A series of purine-based homologous C-nucleoside mimics have been synthesized and evaluated for their antiplasmodial activity.
Abstract
A series of homologous C-nucleoside mimics have been synthesized via an efficient and facile synthetic protocol involving the conjugate addition of purine to sugar derived olefinic ester in good yields. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their antiplasmodial activity in vitro against both the CQ-sensitive and resistant strains of P. falciparum. Interestingly, all the synthesized nucleoside analogs exhibited an IC50 of <5 μM, while compounds 22a, 23a, and 23b showed promising antiplasmodial activity with an IC50 of 1.61, 0.88, and 1.01 μM against the CQ-sensitive Pf3D7 strain and 1.14, 1.01, and 2.57 μM against the CQ-resistant PfK1 strain, respectively.
1. Introduction
Malaria, an infectious disease caused by the protozoan parasites Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum), P. ovale, P. vivax and P. malariae, is transmitted from the bite of an Anopheles mosquito. P. falciparum is mainly responsible for the most severe form of human malaria and millions of deaths globally. As per World Health Organization reports, malaria affected about 216 million people in 2016, resulting in 445 000 deaths, mostly in infants.1 Resistance to chloroquine and other conventionally used antimalarial drugs such as pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in P. falciparum is reported in many endemic areas.2,3 With the emergence of resistance to almost all the quinolones and antifolate drugs in P. falciparum malaria,4 artemisinin and its derivatives are the mainstay to treat malaria. Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) act as the frontline treatments against P. falciparum malaria.5 Resistance to artemisinins in several areas (WHO 2015) has led to the development of urgently needed novel drugs that could selectively target P. falciparum.6
Plasmodium parasites are purine auxotrophs as they are unable to perform de novo purine biosynthesis.7 The parasite depends upon the salvage of purine from the host for its survival and proliferation.8 Several unique enzymes for the purine metabolism in parasites hold significant promise as drug targets. Purine-based nucleosides exhibit antiplasmodial activity by inhibiting these crucial enzymes involved in purine biosynthesis of parasites.9–13 Purine-based acyclic nucleosides are potent inhibitors of PfHGXPRT, an enzyme essential for the synthesis of nucleoside monophosphates.14–16 5′-Methylthiocoformycin (1) and its analogs are reported to selectively inhibit P. falciparum adenosine deaminase (PfADA) to the human adenosine deaminase (hADA).17N6-(2,2-diphenylethyl)-5′-N-phenylcarboxamidoadenosine (2) exhibits activity against the CQ-resistant strains (IC50 of 1.8 μM).18 Methylthio-immucillin-H (MT-immucillin-H, 3) is reported to selectively inhibit the purine nucleoside phosphorylase of P. falciparum (PfPNP).19 The purine nucleoside MDL73811 (4) exhibited good antimalarial activity with an IC50 of 2–3 μM against P. falciparum strains by inhibiting S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC) against both CQ-sensitive and CQ-resistant strains.20 Another nucleoside analog (6′R)-6′-C-methylneplanocin A (RMNPA, 5) effectively inhibits S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (AdoHcy) hydrolase resulting in significant antimalarial activity (IC50 of 0.10 μM) (Fig. 1).21,22
Fig. 1. Purine nucleoside-based antimalarial nucleosides and general structures of synthesized nucleoside analogs.
In view of the above, we thought to access few nucleoside analogs which could inhibit the crucial enzymes of Plasmodium parasites and exhibit antimalarial activity against both the CQ-sensitive (Pf3D7) and resistant (PfK1) strains.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The synthesis of compounds was accomplished starting from 1′,2′:5′,6′-di-O-isopropylidene-α-d-glucofuranose 723 easily prepared from d-glucose. The latter was transformed to 3-O-benzyl and 3-O-(2-nitrophenyl)glycofuranosylenoate derivatives 15 and 16 in good yields (>95%) by the earlier reported methods of Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons olefination of the respective aldoses (13 and 14) with triethyl phosphonate (Scheme 1).23
Scheme 1. Synthesis of glycosyl esters (15 and 16) and purine-based C-nucleoside analogues (20a–23a & 20b–23b) and (24–29). Reagents and conditions: (a) NaH (1 equiv.), TBAB (20 mol%), THF, 0–25 °C, 12 h, 90–95%; (b) 70% AcOH aq., 25 °C, 8 h, 98%; (c) NaIO4 aq. (1 equiv.), MeOH, 0–25 °C, 3 h, 90–92%; (d) TEPA (1 equiv.), LiOH (1 equiv.), THF, 25 °C, 8 h, 92–94%; (e) DBU (10 mol%), MeOH or EtOH, reflux, 16–18 h; (f) LiAlH4 (1 equiv.), anh. THF, N2 atm., 0–25 °C, 3 h, 88–94%.
The glycofuranosylenoate (15 and 16) on DBU catalyzed conjugate addition of purine derivatives (17–19) in ethanol gave the diastereoisomeric mixture of the respective glycoconjugates of purines (20a–23a & 20b–23b). The addition of purines to the olefinic ester was regioselective, and in each reaction, a diastereomeric mixture of two compounds was formed with only the N-9 attachment of purine ring, and two diastereomers have the S (β-l-ido) and R (α-d-gluco) configuration at the C-5′ in the sugar units (Scheme 1). The formation of diastereomers was evident from TLC and NMR spectral data. The diastereomers were isolated using column chromatography, and the structures were confirmed by various 1D (1H, 13C) and 2D (COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC) NMR experiments and ESI-MS analysis. 2D-NMR spectroscopy revealed the structures of 20a and 20b and configuration at the C-5′ of the sugar units. HMBC correlation of CH2-7′′ to C-3′ revealed the connectivity of the benzyl moiety to the sugar ring. H-5′ showed HMBC correlations with C-4 and C-8. H-8 showed HMBC correlation with C-5′. These essential HMBC correlations confirmed the N-9 connectivity of the adenine moiety to the sugar unit. HMBC correlations of 20a and 20b were similar and suggested that the adenine moiety was attached to the sugar moiety through N-9 in both the compounds. Few nOe correlations of the above compounds were found to be different. In compound 20b, nOe correlations of H-5′ to H-3′ established that the adenine moiety is above the plane, i.e. the α-d-gluco (R) configuration at C-5′ in the sugar units, whereas these nOe correlations are absent in compound 20a and indicated that the adenine moiety in compound 20a is below the plane at C-5′ having the β-l-ido (S) configuration (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Important NOESY and HMBC correlation of 20a and 20b.
The reduction of the above ethanoates/methanoates 20a–23a & 20b–23b with LiAlH4 led to the formation of the respective alcohol analogs (20–29) in excellent yields (Scheme 1).
For SAR activity, we have also synthesized the 3-O-(2-aminophenyl)enoate derivative (30) by Pd/C reduction of the nitro group in the nitrophenyl ring of 21a. The ester group in compound 30 was hydrolyzed to the respective acid derivative (31) with Et3N in THF in good yield (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of amino ester (30) and amino acid (31)-based C-nucleoside analogues. Reagent conditions: (a) Pd–C (10 mol%), H2 atm., 2 h, 98%; (b) Et3N (3 equiv.), 50% EtOH aq., 36 h, 88%.
In order to explore the role of the sugar unit and to check the activity of arylated purines, the N-9-arylated adenine derivative (33)24 was also synthesized by the reaction of adenine (17) with 4-fluoroacetophenone (32) via SNAr reaction in DMSO in the presence of K2CO3 at 140 °C. The reduction of the ketone to the respective alcohol (34) was carried out using NaBH4. The carboxyethyloxy propyl derivative (36) was synthesized by the Michael addition of adenine (17) to the ethyl acrylate (35) in refluxing ethanol in the presence of NaOEt (Scheme 3).25
Scheme 3. Synthesis of N-9-phenyl and alkyl-purine derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (a) K2CO3 (2.5 equiv.), DMSO, 140 °C, 36 h, 62%; (b) NaBH4 (1 equiv.), MeOH, 25 °C, 2 h, 99%; (c) EtONa (1 equiv.), EtOH, reflux, 3 h, 98%.
2.2. Biology
In vitro antiplasmodial activity
All of the above-synthesized compounds (20a–23a, 20b–23b, 24–29, and 30–36) were evaluated for their in vitro antiplasmodial activity against the CQ-sensitive (3D7) and CQ-resistant (K1) strains of P. falciparum with chloroquine as the reference drug (Table 1).
Table 1. In vitro antiplasmodial activity f and cytotoxicity of final compounds.
| Comp. | Structure | IC50
a
,
b
(μM) |
RI c (μM) | CC50 d (μM) | SI
e
(μM) |
||
| Pf3D7 | PfK1 | Pf3D7 | PfK1 | ||||
| 20a |
|
4.44 ± 0.31 | 4.79 ± 0.25 | 1.07 | 68.43 | 15.41 | 14.28 |
| 20b |
|
4.12 ± 0.22 | 4.09 ± 0.03 | 0.99 | 86.31 | 20.94 | 21.10 |
| 21a |
|
3.56 ± 0.43 | 4.93 ± 0.15 | 1.38 | 96.31 | 27.05 | 19.53 |
| 21b |
|
4.24 ± 0.06 | 4.25 ± 0.005 | 1.00 | 118.99 | 28.06 | 27.99 |
| 22a |
|
1.61 ± 0.09 | 1.14 ± 0.14 | 0.70 | 57.49 | 35.70 | 50.42 |
| 22b |
|
3.60 ± 0.01 | 2.27 ± 0.17 | 0.63 | 53.27 | 14.79 | 23.46 |
| 23a |
|
0.88 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 1.28 | 81.46 | 92.56 | 72.08 |
| 23b |
|
1.01 ± 0.25 | 2.57 ± 0.86 | 2.54 | 44.95 | 44.50 | 17.49 |
| 24 |
|
4.31 ± 0.12 | 4.99 ± 0.2 | 1.15 | 97.14 | 22.53 | 19.46 |
| 25 |
|
3.62 ± 0.37 | 4.70 ± 0.19 | 1.11 | 148.07 | 37.11 | 33.34 |
| 26 |
|
3.99 ± 0.03 | 4.44 ± 0.21 | 0.75 | 61.24 | 19.56 | 25.83 |
| 27 |
|
4.52 ± 0.16 | 4.09 ± 0.05 | 1.29 | 148.07 | 40.90 | 31.50 |
| 28 |
|
3.13 ± 0.10 | 2.37 ± 0.46 | 0.90 | 51.80 | 11.46 | 12.66 |
| 29 |
|
4.11 ± 0.04 | 4.99 ± 0.35 | 1.21 | 74.87 | 18.21 | 15.00 |
| 30 |
|
4.47 ± 0.09 | >5 | >1.11 | 89.68 | 20.06 | 17.93 |
| 31 |
|
4.82 ± 0.75 | 3.72 | 67.07 | 13.91 | 18.02 | |
| 33 |
|
>5 | ND | ND | NA | NA | |
| 34 |
|
>5 | ND | ND | NA | NA | |
| 36 |
|
>5 | ND | ND | NA | NA | |
| Chloroquine | 0.0049 ± 0.0001 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 169.3 | ||||
a50% inhibitory concentration against the chloroquine-sensitive (3D7) and resistant (K1) strains of P. falciparum.
bValues are represented as the average of at least duplicate determinations.
cResistance index (RI) = IC50 K1/IC50 3D7.
d50% cytotoxic concentrations; the monkey kidney cell line (VERO) was obtained from the tissue culture lab, CDRI.
eSelectivity index (SI) = CC50/IC50. ND = not done. NA = not applicable.
fWe used human RBCs that were obtained from a blood bank under the approval CDRI/IEC/2017/A4 (the CDRI Human Ethics Committee clearance number for the P. falciparum culture in human RBCs).
The nucleoside analogs having the 3-O-benzyl (20a and 20b) or 3-O-(2-nitrophenyl) (21a and 21b) substituents have shown activity (IC50 = <5 μM) against both the strains. 6-Amino N-alkylated purine nucleoside analogs 22a (IC50 of 1.61 μM and 1.14 μM) and 23a (IC50 of 0.88 μM and 1.13 μM) displayed antiplasmodial activity only at the lower concentration with the IC50 < 2 μM against both the CQ-sensitive and resistant strains. Compounds 22a (IC50 of 1.61 μM & 1.14 μM) and 23a (IC50 of 0.88 μM & 1.13 μM) with the β-l-ido (S) configuration showed better in vitro antiplasmodial activity as compared to compounds 22b (IC50 of 3.60 μM & 2.27 μM) and 23b (IC50 of 1.01 μM & 2.57 μM) with α-d-gluco (R) configuration against the CQ-sensitive and resistant strains, respectively. Comparing the antiplasmodial activity of nucleoside analogs (20a–23a & 20b–23b) with that of the ester and alcohol (24–29) groups, esters showed better activity as compared to alcohol analogs. However, between the nucleoside analogs with carboxyl and ester groups, the former (31) has IC50 values of 4.82 and 3.72 μM while the latter (30) displayed antiplasmodial activity with IC50 values of 4.47 and >5 μM against the CQ-sensitive and resistant strains, respectively. The adenine derivatives 33 and 34 with the aryl group rather than the sugar unit as the N-9 substituent did not display any significant activity (IC50 > 5 μM) indicating the importance of sugar units in antiplasmodial response. Adenine derivative 36 with an N-9 propanoate substituent also did not display any significant activity against either of the strains in vitro (IC50 > 5 μM). All the sixteen nucleoside analogs having an IC50 of <5 μM against either of the strains were further evaluated for their cytotoxicity against VERO cell line and their CC50 and selectivity index (SI) against both Pf strains are reported in Table 1. The results showed that all these compounds have no discernible cytotoxicity. The most active antiplasmodial compounds (22a and 23a) exhibited a higher CC50 of 57.49 & 81.46 μM, respectively, and selectivity index (SI = 35.70 & 50.42 for 22a and 92.56 & 72.08 for 23a) as compared to compounds 22b and 23b with a CC50 of 53.27 & 44.95 μM, respectively, and selectivity index (SI = 14.79 & 23.46 for 22b and 44.50 & 17.49 for 23b) for both the CQ-sensitive and resistant strains. Resistance index (RI) is a parameter, which describes the activity of a compound regardless of the susceptibility of parasite strain and any potent drug should have a low RI value. Delightfully, the majority of the synthesized nucleoside analogs have RI values <1.5, whereas the RI of the reference drug chloroquine was found to be 169.3 (Table 1).
3. Conclusion
In summary, purine-based derivatives, C-nucleoside analogs were synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-sensitive and resistant strains of P. falciparum. All of the nucleoside analogs exhibited an IC50 of <5 μM; however, the non-glycosylated purines did not show any significant activity against either of the CQ-sensitive or resistant strains. Among these, three nucleoside analogs exhibited an IC50 of <2 μM against either of the strains. From the initial SAR study, it has been found that the compounds with a β-l-ido (S) configuration (22a & 23a) showed better activity than compounds with an α-d-gluco (R) configuration (22b & 23b), and 6-amino alkylated purine nucleoside ester analogues (22a, 23a, and 23b) exhibited good antiplasmodial activity having an IC50 of 0.88–2.57 μM.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
K. S. and R. M. are thankful to UGC and PJ to DBT New Delhi for fellowships. Financial assistance from the Indo-French project (CEFIPRA-5303-2) is also greatly acknowledged. We sincerely thank SAIF division, CSIR-CDRI for the use of analytical facilities. This manuscript is CDRI communication no. 9703.
Footnotes
†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Additional information includes spectral copies, HPLC chromatogram of compounds, and 2D NMR spectral copies. See DOI: 10.1039/c8md00098k
References
- World Malaria Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- Nosten F., Price R. N. Drug Saf. 1995;12:264–273. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199512040-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez T., Myatt A. V., Coatney G. R., Jeffery G. M. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1953;2:797–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen I., Eastman R., Lanzer M. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:1551–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vangapandu S., Jain M., Kaur K., Patil P., Patel S. R., Jain R. Med. Res. Rev. 2007;27:65–107. doi: 10.1002/med.20062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (a) White N. J. Lancet. 2010;376:2051–2052. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61963-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Packard R. M. N. Eng. J. Med. 2014;371:397–399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1403340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawton P. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2005;15:987–994. [Google Scholar]
- Cassera M. B., Zhang Y., Hazleton K. Z., Schramm V. L. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011;11:2103–2115. doi: 10.2174/156802611796575948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harmse L., van Zyl R., Gray N., Schultz P., Leclerc S., Meijer L., Doerig C., Havlik I. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001;62:341–348. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00644-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gigante A., Priego E. M., Sanchez-Carrasco P., Ruiz-Perez L. M., Vande Voorde J., Camarasa M. J., Balzarini J., Gonzalez-Pacanowska D., Perez-Perez M. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;82:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.05.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Z., Tran H. A., Manivannan S., Wen X., Kaiser M., Brun R., Snyder F. F., Back T. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:2861–2865. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golisade A., Wiesner J., Herforth C., Jomaa H., Link A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002;10:769–777. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(01)00331-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Too K., Brown D. M., Loakes D., Bongard E., Vivas L. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2007;26:579–583. doi: 10.1080/15257770701490134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keough D. T., Skinner-Adams T., Jones M. K., Ng A. L., Brereton I. M., Guddat L. W., de Jersey J. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:7479–7486. doi: 10.1021/jm061012j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keough D. T., Spacek P., Hockova D., Tichy T., Vrbkova S., Slavetinska L., Janeba Z., Naesens L., Edstein M. D., Chavchich M., Wang T. H., de Jersey J., Guddat L. W. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:2513–2526. doi: 10.1021/jm301893b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazleton K. Z., Ho M. C., Cassera M. B., Clinch K., Crump D. R., Rosario Jr. I., Merino E. F., Almo S. C., Tyler P. C., Schramm V. L. Chem. Biol. 2012;19:721–730. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyler P. C., Taylor E. A., Fröhlich R. F. G., Schramm V. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6872–6879. doi: 10.1021/ja0708363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodenko B., Detz R. J., Pinas V. A., Lambertucci C., Brun R., Wanner M. J., Koomen G. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:1618–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans G. B., Furneaux R. H., Lewandowicz A., Schramm V. L., Tyler P. C. J. Med. Chem. 2003;46:3412–3423. doi: 10.1021/jm030145r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright P. S., Byers T. L., Cross-Doersen D. E., McCann P. P., Bitonti A. J. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991;41:1713–1718. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90174-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shuto S., Minakawa N., Niizuma S., Kim H. S., Wataya Y., Matsuda A. J. Med. Chem. 2002;45:748–751. doi: 10.1021/jm010374i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takagi C., Sukeda M., Kim H.-S., Wataya Y., Yabe S., Kitade Y., Matsuda A., Shuto S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005;3:1245–1251. doi: 10.1039/b418829b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari V. K., Tewari N., Katiyar D., Tripathi R. P., Arora K., Gupta S., Ahmad R., Srivastava A. K., Khan M. A., Murthy P. K., Walter R. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003;11:1789–1800. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(03)00033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen A. F., Ulven T. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:4997–4999. doi: 10.1039/c3cc48642g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J. C., Jung J., Rho Y., Kim M., Kwon W., Kim H., Kim I. J., Kim J. R., Ree M. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:2822–2833. doi: 10.1021/bm200572t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





