Table 2:
Significant main and interaction effects of multiple comparisons for EFRs in ΝΛΜ using rmANOVA are summarized in the table. F and p values for each effect are reported in parentheses.
| Sig. main effect (F value. p value) | Sig. interaction effects (F value. p value) | |
|---|---|---|
| 256 Hz SAM 100 % depth processing in HP NAM | ||
| A vs. Y matched vave I | Age (8.28,< 0.05) | Age*SNR (6.72, <0.05) |
| SNR (136.85,< 0.0001) | ||
| A vs. Y matched EFR | Age (25.03,< 0.05) | Age*SNR (15.20, <0.0001) |
| SNR (157.44,< 0.0001) | ||
| 256 Hz SAM 50 % depth processing in HP NAM | ||
| A vs. Y matched wave I | Age (6.08, < 0.05) | Age*SNR (8.27, <0.0001) |
| SNR (138.01, < 0.0001) | ||
| A vs. Y matched EFR | Age (24.17, < 0.05) | Age*SNR (17.60, <0.0001) |
| SNR (184.95, < 0.0001) | ||
| 71 Hz NAM processing in 256 Hz SAM 100 % depth | ||
| A vs. Y matched wave I | Age (26.94,< 0.05) | Age*SNR (5.65,< 0.0001) |
| SNR (38.69. 0.0001) | ||
| A vs. Y matched EFR | Age (25.88,< 0.05) | Age*SNR (3.39,< 0.05) |
| SNR (49.25, <0.0001) | ||
| 71 Hz NAM processing in 256 Hz SAM 50 % depth | ||
| Age. Y matched wave I | Age (24.34. 0.05) | Age*SNR (3.92, <0.05) |
| SNR (35.7, <0.0001) | ||
| Age. Y matched EFR | Age (30.13. 0.0001) | Age*SNR (2.96, <0.05) |
| SNR (40.55, <0.0001) | ||