A miniaturized assay was set up to test a set of natural products against protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). By using several read-out and counter assays, berberine and palmatine were identified as PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds) and α-TOS as a novel inhibitor of PTP1B.
Abstract
A highly miniaturized biochemical assay was set up to test a focused set of natural products against the enzymatic activity of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). The screen resulted in the identification of the natural product alkaloids, berberine and palmatine as well as α-tocopheryl succinate (α-TOS) as potential inhibitors of PTP1B. In a second step, several read-out and counter assays were applied to confirm the observed inhibitory activity of the identified hits and to remove false positives which target the enzymatic activity of PTP1B by a non-specific mechanism, also known as PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds). Both, berberine and palmatine were identified as false positives which interfered with the assay read-out. Using NMR spectroscopy, self-association via stacking interactions was detected for berberine in aqueous media, which may also contribute to the non-specific inhibition of PTP1B. α-TOS was confirmed as a novel reversible and competitive inhibitor of PTP1B. A concise structure–activity relationship study identified the carboxyl group and the saturated phytyl-side chain as being critical for PTP1B inhibition.
1. Introduction
Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a key enzyme in the negative regulation of the insulin receptor and leptin signaling pathway. As an attractive therapeutic target, PTP1B is involved in the pathophysiology of type II diabetes and obesity.1,2 PTP1B overexpression causes insulin resistance by constant dephosphorylation of the insulin receptor. In contrast, PTP1B inhibition causes an increase in sensitivity towards insulin as demonstrated in PTP1B knock-out mice.3,4 Small molecule inhibitors of PTP1B, which restore the degree of insulin receptor phosphorylation are therefore highly desired due to their potential for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity.1,5,6
Several small molecule inhibitors of PTP1B with competitive7–10 and allosteric11,12 mechanism of action have been reported (Fig. 1). The majority of these inhibitors were discovered by screening of large libraries using biochemical assays.
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of a selection of reported inhibitors of PTP1B. Including both fragments 1 (ref. 7 and 8) and 2,9 the allosteric inhibitor 3 (ref. 11) and the natural product 4.10.
In this letter, we present the miniaturization of an in vitro biochemical assay to monitor the enzymatic activity of PTP1B enzyme. Testing of a focused set of natural products resulted in the identification of several primary active compounds. Additional assays were utilized to remove hit compounds acting through unwanted effects such as self-association in aqueous solution or interfering with the assay read-out. As a result, a novel, reversible and competitive inhibitor against PTP1B has been identified.
2. Results and discussion
The assay is centered on difluoromethylumbelliferyl phosphate (DifMUP), an artificial and fluorogenic substrate for phosphatases.13,14 The hydrolysis of the arylphosphate moiety by PTP1B generates a highly fluorescence product. In the presence of a potential inhibitor DifMUP remains phosphorylated and no fluorescent signal is detected. The assay was miniaturized to high density plate format (1536-well plates) and applied as a primary assay to screen a focused set of natural products. The PTP1B enzyme (1–298 aa) was used at an optimized concentration of 5 nM.
To have an adequate rate and good assay signal, the concentration of the artificial substrate DifMUP was set at 30 μM, which is twelvefold higher than the reported KM value (KM DifMUP = 2.5 μM13). During the assay miniaturization and screening, fragment 18 was used as a positive control. The miniaturization was conducted by using a V-prep automated pipetting station (Agilent Technologies). The miniaturized assay was highly robust with good performance: Z′ = 0.8 (no enzyme as low control); Z′ = 0.6 (100 μM fragment 1 as low control). A representative partially filled 1536-well uniformity plate is highlighted in Fig. 2A.15 Natural products are considered as a diverse source for the discovery of bioactive compounds in hit identification programs.16 Several molecules derived from natural source have been reported to inhibit the activity of PTP1B17 and were used as tool compounds in the anti-diabetic drug discovery.18 Following this approach, we have screened a focused set of natural products in the miniaturized biochemical assay. As a result, we identified several active compounds in the primary assay, among them berberine (5; IC50 ∼ 67 μM) and the structurally related palmatine (6; IC50 ∼ 234 μM) as well as α-TOS (7; IC50 ∼ 20 μM) see Fig. 2B.
Fig. 2. Outcome of the biochemical testing of a focused set of natural products. A) Assay performance in a 1536-well uniformity plate (high control = DMSO only; low control = no enzyme and low control with an inhibitor = in the presence of 100 μM of fragment 1) and B) constitution of the identified primary active molecules.
Berberine (5) is an alkaloid extracted from various plants used in traditional Chinese medicine. It has been used as an insulin sensitizer and is commercially available as food supplement for its anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Berberine has been described in the literature by two independent groups as an inhibitor of PTB1B.19–21 α-TOS (7) is a chiral molecule which is used in dietary supplements as a vitamin E dosage form and has anti-cancer activity. The pro-apoptotic properties of α-TOS (7) is thought to be based on targeting ubiquinone-binding sites in mitochondrial respiratory complex II.22
Fluorescence/luminescence-based high-throughput enzyme inhibition screens often deliver compounds which interfere with the assay readout or inhibit the enzyme of interest in a nonspecific fashion. Identifying such compounds, also known as pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS),23 represents a challenge for screening campaigns.24 Several assays therefore were put in place to confirm the observed inhibitory effect of the identified primary active molecules and to filter out any non-specific inhibition. These assays were designed to identify promiscuous inhibitors of PTP1B enzyme and compounds prone to aggregation and read-out interference.
First the interference of identified compounds with the readout was investigated. Here the inhibitors were added after the completion of the enzymatic reaction of PTP1B. PTP1B was therefore incubated with DifMUP, and after the conversion of the artificial substrate, the enzyme was deactivated with hydrogen peroxide and the compounds were added. Compounds interfering with the fluorescence readout were identified by a reduction of the fluorescence signal.
The tool compound 1 and α-TOS (7) showed no interference in the read-out counter assay, whereas berberine (5) and palmitine (6), both clearly interfered with the assay read-out (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Concentration–response curves of identified hits in the primary assay (black circles) and in the read-out counter assay (grey circles).
Berberine has an absorption maxima ∼430 nm, which overlaps with the emission spectra of the product. An effect known as “inner filter effect”. Czaplewski et al. also challenged the genuine effect of berberine as a specific inhibitor.25 This paper pointed out that a wide range of activities have been reported for berberine (antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anticancer, anti-infective and anti-diabetic activities), which makes a specific mode of action very unlikely.25 Sun et al. tested the physicochemical properties of berberine by using light scattering assay in order to rule out unselective inhibition by formation of aggregates. However, no aggregates were found using this assay.26
In this current publication, we used an NMR based approach27 to further study the physicochemical properties of berberine (5). 1D-1H NMR spectra were recorded for a dilution series of 500 μM to 32 μM compound concentration in aqueous media. As highlighted in Fig. 4, clear shifts of berberine resonances as a function of compound concentration can be observed in the aromatic region. This effect suggests self-association of the compound. Specifically, the reduction of compound concentration shows a corresponding downfield shift of the compound resonances by ∼22 Hz. This observation is in line with a de-shielding effect of the aromatic protons implicating a loss of stacking interaction. This observed compound self-association may also contribute to an unspecific inhibition of the PTP1B enzymatic activity.28 This hypothesis was confirmed by testing methylene blue, which had the same self-association properties in the NMR assay, in the primary assay. Methylene blue was found to be an inhibitor of the activity of PTP1B (ESI‡).
Fig. 4. Aromatic region of a series of 1H-NMR spectra superimposed from various concentrations of berberine (5) (dilutions from 500 μM (black spectrum) to 32 μM (orange spectra) from top to bottom). The buffer employed for these studies was 5 mM TRIS pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl in 5% DMSO-d6.
Finally, to rule out another source of false positives in search for inhibitors against cysteine-containing enzymes, the intrinsic redox activity of α-TOS (7) was tested. Redox active compounds interfere with PTP1B enzymatic activity directly or indirectly via hydrogen peroxide mediated protein inactivation. The inactivation is caused by the oxidation of the active cysteine in the catalytic center of PTP1B.29,30 The non-enzymatic redox activity of α-TOS (7) in reducing environment was tested by using an assay reported by Lor et al. from GlaxoSmithKline.31 As expected, no redox activity was observed for alpha-TOS (data not shown). This finding is in line with the commonly used description of α-TOS (7) as a redox-silent vitamin E analogue.
A concise structure–activity relationship (SAR) study was performed by testing some close analogues of α-TOS (7) (compounds 8, 9 and 11; see Fig. 5). In order to investigate the contribution of the hydrophobic tail of α-TOS (7), analogue 11 was synthesized. Starting from 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethyl-6-chromanol 10 as a precursor and following the succinic anhydride route via ring opening reaction32 the product 11 was formed in excellent yield33 (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 5. SAR study and mode of inhibition of α-TOS (7). A) Constitution of the α-TOS analogues, B) synthesis route for the preparation of the truncated analogue (11). C) Testing of analogues 7, 8, 9 and 11 in the primary assay. D) Inhibitory activity of α-TOS (7) at different DifMUP concentrations.
Loss of inhibitory activity was observed when: i) the carboxyl-group was removed (8) and replaced by an acetyl group (9), or ii) when the phytyl side chain was removed (11) (Fig. 5C). This observation implies that both groups, the carboxyl group and the hydrophobic tail, are necessary for the inhibitory activity of α-TOS (7). The observed SAR outcome is also in line with the chemical constitution of reported PTP1B inhibitors shown in Fig. 1, both fragments (1 and 2) have the carboxyl moiety and the natural product RK682 (compound 4) has a hydrophobic aliphatic chain contributing to the inhibition. Notably, other reported PTP1B inhibitors such as corosolic acid, oleanolic acid and ursolic acid have similar structural features consisting of a polar carboxy-group and a hydrophobic moiety.34,35 We postulate that the hydrophilic carboxyl group probably acts as a phosphate surrogate, whereas the phytyl tail potentially forms attractive hydrophobic interaction with the protein. It has been reported that the hydrophobic side chain of bioactive molecules can indeed participate in specific interactions and forms distinct contacts with the target protein.35
In a final experiment, the competitive mode of action of this molecule was confirmed by testing the inhibitory activity in the presence of different concentrations of the substrate (Fig. 5D). The reversibility of the inhibition of PTP1B by α-TOS (7) was also confirmed by running time course experiments, following the enzymatic inhibition and subsequent addition of 10-fold excess of DifMUP, which resulted in the recovery of the enzymatic activity (data not shown).
Due to the charged and polar function of the hit molecule 7, we assumed that the molecule occupies the active site, deep within the catalytic A site of PTP1B. The crystal structure of PTP1B (PDB ID: ; 2HNQ)36 from protein data bank was used for the docking study (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. A proposed binding mode of 7 bound to PTP1B.
The docking study37 revealed that the carboxyl-group of compound 7 forms several hydrogen bonds, among them also with Arg221. This attractive interaction was also found in the co-crystal structures of fragments 1 and 2 bound to PTP1B,7–9 and explains the observed SAR results highlighted in Fig. 5.
In summary, a fully developed highly miniaturized biochemical primary assay was used to monitor the enzymatic activity of the PTP1B phosphatase. Testing of a focused set of natural products resulted in the identification of several hits. A selection of assays was applied to remove hit compounds acting through unwanted effects. This in-depth evaluation, identified berberine (5) and palmatine (6) as false positives, interfering with the assay read-out and self-associate in aqueous solution. α-TOS (7), in contrast appears to be a novel, reversible and competitive inhibitor against PTP1B.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Lazlo Kiss and Dr. Kenneth Young for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript.
Footnotes
†The authors declare no competing interests.
‡Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7md00126f
References
- Johnson T. O., Ermolieff J., Jirousek M. R. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2002;5:518. doi: 10.1038/nrd895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hooft van Huijsduijnen R., Sauer W. H., Bombrun A., Swinnen D. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:4142. doi: 10.1021/jm030629n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elchebly M., Payette P., Michaliszyn E., Cromlish W., Collins S., Loy A. L., Normandin D., Cheng A., Himms-Hagen J., Chan C. C., Ramachandran C., Gresser M. J., Tremblay M. L., Kennedy B. P. Science. 1999;283:1544. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5407.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaman L. D., Boss O., Peroni O. D., Kim J. K., Martino J. L., Zabolotny J. M., Moghal N., Lubkin M., Kim Y. B., Sharpe A. H., Stricker-Krongrad A., Shulman G. I., Neel B. G., Kahn B. B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:5479. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.15.5479-5489.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Combs A. P. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:2333. doi: 10.1021/jm901090b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S., Zhang Z. Y. Drug Discovery Today. 2007;12:373. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersen H. S., Olsen O. H., Iversen L. F., Sørensen A. L., Mortensen S. B., Christensen M. S., Branner S., Hansen T. K., Lau J. F., Jeppesen L., Moran E. J., Su J., Bakir F., Judge L., Shahbaz M., Collins T., Vo T., Newman M. J., Ripka W. C., Møller N. P. J. Med. Chem. 2002;45:4443. doi: 10.1021/jm0209026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iverson H. A., Fox D., Nadler L. S., Klevit R. E., Nathanson N. M. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;26:4568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501264200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczepankiewicz B. G., Liu G., Hajduk P. J., Abad-Zapatero C., Pei Z., Xin Z., Lubben T. H., Trevillyan J. M., Stashko M. A., Ballaron S. J., Liang H., Huang F., Hutchins C. W., Fesik S. W., Jirousek M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:4087. doi: 10.1021/ja0296733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamaguchi T., Sudo T., Osada H. FEBS Lett. 1995;372:54. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00953-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiesmann C., Barr K. J., Kung J., Zhu J., Erlanson D. A., Shen W., Fahr B. J., Zhong M., Taylor L., Randal M., McDowell R. S., Hansen S. K. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:730. doi: 10.1038/nsmb803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan N., Koveal D., Miller D. H., Xue B., Akshinthala S. D., Kragelj J., Jensen M. R., Gauss C. M., Page R., Blackledge M., Muthuswamy S. K., Peti W., Tonks N. K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:558. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perrin D., Frémaux C., Besson D., Sauer W. H., Scheer A. J. Biomol. Screening. 2006;11:996. doi: 10.1177/1087057106294094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fahs S., Lujan P., Köhn M. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016;11:2944. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miniaturized fluorescence intensity assay: the measurements were performed in 1536-well Greiner microplates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC, USA, cat # 782076). All reagents used in the assay were diluted in the assay buffer (50 mM citrate buffer; 100 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 0.1 mM DTT; 0.01% Brij35 pH 6.0) except for H2O2 (0.5% final assay concentration) which was diluted in ddH2O and was used as a reaction-stop-solution at the end of theO and was used as a reaction-stop-solution at the end of the assay workflow. The PTP1B assay workflow-procedure is as following: first, 0.3 μl of compound (diluted in 100% DMSO) was incubated with 3 μl of the 1–298 aa long PTP1B enzyme (5 nM final concentration) for 30 min at RT in the dark. Then 3 μl of DifMUP (DifMUP-substrate at 30 μM final concentration) was added and the reaction was incubated for 30 min at RT. Afterwards, 1.5 μl Hassay workflow. The PTP1B assay workflow-procedure is as following: first, 0.3 μl of compound (diluted in 100% DMSO) was incubated with 3 μl of the 1–298 aa long PTP1B enzyme (5 nM final concentration) for 30 min at RT in the dark. Then 3 μl of DifMUP (DifMUP-substrate at 30 μM final concentration) was added and the reaction was incubated for 30 min at RT. Afterwards, 1.5 μl H2O2 stop-solution (0.5% H2O2 final concentration) was added and the plate incubated for 30 min at RT. Subsequently, the plate was measured on a Tecan Safire 2 Multimode Reader (Tecan). Fluorescence intensity values were detected by using an excitation wavelength at 360 nm and an emission wavelength at 450 nm
- DeCorte B. L. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:9295. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang C. S., Liang L. F., Guo Y. W. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012;33:1217. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey A. L. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010;14:1670. [Google Scholar]
- Bustanji Y., Taha M. O., Yousef A. M., Al-Bakri A. G. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2006;21:163. doi: 10.1080/14756360500533026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C., Zhang Y., Huang C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;397:543. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi J. S., Ali M. Y., Jung H. A., Oh S. H., Choi R. J., Kim E. J. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;171:28. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong L. F., Low P., Dyason J. C., Wang X. F., Prochazka L., Witting P. K., Freeman R., Swettenham E., Valis K., Liu J., Zobalova R., Turanek J., Spitz D. R., Domann F. E., Scheffler I. E., Ralph S. J., Neuzil J. Oncogene. 2008;31:4324. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baell J. B., Holloway G. A. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:2719. doi: 10.1021/jm901137j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoichet B. K. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;11:607. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czaplewski L. G., Stokes N. R., Steve R. and Haydon D. J., Antibiotic Discovery and Development, Springer, 2012, ch. 30, p. 957. [Google Scholar]
- Sun N., Chan F., Lu Y., Neves M. A. C., Lui H., Wang J., Chow K., Chan K., Yan S., Leung Y., Abagyan R., Chan T., Wong K. PLoS One. 2014;5:e97514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaPlante S. R., Carson R., Gillard J., Aubry N., Coulombe R., Bordeleau S., Bonneau P., Little M., O’Meara J., Beaulieu P. L. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:5142. doi: 10.1021/jm400535b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aldrich C., Bertozzi C., Georg G., Kiessling L., Lindsley C., Liotta D., Merz K. M., Schepartz A., Wang S. J. Med. Chem. 2017;60:2165. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin K. R., Narang P., Medina-Franco J. L., Meurice N., MacKeigan J. P. Methods. 2014;65:219. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Montfort R. L., Congreve M., Tisi D., Carr R., Jhoti H. Nature. 2003;423:773. doi: 10.1038/nature01681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lor L. A., Schneck J., McNulty D. E., Diaz E., Brandt M., Thrall S. H., Schwartz B. J. Biomol. Screening. 2007;12:881. doi: 10.1177/1087057107304113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipshutz B. H., Ghorai S., Abela A. R., Moser R., Nishikata T., Duplais C., Krasovskiy A., Gaston R. D., Gadwood R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:4379. doi: 10.1021/jo101974u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis of 11: 1.1 g (5 mmol), of 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethyl-6-chromanol (10) and 0.75 g (1.5 eq., 7.5 mmol) succinate anhydride were dissolved in 10 mL toluene. To this solution 0.2 mL NEt3 was added. The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 6 h. After the completion of the reaction water was added and organic phase extracted by CH2Cl2. The organic phase was repeatedly washed with water and diluted acetic acid and dried over MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using cyclohexane : ethyl acetate (3 : 1) as eluent to afford 1.56 g (98% yield) of the desired product (11) as a white powder 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 2.94 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H); 2.84 (t, J = 6.8, 2H); 2.59 (t, J = 6.8, 2H); 2.09 (s, 3H); 1.928 (s, 3H); 1.92 (s, 3H); 1.72 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H); 1.21 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 177.9, 170.8, 149.5, 140.4, 126.7, 124.9, 123.0, 117.2, 73.0, 32.7, 28.9, 28.6, 26.7, 20.9, 12.9, 12.0, 11, 8. ESI calculated for C18O5H24: 320.38 g mol–1; found: 321.17 MH+ (purity > 99%)
- Na M., Cui L., Min B. S., Bae K., Yoo J. K., Kim B. Y., Oh W. K., Ahn J. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;12:3273. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y. N., Zhang W., Hong D., Shi L., Shen Q., Li J. Y., Li J., Hu L. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18:8697. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.07.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angerer H., Nasiri H. R., Niedergesäβ V., Kerscher S., Schwalbe H., Brandt U. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;10:1776. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barford D., Flint A. J., Tonks N. K. Science. 1994;11:1397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






