Abstract
Background
Our study aimed to investigate the roles of autophagy against high glucose induced response in retinal pigment epithelium (ARPE-19 cells).
Methods
The morphological changes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in ARPE-19 cells under high glucose treatment were respectively detected using the transmission electron microscopy and flow cytometry. The expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L, LC3-I and LC3-II in ARPE-19 cells received high glucose treatment were measured by western blot after pretreatment of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), 3-methyladenine (3-MA), N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) or cyclosporin A (CsA) followed by high glucose treatment.
Results
ARPE-19 cells subjected to high glucose stress showed an obvious reduction in the LC3-I expression and significant increase in the number of autophagosomes, in the intracellular ROS level, and in the expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II (p < 0.05). Pretreatment with CCCP significantly reduced the LC3-I expression and increased the expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II (p < 0.05). ARPE-19 cells pretreated with CsA under high glucose stress showed markedly down-regulated expressions of Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L compared with the cells treated with high glucose (p < 0.05). Pretreatment of ARPE-19 cells with NAC or 3-MA under high glucose stress resulted in a marked reduction in the expression levels of PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the expression level of Parkin in the ARPE-19 cells pretreated with NAC under high glucose stress was comparable with that in the control cells.
Conclusion
Autophagy might have protective roles against high glucose induced injury in ARPE19 cells via regulating PINK1/Parkin pathway and BNIP3L.
Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy, Retinal pigment epithelium, Autophagy, High glucose
Background
The prevalence of diabetes is rising notably and the world prevalence of diabetes has been estimated to be 7.7%, affecting 439 million adults by 2030 [1, 2]. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), the most common visual complication of diabetes, is the leading cause of blindness among working-aged adults worldwide [3]. Previous individual studies have shown that the overall prevalence of DR was approximately 35% according to the clinical data from individuals with diabetes [4, 5].
DR is mainly caused by hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia and defects of insulin signaling pathways [6, 7]. Autophagy is a lysosomal degradation pathway that controls cellular bioenergetics and cytoplasmic quality [8]. Autophagy is regulated by multiple forms of cellular stress, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, nutrient or growth factor deprivation, hypoxia, cytotoxicity and infection [9, 10]. Mitophagy is a specialized process of autophagy that could reduce cellular damage and eliminate the need to support ineffective organelles by removing damaged mitochondria where increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated [11]. Accumulating data have suggested that autophagy have important effects on the pathobiology of DR [7, 12, 13].
Autophagy could protect against senescence and apoptosis of endothelial cells via renin–angiotensin system–mitochondrial damage induced by high glucose [14]. The microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) including cytosolic form (LC3-I) and membrane-bound lipidated form (LC3-II) has been commonly used to monitor autophagy [15]. It has been reported that Parkin (an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase encoded by the PARK2 gene) is selectively recruited to dysfunctional mitochondria by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) in mammalian cells and in human fibroblasts treated with mitochondrial uncoupler carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP, mitophagy activator) [16, 17]. Bcl-2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa-interacting protein 3-like protein (BNIP3L, also known as Nix) acted as a mitochondrial stress sensor can regulate mitophagy by promoting the release of Beclin1 from the Beclin1-Bcl2/Bcl-X complex [18, 19]. Therefore, the LC3-I, LC3-II, Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L might play important roles in autophagy.
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are the main cells of the retina that situate between the neural retina and the choriocapillaris forming the outer blood–retinal barrier (BRB), and RPE cells also play important roles in the physiopathology of DR [20]. Studies have shown that ER stress markers, phospho-eIF2α and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), were significantly up-regulated in human retinal capillary endothelial cells and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells cultured under high glucose condition, and in the retina of diabetic animal models [21–23]. Metabolic changes cause the RPE cells disorder, which lead to microvascular leakage in diabetes [24]. High glucose could contribute to the cell migration of RPE cells through increased oxidative stress and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) expression [25]. However, the molecular mechanisms of autophagy in the pathogenesis of DR still remain elusive. In this present study, we aimed to investigate the role of autophagy machinery in modulating RPE (ARPE-19 cells) under high glucose stress.
Methods
Cell culture
Human retinal pigment epithelium cell line, ARPE-19, was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Mantissa, VA, USA). The ARPE-19 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium mixed with Ham’s F-12 medium (DMEM/F12, Gibco, Grand Island, USA). Meanwhile, the medium was supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone, Logan, UT), 100 units/ml of penicillin and 100 mg/ml of streptomycin. All the ARPE-19 cells were cultured in a humidified incubator of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The ARPE-19 cells at exponential growth phase were digested with 0.25% trypsin for inoculation.
Cell treatment and cell viability assay
ARPE-19 cells were seeded at a concentration of 24,000 cells/well in 6 well culture dishes until reaching 70–80% confluent, and the serum-free DMEM/F-12 was added to the cells for 24 h. The solutions of mitophagy activator carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP; Abcanm, Cambridge, MA), autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA; Sigma, USA), ROS scavenger N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; Sigma, USA) or mitophagy inhibitor cyclosporin A (CsA; Sigma, USA) were prepared. Then, cells were incubated with d-glucose (5.5 mM [control], 30, 50 or 70 mM; Sigma, USA), NAC (0 [control], 1, 2 or 4 mM), CCCP (0 [control], 10, 20 or 30 mM;), CsA (0 [control], 5, 10 or 20 mM; Sigma, USA) or 3-MA (0 [control], 5, or 10 mM). The cell viability was measured after incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator of 5% CO2 for 48 h.
The concentrations of glucose, NAC, CCCP, CsA and 3-MA were selected according to the cell viability. ARPE-19 cells were seeded and incubated with 5.5 mM glucose (control group), high glucose (HG group) or the selected concentrations of small molecular drugs (NAC, CCCP, CsA or 3-MA) for 1 h. Afterwards, the high glucose solution was added to cells for an additional incubation for 48 h.
Cell viability was measured using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Roche, Mannheim, Germany). After the indicated treatments, the cells were washed and CCK-8 solution (10 μl, 1:100 dilution) was added to each well, followed by incubation for 3 h at 37 °C. The absorbance at the wavelength of 450 nm was determined by a microplate reader (Tecan, Mechelen, Belgium). Cell viability was calculated according to the following formula: cell viability (%) = (OD treatment/OD control) × 100%.
Morphological changes
After exposure to high glucose stress, morphological changes of ARPE-19 cells were detected using the transmission electron microscopy. ARPE-19 cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) overnight, and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for another 1 h. Samples were dehydrated with a graded series of ethanol solutions and embedded in araldite resin. Ultrathin sections (50–70 nm) were prepared using an ultramicrotome (Leica, Germany), stained with uranylacetate and lead citrate, and then scanned by transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-7500, Japan) at 80 kV. The cellular damage under high glucose stress was compared with that in the control group.
Examination of intracellular ROS generation
The intracellular ROS generation was measured using the fluorescent probe 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate oxidation (DCFH-DA, Sigma, USA) by flow cytometry [26]. Briefly, ARPE-19 cells were incubated with 10 mM DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. Cells were then washed with PBS and resuspended in PBS at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml. The untreated cells were served as the control. The levels of ROS were analyzed using flow cytometry at the excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 and 525 nm, respectively.
Western blot analysis
The total proteins were extracted from cells by Super RIPA Lysis Buffer with Benzonase Nuclease (HaiGene, Harbin, China). The protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Then, 30 μg of extracted protein was electrophoresed on the 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel at 150 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (PALL, Mexico) at 100 mA for 2 h. The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% skim milk powder for 1 h. After blocking, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies of Parkin (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), PINK1 (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), BNIP3L (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), LC3 (1:1000; CST, Boston, USA) and β-actin (1:2000; Genscript, Nanjing, China) at the recommended dilution. The membranes were then washed with TBS containing Tween 20 (TBST) and incubated with secondary antibodies (1:5000; HaiGene, Harbin, China) for 30 min at room temperature. The formed immunocomplex was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL; HaiGene, Harbin, China) and scanned by LAS-4000 Imaging System (FujiFilm, USA). The data were quantified using Image Pro-Plus and normalized by β-actin in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
All measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and tested for normality of distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Differences among multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
High glucose treatment
After the cells were exposured to high glucose for 48 h, the ARPE-19 cells treated with 50 mM (68.48 ± 4.57%) or 70 mM (36.69 ± 8.94%) d-glucose had significantly lower cell viability (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the cell viability between the cells treated with 30 mM d-glucose and the control cells (102.33 ± 4.23% vs 99.99 ± 7.05%; p > 0.05; Fig. 1). Therefore, the ARPE-19 cells were subjected to 30 mM d-glucose for high glucose treatment in this study.
Meanwhile, the viability of ARPE-19 cells incubated with 10 mM of CCCP (93.56 ± 3.00%), 1 mM of NAC (94.51 ± 2.19%), 10 mM of CsA (98.91 ± 7.99%) or 5 mM of 3-MA did not decrease significantly as compared to the control cells (p > 0.05; Fig. 1). In our following study, the ARPE-19 cells were pretreated with NAC (1 mM), CCCP (10 mM), CsA (10 mM) or 3-MA (5 mM) for 1 h before incubated with 30 mM high glucose for 48 h.
Structural changes and ROS generation induced by high glucose
The transmission electron microscopy revealed that the ARPE-19 cells incubated with normal glucose (5.5 mM; control) or high glucose (30 mM; HG) for 48 h had a significant increase in the number of double-membrane vacuoles, which were typical of autophagosomes (Fig. 2a). Meanwhile, the levels of intracellular ROS in the ARPE-19 cells under high glucose stress were markedly higher in comparison with those of the control cells (Fig. 2b).
Pretreatment with CCCP under high glucose stress
The expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II in the ARPE-19 cells under high glucose stress were significantly higher than those in the control cells (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). Meanwhile, the LC3-I level of ARPE-19 cells cultured under high glucose stress was obviously reduced, comparing with the control cells (p < 0.05).
After the ARPE-19 cells were pretreated with CCCP, the expressions of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II were significantly elevated in cells under high glucose stress (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). Moreover, the expression of LC3-I was obviously lower in the cells pretreated with CCCP under high glucose stress than the cells under high glucose stress without pretreatment (p < 0.05).
Pretreatment with CsA, 3-MA or NAC under high glucose stress
Compared with the ARPE-19 cells exposed to normal glucose, high glucose treatment caused a significant increase in the expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II (p < 0.05; Figs. 4, 5). Meanwhile, high glucose stress leaded to a reduction in LC3-I expression in ARPE-19 cells compared with the control cells (p < 0.05).
The ARPE-19 cells pretreated with CsA under high glucose stress showed markedly down-regulated expressions of Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L compared with the cells under high glucose stress without pretreatment (p < 0.05; Fig. 4). The CsA, an inhibitor of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore [27], might blocked the high glucose induced mitophagy and PINK1/Parkin pathway. The ARPE-19 cells pretreated with 3-MA under high glucose stress showed markedly up-regulated expression of Parkin and down-regulated expressions of PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II compared with the cells under high glucose stress without pretreatment (p < 0.05; Fig. 5). After the ARPE-19 cells were pretreated with NAC, the expression levels of PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II were significantly reduced under high glucose stress (p < 0.05; Fig. 6). The ARPE-19 cells treated with high glucose or NAC showed an obvious reduction in the Parkin expression (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed in Parkin expression between the ARPE-19 cells treated with NAC under high glucose stress and control cells (p > 0.05; Fig. 6).
Discussion
Hyperglycemia which is responsible for the initiation and progression of DR is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus [28]. In the present study, the number of autophagosomes, intracellular ROS level and expression of LC3-II were markedly increased in the ARPE-19 cells treated with high glucose. Meanwhile, ARPE-19 cells showed an obvious reduction in the LC3-I levels under high glucose stress. LC3-II is formed via phosphatidylethanolamine conjugation of LC3-I representing on isolation membranes and autophagosomes [29]. Detecting the conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II is used for monitoring the number of autophagosomes and autophagic flux [30]. Therefore, our data suggested that high glucose caused the autophagy in ARPE-19 cells. In our further study, the ARPE-19 cells will be treated by Bafilomycin A1, an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, to further interpret the decreased amounts of LC3-I. The ARPE-19 cells treated with high glucose showed markedly increased generation of autophagosome, down-regulated expression of p62 and enhanced LC3-II conversion [31]. The expression levels of p62/SQSTM1 or optineurin will be measured to further interpret the increase in LC3-II and autophagosomes in our next study.
Hyperglycemia induced oxidative stress is implicated in the development of DR, and it has been clarified that overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) in endothelium could prevent DR according to the study of diabetic transgenic mice [32]. In our study, the intracellular ROS levels in ARPE-19 cells were significantly elevated in response to high glucose stress. The expressions of PINK1 and BNIP3L were also obviously increased in the ARPE-19 cells under high glucose stress comparing with the control cells. It has been reported that BNIP3L could promote CCCP-induced mitochondrial depolarization and ROS generation to inhibit rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and activate autophagy [33]. In our study, down-regulated expression of LC3-I and up-regulated expression levels of Parkin, PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II were observed in RPE-19 cells pretreated with mitophagy activator CCCP under high glucose stress. The rapid accumulation of PINK1 on the outer mitochondrial membranes caused by polarized mitochondria (loss of mitochondrial membrane potential) can lead to the translocation of Parkin to mitochondria [34, 35]. Then, autophagic degradation of the dysfunctional mitochondrion caused by the recruited Parkin ubiquitinating mitochondrial proteins in the outer membrane indicates PINK1 acts as upstream of Parkin to regulate mitochondrial function and integrity [36, 37]. Therefore, it could be concluded that CCCP might activate the mitophagy in ARPE-19 cells via up-regulating the Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L. However, this should be further validated by immunofluorescence for o-localization of mitochondrial ETC complex protein COXIV (cytochrome c oxidase, subunit IV, a mitochondrial marker) with Parkin and Lamp 2a.
Inhibition of autophagy in R28 retinal neuronal cells with chloroquine significantly exacerbated the expressions of apoptotic proteins and apoptotic cell death during metabolic stress, suggesting autophagy modulation might be a novel therapeutic strategy for the prevention of neurodegeneration in DR [38]. Cyclosporin A, an immunosuppressive undecapeptide, blocks the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) and prevents mitochondrial depolarization after autophagic stimulation [39]. In our study, the ARPE-19 cells pretreated with CsA under high glucose stress showed markedly down-regulated expressions of Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L compared with the cells under high glucose stress without pretreatment. We also found that pretreatment of ARPE-19 cells with NAC under high glucose stress could result in obviously reduced expression levels of PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II. Meanwhile, the Parkin expression level in the ARPE-19 cells treated with NAC under high glucose stress was comparable with that in the control cells. Endoplasmic reticulum stress can be activated by high glucose induced accumulation of ROS, and autophagy regulated by ER stress is critical for the maintenance of normal physiological functions in retinal pigment epithelium [31]. Thus, interruption of ER stress signaling via NAC to scavenge ROS can lead to the inhibition of autophagy in ARPE-19 cells. In the study of Du et al. [40], the generation of ROS was increased in the retina vascular endothelial cells under the high glucose stress and decreased in the cells under high glucose stress pretreated with NAC. Increased autophagy has been observed in ARPE-19 cells under high glucose stress, and inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA (a type III PI3 kinase complex inhibitor) could induce interleukin (IL)-1β release via ROS mediated pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome [24]. In our study, suppression of autophagy in ARPE-19 cells under high glucose stress by 3-MA could cause a marked reduction in the expression levels of PINK1, BNIP3L and LC3-II.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study showed autophagy might have protective roles against high glucose induced injury in ARPE19 cells via regulating PINK1/Parkin pathway and BNIP3L. The autophagy in ARPE-19 cells was enhanced under high glucose stress. Activation of autophagy by pretreatment of CCCP increased the expression levels of Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L. Inhibition of autophagy by pretreatment of CsA, NAC or 3-MA under high glucose stress caused markedly down-regulated expressions of Parkin, PINK1 and BNIP3L. Our present study might be helpful for understanding the molecular mechanisms of DR.
Authors’ contributions
CCH and HL participated in the design of this study, and they both performed the statistical analysis. JYX, HMY and XDW carried out the study and collected important background information. XMZ drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by The scientific research of Health and Family Planning Commission in Heilongjiang Province (Grant Number: 2017-138).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The raw data were collected and analyzed by the Authors, and are not ready to share their data because the data have not been published.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Funding
None.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Chengchi Huang, Email: 15858831577@163.com.
Hong Lu, Email: luhongmail@126.com.
Junyu Xu, Email: 309029376@qq.com.
Hongmin Yu, Email: 1300419558@qq.com.
Xiaodan Wang, Email: wangxd139521@sina.com.
Xiaomei Zhang, Phone: +86-0451-85553922, Email: zhangzhshsd@hotmail.com.
References
- 1.Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diab Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–1101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14(4):179–183. doi: 10.1080/09286580701396720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diab Care. 2012;35(3):556–564. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, Cotch MF, Folsom AR, Klein BE, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(3):446–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ting DS, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(4):260–277. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rosa MD, Distefano G, Gagliano C, Rusciano D, Malaguarnera L. Autophagy in diabetic retinopathy. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(8):810–825. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666160321122900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147(4):728–741. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol Cell. 2010;40(2):280–293. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ciechomska IA, Gabrusiewicz K, Szczepankiewicz AA, Kaminska B. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers autophagy in malignant glioma cells undergoing cyclosporine a-induced cell death. Oncogene. 2013;32(12):1518–1529. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldman SJ, Taylor R, Zhang Y, Jin S. Autophagy and the degradation of mitochondria. Mitochondrion. 2010;10(4):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lin WJ, Kuang HY. Oxidative stress induces autophagy in response to multiple noxious stimuli in retinal ganglion cells. Autophagy. 2014;10(10):1692–1701. doi: 10.4161/auto.36076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lopes de Faria JM, Duarte DA, Montemurro C, Papadimitriou A, Consonni SR, Lopes de Faria JB. Defective autophagy in diabetic retinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(10):4356–4366. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen F, Chen B, Xiao FQ, Wu YT, Wang RH, Sun ZW, et al. Autophagy protects against senescence and apoptosis via the RAS-mitochondria in high-glucose-induced endothelial cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33(4):1058–1074. doi: 10.1159/000358676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy. 2007;3(6):542–545. doi: 10.4161/auto.4600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rakovic A, Grunewald A, Kottwitz J, Bruggemann N, Pramstaller PP, Lohmann K, et al. Mutations in PINK1 and Parkin impair ubiquitination of Mitofusins in human fibroblasts. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e16746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(5):795–803. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang J, Loyd MR, Randall MS, Waddell MB, Kriwacki RW, Ney PA. A short linear motif in BNIP3L (NIX) mediates mitochondrial clearance in reticulocytes. Autophagy. 2012;8(9):1325–1332. doi: 10.4161/auto.20764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang J, Ney PA. Mechanisms and biology of B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2/adenovirus E1B interacting protein 3 and Nip-like protein X. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(10):1959–1969. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Simo R, Villarroel M, Corraliza L, Hernandez C, Garcia-Ramirez M. The retinal pigment epithelium: something more than a constituent of the blood–retinal barrier—implications for the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;190724(10):17. doi: 10.1155/2010/190724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li B, Wang HS, Li GG, Zhao MJ, Zhao MH. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the early stage of diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 2011;48(2):103–111. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0170-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miranda S, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Garcia-Ramirez M, Revuelta-Cervantes J, Hernandez C, Simo R, et al. Beneficial effects of fenofibrate in retinal pigment epithelium by the modulation of stress and survival signaling under diabetic conditions. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(6):2352–2362. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li J, Wang JJ, Yu Q, Wang M, Zhang SX. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is implicated in retinal inflammation and diabetic retinopathy. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(9):1521–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shi H, Zhang Z, Wang X, Li R, Hou W, Bi W, et al. Inhibition of autophagy induces IL-1β release from ARPE-19 cells via ROS mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation under high glucose stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;463(4):1071–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Farnoodian M, Halbach C, Slinger C, Pattnaik BR, Sorenson CM, Sheibani N. High glucose promotes the migration of retinal pigment epithelial cells through increased oxidative stress and PEDF expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2016;311(3):C418–C436. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00001.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eruslanov E, Kusmartsev S. Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;594:57–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wei X, Qi Y, Zhang X, Gu X, Cai H, Yang J, et al. ROS act as an upstream signal to mediate cadmium-induced mitophagy in mouse brain. Neurotoxicology. 2015;46:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.He F, Xia X, Wu XF, Yu XQ, Huang FX. Diabetic retinopathy in predicting diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2013;56(3):457–466. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2796-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, et al. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000;19(21):5720–5728. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell. 2010;140(3):313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yao J, Tao ZF, Li CP, Li XM, Cao GF, Jiang Q, et al. Regulation of autophagy by high glucose in human retinal pigment epithelium. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33(1):107–116. doi: 10.1159/000356654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Araki E, Nishikawa T. Oxidative stress: a cause and therapeutic target of diabetic complications. J Diab Investig. 2010;1(3):90–96. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00013.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ding WX, Ni HM, Li M, Liao Y, Chen X, Stolz DB, et al. Nix is critical to two distinct phases of mitophagy, reactive oxygen species-mediated autophagy induction and Parkin-ubiquitin-p62-mediated mitochondrial priming. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(36):27879–27890. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.119537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Narendra DP, Jin SM, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Gautier CA, Shen J, et al. PINK1 is selectively stabilized on impaired mitochondria to activate Parkin. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(1):1000298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vives-Bauza C, Zhou C, Huang Y, Cui M, de Vries RL, Kim J, et al. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(1):378–383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911187107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang X, Winter D, Ashrafi G, Schlehe J, Wong YL, Selkoe D, et al. PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell. 2011;147(4):893–906. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chan NC, Salazar AM, Pham AH, Sweredoski MJ, Kolawa NJ, Graham RL, et al. Broad activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by Parkin is critical for mitophagy. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(9):1726–1737. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arnold E, Fort P, Abcouwer S, Gardner T. Role of autophagy in diabetic retinopathy and metabolic stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(15):3688. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zamzami N, Marchetti P, Castedo M, Hirsch T, Susin SA, Masse B, et al. Inhibitors of permeability transition interfere with the disruption of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential during apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 1996;384(1):53–57. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00280-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Du JH, Li X, Li R, Cheng BX, Kuerbanjiang M, Ma L. Role of autophagy in angiogenesis induced by a high-glucose condition in RF/6A cells. Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(2):85–95. doi: 10.1159/000455270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data were collected and analyzed by the Authors, and are not ready to share their data because the data have not been published.