Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0197643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197643

Thiol-maleimide poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinking of L-asparaginase subunits at recombinant cysteine residues introduced by mutagenesis

Josell Ramirez-Paz 1, Manoj Saxena 1, Louis J Delinois 1, Freisa M Joaquín-Ovalle 1, Shiru Lin 1, Zhongfang Chen 1, Virginia A Rojas-Nieves 1, Kai Griebenow 1,*
Editor: Marco Rito-Palomares2
PMCID: PMC6063399  PMID: 30052638

Abstract

L-Asparaginase is an enzyme successfully being used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. However, some disadvantages still limit its full application potential, e.g., allergic reactions, pancreatitis, and blood clotting impairment. Therefore, much effort has been directed at improving its performance. A popular strategy is to randomly conjugate L-asparaginase with mono-methoxy polyethylene glycol, which became a commercial FDA approved formulation widely used in recent years. To improve this formulation by PEGylation, herein we performed cysteine-directed conjugation of the L-asparaginase subunits to prevent dissociation-induced loss of activity. The recombinant cysteine conjugation sites were introduced by mutagenesis at surface-exposed positions on the protein to avoid affecting the catalytic activity. Three conjugates were obtained using different linear PEGs of 1000, 2000, and 5000 g/mol, with physical properties ranging from a semi-solid gel to a fully soluble state. The soluble-conjugate exhibited higher catalytic activity than the non-conjugated mutant, and the same activity than the native enzyme. The cysteine-directed crosslinking of the L-asparaginase subunits produced a higher molecular weight conjugate compared to the native tetrameric enzyme. This strategy might improve L-asparaginase efficiency for leukemia treatment by reducing glomerular filtration due to the increase in hydrodynamic size thus extending half-live, while at the same time retaining full catalytic activity.

Introduction

L-Asparaginase is a homo-tetramer enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of asparagine to aspartic acid and ammonia [1]. Some types of blood cancers, e.g., acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, need to acquire L-Asn from extracellular sources due to a deficiency in the expression of asparagine synthetase. L-asparaginase has been used as the main therapeutic agent for more than 40 years to treat leukemia and lymphoma [2]. Once injected into the bloodstream L-asparaginase maintains the pool of circulating asparagine under a concentration that affects protein biosynthesis in the malignant cells, without affecting the normal cells, to eventually promote apoptosis [26]. In addition to its medicinal application, L-asparaginase has been recently studied as a possible solution to reduce the content of acrylamide in cooked food products. Acrylamide was cataloged as “probably carcinogenic to humans” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, besides being a toxin. Treating raw products with L-asparaginase before cooking reduces the main acrylamide precursor asparagine, which reduces acrylamide content in cooked products [7].

The main limitation during medical treatments with L-asparaginase is its inactivation due to degradation by proteolytic enzymes and anti-asparaginase antibodies developed by the host, which cause rapid serum clearance of the drug [26,8,9]. A common strategy to improve the pharmacokinetics of protein-based drugs is their modification with polyethylene glycol. PEGylation extents the half-life of proteins by increasing their molecular weight to retard glomerular filtration, while simultaneously hiding antigenic and proteolytic epitopes through its known stealth effect [1012]. A commercial formulation of E. coli L-asparaginase II modified with mono-methoxy polyethylene glycol exhibited about five-fold prolonged blood half-life compared to the non-modified enzyme in clinical studies, and a significant reduction in the incidence of neutralizing antibodies was also observed [36,13]. Such improvements reduce the frequency of injections and dosage during treatment [5,6].

PEGylation is an efficient method to improve protein pharmacokinetics but is usually accompanied by adverse effects on the pharmacodynamics [1012], e.g., an increasing degree of PEGylation is correlated to the reduction of catalytic activity and substrate affinity due to restriction of protein structural dynamics and steric effects [14,15]. In the case of L-asparaginase, the catalytic activity was drastically reduced to 8% compared to the natural enzyme when around half of the lysine residues were PEGylated [1622]. Furthermore, a clinical study indirectly revealed that the in vivo substrate affinity was affected, since higher concentration of PEGylated L-asparaginase as compared to the non-modified enzyme was needed to maintain the serum concentration of L-Asn under ~10 μM [13], which is relevant since the in vivo substrate affinity of this enzyme is 29 μM and the normal steady-state asparagine concentration in serum is around 60 μM [4,23]. Another disadvantage is the discovery of anti-PEG antibodies due to the high exposure to this polymer that we experience in daily life [2426].

While it is indisputably necessary to investigate other types of polymers and methods to improve the pharmacodynamics of protein-based drugs, over two decades of clinical use has stablished PEGylation as the most efficient method to extent biopharmaceutics half-life, besides being an affordable technology still evolving [27]. As for the future of L-asparaginase, new formulations are constantly entering clinical trials [2,3], and there is convincing evidence of its efficiency for more than 40 years [28,29]. For example, a recombinant form from E. coli recently entered the European market [2]. An attractive way to modify L-asparaginase pharmacokinetics while at the same time maintaining its pharmacodynamics is by recombinant cysteine-directed PEGylation, that is the attachment of PEG polymers at pre-selected positions on the protein surface introduced by mutagenesis [3033]. By attaching PEGs at pre-selected positions, one can avoid obstructing the active site and limit the degree of PEGylation to maintain protein structural dynamics thus to retain full catalytic activity [14,15]. This strategy has been partially validated for L-asparaginase through PEGylation at its natural disulfide bond without losing catalytic activity, independently of the PEGs length [34,35].

In this work we report for the first time the simultaneous cysteine-directed PEGylation and intramolecular crosslinking of L-asparaginase subunits at pre-selected canonical cysteines introduced by mutagenesis. The advantage of this approach is that not only the degree of modification is kept to a minimum in order to retain catalytic activity, but careful selection of the PEGylation positions also offers the possibility to target potential proteolytic and immunogenic epitopes. Moreover, the molecular weight was increased at least four-fold compared to the native L-asparaginase with as low as one PEG molecule per protein subunit and this significantly reduces the chance for glomerular filtration and anti-PEG binding. PEGylation of this therapeutically important enzyme at canonical amino acids is not reported, even though the conjugation chemistry at cysteine residues is well known and highly specific [36]. The most convenient way to express recombinant L-asparaginase is by secretion into the periplasmic space or culture medium [3740], since cytoplasmic expression leads to formation of inclusion bodies making the purification tedious [41]. However, expression of canonical cysteines affects L-asparaginase secretory expression [42]. Herein we were able to express a double-Cys mutation of L-asparaginase as a secreted product, to later perform the cysteine-directed crosslinking of the subunits. Our findings will benefit the evolving technological improvement of L-asparaginase as therapeutic agent by setting the proof-of-concept of this alternative PEGylation strategy.

Materials and methods

Materials

The plasmid pET-22b(+) was purchased from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). The vector pET22b-AspII was synthetized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Gibson’s assembling kit was purchased from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). Primers were synthesized, and DNA sequencing was performed by MCLAB (San Francisco, CA, USA). The E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells, yeast extract, tryptone, glycerol, tris-base, hydrochloric acid, ampicillin, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside, sucrose, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, magnesium sulfate, vacuum filters, ammonium sulfate, sodium chloride, spin ultrafiltration filters, potassium phosphate monobasic and dibasic, tris-2-carboxyethyl-phosphine hydrochloric, 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid, dithiothreitol, ethanol absolute, acetic acid glacial, Nessler’s reagent, trichloroacetic acid, L-asparagine, natural and randomly-PEGylated L-asparaginase, and Corning clear-bottom 96-well plates, were purchased from Millipore Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The MonoQ, Superdex 200 10/300 GL, and Sephadex G-25 columns were from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The MS standards Cal Mix 3 and Glu-Fib-B1 were purchased from SCIEX (Redwood City, CA, USA). The Bi-MAL-PEG linkers were purchased from Creative PEGWorks (Chapel Hill, NC, USA). The 4–20% gradient polyacrylamide gels were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 dye, and Pierce BCA protein assay kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Grand Island, NY, USA). Gel densitometry analysis was performed with Gel Analyzer II by Dr. Istvan Lazar (Copyright 2010).

Cloning

The ansB gene encoding the mature E. coli L-asparaginase II along with its natural signaling peptide [43] was synthetized and cloned into the plasmid pET-22b(+) at the Nde-I and BamH-I restriction sites to generate the expression vector pET22b-AspII. The L-asparaginase mutants C77S-C105S and A38C-T263C were generated using Gibson’s assembling method [44]. Commercial DNA sequencing was used to verify the constructs.

Secretory expression

E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells were transformed with pET22b-AspII and grown in terrific broth medium (24 g/l yeast extract, 12 g/l tryptone, 4 ml/l glycerol, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.2, 100 μg/ml of ampicillin), which is suitable for asparaginase extracellular secretion [37]. Cultures were grown to an OD600nm ~0.200 and tested for induction with 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μM of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and harvested 4 h post-induction. Secretion of asparaginase catalytic activity was also followed at 8, 16, and 24 h post-induction.

Secretion into the periplasmic space and culture medium was assayed by measuring the presence of asparaginase activity in the extracytoplasmic compartments. The culture medium fraction was defined as the total activity found in the clear culture medium supernatant after centrifugation. The periplasmic space fraction was obtained by osmotic shock as follows. The cell pellet was suspended in osmotic solution 1 (20%w/v sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5) with 25 ml of solution per gram of pellet, then incubated at 25°C and 150 rpm for 10 min, and centrifuged at 4°C and 10000xg for 10 min. Immediately thereafter, the pellet was resuspended in osmotic solution 2 (10 mM MgSO4 in cold water) with 25 ml of solution per gram of pellet, then incubated at 4°C and 150 rpm for 10 min, and centrifuged at 4°C and 10000xg for 10 min. The periplasmic fraction was defined as the total activity found in the supernatants after centrifugation. The specific asparaginase productivity (U/g) was calculated as the ratio of catalytic activity (U) per biomass weight (g). Measurements were performed in triplicate. Cultures transformed with the pET-22b(+) plasmid were used as negative control.

Purification

Purification was carried out by anion exchange chromatography [45,46], using a MonoQ 8-ml column attached to an AKTApurifier-UPC900 FPLC (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, USA). L-Asparaginase was extracted from the periplasmic space as detailed in the previous method section. The crude solution after osmotic shock was centrifuged and filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size filter and then adjusted to pH 8.5 with Tri-HCl buffer. The MonoQ column was equilibrated with Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.5), the crude L-asparaginase mixture was loaded into the column and washed with the same equilibration buffer. Elution was performed with a ramp of 0–100% 1 M NaCl in 50 ml. The presence of L-asparaginase was screened by measuring the catalytic activity.

Asparaginase catalytic activity

Asparaginase catalytic activity was assayed by measuring the release of ammonia determined by direct nesslerization [47]. The enzymatic reaction was started by dispensing the substrate solution (10 mM L-Asn, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6) to the L-asparaginase samples up to 150 μl. All samples were assayed simultaneously in a 96-well-plate using an Infinite M200PRO plate-reader with automatic dispensers (Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland). The samples and substrate solution were pre-heated at 37°C. The reaction was stopped after 10 min by dispensing 50 μl of TCA (0.3 M). The presence of ammonia was measured by the increase in absorption at 425 nm after the addition of 50 μl Nessler’s reagent. Ammonia concentration was determined with a calibration curve made with ammonium sulfate. Measurements were performed in triplicate. One enzymatic unit was defined as 1 μmol of ammonia produced at 37°C in 10 minutes.

Total protein quantification

Total protein concentration was determined with Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit used as per manufacturer’s instructions and confirmed with the L-asparaginase absorption coefficient at 278 nm (E1% = 7.1) [48]. For samples that weren’t pure enough, SDS-PAGE gel densitometry analysis was used to correct the concentration values using the >99% pure bands as standard. Densitometric analysis was performed with the Gel Analyzer II software (Copyright license 2010) with rolling ball background subtraction.

Gel electrophoresis

Native-PAGE and SDS-PAGE was performed using 4–20% polyacrylamide gels with the corresponding manufacturer’s running and loading buffers (Bio-Rad, USA) and run at 150 V for 1 h. Samples of 5 μl were mixed at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio with the loading buffer and incubated for 5 min at 90°C in the case of denaturing SDS-PAGE. For Native-PAGE the samples were mixed with the native loading buffer and no further treatment was done. Gels were stained with 0.02% Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and washed with de-staining solution (25 ml ethanol, 40 ml acetic acid, up to 500 ml with distilled water).

Mass spectroscopy

The molecular weights of the native L-asparaginase and the A38C-T263C mutant was obtained by mass spectroscopy. A MALDI 4800 plus TOF/TOF (SCIEX, USA) was used in positive linear mode, with sinapinic acid (10 mg/ml) in acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoro acetic acid 50:50 (v/v) as matrix. Calibration was performed with Cal Mix 3 (5735–66431 ±50 Da) and a commercial natural L-asparaginase II (E. coli) was set as standard (34600 ±50 Da).

Identity of the native L-asparaginase was confirmed using MS/MS analysis [49]. Briefly, the excised L-asparaginase band from SDS-PAGE was digested overnight at 4°C with 50 μl of trypsin (13 ng/μl) and the peptides purified using a reverse phase C-18 zip-tip column. Eluted peptides were plated on the MALDI target plate mixed 1:1 (v/v) with α-cyano-4-hydrooxycinnamic acid (5 mg/ml) in acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoro acetic acid 50:50 (v/v) as matrix, and then analyzed in positive reflector MS/MS mode. Calibration was performed with Glu-Fib-B1 (1571.61 ± 0.5 Da). The precursor peptide pattern was compared against the E. coli taxonomy from the Mascot database online server.

Cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking

Cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking was carried out by reacting the terminal maleimide groups of the PEG polymers with the recombinant surface-exposed cysteines introduced by mutagenesis on L-asparaginase using the well-known thiol-Michael addition click chemistry [36]. Briefly, L-asparaginase mutant (A38C-T263C) in the crosslinking buffer (0.1 M potassium phosphate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.150 M NaCl, pH 6.5–7.0) was reduced with 5 mM tris-2-carboxyethyl-phosphine hydrochloric (TCEP) for 30 min at room temperature. Immediately thereafter, the reduced solution was desalted by gel filtration or by repeated washing/concentration steps in a 10 kDa cut-off ultrafiltration filter with the crosslinking buffer. Then, the concentration of readily-exposed Cys was calculated using 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (Ellman’s reagent) [50]. To perform this assay the sample must be concentrated due to the low content of Cys in L-asparaginase. Consequently in the case where the solution was desalted by gel filtration it was subsequently concentrated by one step of ultrafiltration prior to the test. Next, the concentrated reduced solution was diluted with the crosslinking buffer to adjust the concentration of readily-exposed Cys to 0.1 mM and reacted with the corresponding Bi-MAL-PEG polymer (1000, 2000 or 5000 g/mol) at a 40:1 molar ratio of PEG-to-Cys for 3 h at 25°C. Although a smaller molar ratio of PEG-to-Cys should promote a greater likelihood of intramolecular over intermolecular crosslinking [51], preliminary experiments showed a low recovery of bio-PEG-conjugates. We therefore decided to work with a high excess of PEG during the reaction. The reaction was stopped by addition of 10 mM DTT for 15 min, and the bio-PEG-conjugates were recovered by gel filtration chromatography or by repeated ultrafiltration steps using a 100 kDa cut-off filter. Since L-asparaginase subunits have a mass of ~35 kDa, non-conjugated subunits should pass through this membrane while tetrameric (or higher) bio-PEG-conjugates are retained. When the ultrafiltration method was used, the final desalting step of the crosslinked solution was done with Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.5).

Size exclusion chromatography

Size exclusion chromatography was used for purification of the 1kDa and 2kDa-PEG-conjugates after the crosslinking reaction by the ultrafiltration method previously described, and for qualitative characterization of the crosslinking reaction with the 5000 g/mol Bi-MAL-PEG. For the first case, the bio-PEG-conjugate (1kDa or 2kDa) was reduced with 10 mM TCEP for 30 min at room temperature and concentrated by ultrafiltration to 100 μl. Next it was loaded onto a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column pre-equilibrated with Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.5) and eluted with the same buffer at 0.75 ml/min. Fractions of 1 ml were collected and the presence of L-asparaginase was screened by measuring the catalytic activity.

For the second case, the mutant L-asparaginase solution was reduced with TCEP as described in the previous section, concentrated to 100 μl by ultrafiltration, loaded and eluted from the Superdex 200 10/300 GL column pre-equilibrated with the crosslinking buffer at 0.75 ml/min. The collected 1 ml-fractions were immediately assayed for catalytic activity, combined, concentrated by ultrafiltration to calculate the concentration of readily-exposed Cys residues, and thereafter diluted to perform the crosslinking reaction with the 5000 g/mol Bi-MAL-PEG as described before. After the reaction was stopped by addition of DTT, the crosslinked solution was concentrated to 100 μl by ultrafiltration, loaded and eluted from the size exclusion column pre-equilibrated with the crosslinking buffer at 0.75 ml/min. This experiment was performed with the intention of observing the change in molecular weight resulting from the cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking in a qualitative manner, and to obtain an approximate value for the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate mass.

Computational analysis

Geometry optimizations and electronic property computations of the model structure from L-asparaginase monomer were performed at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory using the Gaussian 09 program [5254]. The model structure comprises the amino acids forming the natural disulfide bond and the serine mutations (C77-105S), along with four adjacent residues (D76, D78, K104 and D106). The starting atomic coordinates were extracted from the crystal structure reported by Swain et al. (1993) [1]. Partial optimizations, in which the last carbon atoms in adjacent residues are fixed, were carried out to explore the effect of substituting the S atoms of cysteine in the natural disulfide bond by OH groups thus generating the serine residues. The solvent effect of water was considered by using the polarizable continuum model (PCM)/X throughout the computations [55].

Results and discussion

Characterization of cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking

Cysteine-directed PEGylation was performed using thiol-maleimide chemistry [36], to target cysteine residues previously introduced by mutagenesis at positions A38 and T263. These positions were selected in order to minimize the distance between Cys-to-Cys on adjacent subunits and maximize it within the same subunit. We argue that this promotes a higher ratio of intramolecular (within the L-asparaginase tetramer) as opposed to intermolecular (tetramer-to-tetramer) crosslinking. Selection of the mutation sites was done using the reported crystal structure coordinates from Swain et al. (1993). The distance between cysteine residues on adjacent subunits is 18–34 Å, while within the same subunit it is 55 Å. The selected cysteine mutations are far (~29 Å) from the active sites (Fig 1A) [1]. The tetrameric-structure of L-asparaginase has four active sites and each site is formed by the association of five residues from one subunit with two of the adjacent subunit (Fig 1B) [1,56]. It is difficult to select PEGylation positions further away from the active sites since L-asparaginase is a compact molecule. Nevertheless, the active site residues are relatively buried in comparison with the mutated cysteines (for PEGylation). The computed solvent accessible area of the catalytic center was 17.2 vs. 89.3 Å2 of the mutated positions (A38C-T263C), which reduces the likelihood of the active sites being affected after PEGylation.

Fig 1. Selection of L-asparaginase PEGylation sites.

Fig 1

(A) L-Asparaginase tetramer with subunits highlighted with different colors, one active site is represented in red spheres, the pre-selected PEGylation positions in blue spheres, and the distances between mutated residues (A38C and T263C) are shown by black dotted lines. (B) L-Asparaginase dimer showing two active sites relatively buried (red spheres) in comparison with the PEGylations sites (blue spheres).

Cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking was performed with homogeneous Bi-MAL-PEG polymers of 1000, 2000 and 5000 g/mol, which resulted in three physically different conjugates. Increasing the polymer size caused the bio-PEG-conjugate rigidity to decrease until it became completely soluble. The 1kDa-PEG-conjugate was a semi-solid gel (Fig 2A), while the 2kDa-PEG-conjugate was physically a soft gel in which a fraction of L-asparaginase (catalytic activity) remained in solution. The 5kDa-PEG-conjugate was a fully soluble construct. We think these results can be explained by the degree of dynamic freedom of the PEG molecule and kinetics of the thiol-maleimide reaction. The mutated cysteines on the L-asparaginase surface are the nucleophiles responsible for attacking the electrophilic carbon of the maleimide ring [36]. The first step of the crosslinking reaction proceeds fast in the presence of a Bi-MAL-PEG molar excess and at low protein concentrations [51]. Once a cysteine reacts with one reactive side of the homo-bifunctional linker, the rate of the second reaction step depends on how fast the Bi-MAL-PEG finds the second Cys partner. For the smallest PEG polymer (1000 g/mol) to react with the intramolecular partner is less probable than to react with an intermolecular thiol partner therefore the rate of intermolecular crosslinking is superior. The result is a hydrogel of intermolecularly crosslinked L-asparaginase. The hydrophilicity of PEGs also influences the rate of this second step [57], since interaction with water delays the finding of a second intramolecular partner. At increasing Bi-MAL-PEG length the bio-PEG-conjugates become more soluble because of the promotion of intramolecular over intermolecular crosslinking due to an increased dynamic freedom of PEG. Subunit crosslinking of L-asparaginase (Lys-directed) has been reported by Balcão et al. (2001), although no direct evidence of this crosslinking was shown [58]. Handschumacher and Gaumond (1972) also reported on L-asparaginase crosslinking that resulted mainly in dimers [59]. Our cysteine-directed PEGylation strategy (introducing recombinant Cys residues) yielded a highly homogeneous and covalently crosslinked 2kDa-PEG-conjugate, which ran equal to the native L-asparaginase tetramer on a Native-PAGE (Fig 2B) and did not dissociate during denaturing SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (Fig 2C) proving that the subunits were indeed covalently crosslinked.

Fig 2. Cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking with 1 and 2 kDa PEG.

Fig 2

(A) 1kDa-PEG-conjugate gel. (B) Native and (C) SDS-PAGE of native L-asparaginase (left lanes) and the 2kDa-PEG-conjugate (right lanes). Note that a substantial amount of the 2kDa-PEG-conjugate did not enter the gel because it was too large. The bio-PEG-conjugates were generated by the ultrafiltration crosslinking method and afterward purified with one gel filtration step. The photo of the 1kDa-PEG-conjugate gel was taken on a blue light dock, the hydrogel had a clear appearance.

The cysteine-directed PEGylation with the 5000 g/mol PEG was characterized by size exclusion chromatography to qualitatively follow the covalent crosslinking of the subunits. The mutant L-asparaginase (A38C-T263C) was reduced with TCEP prior to and after PEGylation and then analyzed using gel filtration chromatography. Due to the quite low purity of the starting mutant solution (S1 File), eluted fractions were also evaluated for catalytic activity to corroborate the presence of L-asparaginase. Prior to PEGylation, it was observed that the mutant (A38C-T263C) eluted at several fractions in which more than 50% of the catalytic activity was found from 8–13 ml. The activity was observed at several fractions because the mutant L-asparaginase eluted in form of different multisubunit forms that will associate into the active tetramer upon addition of the substrate during the activity assay [1,56]. After PEGylation, most of the activity was found in one fraction which eluted at 8–9 ml (Fig 3), while the additional UV peaks (280 nm) were remaining contaminants from the starting mutant solution (S1 File). The elution peak of the 5kDa-PEG-conjugated is in the range of 600–900 kDa, calculated from the column manufacturer calibration curve with the same elution conditions. This range corresponds to around double of that reported for randomly PEGylated L-asparaginase [16,18]. One must keep in mind that this result is not entirely accurate due to the high hydrophilicity of PEG that reduces protein mobility on gel filtration columns [57], and because this bio-PEG-conjugate is actually a narrow population of molecular weights. Despite of this, the assumed molecular weight is significantly higher than the 138.4 kDa of the native L-asparaginase tetramer. This implies that the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate likely also involves intra- and intermolecular crosslinking. In any case, this bio-PEG-conjugate clearly exceeds the threshold of glomerular filtration which is beneficial for its application in leukemia [10,60], similar to the existing commercial randomly-PEGylated L-asparaginase [36,13]. The contrast between the catalytic activity eluted from gel filtration prior (wide distribution along 5 ml) and after (almost at a single 1 ml) PEGylation suggests that the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate must be covalently crosslinked as it was not affected by reduction with TCEP contrary to the precursor mutant.

Fig 3. Cysteine-directed PEGylation followed by size exclusion chromatography.

Fig 3

(A) Mutant L-asparaginase (A38C-T263C) reduced with TCEP and eluted from the gel filtration column. Fractions 8–13 ml were pooled and used for the PEGylation crosslinking reaction. (B) 5kDa-PEG-Conjugate after crosslinking reaction, reduced with TCEP and eluted from the gel filtration column. The continuous curve represents the relative absorbance at 280 nm and the bars are the relative asparaginase catalytic activity of the fractions.

The product recovery after the cysteine-directed crosslinking reaction by gel filtration was modest. The fraction where most of the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate eluted represents less than 20% of the initial catalytic activity exhibited by the starting enzyme solution. For that reason, we also tested ultrafiltration for product purification using 10 and 100 kDa cut-off filters. The washing of the starting mutant enzyme solution after reduction with TCEP was done using a 10 kDa cut-off filter, immediately followed by the crosslinking reaction. The 5kDa-PEG-conjugate was pooled by performing repeated washing/concentration steps with a 100 kDa cut-off filter, since the non-conjugated L-asparaginase should flow-through these pores. The recovery by this method was about 48% of the initial catalytic activity (S2 File). From a yield point of view, the ultrafiltration method is simpler and more efficient than the gel filtration approach, since size exclusion chromatography is not a 100% effective separation method and is usually accompanied by a significant loss of sample.

Our results are in stark contrast with those reported for the established random Lys-directed PEGylation of the enzyme where multiple molecular weight conjugates of L-asparaginase were obtained thus complicating subsequent separation processes required for the commercialization of this drug. Such disadvantage of random PEGylation is exemplified in the report by Soares et al. (2002), where a wide distribution of molecular weight conjugates could be observed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis [18]. In addition to the present article, the work by Balan et al. (2007) also highlights the advantage of Cys-directed PEGylation, although in this case the conjugation was performed at the natural disulfide bond [34].

Effect of cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking on catalytic activity

The antileukemia mechanism of L-asparaginase is still not fully understood, but there is a strong agreement that this enzyme acts by nutritional deprivation. Depletion of L-asparagine is perceived as the main trigger to destabilize the malignant cells, which are by themselves incapable of efficiently synthesizing this amino acid endogenously and therefore depend on the circulating L-Asn in blood. After administration of L-asparaginase, the enzyme reduces the asparagine concentration in blood which impairs protein biosynthesis in the leukemia blasts and subsequently induces apoptosis in the cells that could not develop resistance [26]. Therefore, retention of the L-asparaginase catalytic activity after any modification is the most important in vitro parameter to extrapolate its potential antileukemia effect in vivo. PEGylation is the most utilized conjugation method to enhance pharmacokinetics of protein-based drugs [10], and among many examples, a commercial PEGylated L-asparaginase from E. coli is being used as frontline treatment [2,5]. However, PEGylation is also known for promoting restriction of protein structural dynamics thus diminishing the catalytic activity at an increasing degree of modification [14,15].

Because of its therapeutic importance L-asparaginase has been modified using several types of materials and approaches, e.g., bound to inorganic matrices, conjugated with natural and synthetic polymers, encapsulated into nanoparticles, and some hybrid-type approaches. A wide variety of results have been reported related to the pharmacodynamics parameters of those modifications, but in terms of PEGylation there is a clear conclusion that L-asparaginase catalytic activity is affected when conjugated using a Lys-directed approach depending on the degree of modification [61]. Wang et al. (2012) demonstrated that Lys-directed PEGylation can be improved through an alkylation strategy. The PEGylated L-asparaginase was highly homogeneous but still the catalytic activity was reduced to 44% compared to the non-modified enzyme [19]. Alkylation allows to control the degree of modification tightly, but PEGylation sites could not be selected which might explain the drastic reduction in catalytic activity even with a low degree of modification. Balan et al. (2007) successfully modified L-asparaginase at its natural cysteine residues using a three-carbon bridge chemistry. In that study, the bio-PEG-conjugate retained full catalytic activity independently of the PEG molecular weight [34]. Unfortunately, this strategy is limited by the low solvent accessible area of the natural disulfide bond which affects the use of thiol-maleimide chemistry to crosslink the L-asparaginase subunits. In addition, the PEGylation sites cannot be selected which limits the potential to hide proteolytic and antigenic epitopes. Another important aspect is that L-asparaginase is a tetrameric enzyme and the association of the monomeric subunits is imperative to form the active sites and exhibit catalytic activity [1,56]. It has been shown that PEGylation reduces the ability of this enzyme to form its tetrameric-structure [18], which could reduce the efficiency of this drug since the average administration is around 7 μg of L-asparaginase per milliliter of blood [5,62]. A covalent crosslinking strategy of L-asparaginase subunits has been proposed to stabilize the active multimeric structure, but previous results showed that this approach is linked to a cost in catalytic activity due to the Lys-directed conjugation employed. Balcão et al. (2001) accomplished to retain 35% activity [58], while Handschumacher and Gaumond (1972) only managed to keep 17% activity compared to the non-modified L-asparaginase [59].

In this work we performed cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking of L-asparaginase subunits that yielded a fully soluble bio-PEG-conjugate after reacting with 5000 g/mol Bi-MAL-PEG. The average catalytic activity of the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate and its non-conjugated mutant precursor (A38C-T263C) was assayed in vitro by measuring the rate of L-Asn hydrolysis. L-asparaginase concentration was selected to be 14 μg/ml to simulate a therapeutically relevant concentration. The precursor mutant exhibited lower catalytic activity than the native non-modified L-asparaginase (P<0.05), 116 ± 6 vs. 161 ± 9 U/mg, respectively (Table 1). This was unexpected since the mutated cysteines are relatively far away from the active site (Fig 1), which suggests that the high solvent accessible area of the mutated residues (89.3 Å2) might promote disulfide subunit multimerization that eventually affects formation of the L-asparaginase tetrameric-structure required to perform catalysis [18,34,63,64]. After the cysteine-directed crosslinking, the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate showed superior catalytic activity than the native L-asparaginase (P<0.05), 210 ± 11 vs. 161 ± 9 U/mg, respectively (Table 1). It was expected that this mutant should retain the same catalytic activity after PEGylation [34], but not that it would exceed the activity of native L-asparaginase. Since no mutations were performed near the active site, these results support the hypothesis that the tetrameric-structure formation of L-asparaginase is a determinant step for its catalysis [18,34,63,64]. We presume that the covalent crosslinking maintains the subunits within high proximity between each other, hereby facilitating the formation of the active tetrameric-structure triggered by the presence of the L-Asn substrate [63,64], a process that usually is rate limiting. To support these observations, we compared the catalytic activity of the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate and native non-modified enzyme at below biological temperature to introduce an energetic effect that should delay the association of the tetrameric-structure thus reducing the average catalytic activity as well [17,40,64]. At 24°C the native L-asparaginase exhibited a catalysis of 47.2 ± 1.7 U/mg, 30% of the one observed at 37°C. The activity obtained for the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate was 210 ± 6 U/mg, basically the same as observed at 37°C. This strongly suggest that the covalent intrasubunit crosslinking is playing a stabilazing effect that accelerates the formation of the active structure upon addition of the L-Asn substrate [63]. It is important to explain that due to the low purity of the starting mutant solution (A38C-T263C), the 5kDa-PEG-conjugate solution is not pure as well (S1 File). This means that the L-asparaginase concentration value used is overestimated, which causes the value of the calculated specific activity to be underestimated (S3 and S4 Files).

Table 1. Catalytic activity of cysteine-directed crosslinked L-asparaginase.

Sample Specific activity (U/mg) Relative activity (%)a
Native 161 ± 9 100
A38C-T263C 116 ± 6 72 ± 6
5kDa-PEG-conjugate 210 ± 11 130 ± 11
Randomly-PEGylatedb 125 ± 10 77 ± 8

aSpecific activity of native L-asparaginase was defined as 100%.

bCommercial randomly-PEGylated L-asparaginase formulation (Millipore Sigma, USA) was used for comparison.

Reported values are the average with the standard deviation calculated by error propagation.

In summary, our cysteine-directed PEGylation strategy to crosslink L-asparaginase subunits generated higher molecular weight bio-PEG-conjugates and improved the average catalytic activity likely involving an intrasubunit proximity-stabilization mechanism. Compared to previous reported PEGylation strategies, our PEGylation method is the only one that improved the catalytic potential of L-asparaginase (Table 2). A similar method has not been proposed before possibly due to the difficulty to express and purify recombinant L-asparaginase containing non-natural cysteines [42]. We are the first to report this kind of mutation in L-asparaginase designed for cysteine-directed conjugation, which is beneficial to improve this therapeutic enzyme since a commercial recombinant L-asparaginase is already on the market [2].

Table 2. Comparison of PEGylation methods for L-asparaginase.

Modification specificitya Modification degree (%)b Activity (%)c Reference
PEG Dichloro-s-triazine (5000 Da) 20–79 45–11 Ashihara et al. [16]
1900 Da 76 20 Ashihara et al. [16]
750 Da 84 16 Ashihara et al. [16]
PEG Vinylpyrrolidone-maleic acid (5000 Da) 33 59 Qian et al. [17]
PEG Succinimidyl succinate (5000 Da) 54 30 Soares et al. [18]
PEG Propionaldehyde (20000 Da) 4 44 Wang et al. [19]
PEG Chloro-s-triazine (10000 Da) 57 11 Matsushima et al. [20]
PEG Chloro-s-triazine (10000 Da) 57 8 Kamisaki et al. [21]
PEG Comb-shaped (100000 Da) 34 86 Kodera et al. [22]
13000 Da 50 46 Kodera et al. [22]
PEG Monosulfone (5000, 10000 & 20000 Da) 4 100 Balan et al. [34]
Dextran-glutaraldehyde 99 35 Balcão et al. [58]
Dimethylsuberimidate 25 17 Handschumacher & Gaumond [59]
PEG Bi-maleimide (5000 Da) 9 130 This work

aModification specificity refers to the functional group in the polymer that is conjugated to L-asparaginase.

bModification degree refers to the average percentage of conjugated sites in comparison to the total amine groups per L-asparaginase tetramer.

cActivity refers to the relative catalytic activity of the bio-PEG-conjugate compared to the non-conjugated L-asparaginase defined as 100% and as reported by each study.

Studies on PEGylation of L-asparaginase show a trend of decreasing catalytic activity with increasing degree of modification (Fig 4), which can be explained by the restriction of protein structural dynamics related to the number of polymers conjugated to the protein, but independently of the PEG molecular weight [14,15]. Our results do deviate from this trend because due to the simultaneous crosslinking, an activity increase is accomplished with respect to the activity of the non-decorated mutant enzyme. Furthermore, because we use a recombinant-Cys-directed methodology, we are capable of varying the conjugation position to target potential proteolytic and immunogenic epitopes. Simultaneously, the covalent subunit crosslinking also increases the molecular weight to enhance delay of glomerular filtration [10,60].

Fig 4. Dependence of L-asparaginase catalytic activity on the degree of PEGylation.

Fig 4

Relative catalytic activity is expressed as percentage compared to the non-conjugated L-asparaginase defined as 100% and reported by each study. Modification degree refers to the average percentage of conjugated sites relative to the available amine groups per L-asparaginase tetramer. The results to generate this figure were extracted from references [1622,34] and this work.

L-Asparaginase is also being studied as a possible solution to reduce the formation of acrylamide in fried food products [7]. Even though it is not the main scope of this report, the physical properties of our 1kDa-PEG-conjugate could be beneficial for industrial applications that use L-asparaginase. After treating raw products with L-asparaginase to hydrolyze the acrylamide precursor asparagine, the enzyme is difficult to recover due to its soluble state. Our bio-PEG-conjugate is a semi-solid gel that can be recovered from solution and reutilized. We tested the catalytic activity of this bio-PEG-conjugate within a temperature range from 20°C to 80°C to evaluate its potential for being used in industrial applications. The same 1kDa-PEG-conjugate sample was used throughout the whole experiment by washing the gel with distilled water after each catalytic cycle. Our bio-PEG-conjugate proved to be highly reusable along the 27 cycles tested, with a maximum catalytic temperature up to 60°C (Fig 5). Although L-asparaginase is a multimeric protein with the catalytic core in the middle of two subunits [1,56], our discreet conjugation didn’t affect its enzymatic function even in an insoluble state. This conjugation strategy could be extended to other industrially important enzymes to improve cost-efficiency.

Fig 5. Reusability of the 1kDa-PEG-conjugate.

Fig 5

Relative catalytic activity at temperatures ranging from 20°C to 80°C. The 1kDa-PEG-conjugate (in green), native L-asparaginase (in blue), and a commercial randomly-PEGylated L-asparaginase formulation (Millipore Sigma, USA) (in black). Relative catalytic activity was calculated by the absorption at 425 nm divided by the maximum signal for each sample and expressed as percentile (%). Reported values are average with error bars representing the 95% confidence interval. For the 1kDa-PEG-conjugate the same sample (semi-solid gel) was used throughout all the experiment.

Secretory expression

In this work, a recombinant L-asparaginase was expressed using the commercial pET system (Novagen, Germany). Induction of the pET22b-AspII expression system with IPTG concentrations of 500 and 1000 μM was counterproductive, since it significantly decreased the secretion of native L-asparaginase in comparison with induction using 10 and 100 μM (P <0.01) (S5 File). These results agree with other studies using the same pET system. Khushoo et al. (2004) found that a concentration of 100 μM of IPTG was favorable for secretion and cell growth [37], while Vidya et al. (2011) reported the highest level of secretion inducing with 10 μM of IPTG [39]. Extracellular secretion of L-asparaginase to the growth medium was monitored at 8, 16 and 24 h post-induction. Most of the catalytic activity was found in the culture medium at 8 h post-induction, afterwards the ratio of activity-to-biomass decreased (S5 File). It is unnecessary to grow cultures beyond 8 h, which is a practical information when producing high amount of this enzyme recombinantly. Due to the convenience of producing L-asparaginase as secretory product to avoid formation of inclusion bodies [3741], we tested the ratio of extracytoplasmic secretion to the periplasmic space and culture medium for three recombinant constructs: the native L-asparaginase, the double mutant A38C-T263C, and a C77-105S mutant that lacks the natural disulfide bridge. The presence of catalytic activity was measured in the clear culture medium after biomass centrifugation and in the periplasmic space fraction obtained by osmotic shock. It was found that for each independent construct the secretion ratio did not vary significantly, a similar amount of catalytic activity was found in both the culture medium and periplasmic fraction. On the contrary, the absolute productivity (U/g) varied between the three constructs. The native construct exhibited ~4.1-fold secretory expression compared to the A38C-T263C mutant, while the C77-105S mutant showed almost no expression (Table 3).

Table 3. Extracytoplasmic secretion of recombinant L-asparaginase constructs.

Culture medium Periplasmic space
Sample Productivity (U/g) Ratio (%)b Productivity (U/g) Ratio (%)b
Native 1273 ± 74 40.3 ± 6.4 1883 ± 152 59.7 ± 6.3
A38C-T263C 324 ± 35 42.9 ± 9.8 431 ± 20 57.1 ± 5.3
C77-105Sa 31 ± 7 13 ± 2

aThe C77-105S mutant exhibited insignificant signal and thus the secretion ratio was not calculated.

bSecretion ratio was calculated as percentage of total extracytoplasmic secretion.

Reported values are the averages with the standard deviations.

The results from secretory expression suggest that the presence of cysteine residues in L-asparaginase is a factor inhibiting secretion of the enzyme, despite of the constructs all having the natural signaling peptide [43]. The almost-full inhibition of extracytoplasmic secretion (~70 times less than the native) by the C77-105S mutation may be related to the mechanism used by E. coli to translocate the recombinant protein through the cytoplasmic membrane. Introduction of additional cysteines (A38C-T263C mutant) while still maintaining the natural disulfide bridge (between C77 and C105) affected secretion to a lesser degree, which may be just an inherent consequence of a lower Cys-tRNA abundance in the expression organism [42]. The question that now arises is whether the position of the natural cysteines plays any important role in L-asparaginase secretion, or if solely the presence is sufficient. This is the first study that reports removal or introduction of cysteine residues in L-asparaginase and its effect on extracytoplasmic expression.

Effect of natural disulfide bond mutation on catalytic activity

The specific catalytic activity of the recombinant L-asparaginase C77-105S mutant was determined to evaluate the feasibility of using this mutant in future studies. It is possible to conjugate the natural cysteines in L-asparaginase (C77 and C105) using propenyl systems as reported by Balan et al. (2007). Therefore, these residues could interfere when such type of conjugation chemistry is used in conjunction with introduced cysteine residues. However, in the case of the present study it is unlikely for the natural cysteines to interfere with the thiol-maleimide reaction because of the proximity of the sulfur atoms (2.086 Å) [34] and the low solvent accessible area of the natural cysteines in comparison with the recombinant residues introduced by mutagenesis (13.8 vs. 89.3 Å2).

Nevertheless, it is beneficial for future studies to understand the importance of this natural disulfide bridge on the catalytic activity of L-asparaginase. This C77-C105 bond is relatively away from the active site (~35 Å) [1], and does not significantly impact the catalytic activity after been reduced [65]. The solvent accessible area decreases upon formation of the tetrameric-structure suggesting that hydrophobic interactions on the internal subunits interface stabilize the quaternary structure [64], while binding of the L-Asn substrate promotes additional structural stabilization [63]. Therefore, elimination of the natural disulfide bond should not significantly affect the catalytic activity. We replaced the cysteine amino acids (C77 and C105) by two serine residues with the intention of minimizing any alteration of the surrounding environment of these residues. We found no significant difference in the specific activity exhibited by the native L-asparaginase and C77-105S mutant (Table 4). This implies that removal of the natural disulfide bond should not destabilize the tetrameric-structure of L-asparaginase.

Table 4. Catalytic activity of L-asparaginase C77-105S mutant.

Sample Specific activity (U/mg) Relative activity (%)a
Natural 177 ± 11 100
Native 156 ± 14 88 ± 10
C77-105S 160 ± 9 91 ± 7

aSpecific activity of commercial natural L-asparaginase II (Millipore Sigma, USA) was defined as 100%.

Reported values are the averages with the standard deviations calculated by error propagation.

Computational analysis was used to evaluate possible structural disturbances caused by the C77-105S mutation in the vicinity of the natural disulfide bridge. The original structure from Swain et al. (1993) was used as starting coordinates for the natural cysteines (C77 and C105) along with four residues (D76, D78, K104, and D106) contained in the model [1]. After this model was geometrically optimized, the sulfur atoms in the cysteines were replaced by hydroxyl groups to generate the serine residues, and the resulting structure was optimized. Interestingly, the C77-105S mutation does not cause significant structural disturbances, as revealed by the superposition of the two optimized structures (Fig 6). It is highly possible that one hydrogen bond (1.828 Å O···HO) is formed between the serine residues. More details are presented in the supporting information (S6 and S7 Files). These calculations agree with the catalytic activity observed for the C77-105S mutant, showing that no structural disturbance takes place hence the active site should not be affected. These findings support the hypothesis that formation of the tetrameric-structure of L-asparaginase should be driven by other forces such as hydrophobic interactions and substrate biding [18,63,64].

Fig 6. Computational analysis of the C77-105S mutation.

Fig 6

(A) Superposition of geometrically optimized structures of the natural disulfide bond and the C77-105S mutation. (B) Formation of a new hydrogen bond in the C77-105S mutant.

Purification

The purification of the recombinant L-asparaginase constructs was performed by a single step of anion exchange chromatography [45,46], using a high resolution MonoQ 8-ml column. The pellet from a 200 ml-culture sample was subjected to osmotic shock, and the clear crude mixture was purified on the MonoQ colunm. The native L-asparaginase was successfully purified with >95% purity (by SDS-PAGE) along three 1 ml-fractions (S8 File). The final overall yield for this construct was 29 mg of pure L-asparaginase per liter of culture, which is excellent although not as good as in previous reports using affinity purification methods [37,38,40]. Unfortunately, a His-tag affinity purification has been reported to interfere with the catalytic activity of L-asparaginase [38] and for this reason we designed our expression system with the intention of producing a native L-asparaginase without any modification. The mutant A38C-T263C was also purified with a good recovery although the purity was inferior (65% by SDS-PAGE) compared to native L-asparaginase (S9 File). This was unexpected since both constructs have the same calculated isoelectric point (pI 5.8). At this point, it can only be assumed that the non-natural cysteines in the mutant may interfere in some way with the column binding. By last, the mutant C77-105S was purified with a very low yield, although this was expected because of the poor secretory expression observed (Table 3), the purity was also inferior compared to the other constructs (35% by SDS-PAGE) (S9 File).

The relative molecular weight of the recombinant L-asparaginase constructs was calculated by mass spectroscopy. The main m/z peak was observed at 34605 g/mol for the native L-asparaginase, while 34634 g/mol for the mutant A38C-T263C (Fig 7). Unfortunately, it was not possible to obtain detailed information for the mutant C77-105S due to the limited amount of sample and the level of impurities. These results agree with the molecular weight calculated theoretically for the native L-asparaginase and mutant A38C-T263C, i.e., 34.60 and 34.63 kDa respectively. Both constructs were purified in its mature form since the pre-L-asparaginase should have a subunit mass around 36.8 kDa [43], we concluded that the natural signaling peptide was properly excised.

Fig 7. Subunit mass of recombinant native and mutant A38C-T263C L-asparaginase.

Fig 7

The m/z peak for the native L-asparaginase subunit (in green) was observed at 34605 g/mol, while the m/z peak for the mutant A38C-T263C subunit (in black) was observed at 34634 g/mol.

MS/MS analysis was performed with the recombinant native L-asparaginase to confirm its identity. The peptides m/z pattern matched the theoretical trypsin-digested precursors pattern of E. coli L-asparaginase II from the Mascot database with a protein-score of 118 and 46% sequence coverage (S10 File). In the Mascot database, protein-scores are calculated as -10·log(R), with R being the probability that the observed pattern is a random match. A score greater than 74 is considered significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Herein we report an alternative cysteine-directed conjugation strategy to PEGylate the therapeutic enzyme L-asparaginase at non-natural positions introduced by mutagenesis. Our strategy will directly impact the improvement of this biological drug as new recombinant formulations of this enzyme are introduced to the market. Three main conclusions that could further the knowledge in the field of protein PEGylation are derived from this work. First, the molecular weight of L-asparaginase can be increased by crosslinking the subunits without the need to modify the protein excessively with PEGs. This knowledge can be applied to design new L-asparaginase bio-conjugates to enhance the delay of glomerular filtration. Second, PEGylation can be targeted at pre-selected positions along the L-asparaginase surface by the introduction of recombinant cysteine residues. This is especially useful in potential future studies to assay the proteolytic and immunogenic susceptibility of L-asparaginase at pre-selected epitopes on the protein surface. Third, it was found that intramolecular crosslinking of the L-asparaginase subunits seems to stabilize the active tetrameric-structure and subsequently enhances its catalytic activity.

In addition, we were able to generate a bio-PEG-conjugate of L-asparaginase by a simple and effective ultrafiltration crosslinking method. This 5kDa-PEG-conjugate was fully soluble and exhibited a molecular weight equal or higher compared to randomly-PEGylated formulations previously reported in the literature, while retaining full catalytic activity. We propose that this is possible due to a tetrameric-structure stabilization effect that accelerates the formation of the active quaternary structure of L-asparaginase. Finally, this is the first study that describes the introduction and removal of cysteine residues in L-asparaginase and its effects on catalytic activity, and we found that this type of mutations has significant consequences for the proper extracellular expression of L-asparaginase in E. coli and for the purification of these mutants by anion exchange chromatography.

Supporting information

S1 File. Densitometry analysis of SDS-PAGE gels.

(PDF)

S2 File. Recovery of cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking by ultrafiltration.

(PDF)

S3 File. Correction of L-asparaginase concentration derived from densitometry analysis.

(PDF)

S4 File. Calculation of asparaginase specific catalytic activity.

(PDF)

S5 File. Optimization of secretory expression.

(PDF)

S6 File. Geometrically optimized model structures for C77-105S mutation.

(PDF)

S7 File. Geometrically optimized bond lengths and angles of model structures.

(PDF)

S8 File. Purification of recombinant native L-asparaginase.

(PDF)

S9 File. Purification of L-asparaginase mutants.

(PDF)

S10 File. Precursor peptides pattern of the recombinant native L-asparaginase.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This work was developed with materials, instrumentation and facilities provided by Kai Griebenow’s research laboratory at Facundo Bueso building at the University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras campus, the Molecular Sciences Research Center at the UPR, and RISE Program at UPR Rio Piedras NIH Grant No. 5R25GM061151-16. We like to thank Arthur D. Tinoco for his help with the mass spectroscopy instrumentation.

Data Availability

All data is contained within the paper and Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Materials, instrumentation and research facilities provided by Kai Griebenow’s laboratory at Facundo Bueso Building at the University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras campus. Instrumentation and research facilities provided by the Molecular Sciences Research Center at the University of Puerto Rico. Research materials and student stipend provided by the RISE Program at the University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras Campus, NIH Grant No. 5R25GM061151-16.

References

  • 1.Swain AL, Jaskólski M, Housset D, Mohana Rao JK, Wlodawer A. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli L-asparaginase, an enzyme used in cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(4): 1474–1478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lanvers-Kaminsky C. Asparaginase pharmacology: challenges still to be faced. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79(3): 439–450. 10.1007/s00280-016-3236-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van den Berg H. Asparaginase revisited. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52(2): 168–178. 10.3109/10428194.2010.537796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Avramis VI, Tiwari PN. Asparaginase (native ASNase or pegylated ASNase) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Nanomedicine. 2006;1(3): 241–254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shrivastava A, Khan AA, Khurshid M, Kalam MA, Jain SK, Singhal PK. Recent developments in L-asparaginase discovery and its potential as anticancer agent. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;100: 1–10. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Narta UK, Kanwar SS, Azmi W. Pharmacological and clinical evaluation of L-asparaginase in the treatment of leukemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;61(3): 208–221. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krishnapura PR, Belur PD, Subramanya S. A critical review on properties and applications of microbial L-asparaginases. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(5): 720–737. 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1022505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel N, Krishnan S, Offman MN, Krol M, Moss CX, Leighton C, et al. A dyad of lymphoblastic lysosomal cysteine proteases degrades the antileukemic drug L-asparaginase. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(7): 1964–1973. 10.1172/JCI37977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu C, Kawedia JD, Cheng C, Pei D, Fernandez CA, Cai X, et al. Clinical utility and implications of aspraginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2012;26(11): 2303–2309. 10.1038/leu.2012.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mishra P, Nayak B, Dey RK. PEGylation in anti-cancer therapy: an overview. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(3): 337–348. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Veronese FM, Mero A. The impact of PEGylation on biological therapies. Biodrugs. 2008;22(5): 315–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Milla P, Dosio F, Cattel L. PEGylation of proteins and liposomes: a powerful and flexible strategy to improve the drug delivery. Curr Drug Metab. 2012;13(1): 105–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Avramis VI, Sencer S, Periclou AP, Sather H, Bostrom BC, Cohen LJ, et al. A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children’s Cancer Group study. Blood. 2002;99(6): 1986–1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Solá RJ, Castillo B, Cintró-Colón HR, Rivera-Rivera I, Barletta G, et al. Stabilization of alpha-chymotrypsin upon PEGylation correlates with reduced structural dynamics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;101(6): 1142–1149. 10.1002/bit.22014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Rivera-Rivera I, Solá RJ, Griebenow K. Enzymatic activity and thermal stability of PEG-alpha-chymotrypsin conjugates. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31(6): 883–887. 10.1007/s10529-009-9947-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ashihara Y, Kono T, Yamazaki S, Inada Y. Modification of E. coli L-asparaginase with polyethylene glycol: disappearance of binding ability to anti-asparaginase serum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978;83(2): 385–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Qian G, Ma J, Zhou J, He B, Wang D. Chemical modification of E. coli L-asparaginase with polyethylene glycol grafted vinylpyrrolidone-maleic anhydride copolymer. Polym Adv Technol. 1997;8(10): 581–586. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soares AL, Guimarães GM, Polakiewicz B, de Moreles Pitombo RN, Abrahão-Neto J. Effects of polyethylene glycol attachment on physicochemical and biological stability of E. coli L-asparaginase. Int J Pharm. 2002;237(1–2): 163–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang B, Cao Y, Chi S, Lou D. A PEGylation technology of L-asparaginase with monomethoxy polyethylene glycol-propionaldehyde. Z Naturforsch C. 2012;67(5–6): 312–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matsushima A, Nishimura N, Ashihara Y, Yokota Y, Inada Y. L-Asparaginase modification with monomethoxypolyethylene glycol. Chem Lett. 1980;7: 773–776. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kamisaki Y, Wada H, Yagura T, Matsushima A, Inada Y. Reduction in immunogenicity and clearance rate of Escherichia coli L-asparaginase by modification with monomethoxypolyethylene glycol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981;216(2): 410–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kodera Y, Sekine T, Yasukohchi T, Kiriu Y, Hiroto M, Matsushima A, et al. Stabilization of L-asparaginase modified with comb-shaped poly(ethylene glycol) derivatives, in vivo and in vitro. Bioconjug Chem. 1994;5(4): 283–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Asselin BL, Lorenson MY, Whitin JC, Coppola DJ, Kende AS, Blakley RL, et al. Measurement of serum L-asparagine in the presence of L-asparaginase requires the presence of an L-asparaginase inhibitor. Cancer Res. 1991;51(24): 6568–6573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Armstrong JK, Hempel G, Koling S, Chan LS, Fisher T, Meiselman HJ, et al. Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer. 2007;110(1): 103–111. 10.1002/cncr.22739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garay RP, El-Gewely R, Armstrong JK, Garratty G, Richette P. Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy subjects and in patients treated with PEG-conjugated agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(11): 1319–1323. 10.1517/17425247.2012.720969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hashimoto Y, Shimizu T, Mima Y, Abu Lila AS, Ishida T, Kiwada H. Generation, characterization and in vivo biological activity of two distinct monoclonal anti-PEG IgMs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;277(1): 30–38. 10.1016/j.taap.2014.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Swierczewska M, Lee KC, Lee S. What is the future of PEGylated therapies? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2015;20(4): 531–536. 10.1517/14728214.2015.1113254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tallal L, Tan C, Oettgen H, Wollner N, McCarthy M, Helson L, et al. E. coli L‐asparaginase in the treatment of leukemia and solid tumors in 131 children. Cancer. 1970;25(2): 306–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sutow WW, Garcia F, Starling KA, Williams TE, Lane DM, Gehan EA. L‐asparaginase therapy in children with advanced leukemia. The Southwest Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group. Cancer. 1971;28(4): 819–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shaunak S, Godwin A, Choi JW, Balan S, Pedone E, Vijayarangam D, et al. Site-specific PEGylation of native disulfide bonds in therapeutic proteins. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2(6): 312–313. 10.1038/nchembio786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jevsevar S, Kunstelj M, Porekar VG. PEGylation of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol J. 2010;5(1): 113–128. 10.1002/biot.200900218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang C, Yang XL, Yuan YH, Pu J, Liao F. Site-specific PEGylation of therapeutic proteins via optimization of both accessible reactive amino acid residues and PEG derivatives. Biodrugs. 2012;26(4): 209–215. 10.2165/11633350-000000000-00000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dozier JK, Distefano MD. Site-specific pegylation of therapeutic proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10): 25831–25864. 10.3390/ijms161025831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Balan S, Choi JW, Godwin A, Teo I, Laborde CM, Heidelberger S, et al. Site-specific PEGylation of protein disulfide bonds using a three-carbon bridge. Bioconjug Chem. 2007;18(1): 61–76. 10.1021/bc0601471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brocchini S, Godwin A, Balan S, Choi JW, Zloh M, Shaunak S. Disulfide bridge based PEGylation of proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008; 60(1): 3–12. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nair DP, Podgórski M, Chatani S, Gong T, Xi W, Fenoli CR, et al. The thiol-Michael addition click reaction: a powerful and widely used tool in materials chemistry. Chem Mater. 2014;26(1): 724–744. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khushoo A, Pal Y, Singh BN, Mukherjee KJ. Extracellular expression and single step purification of recombinant Escherichia coli l-asparaginase II. Protein Expr Purif. 2004;38(1): 29–36. 10.1016/j.pep.2004.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khushoo A, Pal Y, Mukherjee KJ. Optimization of extracellular production of recombinant asparaginase in Escherichia coli in shake-flask and bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;68(2): 189–197. 10.1007/s00253-004-1867-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vidya J, Vasudevan UM, Soccol CR, Pandey A. Cloning, functional expression and characterization of L-asparaginase II from E. coli MTCC 739. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2011;49(3): 286–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muharram MM, Abulhamd AT, Mounir M, Bekhet S. Recombinant expression, purification of L-asparaginase II from thermotolerant E. coli strain and evaluation of its antiproliferative activity. African J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(15): 1610–1619. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Upadhyay AK, Singh A, Mukherjee KJ, Panda AK. Refolding and purification of recombinant L-asparaginase from inclusion bodies of E. coli into active tetrameric protein. Front Microbiol. 2014;5(486): 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mergulhão FJ, Summers DK, Monteiro GA. Recombinant protein secretion in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Adv. 2005;23(3): 177–202. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jennings MP, Beacham IR. Analysis of the Escherichia coli gene encoding L-asparaginase-II, ansB, and its regulation by cyclic AMP receptor and FNR proteins. J Bacteriol. 1990;172(3): 1491–1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA III, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6: 343–345. 10.1038/nmeth.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Roberts J, Burson G, Hill JM. New procedures for purification of L-asparaginase with high yield from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1968;95(6): 2117–2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ho PP, Frank BH, Burck PJ. Crystalline L-asparaginase from Escherichia coli B. Science. 1969:165(3892): 510–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wriston JC Jr. Asparaginase. Metods in Enzymology. 1985;113: 608–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho PP, Milikin EB, Bobbitt JL, Grinnan EL, Burck PJ, Frank BH, et al. Crystalline L-asparaginase from Escherichia coli B. I. Purification and chemical characterization. J Biol Chem. 1970;245(14): 3708–3715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kussman M, Nordhoff E, Rahbek-Nielsen H, Haebel S, Rossel-Larsen M, Jakobsen L, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectroscopy sample preparation techniques designed for various peptide and protein analytes. J Mass Spectrom. 1997;32: 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Riddles PW, Blakeley RL, Zerner B. Ellman’s reagent: 5,5’-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) a reexamination. Anal Biochem. 1979;94(1): 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cheung DT, Nimni ME. Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde I: reaction with model compounds. Connect Tissue Res. 1982;10(2): 187–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Becke AD. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys. 1993;98: 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colic-Salvetti correlation-energy into a functional of the electron density formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1988;37(2): 785–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09, revision B. 01. Wallingford CT, 2009.
  • 55.Vreven T, Mennucci B, Da Silva CO, Morokuma K, Tomasi J. The ONIOM-PCM method: Combining the hybrid molecular orbital method and the polarizable continuum model for solvation. Application to the geometry and properties of a merocyanine in solution. J Chem Phys. 2001;115: 62–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gesto DS, Cerqueira NMFSA, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Unraveling the enigmatic mechanism of L-asparaginase II with QM/QM calculations. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(19): 7146–7158. 10.1021/ja310165u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jackson CJC, Charlton JL, Kuzminski K, Lang GM, Sehon AH. Synthesis, isolation, and characterization of conjugates of ovalbumin with monomethoxypolyethylene glycol using cyanuric chloride as the coupling agent. Anal Biochem. 1987;165(1): 114–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Balcão VM, Mateo C, Fernández-Lafuente R, Malcata FX, Guisán JM. Structural and functional stabilization of L-asparaginase via multisubunit immobilization onto highly activated supports. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17(3): 537–542. 10.1021/bp000163r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Handschumacher RE, Gaumond C. Modification of L-asparaginase by subunit cross-linking with dimethylsuberimidate. Mol Pharmacol. 1972;8(1): 59–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Solá RJ, Griebenow K. Glycosylation of therapeutic proteins: an effective strategy to optimize efficacy. Biodrugs. 2010;24(1): 9–21. 10.2165/11530550-000000000-00000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ulu A, Ates B. Immobilization of L-asparaginase on carrier materials: a comprehensive review. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28(6): 1598–1610. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sharkey I, Boddy AV, Wallace H, Mycroft J, Hollis R, Picton S. Body surface area estimation in children using weight alone: application in paediatric oncology. Br J Cancer. 2001;85(1): 23–28. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shifrin S, Parrott CL, Luborsky SW. Substrate binding and intersubunit interactions in L-asparaginase. J Biol Chem. 1974;249(5): 1335–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stecher AL, de Deus PM, Polikarpov I, Abrahão-Neto J. Stability of L -asparaginase : an enzyme used in leukemia treatment. Pharm Acta Helv. 1999;74(1): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Todokoro K, Saito T, Obata M, Yamazaki S, Tamaura Y, Inada Y. Studies on conformation and antigenicity of reduced s-methylated asparaginase in comparison with asparaginase. FEBS Lett. 1975;60(2): 259–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Densitometry analysis of SDS-PAGE gels.

(PDF)

S2 File. Recovery of cysteine-directed PEGylation crosslinking by ultrafiltration.

(PDF)

S3 File. Correction of L-asparaginase concentration derived from densitometry analysis.

(PDF)

S4 File. Calculation of asparaginase specific catalytic activity.

(PDF)

S5 File. Optimization of secretory expression.

(PDF)

S6 File. Geometrically optimized model structures for C77-105S mutation.

(PDF)

S7 File. Geometrically optimized bond lengths and angles of model structures.

(PDF)

S8 File. Purification of recombinant native L-asparaginase.

(PDF)

S9 File. Purification of L-asparaginase mutants.

(PDF)

S10 File. Precursor peptides pattern of the recombinant native L-asparaginase.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All data is contained within the paper and Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES