Abstract
Background
The World Health Organization recommends HIV testing is included in routine screening tests for all pregnant women in order to prevent mother-to-child-transmission of HIV and reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.
Objectives
To assess the proportion of women approached and tested for HIV at delivery and factors associated with non-testing at the maternity ward of the Simão Mendes National Hospital (HNSM) in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study among women presenting for delivery from June 2008 until May 2013. During the study period, national policy included opt-out HIV-testing at delivery. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the association of maternal characteristics with HIV testing. Time trends were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test.
Results
Seventy-seven percent (24,217/31,443) of women presenting for delivery were counselled regarding PMTCT, of whom 99.6% (24,107/24,217) proceeded with HIV testing. The provision of opt-out HIV testing at labour increased from 38.1% (1,514/3973) in 2008 to 95.7% (2,021/2,113) in 2013, p<0.001. There were four distinct periods (two or more consecutive calendar months) when less than 50% of women delivering at HNSM were tested. Periods of political instability were significantly associated with not testing for HIV (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] 1.79; 95% CI 1.73–1.84), as was a lower educational status (APR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00–1.10), admission during evenings/nights (APR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.09) and on Sundays (APR 1.14; 95% CI 1.07–1.22) and Mondays (APR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05–1.19).
Conclusions
Rapid scale-up of PMTCT HIV testing services and high testing coverage was possible in this resource-limited setting but suffered from regular interruptions, most likely because of test stock-outs. Establishing proper stock management systems and back-up plans for periods of political instability is required to ensure the maintenance of health system core functions and increase health system resilience.
Introduction
Prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV through testing and the provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to HIV-positive women has proven an effective strategy to combat the HIV epidemic. In 2014, there were an estimated 220,000 cases of vertical transmission worldwide, which was a decline of 58% when compared to estimates from the year 2000 [1].
A cornerstone of PMTCT is the provision of uninterrupted HIV testing and counselling during pregnancy, as it provides a vital entry point to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services [2]. However, only 44% of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries were tested for HIV in 2013 [3] and many women presenting for labour remain unaware of their HIV status [4, 5]. While 76% of women in West and Central Africa accessed skilled antenatal care at least once, only half (52%) received the recommended minimum of four antenatal visits between 2010 and 2015 [6]. Studies have shown that provider initiated (opt-out) HIV testing of pregnant women resulted in a significantly higher coverage, compared with patient-initiated (opt-in) testing [7]. In settings with inadequate antenatal care or poor attendance, opt-out HIV testing at delivery may represent the only opportunity for HIV testing for many women [8].
Numerous supply-side barriers to the optimal uptake of PMTCT occur within the health care system, including distance to testing facilities [9], unskilled antenatal care attendants [10], lack of counselling rooms, inadequate staff training [11], inadequate time or resources to deliver PMTCT interventions and irregular supply of testing kits [12, 13]. HIV-test supply interruptions are likely caused by mechanisms similar to interruptions of HIV-drug supply and other essential health products. These include forecasting supply challenges such natural disasters and political upheaval, suboptimal management of stock information and supply chains and unreliable infrastructure [13–16].
Guinea-Bissau in West Africa has 1.8 million inhabitants, of whom 400,000 reside in the capital Bissau [17]. Since its independence in 1974, the country has experienced significant political upheaval, including a civil war in 1999 and five military coups during the period 2002–2012 [18, 19]. According to the Fragile State Index, Guinea-Bissau is currently ranked number 17 out of 178 nations based on its level of instability [20]. The political instability in the country has impeded development despite national and international efforts [21, 22], and health programmes are frequently suspended or delayed [23, 24].
An estimated 6.7% of the population in Guinea-Bissau is infected with HIV [25]. In 2012, an estimated 5,900 children (<15 years) were living with HIV in the country [26]. HIV testing and treatment has been available at selected antenatal clinics in Bissau since 2002 [27]. However, Guinea-Bissau first engaged in scaling-up antiretroviral therapy in 2005. In 2007, efforts were boosted to increase antenatal counselling, testing, and treatment at public health centres due to further support from the Brazilian Government and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria [28]. Despite these efforts, a high proportion of women presenting for delivery in the capital had not received antenatal counselling and testing, and thus, the Government initiated opt-out counselling and testing at the main maternity hospital, at the time of delivery, in order to identify HIV-infected women in need of care. Research from Guinea-Bissau has shown that 49% of HIV-infected patients presented with advanced disease (CD4 cell count below 200 cells/μL) and an additional one quarter were late presenters (CD4 cell count below 350 cells/μL), which underlines the need for intensified efforts to identify, enrol and retain HIV-infected individuals into care [29].
The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of women approached and tested for HIV around the time of delivery, as well as factors associated with not testing for HIV, using routine survey data collected throughout a five-year period at the maternity ward at the main National Hospital in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Materials and methods
Study setting
This study was conducted within the framework of the Bandim Health Project (BHP) (http://www.bandim.org), at the Simão Mendes National Hospital (HNSM) maternity ward in Bissau, the capital of Guinea-Bissau. This public facility is the principal provider of comprehensive emergency obstetric care in Guinea-Bissau. Opt-out HIV counselling and testing was offered to all women admitted to the maternity ward for the management of labour and delivery, miscarriage, birth before arrival or illness in pregnancy. HIV testing and ART was offered free of charge by the Guinean Ministry of Health, but women were required to pay a flat fee of 1500–2000 FCFA (~3–4 USD) for delivery services.
Study design and participants
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of opt-out HIV testing frequency and associated factors for not testing on data routinely collected through the BHP surveillance system from June 2008 until May 2013. All women presenting at the HNSM maternity ward for delivery or immediate postpartum care were considered eligible for participation. Hospital protocol required counselling and verbal informed consent before HIV testing for all women attending the HNSM maternity ward.
Data collection
The HNSM maternity ward maintains a data registration system in which basic socio-demographic data and clinical data are collected. Trained research assistants performed daily data cleaning and, by use of case report forms (CRFs), collected supplementary demographic and clinical information. The CRFs include information regarding age, ethnicity, place of residence, years of schooling, civil status, date of admission and discharge, number of previous pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes. In addition, midwives were trained to complete a short CRF as part of the counselling and testing routine, collecting data on patient-reported HIV testing earlier in the index pregnancy, and knowledge of serostatus and antiretroviral treatment were given when applicable. Midwives were paid an incentive of 500 FCFA (~1 USD) for each patient counselled, a scheme that was specifically set up to improve opt-out testing at delivery.
HIV testing
HIV screening was performed using the rapid test Determine® HIV-1/2 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, ILL, USA). To confirm infection and to discriminate between HIV sub-types, whole blood from women with positive and/or inconclusive screening results was subsequently tested with the SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 rapid test (Standard Diagnostics, Kyonggi-do, South Korea). Since June 2012, the rapid test First Response HIV Card 1–2.0 (PMC Medical, Mumbai, India) has also been used for HIV confirmation and HIV type discrimination.
Statistical methods
Maternity and HIV testing data were entered into password-secured databases (dBase 5.0, data Based Inc, Vestal, NY, USA; Microsoft Access 2007, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), and datasets were merged and analysed using Stata 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Pearson’s χ2 test was initially used to explore differences in demographic and birth-related characteristics by HIV test status (Not tested/Tested). Periods of low testing coverage were defined as when the proportion of women tested fell below 50% during a calendar month given national HIV test stock diaries were unavailable for the study period. To assess factors associated with not testing, univariate and multivariate modified Poisson regression models with robust error variances were used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) [30, 31]. The multivariate analysis was fitted with statistically significant covariates (p<0.05) from the univariate analysis using Wald’s test, as well as the age variable.
To explore the effect of political instability in Guinea-Bissau, based on the assumption that the impact of an event may have a delayed or sustained effect, we generated six dummy variables defining political instability as the period from the date of a major political event and the subsequent weeks. To select the most appropriate duration we performed a sensitivity analysis using estimates of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 week durations of political instability. Based on the results of our analysis, political instability in this study was defined as the period from the date of a major political event and the following four weeks. Missing values were excluded from the univariate and multivariate analysis, as no clear patterns of missing values were observed. Trend over time (calendar year) was determined using Pearson’s χ2 test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical considerations
The use of Government surveillance maternity data was approved by the National Ethical Committee in Guinea-Bissau (CNES-2010-018), and a separate ethical approval was obtained for the analysis of HIV testing data and its linkage with delivery data (CNES-2011-030). All data were effectively anonymized before they were accessed. Newly diagnosed HIV-infected women were initiated on antiretroviral treatment at birth and follow-up was organised prior to discharge from hospital.
Results
Participant characteristics
Between June 2008 and May 2013, a total of 31,443 women presented to the HNSM maternity ward for delivery, immediate postpartum care (born before arrival), or management of pregnancy-related complications. Seventy-seven percent (24,217/31,443) of women were approached and counselled, of whom 99.6% (24,107/24,217) were subsequently tested for HIV (110 women [0.4%] declined the test). The average total HIV prevalence (HIV-1, HIV-2 and dual infections) was 5.1% (1,232/24,107). Among those counselled and tested at delivery, only 46.6% (11,233/24,107) of women reported having been tested earlier in the index pregnancy, of whom 5.0% (566/11,233) were HIV positive. Previous test results for women not counselled at labour (n = 7,226) were unavailable.
The median age of women was 24 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20–29 years). The principle ethnic groups included Balanta (23%), Fula (22%) and Pepel (14%). Twenty-two percent of women (6,957/31,443) had no formal schooling, 54% (16,909/31,443) were in a monogamous marriage, and 37% (11,754/30,866) were primigravid (Table 1).
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women.
Study population N = 31,443 |
HIV tested | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | n(col%) | No (n = 7,336) n(col%) |
Yes (n = 24,107) n(col%) |
p-value | |
Age (years) | 0.171 | ||||
13–19 | 7,442(23.7) | 1,787(24.4) | 5,655(23.7) | ||
20–24 | 9,450(30.1) | 2,235(30.5) | 7,215(29.9) | ||
25–29 | 8,072(25.7) | 1,834(25.0) | 6,238(25.9) | ||
30+ | 6,479(20.6) | 1,480(20.2) | 4,999(20.7) | ||
Marital status | <0.001 | ||||
Single A | 9,139(29.1) | 2,187(29.8) | 6,952(28.8) | ||
Married-monogamous | 16,909(53.8) | 4,338(59.1) | 12,571(52.2) | ||
Married-polygamous | 5,395(17.2) | 811(11.1) | 4,584(19.0) | ||
Schooling (years) | <0.001 | ||||
None | 6,957(22.1) | 2,005(27.3) | 4,952(20.5) | ||
1–6 years | 7,655(24.4) | 1,861(25.4) | 5,794(24.0) | ||
7–12 years | 14,525(46.2) | 3,232(44.1) | 11,293(46.9) | ||
Missing | 2,306(7.3) | 238(3.2) | 2,068(8.6) | ||
Ethnic Group | 0.339 | ||||
Balanta | 7,158(22.8) | 1,682(22.9) | 5,476(22.7) | ||
Bijagos | 540(1.7) | 104(1.4) | 436(1.8) | ||
Felupe | 478(1.5) | 104(1.4) | 374(1.5) | ||
Fula | 6,915(22.0) | 1,653(22.5) | 5,262(21.8) | ||
Mancanha | 2,443(7.8) | 565(7.7) | 1,878(7.8) | ||
Mandinga | 3,269(10.4) | 784(10.7) | 2,485(10.3) | ||
Manjaco | 2,402(7.6) | 542(7.4) | 1,860(7.7) | ||
Mixta | 911(2.9) | 229(3.1) | 682(2.8) | ||
Pepel | 4,532(14.4) | 1,037(14.1) | 3,495(14.5) | ||
Saracule | 319(1.0) | 67(0.9) | 252(1.5) | ||
Others B | 2,447(7.8) | 561(7.7) | 1,886(7.8) | ||
Missing | 29(0.1) | 8(0.1) | 21(0.1) | ||
Parity C | 0.525 | ||||
1 | 11,754(37.4) | 2,788(38.0) | 8,966(37.2) | ||
2 | 7,200(22.9) | 1,666(22.7) | 5,534(23.0) | ||
≥3 | 11,866(37.7) | 2,730(37.2) | 9,136(37.9) | ||
Missing | 623(2.0) | 152(2.1) | 471(2.0) | ||
Week day of labour | <0.001 | ||||
Sunday | 4,547(14.5) | 1,142(15.6) | 3,405(14.1) | ||
Monday | 4,565(14.5) | 1,187(16.2) | 3,378(14.0) | ||
Tuesday | 4,377(13.9) | 976(13.3) | 3,401(14.1) | ||
Wednesday | 4,581(14.6) | 1,034(14.1) | 3,547(14.7) | ||
Thursday | 4,417(14.1) | 973(13.3) | 3,444(14.3) | ||
Friday | 4,451(14.2) | 1,008(13.7) | 3,443(14.3) | ||
Saturday | 4,505(14.3) | 1,016(13.9) | 3,489(14.5) | ||
Time presenting for labour | <0.001 | ||||
08–16 | 11,011(35.0) | 2,441(33.3) | 8,570(35.6) | ||
17–07 | 20,102(63.9) | 4,803(65.5) | 15,299(63.5) | ||
Missing | 330(1.1) | 92(1.3) | 238(1.0) | ||
Mode of delivery | 0.622 | ||||
Caesarean | 4,649(14.8) | 1,059(14.4) | 3,590(14.9) | ||
Vaginal | 26,753(85.1) | 6,267(85.4) | 20,486(85.0) | ||
Missing | 41(0.1) | 10(0.1) | 31(0.1) | ||
Political instability D | <0.001 | ||||
No | 27,699(88.1) | 6,151(83.9) | 21,548(89.4) | ||
Yes | 3,744(11.9) | 1,185(16.2) | 2,559(10.6) | ||
Year of testing | <0.001 | ||||
2008 (June-December) | 3,973(12.6) | 2,459(33.52) | 1,514(6.3) | ||
2009 | 6,704(21.3) | 1,903(25.9) | 4,801(19.9) | ||
2010 | 6,702(21.3) | 168(2.3) | 6,534(27.1) | ||
2011 | 6,254(19.9) | 2,353(32.1) | 3,901(16.2) | ||
2012 | 5,697(18.12) | 361(4.9) | 5,336(22.1) | ||
2013 (January-May) | 2,113(6.7) | 92(1.25) | 2,021(8.4) | ||
BHP study area | 0.193 | ||||
No | 24,899(79.2) | 5,862(79.9) | 19,037(79.0) | ||
Yes | 6,543(20.8) | 1,474(20.1) | 5,067(21.0) | ||
Missing | 1(0.0) | - | 1(100.0) |
Note. Abbreviation: BHP, Bandim health project demographic surveillance site.
A Includes divorced and widowed women.
B Ethnic groups or nationalities, each comprising less than 1% of the sample population (Cape Verdean, Senegalese, Guinean (Republic of Guinea), Balanta Mane, Mansoanca, Nalu, and Geba).
C Including index pregnancy.
D Date of political event + 4 weeks.
Testing coverage
There were four distinct periods of two or more consecutive calendar months during which less than 50% of women presenting at the HNSM were tested (total of 14 in 60 months): June 2008–July 2008, October 2008-Feburary 2009, July 2009 –August 2009, and March 2011 –July 2011. Two of these periods coincided with major events of political instability and one with major financial instability. During other periods, the average test coverage was 96% (16,499/17,153). The provision of counselling and testing during the study period is displayed in Fig 1.
Coverage of peripartum opt-out testing and counselling at childbirth increased from 38% (1,514/3973) in 2008 to 96% (2,021/2,113) in the first quarter of 2013, p<0.001. Testing coverage fell from 98% (6,534/6,702) in 2010 to 62% (3,901/6,254) in 2011 before stabilizing again at 94% (5,336/5,697) in 2012. There was a steady increase in the proportion of women testing for HIV antenatally (self-reported), from 25% (354/1,427) in 2008 to 89% (4,384/4,926) in 2012, with a decline to 81% (1,259/1,548) during the first two quarters of 2013, p<0.001 (Fig 2).
Duration of political instability
We performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the most appropriate duration of political instability. Our results showed an increase in the percentage of women not tested during political instability from 19.5% at 2 weeks to 31.7% at 4 weeks. No significant increase was observed between 4 and 7 weeks (S1 Table). We therefore chose 4 weeks as the appropriate duration of political instability in the univariate and multivariate analysis.
Factors associated with peripartum HIV testing
In the unadjusted analyses, factors associated with not testing for HIV included lower educational status (primary or below), presenting for labour on Sunday or Monday, and presenting for labour in the evening/night hours (Table 2). Conversely, single women and women in a polygamous marriage (having one or more co-wives) were more likely to test for HIV compared with women in a monogamous marriage. No associations were observed for age, parity or mode of delivery. Political instability was associated with not testing in the unadjusted analyses (crude prevalence ratio [CPR] 1.43; 95% CI 1.35–1.50).
Table 2. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios for not testing for HIV among pregnant women.
Variable | Crude PR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted PR (95% CI)E* | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | |||||
13–19 | 1 | 1 | |||
20–24 | 0.99(0.93–1.04) | 0.584 | 1.01(0.97–1.06) | 0.616 | |
25–29 | 0.95(0.89–1.00) | 0.057 | 1.01(0.96–1.07) | 0.603 | |
30+ | 0.95(0.90–1.01) | 0.105 | 1.04(0.98–1.10) | 0.183 | |
Marital status | |||||
Single A | 0.93(0.89–0.98) | 0.002 | 0.99(0.95–1.10) | 0.742 | |
Married-monogamous | 1 | 1 | |||
Married-polygamous | 0.59(0.55–0.63) | <0.001 | 0.78(0.73–0.83) | <0.001 | |
Schooling (years) | |||||
None | 1.30(1.23–1.36) | <0.001 | 1.05(1.00–1.10) | 0.035 | |
1–6 years | 1.09(1.04–1.15) | <0.001 | 1.06(1.02–1.11) | 0.007 | |
7–12 years | 1 | 1 | |||
Missing | - | ||||
Ethnic Group | |||||
Balanta | 1 | ||||
Bijagos | 0.82(0.69–0.98) | 0.028 | |||
Felupe | 0.93(0.78–1.10) | 0.389 | |||
Fula | 1.02(0.96–1.08) | 0.571 | |||
Mancanha | 0.98(0.91–1.07) | 0.709 | |||
Mandinga | 1.02(0.95–1.10) | 0.589 | |||
Manjaco | 0.96(0.88–1.05) | 0.350 | |||
Mixta | 1.07(0.95–1.21) | 0.269 | |||
Pepel | 0.97(0.91–1.04) | 0.443 | |||
Saracule | 0.89(0.72–1.11) | 0.310 | |||
OthersB | 0.98(0.90–1.06) | 0.564 | |||
Missing | - | ||||
Parity C | |||||
1 | 1 | ||||
2 | 0.98(0.93–1.03) | 0.361 | |||
≥3 | 0.97(0.93–1.02) | 0.196 | |||
Missing | - | ||||
Week day of labour | |||||
Sunday | 1.11(1.03–1.20) | 0.004 | 1.14(1.07–1.22) | <0.001 | |
Monday | 1.15(1.07–1.24) | <0.001 | 1.12(1.05–1.19) | 0.001 | |
Tuesday | 0.99(0.92–1.07) | 0.757 | 1.04(0.97–1.11) | 0.336 | |
Wednesday | 1 | 1 | |||
Thursday | 0.98(0.90–1.05) | 0.536 | 0.98(0.92–1.05) | 0.631 | |
Friday | 1.00(0.93–1.08) | 0.932 | 1.04(0.98–1.12) | 0.227 | |
Saturday | 1.00(0.93–1.08) | 0.983 | 1.00(0.93–1.07) | 0.905 | |
Time presenting for labour | |||||
08–16 | 1 | 1 | |||
17–07 | 1.08(1.03–1.13) | 0.001 | 1.05(1.01–1.09) | 0.012 | |
Missing | - | ||||
Mode of delivery | |||||
Caesarean | 1 | ||||
Vaginal | 1.03(0.97–1.09) | 0.338 | |||
Missing | - | ||||
Political instability D | |||||
No | 1 | 1 | |||
Yes | 1.43(1.35–1.50) | <0.001 | 1.79(1.73–1.84) | <0.001 | |
Year of testing | |||||
2008 (June-December) | 1 | 1 | |||
2009 | 045(0.44–0.48) | <0.001 | 0.51(0.48–0.53) | <0.001 | |
2010 | 0.04(0.04–0.05) | <0.001 | 0.04(0.04–0.05) | <0.001 | |
2011 | 0.61(0.58–0.63) | <0.001 | 0.69(0.66–0.72) | <0.001 | |
2012 | 0.10(0.09–0.11) | <0.001 | 0.11(0.10–0.13) | <0.001 | |
2013 (January-May) | 0.07(0.06–0.09) | <0.001 | 0.08(0.06–0.10) | <0.001 | |
BHP study area | |||||
No | 1.05(0.99–1.10) | 0.085 | |||
Yes | 1 | ||||
Missing | - |
Note. Abbreviations: PR, prevalence ratio. BHP, Bandim health project demographic surveillance site.
A Includes divorced and widowed women.
B Ethnic groups or nationalities, each comprising less than 1% of the sample population (Cape Verdean, Senegalese, Guinean (Republic of Guinea), Balanta Mane, Mansoanca, Nalu, and Geba).
C Including index pregnancy.
D Date of political event + 4 weeks (not including funding cuts).
E Adjusted prevalence ratio, model including variables with p < 0.05 and age by groups.
*An interaction term for political instability x calendar year is also included.
The multivariate model (n = 28,850) included age, marital status, schooling, political instability, calendar year, weekday and time of labour (Table 2). The adjusted model confirmed univariate findings regarding lower educational status, admission on Sundays or Mondays, and time of labour as significant risk factors for not testing, while polygamy associated with testing. In the adjusted analyses, political instability was also associated with an increased risk of not getting tested (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.79 (95% CI 1.73–1.84)).
Discussion
The present study assessed the proportion of women approached and tested for HIV at delivery as well as factors associated with HIV testing as a part of PMTCT services at the principal maternity ward in Guinea-Bissau. The data show that the overall provision of self-reported antenatal and opt-out HIV-testing as a part of PMTCT services improved significantly between 2008 and 2013. Nevertheless, almost a quarter of all women were not tested peripartum. While periods with stable, uninterrupted testing with high test uptake were observed, this study suggests that political and financial instability negatively affect the proportion of women tested for HIV.
Our study shows that a rapid scale-up of PMTCT services is possible. Research from other sub-Saharan African countries where opt-out testing is performed has shown that up to 94% of women test for HIV [7]. The low refusal rate in this study may support the high acceptability of opt-out testing observed in other countries [32–36]. However, qualitative research from Guinea-Bissau suggests that testing around the time of delivery may in some instances have been done without adequate informed consent, which may have contributed to the high testing rates observed in this study [37].
We found a steady increase in self-reported antenatal testing, which corresponds to reports by the Guinean HIV programme during the study period [38]. According to national figures from 2014, an estimated 68% of all pregnant women who were tested during antenatal visits received their results [39]. Despite these achievements, repeated periods of non-testing clearly affected the provision of PMTCT. The periods of low and inconsistent testing peripartum observed in this study may have contributed to the high estimated rates of HIV-infected children (22%-27%) born to seropositive mothers between 2011 and 2014 [39].
Interruptions of HIV treatment [28, 40] and test stock-outs have repeatedly been observed in Guinea-Bissau [23, 24, 41]. While the mechanisms of HIV testing (and ART) stock shortages in Guinea-Bissau are complex, the following factors may have played a role in weakening the national HIV response: 1) heavy workload related to preparations of funding proposals leading to delayed implementation of planned activities and subsequently resulting in a failure to meet the goals set by donors [23]; 2) weakness in PMTCT coordination, procurement and supply management [23, 24]; and 3) suspended or delayed institutional and programmatic support/funding [24, 41]. Tudor Car et al. (2013) reported lack of human, material and financial resources (including HIV test kit stock-outs) as key barriers to the implementation of integrated care in developing countries [4]. While the impact of suspended, delayed or ceased funding has serious consequences, the effect may not be immediate. For example, Guinea-Bissau sustained major funding cuts from key donors beginning in February 2011 and through most of 2012, yet provision of HIV testing in this study remained stable during 2012 due to the late arrival of HIV testing kits originally planned for the 2011 calendar year. Conversely, the effect of decreased funding affected other aspects of PMTCT more rapidly. According to UNICEF, national maternal antiretroviral (ART) prophylaxis initiation rates in Guinea-Bissau decreased from 79 to 54 percent between the first and the fourth quarters of 2012 [24]. Further, suspended funding to the national HIV programme in 2012 resulted in a 6-month stock-out of test kits and a marked reduction in HIV treatment coverage, especially in the PMTCT programme, with only 17.4% of affected women benefiting from treatment in 2013 [41]. Better assessment of a health system’s capacity and weaknesses, directing funding and investments towards vulnerable components of the system, and learning from previous crises could prevent future stock-outs. In addition, larger national and local stocks and more frequent and flexible resupply and finance strategies, together empowering and training human resources locally to navigate the administrative work related to funding and stock management, could mitigate stock-outs [42].
We found an association between periods of political instability and decreased HIV testing. Coup attempts in Guinea-Bissau have previously resulted in the shutdown of the country’s largest HIV clinic at HNSM, and vital institutions such as the national laboratory have been closed repeatedly because of work force strikes when salaries were not paid [28]. Countries that experience conflict also experience negative health outcomes [43], yet the association between conflict and healthcare outcomes in relation to HIV remains complex and differs widely depending the aetiology and consequences of the conflicts. Nevertheless, the deterioration of health infrastructure during and after conflict results in a failure to effectively prevent the potential transmission of HIV [44–46]. Periods of political insecurity in developing countries can not only undermine ART programmes and lead to treatment interruptions [47] but also create a chronic state of fragility and poor health system resilience [48]. While political instability may discourage donors to invest, the long-term effects of suspending aid may result in a serious loss of ground in the fight against HIV/AIDS in settings such as Guinea-Bissau [28, 49].
Women in a polygamous marriage were more likely to be tested for HIV. This may reflect selective testing by healthcare workers, in particular when test kits stocks are insufficient to test all women. Polygamous women may be viewed as high risk, yet a recent study among pregnant women reported no difference in the risk of HIV infection according to marital status in our setting [27]. In the context of limited resources, increasing staff education on more reliable risk factors for HIV infection could mitigate the potential issue of unsubstantiated preferential testing. Improvements in registration systems and communication between antenatal clinics and hospitals would help prioritisation in the case of limited stocks.
Similar to other studies, women with fewer years of formal education were less likely test for HIV [10, 50]. This is concerning as lower educational status has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of HIV [51]. Poor HIV-related knowledge has been identified as a potential barrier to treatment adherence in Guinea-Bissau, yet being illiterate in itself did not appear to be a barrier for adherence [49, 52]. Whilst many socio-economic factors may be difficult to overcome, focussed and culturally appropriate interventions to improve HIV literacy in vulnerable populations may increase HIV test uptake and optimise treatment adherence.
We found an association between not testing for HIV on Sundays and Mondays as well as less testing during evenings and nights. Research regarding birth outcomes has described higher perinatal mortality during weekend births [53–55]. This “weekend effect” can extend to Monday, as observed in this study [56]. Previous findings from Bissau demonstrated poorer access to care for children arriving at the emergency room between 7 pm and 7 am [57]. Broader coverage of antenatal testing (and documentation of test results) may reduce the workload for clinical staff out of hours, yet antenatal HIV testing coverage remained suboptimal (68%) in 2014 in Bissau, and only 33% of children born to HIV-positive mothers received ART prophylaxis [39]. HIV counselling and testing for untested women must be embedded firmly in the 24-hour maternity service, through training of frontline healthcare workers, adequate staffing, and locally competitive remuneration.
Strengths and limitations
This is the first study exploring the provision of HIV testing at labour in Guinea-Bissau. The study is based on data from large sample size of women from all parts of Guinea-Bissau’s capital collected over a 5-year period. Data were collected in a real-life setting and thus reflect the condition of PMTCT services in Bissau throughout a period of political instability and conflict.
Our research has several limitations. First, the study used cross-sectional data collected as part of health surveillance but not specifically for the purpose of this analysis. Furthermore, lack of data on socio-economic status, HIV knowledge and perceived stigma limited our risk factor analysis. Lack of access to national stock diaries to corroborate testing data limited our ability to conclude that stock-outs were the principal causes of test interruptions, although local reports suggest supply issues were the main underlying factor [23, 24, 41]. Antenatal testing was self-reported and may have been influenced by recall bias, fear of stigma or social desirability. HNSM has the country’s largest maternity ward and is located in the capital. Therefore, the utilization of and access to PMTCT services and the stock-out situation of HIV tests in this setting may differ notably compared to other hospitals and clinics in rural areas of Guinea-Bissau limiting our ability to generalize our findings to the entire population.
Conclusion
This study reveals that rapid scale-up PMTCT HIV testing services is possible even in settings with limited resources and political unease. Nevertheless, HIV programmes such as that in Guinea-Bissau must not only be supported in regards to treatment and testing supplies but also importantly aided in establishing proper management of stocks and back-up plans for periods of political and financial instability. While this study did not include specific data on socioeconomic status it shows an important association between marital status and education with reduced testing uptake which must be taken into consideration in the provision of opt out HIV testing. Strengthening antenatal counselling and testing and insuring proper registration and documentation of HIV testing could reduce the need for testing at delivery and improve overall care in Guinea-Bissau.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants of the study. In addition, we would like to thank Aureliano Correia Gomes, Amabelia Rodrigues, Stephan Karl, Neusa Andersen and Andreas Andersen for their help with this research. Finally, we would like to thank the staff at the HNSM maternity ward in Bissau for their invaluable assistance in collecting data.
Data Availability
Data for this study are restricted for ethical concerns. Guinea-Bissau's National Committee on Ethics in Health imposed these restrictions. Data may be accessed by contacting the Bandim Health Project, National Institute of Public Health (INASA) in Guinea-Bissau at bandim@ssi.dk. The Bandim Health Project will facilitate the request for ethical permission from Guinea-Bissau's National Committee on Ethics in Health and provide the data on approval.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a small project research grant from the Albert McKern Bequest, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom to HWU, and by the Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, to DNR.
References
- 1.UNAIDS. How AIDS changed everything-MDG 6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the AIDS response. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2015.
- 2.UNICEF, World Health Organization. Towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: report of a WHO technical consultation, 9–11 November 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: UNICEF, World Health Organization, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization. Global update on the health sector response to HIV. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tudor Car L, Brusamento S, Elmoniry H, van Velthoven M, Pape U, Welch V, et al. The uptake of integrated perinatal prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission programs in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e56550 10.1371/journal.pone.0056550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maartens G, Celum C, Lewin SR. HIV infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Lancet. 2014; 384: 258–271. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60164-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.UNICEF. Maternal Health. Antenatal Care—Current Status + Progress 2016 [updated September 2016; cited 19-10-2016]. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/antenatal-care/#.
- 7.Wettstein C, Mugglin C, Egger M, Blaser N, Salazar L, Estill J, et al. Missed opportunities to prevent mother-to-child-transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS (London, England). 2012; 26(18): 2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Krause J, Subklew-Sehume F, Kenyon C, Colebunders R. Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1): 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marum E, Taegtmeyer M, Chebet K. Scale-up of voluntary HIV counseling and testing in Kenya. JAMA. 2006; 296(7): 859–862. 10.1001/jama.296.7.859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gunn JK, Asaolu IO, Center KE, Gibson SJ, Wightman P, Ezeanolue EE, et al. Antenatal care and uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016; 19(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Doherty T, Chopra M, Nsibande D, Mngoma D. Improving the coverage of the PMTCT programme through a participatory quality improvement intervention in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9(1): 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pai NP, Klein MB. Rapid testing at labor and delivery to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in developing settings: issues and challenges. Womens Health (Lond). 2009; 5(1): 55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.An SJ, George AS, LeFevre AE, Mpembeni R, Mosha I, Mohan D, et al. Supply-side dimensions and dynamics of integrating HIV testing and counselling into routine antenatal care: a facility assessment from Morogoro Region, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15(1): 451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thiam S, Kimotho V, Gatonga P. Why are IPTp coverage targets so elusive in sub-Saharan Africa? A systematic review of health system barriers. Malaria J. 2013; 12(1): 353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mori AT, Owenya J. Stock-outs of antiretroviral drugs and coping strategies used to prevent changes in treatment regimens in Kinondoni District, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2014; 7(1): 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bajunirwe F, Muzoora M. Barriers to the implementation of programs for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a cross-sectional survey in rural and urban Uganda. AIDS Res Ther. 2005; 2(1): 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.World Bank. Country profile: Guinea-Bissau. 2016 [cited 08-01-2016]. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/guineabissau.
- 18.Ferreira PM. GUINEA-BISSAU. African Security Review. 2004; 13(4): 44–56. [Google Scholar]
- 19.United Nations Security Council. Special report of the Secretary-General on the situation in Guinea-Bissau. New York, UN Security Council, 2012. 30.04.12. Report No. S/2012/280.
- 20.Fund For Peace. Fragile State Index 2016. Washington D.C., USA: The Fund for Peace, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abdenur AE, de Souza Neto DM. South− South cooperation and democracy in Africa: Brazil's role in Guinea-Bissau. Africa Rev. 2013; 5(2): 104–117. [Google Scholar]
- 22.BBC. Guinea-Bissau profile—Timeline. BBC; 2016 [updated 18-08-2015; cited 24-09-2016]; Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13579838.
- 23.UNICEF. UNICEF Annual Report 2010 for Guinea-Bissau. UNICEF, 2010.
- 24.UNICEF. UNICEF Annual Report 2012 for Guinea Bissau, WCARO. UNICEF, 2012.
- 25.Olesen JS, Jespersen S, Da ZS, Rodrigues A, Erikstrup C, Aaby P, et al. HIV-2 continues to decrease, while HIV-1 is stabilizing in Guinea-Bissau. AIDS. 2018; 32(9): 1193–1198. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.UNICEF. Towards an AIDS-free generation- Children and AIDS: Sixth Stocktaking Report, 2013, UNICEF, New York, 2013.
- 27.Gianelli E, Riva A, Rankin Bravo FA, Da Silva Te D, Mariani E, Casazza G, et al. Prevalence and risk determinants of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections in pregnant women in Bissau. J Infect. 2010; 61(5): 391–398. 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jespersen S, Hønge BL, Oliveira I, Medina C, Té DdS, Correia FG, et al. Challenges facing HIV treatment in Guinea-Bissau: the benefits of international research collaborations. Bull World Health Org. 2014; 92(12): 909–914. 10.2471/BLT.14.135749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hønge BL, Jespersen S, Aunsborg J, Mendes DV, Medina C, da Silva Té D, et al. High prevalence and excess mortality of late presenters among HIV-1, HIV-2 and HIV-1/2 dually infected patients in Guinea-Bissau-a cohort study from West Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2016; 25(40). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC medical research methodology. 2003; 3(1): 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. American journal of epidemiology. 2004; 159(7): 702–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weiser SD, Heisler M, Leiter K, Percy-de Korte F, Tlou S, DeMonner S, et al. Routine HIV testing in Botswana: a population-based study on attitudes, practices, and human rights concerns. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(7): e261 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moses A, Zimba C, Kamanga E, Nkhoma J, Maida A, Martinson F, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission: program changes and the effect on uptake of the HIVNET 012 regimen in Malawi. AIDS. 2008; 22(1): 83–87. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f163b5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Perez F, Zvandaziva C, Engelsmann B, Dabis F. Acceptability of routine HIV testing (" opt-out") in antenatal services in two rural districts of Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 41(4): 514–520. 10.1097/01.qai.0000191285.70331.a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nyuzaghl J, Ohene S, Odoi-Agyarko K. Acceptability of routine offer of HIV Testing (opt-out approach) among pregnant women in the Wa municipality. Ghana Med J. 2011; 45(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ekouevi DK, Kariyiare BG, Coffie PA, Jutand M-A, Akpadza K, Lawson-Evi A, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of rapid HIV screening in a labour ward in Togo. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012; 15(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vieira N, Rasmussen DN, Oliveira I, Gomes A, Aaby P, Wejse C, et al. Awareness, attitudes and perceptions regarding HIV and PMTCT amongst pregnant women in Guinea-Bissau–a qualitative study. BMC Women's Health. 2017; 17(1): 71 10.1186/s12905-017-0427-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.da Silva Te D, Ndumba A, Jalo A, Monteiro H, Jenkins A. A bottleneck analysis to inform the elimination of mother-to-child HIV transmission (eMTCT) in Guinea Bissau. XIX International AIDS Conference Washington D.C. 2012.
- 39.SNLS. UNGASS Country progress report Guinea-Bissau—2015. Guinea-Bissau: Secretariado Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA, 2015.
- 40.Oliveira I, Jensen-Fangel S, da Silva D, Ndumba A, Medina C, Nanadje A, et al. Epidemic Stevens–Johnson syndrome in HIV patients in Guinea-Bissau: a side effect of the drug-supply policy? AIDS. 2010; 24(5): 783–785. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328335cead [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.UNICEF. UNICEF Annual Report 2013 –Guinea Bissau. UNICEF, 2013.
- 42.Jamieson D, Kellerman SE. The 90 90 90 strategy to end the HIV Pandemic by 2030: Can the supply chain handle it? J Int AIDS Soc. 2016; 19(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Atti E, Gulis G. Political determinants of progress in the MDGs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Public Health. 2016: 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hanson BW, Wodak A, Fiamma A, Coates TJ. Refocusing and prioritizing HIV programmes in conflict and post-conflict settings: funding recommendations. AIDS (London, England). 2008; 22(Suppl 2): S95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mann M, Lurie MN, Kimaiyo S, Kantor R. Effects of political conflict induced treatment interruptions on HIV drug resistance. AIDS Rev. 2013; 15(1): 15 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Månsson F, Alves A, da Silva ZJ, Dias F, Andersson S, Biberfeld G, et al. Trends of HIV-1 and HIV-2 prevalence among pregnant women in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa: possible effect of the civil war 1998–1999. Sex Transm Infect. 2007; 83(6): 463–467. 10.1136/sti.2007.025353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Veenstra N, Whiteside A, Lalloo D, Gibbs A. Unplanned antiretroviral treatment interruptions in southern Africa: how should we be managing these? Global Health. 2010; 6(1): 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. Lancet. 2015; 385(9980): 1910–1912. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60755-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rasmussen DN, da Silva Té D, Rodkjaer L, Oliveira I, Medina C, Barfod T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to antiretroviral therapy adherence among patients with HIV in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau: a qualitative study. African J AIDS Res. 2013; 12(1): 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rakgoasi SD. HIV counselling and testing of pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Botswana, 2001. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005; 23(1): 58–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hargreaves JR, Bonell CP, Boler T, Boccia D, Birdthistle I, Fletcher A, et al. Systematic review exploring time trends in the association between educational attainment and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2008; 22(3): 403–414. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f2aac3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dyrehave C, Rasmussen DN, Hønge BL, Jespersen S, Correia FG, Medina C, et al. Nonadherence is associated with lack of HIV-related knowledge: a cross-sectional study among HIV-infected individuals in Guinea-Bissau. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2016; 15(4): 350–358. 10.1177/2325957415599211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Macfarlane A. Variations in number of births and perinatal mortality by day of week in England and Wales. Br Med J. 1978; 2(6153): 1670–1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hendry RA. The weekend—a dangerous time to be born? BJOG. 1981; 88(12): 1200–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Palmer WL, Bottle A, Aylin P. Association between day of delivery and obstetric outcomes: observational study. BMJ. 2015; 351: h5774 10.1136/bmj.h5774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Freemantle N, Ray D, McNulty D, Rosser D, Bennett S, Keogh BE, et al. Increased mortality associated with weekend hospital admission: a case for expanded seven day services? BMJ. 2015; 351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sodemann M, Biai S, Jakobsen M, Aaby P. Knowing a medical doctor is associated with reduced mortality among sick children consulting a paediatric ward in Guinea‐Bissau, West Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2006; 11(12): 1868–1877. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01744.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data for this study are restricted for ethical concerns. Guinea-Bissau's National Committee on Ethics in Health imposed these restrictions. Data may be accessed by contacting the Bandim Health Project, National Institute of Public Health (INASA) in Guinea-Bissau at bandim@ssi.dk. The Bandim Health Project will facilitate the request for ethical permission from Guinea-Bissau's National Committee on Ethics in Health and provide the data on approval.