Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Food Science and Biotechnology logoLink to Food Science and Biotechnology
. 2017 Apr 30;26(2):473–479. doi: 10.1007/s10068-017-0065-7

Effect of ripening conditions on the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Shimeles Tilahun 1, Do Su Park 1, Adanech Melaku Taye 1, Cheon Soon Jeong 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6049432  PMID: 30263567

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the physicochemical changes and overall nutritional implications of greenhouse-grown “TY Megaton” and “Yureka” tomato cultivars under on-vine and postharvest ripening conditions. In the first group, tomatoes were harvested from a vine at the breaker, pink, and red ripening stages and sampled immediately. The second group was harvested at the breaker stage and allowed to ripen under room conditions to the pink and red stages based on color values, similar to the vine-ripened samples. The results of the present study revealed that fresh weight loss was below the maximum acceptable weight loss and firmness was above the minimum limit of marketing after postharvest ripening to the pink and red stages; moreover, this process did not have any deleterious effect on the antioxidant properties or antioxidant activity of the tomatoes. Hence, the results clearly indicate that breaker-stage tomatoes can be postharvest-ripened under room conditions without affecting their marketability and nutritional components.

Keywords: antioxidant activity, ascorbic acid, lycopene, phenolics, storage period

References

  • 1.FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Cropping Database. Available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html. Accessed July 15, 2013.
  • 2.Lenucci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G, Dalessandro G. Antioxidant composition in cherry and high-pigment tomato cultivars. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2006;54:2606–2613. doi: 10.1021/jf052920c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giovannucci E. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: Review of the epidemiologic literature. J. Natl. Cancer I. 1999;91:317–331. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.4.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Liu Y, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. A prospective study of tomato products, lycopene, and prostate cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer I. 2002;94:391–398. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.5.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agarwal S, Rao AV. Tomato lycopene and low density lipoprotein oxidation: A human dietary intervention study. Lipids. 1998;33:981–984. doi: 10.1007/s11745-998-0295-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Borguini R, Torres E. Tomatoes and tomato products as dietary sources of antioxidants. Food Rev. Int. 2009;25:313–325. doi: 10.1080/87559120903155859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anza M, Riga P, Garbisu C. Effects of variety and growth season on the organoleptic and nutritional quality of hydroponically grown tomato. J. Food Quality. 2006;29:16–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2006.00053.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mostofi YO, Toivonen PM. Effects of storage conditions and 1-methylcyclopropene on some qualitative characteristics of tomato fruits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2006;8:93–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alexander L, Grierson D. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: A model for climacteric fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2002;53:2039–2055. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saltveit ME. Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) reduces ethylene and protein biosynthesis in excised discs of mature-green tomato pericarp tissue. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2005;35:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kader AA, Stevens MA, Albright-Holton M, Morris LL, Algazi M. Effect of fruit ripeness when picked on flavor and composition in fresh market tomatoes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1977;102:724–731. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kader AA. Effects of postharvest handling procedures on tomato quality. Acta Hortic. 1986;190:209–221. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.190.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.USDA. United States Standards for Grades of Fresh Tomatoes. USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC, USA (1991)
  • 14.McGuire RG. Reporting of objective color measurements. Hortic. Sci. 1992;27:1254–1255. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fish WW, Perkins-Veazie P, Collins JK. A quantitative assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002;15:309–317. doi: 10.1006/jfca.2002.1069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim HS, Jung JY, Kim HK, Ku KM, Suh JK, Park YM, Kang YH. Influences of meteorological conditions of harvest time on water-soluble vitamin contents and quality attributes of oriental melon. J. Bio-Environ. Control. 2011;20:290–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pataro G, Sinik M, Capitoli MM, Donsì G, Ferrari G. The influence of postharvest UV-C and pulsed light treatments on quality and antioxidant properties of tomato fruits during storage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 2015;30:103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2015.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arias R, Lee TC, Logendra L, Janes H. Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*, a*, b* color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2000;48:1697–1702. doi: 10.1021/jf990974e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Helyes L, Pek Z, Lugasi A. Tomato fruit quality and content depend on stage of maturity. Hortic. Sci. 2006;41:1400–1401. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pek Z, Helyes L, Lugasi A. Color changes and antioxidant content of vine and postharvest-ripened tomato fruits. Hortic. Sci. 2010;45:466–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nunes MCN. Color atlas of postharvest quality of fruits and vegetables. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. pp. 239–243. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Batu A. Determination of acceptable firmness and color values of tomatoes. J. Food Eng. 2004;61:471–475. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00141-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rai GK, Kumar R, Singh AK, Rai PK, Rai M, Chaturvedi AK, Rai AB. Changes in antioxidant and phytochemical properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) under ambient condition. Pak. J. Bot. 2012;44:667–670. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Helyes L, Brandt S, Réti K, Barna E, Lugasi A. Appreciation and analysis of lycopene content of tomato. Acta Hortic. 2003;604:531–537. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.604.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brandt S, Pek Z, Barna E, Lugasi A, Helyes L. Lycopene content and color of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2006;86:568–572. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dumas Y, Dadomo M D, Lucca G, Grolier P. Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2003;83:369–382. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Opiyo AM, Ying TJ. The effects of 1-methylcyclopropene treatment on the shelf life and quality of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum v ar.cerasiforme) fruit. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2005;40:665–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.00977.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharma S, Mahajan R, Bajaj KL. Biochemical evaluation of some tomato varieties. Vegetable Sci. 1996;23:42–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abushita AA, Emhemed AH, Hussein GD, Péter AB. Determination of antioxidant vitamins in tomatoes. Food Chem. 1997;60:207–212. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00321-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gould WA. Tomato juice manufacture. Tomato production, processing and technology. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 1992. pp. 201–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Park CY, Kim YJ, Shin Y. Effects of an ethylene absorbent and 1-methylcyclopropene on tomato quality and antioxidant contents during storage. Hortic. Environ. Biot. 2016;57:38–45. doi: 10.1007/s13580-016-0130-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.George B, Kaur C, Khurdiya DS, Kapoor HC. Antioxidants in tomato (Lycopersium esculentum) as a function of genotype. Food Chem. 2004;84:45–51. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00165-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1998;46:4113–4117. doi: 10.1021/jf9801973. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chang CH, Lin HY, Chang CY, Liu YC. Comparisons on the antioxidant properties of fresh, freeze-dried and hot-air-dried tomatoes. J. Food Eng. 2006;77:478–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rao AV, Rao LG. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol. Res. 2007;55:207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Food Science and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES