In her narrative, Dr Moncrieff makes assertions about depressive illness, antidepressants, and psychotropic medications.1 Her main points are that these medications are not clinically effective when using rating scales, and that the models proposed for antidepressant action are erroneous. We would suggest that the narrative reflects ideology, as opposed to evidence, and should be interpreted accordingly.
First, a 1969 narrative supplementary review is given as an example of the lack of efficacy of tricyclic and older antidepressants. A more recent (and comprehensive) review found significant benefits for monoamine oxidase inhibitors over placebo, which were surpassed by tricyclics.2 The argument is then made that changes on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) are minimal, in comparison with placebo, and that differences are clinically insignificant when the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale is used, citing among other reviews the Kirsch meta-analysis (where the effect size was 0.313). A similar effect size was seen in a recent analysis of over 500 studies, which reported odds ratios of between 1.37 and 2.13 for response compared with placebo.4
In focusing the argument on change in total HRSD score, Dr Moncrieff appears unaware that the scale was never intended to measure change. A more robust way of analysing it was recently demonstrated, using the rating of subjective mood (item 1 on the HRSD), which would be akin to the CGI. This avoided the influence of antidepressant side-effects on the scale, and found clear benefits for paroxetine and citalopram over placebo.5
A study cited to indicate severity of depression did not predict outcome, evaluated the short-term efficacy of antidepressants and was not intended to test the hypothesis of severity, with the authors reporting significant benefits of fluoxetine over placebo in adults (improvement of approximately 35%).6 The 1964 Medical Research Council trial (which showed the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy) is given as evidence of lack of effect of severity on response; however, the statement that antidepressants did not outperform placebo is not surprising, given that the dose of imipramine was 50 mg and that of phenelzine 15 mg. A more recent and influential publicly funded study (cited over 3000 times in Google Scholar) showed the effectiveness of imipramine (at a therapeutic dose of around 185 mg) in people with severe depression, in comparison with psychological therapies (cognitive–behavioural therapy and interpersonal therapy). These therapies showed little benefit over placebo in this group.7
The rest of the narrative dwells on ‘disease-centred’ models of psychiatric illness, as an alternative to the current ‘targeting a brain abnormality’ approach. We are unaware of modern psychiatry relying on the neurotransmitter models she discusses; the field has moved on significantly, and most neuroscientists would point to more nuanced models involving effects on neural networks and plasticity.8 The predominant references cited here are Dr Moncrieff's own hypotheses.
In summary, we would suggest that Dr Moncrieff's narrative is selective at best, and on cursory examination there is little effort to appraise the literature in a scientifically objective manner. One cannot help but assume that this opinion piece represents ideology over evidence, and therefore any interpretation should be cautious.
Declaration of Interests
Professor Young has the following disclosures: Employed by King’s College London; Honorary Consultant SLaM (NHS UK); paid lectures and advisory boards for the following companies with drugs used in affective and related disorders: Astrazenaca, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Sunovion, Servier, Livanova, Janssen; No share holdings in pharmaceutical companies; lead Investigator for Embolden Study (AZ), BCI Neuroplasticity study and Aripiprazole Mania Study; Investigator initiated studies from AZ, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Wyeth, Janssen. Grant funding (past and present): NIMH (USA); CIHR (Canada); NARSAD (USA); Stanley Medical Research Institute (USA); MRC (UK); Wellcome Trust (UK); Royal College of Physicians (Edin); BMA (UK); UBC-VGH Foundation (Canada); WEDC (Canada); CCS Depression Research Fund (Canada); MSFHR (Canada); NIHR (UK). Janssen (UK)
References
- 1.Moncrieff J. Antidepressants are not antidepressants – an alternative approach to drug action and implications for the use of antidepressants. BJPsych Bull 2018; 42(1): 42–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thase ME, Trivedi MH, Rush AJ. MAOIs in the contemporary treatment of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 1995; 12(3): 185–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, Scoboria A, Moore TJ, Johnson BT. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med 2008; 5(2): e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 2018; 391(10128): 1357–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hieronymus F, Lisinski A, Nilsson S, Eriksson E. Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the absence of side effects: a mega-analysis of citalopram and paroxetine in adult depression. Mol Psychiatry 2017; doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gibbons RD, Hur K, Brown CH, Davis JM, Mann JJ. Benefits from antidepressants: synthesis of 6-week patient-level outcomes from double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials of fluoxetine and venlafaxine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69(6): 572–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Elkin I, Shea MT, Watkins JT, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Collins JF, et al. National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: general effectiveness of treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46(11): 971–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morrison PD, Murray RM. The antipsychotic landscape: dopamine and beyond. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2018; 8(4): 127–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]