Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Work Health Care. 2018 Feb 6;57(4):267–283. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2018.1437104

Factors associated with the use of social workers for assistance with lifetime and 12-month behavioral health disorders

Amanda Toler Woodward a, Robert Joseph Taylor b
PMCID: PMC6074041  NIHMSID: NIHMS982353  PMID: 29405882

Abstract

This study examined the use of social workers for assistance with a behavioral health disorder. Data were from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys. The analytic sample included respondents who reported using professional services for assistance with a behavioral health disorder during their lifetime (n=5,585). Logistic regression was used to examine the use of a social worker during the respondent’s lifetime or the 12 months prior to the interview. Ten percent of respondents visited a social worker for help with a behavioral health disorder during their lifetime and three percent did so in the 12 months prior to the interview. Women were less likely than men to report using a social worker. Those who visited a social worker tended to also use other professionals for a behavioral health disorder although overall respondents reported visiting social workers less frequently for this reason than other types of professionals.

Keywords: social work, mental health, service utilization


Social workers are a critical component of the behavioral health service delivery system and one of the largest groups of behavioral health service providers (Heisler & Bagalman, 2015; Robiner, 2006) delivering a variety of psychological and substance abuse services to individuals, families and groups. Despite this, extremely little is known about the prevalence with which Americans seek assistance from social workers for behavioral health disorders and the degree to which individuals receive help from social workers in place of or in addition to other service providers. The majority of studies on the utilization of behavioral health services have combined social workers with other providers in categories such as human service providers (Druss et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2005) or non-psychiatrists (e.g. counselors, social workers seen in mental health settings) (Neighbors et al., 2007). Few studies have explicitly investigated the use of social workers for behavioral health disorders. In fact, a search of the research literature found more studies about the use of clergy and primary care physicians for behavioral health issues than about the use of social workers (e.g., Bohnert et al., 2010; Chatters et al., 2017; Olfson, Kroenke, Wang, & Blanco, 2014; Taylor, Ellison, Chatters, Levin, & Lincoln, 2000).

A recent SAMHSA report to Congress (Hyde, 2013), suggested that future changes to behavioral health care include the integration of behavioral health and primary care, a greater focus on the use of evidence-based practices, and a more person-centered and recovery-oriented approach to care. All of these fit well with the social work skill set which emphasizes the ability to navigate across multiple systems and levels of care, evidence-based approaches to care, and beginning “where the client is”. In addition, the move toward provision of behavioral health care within the context of community health centers has been found to increase the delivery of both mental health and substance abuse treatment by a range of behavioral health specialists including social workers (Wells, Morrissey, Lee, & Radford, 2010).

Understanding the characteristics of those who use social workers for behavioral health issues can help inform policies and programs moving forward. This is especially important as existing research has found that only a small percentage of those who seek help for a behavioral health problem visit or state a preference for a social worker (Cheng & Robinson, 2013; Hardy, 2014), suggesting that social workers may be underutilized.

Use of behavioral health services

Less than half of those with a behavioral health problem have been found to seek professional help (Neighbors et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2005; Woodward, 2011). This has increased over time from about 20% in the 1990s to 33% in the early 2000s with the greatest increase seen in the use of the general medical sector (Kessler, Chiu, Demler, & Walters, 2005), particularly a reliance on family physicians (Garrido, Kane, Kaas, & Kane, 2011; Han, Gfroerer, Colpe, Barker, & Colliver, 2011; Neighbors et al., 2007, 2008; Wang et al., 2005; Woodward, 2013). Most of this has been attributed to the increased use of medications, specifically antidepressants (Kessler, Demler, et al., 2005; Marcus & Olfson, 2010; M. Olfson et al., 2002) while the proportion of people receiving outpatient psychotherapy has actually declined (Marcus & Olfson, 2010; M. Olfson et al., 2002).

The use of behavioral health services has been found to vary in consistent ways across sociodemographic and disorder-related indicators. In general, those who are younger, female, unmarried, white, and more highly educated have been found to be more likely to seek help for a behavioral health problem and more likely to visit professionals who specialize in mental health or substance abuse treatment instead of, or in conjunction with, their primary care physician (Neighbors et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2005; Woodward, 2013). Those with a substance disorder have been found to be more likely to use mental health specialty services than those with a mood or anxiety disorder (Wang et al., 2005; Woodward, 2013).

Use of social workers for a behavioral health problem

Among population based studies to date, social workers as a source of help for behavioral health problems have most often been included within broader categories of mental health specialists (which includes social workers seen in a mental health setting) or human services providers (which includes social workers seen in non-mental health settings) (Dezetter et al., 2011; Druss et al., 2007; Neighbors et al., 2007; Olfson et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2005). One study that examined different types of providers separately found that overall the use of social workers was low, they were most likely to be visited when they were one of multiple professionals seen for assistance, and they were more likely to be used by those with numerous comorbid behavioral health problems (Woodward, 2013). Overall, a higher proportion of respondents have been found to report visiting mental health professionals than human services professionals (Druss et al., 2007; Neighbors et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2005).

This limited use of social workers may be in part because people do not recognize social work as an option for helping them with a behavioral health problem. In a 2004 nationally representative telephone survey, respondents viewed social work positively overall, but believed them to be less effective in treating behavioral health problems than psychologists or psychiatrists and most appropriate in roles related to child protection (LeCroy & Stinson, 2004). Numerous studies have found social workers to be the professional least likely to be visited for a behavioral health problem (Condie, Hanson, Lang, Moss, & Kane, 1978; Fall, Levitov, Jennings, & Eberts, 2000; Hardy, 2014; Williams, Simon, & Bell, 2015) and in two studies of African Americans, religious leaders were preferred (Hardy, 2014; Williams et al., 2015). It might also have been the case that individuals received help from a social worker for a behavioral health problem, but within the context of a broader health issue or stressful life event (Gadalla, 2007; Price, 2010; Simning et al., 2010; Taylor, Neighbors, & Broman, 1989).

Despite public perception, social workers are estimated to be the most plentiful provider in the behavioral health system (Heisler & Bagalman, 2015). Social workers have been found to provide behavioral health services in a variety of organizations including managed behavioral health care (Reif, Torres, Horgan, & Merrick, 2012), substance abuse treatment (Smith, Whitaker, & Weismiller, 2006), private practice (Smith et al., 2006), and social service agencies (Smith et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 1989). In a survey of members of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), 71% reported doing work related to substance abuse and treatment including screening and referring clients for treatment; diagnosing or assessing substance disorders; and providing treatment to those with a primary, secondary, or co-occurring substance disorder (Smith et al., 2006). Recent projections from the Bureau of Labor Statistics have estimated that the number of mental health and substance abuse social workers will increase by almost 19% by 2024 (Salsberg et al., 2017).

A basic, generalizable description of who uses social workers for a behavioral health problem is missing from current literature. One recent study that explicitly compared the use of a social worker to the use of other providers found that the association of type of behavioral health disorder, race, education, and marital status with service use was similar for those who used social workers and those who used other providers. Age and gender, however, were significantly associated with the use of other providers, but not the use of social workers (Cheng & Robinson, 2013).

The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the use of social workers for lifetime and 12 month behavioral health disorders. It used data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) to examine the association of sociodemographic and disorder-related variables with the use of social workers for a behavioral health disorder and the degree to which individuals sought assistance from both social workers and other behavioral health service providers.

Methods

Sample

This study used secondary analysis of data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES). Data were collected from 2001 to 2003 from three nationally representative surveys – the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), the National Survey of American Life (NSAL), and the National Latino and Asian American Survey (NLAAS). The NCS-R was representative of the U.S. population and included face-to-face interviews with 9,292 residents of English-speaking households who were 18 years or older. The NSAL was representative of blacks in the United States, and the survey was based on a national probability sample of 6,082 African Americans, blacks of Caribbean descent, and non-Hispanic whites. The NLAAS was a nationally representative sample of Latino and Asian populations in the United States, and the survey included 2,554 Latinos and 2,095 Asian Americans. The CPES surveys shared a common set of objectives and instrumentation and were designed so that they can be combined as though they were a single, nationally representative study (Heeringa & Berglund, 2007).

The analytic sample for this study included respondents who reported using professional services for assistance with a behavioral health disorder at any point during their lifetime (N=5,585). The sample included 2,611 non-Hispanic Whites, 1,377 African Americans, 885 Latinos, 283 Asians, and 314 black Caribbeans. Sixty-one percent of the sample was female. The mean age was 39.76 (SD=13.75) and ranged from 18 to 89. After complete description of the study to participants, informed consent was obtained. All three CPES studies were approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board.

Measures

Respondents were given a list of professionals and asked to indicate which ones they had seen in their lifetime “for problems with your emotions, nerves, or your use of alcohol or drugs.” For each professional, they were then asked when they last saw that professional. These items were used to create a dichotomous indicator of visits to a social worker as well as eight other types of professionals (psychiatrist; general practitioner, family doctor, or other medical doctor; psychologist; counselor; other mental health professional; nurse, occupational therapist, or other health professional; religious or spiritual advisor; any other healer) during the respondents’ lifetime and in the 12 months prior to the interview.

Sociodemographic characteristics included race/ethnicity (White, African American, black Caribbean, Latino, Asian), gender, age (18 to 29, 37 to 64, 65 and older), marital status (currently married, previously married, never married), years of education (0 to 11, 12, 13 to 15, or 16 or more), household income in quartiles ($0 to $16,999, $17,000 to $37,044, $37,045 to $66,999, and $67,000 and higher), region (Northeast, Midwest, South, or West) and insurance coverage (public vs private). Only one person who visited a social worker did not have insurance and was therefore dropped from the analyses.

Behavioral health disorders were assessed with the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview, a structured, lay-administered diagnostic interview based on the definitions and criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-IV (Kessler & Üstün, 2004). On the basis of this assessment, dichotomous measures were created to indicate whether respondents met criteria for any lifetime or 12-month anxiety disorder (panic, agoraphobia, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder), mood disorder (major depression, dysthymia, bi-polar), or substance disorder (alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence, drug abuse, drug dependence).

Analysis

All analyses were performed with the survey commands in Stata 12.0 (StataCorp, 2011), which accounted for the complex multistage clustered design of the CPES samples. All percentages reported were weighted and frequencies were unweighted. Both unadjusted and adjusted percentages were presented. Adjusted percentages were based on adjusted probabilities from logistic regression and design-corrected Wald tests were presented for testing hypotheses about group differences. Adjusted percentages controlled for age and gender in all analyses. Statistical significance in all analyses was based on 2-sided tests with an alpha of .05. Individually significant odds ratios were discussed only if the multivariate logistic regression model in which they were estimated was significant. This approach minimizes the Type 1 error problem of false positives due to multiple comparisons while also avoiding the Type 2 error problem of not being able to detect true associations of moderate magnitude that is introduced by more conservative methods such as Bonferroni corrections” (Nock et al., 2013, p. 302; Perneger, 1998; p. 11).

Results

Of the 5,585 respondents who visited some sort of professional service provider for a behavioral health disorder, 10.8% (n=665) visited a social worker during their lifetime and 2.9% (n=166) visited a social worker in the 12 months before the interview. The demographic description of respondents is in Table 1.

Table 1:

Demographic description of respondents who reported ever visiting a social worker (n=665)

Lifetime (n=665) 12-month (n=166)
n % n %
Age
 18–29 269 36.9 62 41.1
 37–64 367 59.6 98 55.3
 65 and older 29 5.6 6 3.6
Sex
 Female 422 55.7 108 53.5
 Male 243 44.3 58 46.6
Race/ethnicity
 White 310 81.7 81 83.3
 African American 167 9.6 34 6.6
 Black Caribbean 41 0.6 10 0.3
 Latino 107 6.9 33 8.3
 Asian 24 1.3 6 1.5
Education
 0–11 139 14.8 46 18.8
 12 186 30.2 16 30.9
 13–15 183 26.1 39 25.6
 16 or more 157 29 35 24.7
Marital status
 Currently married 299 46.8 64 33.4
 Previously married 153 22.7 47 29.8
 Never married 213 30.5 55 36.7
Household income
 $0 to $16,999 204 21.7 65 28.1
 $17,000 to $37,044 147 20.2 39 18.6
 $37,045 to $66,999 141 25.2 30 31.8
 $67,000 and higher 173 32.9 32 24.5
Region
 Northeast 197 26.9 46 19.7
 Midwest 162 25.7 36 21.1
 South 177 23.3 44 29.8
 West 129 24.1 40 29.3
Insurance
 Public 185 22.5 75 68.9
 Private 360 77.5 67 31.1
Location saw social worker
 Private office 53 31.2
 Social service agency 41 21.8
 Psychiatric outpatient 33 17.5
 Substance abuse outpatient 11 8.9
 Emergency room 16 7
 Church 8 5
 Drop-in center 8 4.3
 Other 38 17.7

There were no significant differences in visits to a social worker by race/ethnicity or gender (Table 2). In terms of behavioral health disorders (Table 3), controlling for age and gender a higher proportion of those who visited a social worker at some point during their lifetime met criteria for all of the lifetime disorders that were assessed, with the exception of alcohol abuse, compared to those who did not visit a social worker. Among those who reported visiting a social worker in the 12 months prior to the interview, only agoraphobia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and drug abuse were significant. For most disorders there was little difference between the unadjusted percentages and those adjusted for age and gender. The one exception was drug abuse for which the adjusted percentages were lower.

Table 2:

Use of social worker by race and gender (n=5,585)a

Lifetime use of social workers (n=655) 12 month use of social workers (n=166)
n % Adjusted %b F p n % Adjusted %b F p
Race/ethnicity 1.22 .304 .50 .735
 White (n=2,611) (ref) 310 10.6 10.7 81 8.4 8.0
 African American (n=1,377) 167 12.3 11.9 34 7.4 7.1
 Black Caribbean (n=314) 41 13.9 12.6 10 4.8 4.4
 Latino (n=885) 107 10.4 9.3 33 10.0 9.1
 Asian (n=283) 24 8.9 8.1 6 8.7 8.4
 Total (N=5,470) 649 10.7 164 8.5
Gender 3.11 .080 3.65 .058
 Male (n=1,931) (ref) 243 12.2 11.9 58 11.1 10.5
 Female (n=3,654) 422 9.9 10.1 108 7.2 7.0
 Total (N=5,585) 665 10.8 166 8.6
Race/ethnicity by gender 1.94 .051 .89 .549
 White male (n=969) 127 12.1 12.0 35 11.3 10.7
 White female (n=1,642) (ref) 183 9.6 9.9 46 6.7 6.5
 African American male (n=405) 63 15.5 15.1 12 8.9 8.5
 African American female (n=972) 104 10.6 10.2 22 6.6 6.4
 Black Caribbean male (n=106) 14 16.1 15.0 3 3.6 3.4
 Black Caribbean female (n=208) 27 11.3 10.1 7 6.1 5.3
 Latino male (n=302) 26 8.2 7.1 6 8.1 7.2
 Latino female (n=583) 81 11.9 11.0 27 11.1 10.3
 Asian male (n=112) 8 9.5 8.7 1 8.5 8.6
 Asian female (n=171) 16 8.5 7.7 5 8.8 8.3
 Total (N=5,470) 649 10.7 164 8.4
a

Unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages are presented.

b

Percentages adjusted for age.

Table 3.

Use of social worker by DSM-IV disorders (n=5,585)a

Lifetime service use (n=5,585) 12 month service use (n=1,893)
Visited social worker (n=665) Did not visit social worker (n=4,920) Visited social worker (n=166) Did not visit social worker (n=1,727)
n % Adjusted %b n % Adjusted %b F P n % Adjusted %b n % Adjusted %b F p
Disordersc
 Panic disorder 107 14.5 14.6 515 8.8 8.8 11.3 .001 26 12.7 13.3 181 9.7 9.7 1.2 .279
 Agoraphobia 72 10.0 10.2 260 3.8 3.8 23.8 <.001 19 11.4 11.4 93 3.7 3.7 11.0 .001
 Social phobia 196 29.3 28.5 973 18.2 18.3 11.6 <.001 39 23.1 21.7 316 15.9 15.6 2.1 .150
 GAD 87 13.7 14.2 530 9.9 9.9 5.7 .018 10 6.7 6.8 140 7.6 7.7 .14 .711
 PTSD 168 24.1 24.0 722 12.0 12.0 26.2 <.001 43 22.7 23.5 198 11.1 10.8 11.5 <.001
 MDD 252 37.6 37.4 1583 29.2 29.2 7.3 .008 46 30.2 29.7 449 23.7 23.1 2.4 .128
 Dysthymia 59 7.3 7.6 264 5.1 5.1 4.6 .033 16 8.2 8.9 107 5.7 5.7 1.8 .187
 Bipolar I and II 55 9.0 8.3 195 3.3 3.3 30.2 <.001 15 9.2 8.0 85 5.1 5.0 1.5 .218
 Alcohol abuse 87 13.4 12.3 502 10.7 10.8 1.09 .298 6 4.4 3.2 31 2.1 1.9 1.4 .241
 Alcohol dependence 94 16.6 15.2 423 8.5 8.6 13.8 <.001 10 6.2 4.9 56 3.7 3.7 .43 .512
 Drug abuse 130 20.2 17.7 632 12.2 12.4 12.8 <.001 4 7.1 4.5 28 1.4 1.3 4.7 .032
 Drug dependence 81 11.3 9.8 265 5.3 5.4 13.0 <.001 6 2.3 1.6 19 1.1 1.1 .45 .502
a

Unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages presented

b

Percentages adjusted for age and gender.

c

Lifetime disorder for lifetime use of social worker and 12-month disorder for 12-month use of social worker

GAD=Generalized Anxiety Disorder; PTSD=Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; MDD=Major Depressive Disorder

Table 4 presents data on the use of other professionals for assistance with a behavioral health disorder. In general in terms of lifetime visits to a professional, a higher proportion of those who visited a social worker also saw a psychiatrist, a psychologist, a counselor, another mental health professional, a nurse, or a religious or spiritual advisor. Two exceptions were visiting a family or other doctor and visiting a healer. Respondents who reported seeing a social worker in the 12 months prior to the interview also reported seeing another mental health professional, a nurse, or a religious spiritual advisor.

Table 4.

Use of other professionals by use of social worker (n=5,585)a

Lifetime 12 month
Visited social worker (n=665) Did not visit social worker (n=4,920) Visited social worker (n=166) Did not visit social worker (n=1,727)
n % Adjusted %b n % Adjusted %b F p n % Adjusted %b n % Adjusted %b F p
Psychiatrist 379 59.1 60.0 1659 29.9 29.9 105.8 <.001 80 39.7 39.3 518 26.5 26.9 3.6 .060
Psychologist 273 43.9 42.7 1223 27.4 27.5 24.8 <.001 38 20.8 19.1 300 17.3 17.2 .21 .649
Counselor 346 53.6 49.9 1307 29.7 30.1 36.9 <.001 59 37.0 32.5 277 17.1 16.5 18.4 <.001
Other mental health 110 16.5 16.5 232 4.5 4.4 108.0 <.001 26 15.0 14.4 86 4.2 4.2 16.0 <.001
Family or other doctor 289 44.4 48.4 2208 47.5 47.0 .23 .634 77 47.0 52.3. 833 52.1 53.0 .01 .907
Nurse 97 15.6 15.6 154 2.7 2.7 124.9 <.001 20 9.6 10.3 46 2.4 2.5 21.1 <.001
Religious/spiritual advisor 184 30.8 30.5 853 16.1 16.1 32.9 <.001 33 26.8 24.5 326 17.1 16.3 2.93 .089
Healer 37 4.8 4.5 168 3.2 3.3 1.03 .312 10 6.6 6.4 92 5.4 5.2 .18 .673
a

Unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages presented.

b

Percentages adjusted for age and gender.

Finally, regression results (Table 5) show that adults aged 65 and older were less likely to have visited a social worker during their lifetime. Those who had never been married, met diagnostic criteria for agoraphobia, and had 2 or more mental disorders were more likely to visit a social worker during their lifetime for assistance with a behavioral health disorder. In terms of use of a social worker in the 12 months prior to the interview, women were less likely than men to use a social worker while those who met criteria for agoraphobia or posttraumatic stress disorder were more likely to report visiting a social worker.

Table 5:

Logistic regression predicting use of social worker

Lifetime (n=4,196) 12-month (1,375)
Variable OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Race/ethnicity
 White Ref Ref
 African American 1.10 .78 – 1.56 0.98 .39 – 2.45
 Black Caribbean 1.10 .47 – 3.03 0.38 .09 – 1.55
 Latino 0.94 .60 1.47 0.80 .46 – 1.39
 Asian 0.26 .05 – 1.41 n.s.
Sex
 Female 0.78 .57 – 1.07 .56* .32 – .97
 Male Ref Ref
Age††
 18–29 Ref Ref
 37–64 1.01 .79 – 1.29 0.93 .56 – 1.56
 65 and older .31** .14 – .65 0.63 .16 – 2.49
Education
 0–11 Ref Ref
 12 1.07 .69 – 1.65 1.27 .52 – 3.12
 13–15 0.87 .59 – 1.29 0.87 .35 – 2.19
 16 or more 1.26 .80 – 1.96 1.29 .48 – 3.50
Marital status
 Currently married Ref Ref
 Previously married 1.26 .79 – 2.02 1.22 .54 – 2.80
 Never married 1.82** 1.23 – 2.68 2.01 1.04 – 3.89
Household income
 $0 to $16,999 Ref Ref
 $17,000 to $37,044 0.87 .47 – 1.64 0.79 .29 – 2.14
 $37,045 to $66,999 0.76 .46 – 1.25 0.89 .34 – 2.34
 $67,000 and higher 1.14 .69 – 1.90 0.69 .27 – 1.76
Region
 Northeast 1.50 1.07 – 2.12 0.81 .48 – 1.37
 Midwest 1.25 .84 – 1.86 1.00 .28 – 2.01
 South Ref Ref
 West 1.11 .70 – 1.75 0.67 .25 – 1.79
Insurance
 Public 1.28 .80 – 2.07 1.18 .57 – 2.43
 Private Ref Ref
Disorder
 MDD 1.00 .70 – 1.44 1.59 .57 – 2.43
 Panic .96 .64 – 1.42 .61 .24 – 1.53
 Agoraphobia 1.80** 1.19 – 2.72 2.95* 1.23 – 7.12
 Social phobia 1.07 .72 – 1.61 .93 .52 – 1.64
 GAD .88 .63 – 1.22 .75 .23 – 2.40
 PTSD 1.55 .96 – 2.49 3.01** 1.55 – 5.85
 Dysthymia .99 .62 – 1.58 .73 .30 – 1.81
 Bipolar I and II 1.63 .98 – 2.70 .75 .19 – 2.96
 Alcohol abuse/dependence 1.03 .57 – 1.85 .70 .25 – 1.97
 Drug abuse/dependence .94 .52 – 1.68 2.87 .53 – 15.60
Number of disorders
 None Ref Ref
 One 1.83 .92 – 3.67 1.67 .83 – 3.34
 2 or more 2.37** 1.27 – 4.44 1.29 .43 – 3.86
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001

Wald chi-square significant at p<.05 for lifetime

††

Wald chi-square significant at p<.01 for lifetime

Discussion

Despite the substantial number of social workers in the behavioral health workforce, social workers appear to be among the least utilized service providers along with nurses, healers, and other unspecified mental health professionals. Our results are consistent with previous findings in this regard (Cheng & Robinson, 2013; Hardy, 2014) and may be related in part to the fact that, although this and similar studies focus on adults, the majority of social workers provide services to children and adolescents and, among those, many work in schools (Robiner, 2006).

Similarly, our findings could also be associated with a limited understanding of the social work profession and, in particular, social workers’ role in mental health care (LeCroy & Stinson, 2004; Williams et al., 2015). The overwhelming association of social work with child welfare and homeless services, two highly stigmatized populations, may, at worst, increase the perceived stigma associated with the profession as a whole and, at best, limit the public’s perception of social workers as a potential source of behavioral health treatment.

At the same time, the lack of knowledge about social work raises questions about the ability of respondents to accurately identify when they are receiving services from a social worker. This may be especially true in certain settings. In an emergency room, for example, titles such as case manager may apply to social workers or nurses depending on their role and patients may or may not recognize the difference. In social service agencies, similar tasks may be done by social workers, counselors, or other types of professionals.

In general, a higher proportion of those with a lifetime or 12-month disorder saw a social worker for assistance and those who saw a social worker were more likely to have two or more disorders. Furthermore, those who saw a social worker also saw another type of professional. This is consistent with previous research on help-seeking in general (Wang et al., 2005; Woodward, 2013) and the use of social workers in particular (Cheng & Robinson, 2013). Individuals with more severe and complex disorders, such as dual diagnosis of both mental and substance use disorders tend to be more likely to use services. These individuals often have contact with a range of professionals over time including potential contact with multidisciplinary teams. They are also more likely to receive services in hospital and community mental health settings where social workers are involved in behavioral health care. As part of a team, social work plays an important role in addressing the constellation of biopsychosocial issues individuals with complex physical and behavioral health challenges face. Not only can social workers provide counseling, but they can help manage medications and provide case management to link clients to housing, income, and social support services. Social workers working in emergency rooms have been found to save medical providers time (Gordon, 2001) and provide care that is outside the scope of practice of other providers (Moore et al., 2016). There is also some evidence that social workers in primary care settings improved patient outcomes and lowered costs particularly for those patients managing multiple physical and behavioral chronic conditions (McGregor, Mercer, & Harris, 2016).

In addition to number of disorders, type of disorder was associated with visiting a social worker, specifically meeting criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder or agoraphobia. Posttraumatic stress disorder is particularly likely to be comorbid with other disorders (Santucci, 2012) which may contribute to the greater likelihood that these individuals visit a social worker for behavioral health care. The use of social workers for assistance with these disorders, however, may also be related to the nature of social work services. For example, the person-centered strengths-based approach of social work may be particularly suited to working with individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (Joseph, 2004; Rowe, 2017) through the concept of post-traumatic growth which posits that trauma can be a starting point for increased levels of positive functioning (Joseph & Murphy, 2014).

In terms of agoraphobia, social workers regularly do home visits as part of their services unlike most other behavioral health service providers, which may be necessary for those with agoraphobia given their difficulty leaving the house. This ability to provide services in the home increases access to behavioral health services for clients who might not otherwise be able to access it (Dore & Zuffante, 2015).

Although differences in behavioral health service use by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status are well documented (Bogner, de Vries, Maulik, & Unützer, 2009; Neighbors et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2005), we found limited demographic differences associated with the use of a social worker. Interestingly, contrary to most previous research on help-seeking from both professional and informal sources, women in this study were less likely than men to report visiting a social worker. This may be due, in part, to the higher proportion of men in the sample who met criteria for a substance disorder compared to women. Much of the available data on the behavioral health workforce combines data on mental health and substance abuse service (Hyde, 2013) making it difficult to identify the proportion of social workers providing substance abuse treatment specifically and what share of addictions treatment service providers social workers represent. However, a 2006 NASW report found that while just 3% of active licensed social workers reported addictions as their primary practice (compared to 37% in mental health), a higher proportion of masters-level social workers in addictions are men (30%) compared to those who work in mental health (19%) and compared to the social work profession over all (18%) (Whitaker, Weismiller, & Clark, 2006). This may in part reflect gender differences in the client base.

Furthermore, social workers in behavioral health clinics and social service agencies, two of the settings where they are most likely to see clients with addictions, are also more likely to see men (compared to private practice where 74% of social workers report a caseload that is predominantly women) (Whitaker et al., 2006). A third of respondents in the current study saw a social worker in the context of private practice and over sixty percent of those were female which may also contribute to gender differences found in this study. Social workers in private practice overwhelmingly work with individuals (Lord & Iudice, 2012) while in other settings social workers may do more group work which is a common modality for substance abuse treatment in particular.

Conclusion and Limitations

The findings of this study should be considered within the context of several limitations. First, given evidence of the public’s general lack of knowledge about social work, the use of self-report of visits to a social worker is a limitation of this study that may result in underreporting the use of social workers for a behavioral health disorder. Second, only one person in this sample of service users did not have any health insurance and three-quarters had private insurance. This is somewhat different than the U.S. population at the time this data was collected. Given that insurance coverage may influence where respondents reported going for services this may limit the generalizability of our results. Finally, although the CPES remains one of the only nationally representative surveys that provide comprehensive population data on mental health and mental health service use, the data are now over a decade old. There have been changes in behavioral health care and insurance coverage over this time that may make our results less applicable today.

Despite these limitations, this study provides an investigation of individuals’ use of social workers for a behavioral health disorder that is unique in current literature. We found that although social workers are an important aspect of the behavioral health workforce they are utilized by only 1 in 10 of the respondents in this nationally representative sample. The majority of people who saw social workers also sought help from other professionals including psychiatrists, psychologists, clergy, and family doctors. Clearly this is an area where more research is needed. Future research should further examine the quality and outcomes of behavioral health services provided by social workers.

References

  1. Bogner HR, de Vries HF, Maulik PK, & Unützer J (2009). Mental healthsServices use: Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area follow-up. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(8), 706–715. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181aad5c5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohnert ASB, Perron BE, Jarman CN, Vaughn MG, Chatters LM, & Taylor RJ (2010). Use of clergy services among individuals seeking treatment for alcohol use problems. The American Journal on Addictions, 19(4), 345–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00050.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chatters LM, Taylor RJ, Woodward AT, Bohnert ASB, Peterson TL, & Perron BE (2017). Differences between African Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites utilization of clergy for counseling with serious personal problems. Race and Social Problems, 9(2), 139–149. doi: 10.1007/s12552-017-9207-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng TC, & Robinson MA (2013). Factors leading African Americans and Black Caribbeans to use social work services for treating mental and substance use disorders. Health & Social Work, 38(2), 99–109. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlt005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Condie CD, Hanson JA, Lang NE, Moss DK, & Kane RA (1978). How the public views social work. Social Work, 23, 47–53. doi: 10.1093/sw/23.1.47 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dezetter A, Briffault X, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, … Kovess-Masfety V (2011). Factors associated with use of psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrist providers by ESEMeD respondents in six European countries. Psychiatric Services, 62(2), 143–51. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dore MM, & Zuffante C (2015). Social work practice in home based services In Corcoran K & Roberts AR (Eds.), Social Workers’ Desk Reference (3rd ed., pp. 67–75). New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Druss BG, Wang PS, Sampson NA, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, & Kessler RC (2007). Understanding mental health treatment in persons without mental diagnoses: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(10), 1196–1203. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fall KA, Levitov JE, Jennings M, & Eberts S (2000). The public perception of mental health professionals: An empirical examination. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 122–134. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gadalla TM (2007). Cancer patients’ use of social work services in Canada: Prevalence, profile, and predictors of use. Health & Social Work, 32(3), 189–96. doi: 10.1093/hsw/32.3.189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garrido MM, Kane RL, Kaas M, & Kane RA (2011). Use of mental health care by community-dwelling older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(1), 50–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03220.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon JA (2001). Cost-benefit analysis of social work services in the emergency department: a conceptual model. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(1), 54–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00552.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han B, Gfroerer JC, Colpe LJ, Barker PR, & Colliver JD (2011). Serious psychological distress and mental health service use among community-dwelling older U.S. adults. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 291–8. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardy K (2014). Which way did they go? Uncovering the preferred source of help-seeking among African-American Christians. Social Work and Christianity, 41(1), 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Heeringa SG, & Berglund P (2007). National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Survey Program (CPES) Data Set: Integrated Weights and Sampling Error Codes for Design-Based Analysis. Retrieved from www.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/cpes/using.xml?Section=Weighting
  16. Heisler EJ, & Bagalman E (2015). The Mental Health Workforce: A Primer (No. R43255). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Research Service; Retrieved from http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43255.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Hyde P (2013). Report to Congress on the Nation’s Substance Abuse and Mental Health Workforce Issues. US Dept. for Health and Human Serv., Substance Abuse and Mental Health Serv (Jan. 2013), 10. Retrieved from http://www.cimh.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/samhsa_bhwork_0.pdf
  18. Joseph S (2004). Client-centered therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic growth: theoretical perspectives and practical implications. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 77(Pt 1), 101–119. doi: 10.1348/147608304322874281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Joseph S, & Murphy D (2014). Trauma: A unifying concept for social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 44(5), 1094–1109. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, & Walters EE (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617–627. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kessler RC, Demler O, Frank RG, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Walters EE, … Zaslavsky AM (2005). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(24), 2515–2523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa043266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kessler RC, & Üstün TB (2004). The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(2), 93–121. doi: 10.1002/mpr.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. LeCroy CW, & Stinson EL (2004). The public’s perception of social work: Is it what we think it is? Social Work, 49, 164–174. doi: 10.1093/sw/49.2.164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lord SA, & Iudice J (2012). Social workers in private practice: A descriptive study of what they do. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(1), 85–94. doi: 10.1007/s10615-011-0316-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marcus SC, & Olfson M (2010). National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(12), 1265–1273. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGregor J, Mercer SW, & Harris FM (2016). Health benefits of primary care social work for adults with complex health and social needs: a systematic review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(1), 1365–2524. 10.1111/hsc.12337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moore M, Whiteside LK, Dotolo D, Wang J, Ho L, Conley B, … Zatzick DF (2016). The role of social work in providing mental health services and care coordination in an urban trauma center emergency department. Psychiatric Services, 67(12), 1348–1354. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Neighbors HW, Caldwell C, Williams DR, Nesse R, Taylor RJ, Bullard KM, … Jackson JS (2007). Race, ethnicity, and the use of services for mental disorders: Results from the National Survey of American Life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(April), 485–494. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Neighbors HW, Woodward AT, Bullard KM, Ford BC, Taylor RJ, & Jackson JS (2008). Mental health service use among older African Americans: The National Survey of American Life. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 948–956. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187ddd3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, McLaughlin KA, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, & Kessler RC (2013). Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(3), 300–310. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Olfson M, Kroenke K, Wang S, & Blanco C (2014). Trends in office-based mental health care provided by psychiatrists and primary care physicians. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75(3), 247–253. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Olfson M, Marcus S, Druss B, Elinson L, Tanielian T, & Pincus H (2002). National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. Journal of American Medical Association, 287, 203–209. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Perneger TV (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ, 316(7139), 1236–1238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Price SK (2010). Women’s use of multisector mental health services in a community-based perinatal depression program. Social Work Research, 34(3), 145–155. doi: 10.1093/swr/34.3.145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reif S, Torres ME, Horgan CM, & Merrick EL (2012). Characteristics of practitioners in a private managed behavioral health plan. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 283. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Robiner WN (2006). The mental health professions: Workforce supply and demand issues, and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 600–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rowe W (2017). Client-centered theory and the person-centered approach: Values-based, evidence supported In Turner FJ (Ed.), Social Work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Approaches (6th ed., pp. 34–53). New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Salsberg E, Quigley L, Mehfoud N, Acquaviva K, Wyche K, & Sliwa S (2017). Profile of the Social Work Workforce. The George Washington Unversity Health Workforce Instittue and School of Nursing; Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Centers-Initiatives/Initiatives/National-Workforce-Initiative/SW-Workforce-Book-FINAL-11-08-2017.aspx [Google Scholar]
  39. Santucci P (2012). Mental health outcomes of disasters and trauma In Framingham J & Teasley M (Eds.), Behavioral health response to disaster (pp. 115–140). New York: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharpley CF (1986). Public perceptions of four mental health professions: A survey of knowledge and attitudes to psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and counselors. American Psychologist, 21, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  41. Simning A, Richardson TM, Friedman B, Boyle LL, Podgorski C, & Conwell Y (2010). Mental distress and service utilization among help-seeking, community-dwelling older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(5), 739–49. doi: 10.1017/S104161021000058X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith MJW, Whitaker T, & Weismiller T (2006). Social workers in the substance abuse treatment field: A snapshot of service activities. Health & Social Work, 31(2), 109–15. doi: 10.1093/hsw/31.2.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. StataCorp. (2011). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. [Google Scholar]
  44. Taylor RJ, Ellison CG, Chatters LM, Levin JS, & Lincoln KD (2000). Mental health services in faith communities: The role of clergy in Black churches. Social Work, 45(1), 73–86. doi: 10.1093/sw/45.1.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Taylor RJ, Neighbors HW, & Broman CL (1989). Evaluation of Black Americans of the social service encounter during a serious personal problem. Social Work, 34(3), 205–211 10.1093/sw/34.3.205 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, & Kessler RC (2005). Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 629–640. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wells R, Morrissey JP, Lee I-H, & Radford A (2010). Trends in behavioral health care service provision by community health centers, 1998–2007. Psychiatric Services, 61(8), 759–64. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.8.759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Whitaker T, Weismiller T, & Clark E (2006). Assuring the sufficiency of a frontline workforce: A national study of licensed social workers. Executive summary. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers. [Google Scholar]
  49. Williams J, Simon C, & Bell A (2015). Missing the mark: The image of the social work profession in an African-American community. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 24(1), 56–70. doi: 10.1080/15313204.2014.954739 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodward AT (2011). Discrimination and help-seeking: Use of professional services and informal support among African Americans, Black Caribbeans, and non-Hispanic whites with a mental disorder. Race and Social Problems, 3, 146–159. doi: 10.1007/s12552-011-9049-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Woodward AT (2013). A latent class analysis of age differences in choosing service providers to treat mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 64(11), 1087–1094. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES