Skip to main content
MedChemComm logoLink to MedChemComm
. 2017 Oct 23;8(12):2173–2180. doi: 10.1039/c7md00353f

Thiosemicarbazone-based selective proliferation inactivators inhibit gastric cancer cell growth, invasion, and migration

Biao Hu a,, Bo Wang a,, Bing Zhao a,, Qian Guo a, Zhong-Hua Li a, Xin-Hui Zhang a, Guang-Yao Liu a, Ying Liu a, Ying Tang a, Fan Luo a, Ya Du a, Ya-Xin Chen a, Li-Ying Ma a,, Hong-Min Liu a,
PMCID: PMC6072408  PMID: 30108734

graphic file with name c7md00353f-ga.jpgA series of novel thiosemicarbazone derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity against several tumor cell lines by MTT assay.

Abstract

A series of novel thiosemicarbazone derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity against several selected tumor cell lines of different origins using the MTT assay. The preliminary results indicated that the MGC-803 cell line was remarkably sensitive to all the synthesized compounds. Among this series, compound 5n showed the best inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 0.93 μM (about 10-fold more potent than 3-AP) against MGC-803. Further mechanism studies revealed that compound 5n could obviously inhibit the proliferation of MGC-803 cells by inducing apoptosis and arresting the cell cycle at the S phase. Compound 5n also showed marked inhibition of cell migration and invasion, without significant cytotoxicity against gastric epithelial immortalized GES-1 cells.

Introduction

Cancer, being one of the leading causes of death globally, poses a major socioeconomic hazard to humanity at large. Although there has been progress in the development of prevention and treatment of cancer, successful treatment of cancer remains a challenge. There is still an urgent need to search for some newer and safer anticancer agents that have a broader spectrum of cytotoxicity to cancer cells.

As reported, neoplastic cells have high requirements for metal due to their generally higher rates of proliferation than normal cells. Considering the crucial roles of these metals, development of novel metal chelators has become a promising anticancer strategy.1 Many in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials have demonstrated that metal (Fe, Cu, and Zn) chelators are effective antiproliferative agents.2

Multi-functionalized thiosemicarbazones and their metal complexes have been a focus of chemists and biologists because of their wide range of therapeutic uses with antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, anticonvulsant, and, most intriguingly, anticancer activity.314 Encouraged by the modest results obtained with traditional metal chelators, a variety of novel thiosemicarbazone-based ligands with antiproliferative activity have been identified (Fig. 1), including 3-AP,15 Dp44mT,16,17 Ap44mT,1821 and DpC.2224 In fact, 3-AP has been investigated in over 20 phase I and phase II clinical trials in a variety of advanced cancers.2527 Unfortunately, 3-AP has suffered multiple problems, including low efficacy in some tumor-types and serious side effects, which limit its clinical utility.2830 Therefore, highly selective chelators with strong toxicity toward cancer cells and less or no side effects on normal cells remain to be identified.

Fig. 1. Representative examples of thiosemicarbazone derivatives.

Fig. 1

A key feature of progressive tumors is having the potential to invade neighboring tissue and to spread throughout the body and form metastatic lesions at distant sites.31 In addition, there is increasing evidence that epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a key step for cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis.32 During the process of EMT, cells lose their epithelial characteristics such as epithelial morphology, cell polarity, and cell–cell contact, and gain mesenchymal properties such as fibroblastic morphology and increased migration and invasion, causing cancer cell metastasis.3336

We have previously reported a novel series of pyrimidine-based hybrids with potent anticancer activity. One of the compounds, 6-LM (Fig. 1), a thiosemicarbazone-containing pyrimidine hybrid, showed marked inhibition of cell migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo.37 To explore the mechanism of compound 6-LM regulated EMT more thoroughly, we designed a series of small molecules and evaluated their antitumor activity using thiosemicarbazone as a minimal scaffold.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

The general route for the synthesis of the target thiosemicarbazones is depicted in Scheme 1. Commercially available 1a–c were reacted with CS2 and hydrazine hydrate in the presence of triethylamine to form compounds 4a–c, which were subjected to reaction with an appropriately substituted aldehyde to afford the target compounds 5a–q with good yields.

Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: a: (i) methanol, triethylamine, rt, 1 h; (ii) hydrazine hydrate 80%, reflux, 3 h; b: methanol, appropriate aldehyde, reflux, 4 h.

Scheme 1

Evaluation of biological activity

Anti-proliferative activity

All the compounds synthesized in this study were examined for their anti-proliferative activity against three human cancer cell lines (commercially available from Cell Bank, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China) such as MGC-803 (human gastric cancer cell line), SMMC-7721 (human liver cancer cell line), and MCF-7 (human breast cancer cell line). 3-AP was chosen as a positive control. The results of preliminary evaluation are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Inhibitory results of the novel thiosemicarbazone derivatives against three cancer cell lines.
Inline graphic
Comp R1 R2 R3 IC50 a (μM)
MGC-803 SMMC-7721 MCF-7
5a graphic file with name c7md00353f-u2.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u3.jpg 29.18 ± 1.46 37.28 ± 1.57 >64
5b graphic file with name c7md00353f-u4.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u5.jpg 16.31 ± 1.21 35.32 ± 1.54 >64
5c graphic file with name c7md00353f-u6.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u7.jpg 20.38 ± 1.46 32.62 ± 1.51 >64
5d graphic file with name c7md00353f-u8.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u9.jpg 56.05 ± 1.74 38.26 ± 1.58 >64
5e graphic file with name c7md00353f-u10.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u11.jpg >64 >64 >64
5f graphic file with name c7md00353f-u12.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u13.jpg 32.59 ± 1.51 >64 >64
5g graphic file with name c7md00353f-u14.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u15.jpg >64 44.88 ± 1.65 >64
5h graphic file with name c7md00353f-u16.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u17.jpg 10.17 ± 1.00 27.34 ± 1.43 41.92 ± 1.62
5i graphic file with name c7md00353f-u18.jpg H graphic file with name c7md00353f-u19.jpg 2.42 ± 0.38 34.06 ± 1.53 12.38 ± 1.09
5j graphic file with name c7md00353f-u20.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u21.jpg 32.61 ± 1.10 >64 44.64 ± 1.65
5k graphic file with name c7md00353f-u22.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u23.jpg 11.17 ± 0.85 >64 49.23 ± 1.69
5l graphic file with name c7md00353f-u24.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u25.jpg >64 >64 >64
5m graphic file with name c7md00353f-u26.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u27.jpg >64 >64 >64
5n graphic file with name c7md00353f-u28.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u29.jpg 0.93 ± 0.02 19.18 ± 1.28 9.99 ± 1.00
5o graphic file with name c7md00353f-u30.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u31.jpg >64 >64 >64
5p graphic file with name c7md00353f-u32.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u33.jpg 3.06 ± 0.48 >64 29.15 ± 1.46
5q graphic file with name c7md00353f-u34.jpg CH3 graphic file with name c7md00353f-u35.jpg 58.37 ± 1.76 >64 >64
3-AP 9.68 ± 0.93 42.81 ± 1.63 18.85 ± 1.27

aInhibitory activity was assayed by exposure to substances for 72 h and expressed as the concentration required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by 50% (IC50). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

During the SAR studies, we found that all synthesized compounds showed a more potent inhibitory activity against MGC-803 than SMMC-7721 and MCF-7. This observation suggests that these compounds may act through targeting specific biological targets that are overexpressed in certain cells. In addition, a slight difference in inhibition of growth of MGC-803 cells was observed for compounds with different substitution patterns. A significant boost in potency came from the substitution with a methyl group in position R2: compound 5p was found to exhibit a single-digit micromolar inhibitory activity (IC50 = 3.06 μM). The same outcome was observed for 5k (IC50 = 11.17 μM), an analog of compound 5a (IC50 = 29.18 μM). Removing the hydroxyl group resulted in decreased potency (5kvs.5j), suggesting that the hydroxyl group is a net contributor to the in vitro potency of the molecule. In addition, it could be noticed that the 2-OH (5k) on the phenyl group (R3) presented a more potent inhibitory effect than the 3-OH (5l) and 4-OH (5m) substitution. Also, the substitution of the phenyl ring with a chloro group in position 5 increased the potency (5pvs.5k, 5bvs.5a). These results revealed that the position of the substituent on the phenyl group (R3) has a remarkable effect on the inhibitory activity. In particular, compound 5n showed the best inhibitory effect against MGC-803 with an IC50 value of 0.93 μM (10-fold more potent than 3-AP).

Because compound 5n exhibits potent proliferative inhibitory activity in vitro, we further characterized the selectivity of this compound against GES-1 (normal human gastric epithelial cell line). As can be seen in Table 2, we found that compound 5n did not show a significant inhibitory effect on GES-1, compared to the positive control, 3-AP. Our findings indicate that compound 5n has good selectivity between cancer and normal cells.

Table 2. Inhibitory results of compound 5n and 3-AP against the normal gastric epithelial cell line GES-1 and the gastric cancer cell line MGC-803.
Comp IC50 a (μM)
GES-1 MGC-803
5n 27.93 ± 1.254 0.93 ± 0.02
3-AP 5.40 ± 0.73 9.68 ± 0.93

aInhibitory activity was assayed by exposure for 72 h to substances and expressed as the concentration required to inhibit normal and tumor cell proliferation by 50% (IC50). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

Among those compounds, we chose compound 5n, exhibiting the most potent activity against MGC-803 with an IC50 value of 0.93 ± 0.02 μmol L–1, to further investigate its inhibitory effect on MGC-803. As shown in Fig. 2A, the antiproliferative activity of compound 5n against MGC-803 is presented in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner with IC50 values of >64, 9.22 ± 0.96, and 0.93 ± 0.02 μmol L–1 at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, respectively. The colony formation assay shown in Fig. 2B also demonstrated that compound 5n could inhibit the proliferation of MGC-803.

Fig. 2. Effects of compound 5n on the proliferation of the human gastric cancer cell line MGC-803. (A) MGC-803 were treated with compound 5n at different concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, then the MTT assay was used to evaluate its effect on cell viability; (B) the colony formation after treatment with compound 5n at different concentrations for 7 days; (C) effect of compound 5n on the cell cycle distribution of MGC-803. Cells were treated with different concentrations of compound 5n for 48 h. Then, the cells were fixed and stained with PI to analyze their DNA content by flow cytometry. The experiments were performed three times, and a representative experiment is shown.

Fig. 2

To better understand the anti-proliferative activity of compound 5n against MGC-803, cell-cycle analysis was performed. After treatment with compound 5n for 48 h, it was observed that the percentage of cells in the S phase was 28.4%, 32.82%, 46.07%, and 51.85% at different concentrations of 0, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 μmol L–1, respectively, which demonstrated that compound 5n caused an obvious S-phase arrest pattern against MGC-803 in a dose-dependent manner.

Anti-migration and anti-invasion assays

As described in the introduction, the migration and invasion ability of tumor cells is an intractable problem in cancer therapy, while EMT is tightly associated with the migration and invasion of tumor cells. Excitingly, compound 5n could potently inhibit this transition. As shown in Fig. 3, wound healing, transwell and matrigel-coated transwell assays all demonstrated that compound 5n could inhibit the migration and invasion ability of MGC-803 in a dose-dependent manner.

Fig. 3. Compound 5n blocked the migration and invasion of MGC-803. (A) Anti-migration analysis performed using the wound healing assay after treatment of MGC-803 cells with compound 5n for 48 h; (B) anti-migration and anti-invasion analyses performed using transwell and matrigel-coated transwell assays, respectively, after treatment of MGC-803 cells with compound 5n for 48 h; (C) expression of E-cadherin and N-cadherin in MGC-803 cells after treatment with compound 5n for 48 h. **P < 0.01 was considered statistically highly significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD. All experiments were carried out at least three times.

Fig. 3

We also examined the expression of some typical proteins of the EMT process. The western blotting assay showed that compound 5n could up-regulate the expression of the epithelial cell biomarker, E-cadherin, while the mesenchymal cell biomarker, N-cadherin, is down-regulated. These data indicated that compound 5n may impair the migration and invasion ability of MGC-803 cells through inhibiting the EMT process.

Cell apoptosis analysis

Inducing the apoptosis of tumor cells is considered a major way to defeat cancer. Due to its potent activity against MGC-803 cells, compound 5n was chosen to evaluate its influence on the apoptosis of MGC-803 cells. We observed the morphology of MGC-803 under the treatment of compound 5n at different concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 μmol L–1) for 48 h, and the changes in the morphology were observed by fluorescence microscopy using Hoechst 33258 staining. As shown in Fig. 4A, with increasing compound concentration, the typical apoptotic markers, including cell rounding, chromatin shrinkage and apoptotic bodies, become more and more frequently compared with the control. Meanwhile, the data obtained using Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining implied that after 48 h of treatment with compound 5n, the total percentage of early apoptosis and late apoptosis increased up to 10.9%, 16.4%, and 32.3% compared to the control (3.7%), which was presented in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4. Compound 5n induced apoptosis in MGC-803. (A) Apoptosis analysis using Hoechst-33258 staining after treatment of MGC-803 cells with compound 5n for 48 h; (B) quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells using Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining and flow-cytometry calculation; quadrant Q2 represents live cells, quadrant Q3 is for early/primary apoptotic cells, and quadrant Q4 is for late/secondary apoptotic cells, while quadrant Q1 represents cells damaged during the procedure; (C) expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in MGC-803 cells after treatment with compound 5n for 48 h. **P < 0.01 was considered statistically highly significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD. All experiments were carried out at least three times.

Fig. 4

To further clarify the mechanism of the apoptosis induced by compound 5n, we investigated the key proteins in the mitochondria-related apoptotic pathway. As shown in Fig. 4C, the pro-apoptotic protein, Bax, was up-regulated after the treatment with compound 5n, while the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2, was down-regulated, which were all presented in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings indicated that compound 5n may be involved in mitochondria-related apoptosis.

Conclusions

In summary, we have synthesized and identified a series of thiosemicarbazone-based analogues as potent and selective antiproliferative agents to modulate cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion. The structure–activity relationship study showed that compound 5n had the best inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 0.93 μM (about 10-fold more potent than 3-AP) against MGC-803 without significant cytotoxicity against gastric epithelial immortalized GES-1 cells. Further mechanism studies revealed that compound 5n regulates the proliferation activity of MGC-803 cells by inducing apoptosis, arresting the cell cycle at the S phase, and inhibiting the EMT. Further SAR and mechanistic studies on the selectivity toward MGC-803 cells are ongoing in our laboratories and will be reported in due course.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 81430085 and No. 21372206 for H.-M. L. and No. 81703328 for L.-Y. M.); the National Key Research Program of Proteins (No. 2016YFA0501800); the Key Research Program of Henan Province (No. 1611003110100 for H.-M. L.).

Footnotes

†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7md00353f

References

  1. Yu Y., Wong J., Lovejoy D. B., Kalinowski D. S., Richardson D. R. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:6876–6883. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buss J. L., Torti F. M., Torti S. V. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003;10:1021–1034. doi: 10.2174/0929867033457638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaston T. B., Lovejoy D. B., Watts R. N., Richardson D. R. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:402–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kovacevic Z., Kalinowski D. S., Lovejoy D. B., Yu Y., Suryo Rahmanto Y., Sharpe P. C., Bernhardt P. V., Richardson D. R. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011;11:483–499. doi: 10.2174/156802611794785190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu Y., Gutierrez E., Kovacevic Z., Saletta F., Obeidy P., Suryo Rahmanto Y., Richardson D. R. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012;19:2689–2702. doi: 10.2174/092986712800609706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tisato F., Marzano C., Porchia M., Pellei M., Santini C. Med. Res. Rev. 2010;30:708–749. doi: 10.1002/med.20174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lovejoy D. B., Jansson P. J., Brunk U. T., Wong J., Ponka P., Richardson D. R. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5871–5880. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zeglis B. M., Divilov V., Lewis J. S. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:2391–2398. doi: 10.1021/jm101532u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palanimuthu D., Shinde S. V., Somasundaram K., Samuelson A. G. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:722–734. doi: 10.1021/jm300938r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowley A. R., Davis J., Dilworth J. R., Donnelly P. S., Dobson R., Nightingale A., Peach J. M., Shore B., Kerr D., Seymour L. Chem. Commun. 2005:845–847. doi: 10.1039/b417206j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pascu S. I., Waghorn P. A., Conry T. D., Lin B., Betts H. M., Dilworth J. R., Sim R. B., Churchill G. C., Aigbirhio F. I., Warren J. E. Dalton Trans. 2008:2107–2110. doi: 10.1039/b802806k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kowol C. R., Trondl R., Arion V. B., Jakupec M. A., Lichtscheidl I., Keppler B. K. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:704–706. doi: 10.1039/b919119b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stacy A. E., Palanimuthu D., Bernhardt P. V., Kalinowski D. S., Jansson P. J., Richardson D. R. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:4965–4984. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yu Y., Kalinowski D. S., Kovacevic Z., Siafakas A. R., Jansson P. J., Stefani C., Lovejoy D. B., Sharpe P. C., Bernhardt P. V., Richardson D. R. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:5271–5294. doi: 10.1021/jm900552r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Finch R. A., Liu M., Grill S. P., Rose W. C., Loomis R., Vasquez K. M., Cheng Y., Sartorelli A. C. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000;59:983–991. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00419-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuan J., Lovejoy D. B., Richardson D. R. Blood. 2004;104:1450–1458. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richardson D. R., Sharpe P. C., Lovejoy D. B., Senaratne D., Kalinowski D. S., Islam M., Bernhardt P. V. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:6510–6521. doi: 10.1021/jm0606342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kowol C. R., Berger R., Eichinger R., Roller A., Jakupec M. A., Schmidt P. P., Arion V. B., Keppler B. K. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:1254–1265. doi: 10.1021/jm0612618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kowol C. R., Eichinger R., Jakupec M. A., Galanski M., Arion V. B., Keppler B. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007;101:1946–1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Richardson D. R., Kalinowski D. S., Richardson V., Sharpe P. C., Lovejoy D. B., Islam M., Bernhardt P. V. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:1459–1470. doi: 10.1021/jm801585u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lovejoy D. B., Sharp D. M., Seebacher N., Obeidy P., Prichard T., Stefani C., Basha M. T., Sharpe P. C., Jansson P. J., Kalinowski D. S., Bernhardt P. V., Richardson D. R. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:7230–7244. doi: 10.1021/jm300768u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lovejoy D. B., Richardson D. R. Blood. 2002;100:666–676. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.2.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kovacevic Z., Chikhani S., Lovejoy D. B., Richardson D. R. Mol. Pharmacol. 2011;80:598–609. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.073627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu Y., Suryo Rahmanto Y., Richardson D. R. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;165:148–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01526.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mackenzie M. J., Saltman D., Hirte H., Low J., Johnson C., Pond G., Moore M. J. Invest. New Drugs. 2007;25:553–558. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Karp J. E., Giles F. J., Gojo I., Morris L., Greer J., Johnson B., Thein M., Sznol M., Low J. Leuk. Res. 2008;32:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma B., Goh B. C., Tan E. H., Lam K. C., Soo R., Leong S. S., Wang L. Z., Mo F., Chan A. T., Zee B., Mok T. Invest. New Drugs. 2008;26:169–173. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yen Y., Margolin K., Doroshow J., Fishman M., Johnson B., Clairmont C., Sullivan D., Sznol M. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2004;54:331–342. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0821-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Knox J. J., Hotte S. J., Kollmannsberger C., Winquist E., Fisher B., Eisenhauer E. A. Invest. New Drugs. 2007;25:471–477. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Traynor A. M., Lee J. W., Bayer G. K., Tate J. M., Thomas S. P., Mazurczak M., Graham D. L., Kolesar J. M., Schiller J. H. Invest. New Drugs. 2010;28:91–97. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9230-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chu S. C., Yu C. C., Hsu L. S., Chen K. S., Su M. Y., Chen P. N. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014;86:609–623. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.094037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamouille S., Xu J., Derynck R. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–196. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thiery J. P., Sleeman J. P. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:131–142. doi: 10.1038/nrm1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thiery J. P., Acloque H., Huang R. Y., Nieto M. A. Cell. 2009;139:871–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Berx G., Raspe E., Christofori G., Thiery J. P., Sleeman J. P. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2007;24:587–597. doi: 10.1007/s10585-007-9114-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jechlinger M., Grunert S., Tamir I. H., Janda E., Ludemann S., Waerner T., Seither P., Weith A., Beug H., Kraut N. Oncogene. 2003;22:7155–7169. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma L. Y., Zheng Y. C., Wang S. Q., Wang B., Wang Z. R., Pang L. P., Zhang M., Wang J. W., Ding L., Li J., Wang C., Hu B., Liu Y., Zhang X. D., Wang J. J., Wang Z. J., Zhao W., Liu H. M. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:1705–1716. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from MedChemComm are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES