Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Obes. 2016 May 27;12(3):e24–e27. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12141

Two Year Follow-Up of a Primary Care-Based Intervention to Prevent and Manage Childhood Obesity: The High Five for Kids Study

Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman 1, Elsie M Taveras 2, Steven L Gortmaker 3, Katherine H Hohman 4, Christine M Horan 2, Ken P Kleinman 1, Kathleen Mitchell 5, Sarah Price 2, Lisa A Prosser 6, Matthew W Gillman 1
PMCID: PMC6067009  NIHMSID: NIHMS808420  PMID: 27231236

Abstract

We examined 2-year changes in age- and sex-specific BMI z-scores and obesity-related behaviors among 441 of the 475 originally recruited participants in High Five for Kids, a cluster randomized controlled trial in 10 pediatric practices. The intervention included a more intensive 1-year intervention period (4 in-person visits and 2 phone calls) followed by a less intensive 1-year maintenance period (2 in-person visits) among children who were overweight or obese and age 2–6 years at enrollment. The five intervention practices restructured care to manage these children including motivational interviewing and educational modules targeting television viewing and intakes of fast food and sugar sweetened beverages. After 2 years, compared with usual care, intervention participants had similar changes in BMI z-scores (−0.04 units; 95% CI −0.14, 0.06), television viewing (−0.20 hours/day; −0.49 to 0.09), and intakes of fast food (−0.09 servings/week; −0.34 to 0.17) and sugar sweetened beverages (−0.26 servings/day; −0.67 to 0.14). High Five for Kids, a primarily clinical-based intervention, did not affect BMI z-scores or obesity-related behaviors after 2 years.

Background

In the United States in 2011–2012, approximately 14.4% of children age 2–5 years were overweight (age- and sex-specific BMI in the 85th to <95th percentile) and 8.4% were obese (BMI ≥95th percentile).1 Most childhood obesity is incident by the age of 5 years,2 making prevention in the preschool years a priority.

Obesity prevention interventions in primary care settings targeting preschool-age children may be beneficial because children of this age visit their primary care clinicians frequently for routine medical care; parents have more control over their children’s health-related behaviors; and these behaviors may be more malleable.

High Five for Kids was a primary care-based obesity intervention among children age 2–6 years. The intervention consisted of a more intensive 1-year intervention period followed by a less intensive 1-year maintenance period. After 1 year, we reported that the intervention did not reduce BMI z-scores (−0.05 units; 95% CI −0.14, 0.04) or intakes of fast food and sugar sweetened beverages, but was effective in reducing television viewing (−0.36 hours/day; 95% CI, −0.64 to −0.09).3 The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the intervention after the planned 2-year intervention period.

Methods

High Five for Kids was a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce obesity in 10 pediatric practices (5 intervention, 5 usual care) of Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, a multisite group practice in Massachusetts.3 We enrolled 271 intervention and 204 usual care children age 2–6 years with BMI ≥95th percentile, or 85th to <95th percentile if at least 1 parent was overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2); 253 intervention and 192 usual care children had 1-year outcomes; 249 intervention (93% of those enrolled) and 192 usual care (93% of those enrolled) children had 2-year outcomes. The overarching model for this intervention was the Chronic Care Model,4 which posits that changes in primary care to produce functional patient outcomes require changes for all members of the practice team. Intervention practices received primary care restructuring, and families received motivational interviewing by clinicians and educational modules targeting television viewing and intakes of fast food and sugar sweetened beverages. During the 1-year intervention period, we aimed for participants to complete 4 in-person visits and 2 phone calls with clinicians. During the subsequent 1-year maintenance period, we aimed for participants to complete 2 in-person intervention visits. Details of the recruitment, randomization, and the intervention through 1 year have been described elsewhere.3 The institutional review board of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care approved all study procedures.

Our primary outcome was change in BMI z-scores from baseline to 2 years. During routine clinical visits, medical assistants measured children’s weight and height, and we calculated age- and sex-specific BMI z-scores using US national reference data.5 Secondary outcomes were changes in duration of television viewing and intakes of fast food and sugar sweetened beverages from baseline to 2 years. We used validated questions to assess duration of television viewing and intakes of fast food and sugar sweetened beverages.68 We first examined baseline distributions of child and parent characteristics by intervention status. In intent-to-treat analyses, we used unadjusted and multivariable adjusted linear regression models to estimate differences from baseline to 2 years between the intervention and usual care groups. We adjusted for child age, sex, and race/ethnicity; parent education and overweight/obesity status at baseline; household income; and time elapsed from baseline to follow-up visit. In all models, we performed generalized linear mixed models that accounted for clustering by practices.

Results

At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 4.9 (1.2) years. Mean (SD) BMI was 19.2 (2.6) among intervention children and 19.1 (2.0) among usual care children and BMI z-scores were 1.88 (0.69) and 1.82 (0.56), respectively. Children in intervention clinics had a higher percent of racial/ethnic minorities (53% v. 30%), an obese parent (61% v. 44%), and lived in lower-income households (35% v. 20% ≤$50,000/year). There were no group differences at baseline in health behaviors. (Table 1) Among the 253 intervention participants, 62% of participants completed 0 visits, 17% completed 1 visit, and 21% completed 2 of the 2 intervention visits during the 1-year maintenance period.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and behaviors of participants in the High Five for Kids Study Overall and by Intervention Assignment

Overall Intervention Usual Care
n=445 n=253 n=192
Mean (SD) or N (%)
Child characteristics
Age, y 4.9 (1.2) 4.8 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1)
Sex, %
 Female 215 (48.3) 121 (47.8) 94 (49.0)
 Male 230 (51.7) 132 (52.2) 98 (51.0)
Race/ethnicity, %
 White 252 (56.6) 118 (46.6) 134 (69.8)
 Black 84 (18.9) 70 (27.7) 14 (7.3)
 Latino 74 (16.6) 48 (19.0) 26 (13.5)
 Other 35 (7.9) 17 (6.7) 18 (9.4)
BMI kg/m2 19.2 (2.3) 19.2 (2.6) 19.1 (2.0)
BMI z-score 1.85 (0.63) 1.88 (0.69) 1.82 (0.56)
BMI category, %
 85th to <95th percentile 195 (43.8) 118 (46.6) 77 (40.1)
 ≥95th percentile 250 (56.2) 135 (53.4) 115 (59.9)
Time elapsed from baseline to 2 year follow-up, months 26.1 (2.3) 26.3 (2.4) 25.9 (2.1)
Child health behaviors
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake, servings/day 2.1 (1.7) 2.3 (1.8) 2.0 (1.5)
Fast food consumption, servings/week 1.1 (0.9) 1.2 (0.9) 1.1 (0.9)
Total TV and video viewing, hours/day 2.6 (1.5) 2.7 (1.6) 2.4 (1.3)
Parent and household characteristics
Parent overweight/obesity status, %
 Normal weight (BMI <25) 17 (3.8) 8 (3.2) 9 (4.7)
 Overweight (BMI 25 to <30) 189 (42.6) 90 (35.7) 99 (51.6)
 Obese (BMI ≥30) 238 (53.6) 154 (61.1) 84 (43.8)
Parent education, %
 Some college or below 171 (38.4) 106 (41.9) 65 (33.9)
 College graduate 274 (61.6) 147 (58.1) 127 (66.1)
Annual household Income, %
 <$50,000 126 (28.7) 88 (35.5) 38 (19.9)
 ≥$50,000 313 (71.3) 160 (64.5) 153 (80.1)
Marital status, %
 Not married 107 (24.0) 66 (26.1) 41 (21.4)
 Married 338 (76.0) 187 (73.9) 151 (78.6)

At 2 years follow-up, the mean (SD) age of participants was 7.0 (1.2) years. BMI had increased by a mean of 1.1 kg/m2 in the intervention group and 1.2 kg/m2 in the usual care group corresponding to decreases in BMI z-scores in both groups (−0.20 and −0.18, respectively). In adjusted models, compared with usual care, participants in intervention clinics had similar changes in BMI z-scores (−0.04 units; 95% CI −0.14, 0.06), television viewing (−0.20 hours/day; 95% CI −0.49 to 0.09), and intakes of fast food (−0.09 servings/week; 95% CI −0.34 to 0.17) and sugar sweetened beverages (−0.26 serving/day; 95% CI −0.67 to 0.14) relative to participants in usual care clinics. (Table 2) We did not observe any differences in outcomes according to subgroups defined by child age, sex or race/ethnicity, by parent education or overweight/obesity status, or by household income.

Table 2.

Change in BMI and health behaviors from baseline to 2 years by intervention assignment

Baseline 2 Years Change Unadjusted differencea Adjusted differenceb
Mean (SD) β (95% CI)
BMI z-score
 Intervention 1.88 (0.69) 1.67 (0.67) −0.20 (0.51) −0.02 (−0.12, 0.07) −0.04 (−0.14, 0.06)
 Usual care 1.82 (0.56) 1.65 (0.60) −0.18 (0.47)
BMI
 Intervention 19.2 (2.6) 20.3 (3.6) 1.11 (1.99) −0.07 (−0.57, 0.43) −0.08 (−0.53, 0.36)
 Usual care 19.1 (2.0) 20.4 (2.9) 1.22 (1.82)
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake, servings/d
 Intervention 2.25 (1.77) 1.62 (1.38) −0.61 (1.71) −0.26 (−0.64, 0.12) −0.26 (−0.67, 0.14)
 Usual care 1.95 (1.54) 1.65 (1.28) −0.31 (1.22)
Fast food consumption, servings/wk
 Intervention 1.16 (0.93) 0.94 (0.72) −0.23 (0.90) −0.13 (−0.37, 0.12) −0.09 (−0.34, 0.17)
 Usual care 1.13 (0.90) 1.05 (0.83) −0.08 (0.97)
Total TV and video viewing, h/d
 Intervention 2.67 (1.58) 2.17 (1.14) −0.50 (1.54) −0.27 (−0.54, 0.00) −0.20 (−0.49, 0.09)
 Usual care 2.44 (1.33) 2.21 (1.16) −0.23 (1.22)
a

Corrected for clustering within practice

b

Adjusted for child age, sex, and race/ethnicity; parent education and overweight/obesity status at baseline; household income; and time elapsed from baseline to 2-year follow-up visit

Discussion

In summary, after 2 years, the High Five for Kids intervention did not appreciably improve BMI z-scores or obesity-related behaviors compared with children not receiving the intervention. At least two factors could have contributed to the lack of intervention effect on BMI z-scores. First, our intervention involved only the primary care setting and not children’s communities or environment. It is possible that primary care–based interventions alone will not effect change in BMI z-scores but could complement and potentially enhance more comprehensive efforts in multiple settings. Second, adherence to intervention activities was low during the 1-year maintenance period. It is possible that the intervention “dose” delivered during the 1-year maintenance period was not sufficient in effecting changes in BMI z-scores. However, even at 1 year, High Five for Kids did not show an effect on BMI z-scores.3 Obesity prevention interventions in children may require more contact hours and/or additional settings to be effective.

Acknowledgments

NIH grant number: R01 HD 050966

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Childhood and Adult Obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gillman MW, Ludwig DS. How Early Should Obesity Prevention Start? N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2173–2175. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1310577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taveras EM, Gortmaker SL, Hohman KH, Horan CM, Kleinman KP, Mitchell K, Price S, Prosser LA, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the High Five for Kids study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):714–22. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1(1):2–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Center for Health Statistics. CDC Growth Charts, United States. 2000 < http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/>.
  • 6.Baker PC, Keck CK, Mott FL, Quinlan SV. Rev ed Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research. Ohio State University; 1993. NLSY Child Handbook: A Guide to the 1986–90 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Child Data. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blum RE, Wei EK, Rockett HR, Langeliers JD, Leppert J, Gardner JD, Colditz GA. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Native American and Caucasian children 1 to 5 years of age. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3(3):167–172. doi: 10.1023/a:1022350023163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taveras EM, Berkey CS, Rifas-Shiman SL, Ludwig DS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Colditz GA, Gillman MW. Association of consumption of fried food away from home with body mass index and diet quality in older children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;116(4):e518–e524. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wen X, Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Sherry B, Kleinman K, Taveras EM. Decreasing prevalence of obesity among young children in Massachusetts from 2004 to 2008. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):823–31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES