Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2018 Aug 3;97(31):e11420. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011420

RBPJ polymorphisms associated with cerebral infarction diseases in Chinese Han population

A Clinical Trial/Experimental Study (CONSORT Compliant)

Qiong Zhang a,b,c, Jie Zhou c,d, Hong Lei c,d, Chun-Yu Zhu e, Fei-Feng Li c,d,, Dong Zheng a,, Shu-Lin Liu c,d,f,
Editor: Y-h Taguchi
PMCID: PMC6081149  PMID: 30075508

Abstract

Trial design:

Cerebral small vessel diseases (CSVDs) are a group of brain pathological processes involving cerebral small arteries, brain venules, and capillaries. The recombination signal-binding protein Jκ (RBPJ) is implicated in the pathogenesis of these diseases but its actual roles need confirmation. The aim of this work was to evaluate variations in RBPJ gene for their possible associations with the disease.

Methods:

The RBPJ gene was sequenced for 400 patients with cerebral infarction disease and 600 normal controls. The statistical analyses and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests of the patients and control populations were conducted using the SPSS software (version 19.0) and Plink (version 1.9), Haploview software, and online software SNPSpD.

Results:

We characterized variants rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, rs2270226, and rs2788861 within or near the RBPJ gene. The genetic heterozygosity of rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226 was very high. Statistical analysis showed that the variants rs2270226 and rs2077777 in the gene were associated with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases in the Chinese Han population.

Conclusions:

rs2270226 and rs2077777 in the RBPJ gene were associated with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases in the Chinese Han population.

Keywords: cerebral infarction disease, cerebral small-vessel disease, notch signaling pathway, RBPJ

1. Introduction

Cerebral small vessel diseases (CSVDs), with many types including cerebral infarction, are a group of prevalent brain pathological processes involving cerebral small arteries, brain venules, and capillaries.[1,2] These diseases are mainly divided into age-related cerebral small vessel disease, hypertension-related cerebral small vessel disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and are often associated with other mental disorders, such as stroke, cognitive impairment (VCI), and vascular dementia.[36]

Cerebral infarction is among the most common CSVDs, characterized by severe hypoxic ischemic tissue necrosis in the brain, often leading to repeated paralysis, sensory disability, language barrier, dementia, and other long-term functional disabilities with resultant low living quality.[79] Clinically, a variety of therapies have been applied to treat the disease,[10,11] but few are effective.[12,13]

Insights into risk and etiologic factors would help develop novel strategies for the treatment of cerebral infarction diseases. The risk factors so far documented include smoking, obesity, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, diabetes and aging,[14,15] and the pathogenesis involves neuronal cell apoptosis.[16,17] Blockage of the brain blood vessels is the direct cause of the disease, resulting from embolism or thrombosis and leading to cerebral ischemia,[18] which may induce immune responses and inflammation.[15,1923]

The genetic etiology of the cerebral infarction disease involves the Notch signaling pathway,[15,24,25] which is highly conserved in evolution and regulates the expression of many genes involved in cell proliferation or differentiation.[2628] The Notch signaling pathway also affects the proliferation of stem/progenitor cells and supports the central and peripheral nervous systems.[29] In a previous study, we found that variants of the Notch3 gene, combined with aging, are associated with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases.[15]

In the process of Notch pathway functioning, the recombination signal-binding protein Jκ (RBPJ) mediates the signaling from the Notch receptors.[30,31] RBPJ is a DNA binding regulatory factor, which recognizes the consensus sequence “C(T)GTGGGAA” and regulates many factors such as CSL transcription factors family.[32] RBPJ is also associated with some corepressors and represses the Notch transcription,[33] and the SNP rs874040 in RBPJ skews memory T cells toward a proinflammatory phenotype involving the notch signaling pathway.[34] Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the RBPJ may play important roles in the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction diseases.

In the present study, we investigated variants rs2270226 and rs2077777 in the RBPJ gene for their associations with the risk of cerebral infarction disease in the Chinese Han population and demonstrated the association of the central repressor domain and 5’UTR with the functions of RBPJ. These findings provide novel insights into the roles of RBPJ gene in etiology and pathogenesis of the cerebral infarction diseases.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study population

A total of 400 patients with cerebral infarction disease and 600 normal controls were collected at the Department of Neurology and Medical Examination Center of the Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, China. We performed the experiments in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and obtained a written informed consent from each participant. The Ethics Committee of HMU approved this work, which is consistent with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

In the clinical examination, the medical histories and clinical features of the enrolled participants were recorded in detail. The participants also received physical, MRI, and other neurological system examinations. The detailed information of the cerebral infarction patients and normal agedness controls were shown in the previous study.[15]

2.2. DNA analysis

Genomic DNA of all the participants was extracted using standard protocols.[35,36] The transcribed regions and splicing sites of the RBPJ gene were amplified by PCR with the primers shown in Table 1. The PCR products were sequenced for mutational analysis as previously described.[37]

Table 1.

PCR primers used for RBPJ gene sequence analysis.

2.2.

2.3. SNP genotyping analysis

The variations within or near the RBPJ gene were determined for the 400 cerebral infarction patients and 600 normal controls. The DNA regions were amplified and the PCR products were sequenced to determine the genotypes; 2 researchers conducted the measurements independently. Overall cerebral infarction disease genetics correlation analysis was also conducted.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests of the patients and control populations were conducted using the SPSS software (version 19.0)[38] and Plink (version 1.9) as previously reported.[39,40] The experiment-wide significance threshold, matrix of mpirwise linkage-disequilibrium (LD) correlation for the markers and haplotype diagram of LD structure were calculated using the online software SNPSpD and Haploview software as previously reported.[41]

3. Results

3.1. SNP gene analyses

We sequenced the transcribed regions and splicing sites of the RBPJ gene to test the hypothesis that germline common genetic variants in the gene may confer the susceptibility to cerebral infarction diseases. We characterized variants rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, rs2270226, and rs2788861 within or near the RBPJ gene (Fig. 1). Analysis of these SNPs showed that the genetic heterozygosity of rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226 was very high, whereas that of rs2788861 was very low and was excluded from further analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagrams of rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, rs2270226, and rs2788861 within or near the RBPJ gene.

3.2. Polymorphism-disease association analyses

We conducted analyses on the SNPs to inspect their possible associations with the diseases and found that the variants rs2270226 and rs2077777 in the gene were associated with the risk of cerebral infarction in the Chinese Han population (Tables 2 and 3). We conducted the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test for the study population groups, and it was in line with equilibrium (Table 4).

Table 2.

The genotype and allele frequency of rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226 variants in 400 Chinese Han cerebral infarction and 600 normal agedness controls.

3.2.

Table 3.

SNP rs2270226 and rs2077777 varients within the RBPJ gene were associated with risk of cerebral infarction in Chinese Han populations.

3.2.

Table 4.

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test for the study population groups.

3.2.

Experiment-wide significance threshold required to keep Type I error rate at 5% of rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226 was 0.013. The Haploview software was used to conduct LD analysis of the variants rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226, and the results were consistent with the data from the HapMap CHB population (Fig. 2). The genotype frequencies in the disease and control groups were further analyzed by 3 genetic models, including trend, dominant, and recessive models, in addition to chi-square tests, and all results indicated that the variants rs2077777 and rs2270226 were associated with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases (Table 5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LD analysis of the variants rs2871198, rs1397731, rs3822223, rs2077777, and rs2270226 in the RBPJ gene. The LD plots were generated using the Haploview software v4.2. (A) Data analysis between CID patients and controls from the present study; (B) data from HapMap CHB of variants in RBPJ gene. The data from the HapMap CHB and this work were consistent. No numeric in the cube, the value was 100. CID = cerebral infarction diseases, LD = linkage-disequilibrium.

Table 5.

SNP rs2270226 and rs2077777 within RBPJ gene associated with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases.

3.2.

4. Discussion

In the present work, we validated the associations of RBPJ variants rs2270226 and rs2077777 with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases. Certain diseases or genetic factors can change the characteristics of the cerebral vascular systems and contribute to cerebral infarction or other CSVDs.[18,42] In the blood vessel development, the Notch signaling pathway regulates the expression of many genes involved in the cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cell fate decision,[26] and coordinates arterial differentiation of endothelial cells.[4346] Targeted mutations of the Notch target genes could result in embryonic lethality due to severe defects in the angiogenic vascular remodeling.[44,47] RBPJ is a transcriptional regulator, through which the Notch receptor regulates the downstream target genes when the Notch receptors bind with ligands.[48,49] So, the DNA-binding protein RBPJ plays a central role in the Notch signaling pathway.[50] In this work, we found that rs2270226 and rs2077777 in the RBPJ gene were associated with the risk of cerebral infarction disease, possibly via affecting the downstream target genes of the Notch signaling pathway.

As a member of the CSL (CBF-1, Suppressor of Hairless, Lag-2), RBPJ is a major downstream sequence-specific transcriptional repressor in the Notch signaling pathway.[51] By recruiting distinct protein complexes to the promoter, the RBPJ functions on the target genes.[52] The replication and transcription activators in the Notch signaling pathway activate the promoters by binding to the repression domain of RBPJ.[53] It has been reported that mutations in the RBPJ binding sites suppressed the expression of the replication and transcription activators.[54] The rs2077777 and rs2270226 in the RBPJ gene may affect the interactions between RBPJ and the activators.

Via the central repressor domain (aa 179-361 in RBPJ protein), the RBPJ protein recruits corepressor proteins and histone deacetylases, thus inhibiting gene expression.[55] In the Notch signaling pathway, Notch proteins interact with their ligands, triggering a cascade of proteolytic reactions and ultimately liberating a fragment of their cytosolic tail also named Notch intracellular domain.[56] When the fragments are transported to the nucleus, they interact with RBPJ by binding to the RBPJ central repressor domain.[32,57] The rs2270226 variant is located near the central repressor domain of the RBPJ within the aa 50–100 region, consistent with the postulated roles of the central repressor domain for the functions of the RBPJ.

Through different regions or domains, RBPJ interacts with the Notch intracellular region, activates the downstream target genes transcription and regulates cell differentiation,[53,57] such as the central repressor domain of RBPJ interacting with the RAM of Notch intracellular region.[53] On the other hand, the N- and C-terminal regions of RBPJ bind to the Notch intracellular region ankyrin repeat; when mutated, the N- and C-terminal regions are defective in transcriptional activation.[57] Analysis of rs2077777 located near the 5′UTR of the RBPJ gene further demonstrated the important roles of 5’UTR of the gene for its functions.

5. Conclusion

We validated the associations of RBPJ variants rs2270226 and rs2077777 with the risk of cerebral infarction diseases in the Chinese Han population and demonstrated the roles of central repressor domain and 5’UTR for the functions of the RBPJ.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and their families for their cooperation and participation in this study.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Fei-Feng Li, Shu-Lin Liu, Dong Zheng, Qiong Zhang.

Data curation: Qiong Zhang, Chun-Yu Zhu, Jie Zhou, Hong Lei.

Formal analysis: Fei-Feng Li, Qiong Zhang, Dong Zheng, Shu-Lin Liu.

Funding acquisition: Fei-Feng Li, Shu-Lin Liu, Dong Zheng.

Investigation: Fei-Feng Li, Qiong Zhang, Hong Lei, Jie Zhou.

Resources: Fei-Feng Li, Qiong Zhang, Chun-Yu Zhu, Jie Zhou, Hong Lei.

Software: Fei-Feng Li, Qiong Zhang, Dong Zheng, Shu-Lin Liu.

Supervision: Fei-Feng Li, Chun-Yu Zhu, Shu-Lin Liu.

Writing – original draft: Fei-Feng Li, Qiong Zhang, Dong Zheng, Shu-Lin Liu.

Writing – review & editing: Qiong Zhang, Fei-Feng Li, Shu-Lin Liu.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CSVDs = cerebral small vessel diseases, LD = linkage-disequilibrium, RBPJ = recombination signal-binding protein Jκ, SNPs = single nucleotide polymorphism, VCI = cognitive impairment.

QZ, JZ, and HL contributed equally to this work.

Patient consent obtained.

Ethics approval was taken from the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by grants of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC30870098, 30970119, 81030029, 81271786, 81671980, 31671283), and grants from Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M601460), and Health and Family Planning Commission of Heilongjiang province Foundation (2016-189).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Teng Z, Dong Y, Zhang D, et al. Cerebral small vessel disease and post-stroke cognitive impairment. Int J Neurosci 2016;1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Tan R, Traylor M, Rutten-Jacobs L, et al. New insights into mechanisms of small vessel disease stroke from genetics. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017;131:515–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Charidimou A, Pantoni L, Love S. The concept of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: a road map on key definitions and current concepts. Int J Stroke 2016;11:6–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Norrving B. Evolving concept of small vessel disease through advanced brain imaging. J Stroke 2015;17:94–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:689–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Rutten-Jacobs LC, Traylor M, Adib-Samii P, et al. Common NOTCH3 variants and cerebral small-vessel disease. Stroke 2015;46:1482–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Thajeb P. Gait disorders of multi-infarct dementia. CT and clinical correlation. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;87:239–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Liu Y, Zhang Y, Lin L, et al. Effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on the axonal outgrowth through activation of PI3K/AKT signaling in primary cortical neurons followed oxygen-glucose deprivation injury. PLoS One 2013;8:e78514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Nowak DA. The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32:1439–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA. Absolute and relative contraindications to IV rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke. Neurohospitalist 2015;5:110–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Jeong HS, Song HJ, Kim SB, et al. A comparison of stent-assisted mechanical thrombectomy and conventional intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute cerebral infarction. J Clin Neurol 2013;9:91–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Liu N, Zhang Y, Fan L, et al. Effects of transplantation with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells modified by Survivin on experimental stroke in rats. J Transl Med 2011;9:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Han KT, Park EC, Kim SJ, et al. Effective strategy for improving health care outcomes: multidisciplinary care in cerebral infarction patients. Health Policy 2015;119:1039–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Gjerde G, Naess H. Risk factor burden predicts long-term mortality after cerebral infarction. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;129:173–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Zhu CY, Wang Y, Zeng QX, et al. Combined effects of age and polymorphisms in Notch3 in the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction disease. Metab Brain Dis 2016;31:1157–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Ling L, Zeng J, Pei Z, et al. Neurogenesis and angiogenesis within the ipsilateral thalamus with secondary damage after focal cortical infarction in hypertensive rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29:1538–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Liao SJ, Gong Q, Chen XR, et al. Netrin-1 rescues neuron loss by attenuating secondary apoptosis in ipsilateral thalamic nucleus following focal cerebral infarction in hypertensive rats. Neuroscience 2013;231:225–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Wang S, Zhou J, Kang W, et al. Tocilizumab inhibits neuronal cell apoptosis and activates STAT3 in cerebral infarction rat model. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2016;16:145–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • [19].Wang H, Guo W, Liu H, et al. Inhibition of inflammatory mediator release from microglia can treat ischemic/hypoxic brain injury. Neural Regen Res 2013;8:1157–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Tu Q, Cao H, Zhong W, et al. Atorvastatin protects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Neural Regen Res 2014;9:268–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Zhang HR, Peng JH, Zhu GY, et al. Neuroprotective effects of Bcl-2 overexpression on nerve cells of rats with acute cerebral infarction. Genet Mol Res 2015;14:7696–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Zhao JH, Xu YM, Xing HX, et al. Associations between matrix metalloproteinase gene polymorphisms and the development of cerebral infarction. Genet Mol Res 2016;14:19418–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1121–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Guan J, Wei X, Qu S, et al. Osthole prevents cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via Notch signaling pathway. Biochem Cell Biol 2017;95:459–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Yuan Y, Rangarajan P, Kan EM, et al. Scutellarin regulates the Notch pathway and affects the migration and morphological transformation of activated microglia in experimentally induced cerebral ischemia in rats and in activated BV-2 microglia. J Neuroinflammation 2015;12:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Maillard I, Fang T, Pear WS. Regulation of lymphoid development, differentiation, and function by the Notch pathway. Annu Rev Immunol 2005;23:945–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Li L, Xie T. Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005;21:605–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Penton AL, Leonard LD, Spinner NB. Notch signaling in human development and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012;23:450–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Shen Z, Hou X, Chen B, et al. NOTCH3 gene polymorphism is associated with the prognosis of gliomas in Chinese patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Castel D, Mourikis P, Bartels SJ, et al. Dynamic binding of RBPJ is determined by Notch signaling status. Genes Dev 2013;27:1059–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Hori K, Cholewa-Waclaw J, Nakada Y, et al. A nonclassical bHLH Rbpj transcription factor complex is required for specification of GABAergic neurons independent of Notch signaling. Genes Dev 2008;22:166–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Hsieh JJ, Hayward SD. Masking of the CBF1/RBPJ kappa transcriptional repression domain by Epstein–Barr virus EBNA2. Science 1995;268:560–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lv Q, Shen R, Wang J. RBPJ inhibition impairs the growth of lung cancer. Tumour Biol 2015;36:3751–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Orent W, McHenry AR, Rao DA, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated RBPJ polymorphism alters memory CD4+ T cells. Hum Mol Genet 2016;25:404–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Li FF, Liu Z, Yan P, et al. Identification of a novel mutation associated with familial adenomatous polyposis and colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Med 2015;36:1049–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Tan ZX, Li FF, Qu YY, et al. Identification of a known mutation in Notch 3 in familiar CADASIL in China. PLoS One 2012;7:e36590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Li FF, Han Y, Shi S, et al. Characterization of transcriptional repressor gene MSX1 variations for possible associations with congenital heart diseases. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Deng X, Zhou J, Li FF, et al. Characterization of nodal/TGF-lefty signaling pathway gene variants for possible roles in congenital heart diseases. PLoS One 2014;9:e104535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Li FF, Zhou J, Zhao DD, et al. Characterization of SMAD3 gene variants for possible roles in ventricular septal defects and other congenital heart diseases. PLoS One 2015;10:e0131542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Li X, Shi S, Li FF, et al. Characterization of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor gene STX18 variations for possible roles in congenital heart diseases. Gene 2017;598:79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Li FF, Zhu XD, Yan P, et al. Characterization of variations in IL23A and IL23R genes: possible roles in multiple sclerosis and other neuroinflammatory demyelinating diseases. Aging (Albany NY) 2016;8:2734–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Zhang C, Feng F, Zhu Y, et al. Cerebral infarction caused by pituitary apoplexy: case report and review of literature. Turk Neurosurg 2014;24:782–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Lawson ND, Scheer N, Pham VN, et al. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development 2001;128:3675–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Fischer A, Schumacher N, Maier M, et al. The Notch target genes Hey1 and Hey2 are required for embryonic vascular development. Genes Dev 2004;18:901–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. Arteries and veins: making a difference with zebrafish. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:674–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Shawber CJ, Kitajewski J. Notch function in the vasculature: insights from zebrafish, mouse and man. Bioessays 2004;26:225–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, et al. Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev 2000;14:1343–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Bray SJ. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7:678–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Gordon WR, Arnett KL, Blacklow SC. The molecular logic of Notch signaling—a structural and biochemical perspective. J Cell Sci 2008;121:3109–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Kopan R, Ilagan MX. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 2009;137:216–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Lai EC. Keeping a good pathway down: transcriptional repression of Notch pathway target genes by CSL proteins. EMBO Rep 2002;3:840–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Lu J, Verma SC, Cai Q, et al. The RBP-Jkappa binding sites within the RTA promoter regulate KSHV latent infection and cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog 2012;8:e1002479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Liang Y, Chang J, Lynch SJ, et al. The lytic switch protein of KSHV activates gene expression via functional interaction with RBP-Jkappa (CSL), the target of the Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev 2002;16:1977–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Lan K, Kuppers DA, Robertson ES. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus reactivation is regulated by interaction of latency-associated nuclear antigen with recombination signal sequence-binding protein Jkappa, the major downstream effector of the Notch signaling pathway. J Virol 2005;79:3468–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Hsieh JJ, Zhou S, Chen L, et al. CIR, a corepressor linking the DNA binding factor CBF1 to the histone deacetylase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:23–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Weinmaster G. Notch signal transduction: a real rip and more. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000;10:363–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Tani S, Kurooka H, Aoki T, et al. The N- and C-terminal regions of RBP-J interact with the ankyrin repeats of Notch1 RAMIC to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:1373–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES