Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2018 Jun 25;8(14):7195–7205. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4254

DNA barcoding herbaceous and woody plant species at a subalpine forest dynamics plot in Southwest China

Shao‐Lin Tan 1,2,3, Ya‐Huang Luo 1, Peter M Hollingsworth 4, Kevin S Burgess 5, Kun Xu 6, De‐Zhu Li 2,3,✉, Lian‐Ming Gao 1,6,✉
PMCID: PMC6065341  PMID: 30073078

Abstract

Although DNA barcoding has been widely used to identify plant species composition in temperate and tropical ecosystems, relatively few studies have used DNA barcodes to document both herbaceous and woody components of forest plot. A total of 201 species (72 woody species and 129 herbaceous species) representing 135 genera distributed across 64 families of seed plants were collected in a 25 ha CForBio subalpine forest dynamics plot. In total, 491 specimens were screened for three DNA regions of the chloroplast genome (rbcL, matK, and trnH‐psbA) as well as the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. We quantified species resolution for each barcode separately or in combination using a ML tree‐based method. Amplification and sequencing success were highest for rbcL, followed by trnH‐psbA, which performed better than ITS and matK. The rbcL + ITS barcode had slightly higher species resolution rates (88.60%) compared with rbcL + matK (86.60%) and rbcL + trnH‐psbA (86.01%). The addition of trnH‐psbA or ITS to the rbcL + matK barcode only marginally increased species resolution rates, although in combination the four barcodes had the highest discriminatory power (90.21%). The situations where DNA barcodes did not discriminate among species were typically associated with higher numbers of co‐occurring con‐generic species. In addition, herbaceous species were much better resolved than woody species. Our study represents one of the first applications of DNA barcodes in a subalpine forest dynamics plot and contributes to our understanding of patterns of genetic divergence among woody and herbaceous plant species.

Keywords: DNA barcoding, forest dynamics plot, herbaceous species, species identification, woody species, Yulong Mountain

1. INTRODUCTION

Accurate identification of plant species is a key component of biological, ecological, and evolutionary studies. Standard morphological techniques can be ineffective, especially for large and complex taxa (Liu et al., 2017; Percy et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2015), particular life stages (Gonzalez et al., 2009), or when only plant fragments are available (Jones et al., 2011; Kesanakurti et al., 2011). To support morphological identification, DNA barcoding has become widely used for the identification and confirmation of plant species (Fazekas et al., 2008; Hollingsworth et al., 2009; Kress & Erickson, 2007; Kress, Wurdack, Zimmer, Weigt & Janzen, 2005; Li et al., 2011). The plastid DNA regions rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA and the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA have previously been used in systematic studies at various taxonomic levels (Azani et al., 2017; Baldwin et al., 1995; Chase et al., 1993; Harrington, Edwards, Johnson, Chase & Gadek, 2005), as well as for the taxonomy and species identification of specific target families and genera (Liu, Moeller, Gao, Zhang & Li, 2011; Xu et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2015). Increasingly, surveys of local (Kress et al., 2009) and regional (Burgess et al., 2011; De Vere et al., 2012; Liu, Yan et al., 2015) floras are based on DNA barcoding with these regions.

One key step in the DNA barcoding process is the establishment of a reliable and comprehensive database (reference library) that includes both high‐quality DNA barcode sequences and accurately identified voucher specimens (Taberlet, Coissac, Pompanon, Brochmann & Willerslev, 2012). Once established, such databases can become a valuable toolkit for molecular ecologists to identify plant material such as pollen, seeds, seedlings, roots, and even bark fragments (Liu et al.,2018). DNA barcoding is now becoming essential for a broad range of ecological applications, such as biodiversity assessments (Lahaye et al., 2008; Yoccoz et al., 2012), establishing pollination networks (Bell et al., 2016; Vamosi, Gong, Adamowicz & Packer, 2017), diet analysis (Kartzinel et al., 2015; Valentini, Pompanon & Taberlet, 2009), and determining the mechanisms underlying community assembly (Kress et al., 2009, 2010; Pei et al., 2011).

During the last three decades, CTFS‐ForestGEO (http://www.forestgeo.si.edu/), a worldwide network of over 60 long‐term forest dynamics plots (FDPs), has been established for monitoring of community dynamics in forest ecosystems and investigation of community assembly mechanisms (Anderson‐Teixeira et al., 2012). To date, millions of trees representing over 10,000 species have been tagged, mapped, and identified. The application of well‐resolved phylogenies based on the DNA barcode sequences of species within these communities is substantially improving our understanding of community assembly mechanisms (Kembel & Hubbell, 2006; Kress et al., 2009; Webb, 2000; Yang et al., 2014). However, although there are over 60 plots in the CTFS‐ForestGEO network, only a few plots have genetic libraries (Kress et al., 2009; Pei et al., 2015) or community phylogenies (Erickson et al., 2014; Kress et al., 2009, 2010; Pei et al., 2011) based on DNA barcodes.

Herbaceous plants contribute substantially to the diversity and abundance of forests ecosystems, particularly in temperate regions (Gilliam, 2007, 2014; Luo et al., 2016a, 2016b; Wang, Tang & Fang, 2007). However, interactions between herbaceous and woody plant layers in community assemblages have long been neglected in forest dynamics models, even though it is widely known that herbaceous species can impact the regeneration of tree species (Murphy, Salpeter & Comita, 2016; Thrippleton, Bugmann, Kramer‐Priewasser & Snell, 2016). DNA barcoding has mainly been used for tree species in forest dynamic plots of tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions (Erickson et al., 2014; Kress et al., 2009; Pei et al., 2015). Thus in many cases, the herbaceous component of the community remains underexplored. In this study, we use DNA barcodes to identify and document the herbaceous and woody flora of a 25‐ha subalpine spruce‐fir forest dynamics plot on the Yulong Mountain, northwestern Yunnan, China. We aim to address the following three questions: (a) What barcode strategy provides the highest species resolution in a subalpine forest? (b) Do species discrimination rates vary among herbaceous and woody species in this community? (c) Does the number of species within a genus affect species resolution rates in high elevation forest dynamic plots?

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study site and sampling

Yulong Mountain (26°58′–27°18′ N, 100°04′–100°16′ E) belongs to the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains Region, which is a part of a global biodiversity hotspot in the Mountains of Southwest China; over 2,800 species of seed plants have been recorded from this mountain (Liu, Li et al., 2015). This study targets a 25‐ha (500 m × 500 m) forest dynamics plot that is located in the subalpine region of the east side of Yulong Mountain. The plot was established between 2012 and 2014 according to standard protocols established by the CTFS‐ForestGEO network (Huang et al., 2017): all trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥1.0 cm were tagged, identified, measured, and mapped according to these protocols. The altitude of the plot ranges from 3220 m to 3344 m, it is by far the highest forest dynamics plot established to date.

Between 2013 and 2015, a total of 491 specimens (201 species, 135 genera, and 64 families of seed plants) were sampled for the recovery of DNA barcodes (Supporting Information Table S1), and each species were represented by two to six individuals except for nineteen rare species with a single individual sampled. Our samples included 129 herbaceous species and 72 woody species. All DNA vouchers were deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, China.

2.2. DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica‐dried leaf tissue using a modified CTAB method (Doyle, 1987). The DNA was diluted with TE buffer to a final concentration of 10–50 ng/μl for PCR amplification. We amplified the rbcL, trnH‐psbA, matK, and ITS (ITS for Angiosperms; ITS2 for Gymnosperms) gene regions based on the primers and PCR conditions outlined in Supporting Information Table S2 following Gao et al. (2012). PCR mixtures (20 μl) contained 10–50 ng template DNA, 2.5 μM forward and reverse primer each, and 10 μl 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (TIANGEN). PCR amplification was performed using a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (PerkinElmer, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR products were purified using ExoSAP‐IT (GE Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA). Using the same primers as those used for PCR, bidirectional sequencing reactions were carried out on an ABI 3730 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) in the biology laboratory of the Germplasm Bank of China, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Some of the PCR products were sent to Tsingke Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing for purification and sequencing. All sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers are listed in Supporting Information Table S6).

2.3. Data analysis

Raw sequences were assembled and manually edited in Geneious (version 4.8.5). Consensus sequences were generated and aligned using ClustalW with default parameter settings and adjusted manually where necessary. All rbcL and matK sequences could be readily aligned but trnH‐psbA and ITS sequences had to be partitioned and aligned separately by family, order or closely related orders: in total 24 separate alignments were created and then concatenated with the rbcL and matK alignments (Kress et al., 2009).

Compared with other methods for DNA barcoding analysis, the tree‐based method has the advantage of providing a graphical representation of species divergence (Hebert, Stoeckle, Zemlak & Francis, 2004). In this study, Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees were used for testing the efficiency of DNA barcodes for species resolution. The ML trees based on the GTR + GAMMA model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates were reconstructed in RAxML via CIPRES (http://WWW.phylo.org/). A species was considered as being correctly resolved when all the individuals of the same species formed a monophyletic group with a bootstrap value over 50%. We assessed variation in percentage species resolution rates for rbcL and matK barcodes separately, and in combination (rbcL + matK [RM], rbcL + trnH‐psbA [RP], rbcL + ITS [RI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA [RMP], rbcL + matK + ITS [RMI], and rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA + ITS [RMPI]. We also assessed rates of species resolution among herbaceous species and woody plant species for the same barcode combinations. Differences in species resolution rates among genera with varying numbers of species per genus (1–5) and the type of barcode combination were compared using a Poisson distribution of a generalized linear model in the R package multcomp. We also performed a simple linear regression to detect whether species resolution rates were significant negatively correlated with species/genus ratio using the data obtained from floristic DNA barcoding studies at plot and regional scales. All analyses were implemented in R software (R Core Team 2016).

3. RESULTS

For gymnosperms, we obtained high‐quality bidirectional sequences for the rbcL, matK, and trnH‐psbA gene regions of the chloroplast genome; we were able to obtain sequences for the ITS region from all but one sample (Supporting Information Table S3). For angiosperms (Supporting Information Table S3), PCR and sequencing success of the rbcL gene region were the highest (99.37% and 98.74%, respectively). PCR success of trnH‐psbA was also high (97.05%), but sequencing success was lower (92.02%). Substantially more effort was required to recover ITS sequences, which had relatively high PCR success (96.01%) but sequencing success (89.50%) for ITS was the lowest among the four gene regions, largely due to fungal contaminants. Three pairs of primers were required for the recovery of matK, but PCR and sequencing success were relatively low for this gene region (93.07% and 92.02%, respectively).

All gymnosperms (six species belonging to six genera) were correctly resolved using the four markers separately. For angiosperms, species resolution was higher for matK (84.24%) compared to rbcL (80.73%; Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1a). The combination of the two chloroplast coding regions (RM) resolved 86.60% of angiosperm species, similar to RP (86.01%), and slightly lower than RI (88.60%). Adding the supplementary barcodes trnH‐psbA or ITS to RM only slightly increased percentage species resolution (RMP 87.63%; RMI 89.18%), although the four barcodes in combination (RMPI) achieved the highest rate of species resolution (90.21%; Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Discrimination success of DNA barcodes and their combinations for (a) Species and genera of angiosperms and (b) Herbaceous and woody species, in a high elevation subalpine plot on Yulong Mountain, Yunnan, Northwest China. We assessed variation in percentage discrimination for rbcL [R] and matK [M] barcodes separately, and in combination (rbcL + matK [RM], rbcL + trnH‐psbA [RP], rbcL + ITS [RI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA [RMP], rbcL + matK + ITS [RMI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA +  ITS [RMPI]

Overall resolution rates of herbaceous species tended to be higher than that of woody species for any barcode or barcode combination (Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1b). For the identification of herbaceous species, matK distinguished a higher proportion (92.62%) of species than rbcL (84.92%). In combination, species resolution rates for RM (92.97%), RP (92.91%), RI (94.53%), and RMP (94.53%) were higher than any single barcode. RMPI (97.66%) and RMI (97.66%) had the highest values (Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1b). Species resolution rates of woody species were lower for all barcodes, which ranged from 65.63% (matK) to 74.24% (RM, RI, RMP, and RMPI), compared to herbaceous plants, which ranged from 84.92% (rbcL) to 97.66% (RMI and RMPI). Species resolution rates between herbaceous species and woody species for R, RM, RP, RI, and RMP, were lower for woody species by 13.71%, 18.73%, 20.18%, 20.29%, and 20.29%, respectively. Woody plants had much lower values for other combinations of gene regions, differences between these two groups of taxa were greatest for RMPI (23.42%) and RMI (24.93%). The single greatest difference in species resolution rate between herbaceous species and woody species was for matK (26.99% lower for woody species). Although adding trnH‐psbA or ITS to the core barcode RM did not improve resolution among woody species it did improve the resolution of herbaceous species. The improvement of species discrimination was greater by adding ITS (RMI, 97.66%) than by adding trnH‐psbA (RMP, 94.53%) for herbaceous plants (Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1b).

Percent species resolution varied among genera and ranged from 0–100% (Supporting Information Figure S1). Single barcodes rbcL and matK, as well as any barcode combination were able to distinguish all species in genera represented by single species (Table 1; Figure 2). Genera with two species had the highest percent species resolution rates among polytypic genera, ranging from 90% (matK) to 97.06% (RM, RP, RMP, and RMPI). The resolution rate of any barcode or barcode combination was lower when the number of species per genus increased to three species per genus, which ranged from 57.14% (rbcL) to 85.71% (RMI and RMPI). Genera with four species showed the lowest level of species discrimination, which ranged from 25% (rbcL) to 54.17% (RI, RMI, and RMPI). Genera with five species per genus were better resolved than that of genera with four species, but were less resolved than genera with one and two species. In genera with five species, rbcL alone resolved 55% of the species, matK and RP resolved 75%, and other barcode combinations resolved 80% of the species (Table 1; Figure 2).

Table 1.

Percentage species discrimination using DNA barcodes for genera that vary in the number of species per genus (S/G) in the Yulong Mountain Forest Dynamics Plot (YFDP), Northwest Yunnan, China

Barcode S/G = 1 (%) S/G = 2 (%) S/G = 3 (%) S/G = 4 (%) S/G = 5 (%)
R 100 94.12 57.14 25.00 55.00
M 100 90.00 61.11 41.67 75.00
RM 100 97.06 66.67 41.67 80.00
RP 100 97.06 71.43 37.50 75.00
RI 100 91.18 80.95 54.17 80.00
RMP 100 97.06 71.43 45.83 80.00
RMI 100 91.18 85.71 54.17 80.00
RMPI 100 97.06 85.71 54.17 80.00
Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Percentage species discrimination among genera with different numbers of species in a high elevation subalpine plot on Yulong Mountain, Yunnan, Northwest China. We assessed variation in percentage species discrimination for rbcL [R] and matK [M] barcodes separately, and in combination (rbcL + matK [RM], rbcL + trnH‐psbA [RP], rbcL + ITS [RI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA [RMP], rbcL + matK + ITS [RMI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA +  ITS [RMPI]. Numbers along top of figure represent genera that vary in the number of species per genus (1–5)

The generalized linear model analysis indicated that DNA barcode regions (df = 7, χ2 = 15.19; p = 0.0336), as well as the number of species per genus (df = 4, χ2 = 2,254.29; p < 0.001), have a significant effect on the species resolution rate. The interaction between DNA barcodes and the number of species per genus was also significant (df = 28, χ2 = 201.97; p < 0.001). Significant differences in percentage species resolution among DNA barcodes were only detected in genera with over three species (Supporting Information Table S5; Figure 2). In genera with three species, the species resolution rate of rbcL was significantly lower than that of RI, RMI, and RMPI (Supporting Information Table S5; Figure 2). Moreover, the species resolution rate of matK and RM were only significantly lower than that of RMI and RMPI. In genera with four species, the species resolution rate of rbcL was significantly lower than other barcodes except for RP. In addition, the resolution rate of RP was significantly lower than that of the barcode combinations of RI, RMI, and RMPI (Supporting Information Table S5; Figure 2). In genera with five species, however, the species resolution rate of rbcL was significantly lower than other barcodes except for matK and RP, while the differences between other barcodes were not significant (Supporting Information Table S5; Figure 2).

When we used the generalized linear models to compare species resolution rates among genera with different numbers of species, genera with four species had significantly lower rates than that of other genera by any barcode or barcode combination (Table 2; Figure 2). The species resolution rates of genera with one species were higher than that of genera with four species and three species, and only RMI and RMPI were not significant compared to genera with three species. Genera with one species were also better resolved than genera with five species, but only rbcL, matK, and RP were significant (Table 2; Figure 2). No difference was detected between genera with one species and two species, and the same pattern was found between genera with three species and five species (Table 2; Figure 2). Genera with two species were better resolved than genera with three and four species, but RI, RMI, and RMPI showed no difference in discriminating genera with two species and three species. The species resolution rates of genera with two species were also higher than that of genera with five species, but only rbcL and RP were significant.

Table 2.

Differences of species discrimination with DNA barcodes between groups of genera with different numbers of species in the YFDP plot, based on a generalized linear model. Numbers in bold indicate significant differences in species discrimination. We assessed variation in percentage species discrimination for rbcL [R] and matK [M] barcodes separately, and in combination (rbcL + matK [RM], rbcL + trnH‐psbA [RP], rbcL + ITS [RI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA [RMP], rbcL + matK + ITS [RMI], rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA + ITS [RMPI]. Numbers along top of table represent pairwise comparisons among genera that vary in the number of species per genus (e.g. 2 vs. 1)

Pairwise comparison of resolution rate between genera with different numbers of species
2‐1 3‐1 4‐1 5‐1 3‐2 4‐2 5‐2 4‐3 5‐3 5‐4
R z 2.240 10.959 16.843 8.764 8.926 15.525 7.471 8.634 0.455 7.446
Pr(>|z|) 1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1 <0.001
M z 3.610 8.528 13.655 4.902 5.577 11.186 2.856 6.007 1.582 6.864
Pr(>|z|) 0.239 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
RM z 1.119 8.539 13.664 3.926 7.152 12.460 3.164 6.007 2.503 7.728
Pr(>|z|) 1 <0.001 <0.001 0.067 <0.001 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
RP z 1.119 7.331 14.540 4.905 6.006 13.381 4.108 8.027 0.668 7.860
Pr(>|z|) 1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.031 <0.001 1 <0.001
RI z 3.370 4.873 10.867 3.925 2.411 8.535 2.130 5.784 0.178 4.952
Pr(>|z|) 0.587 <0.001 <0.001 0.068 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
RMP z 1.119 7.333 12.754 3.926 6.006 11.519 3.164 5.910 1.583 6.774
Pr(>|z|) 1 <0.001 <0.001 0.067 <0.001 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
RMI z 3.372 3.662 10.869 3.926 1.285 8.535 2.130 6.664 0.997 4.952
Pr(>|z|) 0.582 0.195 <0.001 0.067 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
RMPI z 1.119 3.662 10.869 3.926 2.607 9.611 3.164 6.664 0.997 4.952
Pr(>|z|) 1 0.195 <0.001 0.067 1 <0.001 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
Open in a new tab

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. Sequence recovery

PCR and sequencing success of gymnosperms was very high with only a single pair of universal primers, and only slightly more effort was necessary for the recovery of rbcL and trnH‐psbA from angiosperms. Considerable effort, however, was required for the recovery of matK and ITS barcode regions: three pairs of primers were used for the recovery of matK, and even then, this region still had a relatively low sequence recovery rate. Sequence recovery was the lowest for the ITS gene region, due in large part, to fungal contaminations. Our results are comparable to other studies, which found that among the four standard plant DNA barcodes, rbcL was the easiest region to recover followed by trnH‐psbA, and other studies also encountered difficulties in the recovery of matK and ITS sequences (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011). The sequence recovery rate in our study was higher than that of some other studies, but it is important to note that we dedicated additional effort to re‐extracting DNA and retrying PCR for DNA samples that were suspected to be contaminated with foreign plant or fungal material.

4.2. Species resolution

The gymnosperms in this study were all distinguished using any of the four DNA barcodes. This is not surprising given that we had six genera each with a single species in our plot, which spanned three families in the order Pinales (Supporting Information Table S1). In angiosperms, the greater sampling of multiple species per genus led to lower overall discrimination. The chloroplast gene rbcL resolved 80.73% of all angiosperm species in our plot (Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1) whereas for matK the species resolution was 84.24%. Using two barcodes together provided slightly increased discrimination, with maximal discrimination being achieved using all four barcodes in combination (90.21%). For the two barcode combinations, RI performed best with 88.60% species resolution, marginally higher than RM (86.60%) and RP (86.01%). Adding trnH‐psbA and ITS region to the standard core barcode RM did not significantly increase the level of overall total species discrimination, however, the two supplemental barcodes did increase species discrimination in genera with three and four species (Figure 2).

Table 3 provides a summary of levels of species discrimination success from different floristic barcoding studies at scales that range from forest plots to regional floras. A clear signal is apparent that levels of species discrimination are lower at greater geographical scales (e.g. regional floristic barcoding projects show lower discrimination success than forest plot assessments). This is attributable to increasing the complexity of the problem (more species to discriminate among, at larger spatial scales) and increasing the likelihood of detecting intraspecific variants which may disrupt the apparent species‐level monophyly found in more geographically restricted sample sets.

Table 3.

Comparison of species discrimination in this study with those in previous studies for forest plots and floristic regions using DNA barcodes

Study site Area Climate Plants Species/genera Samples/species DNA barcodes Species resolution (%) Reference
Yulong Mountain FDP, Yunan, China 25 ha Subalpine temperate Woody and herbaceous 201/135 = 1.49 491/201 = 2.44 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA, ITS 90 In this study
Wytham‐Woods, UK 18 ha Temperate Trees 8/8 = 1 8/8 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA, ITS 100 Pei et al. (2015)
Wabikon‐Lake, North America 25.6 ha Temperate Trees 10/8 = 1.25 10/10 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 100 Pei et al. (2015)
SERC, North America 16 ha Temperate Trees 16/12 = 1.33 16/16 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 93 Pei et al. (2015)
Changbaishan FDP, Jilin, China 20 ha Temperate Trees 14/9 = 1.56 14/14 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 92 Pei et al. (2015)
SCBI FDP, America 25.6 ha Temperate Trees 35/20 = 1.75 35/35 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 97 Pei et al. (2015)
Gutianshan FDP, Zhejiang, China 20 ha Subtropical Trees 91/57 = 1.60 91/91 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 89 Pei et al. (2015)
Dinghushan FDP, Guangdong, China 20 ha Subtropical Trees 135/85 = 1.59 135/135 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 91 Pei et al. (2015)
Fushan FDP, Taiwan, China 25 ha Subtropical Trees 69/44 = 1.57 69/69 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 85 Pei et al. (2015)
Lienhuachih FDP, Taiwan, China 25 ha Subtropical Trees 96/56 = 1.71 96/96 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 87 Pei et al. (2015)
Luquillo FDP, New Guinea 16 ha Tropical Trees 104/79 = 1.32 104/104 = 1 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 92 Pei et al. (2015)
BCI FDP, Panama 50 ha Tropical Trees 296/181 = 1.64 1035/296 = 3.50 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 98 Kress et al. (2009)
Dinghushan nature reserve, Guangdong, China 1,133 ha Subtropical Trees 531/260 = 2.04 971/531 = 1.83 rbcL, matK, ITS 94 Liu et al. (2015)
Ailaoshan nature reserve, Yunnan, China 34,483 ha Subtropical Trees 204/111 = 1.84 525/204 = 2.57 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA, ITS 76 Lu, Ci, Yang and Li (2013)
Xishuangbanna nature reserve, Yunnan, China — Tropical Trees 655/259 = 2.53 2052/655 = 3.13 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA, ITS 60.7 Huang et al. (2015)
Ontario, Canada 348 ha Temperate Vascular plants 436/296 = 1.47 513/436 = 1.18 rbcL, matK, trnH‐psbA 95 Burgess et al. (2011)
Churchill, Canada 20,000 ha Arctic Vascular plants 312/147 = 2.12 900/312 = 2.88 rbcL, matK, ITS2 69 Kuzmina et al. (2012)
Canadian Arctic — Arctic Vascular plants 490/178 = 2.75 2644/490 = 5.40 rbcL, matK 56 Saarela et al. (2013)
Wales, UK 2 m ha Temperate Seed plants 1143/455 = 2.51 4272/1143 = 3.74 rbcL, matK 74.3 De Vere et al. (2012)
Open in a new tab

Comparing directly among forest plot DNA barcoding studies, based on the same barcode combination of rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA, the percentage of species discriminated is significantly negative correlated with the species‐to‐genera ratio (R 2 = 0.731, p < 0.001; Supporting Information Figure S2). Pei et al. (2015) also noted that species resolution rates tend to be lower with higher numbers of closely related species based on their study of DNA barcoding tree species in 13 global CTFS‐ForestGEO plots. The level of species discrimination of woody species in our plot based on rbcL + matK + trnH‐psbA (74.24%) is much lower than that of other plot studies (see Table 3 and Pei et al., 2015). The higher species‐to‐genera ratio of woody plants in our plot might explain the lower level of species discrimination. Compared to Pei et al. (2015) our high elevation site had a higher species‐to‐genera ratio for woody plants than 11 of their 13 plots. It is also important to note that some other studies sampled only one individual per species and based species discrimination on “non‐identical sequences between species.” This obviously can lead to an increased apparent rate of species discrimination due to an under sampling of sequence variation within a species. In our study, two to six samples were selected for each species.

4.3. Life form and species resolution

Despite their being twice as many herbaceous species (N = 129) in our plot than woody angiosperms (N = 66), species discrimination rates of herbaceous plants were much higher (84.92% to 97.66%) than that of woody plants (65.63%–74.24%; Supporting Information Table S4; Figure 1b). matK showed the greatest difference in species discrimination between these two groups of taxa, followed by barcode combinations that included the matK and ITS regions: differences between herbaceous plants and woody plants were much less pronounced for rbcL and trnH‐psbA. A higher species‐to‐genus ratio (SGR) for woody plants (1.65) compared to that of herbaceous plants (1.43) might be one of the reasons for lower species resolution rates among woody plants at our study site. Moreover, the slower substitution rates of woody plants results in increased time required for woody plants to accumulate sequence variation detectable by DNA barcodes (Smith & Donoghue, 2008). Cotoneaster, Acer, Salix, Sorbus, and Rhododendron were the major sources of resolution failures for woody species (Supporting Information Figure S1). Most of these genera are well known for hybridization and this may also contribute to low discrimination success—all of these genera showed at least some examples of highly similar sequences shared among species. For example, none of the three species of Cotoneaster were successfully identified in our plot. The Himalayas and the adjacent mountains of southwestern China are known to be the diversity center of this genus (Fryer & Hylmö, 2009). Widespread polyploidization and hybridization demonstrated by former studies (Fryer & Hylmö, 2009; Li et al., 2014; Li et al. 2017) help explained the inefficiency of DNA barcodes in discriminating species in this genus. DNA barcodes also did not resolve any of the four species of Salix in our study. It is known that Salix may have undergone repeated plastid capture events, widespread hybridization and dispersal and trans‐species selective sweeps that resulted in a general lack of haplotype variation for a number of standard coding and non‐coding barcode regions of the chloroplast genome (Percy et al., 2014). Similarly, the low species resolution of the four‐species genera Acer and Sorbus here may also result from the hybridization (Han et al., 2016; Li, Ohi‐Toma et al. 2017). Rhododendron may have undergone recent radiations and hybridization events in the mountain regions of Southwest China (Yan et al., 2015). Even though only five species coexist in our plot, and their morphological differences are clear, only one species was resolved.

Not all of the woody species showed low discrimination success. In particular, all of the species in the plot of some shrubby woody genera (e.g. Ribes—2 species, Euonymus—3 species, Berberis—3 species, Lonicera—5 species) were resolved by our DNA barcodes. For example, five species of Lonicera in our plot belong to distinct subsections (Hsu & Wang, 1988) with divergent relationships, thus all the species were successfully identified (inflating our discrimination success for genera with 5 species). Further sampling is required to assess whether there is a generalization here, but these data do suggest that it would be worthwhile exploring whether the association between generation time and discrimination success that is evident for herbaceous plants versus woody plants, also holds, in general, when comparing woody shrubs versus trees. The shorter time to first flowering in shrubs might be expected to lead, on average, to greater discrimination success than for more “tree‐like” woody plants whose generation time (in the sense of time to first flowering) is likely to be longer.

5. CONCLUSION

Our study represents one of the first applications of DNA barcoding in a subalpine forest dynamics plot. It is also one the first attempts to utilize DNA barcodes to identify both herbaceous and woody species in a plant community in the Himalya–Hengduan Mountains Region, one of the most diverse temperate floras of the world (Xing & Ree, 2017). The combination of rbcL and ITS, as well as the combination of rbcL and matK provided relatively high species discrimination among subalpine seed plants, although the supplemental barcodes trnH‐psbA and ITS increase discrimination in genera where there are more closely related species. Based on comparisons with other floristic barcoding studies, we found that level of species discrimination was strongly negatively correlated with the number of species per genus. Our study also provides a phylogenetic framework for the study of community assembly and comparative biology in this high‐elevation habitat, which has the potential to provide insights in evolutionary mechanisms underlying species coexistence in subalpine temperate forests.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

L.‐M.G. and D.‐Z.L. designed the study; S.‐L.T., Y.‐H.L. and K.X collected the plant samples; S.‐L.T. performed the molecular experiment; S.‐L.T. and Y.‐H.L. conducted the data analysis. S.‐L.T. and K.S. B. wrote the manuscript, P.M.H., L.‐M.G., D.‐Z.L. and Y.‐H.L. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final version of the text.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

DNA barcode sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MH116007‐MH117823, Supporting Information Table S6).

Supporting information

 

Click here for additional data file. (808.5KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Hua Huang, Detuan Liu, and Zhifa Chen from the Lijiang Botanical Garden for their help when we were collecting samples in the forest dynamics plot. We thank Junbo Yang, Jing Yang, Zhirong Zhang, Wenbin Yuan, and Jixiong Yang from the molecular biology laboratory of the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species of China for technical assistance. We also thank Profs. Xiwen Li and Hua Peng, Drs. Yousheng Chen, Jie Cai, Shudong Zhang, Zehuan Wang, Chunlei Xiang, Xiangguang Ma, Jiahui Chen, Yaping Chen, Zengyuan Wu, Liqiong Jiang, Guojin Zhang, Zhongshuai Zhang, Zhikun Wu, Detuan Liu, and other experts of plant taxonomy for the identification of specimens. This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the Large‐scale Scientific Facilities of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017‐LSF‐GBOWS‐02), and the Program of Science and Technology Talents Training of Yunnan Province (2017HA014).

Tan S‐L, Luo Y‐H, Hollingsworth PM, et al. DNA barcoding herbaceous and woody plant species at a subalpine forest dynamics plot in Southwest China. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:7195–7205. 10.1002/ece3.4254

Contributor Information

De‐Zhu Li, Email: dzl@mail.kib.ac.cn.

Lian‐Ming Gao, Email: gaolm@mail.kib.ac.cn.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson‐Teixeira, K. J. , Davies, S. J. , Bennett, A. C. , Gonzalez‐Akre, E. B. , Muller‐Landau, H. C. , Wright, S. J. , … Zimmerman, J. (2015). CTFS‐ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Global Change Biology, 21, 528–549. 10.1111/gcb.12712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azani, N. , Babineau, M. , Bailey, C. D. , Banks, H. , Barbosa, A. R. , Pinto, R. B. , … Zimmerman, E. (2017). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon, 66, 44–77. 10.12705/661.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin, B. G. , Sanderson, M. J. , Porter, J. M. , Wojciechowski, M. F. , Campbell, C. S. , & Donoghue, M. J. (1995). The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 82, 247–277. 10.2307/2399880 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, K. L. , de Vere, N. , Keller, A. , Richardson, R. T. , Gous, A. , Burgess, K. S. , & Brosi, B. J. (2016). Pollen DNA barcoding: Current applications and future prospects. Genome, 59, 629–640. 10.1139/gen-2015-0200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burgess, K. S. , Fazekas, A. J. , Kesanakurti, P. R. , Graham, S. W. , Husband, B. C. , Newmaster, S. G. , … Barrett, S. C. H. (2011). Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL plus matK DNA barcode. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 333–340. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00092.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chase, M. W. , Soltis, D. E. , Olmstead, R. G. , Morgan, D. , Les, D. H. , Mishler, B. D. , … Albert, V. A. (1993). Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL . Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 80, 528–580. 10.2307/2399846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Vere, N. , Rich, T. C. G. , Ford, C. R. , Trinder, S. A. , Long, C. , Moore, C. W. , … Wilkinson, M. J. (2012). DNA barcoding the native flowering plants and conifers of Wales. PLoS ONE, 7, e37945 10.1371/journal.pone.0037945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doyle, J. J. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erickson, D. L. , Jones, F. A. , Swenson, N. G. , Pei, N. , Bourg, N. A. , Chen, W. , … Kress, W. J. (2014). Comparative evolutionary diversity and phylogenetic structure across multiple forest dynamics plots: A mega‐phylogeny approach. Frontiers in Genetics, 5, 358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fazekas, A. J. , Burgess, K. S. , Kesanakurti, P. R. , Graham, S. W. , Newmaster, S. G. , Husband, B. C. , … Barrett, S. C. H. (2008). Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE, 3, e2802 10.1371/journal.pone.0002802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fryer, J. , & Hylmö, B. (2009). Cotoneasters: A comprehensive guide to shrubs for flowers, fruit, and foliage. London, UK: Timber Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao, L.‐M. , Liu, J. , Cai, J. , Yang, J.‐B. , Zhang, T. , & Li, D.‐Z. (2012). A synopsis of technical notes on the standards for plant DNA barcoding. Plant Diversity and Resourcues, 34, 592–606. 10.3724/SP.J.1143.2012.12138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilliam, F. S. (2007). The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience, 57, 845–858. 10.1641/B571007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilliam, F. S. (2014). The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199837656.001.0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzalez, M. A. , Baraloto, C. , Engel, J. , Mori, S. A. , Pétronelli, P. , Riéra, B. , … Chave, J. (2009). Identification of Amazonian trees with DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE, 4, e7483 10.1371/journal.pone.0007483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, Y.‐W. , Duan, D. , Ma, X.‐F. , Jia, Y. , Liu, Z.‐L. , Zhao, G.‐F. , & Li, Z.‐H. (2016). Efficient identification of the forest tree species in Aceraceae using DNA barcodes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrington, M. G. , Edwards, K. J. , Johnson, S. A. , Chase, M. W. , & Gadek, P. A. (2005). Phylogenetic inference in Sapindaceae sensu lato using plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences. Systematic Botany, 30, 366–382. 10.1600/0363644054223549 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hebert, P. D. N. , Stoeckle, M. Y. , Zemlak, T. S. , & Francis, C. M. (2004). Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. Plos Biology, 2, 1657–1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hollingsworth, P. M. , Forrest, L. L. , Spouge, J. L. , Hajibabaei, M. , Ratnasingham, S. , van der Bank, M. , … Little, D. P. (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12794–12797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsu, P. , & Wang, H. (1988). Lonicera In Hsu P., Wang H., & Hu J. (Eds.), Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae (pp. 153–257). Beijing, China: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, H. , Chen, Z.‐F. , Liu, D.‐T. , He, G.‐X. , He, R.‐H. , Li, D.‐Z. , & Xu, K. (2017). Species composition and community structure of the Yulongxueshan (Jade Dragon Snow Mountains) forest dynamics plot in the cold temperate spruce‐fir forest, Southwest China. Biodiversity Science, 25, 255–264. 10.17520/biods.2016274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, F. A. , Erickson, D. L. , Bernal, M. A. , Bermingham, E. , Kress, W. J. , Herre, E. A. , … Turner, B. L. (2011). The roots of diversity: Below ground species richness and rooting distributions in a tropical forest revealed by DNA barcodes and inverse modeling. PLoS ONE, 6, e24506 10.1371/journal.pone.0024506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kartzinel, T. R. , Chen, P. A. , Coverdale, T. C. , Erickson, D. L. , Kress, W. J. , Kuzmina, M. L. , … Pringle, R. M. (2015). DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 8019–8024. 10.1073/pnas.1503283112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kembel, S. W. , & Hubbell, S. P. (2006). The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. Ecology, 87, S86–S99. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[86:TPSOAN]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kesanakurti, P. R. , Fazekas, A. J. , Burgess, K. S. , Percy, D. M. , Newmaster, S. G. , Graham, S. W. , … Husband, B. C. (2011). Spatial patterns of plant diversity below‐ground as revealed by DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology, 20, 1289–1302. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04989.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kress, W. J. , & Erickson, D. L. (2007). A two‐locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non‐coding trnH‐psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE, 2, e508 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kress, W. J. , Erickson, D. L. , Jones, F. A. , Swenson, N. G. , Perez, R. , Sanjur, O. , & Bermingham, E. (2009). Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18621–18626. 10.1073/pnas.0909820106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kress, W. J. , Erickson, D. L. , Swenson, N. G. , Thompson, J. , Uriarte, M. , & Zimmerman, J. K. (2010). Advances in the use of DNA barcodes to build a community phylogeny for tropical trees in a Puerto Rican forest dynamics plot. PLoS ONE, 5, e15409 10.1371/journal.pone.0015409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kress, W. J. , Wurdack, K. J. , Zimmer, E. A. , Weigt, L. A. , & Janzen, D. H. (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 25. 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuzmina, M. L. , Johnson, K. L. , Barron, H. R. , & Hebert, P. D. N. (2012). Identification of the vascular plants of Churchill, Manitoba, using a DNA barcode library. BMC Ecology, 12, 25 10.1186/1472-6785-12-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lahaye, R. , van der Bank, M. , Bogarin, D. , Warner, J. , Pupulin, F. , Gigot, G. , … Savolainen, V. (2008). DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2923–2928. 10.1073/pnas.0709936105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, M.‐W. , Chen, S.‐F. , Zhou, R.‐C. , Fan, Q. , Li, F.‐F. , & Liao, W.‐B. (2017). Molecular evidence for natural hybridization between Cotoneaster dielsianus and C. glaucophyllus. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, F.‐F. , Fan, Q. , Li, Q.‐Y. , Chen, S.‐F. , Guo, W. , Cui, D.‐F. , & Liao, W.‐B. (2014). Molecular phylogeny of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae) inferred from nuclear ITS and multiple chloroplast sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300, 1533–1546. 10.1007/s00606-014-0980-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, D.‐Z. , Gao, L.‐M. , Li, H.‐T. , Wang, H. , Ge, X.‐J. , Liu, J.‐Q. , … Duan,G.‐W. (2011). Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 19641–19646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, M. , Ohi‐Toma, T. , Gao, Y.‐D. , Xu, B. , Zhu, Z.‐M. , Ju, W.‐B. , & Gao, X.‐F. (2017). Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of Sorbus sensu stricto (Rosaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 111, 76–86. 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, Z.‐F. , Ci, X.‐Q. , Li, L. , Li, H.‐W. , Conran, J. G. , & Li, J. (2017). DNA barcoding evaluation and implications for phylogenetic relationships in Lauraceae from China. PLoS ONE, 12, e0175788 10.1371/journal.pone.0175788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, D.‐T. , Li, W.‐S. , He, Y.‐l. , Chen, Z.‐F. , Huang, H. , Gao, F. , … Wu, Z.‐k. (2015). Resources evaluation of seed plants in Yulong Snow Mountain, Lijiang, Northwestern Yunnan. Plant Diversity and Resourcues, 37, 318–326. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, J. , Moeller, M. , Gao, L.‐M. , Zhang, D.‐Q. , & Li, D.‐Z. (2011). DNA barcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (Taxus L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 89–100. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02907.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, J. , Milne, R. I. , Moller, M. , Zhu, G.‐F. , Ye, L.‐J. , Luo, Y.‐H. , Yang, J.‐B. , & … Gao, L.‐M. (2018). Integrating a comprehensive DNA barcode reference library with a global map of yews (Taxus L.) for forensic identification. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10.1111/1755-0998.12903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, J. , Yan, H.‐F. , Newmaster, S. G. , Pei, N.‐C. , Ragupathy, S. , & Ge, X.‐J. (2015). The use of DNA barcoding as a tool for the conservation biogeography of subtropical forests in China. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 188–199. 10.1111/ddi.12276 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lu, M.‐M. , Ci, X.‐Q. , Yang, G.‐P. , & Li, J. (2013). DNA barcoding of subtropical forest trees: A study from Ailao Mountains Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China. Plant Diversity and Resourcues, 35, 733–741. [Google Scholar]
  42. Luo, Y.‐H. , Liu, J. , Tan, S.‐L. , Cadotte, M. W. , Wang, Y.‐H. , Xu, K. , … Gao, L.‐M. (2016a). Trait‐based community assembly along an elevational gradient in subalpine forests: Quantifying the roles of environmental factors in inter‐ and intraspecific variability. PLoS ONE, 11, e0155749 10.1371/journal.pone.0155749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, Y.‐H. , Liu, J. , Tan, S.‐L. , Cadotte, M. W. , Wang, Y.‐H. , Xu, K. , … Gao, L.‐M. (2016b). Trait variation and functional diversity maintenance of understory herbaceous species coexisting along an elevational gradient in Yulong Mountain, Southwest China. Plant Diversity, 38, 303–311. 10.1016/j.pld.2016.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Murphy, S. J. , Salpeter, K. , & Comita, L. S. (2016). Higher beta‐diversity observed for herbs over woody plants is driven by stronger habitat filtering in a tropical understory. Ecology, 97, 2074–2084. 10.1890/15-1801.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pei, N.‐C. , Erickson, D. L. , Chen, B.‐F. , Ge, X.‐J. , Mi, X.‐C. , Swenson, N. G. , … Kress, W. J. (2015). Closely‐related taxa influence woody species discrimination via DNA barcoding: Evidence from global forest dynamics plots. Scientific Reports, 5, 15127 10.1038/srep15127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pei, N.‐C. , Lian, J.‐Y. , Erickson, D. L. , Swenson, N. G. , Kress, W. J. , Ye, W.‐H. , & Ge, X.‐J. (2011). Exploring tree‐habitat associations in a Chinese subtropical forest plot using a molecular phylogeny generated from DNA barcode loci. PLoS ONE, 6, e21273 10.1371/journal.pone.0021273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Percy, D. M. , Argus, G. W. , Cronk, Q. C. , Fazekas, A. J. , Kesanakurti, P. R. , Burgess, K. S. , … Graham, S. W. (2014). Understanding the spectacular failure of DNA barcoding in willows (Salix): Does this result from a trans‐specific selective sweep? Molecular Ecology, 23, 4737–4756. 10.1111/mec.12837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  49. Saarela, J. M. , Sokoloff, P. C. , Gillespie, L. J , Consaul, L. L. , Bull, R. D. (2013). DNA barcoding the Canadian Arctic flora: core plastid barcodes (rbcL plus matK) for 490 vascular plant species. PLoS ONE, 8, e77982. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith, S. A. , & Donoghue, M. J. (2008). Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science, 322, 86–89. 10.1126/science.1163197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Taberlet, P. , Coissac, E. , Pompanon, F. , Brochmann, C. , & Willerslev, E. (2012). Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2045–2050. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Thrippleton, T. , Bugmann, H. , Kramer‐Priewasser, K. , & Snell, R. S. (2016). Herbaceous understorey: An overlooked player in forest landscape dynamics? Ecosystems, 19, 1240–1254. 10.1007/s10021-016-9999-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Valentini, A. , Pompanon, F. , & Taberlet, P. (2009). DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 110–117. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vamosi, J. C. , Gong, Y. B. , Adamowicz, S. J. , & Packer, L. (2017). Forecasting pollination declines through DNA barcoding: The potential contributions of macroecological and macroevolutionary scales of inquiry. New Phytologist, 214, 11–18. 10.1111/nph.14356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, Z.‐H. , Tang, Z.‐Y. , & Fang, J.‐Y. (2007). Altitudinal patterns of seed plant richness in the Gaoligong Mountains, south‐east Tibet, China. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 845–854. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00335.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Webb, C. O. (2000). Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: An example for rain forest trees. American Naturalist, 156, 145–155. 10.1086/303378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Xing, Y.‐W. , & Ree, R. H. (2017). Uplift‐driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E3444–E3451. 10.1073/pnas.1616063114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu, S.‐Z. , Li, D.‐Z. , Li, J.‐W. , Xiang, X.‐G. , Jin, W.‐T. , Huang, W.‐C. , … Huang, L.‐Q. (2015). Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from mainland Asia. PLoS ONE, 10, e0115168 10.1371/journal.pone.0115168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yan, L.‐J. , Liu, J. , Möller, M. , Zhang, L. , Zhang, X.‐M. , Li, D.‐Z. , & Gao, L.‐M. (2015). DNA barcoding of Rhododendron (Ericaceae), the largest Chinese plant genus in biodiversity hotspots of the Himalaya‐Hengduan Mountains. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 932–944. 10.1111/1755-0998.12353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, J. , Zhang, G.‐C. , Ci, X. , Swenson, N. G. , Cao, M. , Sha, L.‐Q. , … Lin, L.‐X. (2014). Functional and phylogenetic assembly in a Chinese tropical tree community across size classes, spatial scales and habitats. Functional Ecology, 28, 520–529. 10.1111/1365-2435.12176 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yoccoz, N. G. , Bråthen, K. A. , Gielly, L. , Haile, J. , Edwards, M. E. , Goslar, T. , … Taberlet, P. (2012). DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3647–3655. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05545.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

Click here for additional data file. (808.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

DNA barcode sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MH116007‐MH117823, Supporting Information Table S6).

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES