Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2018 Jul 25;3(4):e00162-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00162-18

The Third Transmembrane Domain of EscR Is Critical for Function of the Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Type III Secretion System

Irit Tseytin a,#, Adi Madar a,#, Bosko Mitrovic a, Wanyin Deng b, B Brett Finlay b, Neta Sal-Man a,
Editor: Paul Dunmanc
PMCID: PMC6060343  PMID: 30045964

Many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that cause life-threatening diseases employ a type III secretion system (T3SS) for their virulence. The T3SS comprises several proteins that assemble into a syringe-like structure dedicated to the injection of bacterial virulence factors into the host cells. Although many T3SS proteins are transmembrane proteins, our knowledge of these proteins is limited mostly to their soluble domains. In this study, we found that the third transmembrane domain (TMD) of EscR, a central protein of the T3SS in enteropathogenic E. coli, contributes to protein self-oligomerization. Moreover, we demonstrated that a single aspartic acid residue, located at the core of this TMD, is critical for the activity of the full-length protein and the function of the entire T3SS, possibly due to its involvement in mediating TMD-TMD interactions. Our findings should encourage the mapping of the entire interactome of the T3SS components, including interactions mediated through their TMDs.

KEYWORDS: enteropathogenic E. coli, export apparatus, inner membrane proteins, transmembrane domain, type III secretion system

ABSTRACT

Many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens utilize a specialized protein delivery system, called the type III secretion system (T3SS), to translocate effector proteins into the host cells. The translocated effectors are crucial for bacterial infection and survival. The base of the T3SS transverses both bacterial membranes and contains an export apparatus that comprises five membrane proteins. Here, we study the export apparatus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and characterize its central component, called the EscR protein. We found that the third transmembrane domain (TMD) of EscR mediates strong self-oligomerization in an isolated genetic reporter system. Replacing this TMD sequence with an alternative hydrophobic sequence within the full-length protein resulted in a complete loss of function of the T3SS, further suggesting that the EscR TMD3 sequence has another functional role in addition to its role as a membrane anchor. Moreover, we found that an aspartic acid residue, located at the core of EscR TMD3, is important for the oligomerization propensity of TMD3 and that a point mutation of this residue within the full-length protein abolishes the T3SS activity and the ability of the bacteria to translocate effectors into host cells.

IMPORTANCE Many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that cause life-threatening diseases employ a type III secretion system (T3SS) for their virulence. The T3SS comprises several proteins that assemble into a syringe-like structure dedicated to the injection of bacterial virulence factors into the host cells. Although many T3SS proteins are transmembrane proteins, our knowledge of these proteins is limited mostly to their soluble domains. In this study, we found that the third transmembrane domain (TMD) of EscR, a central protein of the T3SS in enteropathogenic E. coli, contributes to protein self-oligomerization. Moreover, we demonstrated that a single aspartic acid residue, located at the core of this TMD, is critical for the activity of the full-length protein and the function of the entire T3SS, possibly due to its involvement in mediating TMD-TMD interactions. Our findings should encourage the mapping of the entire interactome of the T3SS components, including interactions mediated through their TMDs.

INTRODUCTION

Many pathogenic bacteria utilize delivery machineries, such as the type III secretion system (T3SS), to inject effector proteins into eukaryotic host cells, where they subvert cellular mechanisms for the benefit of the bacteria. The T3SS forms a syringe-like protein complex that transverses the two bacterial membranes, bridges the extracellular space, and forms a pore in the eukaryotic host cell membrane (14). Translocated effectors support bacterial virulence as they manipulate various cellular processes to prolong bacterial survival and reduce cellular immune responses (5, 6). The T3SS apparatus is well conserved among T3SSs of different pathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and pathogenic Escherichia coli and shares significant similarities with components of the flagellar system (7, 8).

The T3SS of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), the causative agent of pediatric diarrhea (6), forms an ~3.5-MDa complex comprising more than 20 different proteins (9). These proteins assemble into substructures that form, from inside to outside, cytoplasmic rings, an export apparatus, a basal body, an extracellular needle, and a pore-forming complex embedded within the host cell membrane, called a translocon (10, 11). Among these substructures, three (the export apparatus, the basal body, and the translocon) contain transmembrane proteins (reviewed in reference 10).

The export apparatus, found in the central part of the transport channel, is composed of five membrane proteins: EscR, EscS, EscT, EscU, and EscV. Null strains of single genes in the related murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium were found to be nonvirulent as they were defective in their ability to secrete T3SS effectors and translocators, to attach to host cells, and to inject effectors into the host cell cytoplasm (9). All export apparatus proteins are predicted to contain multiple transmembrane domains (TMDs). Combined with the recent stoichiometry study of the Salmonella export apparatus that reported a 5:1:1:1:9 ratio for SpaP-SpaQ-SpaR-SpaS-InvA proteins (12), the estimated number of TMDs found in an export apparatus of a single T3SS complex is over 100. While the cytoplasmic domains of EscU and EscV, and their homologs in T3SSs of other pathogens, were structurally and functionally characterized (1321), our knowledge regarding EscR, EscS, and EscT proteins as well as the TMDs of EscV and EscU is very limited.

In the past, the common dogma was that TM helices merely represent membrane anchors of soluble proteins that facilitate the folding of the proteins across the membrane environment. However, in the last two decades many studies have reported that such helices often have fundamental roles in the assembly and function of TM complexes (2225). This role is often executed by the ability of TMDs to self- or hetero-oligomerize within the membrane, initiating or stabilizing protein oligomerization or complex formation (2631). This essential role is further highlighted by the identification of mutations in TMDs that are associated with severe diseases, ranging from cancer to amyloidal diseases (3236). The involvement of TMDs in protein interactions was recently bolstered by a study showing that proteins of the T3SS export apparatus of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) self- and heterointeract via amino acids localized within the TMDs of the proteins (37).

In this study, we focused on the EscR protein, which was suggested to be the first T3SS protein to localize to the bacterial inner membrane, self-oligomerize, and initiate the assembly of the T3SS complex by interacting with additional export apparatus proteins (37). We characterized the type III secretion and translocation activities of an EPEC escR null mutant as well as strains complemented with labeled versions of escR. We investigated the ability of each individual EscR TMD to support self-oligomerization using a genetic reporter system that converts the interaction of a specific TMD, within its natural membrane, into reporter gene expression. We found that the third TMD of EscR self-oligomerizes and is critical for the proper activity of the T3SS complex. Moreover, we demonstrated that an aspartic acid residue found at the core of TMD3 is critical for TMD-TMD interactions and is crucial for the ability of the bacteria to secrete and translocate effectors into host cells.

RESULTS

The escR gene is critical for T3SS activity and can be complemented by a labeled protein.

It was previously shown that the five T3SS export apparatus proteins of the EPEC-related murine pathogen C. rodentium are critical for T3SS activity, pedestal formation, and infection of host cells (9). In addition, EPEC strains carrying a single gene deletion of escV or escU were previously shown to completely abolish EPEC T3SS activity (21, 38). To examine whether the remaining export apparatus genes, escR, escS, and escT, are critical for EPEC T3SS activity, we generated single mutant EPEC strains and examined their T3SS activity. Wild-type (WT) EPEC, grown under T3SS-inducing conditions, secretes the type III secretion (T3S) translocators EspA, EspB, and EspD into the culture supernatant (Fig. 1A). We observed that the ΔescR EPEC strain, grown under similar conditions, secreted no translocators and displayed a secretion pattern similar to that of the ΔescN EPEC strain, deleted for the T3SS ATPase gene. Similar results were obtained for ΔescS and ΔescT null mutants (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), thus indicating that all export apparatus proteins are crucial for proper T3SS activity.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

C-terminally labeled EscR can complement the ΔescR mutant. (A) Protein secretion profiles of EPEC strains grown under T3SS-inducing conditions: wild type (WT), ΔescN mutant (a T3SS ATPase mutant), ΔescR mutant, chromosomal escR-3HA strain, and ΔescR mutant complemented with EscR-3HA (encoded on either pACYC184 or pSA10). The secreted proteins were concentrated from supernatants of bacterial cultures and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. The T3SS-secreted translocators EspA, EspB, and EspD are indicated on the right of the gel. Also indicated is the location of EspC, which is not secreted by the T3SS. For the ΔescN and ΔescR strains, no T3SS activity was observed. Strains carrying the chromosomal escR-3HA or the plasmids encoding EscR-3HA showed proper T3SS activity. The expression of EscR-3HA was examined by analyzing the bacterial pellets by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody. EscR-3HA expression was detected only for EscR-3HA expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid, pSA10. Numbers at left are molecular masses in kilodaltons. (B) To examine whether pEscR-3HA can complement the ΔescR mutant in a host cell infection model, HeLa cells were infected with EPEC strains: WT, ΔescN, and ΔescR strains and ΔescR strain complemented with pEscR-3HA. After 3 h, cells were washed, and host cell proteins were extracted and subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-JNK and anti-actin (loading control) antibodies. JNK and its degradation fragments are indicated at the right of the gel. WT EPEC showed massive degradation of JNK compared to the uninfected sample and the samples infected with ΔescN or ΔescR mutant strains. The ΔescR strain complemented with pEscR-3HA showed a similar JNK degradation profile as WT EPEC, thus suggesting that pEscR-3HA is functional and therefore fully complements the ΔescR infection phenotype.

FIG S1 

All export apparatus genes are critical for T3SS activity. Protein secretion profiles of wild-type (WT), ΔescR, ΔescS, ΔescT, ΔescU, and ΔescV EPEC strains grown under T3SS-inducing conditions. The secreted proteins were concentrated from supernatants of bacterial cultures and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. The T3SS-secreted translocators EspA, EspB, and EspD are indicated on the right of the gel. Also indicated is the location of EspC, which is not secreted by the T3SS. T3SS activity was observed for the WT EPEC strain but not in any of the mutant strains. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.1 MB (2.2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To examine whether a labeled EscR can maintain T3SS activity, we labeled the chromosomal escR gene with a C-terminal triple-hemagglutinin (3HA) tag and examined its T3SS activity. We observed that the strain showed similar T3SS activity as WT EPEC, but no EscR-3HA expression was detected in the bacterial whole-cell lysates (Fig. 1A). This suggested that native expression levels of EscR are relatively low. To detect EscR expression, we cloned EscR-3HA on a low-copy-number plasmid (pACYC184) and a high-copy-number plasmid (pSA10) and transformed the plasmids into an ΔescR EPEC strain. The strains were grown under T3SS-inducing conditions and were shown to have complemented T3SS activity (Fig. 1A). However, EscR-3HA expression was detected only in the whole-cell lysates of the ΔescR strain transformed with EscR-3HA expressed from the high-copy-number plasmid but not from the low copy-number plasmid (Fig. 1A). These results suggested that the expression level of EscR is highly regulated.

To examine whether overexpression of EscR-3HA interferes with the activity of EPEC in infecting host cells, we examined the ability of the ΔescR strain carrying EscR-3HA to translocate effectors into the host cells. For this purpose, we infected HeLa cells with various EPEC strains (WT, ΔescN, ΔescR, and ΔescR complemented with pEscR-3HA) and examined the cleavage pattern of Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK), a host protein that is cleaved by a translocated EPEC effector, called NleD (39). WT EPEC showed an extensive degradation of JNK, in contrast to the uninfected sample and the samples infected with ΔescN or ΔescR mutant strains (Fig. 1B). The EPEC ΔescR strain complemented with EscR-3HA showed JNK degradation, indicating functional complementation by the vector-encoded, 3HA-labeled EscR protein (Fig. 1B).

The role of EscR TMDs in the activity of the protein.

EscR, as well as the rest of the export apparatus proteins, is a membrane protein found at the center of the inner ring (40, 41). To predict the TMDs of EscR, we analyzed its sequence using TMD prediction software (TMHMM, TMPred, and SACS). Overall, three EscR regions were determined as having high probability to adopt a TMD orientation and an additional region with a medium-high probability was identified (Fig. 2). In this study, we decided to focus on the three strongly predicted TMD sequences, labeled TMD1, -2, and -3 (Fig. 2).

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Prediction of EscR TMDs. Analysis of the EscR sequence for the probability of each amino acid to be localized within the membrane, using the prediction software TMHMM (78). Three clear TMDs (TMDs 1 to 3) were identified, and a fourth, shorter sequence was found to have a high probability to cross the membrane milieu. The sequences of the core TMDs are marked in gray boxes.

TMDs have previously been shown to be involved in self- and hetero-oligomerization of proteins (29, 4245). To assess the ability of single EscR TMDs to mediate self-oligomerization, we utilized the ToxR assembly system, which is designed to detect protein-protein interactions within the membrane of E. coli (Fig. 3A). We used the glycophorin A (GpA) TMD sequence as a positive control for strong homo-oligomerization (4648). The GpA TMD contains a GxxxG motif, which is the most common and the best-characterized motif for interactions of transmembrane helices. The N-terminal TMD of the E. coli aspartate receptor (Tar-1) was used as a reference for moderate oligomerization, as this sequence contains a QxxS motif, which has about 50% self-oligomerization activity relative to the GpA TMD (49). Polyalanine (A16) and 7-leucine-9-alanine (7L9A) sequences were used as controls for nonoligomerizing sequences (50, 51). We observed a strong TMD self-oligomerization activity of EscR TMD3 compared to the activities of the GpA and Tar-1 TMDs, whereas the EscR TMD1 and TMD2 showed significantly lower oligomerization activities than GpA (Fig. 3B). As expected, the oligomerization of both background controls—A16 and 7L9A—was low (Fig. 3B). These findings suggested that the TMD3 of EscR might be involved in EscR self-oligomerization through TMD-TMD interactions. To exclude the possibility that the high self-oligomerization activity of EscR TMD3 was due to the high expression level of the chimera protein, we subjected the bacterial samples to SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting analysis with an anti-maltose binding protein (MBP) antibody. The chimera protein constructs showed comparable expression levels, with A16 and TMD3 constructs having a slightly higher expression level (Fig. 3C). Since the higher expression of the A16 construct did not result in high oligomerization activity, we concluded that the slightly higher expression of the TMD3 construct cannot explain, by itself, the strong oligomerization activity observed for this TMD sequence. To determine the correct integration of the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins into the inner membrane of E. coli, we employed the maltose complementation assay using PD28 bacterial strains carrying the ToxR-TMD-MBP constructs described in Fig. 3A (50). The PD28 strain is deleted for the malE gene, and therefore, it cannot produce endogenous MBP, which is involved in maltose catabolism and supports bacterial growth in minimal medium with maltose as the sole carbon source. Phenotype complementation (growth in maltose-only medium) will be observed only for PD28 strains that express the chimera protein ToxR-TMD-MBP and orient it correctly across the inner membrane, with MBP facing the periplasm. Using this system, we observed that all strains carrying the various ToxR-TMD-MBP constructs demonstrated similar growth rates (indicating proper membrane integration) while the negative control—a chimera protein deleted for its TMD (ΔTM)—showed no growth, as expected (Fig. 3D).

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

TMD3 of EscR promotes TMD self-oligomerization. (A) Schematic illustration of a ToxR assembly system. Oligomerization of the TMDs promotes the activation of the transcription activator ToxR, which binds the ctx promoter and initiates lacZ transcription. The TMD sequences that were inserted between the ToxR transcription activator and the maltose binding protein in the ToxR-TMD-MBP plasmid are presented. (B) FHK12 bacteria expressing a ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera were examined for LacZ activity. The activities of well-characterized dimerizing (GpA and Tar-1) and nondimerizing (A16 and 7L9A) TMDs are also shown. The oligomerization ability of the EscR TMD1 was low, TMD2 had moderate ability, and TMD3 showed very strong TMD oligomerization activity. Bars represent the average (+standard deviation) from at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (**, P < 0.005; *, P < 0.01). (C) Samples of FHK12 cells containing the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins with different TMD sequences were lysed, separated, and immunoblotted using an anti-MBP antibody. The ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera protein (65 kDa) is marked with **, and the endogenous MBP (40 kDa) is marked with *. (D) Correct integration of the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins was tested by assessing their ability to functionally complement the malE deficiency of the PD28 bacterial strain. PD28 bacteria were transformed with plasmids expressing chimera proteins containing the EscR TMD1, TMD2, TMD3, GpA, Tar-1, 7L9A, or A16 or in the absence of a TMD (ΔTM) and were grown in a minimal medium containing maltose. As expected, the ΔTM negative control showed no growth, while all other constructs showed growth, indicating proper membrane integration.

Replacing the EscR TMD3 sequence with a hydrophobic sequence impairs the function of the protein.

To determine whether the EscR TMD3 performs a role in the full-length protein, other than membrane anchoring, we constructed a mutant EscR protein lacking its TMD3 sequence. Since a ΔTMD3 EscR protein will likely have impaired localization or adopt an alternate protein folding compared to the native protein, we had to use an alternative design to study the function of TMD3. For this purpose, we constructed a TMD3-exchanged EscR protein, which had a WT sequence with a replacement of its native core TMD3 sequence (16 amino acids in length) by a hydrophobic sequence composed of seven sequential leucine residues followed by nine alanine residues (7L9A). The core 7L9A sequence, embedded between 5 hydrophobic amino acids of the original TMD, was previously shown to be sufficiently hydrophobic to support protein integration into the membrane, but it cannot support TMD-TMD interactions (51) (Figure 3B). To examine the biological effect of such a replacement, we transformed the TMD3-exchanged EscR (pEscR-TM3ex-3HA) into the escR-null strain (ΔescR) and examined its ability to complement the T3SS activity. We observed that while EscR-3HA complemented the T3SS activity of the ΔescR strain to a level similar to that of WT EPEC, the pEscR-TM3ex-3HA protein showed no T3SS activity (Fig. 4A). Comparable protein expression and similar cellular localization of the EscRWT-3HA protein and its TMD3-exchanged version were verified by Western immunoblotting with an anti-HA antibody (Fig. 4A [lower panel] and B, respectively). These findings indicate that the EscR TMD3 sequence is critical not only for targeting and orienting EscR across the membrane but also for the function of the protein, probably by mediating its correct folding, interaction, and/or assembly.

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

EscR TMD3 is critical for the T3SS activity. (A) Protein secretion profiles of WT, ΔescN, ΔescR, and ΔescR complemented with EscRWT-3HA or EscR-TM3ex-3HA EPEC strains grown under T3SS-inducing conditions. The secreted fractions were treated and analyzed as described in the Fig. 1A legend. Replacement of the TMD3 sequence with a 7L9A sequence completely abolished T3SS activity. The expression of EscRWT-3HA and EscR-TM3ex-3HA was examined by analyzing the bacterial pellets by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody. (B) The ΔescR EPEC strain carrying either EscRWT-3HA or EscR-TM3ex-3HA vector was grown under T3S-inducing conditions and was fractionated into periplasmic (P), cytoplasmic (C), and membrane (M) fractions. The samples were separated on an SDS-PAGE gel and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-HA antibody. To confirm correct bacterial fractionation, the Western blots were probed with anti-MBP (periplasmic marker), anti-DnaK (cytoplasmic marker), and anti-intimin (membrane marker) antibodies.

The aspartic acid residue is critical for EscR TMD3 oligomerization.

A helical wheel presentation of EscR TMD3, which illustrates the location of individual amino acid residues within a sequence that adopts an alpha-helical structure, as expected for most TMDs, showed that 3 polar residues (Y164, D171, and S175) are located on the same helical interface of TMD3 (Fig. 5A). As polar and aromatic residues within the sequence of TMDs have been previously shown to be involved in TMD-TMD interactions (5257), we examined whether these residues are critical for TMD self-oligomerization in EscR. For this purpose, we constructed three vectors expressing ToxR-TMD3-MBP chimera proteins with single point mutations (Y164A, D171A, and S175A; the exact sequences are shown in Fig. 5A) and examined their ability to mediate self-oligomerization. We observed that while the activity of Y164A and S175A mutants was rather similar to that of EscR TMD3 WT, the D171A mutant showed significantly reduced TMD-TMD interaction compared to EscR TMD3 WT or GpA TMD (Fig. 5B). This result suggested that the aspartic acid residue at position 171 is critical for TMD-TMD interactions mediated by TMD3. Correct localization of the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins was examined as described above, and all the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins were shown to be properly integrated within the membrane (Fig. 5C). The expression levels of ToxR-TMD-MBP were examined by subjecting bacterial samples to SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting analysis with an anti-MBP antibody. The expression level of the chimera proteins ToxR-TMD3-MBP of WT, Y164A, and S175A was higher than the GpA TMD (Fig. 5D). This high expression level might provide an explanation for the unusually high activity of these constructs relative to the GpA TMD control. Since the expression level of the ToxR-TMD3-MBP D171A mutant was similar to that of ToxR-GpA-MBP (Fig. 5D), we can exclude the possibility that the low oligomerization activity of the D171A mutant was due to low expression of the chimera protein.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

The aspartic acid residue found in the predicted EscR TMD3 sequence is critical for TMD self-oligomerization. (A) Helical wheel representation of the EscR TMD3 sequence demonstrating that three polar residues (Y164, D171, and S175) localized to one interface. The polar residues are marked with *. The EscR WT TMD3 sequence inserted between ToxR and MBP, as well as the point mutation sequences, is presented in a table. (B) LacZ activity of FHK12 bacteria expressing the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimeras. The activities of well-characterized dimerizing (GpA and Tar-1) and nondimerizing (A16 and 7L9A) TMDs are also shown. A major reduction in the oligomerization activity of EscR TMD3 was observed for the point mutation D171A, while the point mutations Y164A and S175A showed similar oligomerization activity as EscR TMD3 WT sequence. Bars represent the average (+standard deviation) from at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (**, P < 0.005). (C) Correct integration of the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera proteins was examined as described in the Fig. 3D legend. PD28 bacteria were transformed with plasmids expressing chimera proteins containing the EscR TMD3 WT sequence or the Y164A, S175A, or D171A mutation or in the absence of a TMD (ΔTM) and were grown in a minimal medium containing maltose. The ΔTM negative control showed no growth, whereas all the other constructs showed similar growth curves, indicating proper membrane integration. (D) Samples of FHK12 cells containing the ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera protein with WT EscR TMD3 and single mutations were lysed, separated, and immunoblotted using an anti-MBP antibody. The ToxR-TMD-MBP chimera protein (65 kDa) is marked with **, and the endogenous MBP (40 kDa) is marked with *.

A single mutation at the EscR TMD3 abolishes the T3SS activity of EPEC and its ability to translocate effectors into host cells.

To examine the correlation between the oligomerization propensity, observed using the ToxR-TMD-MBP system, and the activity of the full-length EscR protein, we mutated the vector-expressed EscR-3HA to express the Y164A, D171A, or S175S mutant form and examined its ability to complement the T3SS activity of the ΔescR mutant. We found that the point mutation at position 171 abolished T3SS activity while point mutations of tyrosine, at position 164, or serine, at position 175, to alanine exhibited functional T3SS activities (Fig. 6A). To rule out expression defects of the EscR mutant form, we subjected whole-cell lysates to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody. We observed similar expression levels of EscRWT-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, EscRD171A-3HA, and EscRS175A-3HA (Fig. 6A). Next, we examined the ability of the ΔescR strain carrying the mutant forms of EscR to properly translocate bacterial effectors into host cells. We infected HeLa cells with WT EPEC or ΔescN or ΔescR strains carrying either pEscRWT-3HA or pEscR-TM3ex-3HA or the plasmids carrying the single EscR mutants (Y164A, D171A, or S175A). As previously reported, WT EPEC showed extensive degradation of JNK, compared to the uninfected sample and the samples infected with the ΔescN or ΔescR mutant strain (Fig. 1B and 6B). EPEC ΔescR complemented with EscRWT-3HA or with EscR mutated at position 164 or 175 showed similar JNK degradation profiles as observed for WT EPEC, while TMD3-exchanged EscR and EscR mutated at position 171 were not able to translocate effectors into HeLa cells (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that EscR TMD3 and specifically the aspartic acid residue at position 171 are critical for the proper activity of the protein.

FIG 6 .

FIG 6 

The aspartic acid residue found in the predicted EscR TMD3 sequence is critical for T3SS activity and the ability of the bacteria to infect host cells. (A) Protein secretion profiles of EPEC strains grown under T3SS-inducing conditions: WT, ΔescN and ΔescR strains, and ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, EscRD171A-3HA, or EscRS175A-3HA. The secreted fractions were treated and analyzed as described in the Fig. 1A legend. A point mutation at position 171 of EscR TMD3 (D to A) abolished T3SS activity, while point mutations at position 164 or 175 (Y to A or S to A, respectively) demonstrated active T3SS. The expression of EscR-3HA variants was examined by analyzing the bacterial pellets by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody. Numbers at left are molecular masses in kilodaltons. (B) HeLa cells were infected with one of the following EPEC strains: WT, ΔescN or ΔescR strain, or ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, EscRD171A-3HA, or EscRS175A-3HA. JNK and its degradation fragments are indicated at the right of the gel. WT EPEC showed massive degradation of JNK similarly to the ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, or EscRS175A-3HA. However, ΔescR EPEC strains transformed with EscR-TM3ex-3HA or EscRD171A-3HA showed the same JNK pattern as the uninfected sample and the samples infected with ΔescN or ΔescR mutant strains. (C) Membrane protein extracts of WT EPEC and ΔescR mutant complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, or EscRD171A-3HA were incubated in BN sample buffer and then subjected to BN-PAGE (upper panel) and SDS-PAGE (lower panel) and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. (Upper panel) BN-PAGE analysis showed that EscRWT-3HA forms a high-molecular-weight protein complex that is absent from the EscR-TM3ex-3HA and the EscRD171A-3HA samples. We observed only three marker bands in the Western blot of BN-PAGE; therefore, we cannot estimate the size of the complex. (Lower panel) To confirm similar EscR expression levels among the samples, membrane protein extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. Similar protein expression levels were observed.

To determine whether EscR can form large oligomers, similar to its functional homologs, and examine whether this is affected by the replacement of EscR TMD3 sequence or a D171A mutation, we extracted membrane proteins of WT EPEC and the ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, or EscRD171A-3HA. The samples were analyzed by blue native PAGE (BN-PAGE) and Western immunoblotting with an anti-HA antibody. This method was used since repeated attempts to purify the EscR protein in order to examine the oligomerization propensity of the isolated protein were unsuccessful. The membrane protein extract of the ΔescR strain carrying the pEscRWT-3HA vector contained large complexes, which migrated slowly in the BN-PAGE gel, thus supporting EscR oligomerizing behavior (Fig. 6C, upper panel). Since only three marker bands appeared in the Western blot assay of the BN-PAGE (their locations are marked), we were not able to estimate the size of the complexes. The membrane protein extracts of the ΔescR strain carrying pEscR-TM3ex-3HA or pEscRD171A-3HA showed a relatively smeared HA signal that lacked the appearance of a large protein complex as observed for the EscRWT-3HA sample (Fig. 6C, upper panel). Examination of the membrane protein extracts of the ΔescR strain carrying pEscRY164A-3HA showed formation of high-molecular-weight complexes similar to that formed by pEscRWT-3HA, while the membrane protein extract of the ΔescR strain carrying pEscRS171A-3HA showed an intermediate phenotype (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). These results suggested that the replacement of the TMD3 sequence by an alternative hydrophobic domain or a point mutation at the conserved aspartic acid residue altered the ability of the EscR protein to oligomerize. To confirm that the altered running pattern of EscR-TM3ex-3HA and EscRD171A-3HA was not due to lower expression of the mutant forms than of the WT protein, we loaded membrane protein extracts onto an SDS-PAGE gel and analyzed them by Western blotting using anti-HA antibody. We observed similar expression levels of EscRWT-3HA and EscRD171A-3HA, while the EscR-TM3ex-3HA protein showed a higher expression level (Fig. 6C, lower panel). Overall, these results confirmed that replacement of the TMD3 sequence or mutating D171 to alanine reduces the ability of EscR to self- or hetero-oligomerize.

FIG S2 

Oligomer formation of EscR point mutations. Membrane protein extracts of WT EPEC and ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, EscRD171A-3HA, or EscRS175A-3HA were incubated in BN sample buffer and then subjected to BN-PAGE (3 to 8% gradient gel; upper panel) and SDS-PAGE (lower panel) and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. (Upper panel) BN-PAGE analysis showed that EscRWT-3HA and EscRY164A-3HA form a high-molecular-weight protein complex that is absent from the EscR-TM3ex-3HA and the EscRD171A-3HA samples. EPEC ΔescR transformed with pEscRS175A-3HA showed an intermediate phenotype. (Lower panel) To confirm similar EscR expression levels among the samples, membrane protein extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. Similar protein expression levels were observed. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.5 MB (499.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To determine whether nonfunctional EscR constructs (which are unable to complement ΔescR strain T3SS activity) disrupt the T3SS of WT EPEC, we transformed pEscRWT-3HA, pEscR-TM3ex-3HA, or pEscRD171A-3HA into the WT EPEC strain and examined the strains’ T3SS activity. We observed that pEscR-TM3ex-3HA and pEscRD171A-3HA have no dominant negative effect when expressed in the WT EPEC background (Fig. 7A). These results suggested either that the dysfunctional copies of EscR are unable to assemble into the EscR complex due to their mutations or that not all EscR copies within the T3SS complex are required to be functional. To determine whether the aspartic acid residue at position 171 is sufficient to support EscR oligomerization and activity, we mutated the pEscR-TM3ex-3HA construct to contain an aspartic acid at position 171. The resulting construct, pEscR-TM3exD171-3HA, contained a nonfunctional sequence (7L9A) instead of the native TMD3 sequence with a point mutation, A171D. We transformed the plasmid into the ΔescR strain and examined its ability to restore the T3SS activity. We found that the pEscR-TM3exD171-3HA was unable to rescue the T3SS activity, thus suggesting that inserting an aspartic acid residue at position 171 is not sufficient to support proper protein oligomerization and function and that the surrounding TMD sequence contributes to the overall activity (Fig. 7B). Whole-cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody and confirmed expression of all EscR versions (Fig. 7B).

FIG 7 .

FIG 7 

Dysfunctional versions of EscR have no dominant negative effect and cannot be rescued by insertion of an aspartic acid residue into the TMD sequence. (A) Protein secretion profiles of WT and ΔescR EPEC strains transformed with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, or EscRD171A-3HA grown under T3SS-inducing conditions. The secreted fractions were treated and analyzed as described in the Fig. 1A legend. The expression of EscR-3HA variants was examined by analyzing the bacterial pellets by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody. Numbers at left are molecular masses in kilodaltons. (B) Protein secretion profiles of ΔescR EPEC transformed with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, or EscRTM3exD171-3HA grown under T3SS-inducing conditions. The secreted fractions were treated and analyzed as described in the Fig. 1A legend. The expression of EscR-3HA variants was examined by analyzing the bacterial pellets by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody.

DISCUSSION

The export apparatus comprises five membrane proteins, which are highly conserved among T3SSs of different pathogens. The export apparatus was suggested to assemble within the bacterial inner membrane, during the initial steps of the T3SS formation, and to be involved in substrate secretion regulation. While considerable information is available for the EscU and EscV components of the export apparatus, not much is reported for the EscR, EscS, and EscT proteins. In addition, although all export apparatus components are transmembrane proteins and the recent estimation suggested that over 100 TMDs are found in the inner membrane of a single T3SS complex (12), our knowledge about these proteins is limited mostly to their soluble domains. In this study, we focused mostly on the EscR protein and characterized the role of its TMDs in the activity of the protein.

Previous studies indicated that the EscR homologs form homo-oligomers; FliP, of Salmonella flagella, forms a homohexamer (58, 59), and SpaP of the Salmonella T3SS forms a homopentamer (37). Based on these results and the growing number of reports regarding the involvement of TMDs in mediating self-oligomerization within the membrane milieu (23, 29, 31, 45, 60, 61), we examined whether EscR TMDs mediate homo-oligomerization. Using the ToxR system, we identified that the third TMD of EscR (residues 159 to 179 of the EscR sequence) exhibits a strong self-oligomerization activity (Fig. 3B). The TMD3 self-oligomerization demonstrated a similar oligomerization level as the well-characterized GpA TMD. However, while the GpA TMD contains a GxxxG motif, a similar motif was not detected within the EscR TMD3 sequence. To examine whether polar/aromatic residues, which were previously reported to be involved in TMD-TMD interactions (23, 49, 55, 6264), drive EscR TMD3 oligomerization, we mutated a tyrosine residue at position 164 (Y164), an aspartic acid residue at position 171 (D171), and a serine residue at position 175 (S175) to alanine and examined the effect of these single mutations on TMD3 oligomerization. We observed a significant reduction of oligomerization only for the D171A mutation in the EscR TMD3, thus suggesting that this amino acid residue is critical for the TMD self-interaction.

To examine whether the TMD3 is also critical for the activity of the full-length protein, we replaced TMD3 of EscR with a 7L9A sequence and examined whether this EscR TMD3-exchanged form can complement the T3SS activity of an escR mutant strain. Interestingly, we found that replacing the TMD3 sequence with an alternative hydrophobic sequence resulted in a completely nonfunctional T3SS (Fig. 4A). Moreover, this strain was unable to infect HeLa cells (Fig. 6B). These results suggested that the EscR TMD3 sequence has a functional role within the full-length protein, in addition to its role as a membrane anchor. Moreover, a point mutation of the aspartic acid residue at position 171 to alanine, which showed low oligomerization activity within the ToxR-MBP system, has shown an inability to complement the T3SS activity of an ΔescR mutant strain as well as its ability to infect HeLa cells. Protein sequence alignment of EscR with its homologs (FliP of the E. coli flagella, FliP of Salmonella flagella, SpaP of Salmonella SPI-1 T3SS, Spa24 of the Shigella T3SS, YscR of the Yersinia T3SS, and SsaR of Salmonella SPI-2 T3SS) showed high similarity between the proteins and full conservation of the aspartic acid residue at position 171 of EscR (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Such conservation correlates well with our experimental data that this aspartic acid residue within the third TMD of EscR is critical for the activity of the protein. Consistent with our results, a recent study of the EscR homolog in Salmonella, SpaP, showed that a mutation of the aspartic acid residue at position 173 (equivalent to D171 in EscR) to the amber codon (UAG), which encodes an unnatural amino acid (para-benzophenylalanine) (65), resulted in a malfunctioning T3SS (37). Moreover, the authors reported that this aspartic acid residue is involved in SpaP self-interactions.

FIG S3 

Sequence alignment of export apparatus proteins. A standard protein BLAST alignment is presented by ClustalW (8) for FliP of E. coli flagella (P0AC05), FliP of Salmonella flagella (P54700), SpaP of Salmonella SPI-1 T3SS (P40700), SsaR of Salmonella SPI-2 T3SS (A0A0M0Q7P7), Spa24 of Shigella T3SS (P0A1L3), YscR of Yersinia T3SS (P69980), and EscR of EPEC T3SS (B7UMC1). High levels of conservation were observed among the proteins, including a 100% conservation of the aspartic acid residue at position 171 of EscR of EPEC T3SS. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.6 MB (583.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To establish that EscR forms, similarly to its homologs, homo-oligomers, we extracted total membrane proteins from an EPEC ΔescR strain expressing EscRWT-3HA and analyzed it by BN-PAGE. Western blot analysis against the HA tag revealed that EscR forms a high-molecular-weight complex that migrates slowly in the gel. Since the sample is of complete membrane protein extraction, we cannot determine whether the high-molecular-weight band corresponds to homo-oligomers of EscRWT-3HA or to hetero-oligomers of EscR with additional bacterial proteins. Our attempts to purify EscR, using several tags and conditions, to better characterize the EscR-containing oligomers were unsuccessful due to low expression levels of the protein and its strong hydrophobic nature (data not shown). BN-PAGE analysis of membrane extracts of the ΔescR strain expressing either EscR-TM3ex-3HA or EscRD171A-3HA obtained a relatively smeared HA signal that lacked the high-molecular-weight complex that appeared in the EscRWT-3HA sample (Fig. 6C). These results suggested that the third TMD of EscR is involved in the oligomerization of the full-length protein and that, similarly to the isolated ToxR system, the D171 residue is critical for this oligomerization. This information explains the value of having a polar amino acid residue within the membrane environment despite its thermodynamic cost.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the third TMD of EscR does not serve merely as a membrane anchor, as it cannot be replaced by an alternative hydrophobic sequence. Rather, this TMD sequence is involved in mediating EscR self-interactions, which was previously suggested to be the initial oligomerization process during the T3SS assembly (37). Following the formation of the EscR oligomer, hetero-oligomerization with additional export apparatus components can be induced to allow the stabilization of the export apparatus complex. Moreover, our findings establish that the polar aspartic acid residue at position 171 is critical for the activity and function of the full-length protein, possibly due to its involvement in TMD-TMD interaction. Our results, together with previous studies (37, 66, 67) that have reported the role of TMDs of T3SS components in supporting homo- and hetero-interactions as well as their involvement in the activity of the T3SS, should encourage further investigation in mapping the entire interactome of the T3SS components, including interactions that are mediated through the proteins’ TMDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sequences of primers designed and used in this study are given in Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2.

TABLE 1 .

Sequences of primers designed and used in this study

Construct and primer designation Primer sequence (restriction site)a
escR deletion mutant
    ESCR-01F GGAGCTCATACCAGAGGATAAGTTACAGG (SacI)
    ESCR-01R CGCTAGCTATTGGCTGTGAGCCAATGGTC (NheI)
    ESCR-02F CGCTAGCTTCATTCTTGTTGGAGGCTGGC (NheI)
    ESCR-02R GGGTACCTGATATGCGTTCAGTCCTGTG (KpnI)
escS deletion mutant
    ESCS-01F GGAGCTCATACCAGAGGATAAGTTACAGG (SacI)
    ESCS-01R CGCTAGCTTGAACAAAATATCCAGTATCC (NheI)
    ESCS-02F GGCTAGCGAAATGATTCCGAAGGTGAACG (NheI)
    ESCS-02R GGGTACCTGATATGCGTTCAGTCCTGTG (KpnI)
escT deletion mutant
    ESCT-01F GGAGCTCATACCAGAGGATAAGTTACAGG (SacI)
    ESCT-01R CGCTAGCAAATGATGATACTATGACCGTC (NheI)
    ESCT-02F CGCTAGCACGGCAAATATTCATTCTGAC (NheI)
    ESCT-02R GGGTACCTGATATGCGTTCAGTCCTGTG (KpnI)
EscR-3HA cloning in pSA10
    EscR-3HA-F TTTCACACAGGAAACAGATGTCTCAATTAATGACCATTGGCTCAC
    EscR-3HA-R1 AGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAATTCACCACCAACAGAAATTCG
    EscR-3HA-R2 GATCCCCGGGAATTTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAAGCGTAATCTGG
    pSA10_Gib_F AATTCCCGGGGATCCGTCG
    pSA10_Gib_R CTGTTTCCTGTGTGAAATTGTTATCCG
EscR-3HA cloning in pACYC184
    EscR-3HA-184_F CCAGGATGAATAAAATTTAAAAATGTCTCAATTAATGACCATTG
    EscR-3HA-184_R CAAGGGCATCGGTCGACTCCCCGGGAATTTCAAGC
    pACYC_Gib_F GTCGACCGATGCCCTTG
    pACYC_Gib_R TTTTAAATTTTATTCATCCTGGTGGTTG
Labeling chromosomal EscR with 3HA
    EscR-3HA-Chr-F ATGTCTCAATTAATGACCATTGGC
    EscR-3HA-Chr-R GGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCCCGGGAATTTCAAGCG
    ESCR-03F CCAAGCTTCTTCTAGAGGTACCTTGACATTCAATGCCCTG
    ESCR-03R GGTCATTAATTGAGACATATCATC
    ESCR-04F TCCGTCGACCTGCAGCCGATGGATACTGGATATTTTGTTC
    ESCR-04R AGCTCGATATCGCATGCGTCTATTGTCGTATTAACTAACCC
    pRE112_Gib_F GCATGCGATATCGAGCTC
    pRE112_Gib_R GGTACCTCTAGAAGAAGCTTG
TMD3-ex EscR
    7L9A-F CTGTTGCTACTCTTACTCCTTGCGGCCGCAGCGGCTGCAGCGGCAGCC
    7L9A-R GGCTGCCGCTGCAGCCGCTGCGGCCGCAAGGAGTAAGAGTAGCAACAG
    EscR_7L9A_F CATCATACCCAAGGCCAATAAGGCTGCCGCTGCAGCCGCTGCGGC
    EscR_7L9A_R GCTGCATTCAAGATAGGTTTTCTGTTGCTACTCTTACTCCTTGCGGCC
    EscR_Gib_F CGGATAACAATTTCACACAGGAAACAGATGTCTCAATTAATG
    EscR_Gib161_R GAGTAAGAGTAGCAACAGAAAACCTATCTTGAATGCAGC
    EscR_7L9A_Gib_R CATCATACCCAAGGCCAATAAGGCTGCCGCTGCAGCCGC
    pSA10_EscR_TM3_7L9A_F TTATTGGCCTTGGGTATGATGATGGTATCG
pEscR-TM3exD171-3HA
    L171D_F CTCTTACTCCTTGCGGCCGACGCGGCTGCAGCGGCAGCC
    L171D_R GGCTGCCGCTGCAGCCGCGTCGGCCGCAAGGAGTAAGAG
TMD3 point mutants
    Y164F (ToxR) GCTAGCTTGCTCGCTTTACCCTTTATTGCG
    Y164R (ToxR) CGCAATAAAGGGTAAAGCGAGCAAGCTAGCTCG
    Y164F (EscR) CAAGATAGGTTTTTTGCTCGCTTTACCCTTTATTGCG
    Y164R (EscR) CGCAATAAAGGGTAAAGCGAGCAAAAAACCTATCTTG
    D171F CCCTTTATTGCGATAGCTTTGATCATTTCCAATATC
    D171R GATATTGGAAATGATCAAAGCTATCGCAATAAAGGG
    S175F (ToxR) GATTTGATCATTGCTAATATCTTATTG
    S175R (ToxR) CAATAAGATATTAGCAATGATCAAATC
    S175F (EscR) CGATAGATTTGATCATTGCCAATATCTTATTGGCCTTGG
    S175R (EscR) CCAAGGCCAATAAGATATTGGCAATGATCAAATCTATCG
ToxR-TMD1-MBP
    EscR_TMD1_F CTAGCATTATTGTATTTTTTCTGTTATCATTACTGCCAATATTTGTTGTTATTGG
    EscR_TMD1_R GATCCCAATAACAACAAATATTGGCAGTAATGATAACAGAAAAAATACAATAATG
ToxR-TMD2-MBP
    EscR_TMD2_F CTAGCACATCAGTGTCTTTGATACTGACAATGTTTATTATGTCTCCGATAATAGG
    EscR_TMD2_R GATCCCTATTATCGGAGACATAATAAACATTGTCAGTATCAAAGACACTGATGTG
ToxR-TMD3-MBP
    EscR_TMD3_F CTAGCTTGCTCTATTTACCCTTTATTGCGATAGATTTGATCATTTCCAATATCGG
    EscR_TMD3_R GATCCCGATATTGGAAATGATCAAATCTATCGCAATAAAGGGTAAATAGAGCAAG
a

Restriction sites are underlined in primer sequences.

TABLE 2 .

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Description Reference
Strains
    Wild-type EPEC EPEC strain E2348/69, streptomycin resistant 68
    EPEC ΔescR Nonpolar deletion of escR This study
    EPEC ΔescS Nonpolar deletion of escS This study
    EPEC ΔescT Nonpolar deletion of escT This study
    EPEC ΔescN Nonpolar deletion of escN 38
    EPEC ΔescV Nonpolar deletion of escV 38
    EPEC ΔescU Nonpolar deletion of escU 21
    E. coli DH10B For plasmid handling 79
    E. coli FHK12 E. coli strain in which ctx promoter was fused to lacZ gene 72
    E. coli PD28 malE-deficient E. coli strain 77
    E. coli SM10λpir Conjugating bacteria 80
    EPEC escR-3HA 3HA C-terminally tagged chromosomal escR This study
Plasmids
    pEscRWT-3HA (pACYC184) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR in pACYC184 This study
    pEscRWT-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR in pSA10 This study
    pEscR-TM3ex-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR with 7L9A sequence instead of original TMD3 in pSA10 This study
    pEscR-TM3exD171-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR with 7L9A sequence instead of original TMD3 with aspartic acid in position 171 This study
    EscRY164A-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR with Y164A mutation in pSA10 This study
    EscRD171A-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR with D171A mutation in pSA10 This study
    EscRS175A-3HA (pSA10) 3HA C-terminally tagged EscR with S175A mutation in pSA10 This study
    ToxR-GpA-MBP GpA TMD sequence inserted between ToxR and MBP 50
    ToxR-Tar-1-MBP N-terminal TMD of E. coli Tar sequenc inserted between ToxR and MBP 49
    ToxR-A16-MBP Sequence of 16 alanine residues inserted between ToxR and MBP 50
    ToxR-7L9A-MBP Sequence of 7 leucine residues and 9 alanine residues inserted between ToxR and MBP 51
    ToxR-TMD1-MBP First TMD sequence of EscR inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    ToxR-TMD2-MBP Second TMD sequence of EscR inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    ToxR-TMD3-MBP Third TMD sequence of EscR inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    ToxR-TMD3Y164A-MBP Third TMD sequence of EscR with Y164A mutation inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    ToxR-TMD3D171A-MBP Third TMD sequence of EscR with D171A mutation inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    ToxR-TMD3S175A-MBP Third TMD sequence of EscR with S175A mutation inserted between ToxR and MBP This study
    pACYC184 Cloning vector, Cmr Tcr 81
    pSA10 pKK177-3 derivative containing lacIq 82
    pRE112 Suicide vector for allelic exchange, Cmr 83

Bacterial strains.

The wild-type EPEC O127:H6 strain E2348/69 (a streptomycin-resistant strain) was used to assess the activity of the T3SS (68), and the E. coli DH10B strain was used for plasmid handling (Table 2). All strains were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Sigma) supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 50 µg/ml ampicillin, and 30 µg/ml chloramphenicol.

Construction of null mutants and plasmids used in this study.

The details of the cloning processes are described in Text S1 in the supplemental material.

TEXT S1 

Detailed description of the construction of single null mutants and all plasmids used in this study and the membrane protein extraction method. Download TEXT S1, DOCX file, 0.04 MB (39.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Secretion assay.

To determine T3SS activity, EPEC strains were grown overnight in LB broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics in a shaker at 37°C. The cultures were diluted 1:50 into Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Biological Industries), preheated overnight in a CO2 tissue culture incubator, and grown statically supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics for 6 h in a tissue culture incubator (with 5% CO2) to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.7. The cultures were then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 5 min to remove the bacteria, the pellet was dissolved in the SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the supernatant was collected and then filtered through a 0.22-µm filter (Millipore). The supernatant was then precipitated with 10% (vol/vol) trichloroacetic acid overnight at 4°C to concentrate proteins secreted into the culture medium. The volume of the supernatants was normalized to the bacterial culture OD600 to ensure equal loading of the samples. The samples were then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, the precipitates of the secreted proteins were dissolved in the SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the residual trichloroacetic acid was neutralized with saturated Tris. The proteins were analyzed on SDS-12% PAGE gels and stained with Coomassie blue.

Translocation activity.

To determine the ability of EPEC strains to translocate effectors into host cells, we performed translocation assays as previously described (39). Briefly, HeLa cells were infected for 3 h with EPEC strains (WT, ΔescN, ΔescR, and ΔescR complemented with EscRWT-3HA, pEscR-TM3ex-3HA, pEscRY64A-3HA, pEscRD171A-3HA, or pEscRS175A-3HA) that were preinduced for 3 h for T3SS activity in preheated DMEM, statically, in a CO2 tissue culture incubator. HeLa cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), collected, and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer. The samples were centrifuged at maximum speed for 5 min to remove unlysed cells, and the supernatants were collected, mixed with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-JNK and anti-actin antibodies (loading control). An uninfected sample and the ΔescN mutant strain-infected sample were used as negative controls.

Immunoblotting.

Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (pore size, 0.45 µm; Bio-Rad) or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) (Mercury; Millipore). The blots were blocked for 1 h in 5% (wt/vol) skim milk-PBST (0.1% Tween in phosphate-buffered saline), incubated with the primary antibody (diluted in 5% skim milk-PBST for 1 h at room temperature, unless indicated otherwise) and then with the secondary antibody (diluted in 5% skim milk-PBST for 1 h at room temperature), and detected with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Biological Industries). The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-HA (Abcam), diluted 1:1,000; rabbit anti-MBP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), diluted 1:1,000; mouse anti-DnaK (Abcam); rabbit anti-intimin, diluted 1:2,000; mouse anti-JNK (BD Pharmingen), diluted 1:1,000 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS); and mouse anti-actin (MPBio), diluted 1:10,000. The following secondary antibodies were used: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Abcam), diluted 1:5,000, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam), diluted 1:5,000.

Detection of the homo-oligomerization of TMDs within the membrane.

The ToxR transcription activator can be successfully used to assess protein-protein interactions within the E. coli membrane (69). DNA cassettes, encoding single TMDs of EscR (TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3), E. coli aspartate receptor N-terminal TMD (Tar-1), glycophorin A (GpA) TMD, 16-alanine backbone (A16), 7-leucine-9-alanine backbone (7L9A), and no TMD (ΔTM), were grafted between the cytoplasmic domain of the ToxR transcription activator protein (an oligomerization-dependent transcriptional activator) and the periplasmic moiety of the maltose binding protein (MBP). The presence of the MBP moiety directs the localization of the chimera protein to the periplasm (70, 71) and, therefore, assists the TMD to become embedded within the inner membrane. In the assay, the ToxR-TMD-MBP plasmids, containing different TMDs, were transformed into E. coli FHK12 cells (72), which contain a reporter gene, coding for β-galactosidase, under the control of the ctx promoter. Oligomerization of the investigated TMD results in association of the ToxR transcription activator, which only then becomes active and can bind the ctx promoter to initiate transcription of a downstream reporter gene, lacZ (69, 73). Quantification of oligomerization is performed by calculating the activity of β-galactosidase, namely, by measuring the levels of a yellow color (OD405) associated with the cleavage product of the β-galactosidase substrate o-nitrophenylgalactose (ONPG) (23, 50, 51). Monitoring the activity of β-galactosidase for 20 min, at intervals of 30 s, yields the Vmax of the reaction and is presented as Miller units when normalized to the original cell content (measured at OD600). We used the GpA TMD sequence as a positive control for strong homo-oligomerization (4648), the N-terminal TMD of the E. coli aspartate receptor (Tar-1) as a reference for moderate oligomerization (49), and the A16 and 7L9A sequences as controls for nonoligomerizing sequences (51, 7476).

Maltose complementation assay.

Membrane insertion and correct orientation of the chimera proteins were examined as described previously (50). Briefly, PD28 cells (a malE-deficient E. coli strain [77]) transformed with the different ToxR-TMD-MBP plasmids were cultured overnight. The overnight cultures were washed twice with PBS and then used to inoculate M9 minimal medium supplemented with 0.4% maltose and chloramphenicol. Bacterial growth was measured at different time points by a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. Since PD28 cells are unable to grow on minimal medium containing maltose as the only carbon source, only cells that expressed the chimera protein in the correct orientation, where the TMD is embedded within the inner membrane and the MBP faces the periplasm, were able to utilize maltose and support cell growth. A construct with a deleted TMD (ΔTMD) served as a negative control, since the chimera protein was expected to reside in the cytoplasm and, therefore, was unable to compensate for the malE deficiency.

Bacterial fractionation.

Bacterial cell fractionation was based on previously described procedures (38). Briefly, EPEC strains from an overnight culture were subcultured 1:50 in 50 ml of DMEM for 6 h at 37°C in a CO2 tissue culture incubator. The cultures were harvested, washed in PBS, resuspended in 1 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 20% [wt/vol] sucrose, protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Applied Science], and lysozyme [100 µg/ml]), and incubated for 30 min at room temperature to generate spheroplasts. MgCl2 was then added to a final concentration of 20 mM, and samples were spun for 10 min at 5,000 × g. The supernatants containing the periplasmic fractions were collected. The pellets, which contained the cytoplasm and the membrane fractions, were resuspended in 1 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol with protease inhibitors). All subsequent steps were carried out at 4°C. Ten micrograms of RNase A and DNase I per milliliter was added, and the samples were sonicated (Fisher Scientific; 3 times for 15 s each). Intact bacteria were removed by centrifugation (at 2,300 × g for 15 min), and the cleared supernatants containing cytoplasmic and membrane proteins were transferred to new tubes. To obtain the cytoplasmic fraction, supernatants were centrifuged (in a Beckman Optima XE-90 ultracentrifuge with an SW60 Ti rotor) for 30 min at 100,000 × g to pellet the membranes. The supernatants containing the cytoplasmic fraction were collected, the pellets containing the membrane fractions were washed with lysis buffer, and the final pellets were resuspended in 0.1 ml lysis buffer with 0.1% SDS. The protein contents of all samples were determined using the Coomassie Plus protein assay (Thermo Scientific) before adding SDS-PAGE sample buffer with β-mercaptoethanol.

Membrane protein extraction.

Bacterial membranes were purified as described previously (38). Details are given in Text S1 in the supplemental material.

BN-PAGE.

Extracted membrane proteins were incubated for 5 min in the blue native (BN) sample buffer (30% glycerol with 0.05% Coomassie brilliant blue G-250) and loaded onto a 4 to 20% gradient native gel. For electrophoresis, the cathode buffer was 15 mM Bis-Tris and 50 mM Bicine (adjusted to pH 7) and the anode buffer comprised 50 mM Bis-Tris (adjusted to pH 7). The electrophoresis was carried out in ice until full separation (5 to 6 h). The gel was then subjected to Western immunoblotting with an anti-HA antibody.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. Langosch from the Technische Universität München, who provided the ToxR-GPA-MBP and ToxR-A16-MBP plasmids and the FHK12 and PD28 E. coli strains. We also thank the members of the Sal-Man laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript.

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 559/15) (N.S.-M.) and operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (B.B.F.). B.B.F. is the University of British Columbia Peter Wall Distinguished Professor.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blocker A, Jouihri N, Larquet E, Gounon P, Ebel F, Parsot C, Sansonetti P, Allaoui A. 2001. Structure and composition of the Shigella flexneri “needle complex,” a part of its type III secreton. Mol Microbiol 39:652–663. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kimbrough TG, Miller SI. 2000. Contribution of Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion components to needle complex formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11008–11013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200209497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kubori T, Matsushima Y, Nakamura D, Uralil J, Lara-Tejero M, Sukhan A, Galán JE, Aizawa SI. 1998. Supramolecular structure of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Science 280:602–605. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5363.602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanowar S, Singh P, Pfuetzner RA, André I, Zheng H, Spreter T, Strynadka NC, Gonen T, Baker D, Goodlett DR, Miller SI. 2010. Interactions of the transmembrane polymeric rings of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III secretion system. mBio 1:e00158-10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00158-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bhavsar AP, Guttman JA, Finlay BB. 2007. Manipulation of host-cell pathways by bacterial pathogens. Nature 449:827–834. doi: 10.1038/nature06247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Croxen MA, Finlay BB. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:26–38. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aizawa SI. 2001. Bacterial flagella and type III secretion systems. FEMS Microbiol Lett 202:157–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cornelis GR, Van Gijsegem F. 2000. Assembly and function of type III secretory systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:735–774. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deng W, Puente JL, Gruenheid S, Li Y, Vallance BA, Vázquez A, Barba J, Ibarra JA, O’Donnell P, Metalnikov P, Ashman K, Lee S, Goode D, Pawson T, Finlay BB. 2004. Dissecting virulence: systematic and functional analyses of a pathogenicity island. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:3597–3602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400326101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gaytán MO, Martínez-Santos VI, Soto E, González-Pedrajo B. 2016. Type three secretion system in attaching and effacing pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:129. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Notti RQ, Stebbins CE. 2016. The structure and function of type III secretion systems. Microbiol Spectr 4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0004-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zilkenat S, Franz-Wachtel M, Stierhof YD, Galán JE, Macek B, Wagner S. 2016. Determination of the stoichiometry of the complete bacterial type III secretion needle complex using a combined quantitative proteomic approach. Mol Cell Proteomics 15:1598–1609. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.056598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abrusci P, Vergara-Irigaray M, Johnson S, Beeby MD, Hendrixson DR, Roversi P, Friede ME, Deane JE, Jensen GJ, Tang CM, Lea SM. 2013. Architecture of the major component of the type III secretion system export apparatus. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:99–104. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Allaoui A, Woestyn S, Sluiters C, Cornelis GR. 1994. YscU, a Yersinia enterocolitica inner membrane protein involved in Yop secretion. J Bacteriol 176:4534–4542. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4534-4542.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bange G, Kümmerer N, Engel C, Bozkurt G, Wild K, Sinning I. 2010. FlhA provides the adaptor for coordinated delivery of late flagella building blocks to the type III secretion system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11295–11300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001383107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hirano T, Mizuno S, Aizawa S, Hughes KT. 2009. Mutations in flk, flgG, flhA, and flhE that affect the flagellar type III secretion specificity switch in Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 191:3938–3949. doi: 10.1128/JB.01811-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lilic M, Quezada CM, Stebbins CE. 2010. A conserved domain in type III secretion links the cytoplasmic domain of InvA to elements of the basal body. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:709–713. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910010796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Minamino T, Shimada M, Okabe M, Saijo-Hamano Y, Imada K, Kihara M, Namba K. 2010. Role of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of FlhA in bacterial flagellar type III protein export. J Bacteriol 192:1929–1936. doi: 10.1128/JB.01328-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thomassin JL, He X, Thomas NA. 2011. Role of EscU auto-cleavage in promoting type III effector translocation into host cells by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 11:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Worrall LJ, Vuckovic M, Strynadka NC. 2010. Crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of the Salmonella type III secretion system export apparatus protein InvA. Protein Sci 19:1091–1096. doi: 10.1002/pro.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zarivach R, Deng W, Vuckovic M, Felise HB, Nguyen HV, Miller SI, Finlay BB, Strynadka NC. 2008. Structural analysis of the essential self-cleaving type III secretion proteins EscU and SpaS. Nature 453:124–127. doi: 10.1038/nature06832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cymer F, Veerappan A, Schneider D. 2012. Transmembrane helix-helix interactions are modulated by the sequence context and by lipid bilayer properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:963–973. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fink A, Sal-Man N, Gerber D, Shai Y. 2012. Transmembrane domains interactions within the membrane milieu: principles, advances and challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:974–983. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li E, Wimley WC, Hristova K. 2012. Transmembrane helix dimerization: beyond the search for sequence motifs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:183–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.08.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teese MG, Langosch D. 2015. Role of GxxxG motifs in transmembrane domain interactions. Biochemistry 54:5125–5135. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chavent M, Chetwynd AP, Stansfeld PJ, Sansom MS. 2014. Dimerization of the EphA1 receptor tyrosine kinase transmembrane domain: insights into the mechanism of receptor activation. Biochemistry 53:6641–6652. doi: 10.1021/bi500800x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kwon MJ, Choi Y, Yun JH, Lee W, Han IO, Oh ES. 2015. A unique phenylalanine in the transmembrane domain strengthens homodimerization of the syndecan-2 transmembrane domain and functionally regulates syndecan-2. J Biol Chem 290:5772–5782. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.599845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kwon MJ, Park J, Jang S, Eom CY, Oh ES. 2016. The conserved phenylalanine in the transmembrane domain enhances heteromeric interactions of syndecans. J Biol Chem 291:872–881. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.685040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mo X, Liu L, López JA, Li R. 2012. Transmembrane domains are critical to the interaction between platelet glycoprotein V and glycoprotein Ib-IX complex. J Thromb Haemost 10:1875–1886. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04841.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reuven EM, Ali M, Rotem E, Schwarzer R, Gramatica A, Futerman AH, Shai Y. 2014. The HIV-1 envelope transmembrane domain binds TLR2 through a distinct dimerization motif and inhibits TLR2-mediated responses. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004248. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Soetandyo N, Wang Q, Ye Y, Li L. 2010. Role of intramembrane charged residues in the quality control of unassembled T-cell receptor alpha-chains at the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci 123:1031–1038. doi: 10.1242/jcs.059758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheung JC, Deber CM. 2008. Misfolding of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and disease. Biochemistry 47:1465–1473. doi: 10.1021/bi702209s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He Y, Wertheim JA, Xu L, Miller JP, Karnell FG, Choi JK, Ren R, Pear WS. 2002. The coiled-coil domain and Tyr177 of bcr are required to induce a murine chronic myelogenous leukemia-like disease by bcr/abl. Blood 99:2957–2968. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.8.2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Therien AG, Deber CM. 2002. Oligomerization of a peptide derived from the transmembrane region of the sodium pump gamma subunit: effect of the pathological mutation G41R. J Mol Biol 322:583–590. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00781-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang WJ, Russo SJ, Mulugeta S, Beers MF. 2002. Biosynthesis of surfactant protein C (SP-C). Sorting of SP-C proprotein involves homomeric association via a signal anchor domain. J Biol Chem 277:19929–19937. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201537200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu J, Bakhos L, Chang L, Holterman MJ, Klein WL, Venton DL. 2002. Per-6-substituted beta-cyclodextrin libraries inhibit formation of beta-amyloid-peptide (A beta)-derived, soluble oligomers. J Mol Neurosci 19:51–55. doi: 10.1007/s12031-002-0010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dietsche T, Tesfazgi Mebrhatu M, Brunner MJ, Abrusci P, Yan J, Franz-Wachtel M, Schärfe C, Zilkenat S, Grin I, Galán JE, Kohlbacher O, Lea S, Macek B, Marlovits TC, Robinson CV, Wagner S. 2016. Structural and functional characterization of the bacterial type III secretion export apparatus. PLoS Pathog 12:e1006071. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gauthier A, Puente JL, Finlay BB. 2003. Secretin of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system requires components of the type III apparatus for assembly and localization. Infect Immun 71:3310–3319. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3310-3319.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Baruch K, Gur-Arie L, Nadler C, Koby S, Yerushalmi G, Ben-Neriah Y, Yogev O, Shaulian E, Guttman C, Zarivach R, Rosenshine I. 2011. Metalloprotease type III effectors that specifically cleave JNK and NF-kappaB. EMBO J 30:221–231. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fan F, Ohnishi K, Francis NR, Macnab RM. 1997. The FliP and FliR proteins of Salmonella typhimurium, putative components of the type III flagellar export apparatus, are located in the flagellar basal body. Mol Microbiol 26:1035–1046. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6412010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wagner S, Königsmaier L, Lara-Tejero M, Lefebre M, Marlovits TC, Galán JE. 2010. Organization and coordinated assembly of the type III secretion export apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:17745–17750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008053107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anbazhagan V, Schneider D. 2010. The membrane environment modulates self-association of the human GpA domain—implications for membrane protein folding and transmembrane signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1798:1899–1907. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reuven EM, Fink A, Shai Y. 2014. Regulation of innate immune responses by transmembrane interactions: lessons from the TLR family. Biochim Biophys Acta 1838:1586–1593. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee SP, Xie Z, Varghese G, Nguyen T, O’Dowd BF, George SR. 2000. Oligomerization of dopamine and serotonin receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:S32–S40. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00155-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Park S, Meyer M, Jones AD, Yennawar HP, Yennawar NH, Nixon BT. 2002. Two-component signaling in the AAA + ATPase DctD: binding Mg2+ and BeF3- selects between alternate dimeric states of the receiver domain. FASEB J 16:1964–1966. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0395fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adair BD, Engelman DM. 1994. Glycophorin A helical transmembrane domains dimerize in phospholipid bilayers: a resonance energy transfer study. Biochemistry 33:5539–5544. doi: 10.1021/bi00184a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lemmon MA, Flanagan JM, Hunt JF, Adair BD, Bormann BJ, Dempsey CE, Engelman DM. 1992. Glycophorin A dimerization is driven by specific interactions between transmembrane alpha-helices. J Biol Chem 267:7683–7689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Russ WP, Engelman DM. 2000. The GxxxG motif: a framework for transmembrane helix-helix association. J Mol Biol 296:911–919. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sal-Man N, Gerber D, Shai Y. 2004. The composition rather than position of polar residues (QxxS) drives aspartate receptor transmembrane domain dimerization in vivo. Biochemistry 43:2309–2313. doi: 10.1021/bi0356294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Langosch D, Brosig B, Kolmar H, Fritz HJ. 1996. Dimerisation of the glycophorin A transmembrane segment in membranes probed with the ToxR transcription activator. J Mol Biol 263:525–530. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sal-Man N, Gerber D, Shai Y. 2005. The identification of a minimal dimerization motif QXXS that enables homo- and hetero-association of transmembrane helices in vivo. J Biol Chem 280:27449–27457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503095200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bañó-Polo M, Martínez-Gil L, Wallner B, Nieva JL, Elofsson A, Mingarro I. 2013. Charge pair interactions in transmembrane helices and turn propensity of the connecting sequence promote helical hairpin insertion. J Mol Biol 425:830–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chin CN, von Heijne G. 2000. Charge pair interactions in a model transmembrane helix in the ER membrane. J Mol Biol 303:1–5. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Curran AR, Engelman DM. 2003. Sequence motifs, polar interactions and conformational changes in helical membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:412–417. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Herrmann JR, Fuchs A, Panitz JC, Eckert T, Unterreitmeier S, Frishman D, Langosch D. 2010. Ionic interactions promote transmembrane helix-helix association depending on sequence context. J Mol Biol 396:452–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sal-Man N, Gerber D, Bloch I, Shai Y. 2007. Specificity in transmembrane helix-helix interactions mediated by aromatic residues. J Biol Chem 282:19753–19761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610368200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Walther TH, Ulrich AS. 2014. Transmembrane helix assembly and the role of salt bridges. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fabiani FD, Renault TT, Peters B, Dietsche T, Gálvez EJC, Guse A, Freier K, Charpentier E, Strowig T, Franz-Wachtel M, Macek B, Wagner S, Hensel M, Erhardt M. 2017. A flagellum-specific chaperone facilitates assembly of the core type III export apparatus of the bacterial flagellum. PLoS Biol 15:e2002267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fukumura T, Makino F, Dietsche T, Kinoshita M, Kato T, Wagner S, Namba K, Imada K, Minamino T. 2017. Assembly and stoichiometry of the core structure of the bacterial flagellar type III export gate complex. PLoS Biol 15:e2002281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bocharov EV, Mayzel ML, Volynsky PE, Mineev KS, Tkach EN, Ermolyuk YS, Schulga AA, Efremov RG, Arseniev AS. 2010. Left-handed dimer of EphA2 transmembrane domain: helix packing diversity among receptor tyrosine kinases. Biophys J 98:881–889. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gaidukov L, Nager AR, Xu S, Penman M, Krieger M. 2011. Glycine dimerization motif in the N-terminal transmembrane domain of the high density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI required for normal receptor oligomerization and lipid transport. J Biol Chem 286:18452–18464. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.229872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ou SI, Schrock AB, Bocharov EV, Klempner SJ, Haddad CK, Steinecker G, Johnson M, Gitlitz BJ, Chung J, Campregher PV, Ross JS, Stephens PJ, Miller VA, Suh JH, Ali SM, Velcheti V. 2017. HER2 transmembrane domain (TMD) mutations (V659/G660) that stabilize homo- and heterodimerization are rare oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma that respond to afatinib. J Thorac Oncol 12:446–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Partridge AW, Therien AG, Deber CM. 2004. Missense mutations in transmembrane domains of proteins: phenotypic propensity of polar residues for human disease. Proteins 54:648–656. doi: 10.1002/prot.10611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhou FX, Cocco MJ, Russ WP, Brunger AT, Engelman DM. 2000. Interhelical hydrogen bonding drives strong interactions in membrane proteins. Nat Struct Biol 7:154–160. doi: 10.1038/72430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Farrell IS, Toroney R, Hazen JL, Mehl RA, Chin JW. 2005. Photo-cross-linking interacting proteins with a genetically encoded benzophenone. Nat Methods 2:377–384. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0505-377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ross JA, Plano GV. 2011. A C-terminal region of Yersinia pestis YscD binds the outer membrane secretin YscC. J Bacteriol 193:2276–2289. doi: 10.1128/JB.01137-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tseytin I, Dagan A, Oren S, Sal-Man N. 2018. The role of EscD in supporting EscC polymerization in the type III secretion system of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860:384–395. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Iguchi A, Thomson NR, Ogura Y, Saunders D, Ooka T, Henderson IR, Harris D, Asadulghani M, Kurokawa K, Dean P, Kenny B, Quail MA, Thurston S, Dougan G, Hayashi T, Parkhill J, Frankel G. 2009. Complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O127:H6 strain E2348/69. J Bacteriol 191:347–354. doi: 10.1128/JB.01238-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Brosig B, Langosch D. 1998. The dimerization motif of the glycophorin A transmembrane segment in membranes: importance of glycine residues. Protein Sci 7:1052–1056. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Planson AG, Guijarro JI, Goldberg ME, Chaffotte AF. 2003. Assistance of maltose binding protein to the in vivo folding of the disulfide-rich C-terminal fragment from Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 expressed in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 42:13202–13211. doi: 10.1021/bi035321c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Salema V, Fernández LÁ. 2013. High yield purification of nanobodies from the periplasm of E. coli as fusions with the maltose binding protein. Protein Expr Purif 91:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kolmar H, Hennecke F, Gotze K, Janzer B, Vogt B, Mayer F, Fritz HJ. 1995. Membrane insertion of the bacterial signal transduction protein ToxR and requirements of transcription activation studied by modular replacement of different protein substructures. EMBO J 14:3895–3904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ottemann KM, DiRita VJ, Mekalanos JJ. 1992. ToxR proteins with substitutions in residues conserved with OmpR fail to activate transcription from the cholera toxin promoter. J Bacteriol 174:6807–6814. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.21.6807-6814.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bronnimann MP, Chapman JA, Park CK, Campos SK. 2013. A transmembrane domain and GxxxG motifs within L2 are essential for papillomavirus infection. J Virol 87:464–473. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01539-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gurezka R, Laage R, Brosig B, Langosch D. 1999. A heptad motif of leucine residues found in membrane proteins can drive self-assembly of artificial transmembrane segments. J Biol Chem 274:9265–9270. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sal-Man N, Shai Y. 2005. Arginine mutations within a transmembrane domain of Tar, an Escherichia coli aspartate receptor, can drive homodimer dissociation and heterodimer association in vivo. Biochem J 385:29–36. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Duplay P, Szmelcman S. 1987. Silent and functional changes in the periplasmic maltose-binding protein of Escherichia coli K12. II. Chemotaxis towards maltose. J Mol Biol 194:675–678. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90244-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Durfee T, Nelson R, Baldwin S, Plunkett G III, Burland V, Mau B, Petrosino JF, Qin X, Muzny DM, Ayele M, Gibbs RA, Csörgo B, Pósfai G, Weinstock GM, Blattner FR. 2008. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: insights into the biology of a laboratory workhorse. J Bacteriol 190:2597–2606. doi: 10.1128/JB.01695-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Miller VL, Mekalanos JJ. 1988. A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR. J Bacteriol 170:2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2575-2583.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rose RE. 1988. The nucleotide sequence of pACYC184. Nucleic Acids Res 16:355. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.1.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Schlosser-Silverman E, Elgrably-Weiss M, Rosenshine I, Kohen R, Altuvia S. 2000. Characterization of Escherichia coli DNA lesions generated within J774 macrophages. J Bacteriol 182:5225–5230. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.18.5225-5230.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Edwards RA, Keller LH, Schifferli DM. 1998. Improved allelic exchange vectors and their use to analyze 987P fimbria gene expression. Gene 207:149–157. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00619-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1 

All export apparatus genes are critical for T3SS activity. Protein secretion profiles of wild-type (WT), ΔescR, ΔescS, ΔescT, ΔescU, and ΔescV EPEC strains grown under T3SS-inducing conditions. The secreted proteins were concentrated from supernatants of bacterial cultures and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. The T3SS-secreted translocators EspA, EspB, and EspD are indicated on the right of the gel. Also indicated is the location of EspC, which is not secreted by the T3SS. T3SS activity was observed for the WT EPEC strain but not in any of the mutant strains. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.1 MB (2.2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2 

Oligomer formation of EscR point mutations. Membrane protein extracts of WT EPEC and ΔescR strain complemented with EscRWT-3HA, EscR-TM3ex-3HA, EscRY164A-3HA, EscRD171A-3HA, or EscRS175A-3HA were incubated in BN sample buffer and then subjected to BN-PAGE (3 to 8% gradient gel; upper panel) and SDS-PAGE (lower panel) and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. (Upper panel) BN-PAGE analysis showed that EscRWT-3HA and EscRY164A-3HA form a high-molecular-weight protein complex that is absent from the EscR-TM3ex-3HA and the EscRD171A-3HA samples. EPEC ΔescR transformed with pEscRS175A-3HA showed an intermediate phenotype. (Lower panel) To confirm similar EscR expression levels among the samples, membrane protein extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-HA antibody. Similar protein expression levels were observed. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.5 MB (499.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3 

Sequence alignment of export apparatus proteins. A standard protein BLAST alignment is presented by ClustalW (8) for FliP of E. coli flagella (P0AC05), FliP of Salmonella flagella (P54700), SpaP of Salmonella SPI-1 T3SS (P40700), SsaR of Salmonella SPI-2 T3SS (A0A0M0Q7P7), Spa24 of Shigella T3SS (P0A1L3), YscR of Yersinia T3SS (P69980), and EscR of EPEC T3SS (B7UMC1). High levels of conservation were observed among the proteins, including a 100% conservation of the aspartic acid residue at position 171 of EscR of EPEC T3SS. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.6 MB (583.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TEXT S1 

Detailed description of the construction of single null mutants and all plasmids used in this study and the membrane protein extraction method. Download TEXT S1, DOCX file, 0.04 MB (39.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2018 Tseytin et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES