Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology logoLink to Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology
. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):134–140.

LACK Gene’s Immune Response Induced by Cocktail DNA Vaccine with IL-12 Gene Against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in BALB/c Mice

Oghlniaz Jorjani 1, Fatemeh Ghaffarifar 2,*, Zohreh Sharifi 3, Abdolhossein Dalimi 2, Hajar Ziaei-Hezarjaribi 4, Benyamin Talebi 5
PMCID: PMC6064009  PMID: 30090205

Abstract

Background:

Leishmaniasis is caused by parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania which is an obligate intracellular parasite in the infected host. Individuals who have been recovered from clinical leishmaniasis develop strong immunity against reinfection. DNA vaccines are the new type of vaccines that induce expression of protein eukaryotic cells. DNA vaccines can be stimulated by the cellular and humoral immune responses using one or several genes.

Methods:

A DNA vaccine containing plasmids encoding the pcLACK+pcTSA genes of Leishmania major (L. major) (MHRO/IR/75/ER) in the vicinity of IL-12 gene expression was made and then its protective efficacy in comparison with single-gene of LACK was evaluated. Also, BALB/c mice were immunized intramuscularly three times. The humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated after immunization with pcLACK, pcLACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12, and then challenged with L. major.

Results:

Humoral response and IFN-γ values were significantly higher than control groups after immunization with pcLACK, pcLACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 and challenge with L. major (p≤0.05). IL-4 values were increased in the control groups in such a way that they were remarkably higher than the pcLACK, pcLACK+pcTSA+ pCAGGS-IL12 groups (p≤0.05) after immunization and challenge with L. major.

Conclusion:

The survival time of the immunized mice with pcLACK, pcLACK+pcTSA+ pCAGGS-IL12 groups was higher than the control groups. Then, DNA vaccine of pcLACK appeared to be likely able to induce more protection against infection with L. major in mice. Therefore, cocktail DNA is effective to enhance specific immunity.

Keywords: Cutaneous leishmaniasis, DNA vaccine, Immune response

Introduction

Leishmaniasis is caused by a protozoan called Leishmania major (L. major) which is widespread throughout the world 1. Species of Leishmania cause human diseases that form cutaneous lesions to Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL). Additionally, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is produced by L. major, Leishmania tropica (L. tropica) and Leishmania aethiopica (L. aethiopica) in the Old World 2,3. Almost 350 million people are at the risk of acquiring the various forms of the disease and also the annual incidence of new cases is around 1.5 million CL cases 4. Lack of effective, low-cost treatments and the irreversibility of tissue damage during infection make it necessary to develop an effective vaccine that is protective against diseases caused by diverse species of Leishmania 5.

Vaccination strategies are based on the current understanding of the characteristics of an effective anti-leishmania immune response. Studies on animal models emphasized the role of cellular immunity in controlling leishmaniasis 6.

Recently, DNA vaccine was considered as an effective method to control disease depending cellular immune response 7. In order to produce the DNA vaccine, preferred gene consists of a eukaryotic expression vector to encode antigen 8. In recent years, various antigens, L. major, were investigated as candidates for DNA vaccine. Antigens of leishmania homolog of receptors for activated c-kinase (LACK) and Thiol-Specific-Antioxidant (TSA) have been reported as the preventive vaccine candidates 9,10.

LACK is a 36 kDa protein and expressed in both stages of the leishmania parasite life cycle 11. LACK gene is placed on the chromosome 28 and is composed of 939 bp 12. This protein has been shown to be protective when used as a DNA vaccine in mice by redirecting IL-4 responses to protective Th1 response 10.

TSA gene is 600 bp and located on the chromosome 15 (22 kDa). Protein of TSA is expressed in promastigote and amastigote of Leishmania species 1,13–15.

LACK vaccine requires adjuvant of IL-12 to exert its protective efficacy against Leishmania 16.

IL-12 can redirect early Th2 response to Leishmania in murine, and it also can rapidly enhance the IL-4 production which is initiated basically from the Th2 cells maturation and development resistance against Leishmania parasite. Therefore, IL-12 is required for resistance to L. major 17.

Studies revealed a high protection in BALB/c model against L. major after DNA vaccine using a cocktail of plasmids 18. Given the recent investigations, murine model was protected against L. major due to pre-immunization with a cocktail of plasmids encoding to LACK, TSA and LmSTI1 antigens. This protection is commonly provided by the synergistic effect of humoral and cellular immunity 18–20.

Based on the literature, this study aimed at exploring the possibility of elevating the immune response by adding IL-12 genetic adjuvant to the DNA cocktail containing plasmids encoding the genes of L. major and examining its immune response as well as protective efficacy in comparison with single-gene vaccine (pcLACK) and control groups (PBS, pcDNA3, pCAG GS-IL12).

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

This project was approved by the Ethical Committee of School of Medical Sciences of Tarbiat Modares University and also by the Medical Ethics Committee in 2010.

Mice

BALB/c mice were bought from Iran’s Razi Serum and Vaccine Production Research Institute. All mice were maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions. Female mice aged between six to eight weeks were included in the survey.

Parasites

Tarbiat Modares University Parasitology Department provided MHRO/IR/75/ER of L. major. Promastigotes were grown at 26°C in RPMI1640 medium (Sigma®) complemented with 10% heat- inactivated Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) (Gibco®), 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin. Promastigotes were collected at the stationary growth phase by centrifugation and finally washed three times with PBS.

Construction of recombinant plasmids

The following L. major genes were chosen as DNA vaccine candidates: LACK, TSA. These genes were sub-cloned to the eukaryotic expression vector PcDNA3 by following standard molecular biology techniques. The single-gene expression plasmid of pcDNA3-LACK that encodes the LACK (939 bp, 36 kDa) antigen was constructed by our laboratory. Forward and reverse primers were designed as follows: forward primer introduced Hind III recognition site, underlined 5′-ATT AAG CTT ATG AAC TAC GAG GGT CAC CTG AAG GG-3′ and reverse primer introduced EcoRI recognition site underlined 5′-TTA GAA TTC TTA CTC GGC GTC GGA GAT −3′ 21.

The gene expression plasmid pcDNA3-TSA (pc TSA), encoding TSA (600 bp, 22 kDa) antigen was produced at Tarbiat Modares University, Iran 18.

To confirm the gene expression, six-histidine tag (6-His tag) sequence was designed in the forward primer. The designed forward and reverse primers were as follows: forward primer introduced Hind III recognition site underlined 5′-CAA TTA AA GCT TAT ATG CAT CAC CAT CAC CAT CAC ATG TCC TGC GGT AAC GCC AAG-3′, and reverse primer introduced EcoRI recognition site underlined 5′-CAT GGA ATT CTT ACT GCT TGC TGA AGT ATCC-3′.

Recombinant IL-12 plasmid contains a part of the gene expressing IL-12 which was constructed in the form of pCAGGS-IL-12 that was kindly donated by Dr. Masanori Matsui (University of Tokyo, Japan). All the recombinant plasmids were transformed into the TG1 E. coli strain.

Plasmid purification

The plasmid extraction kit (Qiagen Germany) was used for plasmid purification according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Then, plasmids concentration was measured by spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. The 260:280 absorption ratio was between 1.8 and 2.0.

Antigen preparation

Soluble Leishmania antigen was prepared from stationary phase promastigotes of L. major after a few passages in Schneider’s medium. About 2×106 of L. major promastigotes were washed five times in cold sterile PBS containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF). L. major antigen was prepared by freezing and thawing method. Concentration of antigen was measured by Bradford method. Prior to the usage, the prepared antigen was frozen at −20°C.

Classification of mice

Initially, mice were grouped. The name and number of mice in each group are shown in table 1. Treatment groups were as follows: four control groups including PBS, pc-DNA3, pCAGGS-IL-12, and pCAGGS-IL-12+pcDNA3 and two experimental groups including pcLACK, pcLACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12.

Table 1.

Classification of mice according to the injection substances

Groups under study according to the injection substance Total number of mice Number of mice of immunological evaluations (no challenging) Number of mice of immunological evaluations after challenging Number of mice of survival time, diameter of lesion and weight evaluations after challenging
PBS 15 5 5 5
pcDNA3 15 5 5 5
pCAGGS-IL12 15 5 5 5
pCAGGS-IL12 pcDNA3+ 15 5 5 5
pcLACK 24 8 8 8
pcLACK+ pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 24 8 8 8
Open in a new tab

Immunization and challenge of mice

Mice were immunized three times at a 3 week interval with 100 μg of plasmid DNA suspended in 100 μl sterile PBS, 50 μl in each thigh skeletal muscle.

Three weeks after the last immunization, the mice of each group (immunized and control mice) were challenged at the base of tail by the intradermal (I.D) route with 2×106 promastigotes of L. major (strain MHRO/IR/75/ER). The lesions appeared at the second week in the control groups and the third week in the immunized groups. Thereafter, measuring the diameter of lesion (n=five per group) was monitored weekly at the site of inoculation by a Vernier caliper. Then, animals were sacrificed, and the spleens and serum samples were harvested for immunological analysis.

Evaluation of cellular immunity

To evaluate the cellular immunity of mice, the level of total IL-4 and IFN-γ against L. major was tested by the two samples using the ELISA method (Farnandez-Botran, 2001). Seven weeks after the final injection, splenocyte suspensions were prepared from immunized mice as follows: the spleens were removed under sterile conditions and then crushed in a 6 cm sterile plate containing 5 ml of cold sterile PBS solution (4°C, the suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 300×g, 4°C). Afterwards, lymphocytes were extracted from the spleen cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, BRL, Maryland, USA), and 20% FCS (Gibco, BRL, Maryland, USA) in 24-well plates (Nalge-Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) at 2×106 cells/ml. Then, they were allowed to multiply for 72 hr in the medium alone (control group), in the presence of SLA with concentration of 40 lg/ml (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany) incubated as mitogen at 37°C and 5% CO2. After collecting cell supernatant, a DuoSet ELISA Development Kit (R&D) was used to evaluate the presence of cytokines IL-4 and IFN-γ in the cellular suspension of the spleen lymphocytes of mice immunized with the aforementioned plasmids. The materials and solutions were prepared according to the guidelines of the kit, and then, the standard curve was drawn according to the current standard, and samples were finally evaluated.

Evaluation of humoral immunity

The sera of mice were collected three weeks after the last vaccination and seven weeks after the challenge. Prior to usage, sera were kept at −20°C. To detect the levels of anti-L. major Ig G, the sera were tested with ELISA kits. The 96 wells-plates were coated at 4°C overnight with soluble L. major antigens at concentration of 10 μg/ml prepared in 100 mM carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH=9.6). Blocking was carried out with 5% dried skimmed milk in PBS (pH=7.2) for 2 hr at the room temperature. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) (PBST20), the sera were diluted 1/100 in 5% dried skimmed milk-PBST20 (100 lL per well) and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. After washing, the bound antibodies were detected by incubation for 2 hr at 37°C with anti-mouse IgG conjugated with peroxidase (DA-KO, Denmark) at 1/2000 dilution in 5% dried skimmed milk-PBST20. Peroxidase activity was revealed by adding 100 μl per well of tetra methyl benzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) in dark. The reaction was stopped after adding 100 μl of sulfuric acid and Optical Density (OD) was read at 450 nm by the ELISA micro plate reader (Bio-Rad, USA) 22.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons between the experimental groups were carried out with an Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test. Statistical analysis of survival time was applied with Kaplan-Meier (Log-Rank) test for five mice per each group. The level of significance was considered as p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Evaluation of survival time in immunized and control mice after challenge

Results indicated that the survival rate in vaccinated group was significantly longer than the control groups (p<0.05). In group immunized with vaccine containing pcLACK, the survival rate increased more than the one with pcLACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 and control groups (p<0.05). Mortality in the pCAGGS-IL12, pC-AGGS-IL-12+pcDNA3 control groups started respectively in six and seven weeks after the challenge, and all mice of control groups died in 13 weeks.

But mortality in groups immunized with vaccine pc-LACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12, pcLACK began accordingly in 11, 13 weeks after the challenge of mice with L. major. Survival rate in the pcLACK group was 62.5% at week 32, while it was 37.5% in the pcLACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 group These results state that the survival time in pcLACK group was significantly longer than the group vaccinated with pc-LACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 (p<0.05) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Survival of immunized BALB/c mice after challenge with 2×106 promastigotes of L. major, four weeks after the last immunization.

Measurement of lesion size in immunized and control groups

The mean size of leisons was measured in immunized groups during 16 weeks after the challenge with 2×106 L. major promastigotes. Lesions with mean size of 1.2 mm were observed three weeks after the challenge in the control groups, while, the mean size of lesions in the groups immunized with pcLACK+pc-TSA+pCAGGS-IL12, pcLACK 0.35 mm was observed four weeks after the challenge. Results indicated that the mean size of lesions in vaccinated group was meaningfully different from the control groups after the challenge (p<0.05) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

The lesion size of immunized BALB/c after the challenge with 2×106 promastigotes of L. major.

Evaluation of number of parasites in the spleen cells of immunized mice after the challenge

The spleen of immunized mice after seven weeks of challenge with 2×106 L. major promastigotes was removed in sterile conditions. The immunized mice had significantly lower parasite loads compared to the control mice (p<0.05). The group vaccinated with pc-LACK+ showed the most amount of reduction in parasite burden in comparison with pcLACK+pcTSA+pC AGGS-IL12 group (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

The logarithmic number of the parasites in the spleen cells of vaccinated mice and control groups after the challenge with L. major promastigotes.

Evaluation of the level of IgG (anti-L. major) in the immunized mice

To study humoral immunity, the level of total IgG against L. major was measured on the sera using the ELISA method. Serum samples were collected from the immunized and control mice three weeks after the final booster injection, and also seven weeks after challenge infection from five mice of each group in the control and eight mice in the immunized group by random selection. Comparison of ODs obtained by the total IgG among the different groups with Mann-Whitney test showed that anti-L. major IgG values increased significantly in the vaccinated groups compared to the control groups in pre and post challenge (p<0.05). The difference between pcLACK vaccine and pc LACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 was significant in pre- and post-challenge as well (p<0.05) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Analysis of the total IgG antibodies in pooled sera of mice. The sera were collected three weeks after the last vaccination and seven weeks after the challenge. Results are expressed as mean of the OD450 nm±SD of the samples.

Measurement of the cytokine production in the immunized mice

To evaluate the cellular immune response in the immunized mice, lymphocyte suspensions were prepared from the spleen of the immunized and control mice three week after the final booster injection and seven weeks after challenge infection. The mean level of IFN-γ between the immunized and control groups was significantly different (p<0.05). Also the level of IFN-γ in mice immunized with pc-LACK was significantly higher compared with those immunized with pc-LACK+pcTSA+pCAGGS-IL12 (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

IFN-ɣ productions of L. major antigen-stimulated spleno-cytes from vaccinated and control mice three weeks after the last vaccination and seven weeks after challenge infection using the ELISA method. Results are expressed as means of the OD450 nm±SD.

The mean level of IL-4 produced by the spleen cells between the immunized and control groups was significantly different (p<0.05). But decreased level of IL-4 in the group vaccinated with the pc-LACK was higher than the group immunized with pcLACK+pcTSA+ pCAGGS-IL12 after and before the challenge; however, this difference was not significant (p<0.05) (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

IL-4 productions of L. major antigen-stimulated spleno-cytes from vaccinated and control mice three weeks after the last vaccination and seven weeks after challenge infection using the ELISA method.

Discussion

DNA vaccines can be useful for protection against leishmaniasis for developing naturally acquired immunity due to primary exposure to L. major. Low dose infection in the skin has recently been shown to be depended on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells 12,23,24.

A lot of progress has been achieved in the field of vaccine against leishmaniasis. Leishmania parasites have different antigens reflecting the complexity of the immune responses against the parasites.

DNA vaccine cocktail is an important strategy for developing the DNA vaccines 25. Studies showed that recombinant genetic adjuvants, IL-12, are required in the development of cellular immune response. The expression of biologically active IL-12 as immune regulation can protect against the intracellular parasites, L. major 26,27.

LACK and TSA genes of Leishmania are candidates of DNA vaccine for L. major. Immunization of BALB/c mice with DNA vaccine cocktail of pcTSA+pcLACK showed strong cellular and humoral immune responses against L. major 18,28.

At present, the ability of pcTSA+pcLACK with pCAGGS-IL-12 genetic adjuvant to elicit protective immunity in DNA vaccine strategy was investigated. Immunization of BALB/c mice with pcTSA+pcLACK +pCAGGS-IL-12 cited the development of cellular immune responses against L. major, while, current findings indicated that immunization of mice with single pcLACK stimulated cellular immune responses which are stronger than vaccination with pcTSA+pc-LACK+pCAGGS-IL-12. The level of IFN-ɣ was enhanced strongly in mice immunized with single pc-LACK, compared with mice immunized with pcTSA+ pcLACK+pCAGGS-IL-12. This result shows that pc-LACK, IL-12 develops Th1 cytokine responses and is effective in treatment of CL 13,18,26.

Detection of total IgG indicated that IgG values against Leishmania were increased markedly in the pcTSA+pcLACK+pCAGGS-IL-12 group compared to the control groups. Anti-leishmania IgG values in the group immunized with single pc-LACK were stronger than the group that received pcTSA+pcLACK+pC-AGGS-IL-12; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

The current results presented that mice immunized with single pcLACK had a longer average survival time than the pcTSA+pcLACK+pCAGGS-IL-12 group. According to the present results, pc-LACK seems to play an important role in the efficacy of Th1 immune response. Sa′nchez-Sampedro et al showed that the ex-pression of LACK protein in a DNA prime/MVA boost regimen can lead to high protective efficacy and a protective Th1 immune response 12,29,30.

Conclusion

It is expected that the use of DNA cocktail with pCAGGS-IL-12 leads to IFN-γ increase and IL-4 decrease, respectively. But, there was no significant difference between groups that received pCAGGS-IL-12 or the ones who did not receive pCAGGS-IL-12. So, it was not possible that the three genes stimulated equally the immune response in a short time.

Our investigation provided basic information for researches in the use of DNA vaccines combined with recombinant plasmid and adjuvant of cytokine in studies of protection against L. major.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Dr. Masanori Matsui of University of Tokyo, Japan.

References

  • 1.Webb JR, Campos-Neto A, Ovendale PJ, Martin TI, Stromberg EJ, Badaro R, et al. Human and murine immune responses to a novel Leishmania major recombinant protein encoded by members of a multicopy gene family. Infect Immun 1998;66(7):3279–3289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization-TDR The TDR fifteenth program report. Research Progress 1999–2000. New and Improved Tools; 2003. www.who.int/tdr/research/progress9900/tools/vdr.htm.
  • 3.Alvar J, Cañavate C, Gutiérrez-Solar B, Jiménez M, Laguna F, López-Vélez R, et al. Leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: the first 10 years. Clin Microbiol Rev 197;10(2):298–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Desjeux P, Alvar J. Leishmania/HIV co-infections: epidemiology in Europe. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2003;97 Suppl 1:3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dumonteil E, McMahon-Pratt D, Price V. Report on the fourth TDR/IDRI meeting on second-generation vaccines against leishmaniasis, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Yucatan, Mexico. Document TDR/PDR/LEISH/VAC/01.1. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sacks D, Noben-Trauth N. The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to Leishmania major in mice. Nat Rev Immunol 2002;2(11):845–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gurunathan S, Wu CY, Freidag BL, Seder RA. DNA vaccines: a key for inducing long-term cellular immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2000;12(4):442–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang DC, DeVit M, Johnston SA. Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response. Nature 1992;356(6365):152–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Méndez S, Gurunathan S, Kamhawi S, Belkaid Y, Moga MA, Skeiky YA, et al. The potency and durability of DNA-and protein-based vaccines against Leishmania major evaluated using low-dose, interadermal challenge. J Immunol 2001;166(8):5122–5128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gurunathan S, Saks DL, Brown DR, Reiner SL, Chavest H, Glaichenhaus N, et al. Vaccination with DNA encoding the immunodominant LACK parasite antigen confers protective immunity to mice infected with Leishmania major. J Exper Med 1997;186(7):1137–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza G, Taladriz S, Marquet A, Larraga V. Molecular cloning, cell localization and binding affinity to DNA replication proteins of the p36/LACK protective antigen from Leishmania infantum. Eur J Biochem 1999;259(3):909–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pérez-Jiménez E, Kochan G, Gherardi MM, Esteban M. MVA-LACK as a safe and efficient vector for vaccination against leishmaniasis. Microbes Infect 2006;8(3): 810–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Monnerat S, Martinez-Calvillo S, Worthey E, Myler PJ, Stuart KD, Fasel N. Genomic organization and gene expression in a chromosomal region of Leishmania major. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2004;134(2):233–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campos-Neto A, Porrozzi R, Greeson K, Coler RN, Webb JR, Seiky YA, et al. Protection against cutaneous Leishmaniasis induced by recombinant antigens in murine and nonhumans primate models of the human disease. Infect Immun 2001;69(6):4103–4108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Campos-Neto A, Webb JR, Greeson K, Coler RN, Skeiky YA, Reed SG. Vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding TSA/LmSTI1 Leishmanial fusion proteins confers protection against Leishmania major Infection in Susceptible BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 2002;70(6):2828–2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stäger S, Smith DF, Kaye PM. Immunization with a recombinant stage-regulated surface protein from Leishmania donovani induces protection against visceral leishmaniasis. J Immunol 2000;165(12):7064–7071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park AY, Hondowicz BD, Scott P. IL-12 is required to maintain a Th1 response during Leishmania major infection. J Immunol 2000;165(2):896–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ghaffarifar F, Jorjani O, Sharifi Z, Dalimi A, Hassan ZM, Tabatabaie F, et al. Enhancement of immune response induced by DNA vaccine cocktail expressing complete LACK and TSA genes against Leishmania major. APMIS 2013;121(4):290–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ahmed SB, Touihri L, Chtourou Y, Dellagi K, Bahloul C. DNA based vaccination with a cocktail of plasmids encoding immunodominant Leishmania (Leishmania) major antigens confers full protection in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 2009;27(1):99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Méndez S, Belkaid Y, Seder RA, Sacks D. Optimization of DNA vaccination against cutaneous leishmaniasis. Vaccine 2002;20(31–32):3702–3708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jorjani O, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, Dalimi A. Cloning and expression of recombinant plasmid containing LACK gene of Leishmania major (MHRO/IR/75/ER) in CHO cells. ISESCO J Sci Technol 2012;8(13):37–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crowther JR. editor. Methods in molecular biology. 1st ed Vol. 42, ELISA theory and practice. New Jersey: Humana Press; 1995. 216 p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ashford RW, Bates PA. Leishmaniasis in the old world. In: Collier L, Balows A, Sussman M, editors. Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial Infections. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 215–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zadeh-Vakili A, Taheri T, Taslimi Y, Doustdari F, Salmanian AH, Rafati S. Immunization with the hybrid protein vaccine, consisting of leishmania major cysteine proteinases type I (CPB) and type II (CPA), partially protects against leishmaniasis. Vaccine 2004;22(15–16): 1930–1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Handman E. Leishmaniasis: current status of vaccine development. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14(2):229–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sakai T, Hisaeda H, Nakano Y, Ishikawa H, Maekawa Y, Ishii K, et al. Gene gun-mediated delivery of an interleukin-12 expression plasmid protects against infections with the intracellular protozoan parasites Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi in mice. Immunology 2000;99(4):615–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hezarjaribi HZ, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, Sharifi Z. Evaluation of protective effect of IL-22 and IL-12 on cutaneous leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2014;7:940–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hezarjaribi HZ, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, Sharifi Z, Jorjani O. Effect of IL-22 on DNA vaccine encoding LACK gene of Leishmania major in BALB/c mice. Exp Parasitol 2013;134(3):341–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ramos I, Alonso A, Marcen JM, Peris A, Castillo JA, Colmenares M, et al. Heterologous prime-boost vaccination with a non-replicative vaccinia recombinant vector expressing LACK confers protection against canine vis ceral leishmaniasis with a predominant Th1-specific immune response. Vaccine 2008;26(3):333–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sánchez-Sampedro L, Gómez CE, Mejías-Pérez E, Sorzano CO, Esteban M. High quality long-term CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory populations stimulated by DNA-LACK/MVA-LACK regimen in Leishmania major BALB/c model of infection. PLoS One 2012;7(6): e38859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Avicenna Research Institute

RESOURCES