Skip to main content
Cell Discovery logoLink to Cell Discovery
. 2018 Jul 17;4:35. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0037-y

Inward-facing conformation of l-ascorbate transporter suggests an elevator mechanism

Ping Luo 1,#, Shuliu Dai 1,#, Jianwei Zeng 1, Jinsong Duan 1, Hui Shi 1, Jiawei Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC6048161  PMID: 30038796

Abstract

Various bacteria can ferment vitamin C (l-ascorbate) under anaerobic conditions via the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS). The PTSasc system is composed of two soluble energy-coupling proteins (EI and HPr) and an enzyme II complex (EIIA, EIIB, and EIIC) for the anaerobic uptake of ascorbate and its phosphorylation to l-ascorbate 6-phosphate in vivo. Crystal structures of the ascorbate-bound EIIC component from Escherichia coli are available in outward-open and occluded conformations, suggesting a possible elevator mechanism of membrane transport. Despite these advances, it remains unclear how EIIC actually transports the substrate across the membrane and interacts with EIIB, which transfers its phosphate group to the EIIC-embedding ascorbate. Here, we present the crystal structure of the EIICasc component from Pasteurella multocida in the inward-facing conformation. By comparing three conformational states, we confirmed the original proposed model: the ascorbate translocation can be achieved by a rigid-body movement of the substrate-binding core domain relative to the V motif domain, which brings along the transmembrane helices TM2 and TM7 of the V motif domain to undergo a winding at the pivotal positions. Together with an in vivo transport assay, we completed the picture of the transport cycle of the ascorbate superfamily of membrane-spanning EIIC components of the PTS system.

Introduction

The phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), which catalyzes PEP-dependent group translocation, is used by bacteria for sugar uptake where the source of energy is from phosphoenolpyruvate1,2. The PTS includes an integral membrane transporter protein IIC, an enzyme IIB-like protein and an enzyme IIA-like protein forming an enzyme II (EII) complex, each of which is sugar specific3. All three proteins as well as the energy-coupling PTS proteins that are not specific for the transported sugar, enzyme I (EI) and the histidine phosphocarrier protein (HPr), are required for sugar uptake and its phosphorylation in vivo1,35. The EII components of the PTS can also fuse to each other forming multifunctional polypeptides made up of two or more domains5. The Escherichia coli K12 chromosome encodes 21 different PTS carbohydrate transporters3. The unusual mechanism of PTS-mediated sugar uptake tightly couples sugar transport to sugar phosphorylation in a “group translocation” process6. In the first step, EI of the PTS is autophosphorylated with a phosphate group originating from phosphoenolpyruvate. Then the phosphate group is transferred sequentially from EI to HPr, to EIIA, and to EIIB. Finally, EIIB transfers its phosphate group to the transported sugar bound to the membrane-spanning EIIC, and the phosphorylated sugar is then released into the cytoplasm3,5,7. The bacterial PTSs are classified into four evolutionary distinct (super) families according to the TCDB website (http://www.tcdb.org/superfamily.php)3,6,8: (i) the glucose/fructose/lactose (GFL) superfamily, which is the largest one and is subdivided into four families (TC# 4.A.1–4.A.4), (ii) the ascorbate/galactitol (AG) superfamily, which consists of two families (TC# 4.A.5 and 4.A.7), (iii) the mannose family (TC# 4.A.6), and (iv) the non-transporting dihydroxyacetone family.

In earlier reports, three crystal structures and one 2D electron crystallographic projection structure of PTS transporters had been solved: the ChbC diacetylchitobiose group translocator in the inward-facing occluded conformation9 and maltose transporter MalT in the outward-facing occluded conformation10 of the GFL superfamily, and the UlaA l-ascorbate group translocator in both outward-facing and occluded conformations11 of the AG superfamily and the glucose-specific EIIC transport domain of the GFL superfamily from E. coli solved by electron crystallography of tubular crystals in an inward-facing conformation12. EIIC proteins are thought to use the elevator mechanism1316, an implementation of the alternate access mechanism17, to transport sugars across the membrane18. However, there has been no inward-facing 3D structure of EIIC in the AG superfamily available to validate the proposed elevator mechanism.

Vitamin C (or l-ascorbic acid, or simply ascorbate) can be fermented by enteric bacteria, e.g., E. coli, via a PTS-AG system19. Two divergently transcribed operons, ulaABCDEF/sgaTBAHUE and ulaG located upstream of the ula operon (previously designated the sga operon), encode catabolic enzymes for the utilization of l-ascorbate, allowing the uptake of vitamin C and its conversion to d-xylulose 5-phosphate and CO220. UlaA, UlaB and UlaC are the components of the l-ascorbate PTS EII complex21 (Fig. 1a), involve in the uptake of vitamin C and its phosphorylation to l-ascorbate 6-phosphate8. UlaA from Escherichia coli in both outward-open and occluded conformations and homologs of soluble UlaB (PtxB; PDBID: 3CZC) and UlaC (PtxA; PDBID: 3BJV) from Streptococcus mutans have been solved by X-ray crystallography11,22 (Fig. 1a). Availability of the inward-facing structure of UlaA would facilitate a better understanding of the elevator mechanism of UlaA-mediated vitamin C transport, completing the transport cycle in the greater PTS-AG superfamily. To obtain the inward-facing conformation, we screened different possible mis-sense mutations of UlaA from Escherichia coli (ecUlaA) (e.g., G58A, G286A, and G58A/G286A)23, or homologs from other bacteria19, e.g., V. cholera, P. multocida, and M. pulmonis, in which cytoplasmic UlaB is fused to the C-terminus of the UlaA domain (Fig. 1a). UlaA from Pasteurella multocida (pmUlaA) was finally crystalized after being proteolyzed with trypsin from the wild-type pmUlaAB protein, with a best diffraction of 3.35 Å (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 1. Domain composition of l-ascorbate PTS enzyme II complex and overall structure of pmUlaA.

Fig. 1

a In the wild type PTS EII complex from Pasteurella multocida, pmUlaB is fused C-terminal to pmUlaA to form a single peptide. His68 of UlaC accepts the phosphate group transferred from PEP, EI, HPr sequentially, and then gives it to Cys506/Cys9 of UlaB. Ultimately, UlaB transfers its phosphate group to the l-ascorbate. Residue 475, indicated by the scissor, was the proteolytic site with trypsin. b The structure of the pmUlaA homodimer is shown in cartoon and electron potential surface representations as viewed within the plane of the membrane. pmUlaA is spatially organized into V motif 1 (cyan), core 1 (yellow), V motif 2 (magenta), core 2 (orange) and TM11 (gray) subdomains. Vitamin C is shown in ball-and-stick representation. The spatial position of pmUlaA inside the lipid bilayer is predicted by the PPM server24. c View from the extracellular side of the pmUlaA homodimer. One protomer is shown in rainbow colors

Results

Structure of pmUlaA

pmUlaA shares 63% sequence identity with ecUlaA. Both proteins have a similar number of residues, with pmUlaA containing a 5-aa insertion (after 413) and a single residue deletion at position 433 (Supplementary Figure S1). The protein crystallized as a homodimer in the asymmetric unit, and the structure was solved using molecular replacement with the ecUlaA’s core domain (PDB ID: 4PR911) as the initial model (Supplementary Figure S2). The final model for one protomer contained residues 37 to 460 as well as a molecule of vitamin C. According to the high sequence similarity between pmUlaA and ecUlaA, a nomenclature has been adopted from ecUlaA for the structural components with 11 TMs (although the closely related protein VpeC (TC# 4.A.7.1.2) apparently lacks the 11th TM), four hairpin structures (HP1–4) and three horizontal amphipathic helix segments (AH1–3; Supplementary Figure S1). The HP motifs that contribute β-strands are important for vitamin C coordination11. However, possibly due to flexibility, AH1, TM1, AH2, AH3 are not visible in the crystal structure of pmUlaA (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Figure S1). As for ecUlaA, each protomer of pmUlaA, excluding TM11, contains an internal ‘inverted’ structural repeat. The first two helices in each repeat TM2 and TM6-7 gave rise to V-shaped motifs (V motif 1 and V motif 2), both of which interlocked to form the V-motif domain. The rest of the TMs and HPs in each repeat formed the transporter cores (core 1 and core 2). These two transporter-core subdomains, together with TM11, form the core domain of pmUlaA. The substrate vimtain C in the structure of pmUlaA is located close to the membrane surface on the cytoplasmic side (Fig. 1b); therefore this structure is identified as the inward-facing conformation. The dimerization interface between the two protomers of the pmUlaA homodimer is formed with the V motif domains, which is a large and mostly hydrophobic interface, with a buried surface area of ~894.8 Å2.

Conformational changes between inward and outward structures

The inward-facing pmUlaA and outward-open ecUlaA structures align poorly when superposed over the entire monomer. However, when the two structures are superposed according to their orientation in membranes as predicted by the PPM server24 (Fig. 2a), the transmembrane parts of the V motifs align very well (Fig. 2b upper middle). The difference between the two structures can be described as the rearrangement of the cores and V motifs. The core domain undergoes a rigid-body rotation of 11.1° (Fig. 2b lower left) and a translation of 6.68 Å (Fig. 2b lower right) while transitioning from the outward-open to the inward-facing conformation with the substrate-binding site unchanged (Fig. 2c). While the ascorbate group translocator UlaA and secondary active transporters both contain an internal repeat, V motif domains, and core domains, UlaA lacks the third arm TM of each repeat which encases the core domain to transduce the stress when the core domain moves25. In the previous report, by comparing the two V-motif subdomains, “V-motif 1” and “V-motif 2” in each repeat, we proposed that the C-terminus of TM2 and TM7 possibly rotated to release the stress accomplished with core movement23. According to the sequence alignment of V-motif 1 and V-motif 2, we identified the highly conserved Gly58 and Gly286 in TM2 and TM7, respectively, as the potential pivots which are confirmed by the in vitro proteolipsome assays23. With the availability of inward-facing and outward-open structures, the conformational transitions of the C-terminus of TM2/TM7 become clear: the C-terminus of TM2 in V motif 1 undergoes minor changes (Fig. 2b upper left); however, TM7 in V motif 2 swings about 46.67° (Fig. 2b upper right). The other TMs remain stationary during the transport cycle.

Fig. 2. Comparison of inward-facing pmUlaA and outward-facing ecUlaA structures.

Fig. 2

a Orientations of pmUlaA and ecUlaA proteins in membranes as calculated with the PPM server. b Superimposition of pmUlaA and ecUlaA according to the transmembrane region of the V motif. TM2s of V motif 1 showed a small swing beyond the previously identified pivotal Gly58 position, while the C terminus of TM7 beyond Gly286 rotated about 46.67°. The whole core domain between pmUlaA and ecUlaA displayed a large rigid-body transformation, which includes an 11.1° rotation and a 6.68 Å translocation along an axis in the membrane. c Superposition of the core domains of pmUlaA and ecUlaA molecules

Active site architecture

In the ecUlaA structure, vitamin C was caged in an ellipsoid-shaped substrate-bound pocket of the core domain11. Thr86, Tyr87 from HP1, Asp314 from HP3, His194, Gln195 from HP2, Met410 from HP4 (corresponds to Met415 in pmUlaA because of the 5 residue insertion before HP4b), Gln139, Ile136, His135 from TM4a, Ile358, Phe362 from TM9a contribute a mixture of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interaction with vitamin C (Supplementary Figure S3). Mutation of these active site binding residues to alanine or serine would cripple or abrogate the binding affinity for the substrate, as measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)11. The core domain of pmUlaA has the same binding residues as ecUlaA, except the threonine at 86th position is mutated to proline (Supplementary Figure S3). Once the Thr86 of ecUlaA is mutated to proline, one hydrogen bond from the hydroxyl group of threonine would be lost with the expectation of lesser binding affinity for the substrate—vitamin C. The binding affinity between ecUlaA-T86P and vitamin C was approximately 26.48 ± 6.1 μM (Supplementary Figure S4a), compared with the wild type ecUlaA of 6.1 ± 0.9 μM.

In the outward-facing structure of ecUlaA, the substrate (vitamin C) is entirely coordinated by the residues from the core domain (Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Figure S3b). However, when the core domain moves toward the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, the serine at the 59th position from V motif 1 contributes a hydrogen bond to the O3 atom of vitamin C, which possibly stabilizes the charge balance of the substrate (Fig. 3c, d). As the substrate passes through the middle of the membrane, an arginine (R288) from V motif 2 forms a hydrogen bond with the O3 atom of vitamin C (Fig. 3e, f).

Fig. 3. Vitamin C coordination.

Fig. 3

For clarity, only the substrate-coordinating residues different between pmUlaA and ecUlaA are shown here. a, b Substrate coordination in the outward-facing structure of ecUlaA. Vitamin C is entirely coordinated by the residues from the core domain. c, d Substrate coordination in the occluded structure of ecUlaA. Ser59 from V motif 1 contributes a hydrogen bond to the O3 atom of vitamin C, supposed to stabilize the charge balance of the substrate. e, f Substrate coordination in the inward-facing structure of pmUlaA. Arg288 from V motif 2 forms a hydrogen bond with the O3 atom of vitamin C

Functional characterization of UlaA mutants with ecUlaA as a model system

To corroborate structural observations, we set up a growth assay to monitor the growth rate and growth extent of E. coli cells under anaerobic condition with l-ascorbate as the sole source of carbon and energy. In-frame deletion in the coding region of ecUlaA resulted in complete loss of l-ascorbate utilization (Fig. 4a). The presence of the pBAD-WT plasmid restored anaerobic growth on l-ascorbate to wild-type yields at 10 days. Replacement of pivotal residues on V motif domain Gly58 or Gly286 by Alanine invariably diminished l-ascorbate uptake, therefore cell growth, which is consistent with our in vitro proteoliposome assays23. By contrast, the ecUlaA variant Thr86Pro exemplified in pmUlaA showed no significant reduction of growth (Fig. 4b). Replacement of Ser59 from V motif 1 by Ala has no effect on l-ascorbate utilization. Changing Arg288 from V motif 2 to the Lys variant maintains the hydrogen bond between the O3 atom of the substrate and the Nω atom of the residue, which neither changes the electron charges of the binding surface of UlaB, nor results in any effect on the transport of l-ascorbate. However, the Arg288Ala variant abrogated the l-ascorbate utilization completely, possibly because the interaction interface between UlaA and UlaB was altered, which resulted in the abolishment of phosphate group transfer from UlaB to the UlaA-bound substrate.

Fig. 4. Growth studies.

Fig. 4

a Growth of E. coli strains on l-ascorbate. Growth of wild-type and mutant strains were conducted in minimal medium M9 under anaerobic conditions: blue, wild type; magenta, UlaA knock out; red, pBAD-empty vector; green, pBAD-WT. b Growth assay of several ecUlaA variants. Each experiment was repeated three times. Values are mean ± s.e.m. NS, not significant; **p < 0.05

Discussion

Mechanism of membrane transport

Topologically, UlaA more closely resembles secondary carriers26, with the elevator mechanism, another form of the alternating access mechanism, for substrate transport, especially similar to that of GltPh25,27. However, due to the lack of the third arm helix in each repeat as secondary carriers, the V motif subdomain is separated into two functional parts: membrane-spanning parts TM1/TM2 N-terminus and TM6/TM7 N-terminus, and pivot-swinging parts TM2 C-terminus and TM7 C-terminus. The transport activity of UlaA may involve four sequential steps (Fig. 5). The default state is likely to be in an outward open state, similar to the ecUlaA outward-open structure without the bound substrate (not shown). In this state, “Core 2” subdomain (orange) approaches the “V-motif 2” subdomain (magenta) (Fig. 5a). Then, substrate binding to the pocket of the core domain leads to a switch to an inward-facing state, through the movement of the Core relative to the V-motif. In this inward-facing state (pmUlaA), “Core 1” (yellow) is close to “V-motif 1” subdomain (cyan), and substrate pocket is accessible from the cytoplasmic side (Fig. 5c). In the fourth step, UlaB transfers the phosphate anion to vitamin C coupled with energy19,20 (Supplementary Figure S5). As a result, the resultant product l-ascorbate-6-P might leave the binding site and enter into the cytosol. Finally, utilizing the energy coupled with the transferred phosphate originally from PEP, the core domain returns back to the default state and the whole system will restart this novel cycle of transport. Based on the structural analysis and probable rotational freedom of degree of position with the residue glycine, the C-terminus of the last TM in two V-motif subdomains will rotate, pivoted on highly conserved Gly58 and Gly286, to come along with the movement of the core domain.

Fig. 5. Working model for the transport mechanism of UlaA.

Fig. 5

Outward-facing, occluded, and inward-facing structures of UlaA revealed the complete transport cycle of EIIC of the PTS-AG family. The stationary part of V motif 1 is shown in cyan; the swing part of V motif 1 in palecyan, core 1 in yellow, the stationary part of V motif 2 in magenta, the swing part of V motif 2 in pink, the core 2 in orange and TM11 in gray. Vitamin C is shown in ball-and-stick representation

Our inward-facing UlaA structure completes the transport cycle of PTS-AG family. Based on our structural observations, the proposed mechanism of molecular motion is consistent with the previous work of the glutamate transporter homolog GltPh27. And the structural feature of intermolecular pseudo-symmetry in UlaA is similar as the other secondary transporters25 (e.g., LeuT28, AdiC2931, NpaA16).

Materials and methods

Protein expression and purification

We screened multiple UlaA homologs from different prokaryotic species in order to obtain an inward-facing conformation structure. Those genes were cloned into pET21b (Novagen) with a C-terminal His x 8 tag. The transformed C43 (DE3) (Lucigen) cells were grown in Luria broth at 37 ℃ and induced with 0.2 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) after the OD600 reached 1.2. Cells were disrupted with a French Press with two passes at 15,000 p.s.i., in buffer A containing 25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 150 mM NaCl. After a low-speed centrifugation, the resulting supernatant was centrifuged at high speed to sediment a membrane fraction, which then was incubated in buffer A with 1% (w/v) n-dodecyl β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM, Anatrace) and 2 mM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 4 °C. The lysate was centrifuged again, and the supernatant was loaded onto a Ni2+-NTA affinity column (Qiagen). After three washes, the protein was eluted with 25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, 2 mM ascorbic acid and 0.56% (w/v) n-nonyl- β-D-maltopyranoside (NM, Anatrace), and it was then concentrated by Amicon Ultra (Millipore) for subsequent gel filtration in buffer A with detergent and 2 mM ascorbic acid. The UlaA domain from Pasteurella multocida showed a high yield and good behavior in gel filtration. The peak fractions were collected for crystallization.

Crystallization

Crystals were grown after 4 days at 18 °C by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method. The Pasteurella multocida UlaA domain (1-465) protein purified in 0.2% (w/v) n-decyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DM; Anatrace) gave rise to large plate-shaped crystals in 0.28 M CaCl2, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5,42% PEG400 conditions. The best data set collected at a synchrotron for these crystals, at a resolution of 6.5 Å, showed an inward-facing conformation. A detergent screen found 3-cyclohexyl-1-propylphosphocholine (Cyclofos-3, Hampton Research) at 43 mM, final concentration, improved the diffraction to 4.5 Å. Purified protein in 0.4% (w/v) n-nonyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (β-NG, Anatrace) with 43 mM Cyclofos-3 gave rise to cubic-shaped crystals. To further improve the resolution, 0.01 M betaine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) was added into crystallization buffer to improve diffraction to 3.35 Å. All crystals were directly flash frozen in a cold nitrogen stream at 100 K.

X-ray data collection and structure determination

Native X-ray data at 3.35 Å resolution was collected on SSRF beamline BL17U1. The data were integrated and scaled using HKL200032. Further processing was carried out using programs from the CCP4 suite33.

The core domain of ecUlaA (PDB ID: 4RP911) was used as the model for molecular replacement with PHASER34. One distinct solution was identified. The resulting electron density was of sufficiently good quality, and most of the side chains were clearly shown. Additional missing residues were added in COOT35 manually. The structure was refined with PHENIX36. Model validation was performed with PROCHECK37 and the WHATCHECK routine of WHAT IF38. All structure figures were prepared with PyMOL39.

Generation of a UlaA-disrupted E. coli strain

A gene-disrupted E. coli strain was generated by the methods described by Datsenko and Wanner40. BW25113 cells carrying the Red helper plasmid pKD46 were cultured at 30 °C in SOB medium containing ampicillin and 1 mM l-arabinose, and electroporation competent cells were prepared with ice-cold 10% glycerol when the OD600 reached 0.4. The FRT-flanked kanamycin resistance sequence in the pKD4 plasmid was amplified using the primers UlaA-F/UlaA-R. The PCR product was gel-purified, treated with DpnI and re-purified. 1 μg DNA was transformed into 50 μl of competent cell by electroporation with Pulse Controller at 2.5 kV with 25 mF and 200 Ω in chilled 0.2 cm electroporation cuvettes (Bio-Rad), followed by the immediate addition of 1 ml SOC medium containing 10 mM l-arabinose. After incubation at 37 °C for 2 h, the culture was spread out onto a kanamycin-containing LB-agar plate and incubated at 37 °C overnight. To verify that the UlaA sequence was replaced by the FRT-flanked kanamycin resistance sequence, primers UF/DR, UF/Km-R, Km-F/DR were used to amplify the chromosome DNA from the Km-resistance transformants. UF and DR were both the neighboring gene-specific primers; the Km-R and Km-F were Km gene-specific primers.

To eliminate the Km gene in the chromosome, the pCP20 plasmid, which expresses the FLP recombinase, was transformed into Km-resistance cells and selected for ampicillin resistance on an LB-agar plate at 30 °C. The tranformants were incubated at 43 °C overnight and then placed onto an LB-agar plate. Several independent colonies were selected and tested by PCR using primers UF/DR. PCR products were analyzed by both DNA electrophoresis and DNA sequencing. All primers used for gene knock-out experiment were listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Growth assay

Wild type or mutated UlaA coding DNA were subcloned into the pBAD24 vector individually and transformed into UlaA-disrupted BW25113 cells. To measure cell growth under the condition that l-ascorbic acid was used as the sole carbon source, cells were grown anaerobically in M9 minimal medium plus 20 mM l-ascorbic acid (M9A medium), concentration of the L-ascorbic acid was tested to be best for E. coli growth19. Briefly, Cells grown in LB medium were collected, adjusted to OD600 = 1.0 with M9 medium, and then inoculated 1:100 into screw-cap culture tubes. Ampicillin and 2 mM l-arabinose were added into the medium when pBAD24 were used as the expressing plasmid. These tubes were filled to the top with M9A medium, sealed with parafilm, and then incubated at 37 °C without agitation. The OD600 values were measured at 24 h intervals.

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

The assays were performed as described11.

Accession code

The structural coordinate and structural factors have been deposited into the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with code of 5ZOV.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental material (8.9MB, doc)
Download video file (132.8MB, mov)

Movie of L-ascorabate transportation across the cell membrane by UlaA

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff members at beamlines BL17U1, BL18U, BL19U of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility and at Tsinghua Center for Structural Biology for their assistance in data collection and the China National Center for Protein Sciences Beijing for providing facility support. This work was supported by funds from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant No. 2015CB910104 and 2016YFA0501103), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621092). We thank Dr. Milton Saier, Dr. Xiaochun Li, Dr. Elias Debler, and Mr. Philip Schmiege for comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

P.L. and J.W. designed all experiments. P.L., S.D., J.Z., J.D. and H.S. performed the experiments. All authors analyzed the data. J.W. wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally: Ping Luo, Shuliu Dai

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper at (10.1038/s41421-018-0037-y).

References

  • 1.Kundig W, Kundig FD, Anderson B, Roseman S. Restoration of active transport of glycosides in Escherichia coli by a component of a phosphotransferase system. J. Biol. Chem. 1966;241:3243–3246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bramley HF, Kornberg HL. Sequence homologies between proteins of bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase systems: identification of possible phosphate-carrying histidine residues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:4777–4780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Erni B. The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS): an interface between energy and signal transduction. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2013;10:593–630. doi: 10.1007/s13738-012-0185-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barabote RD, Saier MH. Comparative genomic analyses of the bacterial phosphotransferase system. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005;69:608. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.4.608-634.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deutscher J, et al. The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014;78:231–256. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saier MH., Jr. Transport protein evolution deduced from analysis of sequence, topology and structure. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;38:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Galinier A, Deutscher J. Sophisticated regulation of transcriptional factors by the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system. J. Mol. Biol. 2017;429:773–789. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saier MH, Jr, Reizer J. The bacterial phosphotransferase system: new frontiers 30 years later. Mol. Microbiol. 1994;13:755–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cao Y, et al. Crystal structure of a phosphorylation-coupled saccharide transporter. Nature. 2011;473:50–54. doi: 10.1038/nature09939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCoy JG, et al. The structure of a sugar transporter of the glucose EIIC superfamily provides insight into the elevator mechanism of membrane transport. Structure. 2016;24:956–964. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luo P, et al. Crystal structure of a phosphorylation-coupled vitamin C transporter. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015;22:238–241. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalbermatter D, et al. Electron crystallography reveals that substrate release from the PTS IIC glucose transporter is coupled to a subtle conformational change. J. Struct. Biol. 2017;199:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirschi M, Johnson ZL, Lee SY. Visualizing multistep elevator-like transitions of a nucleoside transporter. Nature. 2017;545:66–70. doi: 10.1038/nature22057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mulligan C, et al. The bacterial dicarboxylate transporter VcINDY uses a two-domain elevator-type mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:256–263. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wohlert D, Grotzinger MJ, Kuhlbrandt W, Yildiz O. Mechanism of Na(+)-dependent citrate transport from the structure of an asymmetrical CitS dimer. eLife. 2015;4:e09375. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coincon M, et al. Crystal structures reveal the molecular basis of ion translocation in sodium/proton antiporters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:248–255. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drew, D. & Boudker, O. in Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol 85 (ed R. D. Kornberg) 543–572 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Vastermark A, Saier MH., Jr. Time to stop holding the elevator: a new piece of the transport protein mechanism puzzle. Structure. 2016;24:845–846. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Z, Aboulwafa M, Smith MH, Saier MH., Jr The ascorbate transporter of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:2243–2250. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2243-2250.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Linster CL, Van Schaftingen E. Vitamin C—biosynthesis, recycling and degradation in mammals. Febs J. 2007;274:1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Postma P, Lengeler J, Jacobson G. Phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase systems of bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1993;57:543. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.3.543-594.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lei J, Li LF, Su XD. Crystal structures of phosphotransferase system enzymes PtxB (IIB(Asc)) and PtxA (IIA(Asc)) from Streptococcus mutans. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;386:465–475. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vastermark A, et al. The V-motifs facilitate the substrate capturing step of the PTS elevator mechanism. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;196:496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lomize MA, Pogozheva ID, Joo H, Mosberg HI, Lomize AL. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D370–D376. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boudker O, Verdon G. Structural perspectives on secondary active transporters. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2010;31:418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yew WS, Gerlt JA. Utilization of L-ascorbate by Escherichia coli K-12: assignments of functions to products of the yjf-sga and yia-sgb operons. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:302–306. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.302-306.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reyes N, Ginter C, Boudker O. Transport mechanism of a bacterial homologue of glutamate transporters. Nature. 2009;462:880–885. doi: 10.1038/nature08616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yamashita A, Singh SK, Kawate T, Jin Y, Gouaux E. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature. 2005;437:215–223. doi: 10.1038/nature03978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gao X, et al. Mechanism of substrate recognition and transport by an amino acid antiporter. Nature. 2010;463:828–832. doi: 10.1038/nature08741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gao X, et al. Structure and mechanism of an amino acid antiporter. Science. 2009;324:1565–1568. doi: 10.1126/science.1173654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fang Y, et al. Structure of a prokaryotic virtual proton pump at 3.2 A resolution. Nature. 2009;460:1040–1043. doi: 10.1038/nature08201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Winn MD, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2011;67:235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCoy AJ, et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott W, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291. doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 1990;8:52–56. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL molecular graphics system, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC (2002).
  • 40.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material (8.9MB, doc)
Download video file (132.8MB, mov)

Movie of L-ascorabate transportation across the cell membrane by UlaA


Articles from Cell Discovery are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES