Skip to main content
MedChemComm logoLink to MedChemComm
. 2017 Jun 22;8(8):1655–1658. doi: 10.1039/c7md00165g

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine derivatives as potent antiproliferative agents

Zhong-Hua Li a, Xue-Qi Liu a, Peng-Fei Geng a, Jin-Lian Ma a, Tao-Qian Zhao a, Hao-Ming Wei a, Bin Yu a,, Hong-Min Liu a,
PMCID: PMC6071795  PMID: 30108876

graphic file with name c7md00165g-ga.jpgThe thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine derivative 7i exhibited potent inhibition against MGC-803 and HGC-27 with IC50 values of 4.64 and 5.07 μM, respectively and around 12-fold selectivity between MGC-803 and GES-1.

Abstract

A series of thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activities against several human cancer cell lines. Structure–activity relationship studies were carried out, showing that most of the target compounds had good inhibition against the tested cell lines. Among them, compound 7i exhibited potent inhibition against human gastric cancer cells MGC-803 and HGC-27 with IC50 values of 4.64 and 5.07 μM, respectively and around 12-fold selectivity between MGC-803 and GES-1, indicating a relatively low toxicity to normal cells. The potency and low toxicity of compound 7i make the thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine an attractive scaffold for designing new derivatives selectively targeting MGC-803 cells.

Scaffold diversity has been highly pursued in the construction of small-molecule libraries, highlighting the importance of molecular scaffolds in the identification of new drugs. Of particular interest are the heterocyclic scaffolds,14 which are prevalent in drugs and natural products. Modifications in the biologically privileged scaffolds have been recognized as an important strategy to search new bioactive compounds for the treatment of diseases. Compounds bearing the bicyclic thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold have been proved to exhibit diverse biological activities such as anti-tumor,59 antimicrobial,10 anti-inflammatory,11 antinociceptive12 and human cytomegalovirus inhibitory.13 For example, compound A as a TRPV1 (vanilloid receptor 1) antagonist is orally active and exerts reversal of carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia models in rats (Fig. 1).14 Compound B is a highly potent and selective hA3AR (human adenosine A3 receptor) antagonist with a hA3AR Ki value reaching 18 nM.15 Moreover, 7-thia-8-oxoguanosine C is a guanosine analogue showing immunostimulatory activity both in vivo and in vitro,16,17 in addition to a broad-spectrum antiviral activity.1820 Also, thiazolidinone D was reported to be active against HEPG2 (human liver carcinoma cell line) targeting thymidylate synthase.21 Therefore, modifications based on this scaffold may be a viable strategy for designing new antiproliferative agents. Our previous work has demonstrated that the thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold could be used for designing apoptosis-inducing agents.22 Following our previous work, herein we report the synthesis and the antiproliferative activity against three human cancer cell lines of a series of thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine derivatives. We also explored the selectivity of such compounds to MGC-803 cells over GES-1 cells.

Fig. 1. Pharmaceutically important thiazolo-pyrimidine derivatives.

Fig. 1

The general synthetic route was illustrated in Scheme 1. The intermediate derivatives 5a–b were synthesized following the previously reported procedure.23 Then the isothiocyanate analogs reacted with 5a–b under alkaline conditions (cesium carbonate) in acetonitrile to give the key active intermediates 6a–f.24 The target compounds 7a–j were readily obtained by refluxing indicated amines with 6 and triethylamine in isopropanol.

Scheme 1. Reagent and conditions: (a) alkyl bromide, TEA, methanol, reflux, 2 h; (b) fuming nitric acid, AcOH, 25–45 °C, 1 h; (c) POCl3, DMA, reflux, 2 h; (d) Fe, AcOH, methanol, rt ∼ reflux; (e) R2SCN, Cs2CO3, acetonitrile, rt, overnight; (f) TEA, isopropanol, reflux, 6 h.

Scheme 1

All the target compounds were screened for their antiproliferative activities against human gastric cancer cell lines (MGC-803 and HGC-27) and a human lung cancer cell line (H1650) by the MTT assay (the cells were purchased from the Cell Bank, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was employed as the reference drug.25 The antiproliferative results are summarized in Table 1. Generally, most of the synthesized compounds presented moderate to good inhibition toward the tested cancer cell lines, and in particular, were more sensitive to the MGC-803 cell line than the other two cell lines with IC50 values of less than 10 μM. For MGC-803 cells, compounds 7a, 7c, and 7i showed the best inhibitory effect with IC50 values of around 5 μM, comparable to 5-FU. For HGC-27 and H1650 cells, this series of compounds displayed a decreased inhibitory activity with IC50 values of more than 10 μM. Only compound 7i showed a slightly better antiproliferative activity than 5-FU. For H1650 cells, a similar trend was observed; compounds 7b and 7e were slightly more potent than 5-FU with IC50 values of 8.49 and 5.79 μM, respectively. In general, this series of compounds did not show remarkable structure–activity relationships, highlighting the importance of the thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold in the activity observed. The prioritized one is the compound 7i, which potently inhibited the growth of MGC-803 and HGC27 cells and will be subjected to further mechanistic studies.

Table 1. Antiproliferative activities of thiazolo-pyrimidine derivatives against three cancer cell lines.

Compound R1 R2 R3N IC50 a (μM)
MGC-803 HGC27 H1650
7a Propyl Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u1.jpg 5.13 ± 0.71 16.17 ± 1.20 13.36 ± 1.12
7b Propyl Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u2.jpg 9.84 ± 0.99 12.26 ± 1.50 8.49 ± 0.92
7c Propyl Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u3.jpg 4.81 ± 0.68 18.90 ± 1.27 21.73 ± 1.65
7d Propyl 3,4,5-triMeO-Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u4.jpg 14.50 ± 0.65 27.56 ± 0.87 36.93 ± 3.06
7e Propyl 2-Cl-Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u5.jpg 6.07 ± 0.78 10.30 ± 1.01 5.79 ± 0.86
7f Propyl 2-Cl-Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u6.jpg 7.78 ± 0.89 10.62 ± 1.02 12.95 ± 2.16
7g Propyl graphic file with name c7md00165g-u7.jpg graphic file with name c7md00165g-u8.jpg 8.63 ± 0.96 10.23 ± 0.79 13.13 ± 2.01
7h Propyl graphic file with name c7md00165g-u9.jpg graphic file with name c7md00165g-u10.jpg 30.80 ± 1.48 13.50 ± 1.13 18.73 ± 2.66
7i Bn- Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u11.jpg 4.64 ± 0.66 5.07 ± 0.70 13.83 ± 1.14
7j Bn- Ph graphic file with name c7md00165g-u12.jpg 9.91 ± 0.99 >64 15.73 ± 0.36
5-FU 6.56 ± 0.31 8.22 ± 0.98 12.52 ± 1.53

aInhibitory activity was assayed by exposure for 72 h to the substrate and expressed as the concentration required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by 50% (IC50). Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.

The potent inhibition of compounds 7a and 7i against MGC-803 cells prompted us to explore the selectivity between MGC-803 cells and GES-1 cells. As shown in Table 2, these two compounds showed good selectivity with SI values of >12.5 and 12.0, respectively, indicating low toxicity (IC50 > 55 μM against GES-1 cells). The potency and low toxicity of compounds 7a and 7i make the thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine an attractive scaffold for designing new derivatives selectively targeting MGC-803 cells.

Table 2. Selectivity of compounds 7a and 7i between MGC-803 and GES-1.

Compound IC50 a (μM)
SI b
MGC-803 GES-1
7a 5.13 ± 0.71 >64 >12.5
7i 4.64 ± 0.66 55.84 ± 0.99 12.0

aInhibitory activity was assayed by exposure for 72 h to the substance and expressed as the concentration required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by 50% (IC50). Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.

bThe selectivity index (SI) was calculated based on the IC50 (GES-1) and IC50 (MGC803) data.

In light of the acceptable cytotoxicity and low toxicity of compounds 7a and 7i, their molecular properties were calculated online using the free molecular calculation services provided by Molsoft (; http://molsoft.com/mprop). As shown in Table 3, compounds 7a and 7i exhibited acceptable molecular properties with a MolLogP value slightly higher than the desirable value.

Table 3. Molecular properties of 7a and 7i a .

Compound MW HBA HBD Mol log P MolPSA (A2) MV (A3)
Desirable value <500 <10 <5 <5 <140
7a 486.19 7 1 5.82 62.61 476.71
7i 448.15 6 1 5.47 43.92 411.88

aMW: molecular weight; HBA: number of hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD: number of hydrogen bond donors; Mol log P: log P value predicted by Molsoft; MolPSA: topological polar surface area; MV: molecular volume.

In conclusion, a series of thiazolo-pyrimidine derivatives were prepared and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity toward several human cancer cell lines. Most of the target compounds showed moderate to good inhibition against the tested cell lines. Among them, compounds 7a and 7i exhibited potent inhibition against MGC-803 cells with IC50 values of 5.13 and 4.64 μM, respectively and showed at least 12-fold selectivity between MGC-803 and GES-1, indicating their low toxicity. These results indicated that the thiazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold may serve as a template for designing new anticancer agents.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research Programs of Proteins (2016YFA0501800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 81430085 and No. 21372206 for H.-M. L.), the Key Research Program of Henan Province (No. 1611003110100 for H.-M. L.), and the Starting Grant of Zhengzhou University (No. 32210533 for B. Yu).

Footnotes

†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7md00165g

References

  1. Wang S., Zhao L. J., Zheng Y. C. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;125:940–951. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi X. J., Yu B., Wang J. W. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31607. doi: 10.1038/srep31607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu B., Qi P. P., Shi X. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;117:241–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu B., Xing H., Yu D. Q. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016;12:1000–1039. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin R., Johnson S. G., Connolly P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19(8):2333–2337. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fahmy H. T., Rostom S. A., Saudi M. N. Arch. Pharm. 2003;336(4–5):216–225. doi: 10.1002/ardp.200300734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu Z. Q., Paul R., Bhattacharya C. Biochemistry. 2015;54(19):3100–3109. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu Z. Q., Schmaltz R. M., Bozeman T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135(8):2883–2886. doi: 10.1021/ja311090e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baljinder S., Santosh K., Geng P. F. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013;70:864–874. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jang M. Y., De Jonghe S., Segers K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19(1):702–714. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bekhit A. A., Fahmy H. T., Rostom S. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003;38(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/s0223-5234(02)00009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Varano F., Catarzi D., Vincenzi F. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59(23):10564–10576. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis A. F., Drach J. C., Fennewald S. M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994;38(12):2889–2895. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.12.2889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lebsack A. D., Branstetter B. J., Hack M. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Varano F., Catarzi D., Squarcialupi L. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;96:105–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Colic M., Jandric D., Gasic S. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000;14(3):209–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharma B. S., Mhaskar S., Balazs L. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 1992;14(1–2):1–19. doi: 10.3109/08923979209009210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smee D. F., Alaghamandan H. A., Cottam H. B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989;33(9):1487–1492. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smee D. F., Alaghamandan H. A., Cottam H. B. J. Biol. Response Modif. 1990;9(1):24–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smee D. F., Alaghamandan H. A., Jin A. Antiviral Res. 1990;13(2):91–102. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(90)90025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Zahar M. I., Adb El-Karim S. S., Haiba M. E. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2011;68(3):357–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Z. H., Zhang J., Liu X. Q. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;135:204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Z. H., Yang D. X., Geng P. F. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;124:967–980. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu J., Patch R. J., Schubert C. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70(24):10194–10197. doi: 10.1021/jo0517702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Duan Y. C., Ma Y. C., Zhang E. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013;62:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from MedChemComm are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES