Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2018 Jul 13;97(28):e11232. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011232

Association of MCP-1 rs1024611 polymorphism with diabetic foot ulcers

Na Su a,∗, Nairui Zhao a, Guangya Wang a, Linxia Wang a, Yunna Zhang a, Ruijie Li a, Ying Liu b, Xinxin Yang a, Cuiliu Li a, Mingming Hou c
Editor: Liang-Jun Yan
PMCID: PMC6076038  PMID: 29995756

Abstract

Monocyte chemotactant protein-1 (MCP-1), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, plays an important role in inflammatory process. In present study, we evaluated the association of MCP-1 gene rs1024611 polymorphism with risk and clinical characteristics of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

This study recruited 116 patients with DFUs, 135 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) without complications (non-DFU), and 149 healthy controls (HCs). MCP-1 gene rs1024611 polymorphism was genotyped by direct sequencing. The expression of MCP-1 was analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assume the association strength.

Individuals with rs1024611 AG and GG genotypes exhibited significantly higher susceptibility to DFUs, in the comparison with HCs (AG vs AA, OR = 2.364, 95% CI = 1.021–5.470; GG vs AA, OR = 2.686, 95% CI = 1.154–6.255). Meanwhile, G allele was associated with increased DFUs susceptibility (OR = 1.457, 95% CI = 1.014–2.093). Besides, rs1024611 SNP was slightly correlated with increased DFUs susceptibility in patients with DM. GG genotype of rs1024611 was significantly correlated with higher epidermal thickness and lower dermis thickness in patients with DFUs (P < .01). Patients with DFU exhibited upregulation of MCP-1 mRNA, and GG genotype was correlated with enhanced MCP-1 expression in DFU and non-DFU groups.

Rs1024611 polymorphism was significantly associated with MCP-1 expression and individual susceptibility to DFUs.

Keywords: clinical feature, diabetic foot ulcers, MCP-1 gene, polymorphism

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a type of metabolic diseases, which is characterized by high blood sugar levels. DM can be divided into type I and type II DM (T1DM and T2DM). Without timely treatment, DM can cause many complications. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is one of the serious long term complications.[1] DFUs usually caused by the vascular lesions, nervous lesion, and infection in the lower limbs of patients with DM.[2] DFU could influence nerve, blood vessel, skin, tendon, and even bone. With the increasing of DM incidence, the morbidity of DFUs exhibits increasing trend.[3] Treatment of DFUs is difficult and costly. DFUs can cause swingeing pain, even amputation that brings heavy burden for family and society.[4,5] In addition, the long-term inflammatory phase in DM wound will cause the dysfunction of macrophage and cytokine, delay of granulation tissue formation, and the reduction of wound tensile strength.[6–8] Despite unclear pathogenesis of DFUs, it is generally considered that hereditary factor, especially the genes related to inflammatory responses, play an important role in the development of DFUs.[9–12]

Monocyte chemotactant protein-1 (MCP-1), also known as C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, belongs to CC chemokine family and participates in immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes. MCP-1 could regulate vasculature inflammation in the wound site.[13] The expression of MCP-1 protein was significantly upregulated in diabetic rats.[14] Van Asten and colleagues suggested that the MCP-1 expression level was increased in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis.[15] Serum concentration of MCP-1 was strongly correlated with DFUs.[16] However, the genetic association of MCP-1 gene with DFUs still remained unclear.

In present study, we analyzed the association of MCP-1 gene rs1024611 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with DFUs susceptibility in a Chinese Han population. Meanwhile, the influences of rs1024611 SNP for DFUs clinical features were also detected.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study subjects

Approval was afforded by ethnic committee of Cangzhou Central Hospital. Written informed consent was signed by each patient. Process of the study was accorded with the declaration of Helsinki. Questionnaire was used to collect the basic information of the participants. All of the patients were Chinese Han population. Clinical features were confirmed and recorded by professionally trained nurses (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Basic features for participants.

2.1.

Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Clinical features for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

2.1.

Open in a new tab

Patients with T2DM with DFUs were diagnosed by 2 pathologists in Cangzhou Central Hospital. The diagnosis of T2DM was performed according to the previous criteria[17] and checked by recent criteria.[18] Patients with DM without DFUs but with other complications were excluded from this study. Then patients with T2DM without any complications were randomly selected as the non-DFU group. Healthy individuals were randomly selected from the healthy checkup center of the same hospital, severing as healthy control (HC) group. Frequencies of age and gender were matched among these groups. Participants had no history of other clinical system diseases. HCs had no evidences for any inflammatory diseases or systemic diseases.

2.2. Genotyping method

After a 12-hour fasting, 5 mL peripheral blood was collected from elbow venous of each patient in the morning. Blood samples were used for genomic DNA extraction via DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The amplification of rs1024611 SNP[19] was accorded with the previous study using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Finally, PCR products were sequenced by ABI 3730XL analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

2.3. RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA samples were isolated from the blood samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the instruction of manufacturer. The concentration and purity of RNA were measured via NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). PrimeScript first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara, Beijing, China) was utilized to synthesize the first strand of cDNA. The relative expression of MCP-1 mRNA in the collected blood samples were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) method which was performed by SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara). The primer sequences were designed by Primer Premier 5.0 software as follows: MCP-1: 5′-CTCGCCTCCAGCATGAAAGT-3′ and 5′-GGTGACTGGGGCATTGATTG-3′; GAPDH: 5′-TCCTACCCCCAATGTATCCG-3′ and 5′-CCTTTAGTGGGCCCTCGG-3′. GAPDH served as internal control. The relative expression of MCP-1 was calculated using 2-ΔΔCt method. Each test was performed 3 times.

2.4. Statistic analysis

The representativeness of study patients was evaluated by Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test via PLINK. Quantitative variables were presented by mean ± standard deviation, and analyzed using t test or Mann–Whitney U test. Qualitative variables were assessed by Chi-squared test. Association strength between MCP-1 polymorphism and DFUs susceptibility was estimated using Chi-squared test, and the results were assumed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All the statistical analyses were performed by PASW18.0. All the analyses were 2-tailed, and the results with P < .05 were considered significant. The significant level for multiple test was adjusted by Bonferroni method.

3. Results

3.1. Basic and clinical features

Age and gender had no significant difference among DFU, non-DFU, and HC groups (Table 1, P > .05). Except high-density lipoprotein concentration, other features were significantly different among these groups (Table 1, P < .05). Clinical features for patients with DFUs were shown in Table 2. Epidermal thickness and dermis thickness for patients with DFUs were 1.87 ± 0.11 and 1.44 ± 0.07 mm, respectively. Among these patients, 64 were neuropathic DFU, 39 were neuroischemic DFU, 2 were ischemic DFU, and 11 were non-neuropathic, nonischemic DFU. The site of ulcer included forefoot (87), midfoot (16), and hindfoot (13).

3.2. Association of MCP-1 polymorphism with DFUs susceptibility

Genotype distribution of rs1024611 SNP did not depart from the HWE test respectively in DFU, non-DFU, and HC groups (Table 3, P > .05), revealing the well goodness of the patients.

Table 3.

Association of MCP-1 rs1024611 polymorphism with DFU susceptibility.

3.2.

Open in a new tab

Compared with the HCs, rs1024611 AG and GG genotypes were significantly associated with the increased susceptibility of DFUs (Table 3, AG vs AA, P = .041, OR = 2.364, 95% CI = 1.021–5.470; GG vs AA, P = .019, OR = 2.686, 95% CI = 1.154–6.255). Similar result was observed between G allele and DFUs susceptibility (P = .041, OR = 1.457, 95% CI = 1.014–2.093). Variant allele carriers of rs1024611 SNP had higher frequencies in non-DFU group than that in HC group, but the difference was not significant (Table 3, P > .05). Meanwhile, higher frequencies of AG and GG genotypes were discovered in DFU group, compared with non-DFU group. But the difference was insight (Table 3, P > .05). Thus, we suggested that rs1024611 SNP was slightly associated with increased DFUs susceptibility in patients with DM.

3.3. Influence of rs1024611 SNP for DFU clinical features

We analyzed the differences of DFUs’ basic and clinical features according to their genotypes of rs1024611 polymorphism. We failed to find any significant results between the basic features and rs1024611 genotypes (P > .05, data not shown). Meanwhile, rs1024611 genotypes had no significant influence on the type and site of ulcer (Table 4, P > .05). The epidermal thickness of the individuals carrying AA, AG, and GG genotypes were 1.80 ± 0.08, 1.93 ± 0.09 and 1.95 ± 0.10 mm, respectively. The epidermal thickness of GG genotype carriers was significantly higher than that of AA and AG carriers (Table 4, P < .01). In AA, AG, and GG genotype carriers, the dermis thicknesses were 1.50 ± 0.04, 1.45 ± 0.08, and 1.42 ± 0.05 mm, respectively. GG genotype carriers had significantly lower dermis thickness, compared with other 2 genotypes (Table 4, P < .01). Therefore, we considered that rs1024611 GG genotype was significantly associated with the epidermal and dermis thickness in patients with DFUs.

Table 4.

Influence of rs1024611 single-nucleotide polymorphism for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) clinical features.

3.3.

Open in a new tab

3.4. The expression of MCP-1 mRNA in the study population

In the present study, qRT-PCR was performed to investigate the expression profiles of MCP-1 mRNA in DFU, non-DFU, and HC groups. Compared with HC group, the relative expression of MCP-1 mRNA was significantly increased in non-DFU group (P = .008) and DFU group (P < .001). Moreover, patients with DFU exhibited obviously higher levels of MCP-1 than the individuals in non-DFU group (P = .010) (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The expression profiles of monocyte chemotactant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA in the study population. (A) The relative expression of MCP-1 in healthy control (HC), non-diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), and DFU groups. Compared with HC group, the expression of MCP-1 was significantly higher in DFU and non-DFU groups. Moreover, the cases in DFU group showed significantly increased levels of MCP-1. (B) The expression patterns of MCP-1 mRNA in HC group according to their genotypes of rs1024611 genotype. The individuals carrying different genotypes of rs1024611 SNP did not show significant differences in MCP-1 expression. (C) The comparison of MCP-1 expression in non-DFU group according to their genotypes of rs1024611 polymorphism. Compared to AA genotype carriers, the individuals with AG genotype exhibited higher levels of MCP-1 mRNA. (D) The expression profile of MCP-1 mRNA in DFU group. The levels of MCP-1 mRNA were significantly different between DFU cases carrying AA and AG genotypes. ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001.

3.5. Effects of rs1024611 SNP on expression of MCP-1

In addition, we compared the expression of MCP-1 in the study groups according to genotypes of rs1024611 SNP. In HC group, the individuals who carried different genotypes of rs1024611 polymorphism did not exhibit different expression patterns of MCP-1 (P > .05 for all) (Fig. 1B). In non-DFU group, the cases carrying GG genotype showed significantly increased levels of MCP-1 than those carrying AA genotype (P = .020). However, the levels of MCP-1 were similar between AG and AA carriers in non-DFU group (P = .404) (Fig. 1C). In DFU group, we found that patients carrying GG genotype exhibited obviously higher levels of MCP-1 than those carrying AA genotype (P = .004). The individuals carrying AG genotype did not show differences in MCP-1 expression with AA genotype carriers (P = .134) (Fig. 1D).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the genetic association of MCP-1 rs1024611 polymorphism with DFU susceptibility in a Chinese Han population. We found that the individuals carrying AG and GG genotypes were more likely to develop DFU. Furthermore, GG genotype was significantly associated with the epidermal and dermis thickness in patients with DFUs. Compared with HC group, DFU and non-DFU groups had high levels of MCP-1. GG genotype was significantly associated with increased levels of MCP-1 mRNA. All the data revealed the important role of MCP-1 polymorphism in etiology of DFUs.

The DFUs could develop from both T1DM and T2DM. It is attributed by the abnormal inflammatory responses which caused by wound healing or other conditions. Immune cells and cytokines are important components in inflammatory responses. MCP-1 holds the capacity to modulate monocyte chemotaxis, activate endothelial cell, and regulate inflammatory progression and pro-inflammatory cytokines production. In DM, the patients with high levels of MCP-1 were more likely to develop diabetic complications, such as diabetic nephropathy.[20,21] Furthermore, the upregulation of MCP-1 in patients with DM may lead to abnormal leukocyte infiltration in ulcerative tissue.[16] In human, MCP-1 gene is located at 17q12 and contains 3 exons. Accumulating evidences have demonstrated that the polymorphisms in MCP-1 gene may influence genetic predisposition to the complications of DM.[20–22] Rs1024611 is a frequently studied polymorphism in promote region of MCP-1 gene, which has been reported to be involved in various immune and inflammatory diseases.[23–25] He and colleagues found that G allele of rs1024611 SNP was associated with enhanced MCP-1 expression.[26] Consequently, we speculated that rs1024611 SNP might be involved in the development of DFUs.

In the present study, AG genotype of rs1024611 SNP predicted 2.364 times increased susceptibility for DFUs in HCs, but had no significant association with the increased DFUs susceptibility in patients with DM. About 2.686 times enhanced susceptibility of DFUs was brought by rs1024611 GG genotype in the healthy individuals. Rs1024611 G allele was significantly associated with elevated susceptibility of DFUs approximately 1.457 times in total patients. A recent meta-analysis study indicated that rs1024611 SNP was positively associated with the increased susceptibility to diabetic retinopathy in patients with T2DM.[22] Besides, rs1024611 SNP was distinctly associated with the end-stage renal disease in patients with T2DM.[27]

Basic features, ulcer type and site had no significant differences in the 3 different genotypes of rs1024611 SNP in patients with DFUs. GG genotype was distinctly related to increased epidermal thickness and reduced dermis thickness in patients with DFUs. In addition, we analyzed the expression patterns of MCP-1 mRNA in HC, non-DFU, and DFU groups. The results demonstrated that compared with HC group, the patients with DM with or without DFU exhibited increased levels of MCP-1. Moreover, patients with DFU had significantly higher levels of MCP-1 than the DM cases without DFU. The conclusion was consistent with the previous report.[16] We also compared the expression of MCP-1 in the study population according to their genotypes of rs1024611 polymorphism. Analysis results suggested that both in DFU and non-DFU groups, the individuals carrying GG genotype exhibited obviously increased MCP-1 expression. GG genotype might enhance the expression of MCP-1. The conclusion was in line with the study of He et al.[26] Rs1024611 polymorphism is located at promoter region -2518 site of MCP-1 gene, an important regulatory region for MCP-1 transfection. Genetic mutations in this region might alter transfection of MCP-1 gene, and the gene function, thus leading to abnormalities in a series of inflammatory cascade response, and inflammatory-related diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of MCP-1 in DFU had not been explored in our study. Further investigations will be required.

Based on above results, we suggested that rs1024611 SNP might promote the onset and development of DFUs via regulate the gene transfection. The individuals carrying GG genotype of rs1024611 SNP were more likely to have high expression of MCP-1, and develop DFU. Some limitations in the current study should be stated. First of all, due to the short term of study period, the sample size was not large enough to provide a high statistical power. Secondly, patients were recruited from a single hospital that might limit the applicable scope of the present results. Thirdly, association strength was not adjusted by confounding factors that might affect the stability of current result. Therefore, well-designed studies with enlarged sample size are necessary in the future.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Na Su, Nairui Zhao.

Data curation: Na Su, Nairui Zhao.

Formal analysis: Na Su, Nairui Zhao.

Funding acquisition: Na Su, Nairui Zhao.

Investigation: Guangya Wang, Linxia Wang.

Methodology: Guangya Wang, Linxia Wang.

Project administration: Guangya Wang, Linxia Wang.

Resources: Guangya Wang, Linxia Wang, Yunna Zhang, Ruijie Li.

Software: Yunna Zhang, Ruijie Li.

Supervision: Yunna Zhang, Ruijie Li, Ying Liu, Xinxin Yang.

Validation: Yunna Zhang, Ruijie Li, Ying Liu, Xinxin Yang, Cuiliu Li, Mingming Hou.

Visualization: Ying Liu, Xinxin Yang, Cuiliu Li, Mingming Hou.

Writing – original draft: Ying Liu, Xinxin Yang, Cuiliu Li, Mingming Hou.

Writing – review & editing: Ying Liu, Xinxin Yang, Cuiliu Li, Mingming Hou.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CIs = confidence intervals, DFU = diabetic foot ulcer, DM = diabetes mellitus, HC = healthy control, HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, MCP-1 = monocyte chemotactant protein-1, ORs = odds ratios, QRT-PCR = quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism, T1DM = type I diabetes mellitus, T2DM = type II diabetes mellitus.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Volmer-Thole M, Lobmann R. Neuropathy and diabetic foot syndrome. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17: pii: E917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Marti-Carvajal AJ, Gluud C, Nicola S, et al. Growth factors for treating diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;CD008548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Noor S, Zubair M, Ahmad J. Diabetic foot ulcer - a review on pathophysiology, classification and microbial etiology. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2015;9:192–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Dunyach-Remy C, Ngba Essebe C, Sotto A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and diabetic foot ulcers: role in pathogenesis and interest in diagnosis. Toxins (Basel) 2016;8.: pii: E209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Yazdanpanah L, Nasiri M, Adarvishi S. Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer. World J Diabetes 2015;6:37–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kanter JE, Kramer F, Barnhart S, et al. Diabetes promotes an inflammatory macrophage phenotype and atherosclerosis through acyl-CoA synthetase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:E715–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Akturk O, Kismet K, Yasti AC, et al. Collagen/gold nanoparticle nanocomposites: a potential skin wound healing biomaterial. J Biomater Appl 2016;31:283–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lodhi S, Jain AP, Rai G, et al. Preliminary investigation for wound healing and anti-inflammatory effects of Bambusa vulgaris leaves in rats. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2016;7:14–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Jhamb S, Vangaveti VN, Malabu UH. Genetic and molecular basis of diabetic foot ulcers: clinical review. J Tissue Viability 2016;25:229–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Catrina SB, Zheng X. Disturbed hypoxic responses as a pathogenic mechanism of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016;32(Suppl 1):179–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Giatsidis G, Dalla Venezia E, Bassetto F. The role of gene therapy in regenerative surgery: updated insights. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:1425–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bruhn-Olszewska B, Korzon-Burakowska A, Gabig-Ciminska M, et al. Molecular factors involved in the development of diabetic foot syndrome. Acta Biochim Pol 2012;59:507–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Kasiewicz LN, Whitehead KA. Silencing TNFalpha with lipidoid nanoparticles downregulates both TNFalpha and MCP-1 in an in vitro co-culture model of diabetic foot ulcers. Acta Biomater 2016;32:120–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Setti G, Hayward A, Dessapt C, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone prevents albuminuria but not glomerulosclerosis in experimental diabetes. Am J Nephrol 2010;32:393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Van Asten SA, Nichols A, La Fontaine J, et al. The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Int Wound J 2017;14:40–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Afarideh M, Ghanbari P, Noshad S, et al. Raised serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in patients with active diabetic foot ulcers. Br J Nutr 2016;115:1938–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S33–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2011. Diabetes care 2011;34(Suppl 1):S11–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Shi GL, Yang L, Sun Y, et al. MCP-1 gene polymorphisms in North Chinese patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Genet Mol Res 2015;14:4035–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Nazir N, Siddiqui K, Al-Qasim S, et al. Meta-analysis of diabetic nephropathy associated genetic variants in inflammation and angiogenesis involved in different biochemical pathways. BMC Med Genet 2014;15:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Guan R, Purohit S, Wang H, et al. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) in sera of patients with type 1 diabetes and diabetic complications. PLoS One 2011;6:e17822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Wang W, He M, Huang W. Association of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene 2518A/G polymorphism with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;120:40–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Li YW, Yang CQ, Xiao YL, et al. The -A2518G polymorphism in the MCP-1 gene and inflammatory bowel disease risk: a meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2015;16:177–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Martin ES, Schneeberger EE, Aranda FM, et al. The -2518 A/G polymorphism in the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 gene (MCP-1) is associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis in Argentine patients. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:3057–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Lee YH, Bae SC. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 promoter -2518 polymorphism and susceptibility to vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2016;62:65–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].He J, Chen Y, Lin Y, et al. Association study of MCP-1 promoter polymorphisms with the susceptibility and progression of sepsis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Raina P, Matharoo K, Bhanwer AJ. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) g.-2518A > G polymorphism and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the North-West Indian population of Punjab. Ann Hum Biol 2015;42:276–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES