Skip to main content
MedChemComm logoLink to MedChemComm
. 2016 Nov 25;8(4):725–729. doi: 10.1039/c6md00539j

Identification of potent tricyclic prodrug S1P1 receptor modulators

David Marcoux a,, Hai-Yun Xiao a, T G Murali Dhar a, Jenny Xie a, Lois D Lehman-McKeeman a, Dauh-Rurng Wu a, Marta Dabros a, Xiaoxia Yang a, Tracy L Taylor a, Xia D Zhou a, Elizabeth M Heimrich a, Rochelle Thomas a, Kim W McIntyre a, Hong Shi a, Paul C Levesque a, Huadong Sun a, Zheng Yang a, Anthony M Marino a, Georgia Cornelius a, Celia J D'Arienzo a, Anuradha Gupta b, Bala Pragalathan b, Richard Rampulla a, Arvind Mathur a, Ding Ren Shen a, Mary Ellen Cvijic a, Luisa Salter-Cid a, Louis J Lombardo a, Percy H Carter a, Alaric J Dyckman a
PMCID: PMC6071880  PMID: 30108791

graphic file with name c6md00539j-ga.jpgHerein, S1P1 partial agonists with shorter half-life than our previous clinical candidate are reported. The pulmonary and cardiac safety are assessed, issues currently observed with commercial Gilenya.

Abstract

Recently, our research group reported the identification of prodrug amino-alcohol 2 as a potent and efficacious S1P1 receptor modulator. This molecule is differentiated preclinically over the marketed drug fingolimod (Gilenya 1), whose active phosphate metabolite is an S1P1 full agonist, in terms of pulmonary and cardiovascular safety. S1P1 partial agonist 2, however, has a long half-life in rodents and was projected to have a long half-life in humans. The purpose of this communication is to disclose highly potent partial agonists of S1P1 with shorter half-lives relative to the clinical compound 2. PK/PD relationships as well as their preclinical pulmonary and cardiovascular safety assessment are discussed.

Introduction

Autoimmune disorders are characterized by an abnormal immune response targeting different tissues. Immune cell trafficking from circulation to the affected tissue is a critical process tied to the progression of autoimmune disease.1 The family of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1P1–5) have been shown to be regulators of a variety of processes, including angiogenesis, differentiation, cell migration and cell trafficking.2 In particular, it has been demonstrated that S1P1 is essential for lymphocyte recirculation and regulation of lymphocyte egress from secondary lymphoid organs.3

Although activation of S1P1 receptor by S1P initially increases cell trafficking, overstimulation promotes receptor desensitization, endocytosis and recycling.4 Fingolimod-P (1-P) (Fig. 1) was shown to induce internalization and degradation with no or slow recycling.5 The net effect of this action is functional antagonism of S1P1 leading to robust lymphopenia.6 In 2010, fingolimod (1), was approved by the FDA for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It has been clinically associated with decreased pulmonary function, elevation of blood pressure as well as transient bradycardia.7 These effects may be associated with the non-selective nature of the active phosphate metabolite 1-P of fingolimod (which binds to and activates S1P1,3,4,5), or that 1-P is a full agonist at S1P1 (eliciting an agonist response comparable to S1P in magnitude). In addition, the associated long human T1/2 (100–200 h) is of concern due to its robust immunosuppressive nature and the potential susceptibility for infection.

Fig. 1. Structures of fingolimod (Gilenya, 1) and partial agonist 2 and their corresponding active metabolite.

Fig. 1

We recently reported the identification of S1P3 sparing, S1P1 partial agonist prodrug 2/2-P (BMS-986104) with an improved preclinical pulmonary and cardiovascular safety profile compared to 1/1-P (Fig. 1).8 These safety improvements have been hypothesized to be attributed not only to its selectivity for S1P1 over S1P3ref. 9 but also to ligand-biased signaling of 2-P at S1P1 (including the observed partial agonism in GTPγS and internalization assays).10 However, the in vivo half-life (T1/2) of amino alcohol 2 was found to be long in rat (162 h) and was predicted to be long in human as well. Concurrent to this work, we have identified tricyclic azetidine carboxylic acids 3 as potent full and direct acting agonists of S1P1 with shorter in vivo T1/2 (<20 h) (Fig. 2).11 This report details our efforts to combine the desired in vivo T1/2 profile of the direct agonist framework 3 with the potent, S1P3 sparing, S1P1 partial agonist prodrug chemotype 2.

Fig. 2. Merging the direct acting and pro-drug programs.

Fig. 2

Results and discussion

Scheme 1 summarizes the general synthesis of these tricyclic S1P1 modulators which commences from 2-tetralone 5.12 Condensation with thiourea under oxidative conditions allowed the formation of aminothiazole 6 in 79% yield.13 Sandmeyer reaction then gave rise to chloro intermediate 7 or iodo intermediate 8 in 35% and 55% yield, respectively. Intermediate 7 underwent Fe-catalyzed coupling with alkyl Grignards14 giving access to amino alcohols 10–14 after hydrolysis. Alternatively, iodo intermediate 8 can be treated with alcohols or thiols providing thiazole 15–20. Buchwald–Hartwig or Suzuki cross coupling also allowed access to analogues 22–24.

Scheme 1. (a) Thiourea, I2, EtOH, reflux, 79% (b) t-BuONO, CuX, MeCN, 0 °C, X = Cl; 35%, I; 55% (c) Fe(acac)3, NMP, THF, RMgCl, 23 °C 65–88% or R = ROH or RSH, tBuOK, dioxane, reflux, 45–75% or RB(OH)2, Pddppf, Na2CO3, dioxane, reflux, 75–89% or RRNH, Pd2dba3, Xphos, PhMe, 23 °C 44% (d) LiOH, dioxane, reflux, 65–89%.

Scheme 1

All compounds were then evaluated in rats (2 mg kg–1, po) to assess the effects on circulating lymphocytes and generate an estimated T1/2 from oral dosing over a period of 72 h.15 The circulating levels of parent and corresponding active phosphate at three time points are presented in Table 1. Aliphatic sidechains of varying length (C3–C7) were prepared as the initial comparators to bicyclic analogue 2 (see compounds 10–14, Table 1). Relative to 2, this series demonstrated a shorter in vivo T1/2 (e.g.12vs.2; molecules of same side chain length, see Fig. 2 for numbering). In general, longer aliphatic chains led to longer oral T1/2.16 Consistent with this observation, longer aliphatic side chains had a more robust effect on lymphocyte reduction at 48 h. Increased carbon length also resulted in full agonism at S1P1 of the phosphate metabolites in vitro, an undesirable feature (see 14-P, Table 2).17 Thiazole 12 provided a balance between efficacy at 24 h, S1P1 partial agonism, and favorable oral T1/2. In order to reduce the in vivo T1/2 further, heteroatoms were introduced on the side chain of 12 (see, 15, 19, and 21, Table 1). In all cases, the estimated T1/2 was reduced compared to 12. Oxythiazole 15 and 16 showed desirable properties although 16 has similar T1/2 as amino alcohol 12. While analogue 15 had a short T1/2 (5 h), it had a rapid onset of lymphopenia with robust lymphocyte reduction at 4 h. Long chain oxythiazoles such as 17 and 18 showed sustained lymphopenia beyond 48 h and their corresponding phosphates exhibited undesired full agonistic properties (see 17-P and 18-P, Table 2). On the other hand, sulfur incorporation (19–20, Table 1) further reduced T1/2. The lymphocyte reduction observed with 19 is noteworthy since robust (4 h) to moderate (24 h) affects were seen with very low levels of parent or phosphate in circulation. The presence of unidentified active metabolites, one possible explanation for the sustained pharmaco dynamic (PD; lymphopenia) effects, was not investigated for these compounds. Alternatively, the lipophilic pocket of S1P1 did not seem to accommodate amines 21 and 22 both in vivo and in vitro (Tables 1 and 2). Exploration beyond alkyl groups to aromatic (23–24, Table 1) side chains was not promising.

Table 1. Rat PK/PD relationship of various tricyclic S1P1 modulators.

Inline graphic
4 h
24 h
48 h
Parent in vivo T1/2 a (h)
Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM) Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM) Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM)
10 41% 110 79 0% <19 <10 <2
11 66% 77 97 48% 9.4 8.2 12% <5 <5 <4
12 33% 100 91 83% 55 56 56% 25 16 20
13 59% 110 140 82% 66 160 74% <10 50 35
14 40% 66 63 77% 110 300 80% 43 150 >50
15 74% 35 34 68% 7 20 26% <5 4.0 5
16 67% 81 71 80% 29 26 59% 12 <5 21
17 66% 72 62 82% 31 <5 82% 17 <5 25
18 79% 200 120 87% 140 58 82% 27 18 20
19 82% 9.1 15 48% 1.4 2.3 16% <1 <1 <5
20 72% 87 43 76% 16 10 44% <5 <5 5
21 37% 33 570 0% 0 190
22 30% 110 ND 27% 18 ND 4.4% 4.1 ND 9
23 9.3% 48 12 2.1% 37 19 6
24 31% 97 39 63% 68 <5 30% <5 <5 4

aEstimated T1/2 from oral dosing. All results are a mean of 2 rats. BL; blood lymphocytes, lymp. red.; lymphocyte reduction, phosphate lymphocyte reduction relative to vehicle.

Table 2. In vitro potency of selected active metabolites.

Inline graphic
S1P1 GTPγS (EC50, nM) S1P1 GTPγS (Ymax) S1P1 GTPγS F or P S1P3 GTPγS (EC50, nM)
10 -P 19 79% P >3000
12 -P 21 79% P >3000
14 -P 10 98% F >3000
15 -P 30 58% P >3000
17 -P 12 100% F >3000
18 -P 1.0 110% F 190
19 -P 20 58% P >3000
21 -P 130 49% P >3000

Fully aromatic tricyclic S1P1 modulators were also prepared (Table 3). In general, the in vivo T1/2 are slightly longer than the corresponding unsaturated system allowing for pronounced and sustained (≥24 h) lymphopenia. For example, tricyclic compounds 25 and 28 showed longer T1/2 than their unsaturated equivalent 15 and 19.

Table 3. Rat PK/PD relationship of various aromatic tricyclic S1P1 modulators.

Inline graphic
4 h
24 h
48 h
Parent in vivo T1/2 a (h)
Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM) Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM) Lymp. red. Parent (nM) Phos. (nM)
25 65% 28 5.1 77% 21 <5 59% 12 <5 14
26 80% 31 ND 80% 17 ND 68% 8.3 ND 35
27 73% 81 260 83% 78 250 86% 41 160 41
28 69% 15 10 75% 8.0 8.1 59% <5 <5 6

aEstimated T1/2 from oral dosing. All result are a mean of 2 rats. BL; blood lymphocytes, lymp. red.; lymphocyte reduction, phos.; phosphate lymphocyte reduction relative vehicle.

Based upon the combined profile of short estimated T1/2, partial agonism at S1P1, and differentiated lymphopenia induction potential, thiazoles 12, 15, and 19 were advanced into rat pulmonary safety studies (Fig. 3). In these studies, the level of protein in the lungs following a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was recorded as a marker of compound-induced vascular leakage and pulmonary edema.18 Relative to its estimated in vivo ED50 (estimated effective dose to give 50% lymphopenia at 24 h), thiazole 12 did not increase BAL protein levels up to 10× ED50. Minimal BAL increases were noted at 30× ED50 with more pronounced effects observed at 60× ED50. On the other hand, comparable level of protein was observed with only 1× ED50 for oxythiazole 15 while amino alcohol 19 showed marked increase of protein level at 5× and 15× ED50. In order to place these results in perspective, amino alcohol 18, whose phosphate is an S1P1 full agonist with S1P3 activity (Table 2), showed a robust ∼5× increase in BAL protein level at 20× ED50.

Fig. 3. Protein level in rat lungs following BAL. Average of 3 rats. SD represented with bars.

Fig. 3

Concurrent with lung safety studies, the corresponding phosphates (12P, 15P, and 19P) were evaluated in cultured human cardiomyocytes derived from inducible pluripotent stem cells at 1 nM and 10 nM; an in vitro cardiac safety assay that predicted the effect of fingolimod on human heart rate at clinically relevant concentrations.19Fig. 4 reports the beating rate reduction after 20 minutes of drug treatment, when steady state was reached. Considering that all three phosphates are nearly equipotent partial agonists of S1P1, we considered the maximally desirable beating rate change at these concentrations to be –15% and –30%, respectively. Oxythiazole 15-P reduced spontaneous beat rate to a lesser extent at those concentration (–16% @ 1 nM and –36% at 10 nM). Thiazoles 12-P and 19-P elicited a more robust beating rate reduction but still improved over fingolimod (1-P) (–38% @ 1 nM and –62% @ 10 nM).8

Fig. 4. Cardiomyocyte beating rate reduction 20 minutes after drug treatment. Average of 3–6 experiments. SE represented with bars.

Fig. 4

Conclusions

In conclusion, the successful hybridization of two distinct scaffolds led to the identification of S1P1 modulators which exhibited appreciable lymphocyte reduction in vivo. In vivo T1/2 was reduced to provide more attractive profiles with respect to the potential for long term infection risk reduction. Structure activity studies revealed that shorter chains provided weak and short-lived lymphocyte reductions whereas longer chains provided robust and sustained lymphocyte effects, albeit now with associated S1P1 full agonism. Three analogues, 12, 15 and 19 were evaluated in additional safety studies in vivo and in vitro. Thiazole 12 showed superior pulmonary safety over thiazoles 15 and 19. Although the corresponding phosphate of 12 (12-P) led to a decrease in beating rate in an in vitro cardiomyocyte assay, this reduction was improved over the one observed with fingolimod (1-P). Overall, the preclinical safety profile of thiazole 12/12-P compare favorably to the marketed fingolimod (1).

Supplementary Material

Footnotes

†The authors declare no competing interests.

‡Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Biology and chemistry protocols. See DOI: 10.1039/c6md00539j

References

  1. Cyster J. G., Schwab S. R. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:69–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. For a review, see; Rosen H., Goetzl E. J., Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2005, 5 , 560 –570 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dyckman A. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 2012;47:195–207. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mandala S., Hajdu R., Bergstorm J., Quackenbush E., Xie J., Milligan J., Thornton R., Shei G.-J., Card D., Keohane C. A., Rosenbach M., Hale J., Lynch C. L., Rupprecht K., Parsons W., Rosen H. Science. 2002;296:346–349. doi: 10.1126/science.1070238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chun J., Hartung H. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2010;33:91–101. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181cbf825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brinkmann V., Davis M. D., Heise C. E., Albert R., Cottens S., Hof R., Bruns C., Prieschl E., Baumruker T., Hiestand P., Foster C. A., Zollinger M., Lynch K. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:21453–21457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200176200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kappos L., Antel J., Comi G., Montalban X., O'Connor P., Polman C. H., Haas T., Korn A. A., Karlsson G., Radue E. W. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;355:1124–1140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dhar T. G. M., Xiao H.-Y., Xie J., Lehman-McKeeman L. D., Wu D.-R., Dabros M., Yang X., Taylor T. L., Zhou X. D., Heimrich E. M., Thomas R., McIntyre K. W., Warrack B., Shi H., Levesque P. C., Zhu J. L., Hennan J., Balimane P., Yang Z., Marino A. M., Cornelius G., D'Arienzo C. J., Mathur A., Shen D. R., Cvijic M. E., Salter-Cid L., Barrish J. C., Carter P. H., Dyckman A. J. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:283–288. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. (a) Forrest M., Sun S.-Y., Bergstorm J., Card D., Doherty G., Hale J., Keohane C., Meyers C., Milligan J., Mills S., Nomura N., Rosen H., Rosenbach M., Shei G.-J., Singer I. I., Tian M., White V., Xie J., Proia R. L., Mandala S. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004;309:758–768. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.062828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Z., Chen Z., Hale J. J., Lynch C. L., Mills S. G., Hajdu T., Keohane C. A., Rosenbach M. J., Milligan J. A., Shei G. J., Chrebet G., Parent S. A., Bergstrom J., Card D., Forrest M., Quackenbush E. J., Wickham L. A., Vargas H., Evans R. M., Rosen H., Mandala S. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:6169–6173. doi: 10.1021/jm0503244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gergely P., Nuesslein-Hildesheim B., Guerini D., Brinkmann V., Traebert M., Bruns C., Pan S., Gray N. S., Hinterding K., Cooke N. G., Groenewegen A., Vitaliti A., Sing T., Luttringer O., Yang J., Gardin A., Wang N., Crumb W. J., Saltzman M., Rosenberg M., Wallstrom E. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;167:1035–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02061.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lehman-McKeeman L., Dyckman A. J., Taylor T. L., Yang X., Shen D.-R., Thomas R. L., Borowski V., Tang H., Heimrich E. M., Xiao H.-Y., Gilmore J. L., Sheppeck J., Dhar T. G. M., Cornelius G., Marino A. M., Lecureux L., D'Arienzo C., Sun H., Yang Z., Kukral D., Banas D. M., Suchard S. J., Cvijic M. E., McIntyre K. W., Salter-Cid L. and Xie J., Manuscript in preparation.
  11. T. G. M. Dhar , H.-Y.Xiao, S. H.Watterson, S. S.Ko, A. J.Dyckman, C. M.Langevine, J.Das and R. J.Cherney, PCT Int. Appl., WO 2011059784, 2011 For SAR discussion of related compounds, see: Xiao H.-Y., Watterson S. H., Langevine C. M., Srivastava A. S., Ko S. S., Zhang Y., Cherney R. J., Guo W.-W., Gilmore J. L., Sheppeck J. E., Wu D.-R., Li P., Ramasamy D., Arunachalam P., Mathur A., Taylor T. L., Shuster D. J., McIntyre K. W., Shen D.-R., Yarde M., Cvijic M. E., Marino A. M., Balimane P. V., Yang Z., Banas D. M., Cornelius G., Darienzo C. J., Lehman-McKeeman L., Salter-Cid L. M., Xie J., Barrish J. C., Carter P. H., Dyckman A. J., Dhar T. G. M., J. Med. Chem., 2016, 59 , 9837 –9854 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiao H.-Y., Dyckman A. J., Xiao Z., Yang M. G., Dhar T. G. M., Gilmore J. L. and Marcoux D., PCT Int. Appl., WO 2016028959A1, 2016, 20160225.
  13. For selected references, see;; (a) Bhat S., Shim J. S., Liu J.-O. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23:2733–2737. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chordia M. D., Murphree L. J., Macdonald T. L., Linden J., Olsson R. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:1563–1566. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00236-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. For seminal papers, see;; (a) Furstner A., Leitner A., Mendez M., Krause H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:13856–13863. doi: 10.1021/ja027190t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seidel G., Laurich D., Furstner A. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:3950–3952. doi: 10.1021/jo049885d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 2011)
  16. Although the reason behind the longer estimated apparent in vivo T1/2 observed with longer chains has not been studied in details, it is possible that the additional lipophilicity rendered by the long sider aliphatic chain could affect compound turnover, volume of distribution, phosphorylation and protein binding, leading to the longer estimated apparent T1/2
  17. The agonistic nature (full vs. partial) of the compounds have been assigned based on their efficacy (Ymax) in a GTPγS binding assay
  18. (a) Shea B. S., Brooks S. F., Fontaine B. A., Chun J., Luster A. D., Tager A. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010;43:662–673. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0345OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sammani S., Moreno-Vinassco L., Mirzapoiazova T., Singleton P. A., Chiang E. T., Evenoski C. L., Wang T., Mathew B., Husain A., Moitra J., Sun X., Nunez L., Jacobson J. R., Dudek S. M., Natarajan V., Garcia J. G. N. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010;43:394–402. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0223OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Khan J. M., Lyon A. R., Harding S. E. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013;169:304–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02118.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from MedChemComm are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES