Skip to main content
Medical Principles and Practice logoLink to Medical Principles and Practice
. 2018 Mar 12;27(3):201–210. doi: 10.1159/000488320

Cadaver Dissection Is Obsolete in Medical Training! A Misinterpreted Notion

Ismail Memon 1,*
PMCID: PMC6062726  PMID: 29529601

Abstract

Cadaver dissection (CD) is considered a tool for studying the structural details of the human body. Lately, conflicting opinions regarding the utility of this modality in medical training have been published in medical literature. This review of the literature examines the status of anatomy teaching with CD in traditional, modern, and postgraduate medical training across the world. Literature published in the En­glish language on topics related to CD in the past 3 decades was scrutinized using different search engines. About 200 full texts were reviewed. We describe how medical schools have continued to include CD in anatomy teaching in the traditional or modified form. Medical schools that stopped or decreased CD have learnt from their experiences, and have restarted it in modified forms by integrating it vertically with medical training. In addition, CD activities have increased in postgraduate anatomy courses, surgery training, and voluntary/optional CD programs. CD, when integrated vertically, still has a part to play in medical training in modified ways. This overview may help curriculum designers to place CD in medical curricula and training programs in a justified manner.

Keywords: Anatomy teaching, Medical curriculum, Cadaver dissection, Surgery training

Significance of the Study

  • Since the inception of the modern medical curriculum, anatomy teaching and cadaver dissection (CD) have been diluted or reallocated in medical training. Anatomists, surgeons, and medical educationists have published different opinions on the status of CD. This review presents the status of CD in traditional and modern curricula, undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, surgical training, and elective courses. It also provides information on the relevance of CD to medical training. This can help stakeholders to include anatomy and CD in a justified manner in medical training.

Introduction

Cadaver dissection (CD) started in 300 BC [1] and by the 15th century, it was considered a tool for studying the structural details of the human body. The first documented CD by a medical student was performed in the 16th century and by the 18th century, it had become an essential component of medical education [2]. CD remained an integral part of the undergraduate medical curriculum until 2–3 decades ago and was mostly carried out in the initial years of medical training [2]. A revolution then started in the medical curriculum, aimed at decreasing expenses, removing redundancies, and making it more clinical [3]. In modernized versions of the curriculum, anatomy became the most compromised of the basic medical science subjects. This was particularly true for CD, which was reduced substantially, limited to prosections, or removed completely [4]. Conflicting opinions in favor of/against CD have been reported in the literature [5, 6]. The aim of this review is to determine the status of CD at different stages of medical training from the undergraduate to the postgraduate level. Placement, reallocation, and the importance of CD at curricular and voluntary/optional levels are also discussed. Briefly, in current medical curricula, traditional CD has been reduced but is still practiced in modified forms which we explain in this article.

Literature Search

This is a narrative overview. Published literature in English on relevant topics was searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, Ancestry, Ingentaconnect, ResearchGate, and FreeFullPDF. The following key words, either individually or in combination, were used for the search: “human cadaver dissection,” “traditional and modern anatomy curriculum,” “anatomy teaching,” “anatomy practical lab,” “cadaver dissection in surgery training and post-graduation courses,” “elective and special courses of cadaver dissection,” and “training workshops on cadaver dissection.” Studies concerning anatomy teaching with CD in the medical curriculum and as a voluntary/optional activity, published in 1990–2017, were included. After screening the abstracts, about 200 articles were found to be relevant to our review and their full texts were read. Studies on the same topics published in other languages were excluded. The main ideas from the selected papers were extracted and are discussed here. I also share my personal and anecdotal experiences from colleagues. The status of CD in the medical curriculum and as voluntary/optional (VOCD) activities is illustrated as an organogram in Figure 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Organogram illustrating the status of cadaver dissection in the curriculum and as voluntary/optional activities.

Current State of CD in Medical Training

CD in the Traditional Undergraduate Curriculum

In the traditional undergraduate medical curriculum, teaching anatomy with CD remains important to many students [7], and so CD has therefore continued as a significant part of anatomy teaching over the last 4 centuries. Recently, in the past 2–3 decades, several medical schools have reduced or stopped dissection in undergraduate teaching [8]. Despite this, published literature from different continents has shown that CD is still practiced in the undergraduate curriculum, albeit in modified and integrated forms.

Today, Africa and the USA are the leading geographic areas in which medical schools offer CD. In Africa, 90% of medical schools [9, 10, 11, 12], and also in North and South America, a large majority [5, 13, 14, 15] offer CD in their undergraduate curricula. A survey involving 65 medical schools in the USA indicated the inclusion of dissection in most anatomy teaching programs [16, 17]. In Canada, several medical schools have retained mandatory dissection in their undergraduate medical curriculum; the University of Saskatchewan offers optional dissection to interested students [18].

In Asia, data regarding CD are not available from most of the medical schools. However, the literature shows that, in India [19, 20], Sri Lanka [21], Bangladesh [22], China [23], Korea [24], and Thailand [25], many medical schools continue teaching anatomy assisted by CD. I have worked at an Anatomy Faculty in Pakistan for > 15 years in the public and private sectors. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the majority of medical schools, particularly in the public sector, have continued with the traditional curriculum and use prosections and plastic models in anatomy laboratory teaching, but that only some of them offer CD [26, 27]. Some medical schools in Saudi Arabia [28, 29], Iran [30, 31], and Japan [32] also use CD in anatomy teaching.

In European countries, traditional CD is not overwhelmingly used. Nonetheless, well-known medical schools in the UK [14, 33], Ireland [34], France [35], and Germany [36] offer CD in anatomy teaching. The University of East Anglia, UK [3], and many medical schools in Australia offer optional dissection [37]. The details of some of the institutions continuing with CD in their traditional curriculum are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Examples of institutions that include cadaver dissection in the traditional undergraduate medical curriculum

Institution Country Reference
University of Nairobi Kenya [12]
Methodist University Kenya [12]
Ambrose Alli University Nigeria [10]
University of Gondar Ethiopia [11, 14]
Mount Sinai School of Medicine USA [13]
St. George's Medical School Grenada [14]
National University of Cordoba Argentina [5]
University of Toronto Canada [18]
McGill University Canada [18]
University of British Columbia Canada [18]
University of Saskatchewan1 Canada [18]
Santosh Medical College India [19, 20]
University of Sri Jayewardenepura Sri Lanka [21]
Dhaka Medical College (and others) Bangladesh [22]
Nanjing Medical University China [23]

Seoul National University College of Medicine Korea [24]
Naresuan University Thailand [25]
Islamabad Medical and Dental College, Abbottabad Northern Institute of Medical Sciences, and others Pakistan [26, 27]
Jundi Shapour University of Medical Sciences Iran [31, 32]
College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia [29]
Fukushima Medical University Japan [32]
Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' School of Biomedical Science UK [33]
University of Leicester1 UK [15]
University of East Anglia1 UK [3]
Brighton and Sussex Medical School UK [15]
School of Medicine and Medical Science1 Ireland [35]
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Germany [36]
Graz Medical School Austria [38]
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa [38]
1

Optional cadaver dissection.

A recent report by subject experts from Austria, Brazil, Colombia, India, New Zealand, Nigeria, Spain, South Africa, the USA, and Uruguay, confirms the presence of CD in different forms and formats in undergraduate curricula in their institutions [38]. Thus, collective data indicate that CD in the undergraduate curriculum has continued in many institutions across the world.

CD in the Modern Undergraduate Curriculum

Several institutions around the world have introduced modern integrated curricula by introducing problem-based learning (PBL), case-based learning (CBL), team-based learning (TBL), and other computer-assisted teaching methods along with CD in undergraduate anatomy teaching [6, 28, 39, 40]. The medical curriculum is not static. It takes many years for changes to be incorporated into the curriculum, and even more to decide if their outcomes are beneficial. For instance, some medical schools either reduced or abolished CD, but feedback from faculty and students, and concerns raised by surgeons, resulted in its reintegration into the clinical context and modern teaching methods [40, 41, 42]. Recent studies also recommend integrating CD into the modern curriculum [43], but some medical schools offer CD to students only when they are in their clinical rotation/internship [44]. In addition, CD is found to be beneficial in integrated teaching approaches for histopathology training [45]. Details of institutions conducting anatomy teaching with CD in the modern curriculum are given in Table 2.

Table 2.

Examples of institutions that include cadaver dissection (CD) in the modern undergraduate medical curriculum, in bachelors, diploma, masters courses, and in surgical training programs

CD activity Institution Country Reference
Modern undergraduate curriculum University of Melbourne Australia [7]
Universities of Otago and Auckland New Zeeland [38]
Alfaisal University Saudi Arabia [28]
New York University USA [41]
University of California (San Francisco and Davis)1 USA [41]
University of Hawaii1 USA [42]
University of Washington1 USA [42]

Bachelors, diploma, and masters Cardiff University (BSc) UK [50]
University of Dundee UK [48]
University of Otago New Zealand [47]
The Wayne State University USA (MSc) USA [49]
University of Nairobi Kenya [49]

Surgical training Wolfson Surgical Skills Centre UK [73]
The Royal College of Surgeons UK [56]
The Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals UK [55]
Otago School of Medical Sciences New Zealand [66]
Universities of Sydney and Melbourne Australia [58]
Clinical Training and Evaluation Centre Australia [59]
The University of Western Australia Australia [59]
1

Restarted dissection.

CD in Diploma and Masters Programs

Medical graduates can further continue their careers on either a teaching or a clinical track. In teaching careers, graduates can pursue diploma, masters, MPhil, or PhD programs, while on the clinical side, they can pursue residency training in surgery or medicine. It is noteworthy that where there has been a lack of CD in undergraduate medical education, it has been compensated for in postgraduate training. Such training methods are practiced in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, the USA, and Africa, where medical schools strengthen the anatomical skills of their students in postgraduate programs using CD [46, 47, 48, 49, 50]. Anecdotally, in Pakistan, CD is offered in programs such as MPhil in Anatomy. Details of the above are presented in Table 2.

CD in Surgical Training

Highlighting the need for CD, Oliver Beahrs, a surgeon of international repute and the first President of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists, asserted: “... today's residents in surgery are learning their anatomy on sick patients for the first time in the middle of the night: operating without a firm knowledge of anatomy leads to increased mortality and morbidity” [51]. During the succeeding years, Ellis [52], Pawlina and Lachman [53], Regenbogen et al. [54], Holland et al. [55], and many other surgeons, anatomists, and medical educationalists also raised this issue and emphasized the significance of CD in medical and surgical training. In order to overcome these deficiencies, many institutions in the UK [55, 56], New Zealand [57], Australia [58, 59], and the USA [60, 61] have recommended and/or included additional dissection programs of specific body parts in their surgical residency programs. Details of the institutions offering CD in surgery training are given in Table 2.

Voluntary/Optional CD

VOCD refers to CD activities which are not necessary for passing examinations or qualifying with a degree, and if someone practices CD in extracurricular sessions, it is not credited in his/her course work. To fulfill the need for CD amongst interested students, many institutions offer extra CD courses. These training sessions provide opportunities for hands-on practice to dissect the specific regions/parts of the body and learn emergency procedures. VOCD training activities, such as CD in elective courses, in the learning of emergency and autopsy procedures, and in continuous professional development sessions, are optional and not actually a part of the curriculum.

CD in Elective Courses

Accepting the significance of dissection, Warwick University in the UK created an anatomy exchange program with St. George's University, Grenada, which was a voluntary activity [14]. In 2011, the Sydney Medical School, Australia, reintroduced a 7-week elective whole-body CD course [46]. Medical schools in Australia, New Zealand, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia have also started CD as a voluntary activity [62, 63, 64]. Ohio State University in the USA has implemented elective programs with interactive CD for medical students in different surgical specialties [65]. Charles University in Prague, Czech Re­public, uses cadavers for teaching practical endoscopic methods to undergraduate and postgraduate students [66]. I would like to note that Aga Khan University in Pakistan offered intermittent elective CD courses during the summer vacations in 2003–2011. Details are given in Table 3.

Table 3.

Examples of institutions that include cadaver dissection (CD) in elective courses, emergency and autopsy training, and continuous professional development programs

CD activity Institution Country Reference
Elective courses Warwick University UK [14]
St. George's University, Grenada Grenada [14]
Charles University in Prague Czech Republic [66]
Sydney Medical School Australia [46]
Medical Schools New Zealand [62]
Kuwait University Kuwait [63]
Al Faisal University Saudi Arabia [64]
The Ohio State University USA [65]
Aga Khan University Pakistan this study1

Emergency and autopsy training University of California USA [64]
Continuous professional development European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam The Netherlands [72]
“Theatrum anatomicum” Germany [77]
Wolfson Surgical Skill Centre UK [73]
Centre of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna Austria [75]
Duke Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, and Docent LLC, Atlanta USA [90]
Surgery Department of Aga Khan University Pakistan this study1
1

As yet unpublished observations by the author.

CD in the Learning of Emergency and Autopsy Procedures

Emergency clinical procedures such as lumbar puncture, cricothyrotomy, paracentesis, gastric lavage, and venesection require a detailed knowledge of human anatomy; CD and demonstrations provide an ideal opportunity to learn such skills [67]. In this context, the University of California, USA, in addition to its online training, uses hands-on practice with unembalmed cadavers for teaching emergency procedures [68]. Autopsy is a pathological dissection procedure of medicolegal importance. In order to learn and keep updated about anatomy and dissection skills over time, it is essential for medical students and practicing physicians to acquire autopsy skills [69]. During autopsies, trainees avail the opportunity of dissecting mostly fresh and unembalmed bodies [70]. In Japan, dissection of the human body is allowed only under special circumstances, such as medicolegal autopsies or for teaching in medical colleges. The anatomy departments of most universities in Japan provide the facilities for comedical training schools to observe CD as they acknowledge the importance of dissection [71]. Details are depicted in Table 3.

CD in Continuous Professional Development Sessions

Following the need and importance of CD in the subspecialties of surgery, radiology, and clinical practice, various institutions have started specialty-specific training courses on cadavers. These courses are in addition to their routine curricular residency training and conducted under the supervision of experts, providing a valuable opportunity for learning particular procedures and techniques. In this regard, many institutions arrange voluntary courses on CD for teaching modified surgical skills [72, 73, 74, 75, 76]. I note here that the neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and otolaryngology sections of the Surgery Department of Aga Khan University and many other insti­tutions in Pakistan conduct specialty-specific training courses on cadavers. In Germany, a new “Theatrum anatomicum,” similar to the ancient anatomical theatre provides an opportunity for learning anatomy and difficult surgical procedures outside the operating room by making use of cadavers [77]. In addition, many medical training centers conduct CD workshops in order to develop new surgical procedures [78, 79]. The institutions conducting specialty-specific training courses on cadavers are shown in Table 3.

Discussion

This article presents the status of anatomy teaching with CD as parts of both the medical curriculum and VOCD. Curricular activity is categorized under both undergraduate and postgraduate curricula. Undergraduate anatomy teaching with CD is discussed as a part of traditional and modern curricula. In postgraduate programs, CD is discussed in the diploma, masters, and surgery training programs. Outside the curriculum, CD is presented in elective courses, the learning of emergency and autopsy procedures, and continuous professional development.

The literature indicates that many schools around the word have retained CD as part of anatomy teaching in their traditional undergraduate medical curricula. Some medical schools have integrated it vertically and/or with other basic science subjects. Some other medical schools offer optional dissection to interested students. Although the modern undergraduate medical curriculum started with cutting down on detailed anatomy teaching and CD, the literature cited here shows that CD has either been continued or restarted with the PBL, CBL, and TBL methods of teaching. For modern teaching methods, CD has been integrated within the clinical context and aided by radiological images. Around the world, CD is also practiced in postgraduate programs (surgery training, diploma, bachelors, and masters in anatomy, etc.).

Deficiencies in physical examination skills and surgical procedures as well as the lack of anatomical knowledge for interpreting radiological images tempted experts to start dissection programs outside the curriculum. The published literature also shows that CD has been practiced in VOCD programs, such as elective dissection courses, learning emergency and autopsy procedures, and continuous professional development sessions.

Anatomy teaching with CD used to be a major component of the first 2 years of the undergraduate curriculum. As it is a time-consuming activity, other basic science subjects were compromised. This situation compelled the stakeholders to voice their concerns and demand a balanced allocation of time for the basic science subjects in the medical curriculum. However, the outcomes were different. Instead of a balanced reallocation of basic science subjects, several, but not all, medical schools reduced the time allocated for anatomy teaching. Simultaneously, they omitted or significantly condensed CD [80]. Within the span of approximately 2 decades, gaps in anatomical knowledge amongst graduating students became evident. General medical practitioners graduating from this era were found to be lacking in skills for performing simple medical procedures, which jeopardized the safety of patients [81]. This undesirable impact gave rise to new strategies which brought CD back, in conjunction with innovative teaching methods, and reallocated it in medical training [70].

As highlighted in the subsections “CD in the Traditional Curriculum” and “CD in the Modern Integrated Curriculum,” a significant number of medical schools in the USA, Africa, and others around the world have continued with CD in their traditional, modern integrated, and hybrid undergraduate curricula. I agree with Inuwa et al. [82] that traditional and modern curricula can be taught together, instead of discarding the traditional methods of anatomy teaching. Additionally, many other techniques like radiographs, cadaver computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound [44, 83, 84], computer media, CD ROM [20], and computer-aided holographic models [85] have been added to CD in anatomy teaching. These modifications, with some exceptions [86], have enhanced 3-dimensional perception and the understanding of the human body, thus moving closer to safe medical practice. I also agree with Yammine [61], Alyafi et al. [39], and Turney [87] that traditional methods, such as dissection and prosections, can meet many of the objectives of the PBL approach, like developing reasoning skills and learning, in a relevant context.

On the academic side, the shortage of anatomy teachers experienced in CD skills has increased [80, 88]. Thus, the teaching of anatomy by unskilled teachers has created a vicious cycle of producing more anatomy teachers and clinicians who are, however, less equipped with dissection and procedural skills [8, 16, 42, 87, 89]. To compensate for these deficiencies, diploma, bachelors, and masters courses in anatomy and/or basic sciences with CD have been recommended and introduced [59, 90]. Such programs have certainly helped in producing better anatomy teachers who can train medical students to be competent enough to cope with the needs of general medical practice and surgery training [91, 92]. This scenario emphasizes the importance of continuing anatomy teaching with CD in medical training. However, CD has partly shifted from the undergraduate to the postgraduate level.

On the clinical side, abandoning CD had a negative effect on the competency of future surgeons, ultimately compromising the safety of patients. This impelled surgeons and anatomists to raise their concerns and vouch for CD in medical training. They could not convince medical educationalists to resume CD the way it is practiced in the traditional curriculum, but they were able to incorporate it in surgical training programs. Furthermore, reallocation of CD at advanced levels, in conjunction with various modalities of radiology, imaging, cadaver CT slices, and modern electronic and digital techniques, enhanced the spectrum of CD in diagnosis and treatment [44, 57, 93, 94]. The reorganization of CD from undergraduate teaching to surgical training programs has reinforced its validity in medical education.

In many countries of the world, it is within the scope of general medical practitioners employed in the public sector to conduct general medical procedures and perform autopsies. A sound knowledge of gross anatomy and dissection skills is essential for carrying out medical emergency procedures and autopsies. The importance and necessity of CD has thus continued to grow. Different institutions have added dissection at different levels in their undergraduate and postgraduate curricula, but the need for CD is undisputed. Therefore, in addition to reallocation of CD in the medical curricula, VOCD is also introduced into elective courses, the learning of emergency and autopsy procedures, and specialty-specific workshops (Table 3).

Many medical graduates continue their professional careers as general practitioners, some specialize in surgery- or medicine-allied fields, and the rest adopt teaching as a career. It is a common anecdotal argument that graduates who do not become surgeons or anatomy teachers do not need extensive dissection skills. However, in today's medical world, the subspecialties in intervention medicine, such as cardiology, gastroenterology, nephrology, and pulmonology, require a good knowledge of the human body for safe procedural practice. At the very least, a sound knowledge of anatomy would behove practitioners to understand patients' symptoms and relate them to the organs involved. This entire situation indicates that CD has actually not been abolished but rather integrated vertically in the undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula, and is strengthened by the clinical scenario, radiology, and digital and other modern tools.

Limitations

This review does not include any numerical data or statistical analysis, which could have strengthened its value and importance. Secondly, the inclusion of additional literature in other languages would have broadened the spectrum of the article.

Conclusion

Medical practitioners, surgeons, anatomy teachers, and researchers in the anatomical field cannot avoid CD if they wish to become competent professionals. They need CD skills to assist them in performing safe and satisfactory practices during their professional careers. Thus, it is not reasonable to conclude that CD is obsolete in medical training. I support the contention of Ghosh [95] that anatomy including CD should be incorporated vertically, in a reasonable manner, into medical education at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels as well as in internships, along with other modern teaching strategies.

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr. Dileep Rohra, Assoc. Prof., Alfaisal University, and Mr. Irfan Anjum, Assist. Prof., King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for their scholarly review and refinement of this article.

References

  • 1.von Staden H. The discovery of the body: human dissection and its cultural contexts in ancient Greece. Yale J Biol Med. 1992;65:223–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rath G, Garg K. Inception of cadaver dissection and its relevance in the present day scenario of medical education. J Indian Med Assoc. 2006;104:331–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Howe A, Campion P, Searle J, et al. New perspectives - approaches to medical education at four new UK medical schools. BMJ. 2004;329:327–331. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7461.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rainsbury D, Barbour A, Mahadevan V. College launches national anatomy project. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:19. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Biasutto SN, Caussa LI, Criado del., Rio LE Teaching anatomy: cadavers versus computers? Ann Anat. 2006;188:187–190. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patel SB, Mauro D, Fenn J, Sharkey DR, et al. Is dissection the only way to learn anatomy? Thoughts from students at a non-dissecting-based medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:259–260. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0206-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:173–180. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Korf HW, Wicht H, Snipes RL, et al. The dissection course - necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat. 2008;190:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gangata H, Ntaba P, Akol P, et al. The reliance on unclaimed cadavers for anatomical teaching by medical schools in Africa. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:174–183. doi: 10.1002/ase.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Izunya AM, Oaikhena GA, Nwaopara AO. Attitudes to cadaver dissection in a Nigerian medical school. Asian J Med Sci. 2010;2:89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bekele A, Reissig D, Loffler S, et al. Experiences with dissection courses in human anatomy: a comparison between Germany and Ethiopia. Ann Anat. 2011;193:163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ongeti K. Pedagogical value of dissection anatomy in Kenya. Singapore Med J. 2012;53:712–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reidenberg JS, Laitman JT. The new face of gross anatomy. Anat Rec. 2002;269:81–88. doi: 10.1002/ar.10076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chambers J, Emlyn-Jones D. Keeping dissection alive for medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:302–303. doi: 10.1002/ase.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:45–52. doi: 10.1002/ase.1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, et al. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:253–259. doi: 10.1002/ase.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Der Bedrosian J. Johns Hopkins University: Johns Hopkins Magazine; 2016. First-year medical students still rely on cadavers to learn anatomy. https://hub.jhu.edu/magazine/2016/winter/cadavers-anatomy-medical-school/ (accessed 2 January 2018) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grant K. Dissection debate: why are medical schools cutting back on cadavers? http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/dissection-debate-why-are-medical-schools-cutting-back-on-cadavers/article18296300/ (accessed 15 December 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharma N. Teaching of human anatomy in India: the Indian perspective. Missing the woods for the trees? Rev Arg Anat Clin. 2014;6:6–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Arora L, Sharma BR. Assessment of role of dissection in anatomy teaching from the perspective of undergraduate students: a qualitative study. Ibnosina J Med BS. 2011;3:59–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weerasuriya T, Chan F, Yasawardene S, et al. Preference of medical students of formaldehyde-preserved cadaveric dissection versus pre-dissected specimens as a teaching tool in human anatomy. J Med Res. 2014;2014:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nurunnabi AM, Ara S, Khalil M, et al. Ethics in dissection of cadaver in teaching and learning of anatomy. Bangladesh J Bioethics. 2011;2:10–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang L, Xiao M, Gu M, et al. An overview of the roles and responsibilities of Chinese medical colleges in body donation programs. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:312–320. doi: 10.1002/ase.1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kang SH, Shin JS, Hwang YI. The use of specially designed tasks to enhance student interest in the cadaver dissection laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:76–82. doi: 10.1002/ase.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Winkelmann A, Güldner FH. Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand. BMJ. 2004;329:1455–1457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Naz S, Nazir G, Iram S, et al. Perceptions of cadaveric dissection in anatomy teaching. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011;23:145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khan HM, Mirza TM. Physical and psychological effects of cadaveric dissection on undergraduate medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:831–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cowan M, Arain NN, Assale TS, et al. Student-centered integrated anatomy resource sessions at Alfaisal University. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:272–275. doi: 10.1002/ase.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vohra MS. Personal formaldehyde exposure level in the gross anatomy dissecting room at the College of Medicine King Saud University Riyadh. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011;24:108–113. doi: 10.2478/s13382-011-0004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Javadnia F, Hashemitabar M, Kalantarmahdavi SR, et al. How to decrease the emotional impact of cadaver dissection in medical students. Pak J Med Sci. 2006;22:200–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hassanzadeh G, Narges Hassanpoor N, Jalali A, et al. Teaching anatomy: viewpoints of Iranian anatomists. Thrita J Med Sci. 2012;1:62–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murakami T, Tajika Y, Ueno H, et al. An integrated teaching method of gross anatomy and computed tomography radiology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:438–449. doi: 10.1002/ase.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ali A, Khan ZN, Konczalik W, et al. The perception of anatomy teaching among UK medical students. RCS bulletin. 2015;97:397–400. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cahill KC, Ettarh RR. Attitudes to anatomy dissection in an Irish medical school. Clin Anat. 2009;22:386–391. doi: 10.1002/ca.20777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ropars M, Haegelen C, Najihi N, et al. Analytic study of hopes and perceptions of second-year medical school students during gross anatomy laboratory sessions. Morphologie. 2011;95:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bernhardt V, Rothkötter HJ, Kasten E. Psychological stress in first year medical students in response to the dissection of a human corpse. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29 doi: 10.3205/zma000782. doc12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eppler E, Serowy S, Link K, et al. Experience from an optional dissection course in a clinically orientated concept to complement system-based anatomy in a reformed curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 doi: 10.1002/ase.1707. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Biasutto SN, Sharma N, Weiglein AH, et al. Human bodies to teach anatomy: importance and procurement - experience with cadaver donation. Rev Arg Anat Clin. 2014;6:72–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alyafi MM, Alamodi AA, Juurlink BH, et al. How the dissection laboratory facilitates integration of learning: presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm with a large intracardiac thrombus: a rare cadaver finding. Int J Angiol. 2012;21:77–80. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:95–103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Patel KM, Moxham BJ. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clin Anat. 2006;19:132–141. doi: 10.1002/ca.20249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when …? Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289:215–218. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pais D, Casal D, Mascarenhas-Lemos L, et al. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: a 3-year prospective study. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:127–136. doi: 10.1002/ase.1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nwachukwu CR. Cadaver CT scans a useful adjunct in gross anatomy: the medical student perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:83–84. doi: 10.1002/ase.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gopalan V, Dissabandara L, Nirthanan S, et al. Integrating gross pathology into teaching of undergraduate medical science students using human cadavers. Pathol Int. 2016;66:511–517. doi: 10.1111/pin.12448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Burgess AW, Ramsey-Stewart G, May J, et al. Team-based learning methods in teaching topographical anatomy by dissection. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82:457–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stringer MD, Lyall P. Design, implementation, and evaluation of a postgraduate diploma in surgical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:48–54. doi: 10.1002/ase.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Eisma R, Lamb C, Soames RW. From formalin to Thiel embalming: what changes? One anatomy department's experiences. Clin Anat. 2013;26:564–571. doi: 10.1002/ca.22222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ogeng'o J, Ongeti K, Misiani M, et al. Maintaining excellence in teaching of human anatomy: University of Nairobi experience. Anat J Afr. 2013;2:117–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kwan A. Biomedical Sciences (Anatomy) with a preliminary year and professional training year (BSc) http://courses.cardiff.ac.uk/undergraduate/detail/bcd7.html (accessed 16 December 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Green NA. Anatomy training for surgeons - a personal viewpoint. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:69–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ellis H. Medico-legal litigation and its links with surgical anatomy. Surgery. 2002;20:i–ii. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pawlina W, Lachman N. Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: rebuttal to McLachlan. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004;281:9–11. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Studdert DM, et al. Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246:705–711. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815865f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Holland JP, Waugh L, Horgan A, et al. Cadaveric hands-on training for surgical specialties: Is this back to the future for surgical skills development? J Surg Educ. 2011;68:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rainsbury RM. Supporting modern postgraduate surgical training programs in the United Kingdom. Eur J Anat. 2007;11:105–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cornwall J, Stringer MD. Are computed tomography scans of cadavers perceived as a useful educational adjunct in a surgical anatomy course? Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:77. doi: 10.1002/ase.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stewart F, West R. Gross topographical anatomy by dissection for basic surgical training candidates: development and implementation of a course at University of Sydney. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:A98. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jansen S, Kirk D, Tuppin K, et al. Fresh frozen cadavers in surgical teaching: a gelatine arterial infusion technique. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:880–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05596.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lewis CE, Peacock WJ, Tillou A, et al. A novel cadaver-based educational program in general surgery training. Surg Educ. 2012;69:693–698. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yammine K. The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there? Teach Learn Med. 2014;26:184–188. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.883985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, et al. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80:212–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Khan KM. Anatomy education at the Faculty of Medicine of Kuwait University. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19:418. doi: 10.1159/000316386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yaqinuddin A, Ikram MF, Zafar M, et al. The integrated clinical anatomy program at Alfaisal University: an innovative model of teaching clinically applied functional anatomy in a hybrid curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40:56–63. doi: 10.1152/advan.00153.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Haubert LM, Jones K, Moffatt-Bruce SD. Surgical clinical correlates in anatomy: design and implementation of a first-year medical school program. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:265–272. doi: 10.1002/ase.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Doubková A, Smrzová T. Practical endoscopic methods education in the Educational Center for Anatomy and Endoscopy of the Department of Anatomy, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague - is there room for further progress? Cas Lek Cesk. 2008;147:487–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Boon JM, Meiring JH, Richards PA. Clinical anatomy as the basis for clinical examination: development and evaluation of an introduction to clinical examination in a problem-oriented medical curriculum. Clin Anat. 2002;15:45–50. doi: 10.1002/ca.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tabas JA, Rosenson J, Price DD, et al. A comprehensive, unembalmed cadaver-based course in advanced emergency procedures for medical students. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:782–785. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Goyal PK, Gupta M, Kaur J. Autopsy as a tool for learning gross anatomy during 1st year MBBS. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6:230–232. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:83–93. doi: 10.1002/ase.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sakai T. Body donation: an act of love supporting anatomy education. JMAJ. 2008;51:39–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.The 21st International Course in Modern Rhinoplasty Techniques Impressions. 2014 http://www.rhinoplastycourse.nl/cadaver-dissection. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Royal College of Surgeons, England Annual report 2007–2008. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/...ffile/RCS (accessed 17 December 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mitchell EL, Sevdalis N, Arora S, et al. A fresh cadaver laboratory to conceptualize troublesome anatomic relationships in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1187–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Traxler H, Fock N. Vienna hands-on-courses defining post graduate anatomical-surgical training since 1997. www.anatomical-surgical-training.com (accessed 17 December 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zenn MR. Thirteenth annual fresh cadaver flap dissection course. http://plastic.surgery.duke.edu/flapcourse (accessed 16 December 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Boeckers A, Fassnacht U, Boeckers TM. “Theatrum anatomicum” - a revived teaching facility in gross anatomy. Ann Anat. 2008;190:495–501. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Clemente FR, Fabrizio PA, Shumaker M. A novel approach to the dissection of the human knee. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:41–46. doi: 10.1002/ase.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Becker AM, Hwang PH. Endoscopic endonasal anatomy of the nasopharynx in a cadaver model. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3:319–324. doi: 10.1002/alr.21104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40:243–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Warner JH, Rizzolo LJ. Anatomical instruction and training for professionalism from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Clin Anat. 2006;19:403–414. doi: 10.1002/ca.20290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Inuwa I, Taranikanti V, Al-Rawahy M, et al. “Between a rock and a hard place”: the discordant views among medical teachers about anatomy content in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012;12:19–24. doi: 10.12816/0003083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bohl M, Francois W, Gest T. Self-guided clinical cases for medical students based on post-mortem CT scans of cadavers. Clin Anat. 2011;24:655–663. doi: 10.1002/ca.21143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Phillips AW, Smith SG, Straus CM. The role of radiology in preclinical anatomy: a critical review of the past, present, and future. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miller M. Use of computer-aided holographic models improves performance in a cadaver dissection-based course in gross anatomy. Clin Anat. 2016;29:917–924. doi: 10.1002/ca.22766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC. Imaging the cadavers being dissected does not appear to improve the gross anatomy dissection experience. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:78–79. doi: 10.1002/ase.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:104–107. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Habbal O. The state of human anatomy teaching in the medical schools of gulf cooperation council countries: present and future perspectives. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009;9:24–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.McLachlan JC. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging versus dissection. Anat Rec. 2004;281:4–5. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Standring S. New focus on anatomy for surgical trainees. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:114–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lachman N, Pawlina W. Integrating professionalism in early medical education: the theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat. 2006;19:456–460. doi: 10.1002/ca.20344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fraher JP, Evans DJ. Training tomorrow's anatomists today: a partnership approach. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:119–125. doi: 10.1002/ase.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Collins JP. Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy. BMJ. 2008;337:a131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jiménez AM, Aguilar JF. Laparoscopy: learning a new surgical anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:81–83. doi: 10.1002/ase.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:286–299. doi: 10.1002/ase.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Principles and Practice are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES