Current serological assays for species-specific detection of anti-Chlamydia species antibodies suffer from well-known shortcomings in specificity and ease of use. Due to the high prevalences of both anti-C. trachomatis and anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies in human populations, species-specific serology is unreliable. Therefore, novel specific and simple assays for chlamydial serology are urgently needed. Conventional antigens are problematic due to extensive cross-reactivity within Chlamydia spp. Using accurate B cell epitope prediction and a robust peptide ELISA methodology developed in our laboratory, we identified immunodominant C. trachomatis B cell epitopes by screening performed with sera from C. trachomatis-infected women. We discovered 38 novel human host-dependent antigens from 20 immunodominant C. trachomatis proteins, in addition to confirming 10 host-independent mouse serum peptide antigens that had been identified previously. This extended set of highly specific C. trachomatis peptide antigens can be used in simple ELISA or multiplexed microarray formats and will provide high specificity and sensitivity to human C. trachomatis serodiagnosis.
KEYWORDS: B cell epitopes, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, ELISA, cross-reactivity, diagnosis, microimmunofluorescence, peptide antigens, serology, serovar, species-specific
ABSTRACT
Chlamydia species-specific serology is compromised by cross-reactivity of the gold standard microimmunofluorescence (MIF) or commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). This study was conducted to discover novel C. trachomatis-specific peptide antigens that were recognized only by the antibody response of the natural human host. We evaluated a library of 271 peptide antigens from immunodominant C. trachomatis proteins by reactivity with 125 C. trachomatis antibody-positive sera from women with PCR-confirmed C. trachomatis infection and 17 C. trachomatis antibody-negative sera from low-risk women never diagnosed with C. trachomatis infection. These C. trachomatis peptide antigens had been predicted in silico to contain B cell epitopes but had been nonreactive with mouse hyperimmune sera against C. trachomatis. We discovered 38 novel human host-dependent antigens from 20 immunodominant C. trachomatis proteins (PmpD, IncE, IncG, CT529, CT618, CT442, TarP, CT143, CT813, CT795, CT223, PmpC, CT875, CT579, LcrE, IncA, CT226, CT694, Hsp60, and pGP3). Using these human sera, we also confirmed 10 C. trachomatis B cell epitopes from 6 immunodominant C. trachomatis proteins (OmpA, PmpD, IncE, IncG, CT529, and CT618) as host species-independent epitopes that had been previously identified by their reactivity with mouse hyperimmune sera against C. trachomatis. ELISA reactivities against these peptides correlated strongly with the C. trachomatis microimmunofluorescence (MIF) text results (Pearson’s correlation coefficient [R] = 0.80; P < 10−6). These C. trachomatis peptide antigens do not cross-react with antibodies against other Chlamydia species and are therefore suitable for species-specific detection of antibodies against C. trachomatis. This study identified an extended set of peptide antigens for simple C. trachomatis-specific ELISA serology.
IMPORTANCE Current serological assays for species-specific detection of anti-Chlamydia species antibodies suffer from well-known shortcomings in specificity and ease of use. Due to the high prevalences of both anti-C. trachomatis and anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies in human populations, species-specific serology is unreliable. Therefore, novel specific and simple assays for chlamydial serology are urgently needed. Conventional antigens are problematic due to extensive cross-reactivity within Chlamydia spp. Using accurate B cell epitope prediction and a robust peptide ELISA methodology developed in our laboratory, we identified immunodominant C. trachomatis B cell epitopes by screening performed with sera from C. trachomatis-infected women. We discovered 38 novel human host-dependent antigens from 20 immunodominant C. trachomatis proteins, in addition to confirming 10 host-independent mouse serum peptide antigens that had been identified previously. This extended set of highly specific C. trachomatis peptide antigens can be used in simple ELISA or multiplexed microarray formats and will provide high specificity and sensitivity to human C. trachomatis serodiagnosis.
INTRODUCTION
Obligate intracellular bacteria of the genus Chlamydia infect virtually all vertebrates and cause largely chronic and asymptomatic disease conditions (1, 2). The principal human chlamydial pathogens are C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae (1, 2). C. trachomatis serovars A to C cause ocular infection and are the leading causes of preventable blindness, affecting tens of millions of people in developing countries (3). C. trachomatis serovars D to K cause genitourinary tract infections, and serovars L1 to L3 cause lymphogranuloma venereum (1, 3). Infections with C. trachomatis genital serovars remain clinically silent in most men and women, but in women, they can ascend to the upper genital tract, leading to pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy (4). The single human serovar of C. pneumoniae is a common cause of respiratory infection; such infections lead to pharyngitis, bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia (1, 2, 5) and have been associated with atherosclerosis (1, 2, 6, 7).
The remaining 9 chlamydial species have animal hosts (8, 9). C. psittaci infects birds, and C. abortus causes abortion in ruminants; both occasionally cause severe zoonotic human infection. C. felis transmitted from cats is thought to sporadically cause human follicular conjunctivitis or atypical pneumonitis (9). Other chlamydial species are endemic in swine (C. suis), ruminants (C. pecorum), and poultry (C. gallinacea), with poorly understood public health impact (8, 9). C. caviae, C. avium, and C. muridarum are found in guinea pigs, birds, and rodents, respectively, but their significance with respect to epidemiology and public health is largely unknown (8, 9).
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are most commonly used for diagnosis of chlamydial infections and for DNA sequence-based differentiation of chlamydiae (3, 6, 9–12), but they provide information only at a single point in time. In contrast, serological assays (13–20) have the power to indicate the history of exposure to an infectious agent and are generally preferable to antigen detection for epidemiological or retrospective analyses. The microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test for detection of antichlamydial antibodies has remained the gold standard since its introduction (21–26). MIF is performed as an indirect fluorescent antibody technique that enables microscopic observation of captured antibody on fixed whole chlamydial elementary bodies (EBs) (21, 23, 24, 26). This is a painstaking technique that requires extensive technical expertise, imposing a risk of high interlaboratory variation in results. The high prevalence of C. pneumoniae respiratory infection in children (27–29) complicates results of serological studies of C. trachomatis due to the possibility of seropositivity arising from a remote C. pneumoniae infection.
Several studies evaluated the suitability of C. trachomatis- or C. pneumoniae-specific ELISAs for analysis of immunodominant antigens (13–20). The majority of such antigens are highly conserved within the Chlamydia genus, and determination of suitable antigens for species-specific and sensitive ELISAs is difficult (13, 16–18). ELISAs based on whole elementary bodies (EBs), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), major outer membrane protein (MOMP), Omp2, or Hsp60 suffer from lack of specificity due to cross-reactivity of ELISA antigens (13, 16–18). The Pgp3 protein expressed by the chlamydial plasmid has been extensively studied as a candidate C. trachomatis-specific antigen (13, 18, 30–34). This plasmid protein offers the advantage that it is rarely found in human C. pneumoniae isolates (35); thus, C. pneumoniae infections would not confound the specificity of human Pgp3 C. trachomatis serology. Recently, Horner et al. (34) remedied suboptimal Pgp3 ELISA sensitivity with a double-antigen sandwich C. trachomatis Pgp3 ELISA, a method that is, however, cumbersome and labor intensive. In addition, the Pgp3 protein is present and highly conserved in most other Chlamydia spp. infecting animal hosts (35, 36) and thus cannot be used to resolve cross-reactivity concerns after human exposure to these animal chlamydiae, while it also may be absent in certain C. trachomatis strains following the loss of the plasmid (37, 38). Thus, assays that determine antibody responses against a wide spectrum of C. trachomatis-specific antigens are still needed to improve the specificity and sensitivity of C. trachomatis serology.
We previously identified Chlamydia species-specific immunodominant B cell epitopes using mouse hyperimmune sera generated by three high-dose intranasal inoculations of mice with live chlamydial organisms (39). These B cell epitopes were used as peptide antigens in ELISAs for detection of species-specific anti-Chlamydia antibodies. Reactivities of C. pecorum-specific peptide antigens were confirmed with sera from cattle, the natural host of C. pecorum (39). However, reactivity of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide antigens has not been confirmed with sera of naturally infected humans.
In the present study, we first expanded our bank of Chlamydia species-specific mouse sera to all 11 chlamydial species and used it to identify additional immunodominant B cell epitopes. We then confirmed that the mouse-identified C. trachomatis B cell epitopes (referred to as “host-independent” epitopes) are similarly immunodominant in humans, using sera from young women actively infected with C. trachomatis, many of whom also had documented a prior chlamydial genital infection(s). Since antibody responses can be influenced by host-dependent expression of protein antigens in natural versus natural hosts (40), we also sought to identify “host-dependent” C. trachomatis B cell epitopes that might be immunodominant in human infection but fail to elicit antibodies in the heterologous murine host. Since C. pneumoniae is a common infectious pathogen in children and young adults, we also utilized the human sera to probe for host-independent and -dependent B cell epitopes specific for this respiratory pathogen. Using this approach, we have identified highly species-specific C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide antigens.
RESULTS
Mouse-reactive Chlamydia species-specific peptide antigens.
Using monospecies-specific mouse antiserum pools, species-specific reactivities of Chlamydia peptide antigens were first confirmed or identified for C. avium and C. gallinacea (Fig. 1 and Table S1). The majority of peptide antigens (49 of 60; Fig. 1 and Table S1) reacted with high specificity only with homologous sera. Only 11 peptides (18%) showed cross-reactivity with 1 or more of the 10 heterologous serum pools, in addition to reacting with the corresponding homologous serum pools (Fig. 1 and Table S1). However, these cross-reactivities were observed among closely related chlamydial species, and the majority of the observed cross-reactivities were weak. These results clearly show that these peptide antigens can be used for Chlamydia species-specific detection of anti-Chlamydia antibodies.
Antibodies against Chlamydia spp. in women with C. trachomatis infections.
To ascertain the suitability of the sera for identification of immunodominant C. trachomatis B cell epitopes, the set of 60 Chlamydia species peptide antigens (Fig. 1) was tested with polyclonal anti-IgG and monoclonal anti-IgG1 and anti-IgG3 conjugates for reactivity with the C. trachomatis-positive serum pools (Fig. 2). All 10 C. trachomatis peptides showed consistently strong IgG, IgG1, and IgG3 reactivity with the C. trachomatis-positive pool (Fig. 2). This result confirmed that both long-lived IgG1 and short-lived IgG3 were present in the C. trachomatis-positive serum pool, and this finding was in agreement with the recent C. trachomatis infection history of the study subjects. None of the C. trachomatis peptide antigens showed reactivity with the C. trachomatis-negative serum pool (Fig. 2), confirming the specificity of these antigens. Further evidence for the overall specificity of peptide antigens is the fact that all 10 peptides of C. muridarum, a chlamydial species closely related to C. trachomatis, showed no cross-reactivity with the anti-C. trachomatis sera.
C. pneumoniae peptides from non-OmpA source proteins (PmpD, IncA, CT529, and CT618) showed substantial reactivities with the C. trachomatis-positive serum pools, particularly for long-lived total IgG and IgG1 antibodies (Fig. 2). These data suggest that the study human sera, particularly the sera from 125 women with active C. trachomatis infection, also retained moderate amounts of anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies. Combined with the reactivity of only a single CT529 peptide with short-lived IgG3 antibodies, these results mainly represent past C. pneumoniae infections. Importantly, weak reactivity of only a few peptide antigens of C. abortus, C. felis, C. caviae, C. pecorum, C. pecorum, and C. suis suggests sporadic exposure of human hosts to Chlamydia spp. from nonhuman hosts (Fig. 2), given that these peptide antigens showed highly species-specific reactivity with mouse sera (Fig. 1).
Reactivities of host-independent peptide antigens with anti-C. trachomatis MIF titer-ranked subpools.
To determine anti-C. trachomatis antibody-dependent signal intensity, the set of 60 mouse-reactive Chlamydia species peptides was also tested for reactivity with the four human serum subpools ranked by the C. trachomatis MIF titers of the constituent individual sera (Fig. 3). The reactivities of 10 C. trachomatis peptide antigens correlated strongly with the C. trachomatis MIF titers of 4 C. trachomatis-positive serum subpools (R = 0.80; P < 10−6) (Fig. 3). For instance, the serum subpool with the highest anti-C. trachomatis MIF titers (1:256 to 1:2,048) showed the highest reactivity with all 10 individual C. trachomatis-specific peptides (Fig. 3). Signals above background were observed for 3 C. pneumoniae peptide antigens and for 6 from 5 other chlamydial species (C. abortus, C. felis, C. suis, C. pecorum, and C. psittaci). As expected, these reactivities did not correlate with the anti-C. trachomatis MIF titers of the 4 subpools (P = 0.78). Thus, the host-independent peptide antigens of C. trachomatis, but not those of other chlamydial species, showed anti-C. trachomatis MIF titer-dependent reactivity.
Overall, these results confirmed the specific reactivity of the C. trachomatis peptide antigens (Fig. 1 to 3). Additionally, the presence of high-titer anti-C. trachomatis antibodies in the serum pools from infected women (Fig. 2 and 3) indicated that these sera were suitable for discovering additional immunodominant C. trachomatis B cell epitopes that had not previously been recognized by mouse hyperimmune sera (39). Antibodies against C. pneumoniae were the second most prevalent antichlamydial antibodies in the human sera (Fig. 2 and 3), in agreement with the high prevalence of C. pneumoniae infections in humans (1, 2, 5–7). This opened the possibility to also identify, by the use of these sera, C. pneumoniae B cell epitopes that were not recognized by anti-C. pneumoniae sera from the heterologous murine host.
Identification of host-dependent B cell epitopes of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae.
In the preceding study that identified the set of Chlamydia species-specific peptide antigens (39), many more predicted peptides did not react with hyperimmune mouse sera. Therefore, in the present study, we rescreened the C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptides of the library of mouse nonreactive antigens with the human C. trachomatis-positive and -negative serum pools. Of the 271 C. trachomatis and 153 C. pneumoniae peptides tested, the set of 38 reactive C. trachomatis and 8 reactive C. pneumoniae peptides is shown in Fig. 4. These C. trachomatis peptides reacted, almost uniformly, with the C. trachomatis-positive serum pool but not with the C. trachomatis-negative pool, indicating high specificity (Fig. 4). As expected, mouse nonreactive C. pneumoniae peptide antigens also reacted with these human serum pools (Fig. 4).
Reactivities of host-dependent peptide antigens with anti-C. trachomatis MIF titer-ranked subpools.
To determine the C. trachomatis MIF titer-dependent reactivity of the 46 host-dependent peptide antigens (Fig. 4), they were tested with the four C. trachomatis MIF titer-ranked human serum subpools (Fig. 5). Similarly to the host-independent peptides (Fig. 3), the C. trachomatis peptides, except for the Hsp60 and Pgp3 peptides, reacted most intensely with the subpool with the highest MIF titer (Fig. 5). The reactivities of C. trachomatis peptides also correlated strongly with the MIF titers of the serum subpools (R = 0.79; P < 10−6), except for Hsp60 and Pgp3 peptides. However, the reactivities of C. pneumoniae peptides did not correlate with the C. trachomatis MIF titers (P = 0.61). Thus, host-dependent peptide antigens of C. trachomatis, but not of C. pneumoniae, showed anti-C. trachomatis MIF titer-dependent reactivity.
The overall comparison of murine and human host responses to C. trachomatis proteins indicates that a much wider spectrum of proteins is recognized by the antibodies of natural human hosts of C. trachomatis (Fig. 2 to 5: OmpA, PmpD, IncE, IncG, CT529, CT618, CT442, TarP, CT143, CT813, CT795, CT223, PmpC, CT875, CT579, LcrE, IncA, CT226, CT694, Hsp60, and pGP3) than by those of natural murine hosts (Fig. 1: OmpA, PmpD, IncE, IncG, CT529, and CT618). Similarly, humans also produce antibodies against a wider range of C. pneumoniae proteins (Fig. 2 to 5: OmpA, PmpD, IncA, CT529, CT618, PmpG/I, Cpn0525, and YscC) than the natural murine hosts (Fig. 1: OmpA, PmpD, IncA, CT529, and CT618).
Ranking of candidate C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide antigens for serological assays.
Table 1 presents the summary of the serological screening results for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide antigens that may be suitable for development of species-specific serology. Ten human host-independent and 38 host-dependent peptide antigens of C. trachomatis were ranked by an overall reactivity score (Table 1; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material). Similarly, 10 human host-independent and 8 host-dependent peptide antigens of C. pneumoniae were ranked (Table 1). Only 10 C. trachomatis peptides and 10 C. pneumoniae peptides had been previously identified as B cell epitopes by their reactivity with murine hyperimmune sera (39).
TABLE 1 .
Peptidea | Sequenceb | Pooled human sera |
Mouse serum statuse | Peptide sequence % identity |
Probability of cross- reactivity (Pcross) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reactivity scorec | Rankd | C. trachomatis strainf | C. pneumoniae straing | C. suis or C. muridarumh | Chlamydia spp.i | |||
CtrOmpA_313-339 | IFDTTTLNPTIAGAGDVKTGAEGQLGD | 10.3 | 1 | + | 74 | <40 | 0.55 | 0.01 |
CtrOmpA_226-265 | NVLCNAAEFTINKPKGYVGKEFPLDLTAGTDAATGTKDAS | 8.0 | 5 | + | 94 | 55 | 0.89 | 0.09 |
CtrOmpA_152_167 | SFNLVGLFGDNENQKT | 5.4 | 27 | + | 76 | 50 | 0.29 | 0.04 |
CtrOmpA_82-105 | FQMGAKPTTDTGNSAAPSTLTARE | 3.9 | 39 | + | 64 | 40 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
CtrCT442_135-150 | VVESLSRRNSLVDQTQ | 8.9 | 2 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrIncE_81-120 | LFAISALDVLEDHGLVGCPFKLPCKSSPANEPTVQFFKGK | 8.4 | 3 | + | 97 | <40 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
CtrIncE_117-132 | FKGKNGSADKVILVTQ | 6.5 | 17 | − | 97 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpD_727-742 | EKVEEVEPAPEQKDNN | 8.2 | 4 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpD_536-565 | ARAPQALPTQEEFPLFSKKEGRPLSSGYSG | 7.7 | 6 | + | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpD_1036-65 | SGTPVQQGHAISKPEAEIESSSEPEGAHSL | 6.8 | 14 | + | 98 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpD_760-775 | QALFASEDGDLSPESS | 6.6 | 16 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrTarP_151-180 | SSNYDDAAADYEPIRTTENIYESIGGSRTS | 7.4 | 7 | − | 95 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrTarP_116-145 | TSSSDHIPSDYDDVGSNSGDISNNYDDVGS | 6.3 | 21 | − | 77 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrTarP_63-78 | TVVNYTNSASAPNVTV | 4.4 | 33 | − | 94 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrTarP_406-421 | FSKFSGDWDSLVEPMV | 3.7 | 40 | − | 90 | <40 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
CtrCT618_185-206 | GNLKQNKPTEGTSKENGFMARL | 7.4 | 8 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT618_58-73 | TVSETQQQQLSTIETT | 5.0 | 31 | + | 100 | <40 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
CtrCT618_101-122 | KTNPDGSFQLDPVSQQRTLLSP | 4.2 | 37 | − | 98 | <40 | 0.39 | 0.01 |
CtrCT143_2-27 | KKPVFTGGAPIPGISTEEGTGVKDQN | 7.3 | 9 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.20 | 0.01 |
CtrCT529_200-239 | SAERADCEARCARIAREESLLEVPGEENACEKKVAGEKAK | 7.3 | 10 | + | 96 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT529_17-32 | KAFFTQPNNKMARVVN | 4.0 | 38 | − | 97 | 44 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
CtrCT529_105-120 | SHMKAASQKTQEGDEG | 3.4 | 42 | − | 96 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
CtrCT813_235-264 | AIENLDEMAYEAMEFEKEKHGIKPGRRGSI | 7.2 | 11 | − | 97 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT813_203-232 | TVTDLEAAKQQLEEKVTDLESEKQELREEL | 6.0 | 23 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT875_398-427 | KGSTHRYAPRDDLSPEGASLAETLARFADD | 5.9 | 24 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
CtrCT795_148-163 | IMDITEIPSINPEFVE | 7.0 | 12 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
CtrCT223_5-34 | ALGTSNGVEANNGINDLSPAPEAKKTGSGL | 7.0 | 13 | − | 97 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpC_483-498 | APSLTEAESDQTDQTE | 6.8 | 15 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpC_608-637 | AIVESTPEAPEEIPPVEGEESTATEDPNSN | 6.4 | 20 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpC_272-301 | ETEQTESNGNQDGSSETEDTQVSESPESTP | 4.5 | 32 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrPmpC_1299-14 | EEQNNNDASNQGESAN | 3.7 | 41 | − | 98 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrIncG_108-147 | RPSDQQESGGRLSEESASPQASPTSSTFGLESALRSIGDS | 6.5 | 18 | + | 98 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrIncG_97-112 | KRSPEEIEGAARPSDQ | 6.4 | 19 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
CtrIncG_149-164 | SGAFDDINKDNSRSRS | 5.3 | 30 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT579_256-286 | ALDDVAGTATAVGAKATSGAASAASSAATK | 5.6 | 25 | − | 100 | 42 | 0.52 | 0.03 |
CtrCT579_100-129 | AQAVHGARDSGFNSDGSATLPSPTGTEVNG | 2.1 | 45 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.69 | 0.01 |
CtrLcrE_392-421 | RSSFSSTPPHAPVPQSEIPTSPTSTQPPSP | 5.4 | 26 | − | 99 | <40 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
CtrLcrE_242-271 | ATWEDKNHLVPCWDEETKTYNKPLLFIQML | 2.9 | 43 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
CtrCT875_228-257 | NDPLGRRTPNYQSKNPGEYTVGNSMFYDGP | 5.4 | 28 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.52 | 0.01 |
CtrCT875_486-515 | QGHYQDPRASDYDLPRASDYDLPRSPYPTP | 5.4 | 29 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
CtrIncA_234-273 | SKTLTSQIALQRKESSDLCSQIRETLSSPRKSASPSTKSS | 4.3 | 34 | − | 100 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CtrCT694_64-93 | NRGTTTTPSRPVITQANIHHPTISGQGAQP | 4.2 | 36 | − | 93 | <40 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
CtrCT694_267-296 | ENEEMNQLILGDQNGQDPQHVQDNSKELQK | 2.5 | 44 | − | 93 | <40 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
CtrCT226_147-176 | AQKSKDLELAQKKIEQLQSGLKCVLEESLI | 4.2 | 35 | − | 97 | <40 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
CtrHsp60_519-544 | TEALIAEIPEEKPAAAPAMPGAGMDY | 6.3 | 22 | − | 100 | 81 | 0.95 | 0.74 |
CtrHsp60_338-367 | EKEALEARCESIKKQIEDSSSDYDKEKLQE | 0.2 | 48 | − | 100 | 70 | 0.89 | 0.69 |
CtrpGP3_37-66 | GTKSTPVAAKMTASDGISLTVSNNSSTNAS | 2.0 | 46 | − | 96 | <40 | 0.24 | 0.07 |
CtrpGP3_198-227 | SSGVPNLCSLRTSITNTGLTPTTYSLRVGG | 0.9 | 47 | − | 97 | <40 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
CpnIncA_331-370 | QKAESEFIACVRDRTFGRRETPPPTTPVVEGDESQEEDEG | 3.5 | 1 | + | <40 | 95 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnPmpG/I_1223-38 | HGQVSYGRNHHNMTTK | 4.6 | 2 | − | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
CpnPmpG/I_947-62 | AGTTLETTTTNNTDGS | 5.2 | 3 | − | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
CpnPmpG/I_714-729 | INNTAKRSGGGIYAPK | 6.5 | 9 | − | 63 | 100 | 0.20 | 0.29 |
CpnPmpG/I_222-237 | TATDKGGGIYSKEKDS | 5.7 | 14 | − | 44 | 98 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
CpnPmpD_1131-70 | NKEETLVSAGVQINMSSPTPNKDKAVDTPVLADIISITVD | 1.7 | 4 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnPmpD_521-536 | RSNPKLEQKDSGENIN | 1.5 | 5 | − | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnPmpD_654-693 | EKSLNACSHGDHYPPKTVEEEVPPSLLEEHPVVSSTDIRG | 1.3 | 10 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnPmpD_147-186 | EKISSDTKENRKDLETEDPSKKSGLKEVSSDLPKSPETAV | 0.2 | 12 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnCT618_201-216 | PETISDPENRNKPSAE | 0.2 | 6 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnOmpA_158-173 | FGVKGTTVNANELPNV | 0.2 | 7 | + | <40 | 96 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
CpnOmpA_309-324 | AVLNLTAWNPSLLGNA | 0.2 | 15 | + | <40 | 98 | 0.01 | 0.64 |
CpnOmpA_89-104 | PTGSAAANYTTAVDRP | 0 | 16 | + | <40 | 98 | 0.01 | 0.46 |
CpnOmpA_242-257 | VAFPLPTDAGVATATG | 0 | 17 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.16 |
CpnPmpG_888-903 | LLRGSNNYVYNSNCEL | 3.3 | 8 | − | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Cpn0525_239-254 | AQENSTAKRRRRRAAV | 4.8 | 11 | − | 63 | 100 | 0.29 | 0.46 |
CpnYscC_77-92 | HTKKTTPGSIPSKVFS | 2.1 | 13 | − | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
CpnCT529_236-275 | RAKESLYNERCALENQQSQLSGDVILSAERALRKEHVATL | 1.5 | 18 | + | <40 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
A set of 48 C. trachomatis (Ctr) and 18 C. pneumoniae (Cpn) peptide antigens with highest reactivity is shown. Included are 10 each of previously identified C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae mouse serum-reactive host-independent peptides (39) and 46 top-ranked host-dependent peptides identified in this investigation by screening 424 mouse nonreactive peptides.
Only the actual chlamydial sequence of peptide antigens is shown, without the N-terminal biotin or the serine-glycine-serine-glycine spacer that is attached to each peptide (39).
Reactivity scores are weighted averages of seven values corresponding to the reactivities of total and subpooled sera as described in Materials and Methods.
The rank of each peptide within the list of 48 C. trachomatis or 18 C. pneumoniae B cell epitopes is shown. C. trachomatis rank is based on reactivity score, and C. pneumoniae rank is based on reaction frequency with 48 individual sera shown in Fig. 6.
Reactivity (+) or lack of reactivity (−) with C. trachomatis-specific or C. pneumoniae-specific hyperimmune mouse sera is shown (39).
Average percent amino acid sequence identity with 22 strains representing all major clades of C. trachomatis (Table S2) is shown. Sequences with identities below 40% typically cannot be aligned correctly, and the probability of peptide cross-reactivity is less than 1% (39).
Average percent amino acid sequence identity with 6 major strains of C. pneumoniae (Table S2) is shown.
Sequence conservation and probability of peptide antigen cross-reactivity.
The intended use of these antigens for species-specific detection of antichlamydial antibodies requires maximum divergence from all other chlamydial species but highest sequence conservation within the target species. By these criteria (<50% sequence identity [SeqID], probability of peptide cross-reactivity [Pcross] ≤ 0.04), the vast majority of these peptide antigens were highly specific for C. trachomatis and were conserved within all C. trachomatis serovars but not in the remaining Chlamydia spp. (Table 1; see also Table S2). The 30 C. trachomatis peptides from the following 16 proteins fit these criteria: CT442, IncE, PmpD, TarP, CT618, CT529, CT813, CT875, CT795, CT223, PmpC, IncG, LcrE, IncA, CT694, and CT226. The exceptions with a high likelihood of cross-reactivity with other chlamydial species were two C. trachomatis Hsp60 peptides (74% to 85% SeqID) and two pGP3 peptides (40% to 80% SeqID). In addition, 9 peptides of 7 C. trachomatis proteins (OmpA, CT618, CT143, CT529, CT579, LcrE, CT875) had Pcross values of 0.16 to 0.89 only with C. suis or C. muridarum (40% to 93% SeqID), which are closely related to C. trachomatis.
Five B cell epitope regions of the strongly reactive C. trachomatis OmpA (64% to 76% SeqID) and TarP (77% to 90% SeqID) antigens are polymorphic within C. trachomatis. As indicated in Table S2, the OmpA peptides (variable domain 1 [VD1] to VD4) showed high levels of sequence polymorphism within 22 strains that represent the major clades of C. trachomatis. The highest levels of sequence polymorphisms (Table 1; see also Table S2) were observed within the VD1 region, with only 64% average sequence identity across these 22 C. trachomatis strains (average Pcross value, ≤0.18), followed by 74% identity for VD4 (Pcross ≤ 0.42), 76% for VD2 (Pcross ≤ 0.48), and 94% for VD3 (Pcross ≤ 0.89). Therefore, these reactive regions with high levels of sequence polymorphism have the potential for use in the design of peptide antigens that discriminate among antibodies against different C. trachomatis serovariants.
In contrast, the 13 C. pneumoniae peptides of the following 9 proteins were conserved within C. pneumoniae strains but highly divergent from those of other chlamydial species: IncA, PmpD, PmpG/I, CT618, PmpG, OmpA, Cpn0525, YscC, and CT529 (Table 1; see also Table S2). The exceptions with a high likelihood of reactivity with other chlamydial species were 5 peptides from C. pneumoniae proteins PmpG/I (40% to 69% SeqID), OmpA (40% to 81% SeqID), and Cpn0525 (40% to 75% SeqID).
Reactivities of C. trachomatis- and C. pneumoniae-specific peptides with individual sera.
To further characterize peptide antigens by testing with individual rather than pooled sera, the most highly ranked 38 C. trachomatis and 18 C. pneumoniae peptides (Table 1) were tested with a panel of 48 individual serum samples from women with C. trachomatis infection (Fig. 6). Results showed that the newly identified host-dependent epitopes had reaction strengths and frequencies similar to those seen with the host-independent epitopes identified previously with mouse sera (Fig. 6; see also Table 1).
Correlation of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide reactivities and species-specific MIF titers.
Reactivity of the 48 individual sera against C. trachomatis peptide antigens (peptide sets 1 to 3 in Fig. 6) correlated significantly with the anti-C. trachomatis MIF titers of the individual sera (R = 0.56 to 0.33; P = 10−4 to 0.02; Table 2). However, the reactivities of C. trachomatis peptide set 4 (Hsp60, pGP3; Fig. 6) did not correlate with anti-C. trachomatis MIF titers (P = 0.42; Table 2). As expected, the signal intensities of all of the sets of C. trachomatis peptides (sets 1 to 4) failed to correlate with anti-C. pneumoniae MIF titers. Similarly, signals of C. pneumoniae peptides (set 5) did not correlate with anti-C. trachomatis MIF titers (P = 0.66). Surprisingly, the reactivities of C. pneumoniae peptides (set 5) did not correlate significantly with anti-C. pneumoniae MIF titers (P = 0.39). This may have been due to strong human serum reactivities with the non-OmpA proteins of C. pneumoniae but weak reactivities with OmpA antigens (major component of MIF antigens). Overall, the results in Table 2 indicate that C. trachomatis, but not C. pneumoniae, peptide reactivities correlated with the respective MIF titers (Fig. 6). As expected, the ELISA signal intensities of the C. trachomatis peptides in set 1 (Fig. 6) showed strong correlation with other C. trachomatis peptides (set 2) (R = 0.81; P = 10−6; Table 2). In contrast, the reactivities of the C. pneumoniae peptides (set 5) showed only weak correlation with the C. trachomatis peptides in set 1 (R = 0.42; P = 0.003) (Table 2).
TABLE 2 .
Peptide seta | Chlamydia species specificity | Source proteins | Antibody isotype | Correlation tob: |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. trachomatis MIF titer |
C. pneumoniae MIF titer |
Peptide set 1 |
|||||||
P | R | P | R | P | R | ||||
1 (peptides 1–11) | C. trachomatis | OmpA, TarP, CT143, PmpD. IncE, CT529, CT442, CT618 | IgG1 | 10−4 | 0.56 | 0.91 | – | – | – |
2 (peptides 12–22) | C. trachomatis | CT813, LcrE, CT226, IncE, IncG, CT223, CT618, CT795, PmpC | IgG1 | 10−3 | 0.47 | 0.20 | – | <10−6 | 0.81 |
3 (peptides 23–34) | C. trachomatis | OmpA, variable domains (VD) 1, 2, 3, 4 | IgG1 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.32 | – | 10−5 | 0.65 |
3 (peptides 23–34) | C. trachomatis | OmpA (VD1 to VD4) | IgG3 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.12 | – | 10−5 | 0.60 |
4 (peptides 35–38) | C. trachomatis | Hsp60, pGP3 | IgG1 | 0.42 | – | 0.92 | – | 0.002 | 0.44 |
5 (peptides 39–50) | C. pneumoniae | IncA, PmpD, PmpG/I, CT618, PmpG, Cpn0525, YscC | IgG1 | 0.66 | – | 0.39 | – | 0.003 | 0.42 |
Peptide sets and peptide numbers are identical to those of the peptides shown in Fig. 6.
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) and P values were calculated in linear regression analyses. The correlations are based on the mean reactivity of a peptide set with each of 48 individual sera (Fig. 6). –, absence of significant correlation or self-comparison.
Reactivities of serovariant peptides from C. trachomatis OmpA variable domain 1 (VD1) to VD4.
As shown in Fig. 6, the OmpA VD1 peptide of C. trachomatis serovar D/UW-3/CX showed IgG1 reactivity with about 44% of the individual sera (21 of 48 sera) and the VD2, VD3, and VD4 peptides with 38%, 50%, and 79% of the sera, respectively. Testing of 5 additional serovariant peptides from OmpA VD1 increased the frequency of individual serum IgG1 reactivity by 20% (65% with six OmpA VD1 serovariant peptides compared to 44% with a single serovar D VD1 peptide). The use of 3 additional serovariant peptides from OmpA VD4 increased the reactivity frequency by only 4% (83% for four VD4 serovariant peptides compared to 79% with one serovar D VD4 peptide). Reactivities of short-lived IgG3 were almost identical to those of long-lived IgG1, except for distinct differences in some individuals (Fig. 6). These exceptions suggest a potential to distinguish current/recent infections indicated by the presence of IgG3 antibodies from past infections indicated by the presence of IgG1 antibodies. Interestingly, the six serovariant peptides from C. trachomatis OmpA VD1 generated infrequent but distinct signals (Fig. 6). In contrast, the OmpA VD4 peptides showed frequent and common reactivities. Combined with sequence polymorphism data (Table 1; see also Table S2), this result suggests that the use of several serovariant peptides from the highly polymorphic OmpA VD1 region may identify C. trachomatis serovar-specific antibodies and that assaying just a few variant peptides from OmpA VD3 and VD4 may allow detection of all anti-C. trachomatis antibodies.
C. pneumoniae OmpA and non-OmpA peptide reactivities.
In contrast to the highly reactive C. trachomatis OmpA peptide antigens (Fig. 6), C. pneumoniae OmpA peptides 53 to 56 showed rare and weak reactivity that was much weaker and less frequent than the reactivity seen with dominant peptides 39 to 47 from other C. pneumoniae proteins. All four OmpA variable-domain peptides and the non-OmpA peptides (IncA, PmpD, PmpG/I, CT618, PmpG, Cpn0525, and YscC) (Fig. 6) were highly conserved across all strains of C. pneumoniae (95% to 100% sequence identity) (Pcross, ≤0.91 to 0.95) (Table 1; see also Table S2). Several of those C. pneumoniae non-OmpA peptides (IncA, PmpD, PmpG/I, and CT618; Fig. 6) showed frequent detection of anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we first reconfirmed the specificities of 60 peptide antigens from the 11 Chlamydia spp. (39), using Chlamydia monospecies-specific hyperimmune mouse sera (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Subsequent testing of these peptides with the human C. trachomatis-positive and -negative sera confirmed the C. trachomatis-specific reactivity of these peptides with human sera and established the mouse/human host-independent nature of the chlamydial B cell epitopes (Fig. 1, 2, and 3). Next, by screening large numbers of additional C. trachomatis candidate peptide antigens with human sera (Table 1), we identified novel human host-dependent B cell epitope peptide antigens of C. trachomatis that had not previously reacted with mouse anti-C. trachomatis hyperimmune sera (Fig. 4 and 5). Additionally, using the previously identified mouse species-specific peptide antigens (39), we confirmed the presence of both anti-C. pneumoniae and anti-C. trachomatis antibodies in these human sera (Fig. 6). Again, by screening a large number of additional C. pneumoniae candidate peptide antigens with the human sera (Table 1), we identified novel human host-dependent C. pneumoniae B cell epitope peptide antigens (Fig. 4 and 5).
These experiments conclusively established the concept of human host-dependent antibody responses against certain immunodominant B cell epitopes of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. Overall, the identification of many human host-dependent B cell epitopes from two natural human chlamydial pathogens confirmed the concept that the range of antibody responses to chlamydiae in the natural host species is wider than in the experimental murine host (40).
Compared to the frequent reactivities of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae peptide antigens (Fig. 2 to 5), only few antigens from C. abortus, C. felis, C. pecorum, and C. psittaci produced ELISA signals, and the signals that those few produced were very weak (Fig. 2 and 3), suggesting sporadic exposure of the human hosts to those animal Chlamydia spp. Additionally, all 10 peptide antigens from C. muridarum were nonreactive with the study sera (Fig. 2 and 3), despite the high anti-C. trachomatis antibody levels in the C. trachomatis-positive serum pool. This indicates that these C. muridarum peptide antigens do not cross-react with anti-C. trachomatis antibodies, despite minimal evolutionary divergence between these two chlamydial species. Similarly, reactivity of peptides of C. suis, another species closely related to C. trachomatis, was essentially absent compared to that seen with C. trachomatis (Fig. 2 and 3). These results clearly indicate that these peptides are highly species-specific antigens (Fig. 2).
With the completion of this study, we report now an expanded set of peptide antigens that may be valuable in serodiagnosis of human chlamydial infections (Table 1). These peptide antigens are sufficiently divergent to eliminate virtually any cross-reactivity among antibodies against other Chlamydia spp. (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Derived from the most strongly reactive regions of immunodominant proteins identified in the chlamydial proteome (40–43), they produce very strong ELISA signals under conditions of detection with anti-human antibody conjugates (Fig. 6). The distinguishing characteristic of these peptide antigens is that they react highly specifically with their cognate antibodies and can therefore be used in assays for species- and even serovar-specific detection of antibodies against C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. This fills a distinctive void among Chlamydia antibody assays for effective species/type-specific detection of antichlamydial antibodies (13–20, 44–48).
A clear absence of reactivity to certain peptides in individual serum samples (“hole in antibody repertoire”), but strong reactivity to others (Fig. 6), points to the molecular uncertainty principle of the antibody response. We attribute this to the stochastic “roll of the dice” nature of immunoglobulin gene recombination (49), which may have failed to create even a single B cell receptor molecule that bound to a B cell epitope, preventing epitope-specific B cell expansion and antibody affinity maturation. These data strongly argue that combined results from multiple peptide antigens, preferably from several proteins, will be required for accurate anti-C. trachomatis antibody detection that approximates the quantitative accuracy of methods using complex multiepitope antigens.
C. trachomatis-seropositive individuals show holes in the antibody repertoire not only against individual peptide antigens but also against whole-protein antigens (40–43, 50–53). Thus, the molecular uncertainty principle of the antibody response applies also to proteins. The use of single antigens in serology therefore inherently compromises sensitivity as well as quantitative accuracy. These disadvantageous performance characteristics of the use of single protein or peptide antigens may inherently impede their suggested use in programs for control and monitoring for trachoma, sexually transmitted infections (STI), or community-acquired pneumonia (52–56).
Interestingly, C. pneumoniae OmpA peptides were strongly reactive with anti-C. pneumoniae mouse sera (Fig. 1), but not with human sera (Fig. 6), while C. trachomatis OmpA peptides reacted strongly with anti-C. trachomatis mouse sera as well as human sera (Fig. 1 and 6). In agreement with these findings, Campbell et al. reported that rabbit anti-C. pneumoniae immune sera recognized C. pneumoniae OmpA poorly but that C. trachomatis immune sera dominantly recognized the respective OmpA proteins (57). These results may explain the finding that anti-C. trachomatis but not anti-C. pneumoniae MIF titers correlated significantly with the corresponding species-specific peptide reactivities (Table 2), since OmpA is the dominant MIF antigen. In agreement with the previous findings (29, 57), these results suggest that the C. trachomatis but not the C. pneumoniae OmpA peptides would be suitable for sensitive antibody detection in serological assays.
Synthetic OmpA peptides have been tested before for Chlamydia species-specific serology, and OmpA peptide-based assays provided specificity but lacked sensitivity (58–61). However, those studies used short, spacerless peptide antigens, resulting in low sensitivity that was most likely due to weak antibody binding to the short peptides (62) and/or to steric hindrance of antibody binding (63). Recently, several groups have attempted to identify non-OmpA peptide antigens for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae serology and to use levels of antibody against 1 to 3 of these peptides as markers for disease (64, 65). However, those assays had low sensitivity, possibly because the peptides do not represent immunodominant B cell epitopes. Therefore, given that only a fraction of Chlamydia-infected individuals respond, those assays are inherently of limited use as disease markers. And even if the epitopes were immunodominant, use of multiple antigens is required for sensitive detection of a wide repertoire of anti-C. trachomatis antibodies, as results determined by us and others (40, 41) indicate (Fig. 6).
These synthetic peptide antigens can be readily commercialized in the standard ELISA format as well as in the microarray format (63, 66, 67), and such assays may become widely available tools for chlamydial serology. In a recent study (66), we detected species- and serovar-specific antibodies against Chlamydia spp. by a peptide microarray that used several of the peptide antigens described here (Fig. 1; see also Table 1). With the possibility of spotting 196 to 784 peptides on a single chip (67), such microarrays offer unprecedented opportunities for Chlamydia species serology by reducing the need for labor-intensive multipeptide ELISAs. Averaged microarray signals of multiple peptide antigens may reliably quantify the overall antichlamydial antibody response, and specific seroreactivity patterns of individual peptides may be associated with a risk of sequelae following chlamydial infection. In conclusion, these peptide antigens will improve C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae serology and will thereby help to more accurately diagnose infections and sequelae and aid in C. trachomatis surveillance and control programs (30–34, 50, 59, 68).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mouse sera.
Chlamydia monospecies-specific mouse sera for each of the 11 Chlamydia spp. were used to confirm the specificity of peptide antigens for detection of species-specific antibody. Nine of such hyperimmune sera had been raised in our previous study (39), but additional C. avium- and C. gallinacea-specific sera were raised in the current study. Briefly, EB suspensions of C. avium strain 10DC88 and C. gallinacea strain 08-1274/3 were intranasally inoculated in A/J mice as described previously (39). Sera of 9 to 50 animals infected with C. avium or C. gallinacea were collected into a monospecies-specific serum pool. All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Auburn University.
Human sera.
Sera were collected from 125 women with C. trachomatis infection confirmed by NAAT (69) and from 18 healthy, low-risk women who were never diagnosed with C. trachomatis infection. Chlamydia trachomatis MIF titers (A to I, K, and L1 to L3 antigens) were determined for 108 of the 125 C. trachomatis NAAT-positive women at the University of Washington, and 106 were also tested for C. pneumoniae (TW183 antigen) (21–24, 26). Serum samples from 18 healthy women at low risk for C. trachomatis exposure were tested for antibodies against C. trachomatis by an ELISA using a C. trachomatis EB antigen (GenWay Biotech, Inc., San Diego, CA). Seventeen anti-C. trachomatis EB antibody-negative sera were included in this study as C. trachomatis-negative-control sera, and a single positive serum sample was excluded. These samples from the 17 women at low risk for C. trachomatis infection were not tested by MIF. The chlamydial antibody status of all human sera was also characterized by the reactivity with mouse serum-reactive peptide antigens of all 11 chlamydial species.
Among the 125 C. trachomatis-positive women, 74 were African American, 28 were Caucasian, and 23 were Hispanic, Asian, or mixed race. The 17 C. trachomatis-negative healthy women were all Caucasian but were of similar age to the C. trachomatis-positive serum donors. The study protocol was approved by both the Institutional Review Boards for Human Research of the University of Pittsburgh and the University of North Carolina. All participants provided written informed consent at the time of enrollment.
Pooling of human sera.
Aliquots of serum from the 125 women diagnosed with C. trachomatis were pooled and are referred to here as the C. trachomatis-positive pooled sera. Serum aliquots from the 17 women never diagnosed with C. trachomatis were similarly pooled and are referred to here as the C. trachomatis-negative pooled sera. The C. trachomatis MIF titer for 108 C. trachomatis-infected women was known at study onset, and these 108 samples were used to prepare four serum subpools ranked by C. trachomatis MIF titer. The serum subpools were prepared by mixing equal proportions of 19, 21, 33, and 35 serum samples from women with C. trachomatis MIF titers of 1:4 to 1:8, 1:16 to 1:32, 1:64 to 1:128, and 1:128 to 1:1,048, respectively. To identify additional peptide antigens that showed host-dependent reactivity with human sera, we used the human serum pool or subpools of 125 C. trachomatis-positive and 17 C. trachomatis-negative women to screen a large panel of 271 C. trachomatis and 153 C. pneumoniae peptides that had been nonreactive with mouse sera.
Peptide antigens.
The B cell epitope prediction approach has been described in detail in preceding studies (39, 62). In brief, we first identified and ranked 72 immunodominant proteins among all chlamydial proteomes on the basis of published data (40–43). On the basis of alignments of each of these 72 individual proteins, suitable regions for identification of genus-, species-, and serovar-specific epitope candidates were further subjected to in silico B cell epitope analyses (62). The majority of the peptide antigens were selected from polymorphic protein regions for species-specific reactivity and smaller numbers from highly polymorphic regions (serovar-specific reactivity) or conserved regions (genus-specific reactivity). Conserved B cell epitopes that corresponded to a given Chlamydia species but were divergent from those of other Chlamydia spp. were selected for analyses of the species specificity of the peptide antigens. Divergent B cell epitopes within a Chlamydia species were selected for serovar-specific reactivity.
Peptide antigens were chemically synthesized with N-terminal biotin followed by a serine-glycine-serine-glycine spacer and captured on streptavidin-coated white microtiter plates (Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark). For antigen optimization of some B cell epitope regions, they were scanned by the use of 16-to-40-mer peptides overlapping by 4 to 12 amino acids (aa), and peptides of different lengths corresponding to regions showing peak reactivity were tested to maximize reactivity.
ELISA.
Primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies in chemiluminescent ELISAs. Overall methods were employed as described in detail by Rahman et al. (39) with the following modifications. The wash buffer consisted of 0.15 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.025% Tween 20, and 0.001% benzalkonium chloride. The assay diluent consisted of 0.125 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.025% Tween 20, 2% rabbit serum, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% casein, 0.2% polyethylene glycol, and 0.005% benzalkonium chloride. The blocking buffer consisted of 0.125 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2% rabbit serum, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% casein, 0.2% polyethylene glycol, and 0.005% benzalkonium chloride. A polyclonal rabbit anti-human IgG-h+l cross-adsorbed antibody-HRP conjugate was obtained from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX) (catalog no. A80-218P). The following monoclonal mouse anti-human antibody conjugates were purchased from Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL: IgG1 hinge-HRP (catalog no. 9052-05) and IgG3 hinge-HRP (catalog no. 9210-05).
Chemiluminescent detection was chosen because of the signal linearity over 4 to 5 orders of magnitude, and light emission was measured as relative light units (RLU) per second. Background signals were determined for wells without peptide antigen and wells coated with nonspecific peptide antigens (39). The differences between all background signals and all peptide signals were analyzed by one-tailed paired Student’s t test. This analysis established that peptide signal correction by subtraction of the background mean value plus 3 standard deviations allowed unequivocal identification of reactive peptides. The polyclonal signal value was expressed as the base value × 103 for comparative displays, since polyclonal anti-human Ig conjugates produced higher chemiluminescent signals than monoclonal Ig conjugates.
Confirmation of peptide antigens with monospecies-specific anti-Chlamydia mouse serum pools.
A set of previously reported (39) and new peptide antigens from each of the 11 Chlamydia spp. was first tested with monospecies-specific anti-Chlamydia hyperimmune mouse serum pools. Peptide antigens that reacted with the homologous anti-Chlamydia serum pool were further tested with the remaining 10 heterologous species-specific mouse serum pools to determine specificity and cross-reactivity.
Testing of mouse-reactive peptide antigens of 11 Chlamydia spp. with human serum pools.
A set of 60 mouse-reactive peptide antigens of all 11 Chlamydia spp. was further tested with the pools of C. trachomatis-positive and -negative human sera by using polyclonal anti-human IgG. For confirmation of the presence of and determination of the levels of bound antibody isotypes, reactive peptide antigens were also tested by use of monoclonal conjugates against long-lived IgG1 and short-lived IgG3 antibodies. To determine anti-C. trachomatis MIF titer-dependent signal intensities, these peptide antigens were further tested with the 4 C. trachomatis MIF titer-dependent human serum subpools by using the human anti-IgG conjugate.
Testing of mouse reactive C. trachomatis peptide antigens with human serum pools.
A large panel of 271 mouse serum-reactive C. trachomatis peptides, predicted as high-scoring B cell epitopes, was first tested with the human serum pool of C. trachomatis-positive sera by using the anti-human IgG polyclonal conjugate. Reactive peptides were further tested as described above for mouse reactive peptides.
Ranking of C. trachomatis peptide antigens.
C. trachomatis peptides that reacted with the C. trachomatis-positive serum pool but not with the C. trachomatis-negative pool were ranked by an arbitrary reactivity score corresponding to the C. trachomatis-positive serum pool. These scores were determined by combining 7 weighted signal intensities of serum samples as follows—(i) 1/6 weight of the level of polyclonal anti-IgG conjugate reactivity with the pool of 125 serum samples from C. trachomatis-infected women; (ii) 1/12 weight for each polyclonal anti-IgG conjugate reactivity of the 4 MIF titer subpools; and (iii) 1/4 weight each for monoclonal anti-IgG1 and anti-IgG3 conjugate reactivities with the positive serum pool. This approach balanced all reactivities of serum total and subpools and weighted the data from the polyclonal and monoclonal conjugates equally.
Reactivity of C. trachomatis peptide antigens with 48 individual human sera.
As a final confirmation of the identifications of the novel peptide antigen reagents, the top-ranked peptide antigens of C. trachomatis were tested for IgG1 and IgG3 reactivity with individual serum samples from 48 C. trachomatis-infected women. The serum samples were selected based on their distribution across the complete spectrum of C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae MIF titers, proportional representation of racial origin of the study subjects, and available volume. All tests were performed by using single peptide antigens per well with a single serum sample and a single conjugate.
Testing of mouse reactive C. pneumoniae peptide antigens with human sera.
To determine and contrast the reactivities of C. pneumoniae peptide antigens and C. trachomatis peptide reactivities, a panel of 153 C. pneumoniae peptide antigens was similarly tested with both C. trachomatis-positive human serum pools and C. trachomatis-negative pools as described above for the C. trachomatis peptide antigens. All 153 C. pneumoniae peptides were initially ranked by combining 7 weighted signal intensities of serum samples as described for C. trachomatis. A set of 18 top-ranked C. pneumoniae peptides was then tested with a panel of 48 individual sera, and the final rank was determined based on the frequency of positive reactivities with these 48 individual sera.
Statistical analyses.
All statistical analyses were performed and graphical outputs were generated by the use of Microsoft Excel 2016 or the software package Statistica 7.1 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). To determine the relationships between continuous variables, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) values were calculated in linear and polynomial regression analyses from the square root of R2. R values of 0.01 to 0.30 were considered to represent very weak correlations, 0.30 to 0.50 weak correlations, 0.50 to 0.70 moderately strong correlations, 0.70 to 0.90 strong correlations, and 0.90 to 1.00 very strong correlations.
The probability of peptide cross-reactivity (Pcross) was calculated as follows: Pcross = e(−9.4153 + 0.123223 × percent sequence identity)/[1 + e(−9.4153 + 0.123223 × percent sequence identity)]. At 45%, 60%, 75%, and 90% sequence identity (%SeqID), this translates to Pcross values of 0.02, 0.12, 0.46, and 0.84, respectively. This probability of cross-reactivity of peptide antigens with antibodies against a heterologous B cell epitope had been described earlier based on a large experimental data set (39). It is derived by logistic regression analysis of the observed cross-reactivity of chlamydial peptides with monospecies-specific serum samples against other chlamydial species and the percentage of sequence identity with the corresponding peptide antigens of the respective other chlamydial species (39).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grant 103 from the Auburn University Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory to K.S.R. and by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants U19 AI084024 and R01 AI119164.
Footnotes
For a companion article on this topic, see https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00253-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kuo CC, Stephens RS, Bavoil PM, Kaltenboeck B. 2011. Genus I. Chlamydia Jones, Rake and Stearns 1945, 55AL, p 846–865. In Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 4, 2nd ed Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leonard CA, Borel N. 2014. Chronic chlamydial diseases: from atherosclerosis to urogenital infections. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep 1:61. doi: 10.1007/s40588-014-0005-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pedersen LN, Herrmann B, Møller JK. 2009. Typing Chlamydia trachomatis: from egg yolk to nanotechnology. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 55:120–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Darville T, Hiltke TJ. 2010. Pathogenesis of genital tract disease due to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis 201:S114–S125. doi: 10.1086/652397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grayston JT, Kuo C-C, Campbell LA, Wang S-P. 1989. Chlamydia pneumoniae sp. nov. for Chlamydia sp. strain TWAR. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:88–90. doi: 10.1099/00207713-39-1-88. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boman J, Hammerschlag MR. 2002. Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: critical assessment of diagnostic methods and relevance to treatment studies. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:1–20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.1-20.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuo CC, Shor A, Campbell LA, Fukushi H, Patton DL, Grayston JT. 1993. Demonstration of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. J Infect Dis 167:841–849. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.4.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hulin V, Oger S, Vorimore F, Aaziz R, de Barbeyrac B, Berruchon J, Sachse K, Laroucau K. 2015. Host preference and zoonotic potential of Chlamydia psittaci and C. gallinacea in poultry. Pathog Dis 73:1–11. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftv005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rodolakis A, Yousef Mohamad KY. 2010. Zoonotic potential of Chlamydophila. Vet Microbiol 140:382–391. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de Vries HJ, Schim van der Loeff MFS, Bruisten SM. 2015. High-resolution typing of Chlamydia trachomatis: epidemiological and clinical uses. Curr Opin Infect Dis 28:61–71. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Black CM, Fields PI, Messmer TO, Berdal BP. 1994. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction using nested primers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13:752–756. doi: 10.1007/BF02276060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sachse K, Laroucau K, Vorimore F, Magnino S, Feige J, Müller W, Kube S, Hotzel H, Schubert E, Slickers P, Ehricht R. 2009. DNA microarray-based genotyping of Chlamydophila psittaci strains from culture and clinical samples. Vet Microbiol 135:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bas S, Muzzin P, Ninet B, Bornand JE, Scieux C, Vischer TL. 2001. Chlamydial serology: comparative diagnostic value of immunoblotting, microimmunofluorescence test, and immunoassays using different recombinant proteins as antigens. J Clin Microbiol 39:1368–1377. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1368-1377.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wong YK, Sueur JM, Fall CH, Orfila J, Ward ME. 1999. The species specificity of the microimmunofluorescence antibody test and comparisons with a time resolved fluoroscopic immunoassay for measuring IgG antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Clin Pathol 52:99–102. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.2.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peeling RW, Wang SP, Grayston JT, Blasi F, Boman J, Clad A, Freidank H, Gaydos CA, Gnarpe J, Hagiwara T, Jones RB, Orfila J, Persson K, Puolakkainen M, Saikku P, Schachter J. 2000. Chlamydia pneumoniae serology: interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results. J Infect Dis 181:S426–S429. doi: 10.1086/315603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haralambieva I, Iankov I, Petrov D, Ivanova R, Kamarinchev B, Mitov I. 2001. Cross-reaction between the genus-specific lipopolysaccharide antigen of Chlamydia spp. and the lipopolysaccharides of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Escherichia coli O119 and Salmonella newington: implications for diagnosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 41:99–106. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(01)00299-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kern DG, Neill MA, Schachter J. 1993. A seroepidemiologic study of Chlamydia pneumoniae in Rhode Island. Evidence of serologic cross-reactivity. Chest 104:208–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bas S, Muzzin P, Vischer TL. 2001. Chlamydia trachomatis serology: diagnostic value of outer membrane protein 2 compared with that of other antigens. J Clin Microbiol 39:4082–4085. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4082-4085.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagenvoort JHT, Koumans D, Van de Cruijs M. 1999. How useful is the Chlamydia micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test for the gynaecologist? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 84:13–15. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00303-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tuuminen T, Palomäki P, Paavonen J. 2000. The use of serologic tests for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. J Microbiol Methods 42:265–279. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00209-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang SP, Grayston JT. 1970. Immunologic relationship between genital TRIC, lymphogranuloma venereum, and related organisms in a new microtiter indirect immunofluorescence test. Am J Ophthalmol 70:367–374. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(70)90096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang SP, Kuo CC, Grayston JT. 1973. A simplified method for immunological typing of trachoma-inclusion conjunctivitis-lymphogranuloma venereum organisms. Infect Immun 7:356–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang SP, Grayston JT. 1974. Human serology in Chlamydia trachomatis infection with microimmunofluorescence. J Infect Dis 130:388–397. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.4.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang S-p. 2000. The microimmunofluorescence test for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: technique and interpretation. J Infect Dis 181:S421–S425. doi: 10.1086/315622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Persson K, Boman J. 2000. Comparison of five serologic tests for diagnosis of acute infections by Chlamydia pneumoniae. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7:739–744. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.5.739-744.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dowell SF, Peeling RW, Boman J, Carlone GM, Fields BS, Guarner J, Hammerschlag MR, Jackson LA, Kuo CC, Maass M, Messmer TO, Talkington DF, Tondella ML, Zaki SR; C. pneumoniae Workshop Participants. 2001. Standardizing Chlamydia pneumoniae assays: recommendations from the centers for disease control and prevention (USA) and the laboratory centre for disease control (Canada). Clin Infect Dis 33:492–503. doi: 10.1086/322632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hammerschlag MR. 2003. Pneumonia due to Chlamydia pneumoniae in children: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pediatr Pulmonol 36:384–390. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Block S, Hedrick J, Hammerschlag MR, Cassell GH, Craft JC. 1995. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: comparative efficacy and safety of clarithromycin vs. erythromycin ethylsuccinate. Pediatr Infect Dis J 14:471–477. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199506000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kutlin A, Roblin PM, Hammerschlag MR. 1998. Antibody response to Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in children with respiratory illness. J Infect Dis 177:720–724. doi: 10.1086/514223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.West SK, Munoz B, Weaver J, Mrango Z, Dize L, Gaydos C, Quinn TC, Martin DL. 2016. Can we use antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis as a surveillance tool for national trachoma control programs? Results from a district survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Woodhall SC, Wills GS, Horner PJ, Craig R, Mindell JS, Murphy G, McClure MO, Soldan K, Nardone A, Johnson AM. 2017. Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 antibody population seroprevalence before and during an era of widespread opportunistic Chlamydia screening in England (1994–2012). PLoS One 12:e0152810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.West SK, Munoz B, Kaur H, Dize L, Mkocha H, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC. 2018. Longitudinal change in the serology of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis pgp3 in children residing in a trachoma area. Sci Rep 8:3520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21127-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaur H, Dize L, Munoz B, Gaydos C, West SK. 2018. Evaluation of the reproducibility of a serological test for antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis pgp3: a potential surveillance tool for trachoma programs. J Microbiol Methods 147:56–58. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Horner PJ, Wills GS, Righarts A, Vieira S, Kounali D, Samuel D, Winston A, Muir D, Dickson NP, McClure MO. 2016. Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 antibody persists and correlates with self-reported infection and behavioural risks in a blinded cohort study. PLoS One 11:e0151497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Myers GSA, Mathews SA, Eppinger M, Mitchell C, O’Brien KK, White OR, Benahmed F, Brunham RC, Read TD, Ravel J, Bavoil PM, Timms P. 2009. Evidence that human Chlamydia pneumoniae was zoonotically acquired. J Bacteriol 191:7225–7233. doi: 10.1128/JB.00746-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Donati M, Laroucau K, Storni E, Mazzeo C, Magnino S, Di Francesco A, Baldelli R, Ceglie L, Renzi M, Cevenini R. 2009. Serological response to pgp3 protein in animal and human chlamydial infections. Vet Microbiol 135:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stothard DR, Williams JA, Van Der Pol B, Jones RB. 1998. Identification of a Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E urogenital isolate which lacks the cryptic plasmid. Infect Immun 66:6010–6013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schachter J. 2007. The Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid deletion mutant—what does it mean to us? Sex Transm Dis 34:257. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31805d0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rahman KS, Chowdhury EU, Poudel A, Ruettger A, Sachse K, Kaltenboeck B. 2015. Defining species-specific immunodominant B cell epitopes for molecular serology of Chlamydia species. Clin Vaccine Immunol 22:539–552. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00102-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang J, Zhang Y, Lu C, Lei L, Yu P, Zhong G. 2010. A genome-wide profiling of the humoral immune response to Chlamydia trachomatis infection reveals vaccine candidate antigens expressed in humans. J Immunol 185:1670–1680. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bunk S, Susnea I, Rupp J, Summersgill JT, Maass M, Stegmann W, Schrattenholz A, Wendel A, Przybylski M, Hermann C. 2008. Immunoproteomic identification and serological responses to novel Chlamydia pneumoniae antigens that are associated with persistent C. pneumoniae infections. J Immunol 180:5490–5498. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Z, Chen C, Chen D, Wu Y, Zhong Y, Zhong G. 2008. Characterization of fifty putative inclusion membrane proteins encoded in the Chlamydia trachomatis genome. Infect Immun 76:2746–2757. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00010-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yasui Y, Yanatori I, Kawai Y, Miura K, Suminami Y, Hirota T, Tamari M, Ouchi K, Kishi F. 2012. Genomic screening for Chlamydophila pneumoniae-specific antigens using serum samples from patients with primary infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 329:168–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maass M, Gieffers J, Krause E, Engel PM, Bartels C, Solbach W. 1998. Poor correlation between microimmunofluorescence serology and polymerase chain reaction for detection of vascular Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in coronary artery disease patients. Med Microbiol Immunol 187:103–106. doi: 10.1007/s004300050080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Berger M, Schröder B, Daeschlein G, Schneider W, Busjahn A, Buchwalow I, Luft FC, Haller H. 2000. Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in coronary atherosclerotic plaques and circulating leukocytes. J Lab Clin Med 136:194–200. doi: 10.1067/mlc.2000.108941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Coppus SFPJ, Van Geloven N, Alves MFC, Ånestad G, Bhattacharya S, Allan J, Guerra-Infante MF, Den Hartog JE, Land JA, Idahl A, Van der Linden PJ, Mouton JW, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Svenstrup HF, Tiitinen A, Toye B, Van der Veen F, Mol BW. 2011. Chlamydia antibody testing and diagnosing tubal pathology in subfertile women: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 17:301–310. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ieven MM, Hoymans VY. 2005. Involvement of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerosis: more evidence for lack of evidence. J Clin Microbiol 43:19–24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.19-24.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Puolakkainen M. 2013. Laboratory diagnosis of persistent human chlamydial infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3:99. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brack C, Hirama M, Lenhard-Schuller RL, Tonegawa S. 1978. A complete immunoglobulin gene is created by somatic recombination. Cell 15:1–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90078-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wills GS, Horner PJ, Reynolds R, Johnson AM, Muir DA, Brown DW, Winston A, Broadbent AJ, Parker D, McClure MO. 2009. Pgp3 antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a sensitive and specific assay for seroepidemiological analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16:835–843. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00021-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Skwor T, Kandel RP, Basravi S, Khan A, Sharma B, Dean D. 2010. Characterization of humoral immune responses to chlamydial HSP60, CPAF, and CT795 in inflammatory and severe trachoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5128–5136. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-5113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Goodhew EB, Priest JW, Moss DM, Zhong G, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Martin DL, West SK, Gaydos C, Lammie PJ. 2012. CT694 and pgp3 as serological tools for monitoring trachoma programs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Horner P, Soldan K, Vieira SM, Wills GS, Woodhall SC, Pebody R, Nardone A, Stanford E, McClure MO. 2013. C. trachomatis pgp3 antibody prevalence in young women in England, 1993–2010. PLoS One 8:e72001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Martin DL, Bid R, Sandi F, Goodhew EB, Massae PA, Lasway A, Philippin H, Makupa W, Molina S, Holland MJ, Mabey DC, Drakeley C, Lammie PJ, Solomon AW. 2015. Serology for trachoma surveillance after cessation of mass drug administration. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0003555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gwyn S, Mitchell A, Dean D, Mkocha H, Handali S, Martin DL. 2016. Lateral flow-based antibody testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. J Immunol Methods 435:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hvidsten D, Halvorsen DS, Berdal BP, Gutteberg TJ. 2009. Chlamydophila pneumoniae diagnostics: importance of methodology in relation to timing of sampling. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:42–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Campbell LA, Kuo CC, Grayston JT. 1990. Structural and antigenic analysis of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Infect Immun 58:93–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Närvänen A, Puolakkainen M, Hao W, Kino K, Suni J. 1997. Detection of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis with peptide-based species-specific enzyme immunoassay. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 5:349–354. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bas S, Genevay S, Schenkel MC, Vischer TL. 2002. Importance of species-specific antigens in the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis reactive arthritis. Rheumatology 41:1017–1020. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.9.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Morré SA, Munk C, Persson K, Krüger-Kjaer S, van Dijk R, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ. 2002. Comparison of three commercially available peptide-based immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA assays to microimmunofluorescence assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 40:584–587. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.584-587.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Klein M, Kötz A, Bernardo K, Krönke M. 2003. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific antibodies binding to the VD2 and VD3 regions of the major outer membrane protein. J Clin Microbiol 41:1957–1962. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1957-1962.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rahman KhS, Chowdhury EU, Sachse K, Kaltenboeck B. 2016. Inadequate reference datasets biased toward short non-epitopes confound B-cell epitope prediction. J Biol Chem 291:14585–14599. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.729020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Andresen H, Grötzinger C, Zarse K, Kreuzer OJ, Ehrentreich-Förster E, Bier FF. 2006. Functional peptide microarrays for specific and sensitive antibody diagnostics. Proteomics 6:1376–1384. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stansfield SH, Patel P, Debattista J, Armitage CW, Cunningham K, Timms P, Allan J, Mittal A, Huston WM. 2013. Proof of concept: a bioinformatic and serological screening method for identifying new peptide antigens for chlamydia trachomatis related sequelae in women. Results Immunol 3:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.rinim.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Menon S, Stansfield SH, Logan B, Hocking JS, Timms P, Rombauts L, Allan JA, Huston WM. 2016. Development and evaluation of a multi-antigen peptide ELISA for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis-related infertility in women. J Med Microbiol 65:915–922. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sachse K, Rahman KS, Schnee C, Müller E, Peisker M, Schumacher T, Schubert E, Ruettger A, Kaltenboeck B, Ehricht R. 2018. A novel synthetic peptide microarray assay detects Chlamydia species-specific antibodies in animal and human sera. Sci Rep 8:4701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ehricht R, Adelhelm K, Monecke S, Huelseweh B. 2009. Application of protein arraytubes to bacteria, toxin, and biological warfare agent detection. Methods Mol Biol 509:85–105. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-372-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Solomon AW. 2006. World Health Organization and International Trachoma Initiative. Trachoma control: a guide for programme managers. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43405/9241546905_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E324284267101B9F7B60C38EFA558E7F?sequence=1.
- 69.Russell AN, Zheng X, O’Connell CM, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Taylor BD, Picard MD, Flechtner JB, Zhong W, Frazer LC, Darville T. 2016. Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens recognized by T cells from highly exposed women who limit or resist genital tract infection. J Infect Dis 214:1884–1892. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.