Abstract
Background
Hypertension accounts for more than 212 million global disability-adjusted life-years, and more than 15 million in sub-Saharan Africa. Identifying factors underlying the escalating burden of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa may inform delivery of targeted public health interventions.
Methods
As part of the cross-sectional nationally representative Uganda National Asthma Survey conducted in 2016, we measured blood pressure (BP) in the general population across five regions of Uganda. We defined hypertension as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or on-going use of medications for the purpose of lowering BP among adults (≥18 years of age); pre-hypertension as systolic BP between 120 and 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP bteween 80 and 90 mmHg among adolescents and adults (≥12 years of age).
Findings
Of 3416 participants who met inclusion criteria, 38.9% were male, and mean age ± SD was 33.8 ± 16.9 years. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was 31.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.2 to 32.8). The adjusted prevalence of hypertension was highest in the Central Region (34.3%; 95% CI 32.6 to 36.0), and it was comparable to that in the West and East Regions. However, compared with the Central Region, hypertension was significantly less prevalent in the North (22.0%; 95 CI 19.4 to 24.6) and West Nile Regions (24.1%; 95% CI 22.0 to 26.3). Adjustment for demographic characteristics (occupation, monthly income, and educational attainment) of participants did not account for the significantly lower prevalence of hypertension in the North and West Nile Regions. The prevalence of pre-hypertension was 38.8% (95% CI 37.7 to 39.8), and it was highly prevalent among young adults (21–40 years of age: 42.8%; 95% CI 41.2–44.5%) in all regions.
Conclusions
Hypertension is starkly prevalent in Uganda, and numerous more people, including young adults are at increased risk. The burden of hypertension is highest in the Central, Western, and Eastern regions of the country; demographic characteristics did not fully account for the disparate regional burden of hypertension. Future studies should explore the potential additional impact of epidemiological shifts, including diet and lifestyle changes, on the development of hypertension.
Introduction
Hypertension is the leading contributor to the global burden of disease (GBD). In the GBD Study of 2015, it accounted for more than 212 million global disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)–reflecting a 40% increase from 1990 [1,2]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the corresponding change in DALYs attributable to hypertension ranged from 60% to 100% [1]. Further, with the increasing prevalence of hypertension in many sub-Saharan African countries [3], experts project a major increase in the burden of disease that will be attributable to hypertension in this setting [4,5]. Globally, factors driving the increase in the attributable DALYs for hypertension include demographic (e.g., population ageing, population growth, etc) and epidemiologic (e.g., adoption of western diets and lifestyles) transitions [2]. Of greater concern, however, is the paucity of data describing the role of these factors in the upward trajectory of the burden of hypertension in many sub-Saharan African countries.
Likewise, the prevalence of hypertension in Uganda appears to be high, ranging from 11% to 32%. Recent studies have highlighted inequities in the prevalence of hypertension among specific demographic groups, including men, middle-aged adults, professionals, and residents of the Central (home to the highly urbanized capital city of Kampala) and Eastern regions [6–12]. However, although prior studies have reported disparities in the prevalence of hypertension across geographic regions in the country [6–8], none examined whether correlates of the demographic transition, including educational attainment, occupation, and monthly income, explain these inequities. Therefore, as part of the Uganda National Asthma Survey (UNAS), we estimated the prevalence of hypertension in five regions of Uganda, and we sought to examine the potential impact of demographic factors on the prevalence of hypertension across geographic regions in Uganda.
Methods
Study population
The UNAS was a nationally representative cross-sectional study conducted from August to November 2016 among community-dwelling individuals, 12–100 years of age, recruited using a 3-stage cluster sampling strategy. In the first stage, we purposively sampled one district from each of the five regions of Uganda: Kampala (the capital and largest city) in the Central, Kiruhura in the West, Maracha in West Nile, Pader in the North, and Iganga in the East. Second, we sampled clusters from each selected district based on probability proportionate to size. Finally, we selected households from each cluster using simple random sampling from a household list generated by village leaders in each cluster. Adolescent and adult (≥12 years of age) inhabitants of selected households were eligible to participate in the study. Individuals who were residents of congregation settings (schools, prisons, homes), temporary residents (less than 2 weeks in household of selected villages), or those who did not provide written consent were excluded.
Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics committee and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology approved the UNAS. Participants provided written informed consent and had liberty to terminate study participation at any time during the study. Children ≤18 years of age provided assent and the parent or legal guardian provided consent on their behalf.
Definition of hypertension
We measured blood pressure (BP) using an Omron automated sphygmomanometer model HEM-907, which has an adjustable cuff size. Participants assumed a resting seated posture ≥10 minutes prior to two sequential BP readings taken 10 minutes apart. We considered the average of the two BP readings as the individual’s BP, and we estimated mean arterial pressure (MAP) as the sum of one-third of systolic BP and two-thirds of diastolic BP. We defined hypertension as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or self-reported on-going use of medications for the purpose of lowering BP; pre-hypertension as systolic BP between 120 and 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP bteween 80 and 90 mmHg. Although the UNAS recruited both adolescents and adults, we defined hypertension among adults (≥18 years of age) only because the epidemiology of hypertension in children differs from that in adults.13 However, we defined prehypertension in both adolescents [13] and adults.
Assessment of covariates
We designated urban-rural status at the cluster level based on the 2014 National Census report. Participants self-reported socio-demographic characteristics: age, sex, educational attainment, occupation, monthly income, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Categories of educational attainment included less than primary school, completed primary school, and completed secondary school or higher. Subgroups for occupation comprised working in office settings (professionals and clerical jobs), peasant farming, construction work, unemployed, or other (not specified). Cigarette smoking included self-reported current or former smoking history. Alcohol consumption comprised self-reported history of alcohol drinking in the 12 months preceding study visit. Anthropometric measurements included height (measured without shoes to the nearest 0.1-centimeter using a stadiometer [SECA; Hamburg, Germany]) and weight (measured without shoes and in light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kilogram using a calibrated beam scale). We defined body mass index in kilograms per meter-squared.
Statistical analysis
We computed survey weights for the UNAS to account for the differential probability of sampling households–described in detail in the S1 File. Continuous covariates were described using mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range) and categorical covariates were summarized as frequency and proportion. We compared covariates by geographical region using Mann-Whitney nonparametric test for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. We estimated the weighted prevalence of hypertension with 95% confidence interval (CI), and compared the prevalence of hypertension across regional and demographic strata using survey-weighted logistic regression.
We employed logistic regression models, accounting for sampling design effect, including clustering, using UNAS survey weights, to estimate the impact of demographic factors (age, sex, educational attainment, occupation, and monthly income) on the prevalence of hypertension across geographic regions. Variables were sequentially added to the model based on a priori assumptions [8]. The single-equation link test assessed for specification errors in the final model [14], and the uncentered variance inflation factors test evaluated collinearity. Subsequently, we generated predicted probabilities of hypertension and prehypertension by geographic region with values of covariates from the above logistic models fixed at the cohort mean or reference group.
Statistical significance tests are 2-sided at the 5% α level. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA v.15 software (STATA corp., College Station, TX), and Arc Global Information Systems, ArcMap v10.4.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) was used to map the prevalence of hypertension across regions.
Results
Characteristics of study participants
Of 4310 individuals who were eligible, 3416 (79.3%) participated in the UNAS study–all of whom were included in the present analysis. Overall, 1327 (38.9%) participants were male, mean age ± SD was 33.8 ± 16.9 years, few completed secondary school or higher (10.7%), and the majority were peasant farmers (43.3%). Participants in the Central (vs. the overall study cohort) were less likely to be males (26.6% vs. 38.9%), but more likely to have completed ≥primary school (48.8% vs. 30.6%). They were also more likely to be occupied as a market vendor (8.5% vs. 3.3%) and to have greater monthly income (median income, per 1000 Ugandan Shillings 150 vs. 40).
Overall, mean ± SD systolic and diastolic BP were 124 ± 20 and 80 ± 14 mmHg, respectively. Mean arterial pressure was 95 ± 15 mmHg. Mean systolic BP was highest in the East (129 mmHg) and Central (127 mmHg); diastolic BP was highest in the West (84 mmHg) and Central (83 mmHg). Mean ± SD BMI was 21.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2; mean BMI was highest in the Central (24.4 kg/m2) and West (22.4 kg/m2) (Table 1).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (≥12 years of age) in the Uganda National Asthma survey, stratified by geographic region.
| Demographic characteristics | Overall N = 3416 |
Geographic region | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central | West | West Nile | North | East | ||
| Male sex, no. (%) | 1327 (38.9) | 207 (26.6) | 360 (49.0) | 271 (40.9) | 263 (42.0) | 226 (36.9) |
| Age, mean ± SD, y | 33.8 ± 16.9 | 32.4 ± 14.8 | 37.6 ± 16.8 | 32.7 ± 16.1 | 29.0 ± 16.4 | 37.3 ± 19.1 |
| Educational attainment, no. (%) | ||||||
| <Primary school | 2007 (58.8) | 209 (26.8) | 422 (57.4) | 504 (76.0) | 477 (76.2) | 395 (64.4) |
| Completed primary school | 1045 (30.6) | 380 (48.8) | 222 (30.2) | 134 (20.2) | 134 (21.4) | 175 (28.6) |
| ≥Secondary school1 | 364 (10.7) | 190 (24.4) | 91 (12.4) | 25 (3.8) | 15 (2.4) | 43 (7.0) |
| Occupation, no. (%) | ||||||
| Office setting2 | 151 (4.4) | 83 (10.7) | 25 (3.4) | 12 (1.8) | 15 (2.4) | 16 (2.6) |
| Peasant farming | 1476 (43.3) | 7 (0.9) | 435 (59.4) | 398 (60.0) | 346 (55.5) | 290 (47.4) |
| Market vendor | 111 (3.3) | 66 (8.5) | 20 (2.7) | 11 (1.7) | 3 (0.5) | 11 (1.8) |
| Unemployed | 560 (16.4) | 223 (28.6) | 31 (4.2) | 131 (19.8) | 27 (4.3) | 148 (24.2) |
| Others3 | 1113 (32.6) | 400 (51.4) | 222 (30.3) | 111 (16.7) | 233 (37.3) | 147 (24.0) |
| Monthly income, median [IQR]4 | 40 [20–100] | 150 [60–300] | 60 [30–100] | 20 [10–48] | 10 [5–30] | 40 [20–90] |
| Cigarette smoking, no. (%) | 242 (7.1) | 28 (3.6) | 60 (8.2) | 107 (16.1) | 33 (5.3) | 14 (2.3) |
| Alcohol intake, no. (%) | 621 (18.2) | 195 (25.0) | 57 (7.8) | 233 (35.1) | 108 (17.3) | 28 (4.6) |
| Blood pressure, mean ± SD, mm Hg | ||||||
| Systolic | 124 ± 20 | 127 ± 19 | 123 ± 17 | 124 ± 19 | 121 ± 18 | 129 ± 24 |
| Diastolic | 80 ± 14 | 83 ± 13 | 84 ± 19 | 78 ± 11 | 77 ± 11 | 80 ± 13 |
| Mean arterial pressure | 95 ± 15 | 97 ± 14 | 97 ± 16 | 93 ± 13 | 91 ± 12 | 96 ± 16 |
| Body mass index, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 21.3 ± 6.4 | 24.4 ± 5.8 | 22.4 ± 5.4 | 18.5 ± 3.0 | 18.6 ± 3.1 | 20.8 ± 8.9 |
1Completed secondary ± tertiary ± university
2Includes professional and clerical jobs
3Examples include student, small business owner
4Per 1000 Uganda shillings
Unadjusted prevalence of hypertension
The unadjusted national prevalence of hypertension among adults was 31.5% (95% CI: 30.3 to 32.8). The prevalence was higher among males (vs. females): 34.2% vs. 30.2% (P = 0.007); among individuals with <primary (vs. ≥primary) school: 35.3% vs. 28.1% (P = 0.014); and with increasing age (P for trend = 0.005) and monthly income (P for trend <0.001). The prevalence did not differ by rural-urban status: 32.0% (urban) vs. 30.9% (rural); P = 0.309. Although the there was no evidence for a trend in the prevalence of hypertension by occupation (P for trend = 0.379), the prevalence of hypertension was highest among market vendors (43.8%; 95% CI 38.8 to 49.0) (Table 2).
Table 2. Prevalence of hypertension among adults (≥18 years of age) in Uganda in 2016, stratified by socio-demographic characteristics.
| Characteristics | Prevalence of hypertension | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (95% CI) |
Prevalence ratio (95% CI) |
P trend | ||
| Total population, n = 2794 | 31.5 (30.3–32.8) | NA | ||
| Sex | Male | 34.2 (32.3–36.2) | reference | 0.01 |
| Female | 30.2 (28.7–31.7) | 0.83 (0.75–0.92) | ||
| Age, years | 18–20 | 12.8 (10.7–15.2) | reference | 0.01 |
| 21–40 | 22.9 (21.5–24.4) | 2.03 (1.63–2.53) | ||
| 41–60 | 49.9 (46.8–53.0) | 6.80 (5.45–8.48) | ||
| >60 | 56.3 (51.8–60.7) | 8.79 (6.64–11.62) | ||
| Region | Central | 32.0 (30.3–33.7) | reference | 0.20 |
| West | 36.1 (33.7–38.5) | 1.20 (1.05–1.37) | ||
| West Nile | 25.1 (22.9–27.4) | 0.71 (0.62–0.82) | ||
| North | 21.7 (19.2–24.4) | 0.59 (0.50–0.70) | ||
| East | 37.3 (34.9–39.8) | 1.26 (1.11–1.44) | ||
| Urban-rural status | Urban | 32.0 (30.3–33.7) | reference | 0.31 |
| Rural | 30.9 (29.1–32.8) | 0.95 (0.85–1.07) | ||
| Educational attainment | <Primary school | 35.3 (33.2–37.5) | reference | 0.01 |
| Primary school | 28.1 (26.4–29.9) | 0.71 (0.63–0.81) | ||
| ≥Secondary school1 | 29.9 (27.2–32.9) | 0.78 (0.66–0.92) | ||
| Occupation | Office setting2 | 30.6 (26.6–35.0) | reference | 0.38 |
| Peasant farming | 30.3 (28.4–32.2) | 0.98 (0.79–1.22) | ||
| Market vendor | 43.8 (38.8–49.0) | 1.76 (1.31–2.37) | ||
| Unemployed | 31.7 (29.3–34.3) | 1.05 (0.84–1.32) | ||
| Others3 | 30.4 (28.3–32.5) | 0.99 (0.79–1.23) | ||
| Monthly income, UgX4 | <20000 | 27.9 (25.1–30.9) | reference | <0.01 |
| 20000–100000 | 31.8 (29.7–34.0) | 1.21 (1.03–1.42) | ||
| 100001–200000 | 34.9 (31.9–37.9) | 1.38 (1.14–1.69) | ||
| ≥200001 | 36.4 (33.6–39.4) | 1.48 (1.23–1.78) | ||
CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; UgX, Ugandan Shillings (1 USD = 3,500 UgX)
1Completed secondary ± tertiary ± university
2Includes professional and clerical jobs
3Examples include student, small business owner
4Per 1000 Uganda shillings
Prior to age- and sex-adjustment, hypertension was highly prevalent in the East (37.3%; 95% CI 34.9 to 39.8), West (36.1%; 95% CI 33.7 to 38.5), and Central (32.0%; 95% CI 30.3 to 33.7) Regions, but it was comparatively less prevalent in the North (21.7%; 95% CI 19.2 to 24.4) and West-Nile (25.1%; 95% CI 22.9 to 27.4) Regions (Fig 1). In unadjusted regression models with the Central Region as the reference, the prevalence of hypertension was 20% higher in the West (PR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.37), 26% higher in the East (PR 1.26; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.44), 41% lower in the North (PR 0.59; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.70), and 29% lower in the West Nile (PR 0.71; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.82) Regions (Table 2).
Fig 1. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among adults (≥18 years of age) in Uganda by geographical region.
Adjusted prevalence of hypertension
Overall, the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among adults was 31.5% (95% CI 30.2–32.8). Adjustment for demographics annulled the excess prevalence of hypertension in the West and East, compared to the Central: P = 0.845 and P = 0.406 for West and East, respectively. As such, the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension in the West (32.5%) and East (32.3%) were similar to that of the Central (34.3%). On the contrary, adjustment for demographics did not account for the low prevalence of hypertension in the North and West Nile Regions compared to the Central Region (all P remained <0.05). Thus, the age-and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension in the North (22.0%) and West Nile (24.1%) remained substantially lower than in the Central region (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3. Association of region with prevalent hypertension among adults (≥18 years of age) before and after sequential adjustments for demographics and socio-economic status.
| Region | PR (95% CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: unadjusted | Central | Reference | NA |
| West | 1.20 (1.05–1.37) | 0.02 | |
| West Nile | 0.71 (0.62–0.82) | <0.01 | |
| North | 0.59 (0.50–0.70) | <0.01 | |
| East | 1.26 (1.11–1.44) | 0.01 | |
| Model 2: adjusted for age and sex | Central | Reference | NA |
| West | 0.92 (0.79–1.06) | 0.17 | |
| West Nile | 0.58 (0.49–0.67) | <0.01 | |
| North | 0.50 (0.42–0.61) | <0.01 | |
| East | 0.90 (0.78–1.04) | 0.11 | |
| Model 3: model 2 + SES | Central | Reference | NA |
| West | 1.02 (0.83–1.25) | 0.85 | |
| West Nile | 0.72 (0.56–0.91) | 0.02 | |
| North | 0.59 (0.45–0.78) | 0.01 | |
| East | 1.08 (0.86–1.36) | 0.41 |
PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; SES, socio-economic status: urban-rural status, occupation, monthly income, and educational attainment
Table 4. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of pre-hypertension and hypertension by geographic region and age category.
| Pre-hypertension N = 34161 |
Hypertension N = 27941 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (95% CI) | P trend | Prevalence (95% CI) | P trend | |
| Overall | 38.8 (37.7–39.8) | 31.5 (30.2–32.8) | ||
| By geographic region | ||||
| Central | 39.3 (37.6–41.0) | 0.48 | 34.3 (32.6–36.0) | 0.22 |
| West | 37.2 (35.0–39.4) | 32.5 (30.3–34.8) | ||
| West Nile | 37.6 (35.5–39.7) | 24.1 (22.0–26.3) | ||
| North | 34.8 (32.2–37.4) | 22.0 (19.4–24.6) | ||
| East | 41.2 (38.9–43.4) | 32.3 (30.2–34.4) | ||
| By age category | ||||
| 12–20 years2 | 37.6 (35.3–39.8) | 0.05 | 12.8 (10.5–15.1)2 | 0.01 |
| 21–40 years | 42.8 (41.2–44.5) | 23.0 (21.5–24.4) | ||
| 41–60 years | 34.7 (32.4–36.9) | 49.8 (46.7–52.9) | ||
| >60 years | 30.3 (26.4–34.3) | 56.2 (51.8–60.6) | ||
CI, confidence interval
1Pre-hypertension includes participants ≥12 years; hypertension restricted to those ≥18 years of age
2Hypertension restricted to participants 18 to 20 years of age
The overall age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of pre-hypertension was high (38.8%; 95% CI 37.7–39.8%), and it was similar across all regions (p-value for trend: 0.482). Nonetheless, it was highest in the East: 41.2% (95% CI 38.9 to 43.4%) and lowest the North 34.8% (95% CI 32.2 to 37.4%). The prevalence of pre-hypertension was highest among young adults and adolescents (p-value for trend: 0.048). Among those in the 21–40 years age category, it was 42.8% (95% CI 41.2–44.5%), and it was 37.6% (95% CI 35.3–39.8%) in the 12–20 years age category (Table 4).
Predicted probability of BP phenotypes across age distribution
Fig 2 illustrates predicted probabilities of BP statuses (normotensive, pre-hypertensive, and hypertensive) across age. The predicted probability of being pre-hypertensive increased gradually with age up until middle age (about 40 years old)–which coincided with an increase in the probability of being hypertensive–after which it decreased steadily with advancing age. There were substantial regional differences in the inflection point of the predicted probability of being pre-hypertensive–that is, the age at which the slope of the predicted probability became zero. This threshold occurred at an earlier age in the Central and the West and at a later age in West Nile, the East, and the North (Fig 2B).
Fig 2. Predicted probabilities of being normotensive (left, upper: BP <120/80 mmHg), pre-hypertensive (right, upper: BP ≥120/80 but <140/90 mmHg), or hypertensive (left, lower: BP ≥140/90 mmHg) in five regions of Uganda according to age, years.
Discussion
In this nationally representative cross-sectional survey, the overall age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among adults (≥18 years of age) in Uganda was 31.5%, and for pre-hypertension, it was 38.8%. According to region, the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was highest in the Central (34.3%), West (32.5%), and East (32.3%) Regions and lowest in the North (22.0%) and West Nile (24.1%) Regions. Ostensibly traditional demographic factors (age, gender, educational attainment, occupation, and monthly income) did not account for the lower prevalence of hypertension in the North and West Nile compared with the Central Region–suggesting that epidemiologic factors related to lifestyle and dietary changes may also play a role in the escalating burden of hypertension in Uganda. Further, pre-hypertension was highly prevalent among young adults (age ≤40 years) in all regions. Thus, to inform public health interventions targeted at high-risk groups, including young adults, future studies should delineate specific factors related to the epidemiologic transition and their potential role in conferring greater risk for hypertension in Uganda.
Our finding of a high prevalence of hypertension in Uganda is consistent with recent reports from several countries in sub-Saharan Africa [12,15–18], including prior reports from Uganda.8 For example, a study from Ethiopia found a high age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among men (31.5%) and women (28.9%) in Addis Ababa in 2016 [15]. In another study from a rural community in South Africa, the prevalence of hypertension was 38.2% [16]. Similarly, a high prevalence of hypertension has been reported in many other countries in the region, including Tanzania, Ghana, and Nigeria [12,17–18]. Thus, our finding corroborate this body of evidence in Uganda and, taken together, they affirm the notion [18–22] of a region-wide epidemic of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa, which is probably related to rapid urbanization in the region. Epidemiologic studies highlighting groups that are particularly at increased risk for hypertension in the region are therefore warranted to inform delivery of targeted interventions.
In Uganda, prior work has yielded conflicting evidence regarding the epidemiologic profile of individuals who are at increased risk for hypertension. While some studies suggest a disproportionately higher prevalence of hypertension in the Eastern [6] and Western [7] Regions of the country, a recent countrywide survey found no evidence in support of regional disparities in the prevalence of hypertension in Uganda [8]. Despite similar designs and analytic approaches, our finding departs from that of Guwatudde and colleagues [8] in that the prevalence of hypertension was significantly lower in the North and West Nile compared with the Central Region, which persisted after adjusting for demographic factors. Additional studies are warranted to determine reasons for this discrepancy.
Nonetheless, the geographic disparity in the demographic-adjusted prevalence of hypertension in our study gives credence to a multifactorial etiological model of hypertension in Uganda. For instance, the inflection point of the predicted probability of pre-hypertension (which was largely driven by a proportionate increase in the predicted probability of hypertension) occurred at lower age thresholds in low prevalent regions (North and West Nile) compared with high prevalent regions (Central and West)–although the slope for the predicted probability of hypertension across the age distribution was comparable in all regions. Therefore, efforts to mitigate risk for hypertension should consider multiple domains of factors, including demographic, environmental, behavioral, and genetic factors, that confer risk for hypertension in Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries.
We noted some limitations. Because of the cross-sectional design of our study, we were not able to assess BP progression in participants over time. As such, the region-specific trajectory of BP status across age that we demonstrated in our study does not necessarily reflect patterns of BP progression among individuals in Uganda. Longitudinal assessments of changes in BP status among individuals will be required to elucidate potential regional differences in the rate of progression from pre-hypertensive BP to hypertension in Uganda. Despite this limitation, our study has important strengths. The large sample size generated sufficient degrees of freedom to detect regional differences in the prevalence of hypertension in Uganda, and the 3-stage countrywide cluster sampling strategy permitted enrollment of a nationally representative sample, which is generalizable to the Ugandan population.
In conclusion, Uganda has a very high burden of hypertension and pre-hypertension affecting individuals across the entire life course. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of hypertension were significantly lower in the less urbanized North and West Nile Regions suggesting factors related to lifestyle and dietary changes may play an important role. Future investigation should identify epidemiologic factors that confer greater risk for hypertension in the Central, Western, and Eastern Regions of Uganda.
Supporting information
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all study personnel and individuals who participated in the Uganda National Asthma Survey for their commitment and enthusiasm for the study. We also thank Angela Zoss (Duke Data Visualization Services, Duke University) for mapping the prevalence of hypertension across geographical regions in Uganda.
Data Availability
The UNAS data that we used in this manuscript is third part data obtained from the Makerere University Lung Institute. For questions regarding data access, please see below for the primary contact for the Publication Committee of the UNAS at the Makerere University Lung Institute: Jackline Nakabira; Administrator, Makerere University Lung Institute; Email: jackienakabira@gmail.com; Phone contacts: +2560414499134 or +256775653730. Data requests may also be sent to Dr. Bruce Kirenga, at brucekirenga@yahoo.co.uk
Funding Statement
The Uganda National Asthma Survey was funded by the National Institute of Health under award number R24 TW008861, the NCS, and the University Medical Center Groningen (Groningen, Netherlands). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2017. January 10;317(2):165–182. 10.1001/jama.2016.19043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016. October 8;388(10053):1459–1544. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005. January 15–21;365(9455):217–23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Twagirumukiza M, De Bacquer D, Kips JG, de Backer G, Stichele RV, Van Bortel LM. Current and projected prevalence of arterial hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa by sex, age and habitat: an estimate from population studies. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1243–52. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328346995d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ibrahim MM, Damasceno A. Hypertension in developing countries. Lancet. 2012. August 11;380(9841):611–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60861-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwarisiima D, Balzer L, Heller D, Kotwani P, Chamie G, Clark T, et al. Population-Based Assessment of Hypertension Epidemiology and Risk Factors among HIV-Positive and General Populations in Rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2016. May 27;11(5):e0156309 10.1371/journal.pone.0156309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wamala JF, Karyabakabo Z, Ndungutse D, Guwatudde D. Prevalence factors associated with hypertension in Rukungiri district, Uganda—a community-based study. Afr Health Sci. 2009. September;9(3):153–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guwatudde D, Mutungi G, Wesonga R, Kajjura R, Kasule H, Muwonge J, et al. The Epidemiology of Hypertension in Uganda: Findings from the National Non-Communicable Diseases Risk Factor Survey. PLoS One. 2015. September 25;10(9):e0138991 10.1371/journal.pone.0138991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalyesubula R, Kayongo A, Semitala FC, Muhanguzi A, Katantazi N, Ayers D, et al. Trends and level of control of hypertension among adults attending an ambulatory HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda: a retrospective study. BMJ Glob Health. 2016. November 24;1(3):e000055 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kayima J, Nankabirwa J, Sinabulya I, Nakibuuka J, Zhu X, Rahman M, et al. Determinants of hypertension in a young adult Ugandan population in epidemiological transition-the MEPI-CVD survey. BMC Public Health. 2015. August 28;15:830 10.1186/s12889-015-2146-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nyombi KV, Kizito S, Mukunya D, Nabukalu A, Bukama M, Lunyera J, et al. High prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk factors among medical students at Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. BMC Res Notes. 2016. February 17;9:110 10.1186/s13104-016-1924-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guwatudde D, Nankya-Mutyoba J, Kalyesubula R, Laurence C, Adebamowo C, Ajayi I, et al. The burden of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: a four-country cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015. December 5;15:1211 10.1186/s12889-015-2546-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, et al. ; Subcommittee on screening and management of high blood pressure in children. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(3):e20171904 10.1542/peds.2017-1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pregibon D. Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. Applied Statistics (1980) 29: 15–24. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tesfaye F, Byass P, Wall S. Population based prevalence of high blood pressure among adults in Addis Ababa: uncovering a silent epidemic. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009. August 23;9:39 10.1186/1471-2261-9-39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maimela E, Alberts M, Modjadji SE, Choma SS, Dikotope SA, Ntuli TS, et al. The Prevalence and Determinants of Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factors amongst Adults in the Dikgale Health Demographic and Surveillance System (HDSS) Site, Limpopo Province of South Africa. PLoS One. 2016. February 16;11(2):e0147926 10.1371/journal.pone.0147926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cappuccio FP, Micah FB, Emmett L, Kerry SM, Antwi S, Martin-Peprah R, et al. Prevalence, detection, management, and control of hypertension in Ashanti, West Africa. Hypertension. 2004. May;43(5):1017–22. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000126176.03319.d8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murthy GV, Fox S, Sivasubramaniam S, Gilbert CE, Mahdi AM, Imam AU, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for hypertension and association with ethnicity in Nigeria: results from a national survey. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013. Oct-Nov;24(9–10):344–50. 10.5830/CVJA-2013-058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van de Vijver S, Akinyi H, Oti S, Olajide A, Agyemang C, Aboderin I, et al. Status report on hypertension in Africa—consultative review for the 6th Session of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Health on NCD's. Pan Afr Med J. 2013. October 5;16:38 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.38.3100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nulu S, Aronow WS, Frishman WH. Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Contextual View of Patterns of Disease, Best Management, and Systems Issues. Cardiol Rev. 2016. Jan-Feb;24(1):30–40. 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ataklte F, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Taye B, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Burden of undiagnosed hypertension in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2015. February;65(2):291–8. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cappuccio FP, Miller MA. Cardiovascular disease and hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: burden, risk and interventions. Intern Emerg Med. 2016. April;11(3):299–305. 10.1007/s11739-016-1423-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
The UNAS data that we used in this manuscript is third part data obtained from the Makerere University Lung Institute. For questions regarding data access, please see below for the primary contact for the Publication Committee of the UNAS at the Makerere University Lung Institute: Jackline Nakabira; Administrator, Makerere University Lung Institute; Email: jackienakabira@gmail.com; Phone contacts: +2560414499134 or +256775653730. Data requests may also be sent to Dr. Bruce Kirenga, at brucekirenga@yahoo.co.uk