Abstract
The mechanism of phagophore closure remains unclear due to technical limitations in distinguishing unclosed and closed autophagosomal membranes. Here, we report the HaloTag-LC3 autophagosome completion assay that specifically detects phagophores, nascent autophagosomes, and mature autophagic structures. Using this assay, we identify the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT)-III component CHMP2A as a critical regulator of phagophore closure. During autophagy, CHMP2A translocates to the phagophore and regulates the separation of the inner and outer autophagosomal membranes to form double-membrane autophagosomes. Consistently, inhibition of the AAA-ATPase VPS4 activity impairs autophagosome completion. The ESCRT-mediated membrane abscission appears to be a critical step in forming functional autolysosomes by preventing mislocalization of lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 to the inner autophagosomal membrane. Collectively, our work reveals a function for the ESCRT machinery in the final step of autophagosome formation and provides a useful tool for quantitative analysis of autophagosome biogenesis and maturation.
During autophagy, phagophores elongate to form double-membrane vesicles but the mechanism behind their closure is unknown. Here, the authors develop an autophagy assay and find a role for the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport component CHMP2A as a phagophore closure regulator.
Introduction
Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is an intracellular catabolic process where cytoplasmic material is sequestered into double-membrane autophagosomes for lysosomal degradation1. A series of AuTophaGy-related (ATG) proteins coordinate the initiation, nucleation, and elongation of crescent-shaped isolation membranes or phagophores during autophagosome biogenesis2,3. However, how the phagophore undergoes membrane remodeling to generate the inner and outer membranes of the completed autophagosome remains far from clear4 and has been hindered by technical challenges associated with distinguishing unclosed and closed autophagosomal membranes5.
The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) proteins were originally identified as regulators of ubiquitinated cargo sorting into multivesicular bodies (MVBs) but have since extended to mediate reverse-topology membrane scission in a variety of cellular processes6,7. While ESCRTs failed to be identified in yeast screens for essential ATG genes, ESCRT defects in C. elegans, Drosophila and mammals accumulate autophagosome-like structures8–11. Interestingly, the topological membrane transformation that occurs during phagophore closure resembles that of ESCRT-mediated intraluminal vesicle formation7,12,13.
Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) is a mammalian ortholog of yeast Atg8 that is conjugated with phosphatidylethanolamine to form LC3-II at the phagophore during autophagosome biogenesis14,15. Upon closure, LC3-II on the outer autophagosomal membrane (OAM) is delipidated and released to the cytosol, while LC3-II associated with the inner autophagosomal membrane (IAM) is degraded upon autophagosome-lysosome fusion16. Exploiting the unique topology of LC3 during autophagosome biogenesis, we here develop an autophagosome completion assay to differentiate phagophores, nascent and mature autophagosomes and explore the role of the ESCRT-mediated membrane fission machinery in phagophore closure. We demonstrate that proper autophagosomal membrane closure requires the ESCRT-III component CHMP2A and the AAA-ATPase Vacuolar Protein Sorting-associated 4 (VPS4) activity and that the generation of the OAM and IAM by ESCRT-mediated membrane abscission prior to lysosomal recruitment is a critical step in the formation of functional autolysosomes.
Results
Development of the HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay
To distinguish unclosed and closed autophagosomal membranes, we utilized the reporter HaloTag-LC3 (HT-LC3) in combination with membrane-impermeable Alexa Fluor (AF) 488 or AF660 HaloTag ligand (MIL) and membrane-permeable tetramethylrhodamine HaloTag ligand (MPL) (Fig. 1a). We first generated U-2 OS cells stably expressing HT-LC3 and confirmed that starvation-induced HT-LC3-I lipidation and HT-LC3-II turnover were comparable to endogenous LC3 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). To perform the autophagosome completion assay, cells were starved to induce autophagy followed by permeabilization of the plasma membrane to release cytosolic HT-LC3-I and sequential labeling of HT-LC3-II with MIL and MPL (Fig. 1a). We verified that, while cytosolic HT signals were lost during permeabilization, HT-labeled autophagic structures were retained in the cytoplasmic region throughout the assay process (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The specificity of each HaloTag ligand and the saturation of phagophore- and OAM-associated HT-LC3-II by the initial MIL labeling were verified during assay optimization (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). As expected, three populations of HT-LC3-II structures were detected in the cytoplasmic region of starved cells: (1) MIL+MPL−, representing phagophores, (2) MIL+MPL+, representing nascent autophagosomes, and (3) MIL−MPL+, representing mature autophagosomes, amphisomes, and autolysosomes (Fig. 1b, c). Moreover, the MIL+MPL− signals displayed cup- or oval-shaped structures (Fig.1d, e; arrows in h, i) in agreement with phagophore morphology17, while MIL+MPL+ signals formed nascent autophagosome-like structures in which MIL signals (OAM-associated HT-LC3-II) surrounded MPL signals (IAM-associated HT-LC3-II) (Fig. 1f; white arrowheads in h–j) and MIL−MPL+ puncta were consistent with mature autophagosomal structures in which OAM-associated LC3-II has been delipidated (Fig. 1g; blue arrowheads in j). While nutrient starvation significantly increased cytoplasmic MIL and MPL HT-LC3 signals, only MPL signals were strongly accumulated upon lysosomal inhibition (Fig. 1k) to indicate lysosomal degradation of IAM- but not OAM-associated HT-LC3-II. Similar results were obtained in HeLa cells stably expressing HT-LC3 in the presence or absence of BafA1 or lysosomal protease inhibitors (PIs) (Supplementary Fig. 1e).
LC3 is an aggregation-prone protein that can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy18. To confirm that the HT-LC3-positive foci represent autophagic structures, we generated LC3-I lipidation-defective U-2 OS cells by disrupting the ATG7 gene (Fig. 2a) and performed the HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay. We found that the cytoplasmic region of Atg7-depleted cells was not labeled by MIL or MPL, thus demonstrating the successful removal of soluble HT-LC3-I and the specificity of HaloTag ligands for membrane-bound LC3-II rather than LC3 aggregates (Fig. 2b). To exclude the possibility that HL-LC3-II localizes on non-autophagic membranes, similar experiments were performed in the absence of ATG13, which is dispensable for LC3-II conversion but required for autophagosome formation19. Indeed, knockout of ATG13 did not affect LC3 lipidation but suppressed starvation-induced LC3-II turnover (Fig. 2c, d). Importantly, the cytoplasmic HT-LC3 foci formation was severely impaired in ATG13-deficient cells (Fig. 2e), indicating that the cytoplasmic HL-LC3 puncta are autophagosomal structures. IF staining for the phagophore marker ATG16L further validated the assay specificity, as the majority of ATG16L-positive HT-LC3 puncta were MIL+MPL− rather than MIL+MPL+ or MIL-MPL+ (Fig. 2f). Moreover, correlative electron microscopy confirmed that MIL+MPL− and MIL+MPL+ signals represent ER-associated phagophores (Fig. 2g, h) and autophagosome-like structures (Fig. 2g, i), respectively. Collectively, we succeeded in developing an autophagosome completion assay that distinguishes phagophores, nascent autophagosomes, and mature autophagic vacuoles.
Screening of ESCRTs involved in phagophore closure
The topological membrane transformation that occurs during phagophore closure resembles that of ESCRT-mediated intraluminal vesicle formation7,12,13. To determine if the ESCRT machinery regulates phagophore closure, we screened a siRNA library targeting 40 different ESCRT-related genes (Supplementary Table 1) using the HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay. The screening was performed using serum-free Accell siRNA delivery medium in which autophagy was induced comparable to SM (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Among the strongest hits for the accumulation of MIL+MPL− structures compared to siNT control were several ESCRT-III siRNAs including siCHMP2A, siCHMP3 and siCHMP7 (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Increased MIL+MPL− signals were also detected in cells treated with targeting (CEP55, PDCD6), bridging (VPS37A), and remodeling (AURKB) ESCRT siRNAs. We next validated the screening results using independent siRNA pools targeting CHMP2A, CHMP3, CHMP7, and CEP55. Knockdown of the ESCRT components was confirmed by immunoblotting (IB) (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Consistent with the screening results, depletion of each ESCRT, but not lysosomal inhibition, resulted in a significant increase in MIL+ immature autophagosomal membranes under starved conditions (Supplementary Fig. 3b) to suggest a role of the ESCRT machinery in phagophore closure. Among the hits, siCHMP2A displayed the strongest accumulation of MIL signals.
CHMP2A deficiency results in phagophore accumulation
CHMP2A and 2B are the components of ESCRT-III that form capping assemblies with CHMP3 to drive membrane scission6,20. Our data showed that depletion of CHMP2A (Fig. 3a, b; Supplementary Fig. 4a–c) but not CHMP2B (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b) resulted in a dramatic increase in MIL+ immature autophagosomal membranes in both U-2 OS and HeLa cells under basal and starved conditions. Many of the MIL+ structures in CHMP2A-depleted cells were negative for MPL (magnified images in Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 4c), indicating the accumulation of phagophores. Accumulation of LC3-positive structures by CHMP2A depletion was also observed using GFP-LC3 (Supplementary Fig. 4d) or by staining for endogenous LC3 (Supplementary Fig. 4e) to demonstrate that the phenotype is not due to ectopic expression of HT-LC3. Moreover, the accumulated LC3 structures in siCHMP2A cells contained not only an autophagic substrate p62 but also the phagophore markers ATG5, ATG2A, and ATG9A (Fig. 3c; Supplementary Fig. 6a, b); a result consistent with the failed dissociation of ATG machinery in the absence of closure2. We next performed electron microscopy to determine the ultrastructure of LC3-positive foci accumulated in CHMP2A-depleted cells. Consistently, depletion of CHMP2A accumulated immature autophagosomal structures, some of which appeared to be unclosed (asterisks in Supplementary Fig. 6c). To quantify this observation, a similar experiment was performed in the absence of potassium ferrocyanide, which artificially enlarges the intermembrane space of phagophores and autophagosomes21,22 to allow us to easily detect immature autophagic structures. As expected, a significantly increased number of unclosed autophagosomal membranes was observed by CHMP2A depletion in 2D electron micrographs (Fig. 3d, e). However, we note that due to the limitation of 2D electron microscopy to distinguish closed and unclosed autophagosomal membranes, the actual number of ‘unclosed’ membranes is likely more than that of shown. Collectively, these results demonstrate that CHMP2A depletion results in the accumulation of phagophores.
CHMP2A is required for autophagy
The increase in LC3-II-positive foci is attributed either to the inhibition of autophagic flux or to the promotion of autophagosome biogenesis5. To determine the effect of CHMP2A depletion on autophagic flux, we first performed the tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 assay23. This assay is based on the difference in pKa values between RFP and GFP to distinguish non-degradative (GFP+RFP+) and degradative (GFP−RFP+) autophagic structures. While starvation induced both GFP+RFP+ and GFP−RFP+ structures in control cells, CHMP2A depletion resulted in the accumulation of GFP+RFP+, but not GFP−RFP+, structures under both starved and non-starved conditions, indicating the impairment of autophagic flux (Fig. 4a, b; Supplementary Fig. 6d). Consistently, both basal and starvation-induced lysosomal turnover of LC3-II was found to be impaired by the depletion of CHMP2A (Fig. 4c, d), but not CHMP2B (Supplementary Fig. 5c). These results indicate an indispensable role of CHMP2A in basal and induced autophagy.
CHMP2A translocates to the phagophore during autophagy
We next determined if CHMP2A localizes on the phagophore during autophagy. As the commercially available CHMP2A antibodies failed to show the specificity in our hands (Supplementary Fig. 7), we generated a GFP-tagged CHMP2A. We found that overexpression of CHMP2A-GFP accumulated MIL+MPL− structures in a similar manner to CHMP2A depletion (Supplementary Fig. 8), which is in agreement with the previous observation that overexpression of several ESCRT-III components acts as a dominant-negative to inhibit MVB sorting24. We thus generated HT-LC3 U-2 OS cells that stably express CHMP2A-GFP but do not accumulate autophagosomal membranes under basal conditions (Fig. 5a). We found that nutrient starvation induced CHMP2A-GFP foci formation in the cytoplasm with about half of the signals positive for LC3 (Fig. 5b). Importantly, CHMP2A signals were detected adjacent to LC3-positive puncta and not in the MPL+ autophagosomal lumen (Fig. 5c–f) with a subset of CHMP2A signals located at the edge of phagophore-like structures (arrowheads in Fig. 5c, d) as well as nascent autophagosome-like structures (arrows in Fig. 5e, f). Consistently, CHMP2A signals were detected on phagophore/immature autophagosome-like structures by immunoelectron microscopy (IEM) (arrows in Fig. 5g). Collectively, our data demonstrate that CHMP2A translocates to the phagophore during autophagy.
Inhibition of VPS4 impairs autophagosome completion
The AAA-ATPase VPS4 hydrolyzes ATP to depolymerize ESCRT-III assemblies from membranes6,25. As the function of VPS4 is indispensable for ESCRT-mediated membrane fission26, we examined if inhibition of the VPS4 activity impairs phagophore closure using the HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay. Similar to CHMP2A depletion, the expression of an ATPase-deficient dominant-negative mutant of VPS4A (VPS4AE228Q) resulted in the accumulation of MIL+ structures under both starved and non-starved conditions (Fig. 6a, b). Moreover, VPS4AE228Q signals were frequently detected on MIL+MPL− phagophore-like structures (Fig. 6c–f) and the OAM of MIL+MPL+ nascent autophagosome-like structures (Fig. 6g). Quantification analysis revealed that nearly 80% of VPS4AE228Q signals were associated with MIL+ immature autophagosomal membranes (Fig. 6h). Since CHMP2A depletion or VPS4 inhibition strongly accumulated phagophores even under non-starved condition, impairment of the ESCRT machinery might not only inhibit phagophore closure but also enhance autophagosome biogenesis. To explore this possibility, we measured autophagic flux upon the expression of VPS4AE228Q. In comparison to control GFP transfected cells, the protein levels of LC3-II and p62 were increased in VPS4AE228Q-transfected cells but did not further increase upon lysosomal inhibition with BafA1 (Fig. 6i, lanes 2, 5, 6), suggesting that disruption of the ESCRT machinery impacts autophagy flux rather than induction. Indeed, VPS4 inhibition had minimal effect on the induction of basal autophagy as the levels of LC3-II-increase during the 6 h period of BafA1 treatment were comparable between GFP and VPS4AE228Q transfectants, indicating that VPS4 inhibition does not affect LC3-I to LC3-II conversion. Collectively, these results demonstrate that VPS4 activity is required for phagophore closure.
Functional autolysosome formation requires membrane closure
Despite impaired autophagosome completion, the number of MPL+ structures were slightly but significantly increased by CHMP2A depletion or VPS4 inhibition (Figs. 3b, 6b). Interestingly, electron dense lysosomal structures were occasionally observed between the outer and inner membrane space of autophagosome-like structures in CHMP2A-depleted cells (Fig. 7a, b; Supplementary Fig. 6c). These structures are quite different from a typical autolysosome, in which the IAM is digested to distribute electron dense lysosomal material throughout the vacuole (left panel in Fig. 7a). Notably, we found that CHMP2A depletion did not block the recruitment of the autophagosome-lysosome fusion mediator, syntaxin 17 (STX17)27, to LC3-positive membranes (Fig. 7c). Moreover, while the majority of the STX17-positive structures in CHMP2A-depleted cells were negative for LysoTracker, a small portion of the autophagic structures were labelled by LysoTracker (Fig. 7d). These results suggest that lysosomal fusion can still proceed in the absence of autophagosome completion. However, in stark contrast to control cells where LysoTracker was primarily diffuse in the vacuole lumen, the LysoTracker signals in CHMP2A-depleted cells formed ring-shaped structures (arrows in Fig. 7d). This is similar to that reported in ATG3-deficient cells17 and suggests the impairment of IAM degradation to form a functional autolysosome.
As the inhibition of phagophore closure prevents the separation of the OAM from the IAM, aberrant fusion of an unclosed autophagosomal membrane with lysosomes/late endosomes would result in the distribution of glycosylated lysosomal membrane proteins throughout the autophagosomal membrane. To determine if this occurs in CHMP2A-depleted cells, we performed IEM using an anti-lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 (LAMP1) antibody. LAMP1 signals were detected on the OAM, but not the IAM, in control siNT-transfected cells (Fig. 7e; Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating that lysosomal fusion occurs after the completion of autophagosome formation. In contrast, while the majority of autophagic structures in CHMP2A-depleted cells were negative for LAMP1, some of the phagophore/immature autophagosome-like structures were found to be LAMP1 positive and contained LAMP1 signals in both OAM and IAM (Fig. 7e; Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating the importance of phagophore closure for the proper autolysosome formation.
Finally, we determined if the atypical phagophore-lysosome fusion contributes to the increase in MPL+ structures upon CHMP2A depletion. To this end, cells were depleted of CHMP2A in the presence or absence of the sarco/ER Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor thapsigargin (TG), which has been shown to arrest autophagy by blocking autophagosome fusion with endosomes and lysosomes28. As expected, we found that MPL but not MIL signals were significantly decreased in siCHMP2A-transfected cells while TG increased both MIL and MPL in control cells (Fig. 8a, b). To verify if the TG-induced MPL signal reduction is due to the inhibition of atypical phagophore closure in CHMP2A-depleted cells, we performed the GFP-LC3 protease protection assay29, which is based on the accessibility of protease to autophagosome-sequestered (inaccessible) and autophagosome-unsequestered (accessible) LC3. Consistent with the HT-LC3 assay results, we found that the sensitivity of GFP-LC3-II to proteinase K (ProK) was enhanced by CHMP2A depletion in both low-speed and high-speed pellet (HSP) fractions (Fig. 8c), and that TG treatment further increased the proportion of protease-accessible GFP-LC3-II in CHMP2A-depleted cells (Fig. 8d). Collectively, these results further demonstrate the role of CHMP2A in proper phagophore closure during autophagosome biogenesis.
Discussion
The ESCRT components have been suggested as potential regulators of autophagosomal membrane closure7,12,13. However, characterization of the roles of each ESCRT protein in phagophore closure is technically challenging due to the lack of a robust assay that can distinguish phagophores and nascent autophagosomes. In this study, we develop an HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay and demonstrate a role for ESCRT proteins in phagophore closure. By sequentially labelling membrane-unenclosed and membrane-enclosed HT-LC3-II with saturated doses of MIL and MPL, respectively, we are able to distinguish MIL+MPL− phagophores, MIL+MPL+ nascent autophagosomes, and MIL−MPL+ mature autophagic vacuoles. We demonstrate that our assay provides a superior signal-to-noise ratio and high reproducibility with a semi-quantitative output and high-throughput adaptability by performing a siRNA screen of the ESCRT components and identifying several subunits, including the ESCRT-III CHMP2A, as critical regulators of phagophore closure. As far as we know, this is the first experimental demonstration that phagophore closure is regulated by the ESCRT machinery.
Our data shows that CHMP2A translocates to the phagophore during autophagy. The observation that CHMP2A depletion dramatically increases MIL+MPL− signals in the HT-LC3 autophagosome completion assay is consistent with the electron microscopy and proteinase K protection assay results that demonstrate the accumulation of unclosed phagophore-like structures and protease-unprotected GFP-LC3-II, respectively. The accumulation of MIL+MPL− signals also occurs upon the inhibition of VPS4 by expression of the ATPase-deficient mutant VPS4AE228Q. Moreover, VPS4AE228Q accumulates on MIL+MPL− structures, suggesting that VPS4 functions together with CHMP2A at the phagophore closure site to drive the membrane fission and generate the OAM and IAM. While these results indicate the role of the ESCRT-mediated membrane abscission and subsequent OAM and IAM separation for phagophore closure, it has been proposed that impairment of MVB formation by ESCRT inactivation may cause metabolic stresses, which trigger pro-autophagic signaling13. Indeed, it has been reported that ESCRT defects activate JNK (a potent autophagy inducer30) in Drosophila31,32 and increase autophagic flux in C. elegans33. Consistently, although we find that the autophagic flux is inhibited by CHMP2A depletion and that the rate of LC3-I to LC3-II conversion is not enhanced by VPS4 inhibition, we observe slight accumulation of either or both of MIL and MPL signals in about one third of the cells transfected with siRNAs against other ESCRT components as compared to control siNT-transfected cells. Therefore, an elevated rate of autophagy induction due to the impairment of MVB formation may partially contribute to the drastic accumulation of phagophores in CHMP2A/VPS4-inactivated cells in addition to phagophore closure impairment.
While the current study focuses on the function of CHMP2A in autophagy, we also find other ESCRT-III proteins including CHMP3 and CHMP7 as potential regulators of phagophore closure. However, unlike CHMP2A, knockdown of these proteins only moderately accumulates MIL+ immature autophagosome-like structures and many of the other components of the ESCRT machinery appear to be dispensable for phagophore closure. This observation is not surprising, since it has previously been reported that, unlike the canonical ESCRT-mediated membrane fission requiring ESCRT-0, -I, -II, and –III subunits, only CHMP2 and CHMP4 are found to be critical ESCRT-III components during HIV budding34. Moreover, it has recently been shown that nuclear envelope reformation is regulated by the ESCRT-III subunits CHMP2A and CHMP7 in a manner that is independent of canonical upstream targeting and bridging molecules35–37. Thus, the phagophore closure may also be regulated by a noncanonical ESCRT pathway. Moreover, as the present siRNA screening only targets single ESCRT genes, it is important in the future to examine the effects of combinational targeting of functionally redundant ESCRT subunits (e.g., VPS4A/B, CHMP4A-C, and ALIX/ESCRT-I/II) on phagophore closure to fully characterize the ESCRT machinery for autophagosome completion.
Our data also show that, while phagophore closure is important for lysosome recruitment and fusion, a small fraction of unclosed autophagosomal membranes still can undergo lysosomal fusion. However, this event appears to be nonproductive, as LAMP1 is distributed on both the OAM and IAM and the lysosomal contents are accumulated in the intermembrane space rather than the lumen of the autophagosome-like structure. Moreover, the observation that nearly all of phagophore/immature autophagosome-like structures in CHMP2A-depeleted cells are positive for STX17 is consistent with a recent report showing that STX17 dissociation is triggered by IAM degradation17. We hypothesize that the generation of the OAM and IAM by ESCRT-mediated membrane fission prior to lysosomal fusion is critical to prevent the misdistribution of glycosylated lysosomal membrane proteins on the IAM, and the failure of which limits access to lysosomal proteases and lipases thus impairing degradation.
Methods
Reagents
The following antibodies were used for IB, immunofluorescence (IF) and IEM: ATG7 (IB; Santa Cruz, SC-8668, 1:300); ATG9A (IF; Cell Signaling, 13509, 1:300); ATG16L (IF, MBL, PM040, 1:400); β-Actin (IB, Sigma-Aldrich, A5441, 1:10,000); CD107a/LAMP1 (IEM, BD Biosciences, 555798, 1:100); CEP55 (IB; Santa Cruz, SC- 377018, 1:200); CHMP2A (IB, Proteintech, 104771-AP, 1:1,000); CHMP2B (IB, Cell Signaling, 76173, 1:1,000); CHMP3 (IB; Santa Cruz, SC-166361, 1:200); CHMP7 (IB; Santa Cruz, SC- 271805, 1:200); GFP (IEM, Abcam, ab6556, 1:500); MAP1LC3B (IB, Novus, NB100-2220, 1:3,000; IF, Cell Signaling, 3868, 1:200); Nanogold- Fab’ (IEM; Nanoprobes, 2002 (mouse), 2004 (rabbit), 1:500); p62 (IB, IF; American Research Products, 03-GP62-C, 1:4,000 (IB), 1:400 (IF)). Accell SMART Pool siRNAs and ON-TARGETplus SMART Pool siRNAs listed in table S1 were purchased from GE Healthcare Dharmacon. All other reagents were obtained from the following sources: Bafilomycin A1 (LC Laboratories, B-1080); bovine serum albumin (BSA) (EMD Millipore, 126575; Calbiochem, 126575 (for IEM)); digitonin (Sigma-Aldrich, D141); gelatin from cold water fish skin (Sigma-Aldrich, G7765); GoldEnhance EM (Nanoprobes, 2113); Membrane-impermeable HaloTag Ligand (MIL) (Promega, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated, G1001; Alexa Fluor 660-conjugated, G8471); Membrane-permeable HaloTag Ligand (MPL) (Promega, tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated, G8251); normal goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, G9023); Nucleofector Kit V (Lonza, VCA-1003); Nucleofector Kit R (Lonza, VCA-1001); paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15710); proteinase K (Invitrogen, 25530-049); saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, 84510); thapsigargin (Sigma-Aldrich, T9033); XF Plasma Membrane Permeabilizer (XF-PMP) (Seahorse Bioscience, 102504-100). pHaloTag-human MAP1LC3-Lv110 (HT-LC3) was custom-made by GeneCopoeia. The human CHMP2A cDNA (gift from Dr. Gerlich, Addgene#31805) was amplified by PCR using a primer set (5′–TTTGCTAGCGCCACCATGGACCTATTGTTCGGGC-3′; 5′-TTGAATTCGGTCCCTCCGCAGGTTCTTAA-3′) and subcloned into the Nhe I-EcoRI site of pCDH1-EGFP(N1)-EF1-puro. The linker sequence between CHMP2A and GFP is N′-(CHMP2A)-RILQSTVPRARDPPVAT-(GFP)-C′. The pCDH1-EGFP(N1)-EF1-puro vector was generated by subcloning the MCS-EGFP sequence of pEGFP-N1 (Clontech, #6085-1) into the Nhe I-NotI site of pCDH1-MCS1-EF1-Puro (System Biosciences, #CD510A-1). The following plasmids were gifted from Dr. Mizushima: pMXs-IP-EGFP-LC3 (Addgene#38195);38 pMXs-IP-EGFP-mAtg5 (Addgene#38196);38 pMRXIP GFP-STX17TM (Addgene#45910)27; pEGFP-C1-human ATG2A (Addgene#36456)29. pCDH1-EGFP-human ATG2A, lentiCRISPR v2-human ATG2A sgRNA, pLX-human ATG2B sgRNA, lentiCRISPR v2-human ATG7 sgRNA were generated as previously described39. Human ATG13 sgRNAs (5′-TCTTTTCACCAAGCCGAGCC-3′, 5’-CACATGGACCTCCCGACTGC-3′, and 5′-CAGTCTGTTGTACACCGTGT-3′) were sub-cloned into LRG (Lenti_sgRNA_EFS_GFP) (Addgene 65656).
Cell culture
HeLa cells and U-2 OS cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modification of Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and McCoy’s 5 A Medium, respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1 × Antibiotic Antimycotic Solution (Corning, 30-004-CI).
Transfection and viral transduction
Retrovirus-mediated and lentivirus-mediated gene transductions were performed as described previously40. To generate HT-LC3 U-2 OS and HeLa cells, cells were transduced with lentiviruses encoding HT-LC3 and selected with 1 µg/ml puromycin for 5 days. ATG2A/B double-knockout and ATG7 knockout U-2 OS cells were generated as previously described39. To generate ATG13 knockout U-2 OS cells, cells were transfected with an equal amount (6 µg each per a 10-cm dish) of three human ATG13 gRNA for 48 h and sorted for GFP-positive transfected cells. Fourteen days after transfection, the cells were re-sorted for GFP-negative population to eliminate Cas9 stable transfectants and used for experiments. For siRNA screening, cells were grown overnight on the Lab-TekII 8-well Chambered Coverglass (Nunc, 155409) and incubated in Accell siRNA Delivery Medium (Dharmacon, B-005000-100) containing 1 µM Accell siRNA for 72 h. siRNA-mediated gene silencing was performed by nucleofection according to the manufacture’s protocol.
Fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy
Cells were grown on Lab-TekII Chambered Coverglass, Chamber Slide (Nunc, 154941) or Glass Bottom Dish (MatTek, P35GCOL-0-14-C). IF was performed as follows: for the detection of p62 and ATG9A, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)-phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 3 min. For LC3, cells were permeabilized and fixed in methanol at −20 °C for 10 min. Cells were then incubated in 10% normal goat serum for 1 h followed by the primary and the secondary antibodies and mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Scientific, P10144 or P36941 (with DAPI)). Fluorescent images were obtained using a Leica AOBS SP8 laser-scanning confocal microscope (63× water or oil-immersion lens), or an OLYMPUS IX81 deconvolution microscope (63× oil-immersion lens), deconvolved using Huygens deconvolution software (Scientific Volume Imaging) or SlideBook software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations), and analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane), Volocity software (PerkinElmer) or SlideBook software. Electron microscopy was performed as previously described41,42. Briefly, cells were grown on Thermanox plastic coverslips (Thermo Scientific, 174950) overnight, incubated in SM for 2–3 h, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde-2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, for 1.5 h at room temperature followed by post-fixation buffer (1% osmium tetroxide/1.5% potassium ferrocyanide-0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.3) for 1 h or overnight, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, embedded in EMbed 812 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 14120), sectioned at a thickness of 70 nm, mounted on mesh copper grids, stained with aqueous uranyl acetate and lead citrate and analyzed using a JEOL JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope. For the quantification of autophagic structures, samples were post-fixed in the absence of potassium ferrocyanide.
Immunoelectron microscopy
IEM was performed as described previously43,44. Briefly, cells grown on Thermanox plastic coverslips were starved for 2–3 h, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) (PB) for 2 h, permeabilized with 0.25% saponin for 30 min, incubated in blocking buffer (10% BSA, 10% normal goat serum, 0.1% cold water fish gelatin, 0.1% saponin) for 30 min followed by the primary (overnight at 4 °C) and the secondary (for 1 h) antibodies, post-fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde-PB for 10 min, and washed in 50 mM glycine-PBS for 15 min. The signals were then intensified with the GoldEnhance EM for 2–3 min. After washing in 1% sodium thiosulfate for 5 s, the specimens were incubated in post-fixation buffer (1% osmium tetroxide/1.5% potassium ferrocyanide-0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.3) and processed as described above.
HaloTag-LC3 autophagosome completion assay
HaloTag-LC3 expressing cells were incubated in 1× MAS buffer (220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 10 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA) containing XF-PMP (2–3 nM for U-2 OS and 3 nM for HeLa cells) and MIL at 37 °C for 15 min. Alternatively, cells were permeabilized with 20 μM digitonin at 37 °C for 2 min and incubated with MIL at 37 °C for 15 min (Fig. 1h-j; Supplementary Fig. 1c). Cells were then fixed in 4% PFA for 5 min, washed three times in PBS, and incubated with MPL for 30 min. After washing three times in PBS, cells were analyzed by fluorescence deconvolution or confocal microscopy.
Correlative light electron microscopy
For correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM), cells were grown overnight on Gridded Glass Bottom Dish (MatTek, P35G-1.5-14-C-GRID), starved for 2 h, fixed in 4% PFA-PBS for 5 min, and incubated with 1× MAS containing XF-PMP and MIL for 30 min followed by MPL for 30 min. Cells of interest were identified by correlating the grid, and three-dimensional images were obtained by confocal microscopy before processing for electron microscopy.
Immunoblotting
Total cell lysates were prepared in radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1% Deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by IB with the indicated antibodies. The signal intensities were quantified using the Image Studio version 5 software (LI-COR Biotechnology)45. Uncropped scans of all the blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10.
Protease protection assay
Cells were resuspended in ice-cold homogenization buffer (HB: 0.25 M sucrose, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0), passed 10 times through a 27-guage syringe needle and then centrifuged at 300 × g at 4 °C for 5 min to obtain post-nuclear supernatant (PNS). The PNS was centrifuged at 7600 × g at 4 °C for 5 min to obtain low-speed pellet (LSP) and supernatant (S76). The S76 was then centrifuged at 100,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min to obtain high-speed pellet (HSP) and supernatant. Each pellet fraction was resuspended in ice-cold HB, equally divided into three tubes and incubated with or without 100 µg/ml proteinase K and 0.5% Triton X-100 on ice for 30 min. After the addition of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to stop the reaction, the reaction mixture was subjected to IB.
Statistical analyses
Statistical significance was determined using Graph Pad Prism 7.0. Threshold for statistical significance for each test was set at 95% confidence (p < 0.05).
Data availability
All the data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors (Y.Y; H.-G.W).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Rachael Mills for proofreading the manuscript. This work was supported by the Lois High Berstler Research Endowment Fund and the Four Diamonds Fund of the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. Confocal images were generated using the Leica SP8 microscope (NIH Shared Instrumentation grant S10OD010756-01A1) located in the Penn State Microscopy Imaging Core Facility.
Author contributions
Y.T., H.H., Z.T., T.H., and Y.L performed the experiments and analyzed the data; M.M.Y., J.M.S., L.C., M.G., C.C., C.A.W., J.M.A., H.C., and T.A. assisted in collecting and analyzing the data; Y.T. and H.-G.W. designed the experiments and prepared the figures and the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-05254-w.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Yoshinori Takahashi, Email: ytakahashi@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Hong-Gang Wang, Email: huw11@pus.edu.
References
- 1.Eskelinen EL. New insights into the mechanisms of macroautophagy in mammalian cells. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008;266:207–247. doi: 10.1016/S1937-6448(07)66005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;27:107–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:651–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1205406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:759–774. doi: 10.1038/nrm3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Christ L, Raiborg C, Wenzel EM, Campsteijn C, Stenmark H. Cellular functions and molecular mechanisms of the ESCRT membrane-scission machinery. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hurley JH. ESCRTs are everywhere. EMBO J. 2015;34:2398–2407. doi: 10.15252/embj.201592484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee JA, Beigneux A, Ahmad ST, Young SG, Gao FB. ESCRT-III dysfunction causes autophagosome accumulation and neurodegeneration. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1561–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rusten TE, et al. ESCRTs and Fab1 regulate distinct steps of autophagy. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1817–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Filimonenko M, et al. Functional multivesicular bodies are required for autophagic clearance of protein aggregates associated with neurodegenerative disease. J. Cell Biol. 2007;179:485–500. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roudier N, Lefebvre C, Legouis R. CeVPS-27 is an endosomal protein required for the molting and the endocytic trafficking of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Traffic. 2005;6:695–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Knorr RL, Lipowsky R, Dimova R. Autophagosome closure requires membrane scission. Autophagy. 2015;11:2134–2137. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1091552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rusten TE, Stenmark H. How do ESCRT proteins control autophagy? J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:2179–2183. doi: 10.1242/jcs.050021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kabeya Y, et al. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000;19:5720–5728. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mizushima N, et al. Dissection of autophagosome formation using Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 2001;152:657–668. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.4.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tanida I, Minematsu-Ikeguchi N, Ueno T, Kominami E. Lysosomal turnover, but not a cellular level, of endogenous LC3 is a marker for autophagy. Autophagy. 2005;1:84–91. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.2.1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsuboyama K, et al. The ATG conjugation systems are important for degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane. Science. 2016;354:1036–1041. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuma A, Matsui M, Mizushima N. LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy. 2007;3:323–328. doi: 10.4161/auto.4012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaizuka T, Mizushima N. Atg13 Is Essential for Autophagy and Cardiac Development in Mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;36:585–595. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01005-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alonso YAM, Migliano SM, Teis D. ESCRT-III and Vps4: a dynamic multipurpose tool for membrane budding and scission. FEBS J. 2016;283:3288–3302. doi: 10.1111/febs.13688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eskelinen EL. Fine structure of the autophagosome. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;445:11–28. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-157-4_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kishi-Itakura C, Koyama-Honda I, Itakura E, Mizushima N. Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:4089–4102. doi: 10.1242/jcs.156034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3:452–460. doi: 10.4161/auto.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Teis D, Saksena S, Emr SD. Ordered assembly of the ESCRT-III complex on endosomes is required to sequester cargo during MVB formation. Dev. Cell. 2008;15:578–589. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peel S, Macheboeuf P, Martinelli N, Weissenhorn W. Divergent pathways lead to ESCRT-III-catalyzed membrane fission. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011;36:199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Adell MA, et al. Coordinated binding of Vps4 to ESCRT-III drives membrane neck constriction during MVB vesicle formation. J. Cell Biol. 2014;205:33–49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201310114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Itakura E, Kishi-Itakura C, Mizushima N. The hairpin-type tail-anchored SNARE syntaxin 17 targets to autophagosomes for fusion with endosomes/lysosomes. Cell. 2012;151:1256–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ganley IG, Wong PM, Gammoh N, Jiang X. Distinct autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion mechanism revealed by thapsigargin-induced autophagy arrest. Mol. Cell. 2011;42:731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Velikkakath AK, Nishimura T, Oita E, Ishihara N, Mizushima N. Mammalian Atg2 proteins are essential for autophagosome formation and important for regulation of size and distribution of lipid droplets. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2012;23:896–909. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e11-09-0785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou YY, Li Y, Jiang WQ, Zhou LF. MAPK/JNK signalling: a potential autophagy regulation pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2015;35:e00199. doi: 10.1042/BSR20140141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Herz HM, et al. vps25 mosaics display non-autonomous cell survival and overgrowth, and autonomous apoptosis. Development. 2006;133:1871–1880. doi: 10.1242/dev.02356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rodahl LM, et al. Disruption of Vps4 and JNK function in Drosophila causes tumour growth. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Djeddi A, et al. Induction of autophagy in ESCRT mutants is an adaptive response for cell survival in C. elegans. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:685–694. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Morita E, et al. ESCRT-III protein requirements for HIV-1 budding. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gu M, et al. LEM2 recruits CHMP7 for ESCRT-mediated nuclear envelope closure in fission yeast and human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E2166–E2175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613916114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Olmos Y, Hodgson L, Mantell J, Verkade P, Carlton JG. ESCRT-III controls nuclear envelope reformation. Nature. 2015;522:236–239. doi: 10.1038/nature14503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vietri M, et al. Spastin and ESCRT-III coordinate mitotic spindle disassembly and nuclear envelope sealing. Nature. 2015;522:231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature14408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hara T, et al. FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 2008;181:497–510. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200712064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tang Z, et al. Atg2A/B deficiency switches cytoprotective autophagy to non-canonical caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:2127–2138. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Young MM, et al. Autophagosomal membrane serves as platform for intracellular death-inducing signaling complex (iDISC)-mediated caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:12455–12468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takahashi Y, et al. Bif-1 regulates Atg9 trafficking by mediating the fission of Golgi membranes during autophagy. Autophagy. 2011;7:61–73. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.1.14015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Takahashi Y, et al. Bif-1 haploinsufficiency promotes chromosomal instability and accelerates Myc-driven lymphomagenesis via suppression of mitophagy. Blood. 2013;121:1622–1632. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-459826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Takahashi Y, et al. Bif-1 interacts with Beclin 1 through UVRAG and regulates autophagy and tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:1142–1151. doi: 10.1038/ncb1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Takahashi Y, et al. The Bif-1-Dynamin 2 membrane fission machinery regulates Atg9-containing vesicle generation at the Rab11-positive reservoirs. Oncotarget. 2016;7:20855–20868. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Serfass JM, et al. Endophilin B2 facilitates endosome maturation in response to growth factor stimulation, autophagy induction, and influenza A virus infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:10097–10111. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.792747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors (Y.Y; H.-G.W).