Skip to main content
Mycology logoLink to Mycology
. 2016 Feb 16;7(1):1–8. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2015.1136708

Antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi of the Sri Lankan aquatic plant Nymphaea nouchali and chaetoglobosin A and C, produced by the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum

Ranga K Dissanayake a, Pamoda B Ratnaweera a,b, David E Williams b, C Dilrukshi Wijayarathne a, Ravi L C Wijesundera c, Raymond J Andersen b, E Dilip de Silva a,
PMCID: PMC6059152  PMID: 30123610

ABSTRACT

Twenty distinct endophytic fungi were isolated from the surface-sterilized plant parts of Nymphaea nouchali and were identified using morphological and molecular techniques. At 300 µg/disc concentration, eight of the 20 fungal extracts exhibited antimicrobial activities against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778) while two within the eight showed activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 35218). Furthermore, investigation of the crude extract of Chaetomium globosum resulted in the isolation of two known cytochalasans, chaetoglobosin A and C, and their structures were elucidated and confirmed by mass and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (1H, 13C, COSY, HSQC, HMBC and tROESY) spectral data. Chaetoglobosin A showed antibacterial activities against Bacillus subtilis (MIC 16 µg mL−1), Staphylococcus aureus (MIC 32 µg mL−1) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, MIC 32 µg mL−1). This is the first study to report the isolation, identification and antimicrobial properties of endophytic fungi of N. nouchali in Sri Lanka.

KEYWORDS: Endophytic fungi, Nymphaea nouchali, aquatic plant, Chaetomium globosum, antimicrobial, chaetoglobosin A, C

Introduction

Endophytic fungi are ubiquitously found in the internal tissues of all plant species (Strobel and Daisy 2003). Despite the cryptic nature of their symbiotic existence in host plants they have gained recognition as prolific producers of secondary metabolites that have potential in medical and agricultural applications useful to mankind (Aly et al. 2011). However, much of the Earth’s endophytic fungal population, estimated to be in the millions, remains uninvestigated in this respect, making this an exciting frontier for useful discoveries (Cowell 2002). Only a few studies have been carried out so far to evaluate the potential of endophytic fungi inhabiting Sri Lankan biota (Ratnaweera et al. 2014, 2015a). The rich biodiversity with a relatively high level of endemism in distinct ecological settings in Sri Lanka (Myers et al. 2000; Mittermeier et al. 2005) suggests the possibility that the endophytes contained in them may have unique biosynthetic capabilities, leading to the production of unique metabolites with varied biological activities (Ratnaweera et al. 2015b).

Wetland water bodies are considered to be among the most productive ecosystems in the world with diverse forms of life including microorganisms. Aquatic plants or hydrophytes are highly adapted to their environment with unique morphological and physiological features (Yakandawala 2012) and these features are likely to make the aquatic plants unique habitats for the growth of potentially distinctive endophytic fungi. Compared to their terrestrial counterparts endophytic fungi of aquatic plants are far less investigated with respect to secondary metabolite production and their biological activities (Shearer et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2008) and more of such studies are needed to evaluate their true potential in this respect. Nymphaea nouchali (Nil Manel in Sinhalese) is a vulnerable aquatic plant native to Sri Lanka (MOE 2012), found in the inland freshwater bodies, rooted at the bottom, with leaves floating at the surface. The endophytic fungi of N. nouchali or their bioactive metabolites have not been investigated earlier. Hence, in this paper we describe the isolation and identification of the endophytic fungi of the aquatic plant N. nouchali, antimicrobial activities of the ethyl acetate extracts of their laboratory cultures and the bioassay-guided fractionation and structure elucidation, by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS), of the bioactive constituents present in the crude extract of one of the endophytes, Chaetomium globosum.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Healthy specimens of N. nouchali were collected from an unpolluted natural freshwater pond in Udugampola (7.09ʹN & 79.99ʹE), in the Gampaha District, Sri Lanka, in January 2014. The identity of the plant was confirmed and authenticated by comparison with the voucher specimen in the National Herbarium at Royal Botanical Gardens, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. A voucher specimen (No. UOC/PTS/RDNM) of the plant used for the current study was deposited in the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Isolation of the endophytic fungi from N. nouchali

The collected plant specimens were brought to the laboratory in sealed polythene bags and the isolation of endophytic fungi was carried out within 5 hours of collection. First, healthy leaves, stems, sepals and petals of the plant were surface sterilized, by sequentially washing with sterile distilled water (2 min), 70% ethanol (30 sec) and 5% NaOCl solution (1.5 min). Then sterilized plant parts were surface dried with sterile filter paper and cut into 0.5 cm2 segments (40-leaf, 20-stem, 12-petal and 12-sepal segments) and placed on dilute Malt Yeast Agar (dMYA, HIMEDIA) enriched with the antibiotic (Cifroflaxacin 150 mg/L) in Petri dishes under aseptic conditions and incubated at room temperature for several days. The endophytic fungi that emerged from the edges of the plant segments were repeatedly subcultured on antibiotic-free sterile potato dextrose agar (PDA, Hardy-USA) dishes until pure cultures were obtained.

Identification of fungal isolates

Initially the morphological characters (colour, colony surface, colony margin, pattern and pigment exuded) of the fungal isolates were examined. The identification of the fungal isolates was mainly performed using molecular characterization by analysing the DNA sequence of the ITS region of the ribosomal RNA gene. Each fungus sample was cultured in 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) at room temperature. Mycelium of the fungus was filtered and the isolation of genomic DNA from the mycelia of each fungal isolate was carried out according to the published protocol of Kariyawasam et al. (2012). The ITS region of the isolated genomic DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the forward primer ITS 1 (5ʹ TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG 3ʹ) and the reverse primer ITS 4 (5ʹ TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC 3ʹ) under the conditions, initial denaturation of 5 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C and 2 min at 72°C, with a final extension of 7 min at 72°C (Diaz et al. 2012). The amplified DNA was sequenced commercially and was BLAST analysed [National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)]. The acquired gene sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database and accession numbers were obtained. The fungal voucher specimens were preserved on PDA slants at 4°C at the Pathology Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Fermentation, extraction and determination of antimicrobial activity

Each distinct fungal isolate was cultured on six PDA Petri dishes (120 × 20 mm) for 3–5 weeks. When the fungi were close to sporulation, each fungus together with the medium was cut into small pieces and extracted into 200 mL of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) with sonication, filtered and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure (BUCHI-R-200 rotary evaporator). The resulting crude fungal extracts dissolved in methanol were tested against four pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 35218) initially at 300 µg/disc, and the active extracts were further tested at 50 µg/disc concentrations using standard agar disc diffusion assay (NCCLS 2003). [+ve control – Gentamycin (10 µg/disc); -ve control – methanol] Bioassays were conducted in triplicates. After incubation overnight the mean diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded and standard error was calculated using Minitab software. The anti-fungal bioassays of crude fungal extracts were also performed in triplicate using the disc diffusion method against Fusarium oxysporum, Rigidoporus microporus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Aspergillus niger at 300 µg/disc. Ketoconazole and Itraconazole mixture (10 µg/disc from each) was used as the positive control. The growth inhibitions were visually examined by comparing with the positive control.

Fungal strains RDNM-01, −04 and −18 showed the most promising antimicrobial activities and were selected for bioassay-guided fractionations to isolate and characterize the active compounds. This paper describes the results of RDNM-04. Research on the other two species is in progress and will be reported elsewhere. This fungal isolate (RDNM-04) was grown on sterile PDA in 250 Petri dishes (size, 120 × 120 mm) and was incubated for 18 days at 28°C until sporulation. After incubation the fungus was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 1.5 L). The extracts were filtered and the combined EtOAc extract was concentrated in vacuo. The crude extract was tested for antimicrobial activity against the two Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus and B. cereus, at 50 µg/disc concentration using the agar disc diffusion method to confirm the activity. Gentamicin (10 µg/disc) was used as the positive control while methanol was used as the negative control.

Isolation of chaetoglobosin A (1) and C (2) from Chaetomium globosum by bioassay-guided fractionation

The crude EtOAc extract of the fungal strain RDNM-04 was subjected to bioassay-guided chromatographic fractionations with reference to the antibacterial activity against S. aureus and B. cereus. In this process, the initial fractions obtained from column chromatography were analysed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and fractions with similar TLC profiles were combined and the combined fractions were subjected to antibacterial bioassays by disc diffusion to detect the active fractions. First the crude EtOAc extract (2.2 g) was subjected to normal-phase silica gel chromatography (column size 2 × 25 cm) using a gradient elution from hexane, hexane/EtOAc mixtures to EtOAc to give five fractions A to E. Fractions B and C exhibited antibacterial activity. Next the active fraction B (58 mg) was fractionated by another normal phase silica column (1.5 × 35 cm) using gradient elution from hexane/EtOAc, 30:70 to EtOAc/methanol(MeOH), 30:70 to give 20 mg of an active fraction B (RDNM-04-B-B), which was finally purified by size-exclusion chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 (1.5 × 60 cm column, with MeOH:chloroform(CHCl3), 1:1) to obtain the active compound 2 (7.5 mg) as a white amorphous solid, which gave a single spot on TLC.

The second active fraction C (150 mg) from the first normal-phase silica chromatography was also fractionated by a normal-phase silica column (1.5 × 35 cm) using gradient elution from hexane/EtOAc, 30:70 to EtOAc/MeOH, 30:70 to give 65 mg of an active fraction B (RDNM-04-C-B). The final purification of this fraction using Sephadex LH 20 chromatography with MeOH:CHCl3, 1:1 led to the isolation of the pure active compound 1 (15 mg).

Structure elucidation of 1 and 2

The structure determination of the isolated compounds 1 and 2 was performed using mass and NMR spectral data. Low-resolution electrospray ionization quadrupole ion trap MS were recorded on a Bruker-Hewlett Packard 1100 Esquire–LC system mass spectrometer while 1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectral data sets in DMSO-d6 were obtained using a Bruker AV-600 spectrometer with a 5 mm CPTCI cryoprobe.

Antimicrobial MICs of chaetoglobosin A (1) and C (2)

Antimicrobial activity of chaetoglobosin A and C was evaluated against three Gram-positive bacteria, B. subtilis (UBC 344), S. aureus (ATCC 43300) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, ATCC 33591), two Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli (UBC 8161) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), and the pathogenic fungus C. albicans (ATCC 90028). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth micro-dilution method according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards with modification using Mueller Hinton broth as the medium (NCCLS 2002). The MIC end point was taken as the lowest concentration with more than 90% growth inhibition. Optical density of the microbial growth was determined (at 600 nm) using a DTX 880 (Beckman Coulter Inc.) plate reader. The commercial antimicrobial agents polymyxin B for B. subtilis, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, rifamycin for S. aureus and MRSA and amphotericin for C. albicans were used as positive controls (concentration series used: 2.0–0.004 µg mL−1).

Results and discussion

Isolation and identification of the endophytic fungi

Twenty distinct endophytic fungi (eight from leaves, and four each from stems, sepals and petals) were isolated in this study. Their colony morphological characteristics are listed in Table 1. Molecular characterization of the fungal isolates was performed based on the ITS sequence data and the closest BLAST match. According to the BLAST analysis, 19 fungal isolates (all except RDNM-21) showed greater than 97% identity with previously reported fungal species in NCBI Genbank and therefore their identities were established as shown in Table 1. The relevant accession numbers obtained from the NCBI Genbank for the submitted sequences are also given in Table 1.The BLAST results indicated that RDNM-21 is an Endomelanconiopsis sp., with only 86% homology with the reported data for KF746076 (Table 1). The 20 endophytic fungi isolated belong to 12 genera with each genus Fusarium and Colletotrichum having four species, and Endomelanconiopsis and Curvularia having three and two species, respectively, and the rest of the genera present as a single species.

Table 1.

Identities of isolated endophytic fungi with their origin, morphological characters and accession numbers.

No Identification code Origin Morphological characters
Taxon GenBank accession no. Closest blast match (GenBank accession No.) Query/reference ITS length (Similarity%)
Colour Colony surface Colony margin Pattern Pigment exuded
1 RDNM-01 Sepals Yellow Cottony Smooth Zonate No Fusarium solani KP326323 Fusarium solani (KM458800) 539/540(99%)
2 RDNM-03 Leaves Light purple Cottony Restricted Radiate Yellowish brown Fusarium verticillioides KP419975 Fusarium verticillioides (KM434131) 524/525(99%)
3 RDNM-04 Leaves Brown Embedded Irregular Radiate Yellowish brown Chaetomium globosum KP730436 Chaetomium globosum (KM268672) 445/460(97%)
4 RDNM-05 Stem Dark green Sloppy Spreading Irregular No Trichoderma ghanense KP419976 Trichoderma ghanense (KJ807358) 560/560(100%)
5 RDNM-07 Stem Black Embedded Restricted Radiate No Phyllosticta capitalensis KP419977 Phyllosticta capitalensis (KJ883595) 478/478(100%)
6 RDNM-08 Leaves White & Pink Cottony Smooth Zonate No Fusarium sp. KP419978 Fusarium sp. (DQ480359) 527/528(99%)
7 RDNM-09 Stem White Embedded Irregular Radiate No Phomopsis sp. KP684914 Phomopsis sp. (KM510387) 547/548(99%)
8 RDNM-11 Petals White Sticky & Sloppy Irregular Radiate No Colletotrichum gloeosporioides KP730438 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (JQ936214) 550/550(100%)
9 RDNM-13 Leaves Black Cottony Spreading Arachnoid No Neofusicoccum parvum KP730440 Neofusicoccum parvum (KJ193648) 540/541(99%)
10 RDNM-14 Leaves Grey Sloppy Irregular Radiate No Colletotrichum tropicale KP684913 Colletotrichum tropicale
(KM357563)
499/499(100%)
11 RDNM-15 Leaves Grey Sloppy & Sticky Irregular Irregular No Colletotrichum siamense KP684916 Colletotrichum siamense
(KM268865)
541/544(99%)
12 RDNM-16 Stem Dark Brown Velvety Smooth Zonate No Alternaria lonqipes KP684917 Alternaria lonqipes (KJ722535) 548/548(100%)
13 RDNM-17 Sepals White & Grey Sticky Restricted Radiate Yellow Curvularia papendorfii KP684918 Curvularia papendorfii (KC592365) 572/572(100%)
14 RDNM-18 Leaves Brown Cottony Restricted Zonate Light brown Berkleasmium sp. KP684919 Berkleasmium sp. (DQ280263) 501/503(99%)
15 RDNM-19 Stem Black Velvety Smooth Zonate No Curvularia lunata KP730441 Curvularia lunata (KC288113) 574/574(100%)
16 RDNM-20 Leaves Yellowish grey Sloppy Spreading Radiate No Colletotricum capsici KP751931 Colletotricum capsici (KM213014) 524/524(100%)
17 RDNM-21 Stem Greenish grey Sloppy Irregular Radiate Yellowish brown Endomelanconiopsis sp. KP751935 Endomelanconiopsis sp. (KF746076) 436/506(86%)
18 RDNM-22 Sepals Grey Sloppy Irregular Radiate Brown Endomelanconiopsis endophytica KP751932 Endomelanconiopsis endophytica
(GQ469968)
553/559(99%)
19 RDNM-23 Leaves Greenish grey Sloppy Restricted Radiate Yellowish brown Endomelanconiopsis sp. KP751933 Endomelanconiopsis sp. (KJ588255) 504/505(99%)
20 RDNM-24 Petals Dark grey Sloppy Spreading Radiate No Setosphaeria rostrata KP751934 Setosphaeria rostrata (KJ439663) 573/576(99%)

These isolated fungi belong to two Ascomycota classes, Sordariomycetes and Dothideomycetes. Fusarium, Trichoderma, Chaetomium, Colletotrichum and Phomopsis species belong to the class Sordariomycetes, while Berkleasmium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Setosphaeria, Phyllosticta, Neofusicoccum and Endomelanconiopsis belong to class Dothideomycetes. Endomelanconiopsis sp. and Trichoderma sp. are eminent endophytic fungal groups while Fusarium, Colletotrichum, Curvularia and Phomopsis are well known as epiphytes and phytopathogenic fungi although non-pathogenic endophytic forms of these also exist (Strange and Scott 2005; Yeasmin and Shamsi 2013). Some endophytic fungi remain latent inside the host plant without producing any symptoms of disease until the environmental conditions are favourable for the fungus to turn into a pathogenic form (Sieber 2007; Rodriguez and Redman 2008). However, because all the fungi in the current investigation were isolated from healthy plant parts after thorough surface sterilization, the fungi obtained should have existed as endophytic forms during the time they have been isolated.

Antimicrobial activity of the crude endophytic fungal extracts

The antimicrobial activities (mean diameter (± Standard error (SE)) of the inhibition zones) of the crude organic extracts of the isolated endophytic fungi are given in Table 2. Out of the 20 fungal extracts, eight (40%) were active against at least one bacterium tested while 12 (60%) were inactive against all four bacteria examined. Of the eight active extracts, all inhibited the growth of S. aureus and B. cereus at 300 µg/disc while only two extracts (RDNM-01 and RDNM-18) were active against P. aeruginosa and E. coli at this concentration. At 50 µg/disc RDNM-01, RDNM-04, RDNM-18 and RDNM-22 were active against S. aureus and B. cereus while only RDNM-1 and RDNM-18 were active against P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Two endophytic fungal extracts (RDNM-01 and RDNM-18) showed weak inhibitions against R. microporus and F. oxysporum while RDNM-22 showed weak inhibitions only against R. microporus at 300 µg/disc. Accordingly, out of all, Fusarium solani (RDNM-01), Chaetomium globosum (RDNM-04), Berkleasmium sp. (RDNM-18) and Endomelanconiopsis sp. (RDNM-22) can be considered as the endophytic fungi that showed promising antimicrobial activities.

Table 2.

Antibacterial activity of the crude extracts of endophytic fungi of the plant N. nouchali.

Identification No. of Fungi Origin Antibacterial activity (Mean inhibition zone diameter ± Standard error – mm)
S. aureus
B. cereus
P. aeruginosa
E. coli
300 µg/disc 50 µg/disc 300 µg/disc 50 µg/disc 300 µg/disc 50 µg/disc 300 µg/disc 50 µg/disc
RDNM-01 Sepals 17.0 ± 0.2 12.2 ± 1.2 22.0 ± 0.3 12.2 ± 0.8 08.4 ± 0.5 07.0 ± 0.3 15.3 ± 1.4 08.1 ± 0.9
RDNM-04 Leaves 16.5 ± 1.3 13.2 ± 0.5 19.0 ± 0.6 10.1 ± 0.2
RDNM-13 Stem 10.8 ± 0.3 11.3 ± 0.8
RDNM-18 Leaves 25.0 ± 0.2 15.1 ± 1.4 27.3 ± 1.6 16.8 ± 1.1 08.0 ± 0.6 08.0 ± 0.1 20.0 ± 2.3 09.5 ± 0.3
RDNM-20 Leaves 10.0 ± 0.4 12.1 ± 0.1
RDNM-21 Stem 08.4 ± 0.2 08.8 ± 0.5
RDNM-22 Sepals 12.1 ± 0.4 07.3 ± 0.6 14.0 ± 0.9 08 ± 1.0
RDNM-23 Leaves 09.1 ± 0.2 07.6 ± 0.7
+Ve control*   23.1 ± 1.0 21.7 ± 0.9 20.6 ± 0.8 22.3 ± 2.6 19.6 ± 2.1 21.4 ± 1.8 22.4 ± 1.5 24.0 ± 1.9
-Ve control**  

Notes: [* +Ve control – Gentamycin (10 µg/disc), ** – Ve control – methanol]

Structure elucidation of the bioactive metabolite of the C. globosum

The [M + H]+ ion for compound 1 and [M+Na]+ ion for the compound 2 gave an m/z 529 and 551, respectively, in their low-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum, consistent with a molecular weight of 528 daltons for both compounds and a molecular formula of C32H36N2O5. Analysis of 1H, 13C and 2D NMR (COSY, HSQC, HMBC, tROESY) spectral data in DMSO-d6 revealed that the structures of compounds 1 and 2 match those of the known chaetoglobosin A (1) and C (2) (Figure 1), respectively. A comparison of 13C NMR values obtained in the present study for chaetoglobosin A (1) and chaetoglobosin C (2) with already-reported data is given in Table 3 (Sekita et al. 1983). Chaetoglobosin A and C are members of the cytochalasan family of compounds, first isolated from the same fungus Chaetomium globosum from Japan in 1976 together with the chaetoglobosin D, E and F.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Chemical structures of chaetoglobosin A (1) and C (2).

Table 3.

Comparison of 13C NMR data of chaetoglobosin A and C from the present study (in DMSO-d6) with published data (in DMSO-d6) (Sekita et al. 1983).

  1
2
13C δ (ppm)
1
2
C# Reported values Present values Reported values Present values C# Reported values Present values Reported values Present values
1 172.5 172.7 173.8 173.9 17 137.5 137.5 155.6 155.9
2 18 131.5 133.5 130.9 131.1
3 52.1 45.9 52.2 52.4 18’ 10.5 10.6 9.9 10.1
4 45.9 40.1 48.4 48.5 19 81.5 81.6 208.0 208.3
5 35.3 35.2 36.1 36.2 20 200.3 200.4 205.2 205.5
6 57.0 52.2 56.9 56.8 21 135.3 131.6 31.8 31.9
7 61.3 57.0 60.3 60.3 22 133.7 136.0 37.0 37.2
8 46.0 45.8 48.3 48.2 23 199.2 199.5 196.0 196.3
9 62.9 61.2 62.3 62.4 2’ 120.7 124.0 120.8 121.0
10 32.6 32.7 31.9 31.8 3’ 109.1 109.2 108.0 108.0
11 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 3a 127.2 127.1 127.6 127.8
12 19.0 19.1 18.9 19.1 4’ 117.9 120.8 118.2 118.4
13 127.2 127.4 127.0 127.0 5’ 123.9 118.5 125.0 125.6
14 133.2 133.7 133.1 133.1 6’ 118.3 118.1 118.2 118.8
15 40.2 40.0 39.5 39.1 7’ 111.3 111.4 111.2 111.4
16 31.7 31.8 32.5 32.6 1a’ 136.0 136.1 135.8 135.9
16’ 20.8 20.9 19.3 19.4          

Antimicrobial activity of chaetoglobosin A (1) and C (2)

In the present investigation chaetoglobosin A (1) showed good antibacterial activities against Gram-positive B. subtilits (UBC 344), MRSA (ATCC 33591) and S. aureus (ATCC 43300) with MIC values of 16, 32 and 32 µg mL−1, respectively. The MIC for the positive controls, polymixin B, is 8 µg mL−1 for B. subtilis and 0.015 µg mL−1 for rifamycin against S. aureus and MRSA. The MIC values for chaetoglobosin C were >64 µg mL−1 for all the microorganisms tested. This is the first report of antimicrobial activities of chaetoglobosin A and C.

Conclusion

This is the first study to isolate the endophytic fungi of the native aquatic plant N. nouchali and investigation of their antimicrobial activities. This study showed that the aquatic plant N. nouchali harbours many endophytic fungi that are capable of producing antimicrobial substances. Although the chaetoglobosin A and chaetoglobosin C isolated from the fungal extract RDNM-04 proved to be known compounds, the possibility of isolating new biologically active compounds from other active endophytic fungal extracts still remains. Thus it can be concluded that the endophytic fungi of N. nouchali are a valuable potential source for the isolation of bioactive metabolites and more investigations should be performed to realize its true potential.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_material.pdf

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation, Sri Lanka, under the [grant number RG/2012/NRB/01] and the work done at University of British Columbia (UBC) was supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) to RJA.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplement

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2015.1136708.

References

  1. Aly AH, Debbab A, Proksch P.. 2011. Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Appl J Microbiol Biotechnol. 90:1829–1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colwell RR. 2002. Fulfilling the promise of biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 20:215–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diaz PL, Hennell JR, Sucher NJ. 2012. Genomic DNA extraction and barcoding of endophytic fungi In: Sucher NJ, Hennell JR, Carles MC, editors. Plant DNA fingerprinting and barcoding: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology. Science+Buisness Media, Springer; p. 171–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kariyawasam GK, Mithrasen YJPK, Fernando THPS, Wijesundera RLC, Wijesundera WSS. 2012April27 A new cost effective method for extracting genomic DNA from fungi. Abstracts of papers, 5th Annual sessions, Institute of Biochemistry Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Vol. 5; Colombo: Institute of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mittermeier RA, Gil RP, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Fonseca GAB. 2005. Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial eco-regions. Boston, USA: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. MOE 2012. The national red list 2012 of Sri Lanka; conservation status of the fauna and flora. Colombo: Ministry of Environment; p. viii+476. [Google Scholar]
  7. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests, approved standard, document M2-A8. 8th ed. Wayne (PA). [Google Scholar]
  9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing twelfth information supplement, M100-S12. Wayne (PA). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ratnaweera PB, De Silva ED, Williams DE, Andersen RJ. 2015a. Antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi obtained from the arid zone invasive plant Opuntia dillenii and the isolation of equisetin, from endophytic Fusarium sp. BMC Complement Altern Med. 15:220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ratnaweera PB, Williams DE, De Silva ED, Wijesundera RLC, Dalisay DS, Andersen RJ. 2014. Helvolic acid, an antibacterial nortriterpenoid from a fungal endophyte Xylaria sp. of orchid Anoectochilus setaceus endemic to Sri Lanka. Mycol: Int J Fungal Biol. 5:23–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ratnaweera PB, Williams DE, Patrick BO, De Silva ED, Andersen RJ. 2015b. Solanioic acid, an antibacterial degraded steroid produced in culture by the fungus Rhizoctonia solani isolated from tubers of the medicinal plant Cyperus rotundus. Org Lett. 17:2074–2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rodriguez R, Redman R. 2008. More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can’t make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. J Exp Bot. 59:1109–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sekita S, Yoshihira K, Natori S. 1983. Chaetoglobosins, cytotoxic 10-(Indol-3-yl)-[13]cytochalasans from Chaetomium spp. IV. 13C-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectra and their application to a biosynthetic study. Chem Pharm Bull. 31:490–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shearer CA, Descals E, Kohlmeyer B, Kohlmeyer J, Marvanova L, Padgett D, Porter D, Raja HA, Schmit JP, Thorton HA, et al. 2007. Fungal biodiversity in aquatic habitats. Biodivers Conserv. 16:49–67. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sieber TN. 2007. Endophytic fungi in forest trees: are they mutualists? Fungal Biol Rev. 21:75–89. [Google Scholar]
  17. Strange RN, Scott PR. 2005. Plant disease: A threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 43:83–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strobel GA, Daisy B. 2003. Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 67:491–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang L, Dong Y, Song HC, Shen KZ, Wang LM, Sun R, Wang CR, Li GH, Li L, Zhang KQ. 2008. Screening and isolation of antibacterial activities of the fermentative extracts of freshwater fungi from Yunnan Province, China. Ann Microbiol. 58:579–584. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yakandawala D. 2012. Present status of fresh water aquatic flora in Sri Lanka In: Weerakoon DK, Wjesundera S, editors. The national red list 2012 of Sri Lanka; conservation status of the fauna and flora. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Ministry of Environment; p. 186–196. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yeasmin F, Shamsi S. 2013. Phylloplane mycoflora of Gerbera spp. and their pathogenic potentiality. J Bangladesh Acad Sci. 37:211–217. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_material.pdf

Articles from Mycology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES