Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2018 Jul 17;9(4):e01113-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01113-18

Moving Forward: Recent Developments for the Ferret Biomedical Research Model

Randy A Albrecht a,, Wen-Chun Liu a, Andrea J Sant b, S Mark Tompkins c, Andrew Pekosz d, Victoria Meliopoulos e, Sean Cherry e, Paul G Thomas f, Stacey Schultz-Cherry e,
Editor: Thomas E Morrisong
PMCID: PMC6050969  PMID: 30018107

Since the initial report in 1911, the domestic ferret has become an invaluable biomedical research model. While widely recognized for its utility in influenza virus research, ferrets are used for a variety of infectious and noninfectious disease models due to the anatomical, metabolic, and physiological features they share with humans and their susceptibility to many human pathogens.

KEYWORDS: advances, animal model, ferret

ABSTRACT

Since the initial report in 1911, the domestic ferret has become an invaluable biomedical research model. While widely recognized for its utility in influenza virus research, ferrets are used for a variety of infectious and noninfectious disease models due to the anatomical, metabolic, and physiological features they share with humans and their susceptibility to many human pathogens. However, there are limitations to the model that must be overcome for maximal utility for the scientific community. Here, we describe important recent advances that will accelerate biomedical research with this animal model.

INTRODUCTION

In 1911, the first study using the domestic ferret, Mustela putorius furo, for biomedical research was published (1). Since then, the ferret has been an invaluable model for cardiac research (2), spinal cord injury (3), epilepsy (4), and several lung conditions, including smoke-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5), cystic fibrosis (6), and tobacco-induced lung cancer (7). The recent development of a database of the anatomical connections and structural features of the ferret brain will likely also improve the relevance of this model for neurological research (8). Yet, the ferret model is most widely recognized for its utility in infectious disease research, especially respiratory infections (Table 1). A variety of human pathogens are known to naturally infect ferrets and often reproduce human disease better than mouse models. In this article, we discuss the recent advances and ongoing initiatives to increase the utility of the ferret model for biomedical research.

TABLE 1 .

Human microbes used in the ferret model

Pathogen group and species Reference(s)
Viruses
    Influenza virus 26
    Respiratory syncytial virus 27, 28
    Metapneumovirus 29
    Measles virus 30
    Mumps virus 31, 32
    Parainfluenza viruses 33, 34
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 35
    Nipah virus 36
    Ebola virus 37
    Rift Valley fever virus 38
Bacteria
    Streptococcus spp. 39
    Staphylococcus aureus 40
    Helicobacter mustelae 41
    Mycobacterium spp. 42
Fungi
    Pneumocystis jirovecii 43

MODELS, GENOMES, AND OMICS

The first transgenic ferret was produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to oocyte recipient cells in 2006 (9). This technique was then combined with adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene to generate a transgenic ferret model of cystic fibrosis and create the first reported ferret genomic bacterial artificial chromosome library (10). More recently, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing techniques were applied to ferrets to develop a model organism to study X-linked, double cortin-related lissencephaly spectrum (11). In addition to genetically modified ferrets, research groups have described the development of immunocompromised (12), pregnant (13), aged (14), and diet-induced obese (DIO [unpublished data]) models to understand disease in high-risk populations. It is likely that new models and transgenic animals will be developed in the near future.

The sequencing of the ferret genome (15) was instrumental in advancing functional genomic analysis. Numerous groups developed reagents to monitor gene-specific mRNA expression levels via TaqMan-based or Sybr green-based real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays for a plethora of targets. Many of these primers are available free of charge through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) established BEI Resources (https://www.beiresources.org/Home.aspx). Bruder et al. described the development of an expression microarray platform that included the identification of 41 genes with consistent baseline transcription profiles across tissues that could be used as housekeeping genes (16). Our group developed and is validating a FLUIDIGM panel with 144 distinct immune response and lung injury and repair genes. Beyond transcription, Tisoncik-Go et al. described an integrated omics analysis that profiles lipids, metabolites, and proteins in the respiratory compartments of influenza virus-infected ferrets (17). Combined, these tools provide powerful resources to the research community.

THE NEXT FRONTIER: THE IMMUNE RESPONSE

Despite its relevance for biomedical research, there are limitations of the ferret model for immunologic studies due to the dearth of reagents. Screening of commercially available antibodies for cross-reactivity with markers on innate and adaptive cell subsets and cytokines in ferrets has yielded limited success (Table 2). To resolve this, a group of researchers from around the world are working together to develop validated reagents and assays to improve our understanding of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the ferret.

TABLE 2 .

Commercial kits and immunologic reagents tested in the ferret model

Product type
and namea
Specificity Clone Isotype Host Vendor Application Reference(s)
Commercial kits
    LIVE/ DEAD Fixable Aqua dead
cell stain
Thermo/Fisher Flow cyt 18
    IFN-γ ELISpot basic (HRP) kit MabTech ELISpot 18
Primary antibodies
    CD44 Mouse IM7 IgG2b, κ Rat BD Pharmingen Flow cyt 19
    IL-4 Bovine CC303 IgG2a Mouse Bio-Rad Flow cyt 19
    IFN-γ Bovine CC302 IgG1 Mouse Bio-Rad Flow cyt 19
    IFN-γ Mouse XMG1.2 IgG1, κ Rat BD Pharmingen Flow cyt 19
    TNF Mouse MP6-XT22 IgG1 Rat BD Pharmingen Flow cyt 19
    Thy1.1 Rat OX-7 IgG1, κ Mouse BD Pharmingen Flow cyt 19
    CD11b Mouse/human M1/70 IgG2b, κ Rat BD Pharmingen or BioLegend Flow cyt 18, 19
    CD8a Human OK-T8 IgG2a Mouse eBioscience/Tonbo Flow cyt 18, 19
    CD4 Ferret 02 IgG1 Mouse Sino Biological Flow cyt 18, 19
    MHC-II Human L243 IgG2a, κ Mouse BioLegend Flow cyt 18
    IgA, IgM, IgG Ferret Poly Goat LSBio Flow cyt 18
    CD59 Mouse AL-21 IgM, κ Rat BD Pharmingen Flow cyt 18
    CD79a Human HM47 IgG1, κ Mouse eBioscience Flow cyt 18
    CD20 Ferret 71 IgG Rabbit Sino Biological Flow cyt 18
    CD3 Human IS5033 Poly Rabbit Dako IHC 44
    Lysozyme Human A0099 Poly Rabbit Dako IHC 44
    CD20 Human RB-9013-P Poly Rabbit Thermo (Fisher) IHC 44
    CD79a Human HM57 IgG1, κ Mouse Dako IHC 44
    MHC-II Human TAL 1B5 IgG1, κ Mouse Dako IHC 44
    CD3 Human PC3/188A IgG1, κ Mouse Santa Cruz Biotech Flow cyt 45
    IFN-γ (capture Ab) Cow CC302 IgG1 Mouse Bio-Rad ELISpot/flow cyt 45
    IFN-γ biotinylated (detection Ab) Dog Poly Goat R&D Systems 45, 46
a

Abbreviations: HRP, horseradish peroxidase conjugate; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; Ab, antibody; Flow cyt, flow cytometry; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

To date, recombinant proteins representing a range of intrinsic, innate, and adaptive immune markers are under development, and some are already available from commercial sources (18, 19). These include type I and III interferons (IFNs), RIG-I and Toll-like receptors, cytokines, and chemokines, as well as cell surface markers for immune and nonimmune cells. In terms of adaptive immune responses, Kirchenbaum and Ross recently developed a monoclonal antibody against the ferret B cell receptor light chain that is useful in distinguishing kappa versus lambda B cell responses (20, 21). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) and flow cytometric assays have been developed to quantify the isotypes of antibody-secreting cells (IgG or IgA) (22), pan-B cells (CD20+, CD79α+), and Ig+ B cells (18, 19). T cell phenotyping has been limited to quantification of overall CD3+ T cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, by flow cytometric assays and identification of antigen-specific effector responses by detecting IFN-γ secretion in flow-based intracellular cytokine secretion assays or ELISpot assays (18). An in vivo depletion of CD8 T cells using a cross-reactive human monoclonal antibody has been shown to delay influenza virus clearance (23). To increase our toolbox, the Centers for Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS) network has undertaken a large project to rapidly produce monoclonal antibodies and develop assays to support the universal influenza vaccine initiative (24). Antibodies in production include B cell markers (CD83, CD86, CD95, CD19, CD20, CD25, CD27, CD38, CD138, CXCR5, and FcR), T cell markers (CD4, CCR7, CD3e, CD40, CD40L, CD44, CD62L, CD69, CD103, PD-1, CXCR3, interleukin-7 receptor [IL-7R], and IL-15Ra) and others (CXCR4, CD140, IL-2, IL-21, and IL-4). These much-needed reagents will facilitate efforts to establish immunologic assays to interrogate the innate and adaptive immune responses to infection and vaccination at the level of detail that is routinely applied to studies of mouse or human immunology. Importantly, the ferret model will allow correlates of protection to be established after vaccination and infection in conjunction with transmission studies, which are not available in the mouse models. Additionally, the longer life span of the ferret relative to the mouse will allow analysis of the evolution of the immune response to sequential infection and/or vaccination (25), permitting more accurate modeling of the immune response in humans.

WAYS FORWARD

While there has been exciting progress, much work remains to move the ferret model forward. Toward this goal, the CEIRS group has produced fibroblasts and primary nasal and tracheal epithelial cells and cell lines, established a repository of defined tissues and cell types (Table 3), and are working with the J. Craig Venter Institute to define the ferret major histocompatibility complex (MHC). An exciting achievement is the completion of the PacBio sequencing of the ferret MHC (Granger Sutton, personal communication). While these are important steps, the ultimate goal is to provide the biomedical research community with validated reagents and protocols they can trust to ensure the rigor and reproducibility in experiments utilizing the ferret model. In support of this goal, many of the reagents created through the CEIRS network will be made publicly available through the CEIRS Data Processing and Coordinating Center (DPCC) website (http://www.niaidceirs.org/resources/ceirs-reagents/).

TABLE 3 .

Current tissue repository

Tissue Samplea Sample forms Sex Comment
Lung Brochioalveolar fluid M Influenza virus infected
Upper right, middle right, lower right, upper left, lower left Single-cell suspension; homogenate; whole tissue; Trizol;
paraffin-embedded tissue
M and F Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Blood PBMC Fluid; isolated cells; RNAlater M and F Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Plasma M Noninfected
Sera M Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Nasal fluid (wash) NA Fluid M Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Spleen NA Whole tissue; single-cell suspension; homogenate; M and F Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Trachea NA Whole tissue; single-cell suspension; homogenate; RNAlater M and F Influenza virus infected and noninfected
Mediastinal lymph node NA Whole tissue M and F Influenza virus infected
a

PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; NA, not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank everyone involved in Team Ferret, whose names we will not list for fear we might miss someone, as well as others producing reagents for the ferret model. We also thank Diane Post (NIAID) and the members of the CEIRS network for feedback, advice, and constructive criticism.

Finally, our funding sources included HHSN272201400006C (St. Jude’s CEIRS), HHSN272201400008C (CRIP CEIRS), HHSN272201400007C (Johns Hopkins CEIRS), HHSN272201400004C (Emory-UGA CEIRS), and HHSN272201400005C (NYICE).

Footnotes

Citation Albrecht RA, Liu W-C, Sant AJ, Tompkins SM, Pekosz A, Meliopoulos V, Cherry S, Thomas PG, Schultz-Cherry S. 2018. Moving forward: recent developments for the ferret biomedical research model. mBio 9:e01113-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01113-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Yeates T. 1911. Studies in the embryology of the ferret. J Anat Physiol 45:319–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Truex RC, Belej R, Ginsberg LM, Hartman RL. 1974. Anatomy of the ferret heart: an animal model for cardiac research. Anat Rec 179:411–422. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091790402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eidelberg E, Staten E, Watkins JC, McGraw D, McFadden C. 1976. A model of spinal cord injury. Surg Neurol 6:35–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Majkowski J. 1983. Drug effects on after discharge and seizure threshold in lissencephalic ferrets: an epilepsy model for drug evaluation. Epilepsia 24:678–685. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1983.tb04630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raju SV, Kim H, Byzek SA, Tang LP, Trombley JE, Jackson P, Rasmussen L, Wells JM, Libby EF, Dohm E, Winter L, Samuel SL, Zinn KR, Blalock JE, Schoeb TR, Dransfield MT, Rowe SM. 2016. A ferret model of COPD-related chronic bronchitis. JCI Insight 1:e87536. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCarron A, Donnelley M, Parsons D. 2018. Airway disease phenotypes in animal models of cystic fibrosis. Respir Res 19:54. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0750-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aizawa K, Liu C, Veeramachaneni S, Hu KQ, Smith DE, Wang XD. 2013. Development of ferret as a human lung cancer model by injecting 4-(N-methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK). Lung Cancer 82:390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sukhinin DI, Engel AK, Manger P, Hilgetag CC. 2016. Building the ferretome. Front Neuroinform 10:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Z, Sun X, Chen J, Liu X, Wisely SM, Zhou Q, Renard JP, Leno GH, Engelhardt JF. 2006. Cloned ferrets produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Dev Biol 293:439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun X, Yan Z, Yi Y, Li Z, Lei D, Rogers CS, Chen J, Zhang Y, Welsh MJ, Leno GH, Engelhardt JF. 2008. Adeno-associated virus-targeted disruption of the CFTR gene in cloned ferrets. J Clin Invest 118:1578–1583. doi: 10.1172/JCI34599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kou Z, Wu Q, Kou X, Yin C, Wang H, Zuo Z, Zhuo Y, Chen A, Gao S, Wang X. 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering of the ferret. Cell Res 25:1372–1375. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huber VC, McCullers JA. 2006. Live attenuated influenza vaccine is safe and immunogenic in immunocompromised ferrets. J Infect Dis 193:677–684. doi: 10.1086/500247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paquette SG, Banner D, Huang SS, Almansa R, Leon A, Xu L, Bartoszko J, Kelvin DJ, Kelvin AA. 2015. Influenza transmission in the mother-infant dyad leads to severe disease, mammary gland infection, and pathogenesis by regulating host responses. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005173. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Paquette SG, Huang SSH, Banner D, Xu L, León A, Kelvin AA, Kelvin DJ. 2014. Impaired heterologous immunity in aged ferrets during sequential influenza A H1N1 infection. Virology 464–465:177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peng X, Alföldi J, Gori K, Eisfeld AJ, Tyler SR, Tisoncik-Go J, Brawand D, Law GL, Skunca N, Hatta M, Gasper DJ, Kelly SM, Chang J, Thomas MJ, Johnson J, Berlin AM, Lara M, Russell P, Swofford R, Turner-Maier J, Young S, Hourlier T, Aken B, Searle S, Sun X, Yi Y, Suresh M, Tumpey TM, Siepel A, Wisely SM, Dessimoz C, Kawaoka Y, Birren BW, Lindblad-Toh K, Di Palma F, Engelhardt JF, Palermo RE, Katze MG. 2014. The draft genome sequence of the ferret (Mustela putorius furo) facilitates study of human respiratory disease. Nat Biotechnol 32:1250–1255. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bruder CE, Yao S, Larson F, Camp JV, Tapp R, McBrayer A, Powers N, Granda WV, Jonsson CB. 2010. Transcriptome sequencing and development of an expression microarray platform for the domestic ferret. BMC Genomics 11:251. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tisoncik-Go J, Gasper DJ, Kyle JE, Eisfeld AJ, Selinger C, Hatta M, Morrison J, Korth MJ, Zink EM, Kim YM, Schepmoes AA, Nicora CD, Purvine SO, Weitz KK, Peng X, Green RR, Tilton SC, Webb-Robertson BJ, Waters KM, Metz TO, Smith RD, Kawaoka Y, Suresh M, Josset L, Katze MG. 2016. Integrated omics analysis of pathogenic host responses during pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection: the crucial role of lipid metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 19:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.DiPiazza A, Richards K, Batarse F, Lockard L, Zeng H, García-Sastre A, Albrecht RA, Sant AJ. 2016. Flow Cytometric and cytokine ELISPOT approaches to characterize the cell-mediated immune response in ferrets following influenza virus Infection. J Virol 90:7991–8004. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01001-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rutigliano JA, Doherty PC, Franks J, Morris MY, Reynolds C, Thomas PG. 2008. Screening monoclonal antibodies for cross-reactivity in the ferret model of influenza infection. J Immunol Methods 336:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kirchenbaum GA, Ross TM. 2017. Generation of monoclonal antibodies against immunoglobulin proteins of the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo). J Immunol Res 2017:5874572. doi: 10.1155/2017/5874572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kirchenbaum GA, Allen JD, Layman TS, Sautto GA, Ross TM. 2017. Infection of ferrets with influenza virus elicits a light chain-biased antibody response against hemagglutinin. J Immunol 199:3798–3807. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cherukuri A, Servat E, Woo J. 2012. Vaccine-specific antibody secreting cells are a robust early marker of LAIV-induced B-cell response in ferrets. Vaccine 30:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ellebedy AH, Fabrizio TP, Kayali G, Oguin TH III, Brown SA, Rehg J, Thomas PG, Webby RJ. 2010. Contemporary seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus infection primes for a more robust response to split inactivated pandemic influenza A (H1N1) Virus vaccination in ferrets. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:1998–2006. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00247-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Erbelding EJ, Post D, Stemmy E, Roberts PC, Augustine AD, Ferguson S, Paules CI, Graham BS, Fauci AS. 2018. A universal influenza vaccine: the strategic plan for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. J Infect Dis. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Myers JL, Bostick DL, Sullivan CB, Madara J, Linderman SL, Liu Q, Carter DM, Wrammert J, Esposito S, Principi N, Plotkin JB, Ross TM, Ahmed R, Wilson PC, Hensley SE. 2013. Immune history shapes specificity of pandemic H1N1 influenza antibody responses. J Exp Med 210:1493–1500. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smith W, Andrewes CH, Laidlaw PP. 1933. A virus obtained from influenza patients. Lancet 222:66–68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)78541-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prince GA, Porter DD. 1976. The pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in infant ferrets. Am J Pathol 82:339–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stittelaar KJ, de Waal L, van Amerongen G, Veldhuis Kroeze EJ, Fraaij PL, van Baalen CA, van Kampen JJ, van der Vries E, Osterhaus AD, de Swart RL. 2016. Ferrets as a novel animal model for studying human respiratory syncytial virus infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Viruses 8:168. doi: 10.3390/v8060168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.MacPhail M, Schickli JH, Tang RS, Kaur J, Robinson C, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Spaete RR, Haller AA. 2004. Identification of small-animal and primate models for evaluation of vaccine candidates for human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and implications for hMPV vaccine design. J Gen Virol 85:1655–1663. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.79805-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thormar H, Mehta PD, Brown HR. 1978. Comparison of wild-type and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis strains of measles virus. Neurovirulence in ferrets and biological properties in cell cultures. J Exp Med 148:674–691. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Parker L, Gilliland SM, Minor P, Schepelmann S. 2013. Assessment of the ferret as an in vivo model for mumps virus infection. J Gen Virol 94:1200–1205. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.052449-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu P, Huang Z, Gao X, Michel FJ, Hirsch G, Hogan RJ, Sakamoto K, Ho W, Wu J, He B. 2013. Infection of mice, ferrets, and rhesus macaques with a clinical mumps virus isolate. J Virol 87:8158–8168. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01028-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mascoli CC, Gower TA, Capilupo FA, Metzgar DP. 1976. Further studies on the neonatal ferret model of infection and immunity to and attenuation of human parainfluenza viruses. Dev Biol Stand 33:384–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rarey KE, DeLacure MA, Sandridge SA, Small PA Jr.. 1987. Effect of upper respiratory infection on hearing in the ferret model. Am J Otolaryngol 8:161–170. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(87)80040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martina BE, Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Van Amerongen G, Peiris JS, Lim W, Osterhaus AD. 2003. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature 425:915. doi: 10.1038/425915a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bossart KN, Zhu Z, Middleton D, Klippel J, Crameri G, Bingham J, McEachern JA, Green D, Hancock TJ, Chan YP, Hickey AC, Dimitrov DS, Wang LF, Broder CC. 2009. A neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protects against lethal disease in a new ferret model of acute Nipah virus infection. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000642. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cross RW, Mire CE, Borisevich V, Geisbert JB, Fenton KA, Geisbert TW. 2016. The domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) as a lethal infection model for 3 species of Ebolavirus. J Infect Dis 214:565–569. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Francis T, Magill TP. 1935. Rift Valley fever: a report of three cases of laboratory infection and the experimental transmission of the disease to ferrets. J Exp Med 62:433–448. doi: 10.1084/jem.62.3.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McCullers JA, McAuley JL, Browall S, Iverson AR, Boyd KL, Henriques Normark B. 2010. Influenza enhances susceptibility to natural acquisition of and disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in ferrets. J Infect Dis 202:1287–1295. doi: 10.1086/656333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sanford BA, Ramsay MA. 1989. In vivo localization of Staphylococcus aureus in nasal tissues of healthy and influenza A virus-infected ferrets. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 191:163–169. doi: 10.3181/00379727-191-42903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee A. 1995. Helicobacter infections in laboratory animals: a model for gastric neoplasias? Ann Med 27:575–582. doi: 10.3109/07853899509002472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McCallan L, Corbett D, Andersen PL, Aagaard C, McMurray D, Barry C, Thompson S, Strain S, McNair J. 2011. A new experimental infection model in ferrets based on aerosolised Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Med Int 2011:981410. doi: 10.4061/2011/981410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dei-Cas E, Brun-Pascaud M, Bille-Hansen V, Allaert A, Aliouat EM. 1998. Animal models of pneumocystosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 22:163–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vidaña B, Majó N, Pérez M, Montoya M, Martorell J, Martínez J. 2014. Immune system cells in healthy ferrets: an immunohistochemical study. Vet Pathol 51:775–786. doi: 10.1177/0300985813502815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pillet S, Kobasa D, Meunier I, Gray M, Laddy D, Weiner DB, von Messling V, Kobinger GP. 2011. Cellular immune response in the presence of protective antibody levels correlates with protection against 1918 influenza in ferrets. Vaccine 29:6793–6801. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cheng X, Zengel JR, Suguitan AL Jr., Xu Q, Wang W, Lin J, Jin H. 2013. Evaluation of the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by the live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines and their roles in heterologous protection in ferrets. J Infect Dis 208:594–602. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES