Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2017 Aug 18;5(4):10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0055-2016. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0055-2016

Fungal Genomes and Insights into the Evolution of the Kingdom

Jason E Stajich 1
Editors: Joseph Heitman2, Eva Holtgrewe Stukenbrock3
PMCID: PMC6078396  NIHMSID: NIHMS982782  PMID: 28820125

ABSTRACT

The kingdom Fungi comprises species that inhabit nearly all ecosystems. Fungi exist as both free-living and symbiotic unicellular and multicellular organisms with diverse morphologies. The genomes of fungi encode genes that enable them to thrive in diverse environments, invade plant and animal cells, and participate in nutrient cycling in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The continuously expanding databases of fungal genome sequences have been generated by individual and large-scale efforts such as Génolevures, Broad Institute’s Fungal Genome Initiative, and the 1000 Fungal Genomes Project (http://1000.fungalgenomes.org). These efforts have produced a catalog of fungal genes and genomic organization. The genomic datasets can be utilized to better understand how fungi have adapted to their lifestyles and ecological niches. Large datasets of fungal genomic and transcriptomic data have enabled the use of novel methodologies and improved the study of fungal evolution from a molecular sequence perspective. Combined with microscopes, petri dishes, and woodland forays, genome sequencing supports bioinformatics and comparative genomics approaches as important tools in the study of the biology and evolution of fungi.

EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS OF FUNGI

Studies of fungal evolution require an understanding of the phylogenetic relationships and relative evolutionary divergence of organisms. The first approaches to organizing fungi into related groups relied on morphological characteristics (1). These approaches provided a broad framework to organize fungal organisms for taxonomic classification based on recognizable morphological characteristics such as spore shape, asexual and sexual structures, and in mushroom-forming fungi, the shape and presence/absence of gills, veil attachments, and spore color. In zoosporic chytrid fungi the characteristics seen by scanning electron microscopy of zoospores reveal that the ultrastructure of the kinetosomes and flagellum are all diagnostic for the classification of many lineages (2). However, the microscopic nature of many fungi and especially of yeast-forming fungi with limited visible differences, and the prevalence of convergent evolution to homoplasies or similar characteristics across a tree, has made taxonomic classification of groups of fungi difficult or easily misled. The invention and application of DNA sequencing (3) and PCR (4) and the development of primers to amplify fungal rRNA enabled a new era of molecular phylogenetic studies in fungi (5). These approaches provided invaluable information that was used to resolve the major fungal lineages (2, 620) and the delineation of species (2124). Using DNA approaches to study the entire fungal tree of life provided new insight into the order of branching of major groups and the timing of morphological changes such as the loss of the flagellum found in zoosporic fungi (14, 17, 18, 25).

With improved resolution of the phylogeny of fungal species, the timing of the emergence and changes in species traits and lifestyles can be compared, such as the evolution of host-associated symbioses and pathogenic interactions with plants or animals. Analysis of the evolution of morphological complexity along a phylogeny can establish the approximate time when complex growth emerged, such as fruiting bodies and multicellular structures, or simplified to establish transitions when unicellular yeast morphology emerged (26). Changes in subcellular characteristics such as septate hyphae, polarized hyphal growth, and the presence or absence of a flagellated life stage can be mapped on the tree to study the order and timing of their emergence relative to other structures or host-associated lifestyles (27, 28). With the availability of genome sequence data, the history of these phenotypic changes can be mapped onto the phylogeny and compared to the evolution of individual genes or the presence or absence of a gene family or be correlated with changes in evolutionary rates of gene sequences (29). These changes may reflect gains, but losses can also drive morphological changes such as simplification (26). The data and approaches are only recently becoming available to support robust analyses to link genes to phenotypes. Some examples of successful applications of the approaches include the acquisition of enzymes needed for anaerobic growth by Saccharomyces (3032), gains of subtilase genes related to animal-associated lifestyles (3335), genome reduction correlated to a yeast growth form (36, 37), and changes in structure of centrioles for microtubule attachments (38).

As technology advanced to support inexpensive high-throughput genome sequencing, improved phylogenetic software and high-performance computing have further improved the resolution of the phylogenetic relationships of fungi (Fig. 1). Fungi were some of the first eukaryotes to benefit from these technological advancements to support the application of phylogenomic methods. Phylogenomics uses multiple orthologous genes, each sampled from a species genome to construct a composite phylogenetic tree from a concatenated dataset or individual gene trees (36, 3943). A large collection of orthologous loci mined from genome or transcriptome sequences enables phylogenomic studies and tests for conflicting phylogenetic signals. These conflicts may be caused by genomic loci with different evolutionary histories due to, for example, incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, or different selective pressures (40, 4448). Identification of gene tree and species tree conflicts can help to generate the best representation of the species tree and reveal current or historical selective pressures on genetic loci.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Phylogenetic relationships of the fungal phyla and subphyla. A phylogenetic tree from 434 conserved protein-coding genes resolves the relationships of most of the known lineages of fungi. This tree is a simplified version of that presented by Spatafora et al. (43). Phyla are presented in bold and subphyla in regular type. The Chytridiomycetes and Monoblepharidomycetes represent lineages for which a subphylum is not yet named.

IMPACTS OF ECOLOGICAL NICHE ADAPTATION ON FUNGAL GENOME EVOLUTION

Genome sequencing has enabled comparisons of gene content and sequence changes to begin to predict the likely molecular basis for traits and adaptations. As heterotrophic organisms, fungi obtain carbon and nitrogen from external sources. A variety of cooperative and parasitic associations of fungi with other organisms are found throughout the fungal kingdom. Saprotrophic fungi liberate nutrients by degrading organic matter in habitats ranging from soils, dead insects and plants, compost piles, animal dung, and water-damaged homes. Ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form mutualistic partnerships with plants and trade plant-produced carbon in the form of sugars in exchange for inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and other minerals. Fungi can live as commensal associates of plants and animals, for example, as plant endophytes or asymptomatic skin fungi, but also can cause devastating diseases in animals and plants via multiple invasive strategies. Some pathogenic fungi produce toxin molecules or effector proteins to kill host cells or disable host defenses, while others are opportunistic pathogens that only cause disease when the host becomes sick or immunocompromised.

Ectomycorrhizal fungi have mutualistic lifestyles with plants that involve trading resources. Plant pathogens secrete enzymes to break down cell walls. These enzymes can induce a plant defense response (49, 50). Fungi engaged in mutualistic fungal-plant symbioses typically have a reduction in genes encoding enzymes for plant cell wall degradation to avoid eliciting a plant defense response (51). Instead, effectors including small secreted proteins are typically expressed in the ectomycorrhizal fungal-plant interface to establish and promote the two-way partnership (5153). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi also are important plant symbionts contributing to plant health. The molecular components of the interaction and roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-produced effectors are still emerging areas of research (54, 55).

Historical biotic and abiotic interactions have shaped the evolution of genes and the genome organization of fungi. Through the comparison of fungal genomes, the impact of natural selection and neutral processes has been assessed to indicate genes and genomic regions of importance in the evolution of species. For example, wood-degrading fungi are classified as brown or white rot fungi depending on their ability to degrade recalcitrant lignin polymers. The woody material in trees and bushes is made up of cellulose and lignin, the latter providing strength to plants. Lignin is highly recalcitrant to degradation, and when linked to hemicellulose and cellulose it can be inaccessible to ligninolytic enzymes. To access the lignin, white rot fungi secrete a combination of enzymes and organic acids to break down and later absorb carbohydrate degradation products of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin (56). Comparative analysis of the genomes of brown and white rotters found that metabolic and enzymatic gene families varied. The presence of specific families in the brown or white rot species was consistent with their classification and the chemical reactions these fungi can induce to break down woody material (42, 5760). However, additional analyses have identified that some species of white rot fungi have unexpectedly missing genes that would typically predict that they were unable to degrade lignin (61). Exploration of the genomes of two white rot fungi indicated that despite similar lignin degradation capabilities, the species contained different enzyme classes, and this suggests that additional pathways of delignification exist and remain to be discovered (62).

Fungi can exist in extreme environments such as the anaerobic rumen stomachs of ruminants (63, 64), the dry Atacama Desert in Chile (65, 66), and hypersaline salterns with NaCl concentrations up to 30% (67) and as endolithic inhabitants of rocks in Antarctica (68, 69). Thermophilic fungi that grow in the desert can survive at temperatures above 60°C (70, 71). Studies of these thermophiles and their genome sequences have led to the development of new enzymes for biotechnology and cell biology studies due to their thermostability (7274). Molecular adaptations that have allowed these fungi to colonize these extreme niches are still being uncovered, and genomic sequencing and comparisons among relatives of extremophiles should provide candidate genes that impact these abilities.

EVOLUTION OF GENOME SIZE

Genome sizes of fungi can vary by almost 3 orders of magnitude. A sampling of 325 phylogenetically diverse fungi has shown that genome sizes vary from 2 Mb in Microsporidia to 2 gigabases (Gb) in Pucciniales fungi, with a median of 35 Mb (https://github.com/1KFG/genome_stats/; Fig. 2). This vast range is the result of multiple genome reduction and expansion events. The total number of predicted protein-coding genes in these fungi varies by an order of magnitude, ranging from 1,800 genes in Encephalitozoon (Microsporidia) to 35,000 genes in Sphaerobolus (Agaricomyoctina), with a median gene count of 11,000. Some of the smallest and most compact genomes can be found in the obligate parasites Microsporidia, with sizes in the 2 to 6 Mb range (7578). The free-living yeasts in the Ascomycota and the Cryptomycota parasite Rozella typically have genomes in the 7 to 12 Mb range (7983), and the Basidiomycota Cryptococcus yeasts are around 20 Mb (8385). Lineages containing yeast-forming species tend to have smaller genomes (such as Schizosaccharomyces and Ashyba), but this apparent reduction has occurred independently and multiple times in fungal history (36, 37, 86).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Scatter plot showing the relationship between genome size and gene count. Genome size varies among subphyla of fungi, with some of the smallest genomes in the Microsporidia and the largest currently sequenced genomes in the Agaricomycotina and Pezizomycotina. Primary data are gathered from genome information available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Joint Genome Institute Mycocosm (https://jgi.doe.gov/fungi) and archived in the 1KFG genome_stats github project (https://github.com/1KFG/genome_stats).

At the upper end of the range of currently sequenced species are the 150- to 175-Mb genomes of Cenococcum geophilum (Dothidiomycetes; Ascomycota), Sphaerobolus stellatus (Agaricomyoctina; Basidiomycota), Tuber melanosporum (Pezizales; Ascomycota), and Blumeria graminis (Leotiomycetes; Ascomycota) (51, 8789), which are primarily plant-associated fungi with both biotrophic and mutualistic lifestyles. Genome expansions in these species appear to have been driven mostly by transposon element content expansion. The total gene count is also higher in these genomes, which may belie an increase in gene duplication or insertion events that accompany the evolutionary processes that enabled increased transposon copy number.

Genomes of Entomophthoromycotina (Zoopagomycota) also are extremely large. The genome of Entomophaga aulicae is estimated to be as large as 8 Gb based on estimates using nuclear staining approaches (90), though sequencing has not yet been attempted. The genomes of the insect-killing zygomycete fungi Entomophthora muscae and Zoophthora radicans (Entomophthoromycotina; Zoopagomycota) appear to be in the ∼700 Mb to 1.5 Gb range based on sequencing done through the Joint Genome Institute for the 1000 Genomes Project and others (M.B. Eisen and H. de Fine Licht, personal communication). The large genome size appears to be driven by increases in transposable elements, while gene count is not substantially expanded based on RNA-seq of these and related species (91, 92). Genome size estimation using flow cytometry has indicated that many of the rust fungi (Pucciniales; Pucciniomycotina) also have large genomes with estimated sizes of 300 to 900 Mb (93).

Genome reduction has also occurred in several fungal lineages, with the highly reduced genomes of the obligate parasitic microsporidian fungi being some of the most prominent examples, with tiny genomes (by fungal standards) in the 2 to 6 Mb range (7578). However, not all Microsporidia have tiny genomes; some are in the 16 to 20 Mb range, which seems to be due to transposon insertions in the few cases that have been examined (94). A smaller genome lends itself to fewer genes; as such, Microsporidia have a highly reduced gene set, dispensing with most small-molecule production and energy production pathways in favor of uptake transporters to obtain these resources from hosts (78, 9597). In addition to fewer genes, the lengths of gene sequences themselves are reduced because the selective pressures that resulted in reduced genome size also contributed to reduced gene length (76, 95, 98). Coding space is at such a premium, with genes found nearly every 1,000 bp in some species (75), that some transcribed genes overlap (98, 99). Other obligate parasites in the fungal kingdom such as Pneumocystis demonstrate reduced genomes in the 8 Mb range, with approximately 3,700 genes (100102), suggesting the presence of common selective pressures to reduce genome size as part of a tight host association in some parasitic fungal-host interactions.

Reduced genomes are a hallmark of yeast-forming lineages. Prominent examples include the Saccharomycotina yeast Ashbya gossypii, with a 9-Mb genome and 5,300 genes, and the Taphrinomycotina fungus Schizosaccharomyces pombe, also known as fission yeast, with a 12-Mb genome and 5,100 genes (80, 86, 103). The fern pathogen Mixia osmundae (Pucciniomycotina; Basidiomycota) has a 14-Mb genome (82) and 7,000 genes, and the human pathogenic Cryptococcus yeasts (Tremellomycetes; Basidiomycota) (8385) have 19-Mb genomes with around 7,000 protein-coding genes. In each of these clades of yeast-forming fungi the genome sizes tend to be smaller than their filamentous sister clades. The filamentous Pezizomycotina fungi, sister to the Saccharomycetales yeasts, have genomes in the 35 to 45 Mb range, and the Agaricomycotina fungi sisters to the Pucciniomycotina are typically in the 45 to 60 Mb range. Analyses of gene gain and loss in yeast lineages have revealed that major gene losses occurred in the evolutionary history of these lineages, indicating genome reduction in the transition to single-celled growth (36, 37, 86).

Efforts to study how changes in gene content and evolution affect different lineages have identified classes of genes and genomic regions that change at different rates (104, 105). Within a genome, gene family copy number dynamics, transposable element transposition frequency, and individual gene evolution vary across a genome, which could be a consequence of different selective pressures but which also influenced random genetic drift. An important driver in the importance of random genetic drift versus selection in shaping a genome is the effective population size of a species. An organism’s mode of dispersal, outcrossing frequency, and rapidity of cell division can all influence the effective population size, though the driving factors that determine effective population size are not well explored in fungi. Some of these regions, such as effectors and defense genes, can be important pathogenic or symbiosis-associated genes. The processes that establish and maintain different rates of change are likely not universal, but genome regions with extremely high rates of molecular evolution are particularly common in plants, fungi, and oomycete species (106111) and may be important sources for novelty within species.

Many of the studies of genome size change are limited to lineages that diverged many millions of years ago. This divergence does not allow for the study of the mechanisms of genome size changes occurring at the population level. While aneuploidy and polyploidy manipulation and large-scale acquisition of DNA have been explored in Saccharomyces (112115), studies of recent changes in genome size by massive gene duplications or transposon proliferation could reveal fitness consequences and the relative role of neutral versus directional selection in the success of lineages with genome size expansions (116, 117). Increased genome size may also result from changes in effective population sizes leading to relaxed selection and genome size increase (116). What might drive changes in population sizes? A newly acquired plant-associated lifestyle may impose constraints on reproductive modes (e.g., timing and availability of partners) or dispersal (e.g., how spores are produced). A better understanding of the pressures that drive genome size change could help us to understand how demography and transposable element proliferation influence fungal evolution, and in some cases how they have enabled the emergence of many disease-causing plant pathogens.

Gene and Gene Family Size Dynamics

Sampling entire genomes has allowed for increased resolution regarding the relationships between fungal lineages as well as the history of individual genes. Reconstruction of individual trees for each gene in the genome can provide a means to establish the age and coalescent history of a gene; e.g., a gene could originate with the Eukaryotes, in the Animal-Fungi ancestor, or be fungal-specific. Tools such as PhylomeDB and Ensembl Genomes Compara provide interfaces to explore these reconstructions to understand the history of a single gene (118, 119). Other events that generate copy number expansions of a gene or gene family through duplication can be identified, and the timing of these duplication events can be established when comparing the copy number of the same gene family across a phylogeny of species with sequenced genomes. Likewise, a comparison of gene family contractions and gene losses can be studied to identify when potential function or diversity was lost. These changes in genome content provide important insights into adaptations that organisms may experience due to shifts in ecological niches or associations with a plant or animal host.

Gene family expansions

Comparisons of gene families between species have revealed several instances of gene copy number expansions possibly driven by evolutionary adaptations; such expansions have been instrumental in the evolution of pathogenicity traits. Copy number expansions of fungal genes containing the carbohydrate-binding LysM motif have been documented in both animal and plant pathogens (120123). LysM protein motifs bind chitin or chitin-like carbohydrates and peptidoglycans (120, 124), and their role in fungi may be to bind the chitin in fungal cell walls to avoid triggering recognition by the plant or animal host defenses (125). The expanded copy number of these genes and the domain may be a signature of species that have biotrophic interactions with a host, and recent expansions could indicate a recent shift to this association from a saprotrophic lifestyle. The genomes of the human pathogenic fungi and basidiomycete yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii show expansions of sugar and major facilitator superfamily genes (83, 84) hypothesized to play a role in increased uptake of these molecules from the environment (126) and could be important in synthesis and transport of the prominent capsule that is composed of the polysaccharides glucuronoxylomannan and glucuronoxylo-mannogalactan (127129).

Expansion of the subtilase and metalloprotease gene families has also been noted as important in the transition to an animal pathogenic lifestyle in the filamentous ascomycetes Onygenales (33, 35, 130). The M36 metalloprotease family has expanded in Coccidioides fungi and their close relatives and is hypothesized to be linked to the switch from plant- to animal-associated ecologies and the switch from obtaining nutrients from plant-based carbohydrates to animal keratin and proteins (33, 34, 131). Research in animal-associated dermatophyte fungi has revealed similar, but typically independent, expansions of proteases in Blastomyces (132), Trichophytoni, and Microsporum (123). Interestingly, the human pathogen Sporothrix, not an Onygenales fungi but a member of a different clade (Ophiostomataceae; Sordariomycete), does not show signatures of recent protease family expansion, suggesting a different transition to mammalian association.

Comparison of the genes in the amphibian disease-causing chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis to a nonpathogenic relative also identified expansions within protease families (133). The copy number of aspartyl and multiple metalloprotease gene families and the chitin-binding domain CBM18 are dramatically expanded in the pathogen as compared to nonpathogenic sister species (133). The importance of these expansions in pathogenesis is suggested by several investigations. One study found that a subtilisin-like serine protease was upregulated in response to amphibian host expression of thyroid hormone necessary for amphibian development (134). The CBM18 gene has the highest copy number of any fungus, ranging from 65 to 90 copies among sequenced strains, and has been under recent positive selection, indicating that it may be an important contributor to its pathogenicity (135, 136). Cloning and expression of the domain demonstrated that it also is capable of binding chitin (137). Comparison with the closest relative, Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans, also a successful and recently emerging pathogen, supports a hypothesis that the timing of these protease and CBM18 gene family expansions coincides with the emergence of the two Batrachochytrium lineages (136).

Plant pathogenic fungi have also undergone gene copy number expansion, effectively enabling host colonization and the ability to overcome plant defenses. One example is secreted effector proteins, which are expanded and diversifying in rust genomes (Pucciniomycotina; Basidiomycota) (138). Recent transposable element expansion, which is associated with gene duplications and accelerated rates of effector gene evolution, is noted in Leptosphaeria maculans (Pleosporales; Dothideomycetes) (106, 110). Other members of the L. maculans species complex have small genomes and lack this genome expansion. The powdery mildew B. graminis has a large genome with an expansion of atypical avirulence genes and signal peptide-containing genes (89). Metalloproteases and alpha amylases are expanded in the important plant disease-causing fungus Zymoseptoria tritici (formerly Mycosphaerella graminicola) (Capnodiales; Dothideomycetes). In contrast, contraction of CAZy family genes in Z. tritici suggests a specialization on the types of carbon sources utilized for nutrition (139).

Recent gene gains and losses have occurred during the evolution of insect-associated fungi, and these changes appear to impact host specificity. The transition between generalist and specialist in Metarhizium species may have been driven by gene family contractions (140, 141). The “domesticated” fungus cultivated by leaf cutter ants, Leucoagaricus gongylophorus, has an expansion of CAZymes related to polysaccharide degradation. These enzymes are differentially expressed depending on the plant substrates “fed” to the fungus garden by leaf cutter farming ants (142148). The specialized gongylidia that are swellings of the hyphal tip have evolved to provide a sugar nutrient source for the ants in exchange for the input of leaf and plant material into the fungal garden. The expansion and specialization of the fungal enzyme families necessary for rapid extraction of carbohydrates from plant material have likely been driven by this highly mutualistic symbiosis (146148).

Expansions are not always linked to pathogenicity. The extensive light-responsive nature of the zygomycete Phycomyces blakesleaanus (Mucoromyoctina; Mucoromycota) is likely the result of the expansion of signaling pathways (149). These signaling protein expansions are also seen in the relatively closely related species Rhizopus delemar (previously identified as Rhizopus oryzae) (150), which may have enabled these coprophilic fungi to optimize the timing of fruiting and spore maturation in sync with the ephemeral ecology of a dung. Producing and orienting spore-forming structures at the right time of day can maximize the probability that offspring will be dispersed and establish the next generation. Genes encoding hydrophobin proteins, which are important for fruiting body development in mushrooms, are also expanded in copy number in Agaricomycotina species (151154). The p450 monoxygenase family is also highly expanded in mushroom-forming fungi, especially in white rot fungi such as Phanerochaete, which likely allow it to degrade a rich collection of substrates including lignin (62, 151, 155). These expansions may have been important in niche adaptations and the evolution of specific traits such as lignin modifications and degradation, decomposition of complex hydrocarbons, and the ability to grow as a biotrophic plant pathogen (156162).

Gene family contractions

Gene family contraction and gene loss have contributed to the evolution of fungal genomes. Some of these changes can be correlated to recent shifts in ecology, while other analyses have revealed ancient changes that appear to underlie a simplification in growth morphology. Researchers undertook a comparative analysis of 59 fungal genomes and examined changes in gene families corresponding to five independent lineages that grow primarily as single-cell yeast forms. The analysis used a newly developed method called COMPARE (comparative phylogenomic analysis of trait evolution) to infer that evolution of yeast growth forms occurred by convergent evolutionary processes leading to parallel, independent gene family losses (36). The predominant pattern of observed losses was in plant cell wall-degrading enzymes, fungal lysozymes, p450 families, and cyclophilins that serve as molecular chaperones.

Gene family contractions are evident in the plant pathogen Colletotrichum (Glomerellales; Sordariomycetes) and are associated with host range contractions (163), suggesting that host specificity may be a result of gene losses. Extensive gene losses were noted in the genome of Escovopsis weberi, an ascomycete pathogen of the Leucoagaricus ant-farmed basidiomycete fungi. These extensive gene losses in this species could result from specialization to mycoparasitism (164). Gene family contractions are not seen in the related mycoparasitic Trichoderma sp., suggesting a different route of host specialization in Escovopsis. Losses of gene families such as of dehydrogenases have been documented in the insect pathogens Metarhizium and interpreted to reflect adaptation to host specificity (141).

A lack of duplicate genes is not always a direct result of gene loss. In species in which repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) occurs, gene duplications cannot persist because RIP, a genome defense mechanism, targets duplicated sequences so that they accumulate point mutations during the meiotic cycle (165, 166). RIP is hypothesized to be a potent defense against transposable element proliferation because both the source and transposed copy of an element will become mutated. The genome of the ascomycete Neurospora crassa has been shaped by RIP. N. crassa does not have a reduced genome (40 Mb, ∼10,000 genes), lacks nearly any active transposable elements, and also does not have any large gene families (167, 168).

GENOME STABILITY AND PAN-GENOMES

Gene content and genome copy number can vary, sometimes dramatically, in a population and across a species. Sequenced genomes represent a snapshot of the genomic information of a species or strain. The inventory of genes revealed by sequencing can be useful when comparing between isolates or sampling a population of individuals at different times. Changes in genomic content can occur among individuals in a population or even within a strain over time. Considering the complete set of genes across all strains or individuals of a species is deemed the pan-genome (169), which can be a useful way to think about not just gene presence/absence compared to a “reference” but also about the complete set of genes that exists in a species or a collection of individuals (170). Genetic variation includes single nucleotide substitutions, insertion/deletions, or larger genetic content changes such as transposable elements and transposition events. The presence (1), absence (0), or amplification of copy numbers (>1 copy) in a gene can also be evaluated among individuals in a population. Together, these approaches can rank and identify quickly or slowly evolving genes and evaluate the evolutionary lability of genes and pathways which could underlie changes in function among populations and species.

Investigations have revealed that gene content and genome copy number can vary, sometimes dramatically, in a population and across a species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, completed genomes of 100 individual strains have been used to generate a pan-genome of fungal genes, some of which are present in some but not all strains (171). Changes are more common, but not exclusive to subtelomeric regions of chromosomes. Variation in the tempo and mode of chromosomal rearrangements and gene shuffling can be seen in wild and domesticated species when comparing S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus (172) and wild or domesticated Aspergillus strains (173, 174). The human pathogen C. gattii has genomic segments that vary in copy number, segregate in the population, and could be a contributing mechanism to virulence differences among strains (85, 175).

The importance of genome variation at the population level is also appreciated in plant pathogenic fungi where variation in virulence and prevalence from year to year can sometimes be linked to a single gene or to changes in chromosome content. Genes encoded on dispensable chromosomes are sources of rapid changes in gene content because these chromosomes can be transferred between individual strains and often lost without disruption of primary metabolic or cellular functions (176178). Also known as accessory chromosomes, these may accumulate transposable elements and evolve more quickly than other chromosomes because they typically do not encode essential genes (108, 179). These chromosomes further support a mechanism of gaining or losing sets of genes that may be important in adaptation to new host plants (178). The relative importance and molecular mechanism impacted by these genetic elements in modulating adaptability of species remains to be explored but can be important contributors to genome evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete sequencing of fungal genomes has enabled comparisons of the dynamic genome size and gene content across a range of time in fungal evolution. Genome differences that are also identified through comparative genomics can help to form hypotheses about molecular mechanisms for adaptation to new ecological niches or fungal-host specialization. These identified changes establish guides for further genetic and molecular biology experimentation. Genome content comparisons also highlight the relative lability of fungal processes: core metabolism changes little, but copy numbers of transcription factors, secondary metabolites, and transporter families ebb and wane across the kingdom. Sequencing and analysis tools have permitted the detailed cataloging of where and how much change occurs across genomes, providing rationale for molecular experiments to study the functions of the genes implicated.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Stajich JE, Berbee ML, Blackwell M, Hibbett DS, James TY, Spatafora JW, Taylor JW. 2009. The fungi. Curr Biol 19:R840–R845 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.James TY, Letcher PM, Longcore JE, Mozley-Standridge SE, Porter D, Powell MJ, Griffith GW, Vilgalys R. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of the flagellated fungi (Chytridiomycota) and description of a new phylum (Blastocladiomycota). Mycologia 98:860–871 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–491 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p 315–322. In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (ed), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, Barns SM, Gonzalez D, Hibbett DS, Lane DJ, Simon L, Stickel S, Szaro TM, Weisburg WG, Sogin ML. 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1:231–241 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90020-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kurtzman CP. 1994. Molecular taxonomy of the yeasts. Yeast 10:1727–1740 10.1002/yea.320101306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Spatafora JW, Mitchell TG, Vilgalys R. 1995. Analysis of genes coding for small-subunit rRNA sequences in studying phylogenetics of dematiaceous fungal pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 33:1322–1326. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moncalvo JM, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys R. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst Biol 49:278–305 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, Catherine Aime M, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJ, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Greg Thorn R, Jacobsson S, Clémençon H, Miller OK Jr. 2002. One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:357–400 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Donnell K, Lutzoni FM, Ward TJ, Benny GL. 2001. Evolutionary relationships among mucoralean fungi (Zygomycota): evidence for family polyphyly on a large scale. Mycologia 93:286–297 10.2307/3761650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Redecker D, Raab P. 2006. Phylogeny of the glomeromycota (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi): recent developments and new gene markers. Mycologia 98:885–895 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spatafora JW, Sung G-H, Johnson D, Hesse C, O’Rourke B, Serdani M, Spotts R, Lutzoni F, Hofstetter V, Miadlikowska J, Reeb V, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Lumbsch T, Lücking R, Schmitt I, Hosaka K, Aptroot A, Roux C, Miller AN, Geiser DM, Hafellner J, Hestmark G, Arnold AE, Büdel B, Rauhut A, Hewitt D, Untereiner WA, Cole MS, Scheidegger C, Schultz M, Sipman H, Schoch CL. 2006. A five-gene phylogeny of Pezizomycotina. Mycologia 98:1018–1028 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.James TY, et al. 2006. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443:818–822 10.1038/nature05110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Suh S-O, Blackwell M, Kurtzman CP, Lachance M-A. 2006. Phylogenetics of Saccharomycetales, the ascomycete yeasts. Mycologia 98:1006–1017 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832629. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.White MM, James TY, O’Donnell K, Cafaro MJ, Tanabe Y, Sugiyama J. 2006. Phylogeny of the Zygomycota based on nuclear ribosomal sequence data. Mycologia 98:872–884 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832617. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McLaughlin DJ, Hibbett DS, Lutzoni F, Spatafora JW, Vilgalys R. 2009. The search for the fungal tree of life. Trends Microbiol 17:488–497 10.1016/j.tim.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schoch CL, et al. 2009. The Ascomycota tree of life: a phylum-wide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Syst Biol 58:224–239 10.1093/sysbio/syp020. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang Y, Tretter ED, Johnson EM, Kandel P, Lichtwardt RW, Novak SJ, Smith JF, White MM. 2014. Using a five-gene phylogeny to test morphology-based hypotheses of Smittium and allies, endosymbiotic gut fungi (Harpellales) associated with arthropods. Mol Phylogenet Evol 79:23–41 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Porter TM, Martin W, James TY, Longcore JE, Gleason FH, Adler PH, Letcher PM, Vilgalys R. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the Blastocladiomycota (Fungi) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA. Fungal Biol 115:381–392 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, Fisher MC. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 31:21–32 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Taylor JW, Turner E, Townsend JP, Dettman JR, Jacobson D. 2006. Eukaryotic microbes, species recognition and the geographic limits of species: examples from the kingdom Fungi. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:1947–1963 10.1098/rstb.2006.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW. 2006. Multilocus sequence data reveal extensive phylogenetic species diversity within the Neurospora discreta complex. Mycologia 98:436–446 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vialle A, Feau N, Frey P, Bernier L, Hamelin RC. 2013. Phylogenetic species recognition reveals host-specific lineages among poplar rust fungi. Mol Phylogenet Evol 66:628–644. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hibbett DS, et al. 2007. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol Res 111:509–547 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O’Malley MA, Wideman JG, Ruiz-Trillo I. 2016. Losing complexity: the role of simplification in macroevolution. Trends Ecol Evol 31:608–621 10.1016/j.tree.2016.04.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Celio GJ, Padamsee M, Dentinger BTM, Bauer R, McLaughlin DJ. 2006. Assembling the fungal tree of life: constructing the structural and biochemical database. Mycologia 98:850–859 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar TKA, Crow JA, Wennblom TJ, Abril M, Letcher PM, Blackwell M, Roberson RW, McLaughlin DJ. 2011. An ontology of fungal subcellular traits. Am J Bot 98:1504–1510 10.3732/ajb.1100047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hibbett DS, Stajich JE, Spatafora JW. 2013. Toward genome-enabled mycology. Mycologia 105:1339–1349 10.3852/13-196. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hall C, Dietrich FS. 2007. The reacquisition of biotin prototrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and gene clustering. Genetics 177:2293–2307 10.1534/genetics.107.074963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gojković Z, Knecht W, Zameitat E, Warneboldt J, Coutelis JB, Pynyaha Y, Neuveglise C, Møller K, Löffler M, Piskur J. 2004. Horizontal gene transfer promoted evolution of the ability to propagate under anaerobic conditions in yeasts. Mol Genet Genomics 271:387–393 10.1007/s00438-004-0995-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, Merico A, Compagno C. 2006. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 22:183–186 10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sharpton TJ, Stajich JE, Rounsley SD, Gardner MJ, Wortman JR, Jordar VS, Maiti R, Kodira CD, Neafsey DE, Zeng Q, Hung C-Y, McMahan C, Muszewska A, Grynberg M, Mandel MA, Kellner EM, Barker BM, Galgiani JN, Orbach MJ, Kirkland TN, Cole GT, Henn MR, Birren BW, Taylor JW. 2009. Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives. Genome Res 19:1722–1731 10.1101/gr.087551.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Whiston E, Taylor JW. 2016. Comparative phylogenomics of pathogenic and nonpathogenic species. G3 (Bethesda) 6:235–244 10.1534/g3.115.022806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Muszewska A, Taylor JW, Szczesny P, Grynberg M. 2011. Independent subtilases expansions in fungi associated with animals. Mol Biol Evol 28:3395–3404 10.1093/molbev/msr176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nagy LG, Ohm RA, Kovács GM, Floudas D, Riley R, Gácser A, Sipiczki M, Davis JM, Doty SL, de Hoog GS, Lang BF, Spatafora JW, Martin FM, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS. 2014. Latent homology and convergent regulatory evolution underlies the repeated emergence of yeasts. Nat Commun 5:4471 10.1038/ncomms5471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nguyen TA, Cissé OH, Yun Wong J, Zheng P, Hewitt D, Nowrousian M, Stajich JE, Jedd G. 2017. Innovation and constraint leading to complex multicellularity in the Ascomycota. Nat Commun 8:14444 10.1038/ncomms14444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carvalho-Santos Z, Machado P, Branco P, Tavares-Cadete F, Rodrigues-Martins A, Pereira-Leal JB, Bettencourt-Dias M. 2010. Stepwise evolution of the centriole-assembly pathway. J Cell Sci 123:1414–1426 10.1242/jcs.064931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A. 2007. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 449:54–61 10.1038/nature06107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G. 2006. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol 6:99 10.1186/1471-2148-6-99. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gibbons JG, Janson EM, Hittinger CT, Johnston M, Abbot P, Rokas A. 2009. Benchmarking next-generation transcriptome sequencing for functional and evolutionary genomics. Mol Biol Evol 26:2731–2744 10.1093/molbev/msp188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Floudas D, et al. 2012. The Paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 336:1715–1719 10.1126/science.1221748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Spatafora JW, Chang Y, Benny GL, Lazarus K, Smith ME, Berbee ML, Bonito G, Corradi N, Grigoriev I, Gryganskyi A, James TY, O’Donnell K, Roberson RW, Taylor TN, Uehling J, Vilgalys R, White MM, Stajich JE. 2016. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 108:1028–1046 10.3852/16-042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Reeb V, Lutzoni F, Roux C. 2004. Contribution of RPB2 to multilocus phylogenetic studies of the euascomycetes (Pezizomycotina, Fungi) with special emphasis on the lichen-forming Acarosporaceae and evolution of polyspory. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:1036–1060. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moncalvo J-M, Nilsson RH, Koster B, Dunham SM, Bernauer T, Matheny PB, Porter TM, Margaritescu S, Weiss M, Garnica S, Danell E, Langer G, Langer E, Larsson E, Larsson K-H, Vilgalys R. 2006. The cantharelloid clade: dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Mycologia 98:937–948 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Strandberg R, Nygren K, Menkis A, James TY, Wik L, Stajich JE, Johannesson H. 2010. Conflict between reproductive gene trees and species phylogeny among heterothallic and pseudohomothallic members of the filamentous ascomycete genus Neurospora. Fungal Genet Biol 47:869–878 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salichos L, Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327–331 10.1038/nature12130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Salichos L, Stamatakis A, Rokas A. 2014. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 31:1261–1271 10.1093/molbev/msu061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bradley DJ, Kjellbom P, Lamb CJ. 1992. Elicitor- and wound-induced oxidative cross-linking of a proline-rich plant cell wall protein: a novel, rapid defense response. Cell 70:21–30 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90530-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lamb CJ, Lawton MA, Dron M, Dixon RA. 1989. Signals and transduction mechanisms for activation of plant defenses against microbial attack. Cell 56:215–224 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90894-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kohler A, et al., Mycorrhizal Genomics Initiative Consortium. 2015. Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. Nat Genet 47:410–415 10.1038/ng.3223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Martin F, et al. 2008. The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 452:88–92 10.1038/nature06556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Plett JM, Kemppainen M, Kale SD, Kohler A, Legué V, Brun A, Tyler BM, Pardo AG, Martin F. 2011. A secreted effector protein of Laccaria bicolor is required for symbiosis development. Curr Biol 21:1197–1203 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kloppholz S, Kuhn H, Requena N. 2011. A secreted fungal effector of Glomus intraradices promotes symbiotic biotrophy. Curr Biol 21:1204–1209 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sędzielewska Toro K, Brachmann A. 2016. The effector candidate repertoire of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus clarus. BMC Genomics 17:101 10.1186/s12864-016-2422-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dashtban M, Schraft H, Syed TA, Qin W. 2010. Fungal biodegradation and enzymatic modification of lignin. Int J Biochem Mol Biol 1:36–50. [PubMed] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Eastwood DC, Floudas D, Binder M, Majcherczyk A, Schneider P, Aerts A, Asiegbu FO, Baker SE, Barry K, Bendiksby M, Blumentritt M, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, de Vries RP, Gathman A, Goodell B, Henrissat B, Ihrmark K, Kauserud H, Kohler A, LaButti K, Lapidus A, Lavin JL, Lee YH, Lindquist E, Lilly W, Lucas S, Morin E, Murat C, Oguiza JA, Park J, Pisabarro AG, Riley R, Rosling A, Salamov A, Schmidt O, Schmutz J, Skrede I, Stenlid J, Wiebenga A, Xie X, Kües U, Hibbett DS, Hoffmeister D, Högberg N, Martin F, Grigoriev IV, Watkinson SC. 2011. The plant cell wall-decomposing machinery underlies the functional diversity of forest fungi. Science 333:762–765 10.1126/science.1205411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ohm RA, Riley R, Salamov A, Min B, Choi I-G, Grigoriev IV. 2014. Genomics of wood-degrading fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 72:82–90 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nagy LG, Riley R, Tritt A, Adam C, Daum C, Floudas D, Sun H, Yadav JS, Pangilinan J, Larsson K-H, Matsuura K, Barry K, Labutti K, Kuo R, Ohm RA, Bhattacharya SS, Shirouzu T, Yoshinaga Y, Martin FM, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS. 2016. Comparative genomics of early-diverging mushroom-forming fungi provides insights into the origins of lignocellulose decay capabilities. Mol Biol Evol 33:959–970 10.1093/molbev/msv337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Floudas D, Held BW, Riley R, Nagy LG, Koehler G, Ransdell AS, Younus H, Chow J, Chiniquy J, Lipzen A, Tritt A, Sun H, Haridas S, LaButti K, Ohm RA, Kües U, Blanchette RA, Grigoriev IV, Minto RE, Hibbett DS. 2015. Evolution of novel wood decay mechanisms in Agaricales revealed by the genome sequences of Fistulina hepatica and Cylindrobasidium torrendii. Fungal Genet Biol 76:78–92 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Riley R, Salamov AA, Brown DW, Nagy LG, Floudas D, Held BW, Levasseur A, Lombard V, Morin E, Otillar R, Lindquist EA, Sun H, LaButti KM, Schmutz J, Jabbour D, Luo H, Baker SE, Pisabarro AG, Walton JD, Blanchette RA, Henrissat B, Martin F, Cullen D, Hibbett DS, Grigoriev IV. 2014. Extensive sampling of basidiomycete genomes demonstrates inadequacy of the white-rot/brown-rot paradigm for wood decay fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9923–9928. (Erratum, 111:14959. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400592111.) [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fernandez-Fueyo E, et al. 2012. Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:5458–5463 10.1073/pnas.1119912109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Orpin CG, Joblin KN. 1997. The rumen anaerobic fungi, p 140–195. In Hobson PN, Stewart CS (ed), The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Orpin CG. 1994. Anaerobic fungi: taxonomy, biology and distribution in nature, p 1–46. In Mountfort DO, Orpin CG (ed), Anaerobic Fungi: Biology, Ecology, and Function. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Conley CA, Ishkhanova G, McKay CP, Cullings K. 2006. A preliminary survey of non-lichenized fungi cultured from the hyperarid Atacama Desert of Chile. Astrobiology 6:521–526 10.1089/ast.2006.6.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gonçalves VN, Cantrell CL, Wedge DE, Ferreira MC, Soares MA, Jacob MR, Oliveira FS, Galante D, Rodrigues F, Alves TMA, Zani CL, Junior PAS, Murta S, Romanha AJ, Barbosa EC, Kroon EG, Oliveira JG, Gomez-Silva B, Galetovic A, Rosa CA, Rosa LH. 2016. Fungi associated with rocks of the Atacama Desert: taxonomy, distribution, diversity, ecology and bioprospection for bioactive compounds. Environ Microbiol 18:232–245 10.1111/1462-2920.13005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kogej T, Ramos J, Plemenitaš A, Gunde-Cimerman N. 2005. The halophilic fungus Hortaea werneckii and the halotolerant fungus Aureobasidium pullulans maintain low intracellular cation concentrations in hypersaline environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6600–6605 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6600-6605.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Selbmann L, de Hoog GS, Mazzaglia A, Friedmann EI, Onofri S. 2005. Fungi at the edge of life: cryptendolithic black fungi from Antarctic desert. Stud Mycol 51:1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zucconi L, Onofri S, Cecchini C, Isola D, Ripa C, Fenice M, Madonna S, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Selbmann L. 2016. Mapping the lithic colonization at the boundaries of life in Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 39:91–102 10.1007/s00300-014-1624-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Powell AJ, Parchert KJ, Bustamante JM, Ricken JB, Hutchinson MI, Natvig DO. 2012. Thermophilic fungi in an aridland ecosystem. Mycologia 104:813–825 10.3852/11-298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Morgenstern I, Powlowski J, Ishmael N, Darmond C, Marqueteau S, Moisan M-C, Quenneville G, Tsang A. 2012. A molecular phylogeny of thermophilic fungi. Fungal Biol 116:489–502 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Romanelli RA, Houston CW, Barnett SM. 1975. Studies on thermophilic cellulolytic fungi. Appl Microbiol 30:276–281. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Berka RM, Grigoriev IV, Otillar R, Salamov A, Grimwood J, Reid I, Ishmael N, John T, Darmond C, Moisan M-C, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Lombard V, Natvig DO, Lindquist E, Schmutz J, Lucas S, Harris P, Powlowski J, Bellemare A, Taylor D, Butler G, de Vries RP, Allijn IE, van den Brink J, Ushinsky S, Storms R, Powell AJ, Paulsen IT, Elbourne LDH, Baker SE, Magnuson J, Laboissiere S, Clutterbuck AJ, Martinez D, Wogulis M, de Leon AL, Rey MW, Tsang A. 2011. Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat Biotechnol 29:922–927 10.1038/nbt.1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Amlacher S, Sarges P, Flemming D, van Noort V, Kunze R, Devos DP, Arumugam M, Bork P, Hurt E. 2011. Insight into structure and assembly of the nuclear pore complex by utilizing the genome of a eukaryotic thermophile. Cell 146:277–289 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.039. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Keeling PJ, Slamovits CH. 2004. Simplicity and complexity of microsporidian genomes. Eukaryot Cell 3:1363–1369 10.1128/EC.3.6.1363-1369.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Akiyoshi DE, Morrison HG, Lei S, Feng X, Zhang Q, Corradi N, Mayanja H, Tumwine JK, Keeling PJ, Weiss LM, Tzipori S. 2009. Genomic survey of the non-cultivatable opportunistic human pathogen, Enterocytozoon bieneusi. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000261 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Corradi N, Haag KL, Pombert J-F, Ebert D, Keeling PJ. 2009. Draft genome sequence of the Daphnia pathogen Octosporea bayeri: insights into the gene content of a large microsporidian genome and a model for host-parasite interactions. Genome Biol 10:R106 10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pombert J-F, Xu J, Smith DR, Heiman D, Young S, Cuomo CA, Weiss LM, Keeling PJ. 2013. Complete genome sequences from three genetically distinct strains reveal high intraspecies genetic diversity in the microsporidian Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Eukaryot Cell 12:503–511 10.1128/EC.00312-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel JD, Jacq C, Johnston M, Louis EJ, Mewes HW, Murakami Y, Philippsen P, Tettelin H, Oliver SG. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274:546–567, 563–567 10.1126/science.274.5287.546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wood V, et al. 2002. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415:871–880 10.1038/nature724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.James TY, Pelin A, Bonen L, Ahrendt S, Sain D, Corradi N, Stajich JE. 2013. Shared signatures of parasitism and phylogenomics unite Cryptomycota and microsporidia. Curr Biol 23:1548–1553 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Toome M, Ohm RA, Riley RW, James TY, Lazarus KL, Henrissat B, Albu S, Boyd A, Chow J, Clum A, Heller G, Lipzen A, Nolan M, Sandor L, Zvenigorodsky N, Grigoriev IV, Spatafora JW, Aime MC. 2014. Genome sequencing provides insight into the reproductive biology, nutritional mode and ploidy of the fern pathogen Mixia osmundae. New Phytol 202:554–564 10.1111/nph.12653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Janbon G, et al. 2014. Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii reveals complex RNA expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation. PLoS Genet 10:e1004261 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Loftus BJ, et al. 2005. The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 307:1321–1324 10.1126/science.1103773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.D’Souza CA, Kronstad JW, Taylor G, Warren R, Yuen M, Hu G, Jung WH, Sham A, Kidd SE, Tangen K, Lee N, Zeilmaker T, Sawkins J, McVicker G, Shah S, Gnerre S, Griggs A, Zeng Q, Bartlett K, Li W, Wang X, Heitman J, Stajich JE, Fraser JA, Meyer W, Carter D, Schein J, Krzywinski M, Kwon-Chung KJ, Varma A, Wang J, Brunham R, Fyfe M, Ouellette BFF, Siddiqui A, Marra M, Jones S, Holt R, Birren BW, Galagan JE, Cuomo CA. 2011. Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts. MBio 2:e00342-10 10.1128/mBio.00342-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dujon B, et al. 2004. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430:35–44 10.1038/nature02579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Peter M, Kohler A, Ohm RA, Kuo A, Krützmann J, Morin E, Arend M, Barry KW, Binder M, Choi C, Clum A, Copeland A, Grisel N, Haridas S, Kipfer T, LaButti K, Lindquist E, Lipzen A, Maire R, Meier B, Mihaltcheva S, Molinier V, Murat C, Pöggeler S, Quandt CA, Sperisen C, Tritt A, Tisserant E, Crous PW, Henrissat B, Nehls U, Egli S, Spatafora JW, Grigoriev IV, Martin FM. 2016. Ectomycorrhizal ecology is imprinted in the genome of the dominant symbiotic fungus Cenococcum geophilum. Nat Commun 7:12662 10.1038/ncomms12662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Martin F, et al. 2010. Périgord black truffle genome uncovers evolutionary origins and mechanisms of symbiosis. Nature 464:1033–1038 10.1038/nature08867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Spanu PD, et al. 2010. Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism. Science 330:1543–1546 10.1126/science.1194573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Murrin F, Holtby J, Noland RA, Davidson WS. 1986. The genome of Entomophaga aulicae (Entomophthorales, Zygomycetes): base composition and size. Exp Mycol 10:67–75 10.1016/0147-5975(86)90032-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.De Fine Licht HH, Jensen AB, Eilenberg J. 2017. Comparative transcriptomics reveal host-specific nucleotide variation in entomophthoralean fungi. Mol Ecol 26:2092–2110 10.1111/mec.13863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Małagocka J, Grell MN, Lange L, Eilenberg J, Jensen AB. 2015. Transcriptome of an entomophthoralean fungus (Pandora formicae) shows molecular machinery adjusted for successful host exploitation andtransmission. J Invertebr Pathol 128:47–56 10.1016/j.jip.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tavares S, Ramos AP, Pires AS, Azinheira HG, Caldeirinha P, Link T, Abranches R, Silva MC, Voegele RT, Loureiro J, Talhinhas P. 2014. Genome size analyses of Pucciniales reveal the largest fungal genomes. Front Plant Sci 5:422 10.3389/fpls.2014.00422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Williams BAP, Lee RCH, Becnel JJ, Weiss LM, Fast NM, Keeling PJ. 2008. Genome sequence surveys of Brachiola algerae and Edhazardia aedis reveal microsporidia with low gene densities. BMC Genomics 9:200 10.1186/1471-2164-9-200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Katinka MD, Duprat S, Cornillot E, Méténier G, Thomarat F, Prensier G, Barbe V, Peyretaillade E, Brottier P, Wincker P, Delbac F, El Alaoui H, Peyret P, Saurin W, Gouy M, Weissenbach J, Vivarès CP. 2001. Genome sequence and gene compaction of the eukaryote parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nature 414:450–453 10.1038/35106579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cuomo CA, Desjardins CA, Bakowski MA, Goldberg J, Ma AT, Becnel JJ, Didier ES, Fan L, Heiman DI, Levin JZ, Young S, Zeng Q, Troemel ER. 2012. Microsporidian genome analysis reveals evolutionary strategies for obligate intracellular growth. Genome Res 22:2478–2488 10.1101/gr.142802.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Troemel ER, Becnel JJ. 2015. Genome analysis and polar tube firing dynamics of mosquito-infecting microsporidia. Fungal Genet Biol 83:41–44 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Corradi N, Akiyoshi DE, Morrison HG, Feng X, Weiss LM, Tzipori S, Keeling PJ. 2007. Patterns of genome evolution among the microsporidian parasites Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Antonospora locustae and Enterocytozoon bieneusi. PLoS One 2:e1277 10.1371/journal.pone.0001277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Corradi N, Gangaeva A, Keeling PJ. 2008. Comparative profiling of overlapping transcription in the compacted genomes of microsporidia Antonospora locustae and Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Genomics 91:388–393 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hauser PM, Burdet FX, Cissé OH, Keller L, Taffé P, Sanglard D, Pagni M. 2010. Comparative genomics suggests that the fungal pathogen pneumocystis is an obligate parasite scavenging amino acids from its host’s lungs. PLoS One 5:e15152. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cissé OH, Pagni M, Hauser PM. 2012. De novo assembly of the Pneumocystis jirovecii genome from a single bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimen from a patient. MBio 4:e00428-12 10.1128/mBio.00428-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Almeida JMGCF, Cissé OH, Fonseca Á, Pagni M, Hauser PM. 2015. Comparative genomics suggests primary homothallism of Pneumocystis species. MBio 6:e02250-14 10.1128/mBio.02250-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Dietrich FS, Voegeli S, Brachat S, Lerch A, Gates K, Steiner S, Mohr C, Pöhlmann R, Luedi P, Choi S, Wing RA, Flavier A, Gaffney TD, Philippsen P. 2004. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304:304–307 10.1126/science.1095781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Raffaele S, Kamoun S. 2012. Genome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:417–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dong S, Raffaele S, Kamoun S. 2015. The two-speed genomes of filamentous pathogens: waltz with plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 35:57–65 10.1016/j.gde.2015.09.001. (Erratum, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451981?dopt=Abstract#comments.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rouxel T, Grandaubert J, Hane JK, Hoede C, van de Wouw AP, Couloux A, Dominguez V, Anthouard V, Bally P, Bourras S, Cozijnsen AJ, Ciuffetti LM, Degrave A, Dilmaghani A, Duret L, Fudal I, Goodwin SB, Gout L, Glaser N, Linglin J, Kema GH, Lapalu N, Lawrence CB, May K, Meyer M, Ollivier B, Poulain J, Schoch CL, Simon A, Spatafora JW, Stachowiak A, Turgeon BG, Tyler BM, Vincent D, Weissenbach J, Amselem J, Quesneville H, Oliver RP, Wincker P, Balesdent MH, Howlett BJ. 2011. Effector diversification within compartments of the Leptosphaeria maculans genome affected by repeat-induced point mutations. Nat Commun 2:202 10.1038/ncomms1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Raffaele S, Farrer RA, Cano LM, Studholme DJ, MacLean D, Thines M, Jiang RHY, Zody MC, Kunjeti SG, Donofrio NM, Meyers BC, Nusbaum C, Kamoun S. 2010. Genome evolution following host jumps in the Irish potato famine pathogen lineage. Science 330:1540–1543 10.1126/science.1193070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sperschneider J, Gardiner DM, Thatcher LF, Lyons R, Singh KB, Manners JM, Taylor JM. 2015. Genome-wide analysis in three Fusarium pathogens identifies rapidly evolving chromosomes and genes associated with pathogenicity. Genome Biol Evol 7:1613–1627 10.1093/gbe/evv092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Croll D, McDonald BA. 2012. The accessory genome as a cradle for adaptive evolution in pathogens. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002608 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Grandaubert J, Lowe RG, Soyer JL, Schoch CL, Van de Wouw AP, Fudal I, Robbertse B, Lapalu N, Links MG, Ollivier B, Linglin J, Barbe V, Mangenot S, Cruaud C, Borhan H, Howlett BJ, Balesdent M-H, Rouxel T. 2014. Transposable element-assisted evolution and adaptation to host plant within the Leptosphaeria maculans-Leptosphaeria biglobosa species complex of fungal pathogens. BMC Genomics 15:891 10.1186/1471-2164-15-891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Faino L, Seidl MF, Shi-Kunne X, Pauper M, van den Berg GCM, Wittenberg AHJ, Thomma BPHJ. 2016. Transposons passively and actively contribute to evolution of the two-speed genome of a fungal pathogen. Genome Res 26:1091–1100 10.1101/gr.204974.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Burke DT, Carle GF, Olson MV. 1987. Cloning of large segments of exogenous DNA into yeast by means of artificial chromosome vectors. Science 236:806–812 10.1126/science.3033825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Galitski T, Saldanha AJ, Styles CA, Lander ES, Fink GR. 1999. Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 285:251–254 10.1126/science.285.5425.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mable BK, Otto SP. 2001. Masking and purging mutations following EMS treatment in haploid, diploid and tetraploid yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Genet Res 77:9–26 10.1017/S0016672300004821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, Amon A. 2007. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916–924 10.1126/science.1142210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401–1404 10.1126/science.1089370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lynch M. 2007. The Origins of Genome Architecture. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Huerta-Cepas J, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Pryszcz LP, Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T. 2014. PhylomeDB v4: zooming into the plurality of evolutionary histories of a genome. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D897–D902 10.1093/nar/gkt1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kersey PJ, Allen JE, Christensen M, Davis P, Falin LJ, Grabmueller C, Hughes DST, Humphrey J, Kerhornou A, Khobova J, Langridge N, McDowall MD, Maheswari U, Maslen G, Nuhn M, Ong CK, Paulini M, Pedro H, Toneva I, Tuli MA, Walts B, Williams G, Wilson D, Youens-Clark K, Monaco MK, Stein J, Wei X, Ware D, Bolser DM, Howe KL, Kulesha E, Lawson D, Staines DM. 2014. Ensembl Genomes 2013: scaling up access to genome-wide data. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D546–D552 10.1093/nar/gkt979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Akcapinar GB, Kappel L, Sezerman OU, Seidl-Seiboth V. 2015. Molecular diversity of LysM carbohydrate-binding motifs in fungi. Curr Genet 61:103–113 10.1007/s00294-014-0471-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Kombrink A, Thomma BPHJ. 2013. LysM effectors: secreted proteins supporting fungal life. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003769 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Teixeira MM, de Almeida LGP, Kubitschek-Barreira P, Alves FL, Kioshima ES, Abadio AKR, Fernandes L, Derengowski LS, Ferreira KS, Souza RC, Ruiz JC, de Andrade NC, Paes HC, Nicola AM, Albuquerque P, Gerber AL, Martins VP, Peconick LDF, Neto AV, Chaucanez CB, Silva PA, Cunha OL, de Oliveira FFM, dos Santos TC, Barros ALN, Soares MA, de Oliveira LM, Marini MM, Villalobos-Duno H, Cunha MML, de Hoog S, da Silveira JF, Henrissat B, Niño-Vega GA, Cisalpino PS, Mora-Montes HM, Almeida SR, Stajich JE, Lopes-Bezerra LM, Vasconcelos ATR, Felipe MSS. 2014. Comparative genomics of the major fungal agents of human and animal sporotrichosis: Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis. BMC Genomics 15:943 10.1186/1471-2164-15-943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Martinez DA, Oliver BG, Gräser Y, Goldberg JM, Li W, Martinez-Rossi NM, Monod M, Shelest E, Barton RC, Birch E, Brakhage AA, Chen Z, Gurr SJ, Heiman D, Heitman J, Kosti I, Rossi A, Saif S, Samalova M, Saunders CW, Shea T, Summerbell RC, Xu J, Young S, Zeng Q, Birren BW, Cuomo CA, White TC. 2012. Comparative genome analysis of Trichophyton rubrum and related dermatophytes reveals candidate genes involved in infection. MBio 3:e00259-12 10.1128/mBio.00259-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Buist G, Steen A, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2008. LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol Microbiol 68:838–847 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.de Jonge R, van Esse HP, Kombrink A, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Bours R, van der Krol S, Shibuya N, Joosten MH, Thomma BP. 2010. Conserved fungal LysM effector Ecp6 prevents chitin-triggered immunity in plants. Science 329:953–955 10.1126/science.1190859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Xue C, Liu T, Chen L, Li W, Liu I, Kronstad JW, Seyfang A, Heitman J. 2010. Role of an expanded inositol transporter repertoire in Cryptococcus neoformans sexual reproduction and virulence. MBio 1:e00084-10 10.1128/mBio.00084-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zaragoza O, Rodrigues ML, De Jesus M, Frases S, Dadachova E, Casadevall A. 2009. The capsule of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Adv Appl Microbiol 68:133–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Perfect JR. 2005. Cryptococcus neoformans: a sugar-coated killer with designer genes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 45:395–404 10.1016/j.femsim.2005.06.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.O’Meara TR, Alspaugh JA. 2012. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: a sword and a shield. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:387–408 10.1128/CMR.00001-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Li J, Zhang K-Q. 2014. Independent expansion of zincin metalloproteinases in Onygenales fungi may be associated with their pathogenicity. PLoS One 9:e90225 10.1371/journal.pone.0090225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Whiston E, Taylor JW. 2014. Genomics in Coccidioides: insights into evolution, ecology, and pathogenesis. Med Mycol 52:149–155 10.1093/mmy/myt001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Muñoz JF, Gauthier GM, Desjardins CA, Gallo JE, Holder J, Sullivan TD, Marty AJ, Carmen JC, Chen Z, Ding L, Gujja S, Magrini V, Misas E, Mitreva M, Priest M, Saif S, Whiston EA, Young S, Zeng Q, Goldman WE, Mardis ER, Taylor JW, McEwen JG, Clay OK, Klein BS, Cuomo CA. 2015. The dynamic genome and transcriptome of the human fungal pathogen Blastomyces and close relative Emmonsia. PLoS Genet 11:e1005493 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Joneson S, Stajich JE, Shiu S-H, Rosenblum EB. 2011. Genomic transition to pathogenicity in chytrid fungi. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002338 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Thekkiniath JC, Zabet-Moghaddam M, San Francisco SK, San Francisco MJ. 2013. A novel subtilisin-like serine protease of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is induced by thyroid hormone and degrades antimicrobial peptides. Fungal Biol 117:451–461 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Abramyan J, Stajich JE. 2012. Species-specific chitin-binding module 18 expansion in the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. MBio 3:e00150-12 10.1128/mBio.00150-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Farrer RA, Martel A, Verbrugghe E, Abouelleil A, Ducatelle R, Longcore JE, James TY, Pasmans F, Fisher MC, Cuomo CA. 2017. Genomic innovations linked to infection strategies across emerging pathogenic chytrid fungi. Nat Commun 8:14742 10.1038/ncomms14742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Liu P, Stajich JE. 2015. Characterization of the Carbohydrate Binding Module 18 gene family in the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Fungal Genet Biol 77:31–39 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Pendleton AL, Smith KE, Feau N, Martin FM, Grigoriev IV, Hamelin R, Nelson CD, Burleigh JG, Davis JM. 2014. Duplications and losses in gene families of rust pathogens highlight putative effectors. Front Plant Sci 5:299 10.3389/fpls.2014.00299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Goodwin SB, et al. 2011. Finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola reveals dispensome structure, chromosome plasticity, and stealth pathogenesis. PLoS Genet 7:e1002070 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Hu X, Xiao G, Zheng P, Shang Y, Su Y, Zhang X, Liu X, Zhan S, St Leger RJ, Wang C. 2014. Trajectory and genomic determinants of fungal-pathogen speciation and host adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:16796–16801 10.1073/pnas.1412662111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Gao Q, Jin K, Ying S-H, Zhang Y, Xiao G, Shang Y, Duan Z, Hu X, Xie X-Q, Zhou G, Peng G, Luo Z, Huang W, Wang B, Fang W, Wang S, Zhong Y, Ma L-J, St Leger RJ, Zhao G-P, Pei Y, Feng M-G, Xia Y, Wang C. 2011. Genome sequencing and comparative transcriptomics of the model entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and M. acridum. PLoS Genet 7:e1001264 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Schiøtt M, De Fine Licht HH, Lange L, Boomsma JJ. 2008. Towards a molecular understanding of symbiont function: identification of a fungal gene for the degradation of xylan in the fungus gardens of leaf-cutting ants. BMC Microbiol 8:40 10.1186/1471-2180-8-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.De Fine Licht HH, Schiøtt M, Mueller UG, Boomsma JJ. 2010. Evolutionary transitions in enzyme activity of ant fungus gardens. Evolution 64:2055–2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Nygaard S, Zhang G, Schiøtt M, Li C, Wurm Y, Hu H, Zhou J, Ji L, Qiu F, Rasmussen M, Pan H, Hauser F, Krogh A, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP, Wang J, Boomsma JJ. 2011. The genome of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior suggests key adaptations to advanced social life and fungus farming. Genome Res 21:1339–1348 10.1101/gr.121392.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.De Fine Licht HH, Schiøtt M, Rogowska-Wrzesinska A, Nygaard S, Roepstorff P, Boomsma JJ. 2013. Laccase detoxification mediates the nutritional alliance between leaf-cutting ants and fungus-garden symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:583–587 10.1073/pnas.1212709110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.De Fine Licht HH, Boomsma JJ, Tunlid A. 2014. Symbiotic adaptations in the fungal cultivar of leaf-cutting ants. Nat Commun 5:5675 10.1038/ncomms6675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Aylward FO, Khadempour L, Tremmel DM, McDonald BR, Nicora CD, Wu S, Moore RJ, Orton DJ, Monroe ME, Piehowski PD, Purvine SO, Smith RD, Lipton MS, Burnum-Johnson KE, Currie CR. 2015. Enrichment and broad representation of plant biomass-degrading enzymes in the specialized hyphal swellings of Leucoagaricus gongylophorus, the fungal symbiont of leaf-cutter ants. PLoS One 10:e0134752. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Khadempour L, Burnum-Johnson KE, Baker ES, Nicora CD, Webb-Robertson BM, White RA III, Monroe ME, Huang EL, Smith RD, Currie CR. 2016. The fungal cultivar of leaf-cutter ants produces specific enzymes in response to different plant substrates. Mol Ecol 25:5795–5805 10.1111/mec.13872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Corrochano LM, et al. 2016. Expansion of signal transduction pathways in fungi by extensive genome duplication. Curr Biol 26:1577–1584 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ma LJ, Ibrahim AS, Skory C, Grabherr MG, Burger G, Butler M, Elias M, Idnurm A, Lang BF, Sone T, Abe A, Calvo SE, Corrochano LM, Engels R, Fu J, Hansberg W, Kim JM, Kodira CD, Koehrsen MJ, Liu B, Miranda-Saavedra D, O’Leary S, Ortiz-Castellanos L, Poulter R, Rodriguez-Romero J, Ruiz-Herrera J, Shen YQ, Zeng Q, Galagan J, Birren BW, Cuomo CA, Wickes BL. 2009. Genomic analysis of the basal lineage fungus Rhizopus oryzae reveals a whole-genome duplication. PLoS Genet 5:e1000549 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Stajich JE, Wilke SK, Ahrén D, Au CH, Birren BW, Borodovsky M, Burns C, Canbäck B, Casselton LA, Cheng CK, Deng J, Dietrich FS, Fargo DC, Farman ML, Gathman AC, Goldberg J, Guigó R, Hoegger PJ, Hooker JB, Huggins A, James TY, Kamada T, Kilaru S, Kodira C, Kües U, Kupfer D, Kwan HS, Lomsadze A, Li W, Lilly WW, Ma L-J, Mackey AJ, Manning G, Martin F, Muraguchi H, Natvig DO, Palmerini H, Ramesh MA, Rehmeyer CJ, Roe BA, Shenoy N, Stanke M, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Tunlid A, Velagapudi R, Vision TJ, Zeng Q, Zolan ME, Pukkila PJ. 2010. Insights into evolution of multicellular fungi from the assembled chromosomes of the mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11889–11894 10.1073/pnas.1003391107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Plett JM, Gibon J, Kohler A, Duffy K, Hoegger PJ, Velagapudi R, Han J, Kües U, Grigoriev IV, Martin F. 2012. Phylogenetic, genomic organization and expression analysis of hydrophobin genes in the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor. Fungal Genet Biol 49:199–209 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Rineau F, Lmalem H, Ahren D, Shah F, Johansson T, Coninx L, Ruytinx J, Nguyen H, Grigoriev I, Kuo A, Kohler A, Morin E, Vangronsveld J, Martin F, Colpaert JV. 2017. Comparative genomics and expression levels of hydrophobins from eight mycorrhizal genomes. Mycorrhiza 27:383–396 10.1007/s00572-016-0758-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Sammer D, Krause K, Gube M, Wagner K, Kothe E. 2016. Hydrophobins in the life cycle of the ectomycorrhizal Basidiomycete Tricholoma vaccinum. PLoS One 11:e0167773 10.1371/journal.pone.0167773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Martinez D, Larrondo LF, Putnam N, Gelpke MD, Huang K, Chapman J, Helfenbein KG, Ramaiya P, Detter JC, Larimer F, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Berka R, Cullen D, Rokhsar D. 2004. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nat Biotechnol 22:695–700 10.1038/nbt967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Doddapaneni H, Chakraborty R, Yadav JS. 2005. Genome-wide structural and evolutionary analysis of the P450 monooxygenase genes (P450ome) in the white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium: evidence for gene duplications and extensive gene clustering. BMC Genomics 6:92 10.1186/1471-2164-6-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Yadav JS, Doddapaneni H, Subramanian V. 2006. P450ome of the white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium: structure, evolution and regulation of expression of genomic P450 clusters. Biochem Soc Trans 34:1165–1169 10.1042/BST0341165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Syed K, Yadav JS. 2012. P450 monooxygenases (P450ome) of the model white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Crit Rev Microbiol 38:339–363 10.3109/1040841X.2012.682050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Syed K, Nelson DR, Riley R, Yadav JS. 2013. Genomewide annotation and comparative genomics of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s) in the polypore species Bjerkandera adusta, Ganoderma sp. and Phlebia brevispora. Mycologia 105:1445–1455 10.3852/13-002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Syed K, Shale K, Pagadala NS, Tuszynski J. 2014. Systematic identification and evolutionary analysis of catalytically versatile cytochrome P450 monooxygenase families enriched in model Basidiomycete fungi. PLoS One. 9:e86683. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Chen W, Lee M-K, Jefcoate C, Kim S-C, Chen F, Yu J-H. 2014. Fungal cytochrome p450 monooxygenases: their distribution, structure, functions, family expansion, and evolutionary origin. Genome Biol Evol 6:1620–1634 10.1093/gbe/evu132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Qhanya LB, Matowane G, Chen W, Sun Y, Letsimo EM, Parvez M, Yu J-H, Mashele SS, Syed K. 2015. Genome-wide annotation and comparative analysis of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in Basidiomycete biotrophic plant pathogens. PLoS One 10:e0142100 10.1371/journal.pone.0142100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Baroncelli R, Amby DB, Zapparata A, Sarrocco S, Vannacci G, Le Floch G, Harrison RJ, Holub E, Sukno SA, Sreenivasaprasad S, Thon MR. 2016. Gene family expansions and contractions are associated with host range in plant pathogens of the genus Colletotrichum. BMC Genomics 17:555 10.1186/s12864-016-2917-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.de Man TJB, Stajich JE, Kubicek CP, Teiling C, Chenthamara K, Atanasova L, Druzhinina IS, Levenkova N, Birnbaum SSL, Barribeau SM, Bozick BA, Suen G, Currie CR, Gerardo NM. 2016. Small genome of the fungus Escovopsis weberi, a specialized disease agent of ant agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:3567–3572 10.1073/pnas.1518501113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Selker EU, Garrett PW. 1988. DNA sequence duplications trigger gene inactivation in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6870–6874 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Selker EU. 1990. Premeiotic instability of repeated sequences in Neurospora crassa. Annu Rev Genet 24:579–613 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.003051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Galagan JE, et al. 2003. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422:859–868 10.1038/nature01554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Galagan JE, Selker EU. 2004. RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. Trends Genet 20:417–423 10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D, Ward NL, Angiuoli SV, Crabtree J, Jones AL, Durkin AS, Deboy RT, Davidsen TM, Mora M, Scarselli M, Margarit y Ros I, Peterson JD, Hauser CR, Sundaram JP, Nelson WC, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Selengut J, Gwinn ML, Zhou L, Zafar N, Khouri H, Radune D, Dimitrov G, Watkins K, O’Connor KJB, Smith S, Utterback TR, White O, Rubens CE, Grandi G, Madoff LC, Kasper DL, Telford JL, Wessels MR, Rappuoli R, Fraser CM. 2005. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial “pan-genome”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13950–13955 10.1073/pnas.0506758102. (Erratum, doi:10.1073/pnas.0506758102.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Medini D, Donati C, Tettelin H, Masignani V, Rappuoli R. 2005. The microbial pan-genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:589–594 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Strope PK, Skelly DA, Kozmin SG, Mahadevan G, Stone EA, Magwene PM, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH. 2015. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res 25:762–774 10.1101/gr.185538.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Yue J-X, Li J, Aigrain L, Hallin J, Persson K, Oliver K, Bergström A, Coupland P, Warringer J, Lagomarsino MC, Fischer G, Durbin R, Liti G. 2017. Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nat Genet 49:913–924 10.1038/ng.3847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Rokas A. 2009. The effect of domestication on the fungal proteome. Trends Genet 25:60–63 10.1016/j.tig.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Gibbons JG, Salichos L, Slot JC, Rinker DC, McGary KL, King JG, Klich MA, Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Rokas A. 2012. The evolutionary imprint of domestication on genome variation and function of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Curr Biol 22:1403–1409 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Steenwyk JL, Soghigian JS, Perfect JR, Gibbons JG. 2016. Copy number variation contributes to cryptic genetic variation in outbreak lineages of Cryptococcus gattii from the North American Pacific Northwest. BMC Genomics 17:700 10.1186/s12864-016-3044-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Ohm RA, Feau N, Henrissat B, Schoch CL, Horwitz BA, Barry KW, Condon BJ, Copeland AC, Dhillon B, Glaser F, Hesse CN, Kosti I, LaButti K, Lindquist EA, Lucas S, Salamov AA, Bradshaw RE, Ciuffetti L, Hamelin RC, Kema GH, Lawrence C, Scott JA, Spatafora JW, Turgeon BG, de Wit PJ, Zhong S, Goodwin SB, Grigoriev IV. 2012. Diverse lifestyles and strategies of plant pathogenesis encoded in the genomes of eighteen Dothideomycetes fungi. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003037 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Balesdent M-H, Fudal I, Ollivier B, Bally P, Grandaubert J, Eber F, Chèvre A-M, Leflon M, Rouxel T. 2013. The dispensable chromosome of Leptosphaeria maculans shelters an effector gene conferring avirulence towards Brassica rapa. New Phytol 198:887–898 10.1111/nph.12178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Stukenbrock EH, Jørgensen FG, Zala M, Hansen TT, McDonald BA, Schierup MH. 2010. Whole-genome and chromosome evolution associated with host adaptation and speciation of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. PLoS Genet 6:e1001189 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Galazka JM, Freitag M. 2014. Variability of chromosome structure in pathogenic fungi: of ‘ends and odds’. Curr Opin Microbiol 20:19–26 10.1016/j.mib.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES