Abstract
Several hundred proteins cycle into heterocomplexes with a dimer of the chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), regulating their activity and turnover. There are two isoforms of Hsp90, Hsp90α and Hsp90β, and their relative chaperone activities and composition in these client protein•Hsp90 heterocomplexes has not been determined. Here, we examined the activity of human Hsp90α and Hsp90β in a purified five-protein chaperone machinery that assembles glucocorticoid receptor (GR)•Hsp90 heterocomplexes to generate high-affinity steroid-binding activity. We found that human Hsp90α and Hsp90β have equivalent chaperone activities, and when mixed together in this assay, they formed only GR•Hsp90αα and GR•Hsp90ββ homodimers and no GR•Hsp90αβ heterodimers. In contrast, GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes formed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells also contain GR•Hsp90αβ heterodimers. The formation of GR•Hsp90αβ heterodimers in HEK cells probably reflects the longer time permitted for exchange to form Hsp90αβ heterodimers in the cell versus in the cell-free assembly conditions. This purified GR-activating chaperone machinery can be used to determine how modifications of Hsp90 affect its chaperone activity. To that effect, we have tested whether the unique phosphorylation of Hsp90α at threonines 5 and 7 that occurs during DNA damage repair affects its chaperone activity. We showed that the phosphomimetic mutant Hsp90α T5/7D has the same intrinsic chaperone activity as wild-type human Hsp90α in activation of GR steroid-binding activity by the five-protein machinery, supporting the conclusion that T5/7 phosphorylation does not affect Hsp90α chaperone activity.
Introduction
Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a highly conserved and essential stress protein that is expressed in all eukaryotic cells, where it regulates the activity and turnover of hundreds of proteins called Hsp90 “clients” (Pratt and Toft, 2003; Taipale et al., 2010). The regulation is both ATP-dependent and dynamic in that proteins are continuously cycling into and out of complexes with Hsp90. The heterocomplexes are formed by a multiprotein chaperone machinery that was discovered during studies of Hsp90 regulation of steroid receptors (Pratt and Toft, 2003; Pratt et al., 2008).
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) must be in a complex with Hsp90 to have high-affinity steroid-binding activity. Incubation of Hsp90-free GR with concentrated lysates from eukaryotic cells causes the ATP-dependent formation of GR•Hsp90 complexes and restores high-affinity steroid-binding activity. During the 1990s, the components for generating steroid-binding activity were isolated and reconstituted to yield an efficient Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly system of five proteins—Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp organizer protein (Hop), Hsp40, and p23 (Pratt and Toft, 2003). As cycling with Hsp90 is required for high-affinity glucocorticoid-binding activity in cells, this system affords a physiologically meaningful assay of the intrinsic chaperone activity of Hsp90.
The Agard Lab (University of California, San Francisco) has published a number of cryo-electron microscopy studies showing how the proteins in the Hsp90 chaperone machinery interact and the mechanism of GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (Southworth and Agard, 2011; Kirschke et al., 2014), but there are details of the active complex that have not yet been worked out. For example, there are two isoforms of human Hsp90, Hsp90α (gene Hsp90AA1) and Hsp90β (gene Hsp90AB1), that are 86% homologous in amino acid sequence and are expressed from separate genes, with both isoforms being commonly referred to as Hsp90 (Sreedhar et al., 2004). The functions of Hsp90α and Hsp90β are thought to be largely redundant, and they have the same ability to activate the progesterone receptor (Chadli et al., 2008). However, some differences clearly exist. Hsp90β is constitutively expressed in all cells, whereas Hsp90α is induced during stress and its expression is more tissue-specific (Sreedhar et al., 2004). Mice without Hsp90α are apparently normal, but adult males have arrested spermatogenesis, whereas mouse embryos lacking Hsp90β die at implantation (Voss et al., 2000; Grad et al., 2010).
Dimerization of Hsp90 through the C-terminus is required for in vivo function (Wayne and Bolon, 2007). Although it was shown in 1988 that GR•Hsp90 complexes recovered from cells contain both α and β isoforms (Mendel and Ortí, 1988), it is not known whether Hsp90 is present as homo- (αα, ββ ) or hetero- (αβ) dimers. Indeed, as far as we know, the heterocomplex composition has not been directly determined for any Hsp90 client protein.
In this study, we show by the five-protein system that human Hsp90α and human Hsp90β have the same activity in the activation of GR steroid binding and that steroid binding is activated in direct proportion to the number of GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes formed. Mixing of Hsp90α and Hsp90β under our assay conditions did not yield αβ heterodimers. Expression of FLAG-Hsp90α in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells yielded FLAG-Hsp90α•FLAG-Hsp90α homodimers and virtually no dimers of FLAG-Hsp90α with cellular Hsp90α or Hsp90β. In contrast, GR•Hsp90 complexes isolated from HEK cytosol contained GR•Hsp90αβ dimers. Furthermore, to illustrate the utility of this five-protein GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly system, we examined the effect of T5/7 phosphorylation of Hsp90α on its chaperone activity. This phosphorylation occured only on Hsp90α and it had been unknown whether this directly affects its chaperone activity. We found that the phosphomimetic mutant Hsp90α T5/7D has the same activity as wild-type human Hsp90α in activating GR steroid-binding activity by the purified assembly machinery. This leads us to conclude that this unique modification of Hsp90α, which occurs during DNA double strand-break repair, does not affect its chaperone activity.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
Purified mouse monoclonal IgG2a (clone K41009) used to both immunoadsorb and blot hHsp90α and purified mouse monoclonal IgM (clone K3701) used to immunoblot hHsp90β were purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY). Purified mouse monoclonal IgG2a (clone H9010) used to immunoadsorb hHsp90β was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL). The FiGR monoclonal IgG used to immunoadsorb the mouse GR was obtained from Dr. Jack Bodwell (Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH). The BuGR2 monoclonal IgG used to immunoblot the mouse GR was purchased from Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO). Immobilon-FL and PureProteome Nickel Magnetic Beads were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Billerica, MA). Rabbit anti-FLAG IgG was from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO). [1,2,4,6,7-3H] Dexamethasone (77 Ci/mmol) was from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA). The pSV2Wrec plasmid encoding full-length mouse GR was kindly provided by Dr. Edwin Sanchez (University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH). The FLAG-hHsp90α vector was received as a gift from Dr. Len Neckers (National Cancer Institute). pET151-dTOPO-Hsp90α and Hsp90β expression vectors (Southworth Lab, Ann Arbor, MI) were used as a template for site-directed mutagenesis. For the T5/7A hHsp90α construct, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using sense primer 5′-CTTCACCCCTGAGGAAGCCCAGGCCCAAGACCAACCGATG-3′ and antisense primer 5′-CATCGGTTGGTCTTGGGCCTGGGCTTCCTCAGGGGTGAAG-3′. For the T5/7D hHsp90α construct, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using sense primer 5′-CTTCACCCCTGAGGAAGACCAGGACCAAGACCAACCGATG-3′ and antisense primer 5′-CATCGGTTGGTCTTGGTCCTGGTCTTCCTCAGGGGTGAAG-3′.
Cell Culture.
HEK cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and 10% bovine calf serum. HEK cells were harvested into Hanks’ buffered saline solution. Cells were centrifuged and pellets were washed in Hanks’ buffered saline solution. Cells were then resuspended in HEM buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, and 20 mM sodium molybdate) and Dounce-homogenized, and cytosol was prepared as described previously (Kanelakis and Pratt, 2003). Mouse GR was expressed in Sf9 cells as described (Morishima et al., 2000).
Transient Transfection of Mouse GR.
HEK cells were grown as monolayers (162-cm2 culture flasks to ∼50% confluency), washed, and treated with 25 μg of plasmid DNA and 75 μl of TransFast transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI). After 1 hour, 10 ml of DMEM with 10% bovine calf serum was added, and the transfection was continued for 48 hours.
Immunoadsorption of GR and GR•Hsp90 Heterocomplex Assembly.
Receptors were immunoadsorbed from aliquots of 50 μl (for measuring steroid binding) or 100 μl (for Western blotting) of Sf9 cell cytosol as described (Morishima et al., 2000). For heterocomplex reconstitution with purified proteins, immunopellets containing GR stripped of chaperones were incubated with 20 μg of purified Hsp90, 15 μg of purified rabbit Hsp70, 0.6 μg of purified human Hop, 6 μg of purified human p23, 0.125 μg of purified yeast YDJ-1 adjusted to 55 μl with HKD buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol) containing 20 mM sodium molybdate and 5 μl of an ATP-regenerating system (50 mM ATP, 250 mM creatine phosphate, 20 mM magnesium acetate, and 100 IU/ml creatine phosphokinase). The assay mixtures were incubated for 20 minutes at 30°C with shaking and subsequently assayed for GR-associated Hsp90 and steroid-binding capacity as described (Morishima et al., 2000).
Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blotting.
Immune pellets were run on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-FL membranes. The membranes were probed with 1.0 μg/ml BuGR2 for GR, 0.4 μg/ml anti-Hsp90α IgG2a for hHsp90α, and 1.0 μg/ml anti-Hsp90β IgM for hHsp90β for 1 hour at room temperature. The immunoblots were then incubated a second time with IRDye 800CW-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), IRDye 800CW-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (γ2a chain specific), and IRDye 680LT-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM (μ-chain specific) for GR, hHsp90α, and hHsp90β, respectively, for 1 hour at room temperature. Washed membranes were scanned by Odyssey Fc Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) and the immunoreactivity was quantitated by Image Studio software within a linear dynamic range for each protein.
Protein Purification.
Hsp70, Hop, YDJ-1 (the yeast homolog of Hsp40), and p23 were purified as described by Kanelakis and Pratt (2003). DNAs encoding wild-type hHsp90α, T5/7A mutant hHsp90α, T5/7D mutant hHsp90α, and Hsp90β were cloned into the pET151 vector with a His6-tag and tobacco etch virus cleavage site (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein was purified as described by Southworth and Agard (2008) by nickel affinity (Ni-NTA Superflow; QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), ion exchange (HiTrap Q FF; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL), and size exclusion (Superdex 200 pg; GE Healthcare) chromatographies. Tobacco etch virus cleavage of the His6-tag was performed prior to the size exclusion column step. The mixture of rHsp90α and rHsp90β was purified from rabbit reticulocyte lysate as described by Kanelakis and Pratt (2003).
Results
Equivalence of Human Hsp90α and Hsp90β in GR•Hsp90 Heterocomplex Assembly.
To bind steroid with high affinity, the GR must be assembled into a heterocomplex with Hsp90 (Pratt and Toft, 2003). Figure 1a shows that incubation of an Hsp90-free immunopellet with a mixture of Hsp70, Hop, Hsp40, and p23 did not yield steroid-binding activity, whereas addition of purified human Hsp90α or human Hsp90β to the mix did yield steroid-binding activity. Human Hsp90α and Hsp90β yield equivalent GR steroid-binding activity that is similar to the mixture of Hsp90α and Hsp90β that we purify from rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Figure 1b shows the formation of GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes with three amounts of human Hsp90α and human Hsp90β. To obtain the data of Fig. 1, c and d, GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes were prepared as in Fig. 1b and split, with one half assayed by immunoblotting and scanned for the relative amount of Hsp90 bound to the GR (Fig. 1c) and the other half assayed for steroid-binding (Fig. 1d). Clearly, the relative amount of steroid bound reflects the relative amount of GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex formed, and hHsp90α and hHsp90β had equivalent chaperone activities in this assay.
Formation of Homodimers versus Heterodimer of Human Hsp90α and Hsp90β.
We determined that addition of a 1:1 mixture of hHsp90α and hHsp90β had the same ability to generate GR steroid-binding activity by the five-protein mix as the same amount of hHsp90α or hHsp90β alone (data not shown). We wanted then to know whether under our GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly conditions any Hsp90αβ heterodimers were formed. A great species difference in stability of Hsp90 dimers has been demonstrated. In the absence of ATP, yeast Hsp90 at low concentrations dissociated and could be found in a monomer-dimer equilibrium (Richter et al., 2008). In contrast to the rapid subunit exchange of yeast Hsp90, a lack of heterodimerization between hHsp90α and hHsp90β was reported by Minami et al. (1994), apparently because of a lack of dissociation of hHsp90α homodimers (Sreedhar et al., 2004). Under conditions of increased ionic strength and temperature, Richter et al. (2001) were able to achieve some subunit exchange to form hHsp90α•hHsp90β heterodimers. In the experiment of Fig. 2, His-tagged hHsp90β, which was as active as wild-type hHsp90β at GR activation by the five-protein system (data not shown), and an equal amount of purified hHsp90α were mixed under the buffer conditions we used for GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. The mixture was incubated at 30°C, and at various times, aliquots were adsorbed to a nickel matrix with all of the His-tagged Hsp90β recovered in the pellet. No Hsp90α was coprecipitated after 20 minutes (0.3 hours). We did detect a small amount (∼9%) of hHsp90α•His-Hsp90β heterodimer formation when the incubation was extended to 8 hours. A control sample containing purified hHsp90α and hHsp90β with no His-tagged hHsp90β was treated similarly to show the background level of hHsp90α in the pellet, which is at the level of the 0 time value for the His-tagged hHsp90β nickel adsorption. We concluded that heterodimers of hHsp90 do not form during our usual assay conditions (20 minutes at 30°C) but form very slowly during incubation of several hours. Thus, when we incubate with a 1:1 mix of hHsp90α and hHsp90β to assemble GR•hHsp90 heterocomplexes, we were forming only GR•hHsp90αα and GR•hHsp90ββ and no GR•hHsp90αβ complexes.
Expression of FLAG-hHsp90α in HEK Cells Suggests Homeostatic Regulation of hHsp90 and Only Trace αβ Heterodimer Formation.
Although hHsp90αβ heterodimers were not readily formed on mixing of purified proteins under our assay conditions (20 minutes, 30°C), it is possible that heterodimers can be formed in cells. To address this possibility, FLAG-tagged hHsp90α was expressed in HEK cells. As shown in Fig. 3a, as more FLAG-tagged hHsp90α was expressed, less endogenous hHsp90α and hHsp90β was present in the lysate. The decrease in endogenous hHsp90 when FLAG-hHsp90α was expressed suggests that the total amount of hHsp90 produced in the HEK cell was under homeostatic regulation. It is known from both cell-free (Zou et al., 1998) and cellular (Bharadwaj et al., 1999) studies that Hsp90 is a repressor of the heat shock transcription factor HSF1, but if that accounted for the phenomenon we observed here, we are surprised to see such a decrease in the constitutive isoform hHsp90β.
In Fig. 3b, lysate from FLAG-hHsp90α-expressing cells was immunoadsorbed with anti-FLAG and the immunopellet was blotted for both hHsp90α and hHsp90β. Only a small amount of hHsp90β was coimmunoprecipitated, suggesting relatively little αβ heterodimer formation, but surprisingly almost no endogenous HEK hHsp90α was in the pellet either. Thus, it appears that the FLAG-hHsp90α was dimerized almost totally with itself. Sullivan and Toft (1993) noted that newly synthesized in vitro translates of Hsp90 did not complex with endogenous Hsp90, and they suggested that Hsp90 monomers from a single polysome are separated by a short distance relative to monomers on separate polysomes and are thus more prone to interact to form homodimers. This may be the case in HEK cells, where we obtained an abundance of FLAG-hHsp90α•FLAG-hHsp90α dimers and only trace FLAG-hHsp90α•endogenous hHsp90α dimers. We should note that FLAG can dimerize with itself, and this could have contributed to the dimerization of FLAG-Hsp90α with itself.
Mouse GR Expressed in HEK Cells Is Associated with hHsp90αβ Heterodimers.
It seems as though some hHsp90αβ heterodimers are formed in HEK cells, and we wanted to determine if GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes formed in HEK cells contain hHsp90αβ heterodimers. To approach this question we used two immunoprecipitating antibodies specific for Hsp90α and Hsp90β, respectively. The specificity of immunoprecipitation is shown in Fig. 4a: Purified hHsp90α or purified hHsp90β was immunoprecipitated with nonimmune, anti-Hsp90α and anti-Hsp90β antibodies. Clearly, the immunoprecipitation was specific for the antibody targets. As shown in Fig. 4b, purified hHsp90α and hHsp90β were mixed and incubated 20 minutes at 30°C in our GR reconstitution assay buffer. The data confirmed our previous conclusion that no hHsp90αβ heterodimers were formed under our GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly conditions. For Fig. 4c, we expressed the mouse GR in human embryonic kidney cells and immunoadsorbed the GR•human Hsp90 heterocomplexes (First IP). The complexes were then released from the antibody beads by competition with a FiGR epitope peptide (Input), as we have previously reported (Murphy et al., 2003). The released complexes were then immunoprecipitated a second time with anti-Hsp90α or anti-Hsp90β, and all samples were immunoblotted for GR, Hsp90α, and Hsp90β. As expected from the work of Mendel and Ortí (1988), both Hsp90α and Hsp90β were present in the first immunoprecipitation with anti-GR antibody. Importantly, after release, the anti-Hsp90α and the Hsp90β immunoprecipitates contained the GR and both Hsp90α and Hsp90β. We conclude that HEK cells form GR•Hsp90αβ heterodimers, suggesting some exchange of human Hsp90α with human Hsp90β in the cell.
Phosphomimetic hHsp90α T5/7D Has the Same Chaperone Activity as Wild-Type hHsp90α.
The purified GR-activating machinery we used here can also be used to determine how modification of an Hsp90 isoform affects chaperone activity. Several laboratories have focused on a unique phosphorylation of Hsp90α at threonines 5 and 7 that occurs during DNA double-strand break repair (Lees-Miller and Anderson, 1989; Quanz et al., 2012; Solier et al., 2012; Elaimy et al., 2016). This Hsp90α T5/7 phosphorylation is carried out by the members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase family [ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK)], which serve as damage sensors that initiated a signaling cascade giving rise to DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, or cell death (Matsuoka et al., 2007; Ciccia and Elledge, 2010). Although it is clear that phosphorylation per se is important for DNA repair, it has not been determined whether phosphorylation of Hsp90α alters its chaperone activity.
To determine if threonine phosphorylation affects the chaperone activity of hHsp90α, we prepared two varieties of hHsp90α in which threonines 5 and 7 were converted to alanine or to aspartate, with the latter serving as a phosphomimetic hHsp90α. As shown in Fig. 5, both mutants of hHsp90α had the same ability to activate GR steroid-binding activity by the five-protein machinery as wild-type hHsp90α. The equivalence of wild-type and phosphomimetic hHsp90α in this assay suggests that T5/7 phosphorylation does not alter the intrinsic chaperone activity of hHsp90α.
Discussion
Hsp90β is expressed constitutively at a higher level than Hsp90α in most tissues, but Hsp90α is stress-inducible and present at higher levels during stress. This induction of Hsp90α will increase the α/β isoform ratio, and the change will be marked if there are differences in intrinsic chaperone activity between the two isoforms. When expressed as the only Hsp90 of yeast, the α and β isoforms of human Hsp90 differ with regard to their capacities for activation in a manner that is very client-protein–dependent (Millson et al., 2007). Because cycling with Hsp90 is required for high-affinity glucocorticoid-binding activity in cells, the five-protein system that we used here provides both a precise and physiologically meaningful assay of the intrinsic chaperone activity of the Hsp90 α and β isoforms.
It is quite clear that homodimers of hHsp90α have the same chaperone activity as homodimers of hHsp90β as measured by their ability to form GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes and to activate GR steroid-binding activity when they are present in the five-protein multichaperone machinery (Fig. 1). This strongly suggests an equivalence in their intrinsic physiologic chaperone activities. Although mixture of hHsp90α and hHsp90β does not readily allow exchange to yield αβ heterodimer formation, heterodimers can be forced by changing the incubation conditions (Richter et al., 2001) or by greatly increasing the incubation time under the conditions of our GR•Hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (Fig. 2). Thus, when we assembled GR•hHsp90 heterocomplexes with the five-protein machinery with both isoforms of human Hsp90 present, we were assembling predominantly GR•hHsp90αα and GR•hHsp90ββ complexes, with trace amounts, if any, of GR•hHsp90αβ complexes being formed.
The preference for homodimer formation also exists when FLAG-hHsp90α is expressed in HEK cells, where we find only very little dimer formation with either endogenous hHsp90α or hHsp90β. To us, the most reasonable explanation for this is that of Sullivan and Toft (1993) who suggested that Hsp90 monomers from a single polysome are separated by a short distance relative to monomers on separate polysomes and it is thus more probable that they will interact to form homodimers. The strong binding affinity between hHsp90αα and hHsp90ββ homodimer units makes subsequent exchange of subunits to form hHsp90α•hHsp90β heterodimers negligible when the purified proteins are mixed in vitro, but in the cell some heterodimers exist, and some GR•hHsp90 heterocomplexes formed in the cell are GR•hHsp90αβ complexes (Fig. 4c). There are probably also GR•hHsp90αα and GR•hHsp90ββ complexes formed in the cell as well. The difference between hHsp90αβ heterodimer formation in the cell and lack of heterodimer formation under our purified protein reconstitution assay conditions probably simply reflects the many hours at 37°C permitted for exchange in the cell. However, it is possible that post-translational modifications play a role in enabling the formation of hHsp90αβ heterodimers in the cell.
Hsp90 is one of the most abundant proteins in unstressed cells where it comprises 1–2% of cytosolic proteins. We have previously reported that overexpression of Hsp90 in HEK cells increases the level of Hsp90 only 2- to 3-fold, but that is sufficient to yield a profound stabilizing effect on client protein (neuronal nitric-oxide synthase) turnover (Peng et al., 2012). As we increased expression of FLAG-hHsp90α, we noted a decrease in the levels of endogenous hHsp90α and hHsp90β, suggesting that the total amount of Hsp90 is under homeostatic regulation (Fig. 3a). Although Hsp90 is an established repressor of HSF1 (Zou et al., 1998; Bharadwaj et al., 1999), the homeostatic regulation of Hsp90 we observed here involves both the stress-inducible hHsp90α and the constitutive Hsp90β, suggesting a different form of regulation. Hsp90 and Hsp70 have opposing effects on client protein turnover in HEK cells—Hsp90 inhibits substrate ubiquitination and degradation, whereas Hsp70 promotes ubiquitination and degradation (Peng et al., 2012). Thus, it may be important for general proteostasis that the cell maintain an appropriate ratio of these two naturally abundant components of the chaperone machinery, with homeostatic regulation of total Hsp90 expression being one component of that regulation.
The glucocorticoid receptor is possibly the most studied protein as an Hsp90 client, and to our knowledge, this study of the isoform composition of the GR•Hsp90 complex is unique among the hundreds of established Hsp90 client proteins. From our results, we would predict that GR•Hsp90 heterocomplexes produced in cells contain Hsp90αβ heterodimers as well as Hsp90αα and Hsp90ββ homodimers, although the exact ratio of the three forms is not known.
Because Hsp90α T5/7 phosphorylation occurs during DNA double-strand break repair, it has been assumed that the phosphorylation of Hsp90α must be in some way meaningful. However, the equivalence of wild-type hHsp90α and the phosphomimetic mutant T5/7D hHsp90α in their ability to activate GR steroid-binding activity strongly suggests that T5/7 phosphorylation does not alter the intrinsic chaperone activity of Hsp90α. Thus, at this time, it seems possible that T5/7 phosphorylation of Hsp90α is entirely fortuitous. Inasmuch as multiple components of repair foci have been shown to be Hsp90 clients (Pennisi et al., 2015), including DNA-PK (Solier et al., 2012), ATR (Ha et al., 2011) and ATM (Pennisi et al., 2017). The Hsp90α TQTQ motif clearly accommodates all of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases as a substrate for phosphorylation (Solier et al., 2012), and these clients may phosphorylate the Hsp90α chaperone because it is bound to them in a chaperone•client complex without any effect on Hsp90α chaperone activity.
Because cycling with Hsp90 plays a major role in proteostasis of a number of oncoproteins, there has been considerable interest in developing Hsp90 inhibitors as potential drugs for the treatment of cancers driven by Hsp90 clients, with one focus being development of isoform-specific inhibitors (Trepel et al., 2010). The requirement that Hsp90 functions only as a dimer (Wayne and Bolon, 2007) and the finding that a client protein can exist in complex with an Hsp90αβ heterodimer in which the inactivation of one member of the dimer would inactivate the complex may diminish the attractiveness of isoform-specific inhibitors.
Acknowledgments
We thank Yee Sun Tan for constructing the human Hsp90α T5/7A and T5/7D mutations.
Abbreviations
- ATM
ataxia telangiectasia mutated
- ATR
ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related
- GR
Glucocorticoid receptor
- HEK
human embryonic kidney
- Hop
Hsp organizer protein
- Hsp90
heat shock protein 90
Authorship Contributions
Participated in research design: Pratt, Nyati, Osawa.
Conducted experiments: Morishima, Yoshimura, Lau.
Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Mehta, Southworth, Nyati.
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Lawrence, Pratt, Osawa.
Footnotes
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health [Grant GM077430 to Y.O.], [Grant CA131290 to M.K.N.], [Grant CA097248 project IV to M.K.N.], and [Grants GM109896, GM110001A to D.R.S.]. This project is a component of the University of Michigan Medical School’s Protein Folding Disease Research Initiative.
References
- Bharadwaj S, Ali A, Ovsenek N. (1999) Multiple components of the HSP90 chaperone complex function in regulation of heat shock factor 1 in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 19:8033–8041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chadli A, Felts SJ, Toft DO. (2008) GCUNC45 is the first Hsp90 co-chaperone to show α/β isoform specificity. J Biol Chem 283:9509–9512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40:179–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elaimy AL, Ahsan A, Marsh K, Pratt WB, Ray D, Lawrence TS, Nyati MK. (2016) ATM is the primary kinase responsible for phosphorylation of Hsp90α after ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 7:82450–82457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grad I, Cederroth CR, Walicki J, Grey C, Barluenga S, Winssinger N, De Massy B, Nef S, Picard D. (2010) The molecular chaperone Hsp90α is required for meiotic progression of spermatocytes beyond pachytene in the mouse. PLoS One 5:e15770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ha K, Fiskus W, Rao R, Balusu R, Venkannagari S, Nalabothula NR, Bhalla KN. (2011) Hsp90 inhibitor-mediated disruption of chaperone association of ATR with hsp90 sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damage. Mol Cancer Ther 10:1194–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanelakis KC, Pratt WB. (2003) Regulation of glucocorticoid receptor ligand-binding activity by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Methods Enzymol 364:159–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirschke E, Goswami D, Southworth D, Griffin PR, Agard DA. (2014) Glucocorticoid receptor function regulated by coordinated action of the Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperone cycles. Cell 157:1685–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lees-Miller SP, Anderson CW. (1989) The human double-stranded DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylates the 90-kDa heat-shock protein, hsp90α at two NH2-terminal threonine residues. J Biol Chem 264:17275–17280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, III, Hurov KE, Luo J, Bakalarski CE, Zhao Z, Solimini N, Lerenthal Y, et al. (2007) ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316:1160–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mendel DB, Ortí E. (1988) Isoform composition and stoichiometry of the ∼90 kDa heat shock protein associated with glucocorticoid receptors. J Biol Chem 263:6695–6702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millson SH, Truman AW, Rácz A, Hu B, Panaretou B, Nuttall J, Mollapour M, Söti C, Piper PW. (2007) Expressed as the sole Hsp90 of yeast, the α and β isoforms of human Hsp90 differ with regard to their capacities for activation of certain client proteins, whereas only Hsp90β generates sensitivity to the Hsp90 inhibitor radicicol. FEBS J 274:4453–4463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minami Y, Kimura Y, Kawasaki H, Suzuki K, Yahara I. (1994) The carboxy-terminal region of mammalian HSP90 is required for its dimerization and function in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 14:1459–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morishima Y, Murphy PJM, Li D-P, Sanchez ER, Pratt WB. (2000) Stepwise assembly of a glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex resolves two sequential ATP-dependent events involving first hsp70 and then hsp90 in opening of the steroid binding pocket. J Biol Chem 275:18054–18060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy PJM, Morishima Y, Chen H, Galigniana MD, Mansfield JF, Simons SS Jr., Pratt WB. (2003) Visualization and mechanism of assembly of a glucocorticoid receptor•Hsp70 complex that is primed for subsequent Hsp90-dependent opening of the steroid binding cleft. J Biol Chem 278:34764–34773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng HM, Morishima Y, Pratt WB, Osawa Y. (2012) Modulation of heme/substrate binding cleft of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (nNOS) regulates binding of Hsp90 and Hsp70 proteins and nNOS ubiquitination. J Biol Chem 287:1556–1565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pennisi R, Antoccia A, Leone S, Ascenzi P, di Masi A. (2017) Hsp90α regulates ATM and NBN functions in sensing and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. FEBS J 284:2378–2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pennisi R, Ascenzi P, di Masi A. (2015) Hsp90: a new player in DNA repair? Biomolecules 5:2589–2618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pratt WB, Morishima Y, Osawa Y. (2008) The Hsp90 chaperone machinery regulates signaling by modulating ligand binding clefts. J Biol Chem 283:22885–22889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pratt WB, Toft DO. (2003) Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 228:111–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quanz M, Herbette A, Sayarath M, de Koning L, Dubois T, Sun JS, Dutreix M. (2012) Heat shock protein 90α (Hsp90α) is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and accumulates in repair foci. J Biol Chem 287:8803–8815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richter K, Muschler P, Hainzl O, Buchner J. (2001) Coordinated ATP hydrolysis by the Hsp90 dimer. J Biol Chem 276:33689–33696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richter K, Soroka J, Skalniak L, Leskovar A, Hessling M, Reinstein J, Buchner J. (2008) Conserved conformational changes in the ATPase cycle of human Hsp90. J Biol Chem 283:17757–17765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solier S, Kohn KW, Scroggins B, Xu W, Trepel J, Neckers L, Pommier Y. (2012) Heat shock protein 90α (HSP90α), a substrate and chaperone of DNA-PK necessary for the apoptotic response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:12866–12872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southworth DR, Agard DA. (2008) Species-dependent ensembles of conserved conformational states define the Hsp90 chaperone ATPase cycle. Mol Cell 32:631–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southworth DR, Agard DA. (2011) Client-loading conformation of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone revealed in the cryo-EM structure of the human Hsp90:Hop complex. Mol Cell 42:771–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sreedhar AS, Kalmár E, Csermely P, Shen YF. (2004) Hsp90 isoforms: functions, expression and clinical importance. FEBS Lett 562:11–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan WP, Toft DO. (1993) Mutational analysis of hsp90 binding to the progesterone receptor. J Biol Chem 268:20373–20379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S. (2010) HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:515–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G, Neckers L. (2010) Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10:537–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss AK, Thomas T, Gruss P. (2000) Mice lacking HSP90beta fail to develop a placental labyrinth. Development 127:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wayne N, Bolon DN. (2007) Dimerization of Hsp90 is required for in vivo function. Design and analysis of monomers and dimers. J Biol Chem 282:35386–35395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou J, Guo Y, Guettouche T, Smith DF, Voellmy R. (1998) Repression of heat shock transcription factor HSF1 activation by HSP90 (HSP90 complex) that forms a stress-sensitive complex with HSF1. Cell 94:471–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]