Abstract
Valgus extension overload syndrome (VEO) is the result of supraphysiologic stresses placed across the posterior elbow during pitching. Following failure of nonoperative measures, surgical options consist of arthroscopic or limited incision posteromedial decompression. Although technically challenging, arthroscopic treatment offers many advantages over open treatment, including improved joint visualization, decreased soft-tissue dissection, decreased postoperative pain, and quicker rehabilitation. Arthroscopic treatment of VEO consists of soft tissue and bony debridement, loose body removal, and osteophyte resection. This technique report details the steps of arthroscopic treatment of VEO in a patient with a subluxating ulnar nerve.
The supraphysiologic demands of pitching generate tensile stresses across the medial elbow. Over time, such repetitive stresses will compromise the integrity of the medial ulnar collateral ligament and lead to valgus instability. Valgus instability will trigger a cascade of pathology affecting the other compartments of the elbow.1 On the posterior side, shear stresses between the medial olecranon tip and olecranon fossa will lead to osteophytes and loose bodies, culminating in valgus extension overload syndrome (VEO).2, 3 Overhead athletes with VEO have a painful throwing motion and decreased throwing velocity. First-line treatment for VEO is nonoperative: rest from throwing, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular steroid injections, assessment of pitching mechanics, and so on.
Following failure of nonoperative measures, surgical options include arthroscopic olecranon debridement or limited incision decompression. Among the benefits of arthroscopic (over open) treatment are limited morbidity to soft tissues and a more complete diagnostic evaluation of the elbow.4, 5, 6 The purpose of this technique is to describe the arthroscopic treatment of VEO in a patient with a subluxating ulnar nerve (Video 1).
Surgical Technique
Anesthesia and Patient Positioning
A preoperative elbow exam should be done on the day of surgery. Specifically, assessment should be done for a subluxating ulnar nerve. In addition, the resting position of the ulnar nerve relative to the medial epicondyle should be noted as this information can impact portal selection. General anesthesia is administered; regional anesthesia is avoided so that a complete neurologic exam can be performed immediately postoperatively. The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position on a bean bag. The nonoperative upper extremity is forward flexed, externally rotated, and placed on a padded arm board. A padded roll is placed under the patient's contralateral axilla, positioned between the patient and operating room table. The contralateral lower extremity is flexed slightly at the knee with all bony prominences padded and the peroneal nerve around the fibular neck unencumbered. The operative extremity is draped over an elbow arm holder such that the forearm is perpendicular to the floor. Prior to prepping and draping, the extremity is ranged through simulated operative positions to ensure no obstructions are present (Fig 1).
Diagnostic Arthroscopy
After draping, all relevant surface anatomy is marked, including bony landmarks, location of the fractured olecranon osteophyte, and potential portals to be used (Fig 2). One to two milligrams of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine is injected into each portal site for local anesthesia and local hemostasis. The markings are covered with a sponge, an Esmarch bandage is applied, and the extremity is exsanguinated. The elbow joint is insufflated with 15 mg of normal saline through the lateral soft spot portal formed between the lateral epicondyle, radial head, and olecranon.
Typically, our preference is to perform a diagnostic arthroscopy beginning in the anterior compartment. A proximal anteromedial portal would be created by incising only the skin within an 11-blade scalpel; a straight blunt clamp would be used to spread soft tissues down to capsule to avoid trauma to the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. A blunt trocar within an arthroscopic sheath is inserted with a trajectory toward the radiocapitellar joint; entry into the joint is confirmed by efflux of saline fluid. A standard 4.0-mm, 30° viewing arthroscope (Smith and Nephew, Andover, MA) is inserted. Specific anterior pathology to be evaluated in a patient with VEO would be osteochondral lesions and/or loose bodies involving the radiocapitellar joint, osteophytes of the coronoid tip and fossa, and chondral lesions of the trochlea. An 18-gauge spinal needle may be placed under direct visualization through the proximal anterolateral portal located 1 to 2 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle and 1 cm anterior to the lateral intermuscular septum; the spinal needle serves as outflow to minimize intra-articular fluid pressures. If debridement within the anterior compartment is necessary, the spinal needle is removed and a formal skin incision is made for the proximal anterolateral portal. A series of sequentially larger dilators (Elbow Arthroscopy Set, Arthrex, Naples, FL) is inserted to expand the portal and facilitate passage of an arthroscopic probe, grasper, or shaver as needed. In the case illustrated (Video 1), a diagnostic arthroscopy of the anterior compartment was not indicated given symptoms, physical examination findings, and imaging localizing pathology to the posterior compartment only. Furthermore, the presence of a subluxating ulnar nerve lying anterior to the medial epicondyle makes anterior compartment arthroscopy risk prohibitive. Finally, although this patient had a subluxating ulnar nerve, he did not have symptoms or exam findings suggestive of an ulnar neuritis; therefore, concurrent ulnar nerve transposition was not indicated.
We proceeded with a posterior compartment arthroscopy. A posterolateral (PL) portal, located along the lateral border of the triceps tendon and 1 cm proximal to the olecranon tip, is established by incising skin and then bluntly spreading soft tissue down to capsule. A blunt trocar within an arthroscopic sheath is inserted with a trajectory toward the articulation of the olecranon. Although overgrowth of the olecranon tip can be appreciated, fibrous tissue overlying the olecranon fossa obscures complete visualization of the olecranon. The lateral gutter is inspected for loose bodies, and the radiocapitellar joint is visualized for articular cartilage damage. Next, a direct posterior (dP) portal is created 2 cm proximal to the olecranon tip, in the midline of the triceps tendon. An 18-gauge spinal needle is inserted at the site of portal creation and triangulated arthroscopically to confirm adequate localization. The dP portal is established by using an 11-blade scalpel to first incise skin only and subsequently penetrate deeper to incise the full thickness of the triceps tendon.
Posterior Compartment Debridement
With the PL portal being used as a visualization portal, an arthroscopic shaver (Smith and Nephew) is inserted into the dP portal. Fibrous tissue overlying the olecranon fossa and tip is debrided (Fig 3A). An arthroscopic electrocautery ablation device may also be used for debridement (Smith and Nephew; Fig 3B). When using a shaver, cautery, or suction device in the posteromedial gutter, consideration must be given to the ulnar nerve located immediately superficial to the capsule; an arthroscopic retractor placed through an accessory PL portal can elevate the capsule and nerve away from the working space. In this case, the ulnar nerve was subluxed anteriorly and therefore protected by the medial epicondyle. The goal of the debridement is to visualize the demarcation between olecranon osteophyte/loose body and normal olecranon bone. Irregular protrusions or “bumps” around the periphery of the olecranon tip suggest encased loose bodies.
A Freer elevator is inserted through the dP portal to probe for a plane between the loose body and normal olecranon (Fig 4A). For fractured osteophytes or encased loose bodies that would be difficult to extract through a portal incision, the Freer elevator should dislodge but not completely detach the bony fragment. By maintaining some fibrous attachments, the fractured osteophyte can remain in a relatively fixed position while a motorized shaver is used to debride it down in size (Fig 4B). Once the bony fragment is of sufficient size to be delivered from a portal incision, either a motorized shaver, ablation device, and/or Freer elevator can be used to free it of any and all fibrous attachments (Fig 4 C and D). To facilitate delivery of the osteophyte from the elbow joint, the arthroscope should be inserted into the dP portal and an arthroscopic grasper should be placed in the PL portal to retrieve the bony fragment (Fig 5 A and B). Delivering bony fragments through the PL portal is easier than through the dP portal because there are fewer layers of soft tissue between the elbow joint and skin to traverse. For example, when retrieving through a dP portal, a large bony fragment would need to maneuvered through the triceps tendon.
The same process described above is repeated for any other osteophytes or encased loose bodies that may be present. In this case, bony fragments that had fractured from the osteophyte were retrieved with an arthroscopic grasper from the posteromedial gutter and the olecranon was contoured with a motorized shaver. We are very diligent to limit our olecranon resection to osteophyte/loose body removal only, avoiding resection of any normal olecranon bone. Multiple studies have reported that excessive resection of the olecranon during posteromedial decompression increases tensile forces across the medial ulnar collateral ligament during valgus stress and thus increases valgus instability.7, 8 If posterior impingement is present even after resecting all olecranon osteophytes, then inspect the humeral side for osteophytes and resect accordingly.9
Postoperative Protocol
All portal incisions are closed with 4-0 nylon sutures in a simple, interrupted manner. A soft compressive dressing is applied. In the postoperative recovery room, an upper extremity neurologic exam is done to assess for nerve injury. The patient is discharged home the same day with instructions to immediately start physical therapy to actively range the elbow. At the 2-week postoperative visit, sutures are removed and physical therapy is progressed to include flexor-pronator strengthening. At 6 weeks following surgery, a supervised throwing program is begun. The patient can expect to return to competitive throwing at 3 to 4 months postoperatively.
Discussion
VEO is the most common elbow pathology requiring surgical intervention in baseball players as well as other elite athletes requiring overhead throwing.10, 11 Arthroscopic treatment of this syndrome consists of posteromedial elbow decompression with resection of olecranon osteophytes and removal of loose bodies. Although no singular study has specifically evaluated the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of VEO, many studies have reported outcomes on open and/or arthroscopic treatment of posterior elbow impingement in athletes.3, 10, 11, 12 Reddy et al.11 reported on 187 arthroscopic elbow procedures with the most common diagnoses being posterior impingement (51%), loose bodies (22%), and degenerative joint disease (22%). Eighty-seven percent of patients reported good to excellent outcomes, and 85% of baseball players were able to return to their preinjury level of competition.11
Among the benefits of arthroscopic treatment of VEO over limited incision decompression are improved joint visualization, decreased soft-tissue dissection, decreased postoperative pain, and quicker rehabilitation.4, 5, 6 Among the risks of arthroscopic treatment are injury to major neurovascular structures during portal creation and iatrogenic valgus instability during aggressive resection of olecranon osteophytes.4, 5, 6 The pearls and pitfalls of our surgical procedure are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1.
Pearls and Pitfalls |
---|
• Preoperative upper extremity neurologic exam must be done to document subluxation of ulnar nerve and its resting position. |
• Correlate patient symptoms, exam, and imaging findings to site of operative pathology. |
• Simulation of elbow movements and instrument passage required during surgery should be done prior to prepping and draping to minimize positioning issues during the case. |
• Suction should be avoided in the posteromedial gutter to minimize risk of injury to the adjacent ulnar nerve. |
• Use a blunt instrument such as a Freer elevator to develop a plane to dislodge encased loose bodies. |
• Extricate large loose bodies or osteophytes through the posterolateral portal. |
• Do not resect native olecranon bone. |
• If posterior impingement persists following olecranon osteophyte resection, then search for other sources of impingement: osteophytes on humeral side, loose bodies in posterior radiocapitellar joint. |
Footnotes
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Paulino F.E., Villacis D.C., Ahmad C.S. Valgus extension overload in baseball players. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2016;45:144–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fleisig G.S., Barrentine S.W., Escamilla R.F., Andrews J.R. Biomechanics of overhand throwing with implications for injuries. Sports Med. 1996;21:421–437. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199621060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilson F.D., Andrews J.R., Blackburn T.A., McCluskey G. Valgus extension overload in the pitching elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:83–88. doi: 10.1177/036354658301100206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kelly E.W., Morrey B.F., O'Driscoll S.W. Complications of elbow arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:25–34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nelson G.N., Wu T., Galatz L.M., Yamaguchi K., Keener J.D. Elbow arthroscopy: Early complications and associated risk factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O'Driscoll S.W., Morrey B.F. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits and hazards. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:84–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kamineni S., Hirahara H., Pomianowski S. Partial posteromedial olecranon resection: A kinematic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1005–1011. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kamineni S., ElAttrache N.S., O'Driscoll S.W. Medial collateral ligament strain with partial posteromedial olecranon resection. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2424–2430. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Byram I.R., Kim H.M., Levine W.N., Ahmad C.S. Elbow arthroscopic surgery update for sports medicine conditions. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2191–2202. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Andrews J.R., Timmerman L.A. Outcome of elbow surgery in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:407–413. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reddy A.S., Kvitne R.S., Yocum L.A., Elattrache N.S., Glousman R.E., Jobe F.W. Arthroscopy of the elbow: A long-term clinical review. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:588–594. doi: 10.1053/jars.2000.8953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andrews J.R., Carson W.G. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy. 1985;1:97–107. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(85)80038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.