Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jun 22;18(8):57. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1025-1

Advances in the Genetics of Youth-Onset Type 2 diabetes

Jennifer N Todd 1, Shylaja Srinivasan 2, Toni I Pollin 3,*
PMCID: PMC6051541  NIHMSID: NIHMS979988  PMID: 29931398

Abstract

Purpose of review:

To provide an update on knowledge the role of genetics in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Recent findings:

The prevalence of T2D, once thought to be exclusively a disease of adults, has increased by over 35% since 2001. Youth with T2D tend to have higher rates of complications, more aggressive disease, with more rapid loss of beta-cell function and a less favorable response to treatment than adults. Obesity is the most important risk factor for T2D, and the rise in childhood overweight and obesity appears responsible for the dramatic increase in T2D in youth. However, some obese children do not develop T2D, consistent with genetic differences in susceptibility to the disease in the setting of obesity/insulin resistance, currently far less well characterized in youth than in adults. Recent studies have begun to show associations of several established adult T2D genetic risk variants with youth T2D and related glycemic quantitative traits, including the strongest known cross-population T2D genetic contributor TCF7L2. Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY), a diabetes subtype distinct from type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D, is now known to result from a highly penetrant gene mutation in one of several genes. MODY has been shown to account for or contribute to at least 4.5% of clinically diagnosed T2D, even among those who are overweight or obese, impacting treatment decisions. The recently formed ProDiGY (Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth) Consortium is using genome-wide association studies and whole exome sequencing to understand the genetic architecture of T2D in youth, including how it differs from that of adults.

Summary:

The limited amount of research conducted to date on the genetics of youth-onset T2D, which tends to be a more aggressive disease than adult T2D, suggests some overlap with genes involved in adult T2D and a sizeable influence of highly penetrant monogenic diabetes variants. The ProDiGY Consortium is expected to provide a more comprehensive understanding of youth T2D genetics.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, youth, genetics, monogenic diabetes

Introduction: The burden of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) in youth

Type 2 diabetes (T2D), once thought to be exclusively a disease of adulthood, has increased at a considerable rate in youth, particularly in minority groups, paralleling the rise in obesity. The increase in the prevalence of T2D in youth has been observed in the United States and worldwide 15. The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study is a population-based observational study of diabetes in youth in the United States funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health which reported data demonstrating the increase in prevalence of diabetes between 2001 and 2009. The overall prevalence of T2D in youth was 0.34 per 1000 (95% CI, 0.31–0.37) in 2001 and 0.46 per 1000 (95% CI, 0.43–0.49) in 2009, representing an alarming relative increase of 35% (95% CI, 21.4%-50.0%) 1. However, despite the large-scale epidemic of obesity in youth, there remains a mismatch between rates of childhood obesity and T2D, which is likely due to the substantial latency between onset of obesity and the related risk for T2D 6.

Type 2 diabetes and its comorbidities are significant long-term risk factors for the development of cardiovascular and microvascular complications. The risk of complications increases with the duration of the disease, placing children with T2D at extremely high risk for the development of these complications. Follow-up studies from the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Youth (TODAY) study, a landmark clinical trial of therapeutic strategies for T2D in children and SEARCH indicate that youth with T2D have a substantial prevalence of microvascular complications of diabetes as early as in adolescence and young adulthood 710. While there is lack of formal evidence on the incidence of cardiovascular complications in children with T2D, evidence from adult studies indicate that the combination of long-standing poor glycemic control and additional risk factors such as hyperlipidemia and hypertension increase the risk of these complications. Youth with T2D have higher rates of complications when compared with adults with T2D or children with type 1 diabetes 11,12. Presently, we have limited therapeutic options for the treatment of T2D in youth, with metformin and insulin being the only two FDA-approved treatment options.

Pathophysiology and evidence for genetic susceptibility to T2D in youth

The pathogenesis of T2D in youth is similar to but apparently more aggressive than the disease process in adults, with the lack of adequate compensatory beta-cell insulin secretion in the presence of increased insulin resistance, the critical factor necessary for the development of the disease. While little is known about the natural history of T2D in children, available literature suggests that the rate of beta-cell decline is more rapid than in adults 13,14 and youth with T2D fail metformin therapy at a higher rate than adults 13,14. Puberty is a unique factor in the pathogenesis of T2D in youth and a period in which many adolescents first manifest clinical evidence of the disease. Puberty is associated with a transient physiological increase in insulin resistance even in lean healthy children and is normally associated with a compensatory increase in insulin secretion, a phenomenon that is impaired in children with T2D. The increase in insulin resistance in puberty is believed to be related in part to an increase in growth hormone levels, as growth hormone acts as a counterregulatory hormone to insulin.

Type 2 diabetes is a complex disease, characterized by the interplay between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors. Obesity is overwhelmingly the most important risk factor for the development of T2D, and predisposes to T2D by increasing peripheral resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake. However, not all obese children go on to develop T2D and some children develop T2D at a relatively lower body mass index percentile than others, highlighting the involvement of other factors in the disease pathogenesis.

Type 2 diabetes is a heritable condition. The high concordance rates of T2D in identical twins 14,15, the typical presence of family history of T2D in children with the disease and the disproportionate prevalence of T2D among certain populations such as Native-Americans, Hispanics and African-Americans 13 all provide evidence for the genetic susceptibility to T2D in youth. In the TODAY study, almost 60% of subjects reported at least one parent, full sibling, or half-sibling with diabetes, and almost 90% had an affected grandparent with T2D 13.

Role of common genetic variation in youth onset T2D

Our understanding of the genetics underlying youth-onset T2D has lagged behind our understanding of adult-onset T2D 16. Several studies have examined the impact of genetic risk in healthy children and children with prediabetes. The Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) analyzed genetic associations with fasting glycemic traits from 1,602 self-reported white European children aged 5.9–17.2 years and found consistent direction of effect with observations in adults; the largest effect sizes were observed for risk alleles in GCK, G6PC2, and MTNR1B 17. Kelliny and colleagues 18 investigated the association of glycemic traits with common genetic variants in 2,025 healthy European children, finding that variants in MTNR1B, G6PC2, GCK, and SLC30A8 were associated with higher fasting glucose; all except the latter were also associated with lower beta-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-B) (Table 1). A later study by the same group including additional cohorts for a total of 6,000 children found an additional 5 loci, GLIS3, PROX1, SLC2A2, ADCY5, and CRY2, were also associated with higher fasting glucose; effect sizes were similar to those seen in adults 19 (Table 1). Giannini and colleagues showed that in a multi-ethnic cohort of obese children, a genetic risk score of five T2D risk variants known to modulate insulin secretion in the genes TCF7L2, IGF2BP2, CDKAL1, HHEX, and HNF1A, was associated with higher risk of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), lower insulin secretion, and increased risk of progressing from normal glucose tolerance to IGT or diabetes 20 (Table 1). To date, only one study has examined the relationship between common genetic variation and T2D in youth, finding that a variant in TCF7L2 was associated with T2D in African American youth, with an effect size greater than previously seen in African American adults 21 (Table 1). As this study only examined the TCF7L2 variant, whether other known variants in T2D-associated genes associate with T2D or glycemic traits in youth is still unknown.

Table 1:

Genetic variants associated with glycemic traits and/or type 2 diabetes in youth

Marker Nearest gene Trait Reference(s)
rs560887 G6PC2 FG, HB 1719
rs10830963 MTNR1B FG, HB 1719
rs4607517 GCK FG, HB 1719
rs13266634 SLC30A8 FG 18,19
rs7034200 GLIS3 FG 19
rs340874 PROX1 FG 19
rs11920090 SLC2A2 FG 19
rs11708067 ADCY5 FG 19
rs11605924 CRY2 FG 19
rs7903146 TCF7L2 IS, IGT/T2D*; T2D 20,21
rs4402960 IGF2BP2 IS, IGT/T2D* 20
rs7754840 CDKAL1 IS, IGT/T2D* 20
rs1111875 HHEX IS, IGT/T2D* 20
rs1169288 HNF1A IS, IGT/T2D* 20

Legend: FG, fasting glucose; HB = HOMA-B; IS, insulin secretion; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, type 2 diabetes;

*

association assessed as part of genetic risk score

Role of Monogenic Diabetes in Clinically Diagnosed T2D in Youth

The lack of insulin requirement in some youth with diabetes was recognized as early as 1921, and the notion of a dominantly inherited young onset, mild form of diabetes that could occur in lean individuals was recognized as early as 1928 22. In 1960, Fajans reported that some nonobese children had mild diabetes that responded to sulfonylureas 23,24. In 1974, Tattersall published a paper entitled “Mild Familial Diabetes with Dominant Inheritance,” 25, and shortly thereafter, Tattersall and Fajans coined the term “maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)” 26 (similar to “maturity-onset type diabetes of childhood of the young” first used by Fajans in 1964 24), and subsequently proposed a working definition of “fasting hyperglycemia in a patient under 25 years old which could be controlled without insulin for more than 2 years” 27. Genes in which single highly penetrant variants were responsible for the majority of these cases were identified in the 1990s as GCK (encoding glucokinase) 28, HNF1A (encoding hepatic nuclear factor 1-alpha) 29, HNF4A (encoding hepatic nuclear factor 4-alpha) 30, and HNF1B (encoding hepatic nuclear factor 1 beta) 31. Today there are 14 genes defined as MODY genes, with the remaining ten accounting for small numbers of cases (reviewed in 32).

In 2004, a survey of health care providers of 112 UK children under 16 years of age with non-type 1 diabetes revealed that 20 (18%) were diagnosed with MODY (19 with known mutations) 33. While there have been numerous studies of MODY prevalence worldwide (reviewed in 32, it was not until 2013 that the first systematic study of MODY prevalence in youth in the United States was undertaken, as part of the SEARCH Study34. The three genes implicated in the majority of MODY cases (HNF4A, GCK and HNF1A in MODY 1, 2, and 3) were sequenced in 586 participants under the age of 20 years who were antibody negative and had fasting C-peptide 0.8 ng/mL. Forty-seven (8%) patients were identified to have MODY-causing mutations: 25 with an HNF1A (MODY3) mutations, 7 with an HNF4A (MODY1) mutations, 14 with a GCK (MODY2) mutation, one with two HNF1A mutations and one with both an HNF1A and an HNF4A mutation. Of these 47 individuals, only three (6%) had a clinical diagnosis of MODY, with most of the remainder previously diagnosed as T1D (36%) or T2D (51%). Accordingly, 51% of MODY cases were treated with insulin and 41% with metformin, and only 2/33 (6%) HNF4A/HNF1A cases were treated with sulfonylureas 34, the preferred therapy for HNF4A/HNF1A-MODY at low doses 35. In the TODAY Study, 488 overweight/obese adolescents aged 10–17 with recently diagnosed T2D enrolled in a clinical trial of metformin ± lifestyle modification or rosiglitazone interventions underwent sequencing of 40 genes known or predicted to cause monogenic diabetes, including the 13 MODY genes known at the time. Twenty-two participants (4.5%) were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants classified according to American College of Medical Genetics/ Association of Molecular Pathologists (ACMG/AMP) Guidelines 36 in MODY genes, including seven in HNF4A, seven in GCK, 5 in HNF1A, one in KLF11 (MODY7) and two in INS (MODY10), along with 26 variants of uncertain significance. Notably, the HNF4A cases were significantly more likely to fail metformin treatment (HR = 5.03, p = 0.0002), and all GCK cases maintained HBA1c levels below 8%, both consistent with expectations for the specific molecular etiology. Taken together, these findings indicate that in a non-trivial number of cases, monogenic diabetes or MODY is the cause or major contributor to what is often clinically diagnosed as T2D, even in the presence of overweight or obesity, and therefore sequencing monogenic diabetes genes should be considered in all cases of antibody-negative, C-peptide positive (therefore likely non-type 1), youth onset diabetes. Minimally, emerging additional stratification indices such as low type 1 diabetes risk scores 37 should be used to identify candidates for testing. These findings and methodologies underscore the importance of the specific molecular diagnosis for optimal treatment and provide a glimpse into the potential that further understanding of the genetic etiology of clinically diagnosed T2D will likely have for individualizing and optimizing therapy.

Conclusions and future directions: the ProDiGY Consortium

Given the relatively unexplored genetic landscape of youth-onset T2D, we and our colleagues formed the Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth (ProDiGY) Consortium, a collaboration of the TODAY and SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth studies along with the Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation sequencing in multi-Ethnic Samples (T2D-GENES) consortium, a large collaborative effort to find genetic variants that influence risk of T2D 16. This multi-ethnic resource includes over 3000 cases and 6000 diabetes-free adult controls with both genome-wide genotyping and whole exome sequence data, allowing analysis of common and rare genetic variation predisposing to youth-onset T2D. With these data, we plan to explore whether variants known to be associated with T2D in adult populations associate with youth-onset T2D, and if so, whether the effect sizes are significantly different in youth. Given prior success of leveraging younger, leaner T2D cases to uncover T2D-associated loci 38, we postulate that the extreme phenotype of youth-onset T2D will also discover novel genetic T2D loci. Using treatment data from the TODAY study, we will explore whether genetic variation associates with response to diabetes treatment. We will also be able to estimate the frequency of pathogenic variants, both known and novel, in genes associated with monogenic diabetes, lipodystrophy, or obesity, in youth meeting clinical criteria for T2D. These pursuits will move us closer to the goal of understanding the genetic architecture of T2D in youth and individualizing and therefore optimizing treatment for all children currently falling into the heterogeneous category of T2D.

Acknowledgments

Toni I. Pollin has received grant funding from NIH (U01 DK061230) supporting her contribution to this work. Jennifer Todd has received grant funding from NIH (5K12DK094721–07) supporting her contribution to this work.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

Jennifer N. Todd, Shylaja Srinivasan, and Toni I. Pollin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors. All procedures reported that were performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:


* Of importance


** Of major importance

  • 1.Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311(17):1778–1786. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3201 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P. The global spread of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2005;146(5):693–700. doi: S002234760401217X [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Urakami T, Kubota S, Nitadori Y, Harada K, Owada M, Kitagawa T. Annual incidence and clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetes in children as detected by urine glucose screening in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(8):1876–1881. doi: 28/8/1876 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harron KL, Feltbower RG, McKinney PA, Bodansky HJ, Campbell FM, Parslow RC. Rising rates of all types of diabetes in south Asian and non-south Asian children and young people aged 0–29 years in West Yorkshire, U.K., 1991–2006. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):652–654. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1512 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Praveen PA, Kumar SR, Tandon N. Type 2 diabetes in youth in South Asia. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(2):571–014–0571–4. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0571-4 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee JM. Why young adults hold the key to assessing the obesity epidemic in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(7):682–687. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.7.682 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.TODAY Study Group. Retinopathy in youth with type 2 diabetes participating in the TODAY clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1772–1774. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2387 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mayer-Davis EJ, Davis C, Saadine J, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Cohort: a pilot study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(9):1148–1152. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03591.x [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maahs DM, Snively BM, Bell RA, et al. Higher prevalence of elevated albumin excretion in youth with type 2 than type 1 diabetes: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2593–2598. doi: dc07–0450 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nadeau KJ, Anderson BJ, Berg EG, et al. Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Consensus Report: Current Status, Challenges, and Priorities. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(9):1635–1642. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1066 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Narasimhan S, Weinstock RS. Youth-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: lessons learned from the TODAY study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(6):806–816. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.009 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Constantino MI, Molyneaux L, Limacher-Gisler F, et al. Long-term complications and mortality in young-onset diabetes: type 2 diabetes is more hazardous and lethal than type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):3863–3869. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2455 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.TODAY Study Group, Zeitler P, Hirs K, et al. A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2247–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109333 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barnett AH, Eff C, Leslie RD, Pyke DA. Diabetes in identical twins. A study of 200 pairs. Diabetologia. 1981;20:87–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Willemsen G, Ward KJ, Bell CG, et al. The Concordance and Heritability of Type 2 Diabetes in 34,166 Twin Pairs From International Twin Registers: The Discordant Twin (DISCOTWIN) Consortium. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2015;18(6):762–771. doi: 10.1017/thg.2015.83 [doi].**This paper describes an updated description of a large multi-center twin study of youth onset type 2 diabetes, which provides current opportunities to update concordance and heritability estimates and a resource for future large scale genomics and other –omics studies.
  • 16.Fuchsberger C, Flannick J, Teslovich TM, et al. The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2016;536(7614):41–47. doi: nature18642 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, et al. New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1546–1718; 1061–4036; 2):105–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kelliny C, Ekelund U, Andersen LB, et al. Common genetic determinants of glucose homeostasis in healthy children: the European Youth Heart Study. Diabetes. 2009;58(12):2939–2945. doi: 10.2337/db09-0374 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barker A, Sharp SJ, Timpson NJ, et al. Association of genetic Loci with glucose levels in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis of over 6,000 children. Diabetes. 2011;60(6):1805–1812. doi: 10.2337/db10-1575 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giannini C, Dalla Man C, Groop L, et al. Co-occurrence of risk alleles in or near genes modulating insulin secretion predisposes obese youth to prediabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(2):475–482. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1458 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dabelea D, Dolan LM, D'Agostino R Jr,et al. Association testing of TCF7L2 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic youth. Diabetologia. 2011;54(3):535–539. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1982-7 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tattersall R. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young: a clinical history. Diabet Med. 1998;15(1):11–14. doi: [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.FAJANS SS, CONN JW . Tolbutamide-induced improvement in carbohydrate tolerance of young people with mild diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1960;9:83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fajans SS, Bell GI. MODY: history, genetics, pathophysiology, and clinical decision making. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1878–1884. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0035 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tattersall RB. Mild familial diabetes with dominant inheritance. Q J Med. 1974;43(170):339–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tattersall RB, Fajans SS. A difference between the inheritance of classical juvenile-onset and maturity-onset type diabetes of young people. Diabetes. 1975;24(1):44–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fajans SS, Floyd JC, Tattersall RB, Williamson JR, Pek S, Taylor CI. The various faces of diabetes in the young: changing concepts. Arch Intern Med. 1976;136(2):194–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Froguel P, Zouali H, Vionnet N, et al. Familial hyperglycemia due to mutations in glucokinase. Definition of a subtype of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(10):697–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamagata K, Oda N, Kaisaki PJ, et al. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY3). Nature. 1996;384(6608):455–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamagata K, Furuta H, Oda N, et al. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY1). Nature. 1996;384(6608):458–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Horikawa Y, Iwasaki N, Hara M, et al. Mutation in hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 beta gene (TCF2) associated with MODY. Nat Genet. 1997;17(4):384–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kleinberger JW, Pollin TI.Undiagnosed MODY: Time for Action Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(12):110–015–0681–7. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0681-7 [doi].*This paper describes the prevalence of known monogenic causes of diabetes in a clinical trial cohort of youth clinically diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and treatment implications of not including MODY on the differential.
  • 33.Ehtisham S, Hattersley AT, Dunger DB, Barrett TG. First UK survey of paediatric type 2 diabetes and MODY. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(6):526–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and clinical diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):4055–4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rubio-Cabezas O, Hattersley AT, Njolstad PR, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. The diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15 Suppl 20:47–64. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12192 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patel KA, Oram RA, Flanagan SE, et al. Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score: A Novel Tool to Discriminate Monogenic and Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65(7):2094–2099. doi: 10.2337/db15-1690 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Flannick J, Thorleifsson G, Beer NL, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in SLC30A8 protect against type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2014;46(4):357–363. doi: 10.1038/ng.2915 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES