Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2018 Jul 23;2018:bcr2018226226. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-226226

Circumflex retroesophageal right aortic arch: rare differential of mediastinal widening

Niraj Nirmal Pandey 1,#, Arun Sharma 1,#, Manish Shaw 1,#, Sanjeev Kumar 1,#
PMCID: PMC6058160  PMID: 30037842

Description

A 48-year-old man presented to the outpatient department with complaints of inspiratory stridor and occasional dysphagia. Chest radiograph revealed bilateral symmetric widening of the superior mediastinum at the level of aortic arch with the descending aorta seen to the left of spine. No lateral displacement of tracheal air column was noted (figure 1A). The patient was referred to us for a CT angiography (CTA) with a provisional diagnosis of an aneurysm or a mediastinal mass. Review of CTA images revealed a right-sided aortic arch crossing the midline posterior to the trachea and the oesophagus in the upper mediastinum and further descending on the left side of spine (figure 1B–E). A Kommerell’s diverticulum arising from the anterosuperior aspect of aorta, on the left side, gave rise to an aberrant left subclavian artery (LSCA). The circumflex arch was ectatic and measured 37 mm in its maximum diameter. Moderate compression on the posterior aspect of trachea by the ectatic circumflex arch was noted (figure 1E–F).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Frontal chest radiograph reveals bilateral symmetric widening of the superior mediastinum at the level of aortic arch with the descending aorta seen to the left of spine. No lateral displacement of tracheal air column is noted. Volume-rendered images (B,C) and maximum intensity projections, in the axial (D) and sagittal (E) view, of the CT angiography reveals a right-sided aortic arch crossing the midline posterior to the trachea (T) and the oesophagus (E) in the upper mediastinum and further descending on the left side of spine. The first branch from the arch is the LCCA, followed by the RCCA, the RSCA with a Kommerell’s diverticulum (*) arising from the anterosuperior aspect of aorta, on the left side, giving rise to the aberrant LSCA. Moderate compression on the posterior aspect of trachea (T) by the circumflex arch is noted which is also appreciated on the virtual bronchography image (F). DTA, descending thoracic aorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LSCA, left subclavian artery; LVA, left vertebral artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RSCA, right subclavian artery; RVA, right vertebral artery.

A circumflex retroesophageal right aortic arch is an extremely uncommon anomaly. Embryologically, a circumflex right aorta with an aberrant LSCA results from regression of the left dorsal aorta between the left common carotid artery and the LSCA, with the right dorsal aorta forming the distal portion of the arch. It has also been postulated that the third aortic arch gives rise to the proximal aortic arch while the distal arch is formed by the fourth arch, which can explain the elongated transverse arch as well as the relatively higher position of the proximal aortic arch.1 Even in the absence of a ligamentum arteriosum, the circumflex aorta itself, especially if ectatic, can cause symptomatic tracheal compression, as in this case, which makes identification of this anomaly pertinent; as such, patients may require aortic uncrossing procedure, where the distal aortic arch is transected, the retroesophageal segment mobilised and brought anterior to trachea followed by its anastomosis with the ascending aorta.2

Learning points.

  • Circumflex retroesophageal right aortic arch can mimic an aneurysm or a superior mediastinal mass on a chest radiograph.

  • Identification of this anomaly is important as, even in the absence of a ligamentum arteriosum, the circumflex aorta itself, especially if ectatic, can cause symptomatic tracheal compression and such patients may require aortic uncrossing procedure.

Footnotes

NNP, AS, MS and SK contributed equally.

Contributors: All authors have participated sufficiently in the conception of the idea, development of the intellectual content, design, writing and final approval of the manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Hanneman K, Newman B, Chan F. Congenital variants and anomalies of the aortic arch. Radiographics 2017;37:32–51. 10.1148/rg.2017160033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Russell HM, Rastatter JC, Backer CL. The aortic uncrossing procedure for circumflex aorta. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013;18:15–31. 10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2013.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES