Skip to main content
Annals of Saudi Medicine logoLink to Annals of Saudi Medicine
. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):440–444. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.440

Rapid identification of nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a surgical intensive care unit in Egypt

Doaa Mohammad Ghaith a,, Reem Mostafa Hassan a, Ahmed Mohamed Hasanin b
PMCID: PMC6074475  PMID: 26657227

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapid and accurate identification of nosocomial clinical isolates is the first essential step in investigating nosocomial outbreaks. We aimed to evaluate the performance of MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter versus matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in rapid detection of nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of Kasr Alainy-Cairo University.

METHODS

Over a period of 9 months from January 2014 until September 2014, 234 samples were collected. All samples were directly cultured on MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter media. MALDI-TOF MS was used to identify all non-lactose fermenting colonies on conventional media. Confirmation of species identification was done by detecting the blaOXA-51 like gene by PCR.

RESULTS

Statistical evaluation of MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter against blaOXA-51 like PCR as the reference method for identification of A baumannii showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.36% to 100%), specificity 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.04% to 99.68%), positive predictive value 96.4% (95%CI: 86.61% to 99.37%), negative predictive value 100% (95% CI: 97.36% to 100%). The statistical evaluation of MALDI-TOF against blaOXA-51 PCR was 100% concordance.

CONCLUSION

MALDI-TOF MS was more specific than CHROMagar in identifying Acinetobacter spp and allowed further identification of non-A Baumannii species such as A hemolyticus and A nosocomialis, which are less common Acinetobacter spp involved in hospital-acquired infections.


Acinetobacter baumannii is an emerging nosocomial pathogen that contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in infected patients, especially in intensive care units.1,2 The rapid and accurate identification of nosocomial clinical isolates is the first essential step in investigating outbreaks for proper and timely intervention in infection control programs.3 The molecular identification of A baumannii has been validated using blaOXA-51-like genes in previous studies. It is a simple and reliable way to detect variants from isolates of A baumannii.4

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been evaluated for identification of Acinetobacter baumannii. 5,6 On the other hand many chromogenic media are commercially available and are commonly used as a cheap and rapid detection method for organisms causing hospital-acquired infections.710

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter versus matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in rapid detection of nosocomial A baumannii isolated from patients admitted in Kasr Alainy-Cairo University-surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

METHODS

Over a period of 9 months from January 2014 until September 2014, 234 different samples were collected from patients who were admitted to surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of Kasr Alainy tertiary hospital (Cairo University).

Identification of clinical isolates by (MALDI-TOF MS)

All samples were cultured on different media; blood, chocolate and MacConkey agars (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, Hamsphire, England). Non-lactose fermenting (NLF) colonies were identified by conventional biochemical testing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the disc diffusion method (Modified Kirby Bauer technique) on Mueller-Hinton agar according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute11 guidelines. Further identification was done by MALDI-TOF MS on a Microflex LT instrument (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) with FlexControl (version 3.0) software (Bruker Daltonics) for the automatic acquisition of mass spectra in the linear positive mode within a range of 2 to 20 kDa, according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For isolate identification, the row spectra were compared with those in the Biotyper 56 database and a log (score) of ≥2 was considered for a secure species identification. Spectra were acquired with a microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics), recorded in the positive linear mode at a laser frequency of 20 Hz, ion source 1 voltage 59 20 kV, ion source 2 voltage 8.5 kV, and a mass range from 2000 to 20 000 KDa, as described elsewhere.12 For MALDI-TOF MS, bacteria were cultured for 24h at 37°C on MacConkey agar and extracts were prepared as described previously.12,13

Identification of clinical isolates by MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter Media

All samples were directly inoculated on the MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter Media (CHROMagar, France) according to the manufactures recommendations. MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter is used to detect different types of mulitidrug resistant (MDR) organisms.

Identification of clinical isolates by blaOXA-51 like gene

Molecular analysis by conventional PCR was done using the blaOXA-51 -like gene as described by Turton et al, 2006. DNA was extracted by the heating method of Vaneechoutte; briefly, strains were grown on blood agar plates and were incubated overnight at 37°C to isolate single colonies. After incubation, four or five discrete colonies of each strain were resuspended in 50 μL of sterile distilled water in a 0.5-mL Eppendorf tube. To lyse the cells and extract DNA, the tubes were heated for 10 min at 95°C, then cooled on ice, and were centrifuged in a microcentrifuge (Microfuge Lite; Beckman) at 12 000 rpm for 30 sec to remove the cell debris. These crude DNA extracts were kept on ice for immediate use or frozen at −20°C until the rest of the PCR reagents were prepared.14,15

DNA amplification was performed in 25-μL reaction volumes with 3 μL of extracted DNA, 12.5 pmol of each primer (OXA-51-likeF 5′-TAA TGC TTT GAT CGG CCT TG-3′, OXA-51-likeR 5′-TGG ATT GCA CTT CAT CTT GG-3′) (Bioneer, AccuOligo), and 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase in 1 μl PCR buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl2 (QIAGEN, inc., Chatsworth, CA, USA) and 200 μM of each dTPs. Conditions of the thermal cycler (Primus 25 advanced-PEQ LAB – Gmbh-V1106E Germany) for PCR was the following: 94°C for 3 min, and then 35 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 57°C for 45 s, and 60°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.8

The amplified products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose (BIORAD), stained with ethidium bromide and examined by UV (utraviolet) transillumination (Sigma). Positive blaOXA-51 like fragment was 369 bp.

RESULTS

From all 234 samples inoculated on the MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter, 59 isolates grew on the media, 56/234 isolates showed the typical morphology of MDR Acinetobacter spp appearing as red colonies, while 3 samples revealed different colored colonies; two isolates showed black colonies (further identified as Proteus spp.) and one isolate showed green colonies (further identified as K pneumoniae). (Figures 1, 2 and 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CHROMagar MDR Acinetobacter agar plate showing typical red colonies of MDR Acinetobacter spp.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CHROMagar MDR Acinetobacter agar plate showing MDR Proteus mirabilis with black-colored colonies.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CHROMagar MDR Acinetobacter agar plate showing MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae with green-colored colonies.

Molecular identification of the 56 MDR Acinetobacter spp recovered from MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter was done by blaOXA-51 like PCR, which was positive in 54/56 (96.4%) of MDR Acinetobacter spp. isolates, identifying them as Acinetobacter baumannii (Figure 4). Using MALDI TOF MS, the 56 isolates were identified as Acinetobacter species with a score value >2.7, 54 identified as Acinetobacter baumannii, one as Acinetobacter haemolyticus and another one as Acinetobacter nosocomialis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Lane (1) is negative for blaOXA51, Lanes (2), (3), (4) and (5) are OXA51 positive while Lane (6) is the ladder lane.

Statistical evaluation of MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter against blaOXA-51 like PCR as the reference method for identification of Acinetobacter baumannii, showed a sensitivity 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.36% to 100%), specificity 98.8% (95%CI: 96.04% to 99.68%), positive predictive value 96.4% (95% CI: 86.61% to 99.37%), negative predictive value 100% (95% CI: 97.36% to 100%). The statistical evaluation of MALDI TOF against blaOXA-51 like gene PCR showed 100% concordance.

DISCUSSION

In our study, we evaluated the performance of MDR CHROMagar Acinetobacter against reference methods for early and accurate identification of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. We found that it was 96.4% sensitive and 100% specific for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii when compared to blaOXA-51 like PCR as the reference method for identification of Acinetobacter baumannii. Acinetobacter spp appeared as bright salmon red colonies, while the other MDR gram-negative bacteria appeared in different colors. Limitations of CHROMagar are as follows: some Enterobacteriaceae strains may grow as blue to metallic blue colonies and in the presence of the MDR selective supplement these strains should be considered as potentially harboring multi-drug resistance.

Other non-fermenter gram-negative strains such as Pseudomonas spp or Stenotrophomonas spp can have an appearance similar to Acinetobacter and are frequently MDR, and can grow in the presence of the MDR-selective supplement. Fortunately, Pseudomonas strains can be easily differentiated by an oxidase test, while Stenotrophomonas strains can be distinguished as forming tiny colonies at 18–24 hours as stated in the CHROMagar manufacturer insert.

Wareham et al 2011 also reported that S maltophilia grew on CHROMagar Acinetobacter and had a red color similar to A baumannii, making it difficult to distinguish.15

However, MDR CHROMagar Acinetobacter may save time in the absence of a red color, indicating the absence of MDR Acinetobacter species in patient samples by screening, leading to improvement in infection control strategies and stopping the use of empirical antibiotics in screen negative patients.

Various studies have found results similar to ours such as Ajao et al 2011, who found that CHROMagar Acinetobacter was 100% sensitive for Acinetobacter isolates compared to MacConkey agar, which was 89% sensitive for Acinetobacter species and 91% sensitive for MDR-A baumannii. Helal et al found that MDR Acinetobacter CHROMagar was 92.9% sensitive and 100% specific for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii.16,17

In another study that evaluated the use of MDR-CHROMagar Acinetobacter for detection of MDR Acinetobacter species in nasal and rectal surveillance cultures, there was a 100% concordance between CHROMagar Acinetobacter and Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux) in terms of identification; they had the same results in antimicrobial susceptibility using E-test strips (bioMerieux, Marcy-I’Etoile, France).18

The ubiquitous nature of blaOXA-51 -like genes in A baumannii has led to this gene becoming an important genetic marker in identification of the organism to the species level. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the optimal tool for the identification of OXA-type carbapenemases, though carries the disadvantages of higher cost and the requirement for trained personal.19

Molecular identification of the 56 MDR Acinetobacter isolates recovered from MDR CHROMagar Acinetobacter was done by PCR for detection of oxa-51 like gene, which was positive in 96.4% (54/56) MDR Acinetobacter, identifying these 54 cases as A baumannii, with only 2 cases of MDR non-baumannii spp.

A study performed by Gordon and Wareham reported that CHROMagar Acinetobacter was both sensitive (91.7%) and specific (89.7%) for MDR-A baumannii when compared to PCR. Investigators in Korea reported that all their isolates (28/28) identified as A baumannii were blaOXA-51 -like positive.20,21 While the cost of CHROMagar Acinetobacter was less than the cost of the molecular method, it had a comparable outcome, detecting all MDR isolates (Acinetobacter spp, and others) with no missed cases.

Many studies have reported having confidence in MALDI-TOF MS for different microorganisms. Most of these studies included strains from reference and culture collections. The application of MALDI-TOF MS in routine microbiology laboratories in many countries is now expanding as it has the advantage of identification of microorganisms in minutes versus conventional biochemical testing that takes 24 hours or even more.19,21

For A baumannii, the manufacturer of Brucker MALDI-TOF MS has reported that species of the genus Acinetobacter have very similar patterns; therefore, distinguishing species is difficult. However, confident results can be obtained with duplicate identification of each isolate while relying on a more stringent spectra score of >2.3 (“highly probable species identification”) instead of >2 (“secure genus identification, probable species identification”) as stated by the Brucker MALDI Biotyper software.

A baumannii is the most clinically important species in hospital settings that we could detect in our study using oxa-51 like PCR. MALDI Biotyper system allowed further identification of non-Baumannii species as A hemolyticus and A nosocomialis, which are less common Acinetobacter species involved in hospital-acquired infections. The obstacle with the MALDI Biotyper is the initial cost of the system, but the cost per test for isolate identification is low compared to conventional biochemical tests and PCR analysis. However, in epidemiological settings, the use of MDR CHROMagar Acinetobacter will be more cost and labor effective, as there will be a quick answer for the presence or absence of infection with an MDR organism. Also, there will be no need for performing separate antimicrobial susceptibility testing that must follow identification using MALDI Biotyper or PCR.

In conclusion, the MDR CHROMagar Acinetobacter is a cost and labor effective method for detection of MDR Acinetobacter spp in hospital settings that can be used with confidence (94.6%) when compared to oxa-51-like PCR, the gold standard for A baumannii identification, and the MALDI-TOF system. The results suggest that MALDI-TOF MS can be used for real-time detection of Acinetobacter outbreaks, before results from DNA-based systems are available.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding source

No funding resources.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hasanin A, Eladawy A, Mohamed H, Salah Y, Lotfy A, Mostafa H, et al. Prevalence of extensively drug-resistant gram negative bacilli in surgical intensive care in Egypt. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:177. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.177.4307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Munoz-Price LS, Weinstein RA. Acinetobacter infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(suppl 12):1271–1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee K, Yong D, Seok Jeong H, et al. Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter spp.: Increasingly Problematic Nosocomial Pathogens. Yonsei Med J. 2011;52(suppl 6):879–891. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.6.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Turton JF, Woodford N, Glover J, Yarde S, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the blaOXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2974–2976. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01021-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Treviño M, Areses P, Peñalver MD, Cortizo S, Pardo F, del Molino ML, et al. Susceptibility trends of Bacteroides fragilis group and characterization of carbapenemase-producing strains by automated REP -PCR and MALDI TOF. Anaerobe. 2012;18:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Treviño M, Navarro D, Barbeito G, García-Riestra C, Crespo C, Regueiro BJ. Molecular and epidemiological analysis of nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella. spp. using repetitive extragenic palindromic-polymerase chain reaction and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight. Microb Drug Resist. 2011;17:433–442. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2010.0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang HY, Suh JT, Lee HJ. Evaluation of commercial selective agars in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010;40(suppl 3):252–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stamper PD, Shulder S, Bekalo P, Manandhar D, Ross TL, Speser S, et al. Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar VanRE for detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in rectal swab specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;48(suppl 11):4294–4297. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01522-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saito R, Koyano S, Nagai R, Okamura N, Moriya K, Koike K. Evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for the detection of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51(suppl 6):704–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2010.02945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Panagea T, Galani I, Souli M, Adamou P, Antoniadou A, Giamarellou H. Evaluation of CHRO-Magar KPC for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in rectal surveillance cultures. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;37(suppl 2):124–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-third Informational Supplement M100-S23. 1. Vol. 33. CLSI; Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mellmann A, Cloud J, Maier T, Keckevoet U, Ramminger I, Iwen P, et al. Evaluation of matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification of nonfermenting bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1946–1954. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00157-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spanu T, De Carolis E, Fiori B, et al. Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to rpoB gene sequencing for species identification of bloodstream infection staphylococcal isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:44–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vaneechoutte M, Dijkshoorn L, Tjernberg I, et al. Identification of Acinetobacter genomic species by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:11–15. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.11-15.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wareham DW, Gordon NC. Modifications to CHROMagar Acinetobacter for improved selective growth of multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;47(suppl 7):2249–2251. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.083469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ajao AO, Robinson G, Lee MS, et al. Comparison of culture media for detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in surveillance cultures of critically-ill patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:1425–30. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1237-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Helal S, El Anany M, Ghaith D, Rabeea S. The Role of MDR-Acinetobacter baumannii in Orthopedic Surgical Site Infections Surgical Infections. October. 2015;16(5):518–522. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song W, Lee J, Kim T-K, Park M-J, Kim H-S, Kim J-S. Modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter Medium for Direct Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Strains in Nasal and Rectal Swab Samples. Ann Lab Med. 2013;33:193–195. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.3.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kempf M, Bakour S, Flaudrops C, et al. Rapid Detection of Carbapenem Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. PLoS One. 2012;7(suppl 2):e31676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gordon NC, Wareham DW. Evaluation of CHROMagar Acinetobacter for detection of enteric carriage of multi drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in samples from critically ill patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(suppl 7):2249–2251. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00634-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wieser A, Schneider L, Jung J, Schubert S. MALDI-TOF MS in microbiological diagnostics identification of microorganisms and beyond. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:965–974. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3783-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Saudi Medicine are provided here courtesy of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

RESOURCES