whole essential oil as compared to the individual major components.

The essential oil also exhibited high activity against Candida spp. and S. cerevisiae strains. These activities were significantly higher than those obtained for the methanol extract and the antifungal compound tested (Amphotericin B). To inhibit the fungal growth, very low concentrations of the essential oil was sufficient. The MFCs s values of the essential oil was lower as compared to Amphotericin B. Kavoosi et al. (2013) demonstrated similar high antifungal activity of the thymol-rich C. copticum essential oil from Iran with MFCs of 5.6 ± 1.3 μg/ml against A. niger, and 8.8 ± 2.2 μg/ml against C. albicans strains.

Many plant essential oils have ability to modulate virulence properties controlled by the quorum sensing mechanisms in both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. The anti-quorum sensing activity of essential oils extracted from Cuminum cyminum, Zingiber officinale, Myristica fragrans, Syzygium aromaticum, Cinnamomum verum, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Curcuma longa against C. violaceum ATCC 12472 have been reported by Ganesh and Rai (2015) investigated. They also showed that all the tested essential oils exhibited antimicrobial activity and essential oils from C. cyminum, S. aromaticum, C. verum, R. officinalis, and C. longa inhibited the violacein production at different concentrations. Due to complex composition of the essential oils, they offer a large specter of QS inhibitors. The mechanisms of QS inhibition can be explained by (1) the competition between the essential oil components and the signal molecules to be bind to their respective receptors on the bacterial cell wall, (2) the degradation of the cell to cell signal molecules, and (3) the inhibition of reception of signal molecules. It is possible that plant essential oils exhibiting anti-QS activity might influence bacterial QS-controlled phenotypes by inhibiting AHL synthesis or through binding the AHL receptors. The ani-quorum sensing and antimicrobial activities of the C. copticum essential oil may have multiple benefits if used as valuable therapeutic entities.

Taken together, the results obtained in the present work suggest that the essential oil and the methanol extract of C. copticum exhibit a broad spectrum and a high antibacterial and antifungal activities along with antioxidant effect. Hence, C. copticum could represent a good source for food and drug preparations. The essential oil and the metabolites make C. copticum a versatile food and medicinal commodity. It can be used to develop new generation medicinal products with high efficacy and less adverse effects.

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the Tunisian Ministry of High Education and Scientific Research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aligiannis N, Kalpotzakis E, Mitaku S, Chinou IB. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of two Origanum species. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;40:4168–4170. doi: 10.1021/jf001494m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhardwaj AK, Vinothkumar K, Rajpara N. Bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors: attractive alternatives for control of infectious pathogens showing multiple drug resistance. Recent Pat Anti-Infect Drug Discov. 2013;8:68–83. doi: 10.2174/1574891X11308010012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom KK, Liu RH. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3010–3014. doi: 10.1021/jf0115589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flamini G, Cioni PL, Morelli I, Bader A. Essential oils of the aerial parts of three Salvia species from Jordan: Salvia lanigera, S. spinosa and S. syriaca. Food Chem. 2007;100(2):732–735. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fratianni F, Nazzaro F, Marandino A, et al. Biochemical composition antimicrobial activities and anti-quorum-sensing activities of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts from Hypericum connatum Lam (Guttiferae) J Med Food. 2013;16:454–459. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2012.0197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ganesh PS, Rai VR. Evaluation of anti-bacterial and anti-quorum sensing potential of essential oils extracted by supercritical CO2 method against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. TEOP. 2015;18(2):264–275. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilania AH, Jabeena Q, Ghayura MN, et al. Studies on the antihypertensive antispasmodic bronchodilator and hepatoprotective activities of the Carum copticum seed extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;98(1–2):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanato T, Kagawa H, Yasuhara T, Okuda T. Two new flavonoids and other constituents in licorice root: their relative astringency and radical scavenging effect. Chem Pharm Bull. 1998;36:1090–1097. doi: 10.1248/cpb.36.2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Juliano C, Mattana A, Usai M. Composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Thymus herba-barona Loisel growing wild in Sardinia. JEOR. 2000;12:516–522. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2000.9699578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kavoosi G, Tafsiry A, Abdam AS, Rowshan V. Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oils from Carum copticum seed and Ferula assafoetida Latex. J Food Sci. 2013;78(2):356–361. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kazemi M. Efficacy of chemically characterized Carum copticum essential oil as an antioxidant and lipid peroxidation inhibition. TJS. 2015;2:125–130. doi: 10.15547/tjs.2015.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kazemi OR, Behravan J, Ramezani M. Chemical composition antimicrobial activity and antiviral activity of essential oil of Carum copticum from Iran. AJP. 2011;1(2):83–90. [Google Scholar]
  13. Koleva II, Teris AB, Jozef PH, et al. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem Anal. 2002;13:8–17. doi: 10.1002/pca.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mahboubi M, Kazempour N. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Satureja hortensis and Trachyspermum copticum essential oil. IJM. 2011;3(4):194–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mohagheghzadeh A, Faridi P, Ghasemi Y. Carum copticum Benth & Hook essential oil chemotypes. Food Chem. 2007;100(3):1217–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, Coppola R. Quorum sensing and phytochemicals. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:12607–12619. doi: 10.3390/ijms140612607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parveen M, Ghalib RM, Khanam Z, Mehdi SH, Ali M. A novel antimicrobial agent from the leaves of Peltophorum vogelianum (Benth) Nat Prod Res. 2010;24:1268–1273. doi: 10.1080/14786410903387688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Prieto P, Pineda M, Aguilar M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem. 1999;269:337–341. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ríos JL, Recio MC. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100(1–2):80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Samojlik I, Lakic N, Mimica-Dukic N, Dakovic-Svajcer K, Bozin B. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective potential of essential oils of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and caraway (Carum carvi L.) (Apiaceae) Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:8848–8853. doi: 10.1021/jf101645n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh G, Kapoor IP, Pandy SK, et al. Studies on essential oils: part 10; antibacterial activity of volatile oils of some spices. Phytother Res. 2002;16:680–682. doi: 10.1002/ptr.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Singh G, Maurya S, Catalan C, de Lampasona MP. Chemical constituents antifungal and antioxidative effects of ajwain essentials oil and its acetone extract. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(11):3292–3296. doi: 10.1021/jf035211c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Snoussi M, Noumi E, Trabelsi N, et al. Mentha spicata essential oil: chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities against planktonic and biofilm cultures of Vibrio spp. strains. Molecules. 2015;20:14402–14424. doi: 10.3390/molecules200814402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Srivastava M, Baby P, Saxena A. GC-MS investigation and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Carum copticum Benth & Hook. Acta Aliment. 1999;28(3):291–295. doi: 10.1556/AAlim.28.1999.3.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun B, Ricardo da Silva J, Spranger I. Critical factors of the vanillin assay for catechins and proanthocyanidins. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:4267–4274. doi: 10.1021/jf980366j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Trombetta D, Castelli F, Sarpietro MG, Venuti V, Cristani M, Daniele C, Saija A, Mazzanti G, Bisignano G. Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2474–2478. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2474-2478.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zahin M, Ahmad I, Aqil F. Antioxidant and antimutagenic activity of Carum copticum fruit extracts. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010;24(4):1243–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zomorodian K, Ghadiri P, Saharkhiz MJ, et al. Antimicrobial activity of seven essential oils from iranian aromatic plants against common causes of oral infections. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(2):1–6. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES