Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2018 Jun 11;8(14):6972–6987. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4214

The first complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Nanorana parkeri and Nanorana ventripunctata (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae), with related phylogenetic analyses

Lichun Jiang 1,2, Zhangqiang You 1, Peng Yu 2, Qiping Ruan 2,✉, Wei Chen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6065340  PMID: 30073060

Abstract

Members of the Nanorana genus (family Dicroglossidae) are often referred to as excellent model species with which to study amphibian adaptations to extreme environments and also as excellent keystone taxa for providing insights into the evolution of the Dicroglossidae. However, a complete mitochondrial genome is currently only available for Nanorana pleskei. Thus, we analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes of Nanorana parkeri and Nanorana ventripunctata to investigate their evolutionary relationships within Nanorana and their phylogenetic position in the family Dicroglossidae. Our results showed that the genomes of N. parkeri (17,837 bp) and N. ventripunctata (18,373 bp) encode 13 protein‐coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA genes, 23 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and a noncoding control region. Overall sequences and genome structure of the two species showed high degree of similarity with N. pleskei, although the motif structures and repeat sequences of the putative control region showed clear differences among these three Nanorana species. In addition, a tandem repeat of the tRNA‐Met gene was found located between the tRNA‐Gln and ND2 genes. On both the 5′ and 3′‐sides, the control region possessed distinct repeat regions; however, the CSB‐2 motif was not found in N. pleskei. Based on the nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs, our phylogenetic analyses, using Bayesian inference and maximum‐likelihood methods, illustrate the taxonomic status of Nanorana with robust support showing that N. ventripunctata and N. pleskei are more closely related than they are to N. parkeri. In conclusion, our analyses provide a more robust and reliable perspective on the evolutionary history of Dicroglossidae than earlier analyses, which used only a single species (N. pleskei).

Keywords: control region, mitochondrial genome, Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana pleskei, Nanorana ventripunctata, phylogenetic analyses

1. INTRODUCTION

The Nanorana (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) are a genus of dicroglossid frogs found over much of Asia including Pakistan, India, Nepal, China, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Vietnam (Frost, 2018). The Nanorana genus comprises about 28 species (Frost, 2018), including three species (Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana ventripunctata, and Nanorana pleskei) that are endemic to the Tibetan Plateau in China (Che et al., 2010; Chen, Liu, Jiang, Xie, & Zheng, 2005; Fei, Hu, Ye, & Huang, 2009; Fei, Ye, Huang, Jiang, & Xie, 2005; Fei et al., 2004; Lu & Yang, 2004; Wang, Annemarie, Muhammad, & Xie, 2004). Nanorana parkeri is known from southern and eastern Xizang, China, and the Tibetan Plateau of Nepal at elevations of 2,850–5,000 m asl. It has recently been reported from Kashmir in northern India, but the distribution within this region needs further confirmation. Nanorana ventripunctata is endemic to northwestern Yunnan province in China, ranging in elevation from 3,120 to 4,100 m asl, while Nanorana pleskei is known from Qinghai, Gansu, and Sichuan provinces in China, at elevations of 3,300–4,500 m asl (Fei et al., 2004). Similar to most anurans, Nanorana species have a terrestrial adult life history. However, due to their high‐elevation habitats, Nanorana species experience extremely harsh abiotic factors, including hypoxia, high UV radiation, and dramatic temperature changes on a daily basis. Consequently, Nanorana is an excellent model species for studying the adaptations of frogs to extreme environmental conditions (Sun et al., 2015). Does the unique high‐elevation environment of Nanorana have a greater impact on species differentiation and gene sequences characteristics? Our study aimed to clarify the mitochondrial genome sequence characteristics and phylogenetic relationship and the taxonomic status of the three species in the genus Nanorana.

The phylogenetic relationships of Nanorana have been studied previously (Che et al., 2009; Chen, Wang, Liu, Xie, & Jiang, 2011; Lu, 1995; Zhou et al., 2014); however, debates on the taxonomic status of the three species that are the focus of this study are still ongoing. The taxonomy of Nanorana species is not yet fully settled because of numerous changes during the last decade. Previous phylogenetic analyses support N. pleskei and Quasipaa spinosa as having a close relationship (Chen et al., 2011), as well as N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri (N. pleskei + (N. parkeri + N. ventripunctata)) (Lu, 1995). In other literature, however, N. pleskei and N. ventripunctata are reported to have a closer relationship (N. parkeri + (N. pleskei + N. ventripunctata)) (Che et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2014), while Pyron and Wiens (2011) thought that N. pleskei and N. parkeri had a closer evolutionary relationship (N. ventripunctata + (N. pleskei + N. parkeri)). Thus, complete sequencing of the mtDNA in Nanorana can help clarify the phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity within the genus. With that information, we can then better understand the phylogenetic status and intraspecific relationships among the three species within this group (Che et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2011; Jiang & Zhou, 2001, 2005; Jiang et al., 2005; Roelants, Jiang, & Bossuyt, 2004).

Mitochondrial genomes have been widely used as molecular markers in phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies of amphibians because of their high mutation and substitution rates, rare gene recombination, maternal transmission pathway, high copy number, and easy accessibility (Bossuyt, Brown, Hillis, Cannatella, & Milinkovitch, 2006; Howlader, Nair, Gopalan, & Merilä, 2015; Jiang et al., 2005; Matsui et al., 2011; de Sá et al., 2012). Moreover, complete mitochondrial genomes are effectively used as molecular markers in studies of population genetics and conservation biology (Ren et al., 2009; Sahoo et al., 2015; San Mauro, Gower, Oommen, Wilkinson, & Zardoya, 2004; Sano, Kurabayashi, Fujii, Yonekawa, & Sumidam, 2004; Yong, Song, Lim, Eamsobhana, & Tan, 2016). For example, complete mitochondrial genomes have been used to elucidate many evolutionary questions regarding amphibians (Liu, Wang, & Bing, 2005; Yuan, Xia, Zheng, & Zeng, 2016; Zhang, Nie, Wang, & Hu, 2009), as well as to investigate the evolutionary relationships of endangered species, such as Odorrana ishikawae, Mantella madagascariensis, Andrias davidianus, and Paa spinosa (Kurabayashi et al., 2006, 2010; Zhang, Chen, Liu, Zhou, & Qu, 2003; Zhou, Zhang, Zheng, Yu, & Yang, 2009).

Mitochondrial genes such as the COX I, Cytochrome b (Cytb), D‐loop, tRNA, and NADH have been used for previous phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies on the genetic divergence of Nanorana (Che et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2014). Here, we use complete mitochondrial genomes to analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the three Nanorana species (N. parkeri, N. ventripunctata, and N. pleskei) and other related species. Moreover, in order to reconstruct a robust evolutionary relationship among the three species, we need additional mitochondrial genomic information from Nanorana species. Therefore, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genome of N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata and summarized the structural variations of 40 mitochondrial genome sequences in the Family Dicroglossidae. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of Dicroglossidae using the concatenated sequences of 13 protein‐coding genes from Dicroglossidae mitochondrial genomes, based on which the evolutionary characteristics of the mitochondrial genomes in Dicroglossidae were evaluated. Furthermore, we analyzed the mitochondrial genomic sequence and phylogenetic relationships within N. pleskei, N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri to assess the evolutionary status of the three species within the Nanorana genus. Additionally, the complete mitochondrial genomes of two Nanorana species (N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri) were analyzed to find novel data with which to investigate the placement of the three Nanorana species in the phylogenetic tree of Dicroglossidae and to provide molecular data for further study on the taxonomic status and adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of these high‐altitude species.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Sampling and DNA extraction

The Xizang Plateau frog (N. parkeri, Figure 1) was sampled from Dangxiong County (4,300 m asl), the Tibet Autonomous Region, China, in September 2015. The Yunnan slow frog (N. ventripunctata) was sampled from Xianggelila County (4,200 m asl), Yunnan province, China, in July 2016. All collections were initially preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at −70°C until DNA extraction was performed. According to the protocol adopted by Zhang, Chao, Lai, Li, and Zhao (2000) and Xia, Liu, and Lu (2002), total mtDNA of two Nanorana species was extracted from skin tissue for the following PCR amplification.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The sample of Nanorana parkeri collected in the field. Photographs by XiaoYan Ma

2.2. Mitochondrial DNA amplification and sequencing

The entire mitochondrial genome was amplified in twelve overlapping segments by PCR with LA‐Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, China), using 20 ng of total genomic DNA from the sample as a template. Complete mtDNA was amplified as concatenated sequences by adopting selectively amplified mtDNA templates and 10 primer pairs, as published by Kurabayashi and Sumida (2009). Partial PCR primers were also designed based on the alignments of the relatively conserved regions of congeneric N. pleskei (NC_016119) and N. taihangnica (NC_024272). The PCR amplification was performed as follows: 2.5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 0.5 min at 94°C, 0.5 min at 50–59°C, 3–5 min at 60°C, and a 9 min final extension at 72°C. PCR reactants were loaded on 0.8%–1.0% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under ultraviolet light. PCR products were purified with Gel Extract Purification Kits (V‐gene) and automated sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer, either directly or following subcloning into the pMD18‐T vector (TaKaRa, China). To ensure maximum accuracy, each amplification product was sequenced twice independently, followed by a third PCR amplification.

2.3. Sequence assembly and analysis

Sequences were assembled manually and aligned, and each gene was then translated into an amino acid sequence using MEGA 6.0 (Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski, & Kumar, 2013). The amino acid sequence alignments of each of the protein‐coding genes (PCGs) were generated using the computer program Clustal X 1.83 (Thompson, Gibson, Plewniak, Jeanmougin, & Higgins, 1997). Based on sequence similarity results from BLAST searches, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes were recognized, and tRNA genes were identified using tRNAscan‐SE 1.21 (Schattner, Brooks, & Lowe, 2005). Base composition and codon usage were analyzed in MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013). The mitochondrial genome sequences have been submitted to NCBI GenBank with the accession number NC_026789 (N. parkeri) and KY594708 (N. ventripunctata). Features of the base composition of nucleotide sequences were detected using the AT‐skew and GC‐skew in the mitochondrial genome. We then calculated the AT‐skew and GC‐skew using the following formulae from Perna and Kocher (1995): AT‐skew = (A − T)/(A + T) and GC‐skew = (G − C)/(G + C).

2.4. Phylogenetic analysis

Combined with 38 other Dicroglossidae mitochondrial genomes from NCBI GenBank (Supporting information Table S1), the mitochondrial genomes of N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata were analyzed using the phylogenetic tree method, with the concatenated sequences of the 13 protein‐coding genes and the two species Babina subaspera (NC_022871) and Hylarana guentheri (NC_024748) as outgroups. First, we aligned the 13 mitochondrial protein‐coding gene sequences in Clustal X 1.83 (Schattner et al., 2005) with the default settings, and then we concatenated individual genes excluding the stop codon. We selected the optimal nucleotide substitution model in jModeltest v0.1.1 (Posada, 2008) and used the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC: Posada & Buckley, 2004).

Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) were used for phylogenetic analyses in MrBayes 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al., 2012), and BI of nucleotide acid datasets was performed using the GTR + I + G model (Lanave, Preparata, Saccone, & Serio, 1984). A ML tree was constructed using RAxML, and the robustness of the phylogenetic results was tested through bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates (Stamatakis, 2014).

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Genome content and organization

The mitochondrial genomes of N. parkeri (17,837 bp), N. ventripunctata (18,373 bp) and N. pleskei (17,660 bp) included 13 PCGs (ND1‐6, ND4L, COX1‐3, Cyt b, ATP6 and ATP8), two ribosomal RNA genes (12S and 16S rRNA), 23 tRNA genes and one large noncoding region (putative control region; CR) (Table 1; Figure 2). In the three genomes, 12 protein‐coding genes (ND1‐5, ND4L, COX1‐3, ATP8, ATP6, and Cyt b) and two rRNAs (12S and 16S rRNA) were encoded on the heavy (H) strand along with 15 tRNAs (tRNA‐Leu1, tRNA‐Thr, tRNA‐Phe, tRNA‐Val, tRNA‐Leu2, tRNA‐Ile, tRNA‐Met1, tRNA‐Met2, tRNA‐Trp, tRNA‐Asp, tRNA‐Lys, tRNA‐Gly, tRNA‐Arg, tRNA‐His, and tRNA‐Ser2) and CR, while the remaining one protein‐coding gene (ND6) and eight tRNAs (tRNA‐Pro, tRNA‐Gln, tRNA‐Ala, tRNA‐Asn, tRNA‐Cys, tRNA‐Tyr, tRNA‐Ser1, and tRNA‐Glu) were encoded on the light (L) strand (Table 1; Figure 2). Overall we found that there were no differences in the gene arrangement of mitochondrial genomes among these Nanorana and Quasipaa species (Chen, Zhai, Zhu, & Chen, 2015; Simon et al., 1994; Zhou et al., 2009), but there were some differences between these two frog species and the typical neobatrachian type (e.g., Rana nigromaculata) in the position of tRNA‐Met, with formation of a tandem duplication of tRNA‐Met gene between tRNA‐Gln and ND2.

Table 1.

The mitochondrial genome profile of three Nanorana species (Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana ventripunctata, and Nanorana pleskei)

Gene Stranda Nanorana parkeri (17,837 bp) Nanorana ventripunctata (18,373 bp) Nanorana pleskei (17,660 bp)
Position Size Codon Intergenic bpb Position Size Codon Intergenic bpb Position Size Codon Intergenic bpb
From To Start Stopc From To Start Stopc From To Start Stopc
tRNA‐Leu1 H 1 72 72 −3 1 72 72 0 1 81 81 −9
tRNA‐Thr H 70 142 73 0 73 142 70 0 73 140 68 0
tRNA‐Pro L 143 211 69 −1 143 211 69 −1 141 209 69 −1
tRNA‐Phe H 211 280 70 0 211 280 70 0 209 278 70 0
12S RNA H 281 1,216 936 0 281 1,217 937 0 279 1,212 934 0
tRNA‐Val H 1,217 1,286 67 0 1,218 1,287 70 0 1,213 1,282 70 0
16S RNA H 1,287 2,873 1,587 0 1,288 2,880 1,593 0 1,283 2,873 1,591 0
tRNA‐Leu2 H 2,874 2,946 73 0 2,881 2,953 73 0 2,874 2,946 73 0
ND1 H 2,947 3,904 958 GTG T– 0 2,954 3,911 958 GTG T– 0 2,947 3,904 958 GTG T– 0
tRNA‐Ile H 3,905 3,975 71 0 3,912 3,982 71 0 3,905 3,975 71 −1
tRNA‐Gln L 3,976 4,046 71 0 3,983 4,053 71 0 3,975 4,045 71 0
tRNA‐Met1 H 4,047 4,115 69 10 4,054 4,122 69 9 4,046 4,114 69 9
tRNA‐Met2 H 4,126 4,194 69 0 4,132 4,200 69 0 4,124 4,192 69 0
ND2 H 4,195 5,227 1,033 ATT T– 0 4,201 5,233 1,033 ATT T– 0 4,193 5,225 1,033 ATT T– 0
tRNA‐Trp H 5,228 5,297 70 0 5,234 5,303 70 0 5,226 5,295 70 0
tRNA‐Ala L 5,298 5,367 70 2 5,304 5,373 70 2 5,296 5,365 70 2
tRNA‐Asn L 5,370 5,442 73 0 5,376 5,448 73 0 5,368 5,440 73 0
rep_origin
L‐strand L 5,443 5,471 29 0 5,449 5,477 29 0 5,441 5,470 30 0
tRNA‐Cys L 5,472 5,536 65 0 5,478 5,542 65 0 5,471 5,536 66 0
tRNA‐Tyr L 5,537 5,603 67 4 5,543 5,609 67 4 5,537 5,603 67 4
COXI H 5,608 7,158 1,551 ATA AGG −9 5,614 7,164 1,551 ATA AGG −9 5,608 7,158 1,551 ATA AGG −9
tRNA‐Ser1 L 7,150 7,220 71 0 7,156 7,226 71 0 7,150 7,220 71 0
tRNA‐Asp H 7,221 7,289 69 1 7,227 7,296 70 2 7,221 7,289 69 2
COXII H 7,291 7,975 685 ATG T– 0 7,299 7,983 685 ATG T– 0 7,292 7,976 685 ATG T– 0
tRNA‐Lys H 7,976 8,045 70 3 7,984 8,053 70 1 7,977 8,046 70 2
ATP8 H 8,049 8,210 162 ATG TAA −7 8,055 8,216 162 ATG TAA −7 8,049 8,210 162 ATG TAA −7
ATP6 H 8,204 8,885 682 ATG T– 0 8,210 8,891 682 ATG T– 0 8,204 8,885 682 ATG T– 0
COXIII H 8,886 9,669 784 ATG T– 0 8,892 9,675 784 ATG T– 0 8,886 9,669 784 ATG T– 0
tRNA‐Gly H 9,670 9,738 69 0 9,676 9,744 69 0 9,670 9,738 69 0
ND3 H 9,739 10,096 358 GTG T– 0 9,745 10,102 385 GTG T– 0 9,739 10,096 358 GTG T– 0
tRNA‐Arg H 10,097 10,165 69 1 10,103 10,171 69 1 10,097 10,165 69 1
ND4L H 10,167 10,451 285 ATG TAA −7 10,173 10,457 285 ATG TAA −7 10,167 10,451 285 ATG TAA −7
ND4 H 10,445 11,807 1,363 ATG T– 0 10,451 11,813 1,363 ATG T– 0 10,445 11,807 1,363 ATG T– 0
tRNA‐His H 11,808 11,875 68 0 11,814 11,813 69 0 11,808 11,876 69 0
tRNA‐Ser2 H 11,876 11,943 68 106 11,883 11,950 68 37 11,877 11,944 68 44
ND5 H 12,050 13,873 1824 ATG TAA −15 11,988 13,811 1824 ATG TAA −15 11,989 13,812 1824 ATG TAA −15
ND6 L 13,859 14,356 498 ATG AGA 0 13,797 14,294 498 ATG AGA 0 13,798 14,295 498 ATG AGA 0
tRNA‐Glu L 14,357 14,425 69 7 14,295 14,363 69 7 14,296 14,364 69 7
CYTB H 14,433 15,578 1,146 ATG TAG 0 14,371 15,516 1,146 ATG TAG 0 14,372 15,517 1,146 ATG TAG 0
Control region H 15,579 17,837 2,259 1 15,517 18,373 2,857 0 15,518 17,660 2,143 0
Open in a new tab

Note.aH and L indicate genes transcribed on the heavy and light strands, respectively. bNumbers correspond to the nucleotides separating adjacent genes, negative numbers indicate overlapping nucleotides. cT represents incomplete stop codons.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Complete mitochondrial genome organization and gene arrangement of Nanorana ventripunctata and Nanorana pleskei. Genes coded on the H strand are directed to the outer ring, while the genes coded on the L‐strand are indicated in the interior of the ring. Genes are abbreviated as follows: ATP6 and ATP8 (subunits 6 and 8 of ATPase), COXI‐COXIII (cytochrome c oxidase subunits 1–3), Cytb (cytochrome b), ND1‐ND6 and ND4L (NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1–6 and 4L), 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA of 12S and 16S), CR (control region; noncoding region). One‐letter amino acid abbreviations were used to label the corresponding tRNA genes

The gene components were very loosely juxtaposed with 134/42 (N. parkeri) and 63/39 (N. ventripunctata) of gap/overlapping nucleotides, compared to that of N. pleskei (71/49; Table 1) (Simon et al., 1994). Although the overall A + T contents of 57.87% in N. parkeri and 59.1% in N. ventripunctata were relatively higher than that of N. pleskei (57.5%), those values are within the range (52.8%–62.74%) of Dicroglossidae (Supporting information Table S1). The nucleotide skew was highly similar among these mitochondrial genomes including that of N. pleskei, with only some exceptions found on COX2, ATP6, ATP8 and the putative control region (Table 2).

Table 2.

AT/CG skews in the mitochondrial protein‐coding genes (PCGs), 2 rRNA genes, CR and the entire mitochondrial genome from three Nanorana species (Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana ventripunctata, and Nanorana pleskei). The bold values indicated significant differences between the 3 species

Gene AT‐skew CG‐skew
N. parkeri N. ventripunctata N. pleskei N. parkeri N. ventripunctata N. pleskei
ND1 −0.130 −0.141 −0.131 −0.356 −0.305 −0.305
ND2 −0.042 −0.072 −0.069 −0.510 −0.407 −0.404
ND3 −0.316 −0.212 −0.264 −0.309 −0.370 −0.287
ND4 −0.122 −0.119 −0.139 −0.362 −0.354 −0.336
ND4L −0.124 −0.148 −0.157 −0.362 −0.328 −0.308
ND5 −0.091 −0.070 −0.097 −0.266 −0.289 −0.261
ND6 −0.261 −0.289 −0.300 0.453 0.490 0.453
COX1 −0.136 −0.114 −0.118 −0.160 −0.181 −0.160
COX2 −0.005 0.028 −0.022 −0.223 −0.236 −0.175
COX3 −0.127 −0.148 −0.187 −0.256 −0.240 −0.225
ATP6 0.262 −0.137 −0.137 −0.455 −0.410 −0.424
ATP8 0.056 0.050 0.000 −0.481 −0.508 −0.448
Cytb −0.060 −0.088 −0.110 −0.339 −0.316 −0.297
12S rRNA 0.138 0.108 0.145 −0.111 −0.131 −0.119
16S rRNA 0.144 0.136 0.145 −0.101 −0.091 −0.096
CR −0.104 −0.216 −0.050 −0.208 −0.219 −0.155
13PCG −0.107 −0.110 −0.120 −0.277 −0.270 −0.248
Overall −0.042 −0.066 −0.043 −0.261 −0.259 −0.155
Open in a new tab

3.2. Protein‐coding genes (PCGs) and codon usage patterns

The inferred start/stop codons for protein‐coding genes of N. parkeri, N. ventripunctata, and N. pleskei are listed in Table 1. In three mitochondrial genomes, the protein‐coding genes were initiated by ATG, with the exceptions of COX1, ND1, ND2, and ND3 (Table 1). The open reading frame of ND1 and ND3 started with GTG, while that of COX1 and ND2 started with ATA and ATT, respectively. The canonical stop codon (TAA or TAG) can be found in four protein‐coding genes (ATP8, Cytb, ND4L, and ND5; Table 1), while COX1 and ND6 use AGG and AGA as the termination codon, respectively. The remaining seven (ATP6, COX2‐3, and ND1‐4) had incomplete T‐stop codons (Table 1), completed (TAA) by polyadenylation after transcription (Boore, 2001).

The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of the three species of Nanorana mitogenomes are shown in Table 3, Supporting information Tables S2–S4. The results demonstrate that synonymous codon usage has a distinct bias toward A or T for 13 PCGs. The codons AUU (5.03%–5.62%), UUU (3.92%–4.37%), GCC (3.84%–4.03%), and CUU (3.63%–3.79%) were the four most frequently used codons in the mitogenomes of our three species of Nanorana, accounting for 16.42%–17.81%. In addition to GCC codon, these codons were mainly composed of A or U nucleotides, indicating the highly biased usage of A and T nucleotides in the three species of Nanorana PCGs. Meanwhile, the most frequently represented amino acids in the three species of Nanorana mitochondrial proteins were Leu (16.27%–16.38%), Ala (8.24%–8.32%), Ile (7.95%–8.11%), and Phe (6.62%–6.78%), accounting for 39.08%–39.59%. The least frequently represented amino acid was Cys (0.74%–0.77%). Codon usage of PCGs showed a major bias of A + T content, which played a major role in the A + T bias of the entire mitogenome. Similar patterns with a strong T‐ or A‐bias in the wobble position have been found among other Nanorana species also. The RSCU analysis showed that codons with A or T (U) at the third position are mostly overused compared with other synonymous codons. Therefore, the codon usage can reveal nucleotide bias too. These data imply a high A + T content in the three Nanorana species. The bias toward the use of Ts over As, to the 13 PCGs, is more obvious in these three Nanorana mitogenomes with −0.080 to −0.100 AT skewness. Moreover, negative AT‐skew and GC‐skew were found in the third position, whereas both the first and second positions showed positive AT‐skew and negative GC‐skew in N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata. In contrast, the first, second and third positions showed negative AT‐skew and GC‐skew in N. pleskei (Supporting information Table S5).

Table 3.

Codon usage pattern of the 13 mitochondrial protein‐coding genes from three Nanorana species (Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana ventripunctata, and Nanorana pleskei. The asterisks “*” indicate terminate codon.)

Amino acids Codon No. Amino acids Codon No. Amino acids Codon No.
Npar Nven Nple Npar Nven Nple Npar Nven Nple
Phe UUU 156 148 165 CCA 58 61 62 AAG 15 18 23
UUC 103 102 91 CCG 25 18 19 Asp GAU 30 31 33
Leu UUA 118 123 117 Thr ACU 80 73 86 GAC 44 40 37
UUG 26 30 44 ACC 97 95 82 Glu GAA 61 57 62
CUU 143 142 137 ACA 109 100 112 GAG 29 32 29
CUC 137 134 130 ACG 13 18 8 Cys UGU 11 17 15
CUA 140 128 132 Ala GCU 72 69 78 UGC 18 12 13
CUG 50 58 58 GCC 152 148 145 Trp UGA 84 88 86
Ile AUU 190 204 212 GCA 69 69 73 UGG 25 22 25
AUC 112 102 88 GCG 19 25 18 Arg CGU 14 11 12
Met AUA 121 125 119 Tyr UAU 63 61 60 CGC 18 23 20
AUG 58 60 62 UAC 43 47 50 CGA 35 33 31
Val GUU 71 71 84 UAA* 3 3 3 CGG 7 10 10
GUC 43 52 47 UAG* 1 1 1 Ser AGU 25 23 25
GUA 59 66 73 His CAU 34 28 34 AGC 30 33 29
GUG 38 24 21 CAC 67 73 67 AGA* 1 1 1
Ser UCU 62 67 71 Gln CAA 75 78 77 AGG* 1 1 1
UCC 79 72 68 CAG 18 13 14 Gly GGU 36 42 47
UCA 70 78 78 Asn AAU 63 69 63 GGC 74 69 61
UCG 16 7 9 AAC 62 49 54 GGA 50 52 48
Pro CCU 33 34 40 Lys AAA 69 73 64 GGG 58 63 67
CCC 91 98 83
Open in a new tab

3.3. Transfer and ribosomal RNA genes

A total of 23 tRNA genes (including an extra copy of tRNA‐Met gene) with 65 to 73 bp in length were identified in mitochondrial genomes of both N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata (Figure 3), including an extra copy of the tRNA‐Met genes. All tRNA genes can fold into the canonical cloverleaf secondary structure with the same anticodon usage as reported in other vertebrates. The sequences, anticodon nucleotides, and secondary structures of tRNA genes in N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata were very similar to those in N. pleskei (Chen et al., 2011) (Figure 3). In addition, a tandem repeat of tRNA‐Met gene was easy to find in the three Nanorana species, located between the tRNA‐Gln and ND2 genes. Extra tRNA‐Met was also found in Quasipaa boulengeri, Fejervarya cancrivora, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, Euphlyctis hexadactylus, Limnonectes bannaensis, and Occidozyga martensii (Alam et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2011; Li et al., 2014a, 2014b; Ren et al., 2009; Shan, Xia, Zheng, Zou, & Zeng, 2014; Zhang et al., 2009). But this phenomenon is different to that seen in Amolops tormotus and other typical vertebrates (Su, Wu, Yan, Cao, & Hu, 2007). Two tRNA‐Met genes in each lineage may come from different origins (Kurabayashi et al., 2006), and the tandem duplication of the tRNA‐Met gene can be seen as a synapomorphic feature of Dicroglossidae. A tandem duplication of the mitochondrial tRNA‐Pro and tRNA‐Thr genes in Bipes biporus has been reported from previous research (Macey, Schulte, Larson, & Papenfuss, 1998). Based on tandem duplication/deletion models, pseudogene formation in tandemly duplicated sequences might result from mtDNA rearrangement. Our results found two tandem tRNA‐Met genes in N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata which supports this view.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Putative tRNA secondary structures predicted from the 22 tRNA gene sequences found in the (a) Nanorana parkeri and (b) Nanorana ventripunctata mitochondrial genome

12S and 16S rRNAs were encoded on the H strand and were separated by tRNA‐Val in both of the mitochondrial genomes that we analyzed. The length of 12S and 16S rRNA genes was estimated to be 936 and 1,587 bp for N. parkeri, and 937 and 1,593 bp for N. ventripunctata, respectively.

3.4. Noncoding regions

Putative control region, of 2,259 bp (N. parkeri) and 2,857 bp (N. ventripunctata) were found in Cytb and tRNA‐Leu, which is longer than that of N. pleskei (2,143 bp) (Table 1). The size of control region variation demonstrated different lengths of the total mitogenomes for the three species. The A + T contents (65.96% in N. parkeri and 69.86% in N. ventripunctata) in control region were higher than in other regions (Table 1). Additionally, the A + T contents rated different lengths of the total mitogenomes for the three species. The A + T content in this region is higher than that in the coding regions (Boore, 1999; Simon et al., 1994). The L‐strand origin of replication (OL) of the N. parkeri and N. ventripunctata mitogenome is located at the gene boundary of tRNA‐Asn and tRNA‐Cys in the WANCY tRNA gene cluster and has the same sequence as N. pleskei (Chen et al., 2011). The sequence, structure, and position of OL are well conserved in the anuran mitogenomes, and are also similar to those in other vertebrates (San Mauro, Gower, Zardoya, & Wilkinson, 2006), implying it is a common and important characteristic of this short intergenic spacer region.

On both 5′ and 3′‐sides, the control region has distinct repeat regions (Figure 4) with the 5′‐side repeat region consisting of 6.5 and 4.6 tandem repeat units of 124 bp in N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri, respectively. Dissimilar to the 5′‐side repeat region, the 3′‐side repeat region includes 10.8 tandem repeat units of 11 bp (5′‐GCTCGTATTCT‐3′), 10.9 tandem repeat units of 11 bp (5′‐CTTCGCTTATC‐3′), 29.6 tandem repeat units of 10 bp (5′‐GTTTTTGTTA‐3′), 8.7 tandem repeat units of 11 bp (5′‐GCTCGTATATT‐3′), 8.9 tandem repeat units of 11 bp (5′‐ATACTTCGCTT‐3′), 16.3 tandem repeat units of 8 bp (5′‐TAATTGTA‐3′), 12.8 tandem repeat units of 8 bp (5′‐GCTGATCG‐3′), respectively (Table 4). No tandem repeats in the 3′‐side region were found in N. pleskei which is unusual for a mitogenome control region. Unlike the corresponding region in other anurans, the control region of N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri included TAS, CSB‐1, CSB‐2, CSB‐3, and OH (Figure 5). The 5′‐side tandem repeat units included 6.5 and 4.6 putative termination‐associated sequences (TASs, 5′‐TATAAGACATCTAT GTA‐3′) of N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri, respectively (Table 4). Tandem repeat units including TASs were also detected in the control regions of Bufo japonicas, Paa spinosa and Hyla japonica (Igawa, Kurabayashi, Usuki, Fujii, & Sumida, 2008; Zhou et al., 2009). Three conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) may be related to in the initiation of the mtDNA synthesis and they (CSB‐1, CSB‐2, CSB‐3) can be identified between the tandem repeat units at the 5′ and 3′‐sides (Table 4; Figure 4). CSB‐1, CSB‐2 and CSB‐3 of N. ventripunctata and N. parkeri showed high similarity to the consensus in other amphibians, while the variation in N. pleskei is slightly larger (Figure 5); moreover, CSB‐1 is not reduced to a truncated penta motif (5′‐GACAT‐3′) as it is in the caecilians (San Mauro et al., 2004; Zardoya & Meyer, 2000). However, a truncated CSB‐1 had been recorded in Xenopus laevis (Anura) (Roe, Ma, Wilson, & Wong, 1985). The CSB‐2 motif was not found in N. pleskei (Figure 5). In addition, the multiple motifs of mtDNA control regions (CR) may be associated with the transcription and replication of the mitochondrial genome (Taanman, 1999). The function of these conserved sequence blocks is unclear. Further study on the mechanistic basis of mtDNA replication is warranted for Nanorana species.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Main features of three Nanorana species control region. The location of features is shown in Table 4

Table 4.

Location of features in the D‐loop of three Nanorana species (Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana ventripunctata, and Nanorana pleskei)

Species Sequence in D‐loop Start position Stop position Length (bp)
Nanorana ventripunctata 6.5 tandem repeat units 21 830 5 × 124 + 66
TAS 119 135 17
TAS 243 259 17
TAS 367 383 17
TAS 491 507 17
TAS 615 631 17
TAS 739 755 17
OH 1,552 1,623 72
CSB‐1 1,713 1,740 28
CSB‐2 1809 1827 19
CSB‐3 1814 1831 18
10.8 tandem repeat units 1917 2035 10 × 11 + 9
10.9 tandem repeat units 2042 2,161 10 × 11 + 10
29.6 tandem repeat units 2,196 2,492 29 × 10 + 6
Nanorana parkeri 4.6 tandem repeat units 42 610 4 × 124 + 72
TAS 151 167 17
TAS 275 291 17
TAS 399 415 17
TAS 523 539 17
OH 1,389 1,460 72
CSB‐1 1,495 1,522 28
CSB‐2 1,595 1,613 19
CSB‐3 1,640 1,657 18
8.7 tandem repeat units 1,702 1,796 8 × 11 + 8
8.9 tandem repeat units 1801 1898 8 × 11 + 10
16.3 tandem repeat units 1898 2027 16 × 8 + 10
12.8 tandem repeat units 2028 2,129 12 × 8 + 8
Nanorana pleskei 3.6 tandem repeat units 22 467 3 × 124 + 74
TAS 130 146 17
TAS 254 270 17
TAS 378 394 17
OH 1,554 1,627 74
CSB‐1 514 541 28
CSB‐3 1,203 1,220 18
Open in a new tab

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Structures and alignments of identified putative termination‐associated sequences (TAS) and, conserved sequence blocks (CSB 1‐3). Alignment gaps and nucleotides identical to the first line are indicated by dashes (–) and a dot (∙), respectively. Variable nucleotides are marked with corresponding nucleotides

3.5. Phylogenetic relationships

The concatenated PCG data of the mitogenome sequences in our study contained 11,292 nucleotide positions, including 4,314 conserved sites, 6,978 variable sites and 6,505 potentially parsimony‐informative sites. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using BI and ML analyses, based on the nucleotide dataset. The use of PCG sequences of the mitogenomes has become an informative strategy for inferring phylogenetic relationships (Boore, Macey, & Medina, 2005). Using the 13 PCG sequences to concatenate may achieve a more complete analysis. BI and ML methods consistently support similar tree topologies by strong node‐supporting values.

So far, combined with the 38 mitochondrial genome sequences in GenBank database, our phylogenetic analyses revealed that the subfamily Dicroglossinae's monophyly was well supported (Li et al., 2014a, 2014b; Roelants et al., 2007; Yuan et al., 2016). The subfamily Dicroglossinae is the sister clade to the Occidozyginae (Figure 6). The Dicroglossinae species was divided into two clades with one clade (Clade 1) containing Nanorana, Quasipaa, and Limnonectes, and the other (Clade 2) including Fejervarya, Euphlyctis, and Hoplobatrachus (Figure 6), as supported by previous studies (Lv, Bi, & Fu, 2014; Yuan et al., 2016; Zhang, Xia, & Zeng, 2016). Quasipaa and Nanorana belong to the sister genus. Clade Quasipaa comprised Q. yei as the sister taxon to the subclade (BP = 100%, PP = 1.00) containing (((Q. jiulongensis + (Q. spinosa + Q. exilispinosa)) + (Q. shini + (Q. boulengeri + Q. verrucospinosa)))) (Figure 6). Within the genus Quasipaa, the phylogenetic inferences based on mtDNA sequences showed that all individuals of Q. boulengeri formed a monophyly with high support, sister to Q. verruspinosa (KF199147). This result is similar to the results from Che et al. (2009), but different to those of Qing et al. (2012). Furthermore, we find that Q. verruspinosa is paraphyletic in the genus Quasipaa, as one sample of Q. verruspinosa (KF19917) was grouped with Q. boulengeri, while another sample of Q. verruspinosa (NC_032333) was not (Figure 6). All the Nanorana species were clustered together. In the Nanorana clade, N. yunnanensis is the sister group of a clade composed of N. quadranus and N. taihangnica (Subclade 2). And the Subclade 2 composed of these 3 species is the sister group of a clade (Subclade 1) that includes N. pleskei, N. ventripunctata, N. parkeri and N. maculosa. So the Nanorana species clustered in a single monophyly. Our molecular phylogeny indicates N. ventripunctata and N. pleskei are more closely related compared with N. parkeri, and strongly supports that N. parkeri is basal to N. pleskei and N. ventripunctata based on 13 PCG genes of the mitogenome (BP = 100%, PP = 1.00) (Figure 6), in agreement with the relationships inferred by the research report of Che et al. (2009, 2010). However the phylogeny of the three species (N. parkeri, N. pleskei and N. ventripunctata) based on 13 PCGs was not concordant with those reported earlier based on 12 genes (three mitochondrial and nine nuclear genes) (Pyron & Wiens, 2011). This difference may be caused by the use of different molecular markers, and their evolutionary relationships need further investigating and searching for more evidences from molecular markers and morphological characters. Nanorana and Quasipaa were resolved as the sister group of the genus Limnonectes (BP = 99%, PP = 1.00). The phylogenetic relationships supported the authenticity of the two obtained mitogenomes among Nanorana. And the phylogenetic reconstruction using the whole mitogenome, rather than single genes, provided more credible results. The mitogenomic approach, as previously demonstrated (Cai, Che, Pang, Zhao, & Zhang, 2007; Liyan, Xia, Zheng, & Zeng, 2012; Yan et al., 2013), is an excellent tool with which to infer phylogenetic relationships within Neobatrachia. In the present study, all clades were well resolved, with only a few exceptions less than 90%, while Bayesian posterior probabilities were 1.00. Despite their fast evolutionary rates, mitochondrial genomes contain species‐specific evolutionary affinities, which can be efficiently recovered by improving taxon sampling (Rubinstein et al., 2013).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Results of phylogenetic analyses using BI and ML analysis indicated evolutionary relationships among 38 individuals based on 13 PCGs sequences. Babina subaspera (NC_022871) and Hylarana guentheri (NC_024748) were used as outgroups. Tree topologies produced by BI and ML analyses were equivalent. Bayesian posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap support (BP) values for ML analyses are shown in order on the nodes. The asterisks indicate new sequences generated in this study

4. CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the complete mitochondrial genomes of two Nanorana species were determined in this study. Our mitogenome analyses, including gene content, gene order, strand asymmetry, base composition, rRNA and tRNA secondary structure and phylogenetic analysis, indicate several significant features: a tandem repeat of the tRNA‐Met gene was detected in three Nanorana species, located between the tRNA‐Gln and ND2 genes. The control region contains distinct repeat regions at both 5′ and 3′‐sides, and the CSB‐2 motif was not found in the N. pleskei. Based on nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs, and using BI and maximum‐likelihood analyses, the phylogenetic data illustrate the taxonomic status of Nanorana and provides robust support that N. ventripunctata and N. pleskei are more closely related than N. parkeri. Our study provides useful additional data for further phylogenetic analysis of the Nanorana genus. Expanding our knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships within the Nanorana genus will ultimately aid in future research to protect and maintain biodiversity within many other anuran species. However, the proposed evolutionary relationships among these three species based on the findings that emerged in the study should be accepted with caution due to limited taxon sampling. Many aspects of the phylogeny of the genus Nanorana remain to be resolved and further analysis based on more molecular information (including nuclear gene data) and extensive taxon sampling is necessary to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among genus Nanorana or Dicroglossidae.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Jiang L., Ruan Q., and Chen W. designed the manuscript, You Z. and Yu P. analyzed the data, and Jiang L. and Chen W. wrote the manuscript.

Supporting information

 

Click here for additional data file. (38.9KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Xiaoyan Ma for providing the photograph of Nanorana parkeri and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that substantially improved this manuscript. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31670392), the Natural Sciences Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar of Sichuan (No. 2016JQ0038), the Ecological Security and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (Nos. ESP1706, ESP1410), the Research Project of Education Office Project of Sichuan Province (Nos. 18ZA0261, 15ZB0279), Scientific Research Foundation Projects of Mianyang Normal University (No. QD2015A003), Ecological Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Research Center of Northwest Sichuan (No. 075019), and the Scientific Research Fund of Mianyang Normal University (Nos. PY‐2016‐A03 and MYSY2017JC02).

Jiang L, You Z, Yu P, Ruan Q, Chen W. The first complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Nanorana parkeri and Nanorana ventripunctata (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae), with related phylogenetic analyses. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:6972–6987. 10.1002/ece3.4214

Contributor Information

Qiping Ruan, Email: qpruan20141230@163.com.

Wei Chen, Email: wchen1949@163.com.

REFERENCES

  1. Alam, M. S. , Kurabayashi, A. , Hayashi, Y. , Sano, N. , Khan, M. R. , Fujii, T. , & Sumida, M. (2010). Complete mitochondrial genomes and novel gene rearrangements in two dicroglossid frogs, Hoplobatrachus tigerinus and Euphlyctis hexadactylus, from Bangladesh. Genes & Genetic Systems, 85, 219–232. 10.1266/ggs.85.219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boore, J. L. (1999). Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 27, 1767–1780. 10.1093/nar/27.8.1767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boore, J. L. (2001). Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii . Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 1413–1416. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boore, J. L. , Macey, J. R. , & Medina, M. (2005). Sequencing and comparing whole mitochondrial genomes of animals. Methods in Enzymology, 395, 311–348. 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95019-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bossuyt, F. , Brown, R. M. , Hillis, D. M. , Cannatella, D. C. , & Milinkovitch, M. C. (2006). Phylogeny and biogeography of a cosmopolitan frog radiation: Late Cretaceous diversification resulted in continent‐scale endemism in the family Ranidae. Systematic Biology, 55, 579–594. 10.1080/10635150600812551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cai, H. X. , Che, J. , Pang, J. F. , Zhao, E. M. , & Zhang, Y. P. (2007). Paraphyly of Chinese Amolops (Anura, Ranidae) and phylogenetic position of the rare Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus . Zootaxa, 1531, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  7. Che, J. , Hu, J. S. , Zhou, W. W. , Murphy, R. W. , Papenfuss, T. J. , Chen, M. Y. , … Zhang, Y. P. (2009). Phylogeny of the asian spiny frog tribe Paini (Family Dicroglossidae) sensu Dubois. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 50, 59–73. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Che, J. , Zhou, W. W. , Hu, J. S. , Yan, F. , Papenfuss, T. J. , Wake, D. B. , & Zhang, Y. P. (2010). Spiny frogs (paini) illuminate the history of the Himalayan region and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 13765–13770. 10.1073/pnas.1008415107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, G. Y. , Liu, J. Y. , Jiang, J. P. , Xie, F. , & Zheng, Z. H. (2005). Systematics and distribution of the genus Nanorana . Herpetologica Sinica, 10, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, G. , Wang, B. , Liu, J. , Xie, F. , & Jiang, J. (2011). Complete mitochondrial genome of Nanorana pleskei (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) and evolutionary characteristics. Current Zoology, 57, 785–805. 10.1093/czoolo/57.6.785 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Z. , Zhai, X. , Zhu, Y. , & Chen, X. (2015). Complete mitochondrial genome of the Ye's spiny‐vented frog Yerana yei (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Mitochondrial DNA, 26, 1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Sá, R. O. , Streicher, J. W. , Sekonyela, R. , Forlani, M. C. , Loader, S. P. , Greenbaum, E. , & Haddad, C. F. (2012). Molecular phylogeny of microhylid frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) with emphasis on relationships among New World genera. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fei, L. , Hu, S. Q. , Ye, C. Y. , & Huang, Y. Z. (2009). Fauna Sinica: Amphibia, Vol. 3 Anura. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fei, L. , Lu, S. , Yang, D. , Sushil, D. , Annemarie, O. , & Tej, K. S. (2004). Nanorana parkeri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species e.T58392A11766426. 10.2305/iucn.uk.2004.rlts.t58392a11766426.en.2004 Downloaded on 03 February 2017. [DOI]
  15. Fei, L. , Ye, C. Y. , Huang, Y. Z. , Jiang, J. P. , & Xie, F. (2005). An illustrated key to Chinese Amphibians. Sichuan Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  16. Frost, D. R. (2018). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 (Date of access). American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/ index.html.
  17. Howlader, M. S. A. , Nair, A. , Gopalan, S. V. , & Merilä, J. (2015). A new species of Microhyla (Anura: Microhylidae) from Nilphamari, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 10, e0119825 10.1371/journal.pone.0119825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Igawa, T. , Kurabayashi, A. , Usuki, C. , Fujii, T. , & Sumida, M. (2008). Complete mitochondrial genomes of three Neobatrachian Anurans: A case study of divergence time estimation using different data and calibration settings. Gene, 407, 116–129. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang, J. P. , Dubois, A. , Ohler, A. , Tillier, A. , Chen, X. , Xie, F. , & Stöck, M. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Anura, Amphibia) based on partial sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes. Zoological Science, 22, 353–362. 10.2108/zsj.22.353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang, J. P. , & Zhou, K. Y. (2001). Evolutionary relationships among Chinese Ranid frogs inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA genes. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 47, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, J. P. , & Zhou, K. Y. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships among Chinese ranids inferred from sequence data set of 12S and 16S rDNA. The Herpetological Journal, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kurabayashi, A. , & Sumida, M. (2009). PCR primers for the Neobatrachian mitochondrial genome. Current Herpetology, 28, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kurabayashi, A. , Usuki, C. , Mikami, N. , Fujii, T. , Yonekawa, H. , Sumida, M. , & Hasegawa, M. (2006). Complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of a Malagasy poison frog, Mantella madagascariensis: Evolutionary implications on mitochondrial genomes of higher anuran groups. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 39, 223–236. 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurabayashi, A. , Yoshikawa, N. , Sato, N. , Hayashi, Y. , Oumi, S. , Fujii, T. , & Sumida, M. (2010). Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the endangered frog Odorrana ishikawae (family Ranidae) and unexpected diversity of mt gene arrangements in ranids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56, 543–553. 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanave, C. , Preparata, G. , Saccone, C. , & Serio, G. (1984). A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 20, 86–93. 10.1007/BF02101990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, E. , Li, X. , Wu, X. , Ge, F. , Zhang, M. , Shi, H. , … Jiang, J. (2014a). Complete nucleotide sequence and gene rearrangement of the mitochondrial genome of Occidozyga martensii . Journal of Genetics, 93, 631–641. 10.1007/s12041-014-0418-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Y. , Zhang, H. , Wu, X. , Xue, H. , Yan, P. , & Wu, X. (2014b). A novel mitogenomic rearrangement for Odorrana Schmackeri (Anura: Ranidae) and phylogeny of Ranidae inferred from thirteen mitochondrial protein‐coding genes. Amphibia‐Reptilia, 35, 331–343. 10.1163/15685381-00002958 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Z. Q. , Wang, Y. Q. , & Bing, S. (2005). The mitochondrial genome organization of the rice frog, Fejervarya limnocharis (Amphibia: Anura): A new gene order in the vertebrate mtDNA. Gene, 346, 145–151. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, J. , Wang, C. , Fu, D. , Hu, X. , Xie, X. , Liu, P. , … Li, M. H. (2015). Phylogeography of Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Ranidae) and multiple refugia on the tibetan plateau revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Scientific Reports UK, 5, 9857 10.1038/srep09857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liyan, Q. , Xia, Y. , Zheng, Y. , & Zeng, X. (2012). A de novo case of floating chromosomal polymorphisms by translocation Inquasipaa boulengeri (Anura: Dicroglossidae). PLoS ONE, 7, e46163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, S. (1995). A study of relationships among ranid frogs of the genera Nanorana and Altirana in the Transhimalaya Mountains of China. Asiatic Herpetological Research, 6, 73–77. 10.5962/bhl.part.7988 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lu, S. , & Yang, D. (2004). Nanorana ventripunctata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004:e.T58394A11767025. 10.2305/iucn.uk.2004.rlts.t58394a11767025.en.downloaded on 03 February 2017. [DOI]
  33. Lv, B. , Bi, K. , & Fu, J. Z. (2014). A phylogeographic evaluation of the Amolops mantzorum species group: Cryptic species and plateau uplift. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 73, 40–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Macey, J. R. , Schulte, J. A. , Larson, A. , & Papenfuss, T. J. (1998). Tandem duplication via light‐strand synthesis may provide a precursor for mitochondrial genome rearrangement. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 71–75. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matsui, M. , Hamidy, A. , Belabut, D. M. , Ahmad, N. , Panha, S. , Sudin, A. , … Nishikawa, K. (2011). Systematic relationships of Oriental tiny frogs of the family Microhylidae (Amphibia, Anura) as revealed by mtDNA genealogy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61, 167–176. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Perna, N. T. , & Kocher, T. D. (1995). Patterns of nucleotide composition at four fold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 41, 353–358. 10.1007/BF01215182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Posada, D. (2008). jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1253–1256. 10.1093/molbev/msn083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Posada, D. , & Buckley, T. R. (2004). Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio. Tests Systematic Biology, 53, 793–808. 10.1080/10635150490522304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pyron, R. A. , & Wiens, J. J. (2011). A large‐scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61, 543–583. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Qing, L. , Xia, Y. , Zheng, Y. , & Zeng, X. (2012). A De Novo Case of Floating Chromosomal Polymorphisms by Translocation in Quasipaa boulengeri (Anura, Dicroglossidae). Plos One, 7, e46163 10.1371/journal.pone.0046163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ren, Z. , Zhu, B. , Ma, E. , Wen, J. , Tu, T. , Cao, Y. , … Zhong, Y. (2009). Complete nucleotide sequence and gene arrangement of the mitochondrial genome of the crab‐eating frog Fejervarya cancrivora, and evolutionary implications. Gene, 441, 148–155. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roe, B. A. , Ma, D. P. , Wilson, R. K. , & Wong, J. F. H. (1985). The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 260, 9759–9774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roelants, K. , Gower, D. J. , Wilkinson, M. , Loader, S. P. , Biju, S. D. , Guillaume, K. , … Bossuyt, F. (2007). Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 887–892. 10.1073/pnas.0608378104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Roelants, K. , Jiang, J. P. , & Bossuyt, F. (2004). Endemic ranid (Amphibia: Anura) genera in southern mountain ranges of the Indian subcontinent represent ancient frog lineages: Evidence from molecular data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 730–740. 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ronquist, F. , Teslenko, M. , van der Mark, P. , Ayres, D. L. , Darling, A. , Höhna, S. , … Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012). Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rubinstein, N. D. , Feldstein, T. , Shenkar, N. , Botero‐Castro, F. , Griggio, F. , Mastrototaro, F. , … Huchon, D. (2013). Deep sequencing of mixed total DNA without barcodes allows efficient assembly of highly plastic ascidian mitochondrial genomes. Genome Biology and Evolution, 5, 1185–1199. 10.1093/gbe/evt081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sahoo, P. K. , Goel, C. , Kumar, R. , Dhama, N. , Ali, S. , Sarma, D. , … Barat, A. (2015). The complete mitochondrial genome of threatened chocolate mahseer (Neolissochilus hexagonolepis) and its phylogeny. Gene, 570, 299–303. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. San Mauro, D. , Gower, D. J. , Oommen, O. V. , Wilkinson, M. , & Zardoya, R. (2004). Phylogeny of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona) based on complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear RAG1. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 33, 413–427. 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. San Mauro, D. , Gower, D. J. , Zardoya, R. , & Wilkinson, M. (2006). A hotspot of gene order rearrangement by tandem duplication and random loss in the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 227–234. 10.1093/molbev/msj025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sano, N. , Kurabayashi, A. , Fujii, T. , Yonekawa, H. , & Sumidam, M. (2004). Complete nucleotide sequence and gene rearrangement of the mitochondrial genome of the bell‐ring frog, Buergeria buergeri (family Rhacophoridae). Genes & Genetic Systems, 79, 151–163. 10.1266/ggs.79.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schattner, P. , Brooks, A. N. , & Lowe, T. M. (2005). The tRNAscan‐SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, 686–689. 10.1093/nar/gki366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shan, X. , Xia, Y. , Zheng, Y. C. , Zou, F. D. , & Zeng, X. M. (2014). The complete mitochondrial genome of Quasipaa boulengeri (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Mitochondrial DNA, 25, 83–84. 10.3109/19401736.2013.782023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Simon, C. , Frati, F. , Beckenbach, A. , Crespi, B. , Liu, H. , & Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87, 651–701. 10.1093/aesa/87.6.651 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post‐analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30, 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Su, X. , Wu, X. B. , Yan, P. , Cao, S. Y. , & Hu, Y. L. (2007). Rearrangement of a mitochondrial tRNA gene of the concave‐eared torrent frog, Amolops tormotus . Gene, 394, 25–34. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sun, Y. B. , Xiong, Z. J. , Xiang, X. Y. , Liu, S. P. , Zhou, W. W. , Tu, X. L. , … Zhang, Y. P. (2015). Whole‐genome sequence of the tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri and the comparative evolution of tetrapod genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, E1257 10.1073/pnas.1501764112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Taanman, J. W. (1999). The mitochondrial genome: Structure, transcription, translation and replication. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Bioenergetics, 1410, 103–123. 10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00161-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tamura, K. , Stecher, G. , Peterson, D. , Filipski, A. , & Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Thompson, J. D. , Gibson, T. J. , Plewniak, F. , Jeanmougin, F. , & Higgins, D. G. (1997). The Clustal X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24, 4876–4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Y. , Annemarie, O. , Muhammad, S. K. , & Xie, F. (2004). Nanorana pleskei. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T58393A11766678. 10.2305/iucn UK.2004.RLTS.T58393A11766678.en. Downloaded on 03 February 2017. [DOI]
  61. Wang, C. , Hu, X. , Xie, X. , Liu, P. , Merilä, J. , Zhang, Q. , & Li, M. (2013). Isolation and characterization of 113 polymorphic microsatellite loci for the tibetan frog (Nanorana parkeri) using next generation sequencing. Conservation Genetics Resources, 5, 915–924. 10.1007/s12686-013-9932-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Xia, Y. L. , Liu, Y. Q. , & Lu, C. (2002). Principles and methods for the extraction of mitochondrial DNA of animals. Newsletter of Sericultural Science, 22, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yan, F. , Zhou, W. W. , Zhao, H. T. , Yuan, Z. Y. , Wang, Y. Y. , Jiang, K. , … Zhang, Y. P. (2013). Geological events play a larger role than Pleistocene climatic fluctuations in the genetic structure of the montane stream‐dwelling frog Quasipaa boulengeri (Anura: Dicroglossidae) in southern China. Molecular Ecology, 22, 1120–1133. 10.1111/mec.12153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yong, H. S. , Song, S. L. , Lim, P. E. , Eamsobhana, P. , & Tan, J. (2016). Complete mitochondrial genome and phylogeny of Microhyla butleri (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 66, 243–253. 10.1016/j.bse.2016.04.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yuan, S. , Xia, Y. , Zheng, Y. , & Zeng, X. (2016). Next‐generation sequencing of mixed genomic DNA allows efficient assembly of rearranged mitochondrial genomes in Amolops chunganensis and Quasipaa boulengeri . Peerj, 4, e2786 10.7717/peerj.2786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zardoya, R. , & Meyer, A. (2000). Mitochondrial evidence on the phylogenetic position of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Genetics, 155, 765–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, W. , Chao, Y. , Lai, S. , Li, J. , & Zhao, J. (2000). Study on the separation and purification of mitochondrial dna of inner mongolia cashmere goat and analysis of RFLP on it. Xibei Nonglin Keji Daxue Xuebao, 17, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang, P. , Chen, Y. Q. , Liu, Y. F. , Zhou, H. , & Qu, L. H. (2003). The complete mitochondrial genome of the Chinese giant salamander, Andrias davidianus (Amphibia: Caudata). Gene, 311, 93–98. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00560-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang, D. R. , Chen, M. Y. , Murphy, R. W. , Che, J. , Pang, J. F. , Hu, J. S. , … Zhang, Y. P. (2010). Genealogy and palaeodrainage basins in Yunnan province: Phylogeography of the Yunnan spiny frog, Nanorana yunnanensis (Dicroglossidae). Molecular Ecology, 19, 3406–3420. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04747.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, J. F. , Nie, L. W. , Wang, Y. , & Hu, L. L. (2009). The complete mitochondrial genome of the large‐headed frog, Limnonectes bannaensis (Amphibia: Anura), and a novel gene organization in the vertebrate mtDNA. Gene, 442, 119–127. 10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, C. H. , Xia, Y. , & Zeng, X. M. (2016). Characterization of the mitochondrial genome of Amolops tuberodepressus (Anura: Ranidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27, 2893–2894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhou, W. , Zhang, B. , Chen, H. , Jin, J. , Yang, J. , Wang, Y. , … Che, J. (2014). DNA barcodes and species distribution models evaluate threats of global climate changes to genetic diversity: A case study from Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Dicroglossidae). PLoS ONE, 9, e103899 10.1371/journal.pone.0103899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhou, Y. , Zhang, J. Y. , Zheng, R. Q. , Yu, B. G. , & Yang, G. (2009). Complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the mitochondrial genome of Paa spinosa (Anura: Ranoidae). Gene, 447, 86–96. 10.1016/j.gene.2009.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

Click here for additional data file. (38.9KB, docx)

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES