Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;5(3):ENEURO.0453-17.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0453-17.2018

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics

R-LD P-LD R-Halo P-Halo R-Pl P-Pl λ2(5) or F(5,90) p value Effect size
BMI 21.9 ± 0.7 23.4 ± 0.9 23.5 ± 1.4 21.8 ± 1.1 22.3 ± 0.7 21.5 ± 0.5 0.835 0.528 0.046
Education 13 (81.3) 11 (68.7) 15 (93.8) 13 (81.3) 15 (93.7) 12 (75) 16.25 0.246 0.024
MMSE 29.7 ± 0.1 29.4 ± 0.3 29.4 ± 0.3 29.7 ± 0.1 29.5 ± 0.2 29.7 ± 0.1 0.60 0.699 0.032
FAB 17.6 ± 0.2 17.6 ± 0.1 17.1 ± 0.4 17.6 ± 0.1 17.6 ± 0.1 17.7 ± 0.1 0.89 0.495 0.047
Stroop E 0.4 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.3 0.5 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.5 0.4 ± 0.2 1 ± 0.3 1.87 0.109 0.099
Stroop T 4.6 ± 0.9 4.2 ± 1.3 3.9 ± 0.9 5.5 ± 1.7 5.5 ± 0.7 5 ± 2.1 0.27 0.928 0.016
AES-S 28.4 ± 1.3 26 ± 1.5 27.9 ± 1.5 31 ± 1.6 28.7 ± 1.5 30 ± 1.6 1.43 0.221 0.074
BDI 3.3 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 1 3.3 ± 1.1 6 ± 1.7 3.7 ± 1.1 5.2 ± 1.3 1.01 0.422 0.053
SP 3.7 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.6 4.1 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 0.7 0.56 0.732 0.030
SR 4.8 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 0.7 1.44 0.218 0.074
Money 18.3 ± 0.4 18.1 ± 0.6 17.7 ± 0.6 18 ± 0.2 18 ± 0.4 18.9 ± 0.3 0.71 0.619 0.038
Success rate 435 (12.6) 454 (13.1) 419 (12.1) 407 (11.8) 454 (13.1) 463 (13.4) 6.44 0.266 0.129

Categorical values are indicated as number and percentages (%), numeric values as mean ± SEM. Comparison between proportions is made with χ2 test, comparison between means with one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis (MMSE, FAB, Stroop, BDI) test. Effect size is provided as phi for χ2 test, partial η for ANOVA, and ε2 for Kruskal–Wallis. R-LD, n = 16; P-LD, n = 16; R-Halo, n = 16; P-Halo, n = 16; R-Pl, n = 16; P-Pl, n = 16; Education, participants with ≥15 years of education; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); MMSE, mini-mental state examination; FAB, frontal assessment battery; AES-S, apathy evaluation scale, self-administered version; BDI, Beck depression inventory; SP, sensitivity to punishment; SR, sensitivity to reward; Money, GBP (£) received at the end of the session; Success rate, number of trials in which the maximum amount of points was received (i.e., four points in the reward groups and zero points in the punishment groups).